26 views

Uploaded by annieeby

- n Theorem
- A Hierarchy of Importance Indices
- 26583558 Wittgenstein s Remarks on the Foundation of Mathematics
- Euler 1
- Humor
- Aczel, Using Computers to Learn Logic to Undergraduates
- wave.pdf
- Nucleation Parameters for Z Discrete Threshold Growth on Z 2
- On the hybrid mean value of the Smarandache kn-digital sequence and Smarandache function
- 416c4c02
- Invention of a Summation Formula Containing Bailey Theorem
- Discrete Math explained
- Fibonacci 1
- Number-The Language of Science
- grade 8 mathematics course of study overview v3 1
- Chapter 5 - INTRODUCTION TO EUCLID’S GEOMETRY
- Test 1 Review
- Mesh-Intro 14.0 L-07 Mesh Quality
- Ejercicios Resueltos - Introducción a la Geometría Analítica
- Partition Identities Arising From Theta Function Identities

You are on page 1of 3

Archimedes’ Method, Proposition 1 v.

Archimedes: Quadrature of the Parabola, Proposition 24

Archimedes demonstrates in two ways that the segment of a parabola is 4/3 the

demonstration. He says that the proposition first became clear to him by mechanical

methods; the geometrical method came second, to provide an actual proof of the

Parabola). In examining these two proofs we hope to find a) the different methods

supposition is made that the segment is equal to a certain area K, which fits the formula

we are trying to prove. For if the segment is not equal to area K, says Archimedes, it

must be greater or less than the area K. The proof then shows both of these options to be

geometric relations. Then Archimedes strays wildly from familiar geometry. The

Euclid defines a line as breadthless length. Archimedes, in order for his demonstration to

1

work, must contradict Euclid’s definition. Proposition 1 claims that lines can be situated

with their “centers of gravity” at a given point and that lines can be in equilibrium about a

certain point. But for a thing to have a center of gravity or to balance about a point, it

must have mass; in order for it to have mass, it must have breadth.

line with breadth. Once we secure a proportion between an arbitrary line within the

triangle and a line within the segment, Archimedes tells us the relationship is the same for

the whole triangle and the whole segment since the triangle “is made up of all the parallel

lines” like the one in our proportion, and the segment “is made up of all the straight lines”

like the corresponding line in the proportion. Again, in order for a segment to be “made

as it strays from Euclidean principles and depends on truths of the physical world. The

one’s ability to visualize a line being dragged across the segment and watch, as if in

motion, the lines grow and shrink while always remaining in proportion.

geometric proof and is perhaps more intuitively understood, Archimedes ends his

proposition with a claim that the theorem has not been demonstrated; he only suspects it

to be true. In his assertion that he needs a purely geometric proof in order to show the

truth of the theorem, he seems to assume that truth can only be found in the realm of pure

geometry. Somehow, his use of physical phenomena (centers of gravity and points of

2

If mechanical demonstrations are corrupted by the use of physical phenomena and

are not trustworthy as proofs, why is it the mechanical proposition which occurs to

Archimedes first? Why is the mechanical proposition easier to visualize than the purely

because it relates more closely with our experience. Any line we can imagine does have

breadth. It is therefore feasible to imagine one dragging a line to complete the area of a

segment. Any “line” we can create does have mass and a center of gravity. So it is

possible to imagine that lines could balance against one another. The geometric proof, in

contrast, depends on other propositions (Prop 23, in particular) which, though graspable

because he hopes it will help him get a start on his own investigations. Though

mechanical demonstrations might not be accepted as proof of a theorem, they allow one

to see through the use of the physical world if the theorem is likely true. The fact that

mechanical proofs use our experience of the physical world makes them more accessible

and easier to visualize, even as they stray from the Euclidean world of pure logic.

- n TheoremUploaded byALBERTO314
- A Hierarchy of Importance IndicesUploaded byraja
- 26583558 Wittgenstein s Remarks on the Foundation of MathematicsUploaded byKarl Andersson
- Euler 1Uploaded byShane Fernandes
- HumorUploaded byNimit Chaudhry
- Aczel, Using Computers to Learn Logic to UndergraduatesUploaded bysotirisdelis
- wave.pdfUploaded byaityahiamassylia
- Nucleation Parameters for Z Discrete Threshold Growth on Z 2Uploaded byTavares Gutierrez
- On the hybrid mean value of the Smarandache kn-digital sequence and Smarandache functionUploaded byDon Hass
- 416c4c02Uploaded byLouis Guy
- Invention of a Summation Formula Containing Bailey TheoremUploaded byTI Journals Publishing
- Discrete Math explainedUploaded bydjpsychoscientz
- Fibonacci 1Uploaded byBiswarup Burman
- Number-The Language of ScienceUploaded bybbscribed
- grade 8 mathematics course of study overview v3 1Uploaded byapi-328481994
- Chapter 5 - INTRODUCTION TO EUCLID’S GEOMETRYUploaded byshaunakalele
- Test 1 ReviewUploaded bymplukie
- Mesh-Intro 14.0 L-07 Mesh QualityUploaded byPercy Romero Murillo
- Ejercicios Resueltos - Introducción a la Geometría AnalíticaUploaded byJesús Moreno Plasencia
- Partition Identities Arising From Theta Function IdentitiesUploaded byapi-26401608
- 30 2 MathematicsUploaded byRaghuSrinivasan
- 6.Drawing ShapeUploaded byAziz Mamat
- supvolUploaded byegal480306
- Lecture Note 05 - Vector Differential CalculusUploaded bymahapatih_51
- sfUploaded byhat
- Ex_2_10_FSC_part2Uploaded byFakhar Abbas
- Lorand LakatosUploaded bydusan.pavlovic
- Final Review Answer SheetUploaded bybwlomas
- 3DGEN=ProposalUploaded byUddhab Kr Saral
- 1Uploaded byManpreet Singh

- between Sadra’s Philosophy and Husserl's PhenomenologyUploaded byruilov
- Mackie the Miracle of Theism Arguments for and Against the Existence of God BM.11--199-216Uploaded byjorrit w
- Inference EquationUploaded byMiles
- Theories of KnowledgeUploaded byNovYad
- Dot1988e Concept Image IcmeUploaded byChong Chin Yen
- EDU 300Uploaded byBenson Hanson
- Inquiry & 5E Instructional ModelUploaded byAliaa Iryani
- Kant's Account of FreedomUploaded byadmin0123
- Where Do Research Problem Come FromUploaded byLeonardo Garzon
- Fundamentals of ResearchUploaded byPaul Dayang
- Moral Psychology at the CrossroadsUploaded byclou321d
- Cronbach 1955Uploaded bypatty_maldonado_4
- Advaita Vedanta and Quantum Physics - How Human Consciousness Creates Reality.Uploaded byBryan Graczyk
- (Linguistic Approaches to Literature) Chloe Harrison, Louise Nuttall, Peter Stockwell, Wenjuan Yuan-Cognitive Grammar in Literature-John Benjamins Publishing Company (2014)Uploaded bylucicruz
- The Role of Philosophy in Curriculum DevelopmentUploaded byZonaeidZaman
- Phenomenology _ Internet Encyclopedia of PhilosophyUploaded byfred65
- Socratic Moral PsychologyUploaded bygkiran_ch
- LINDBERG, S., Heidegger´s animal. 2004.Uploaded byAgustina Sforza
- More Than 2000 Solved MCQs on Research MethodsUploaded byRama Nathan
- rp138_article1_vocabularyofeuropeanphilosophiespart1Uploaded byPeter Müller
- Principles of Language Learning and Teaching (Longman) – Chapter 1: Language learning and teachingUploaded byLuis Rodriguez Zalazar
- Action Research WadsworthUploaded byAshenafi Tesfaye
- Assignment 1Uploaded byomkarenator
- Tasawwar-e-KhudaUploaded byAbubakar Bullo
- NewmanUploaded byJjonia Palvoni
- SAT solver for Multi-agent Sokoban PuzzleUploaded byRavi Kuril
- Essay on Transcendental RealismUploaded byAhmed Rizk
- Filosofia SamkhyaUploaded byAlfonso Bp
- Research Designs and Its ImportanceUploaded bysiddhartha venkata t
- Bloom's of TaxonomyUploaded byMelinda Cariño Chavez