c
 





c  




c
 
 
 c c 
c
Any critique or exposeǯ of Islam is usually met with name-calling (e.g.,
DzIslamophobiadz) from Islamists and their enablers, rather than rational or
factual responses and rebuttals.

There are at least two reasons for this.

First, sharia law does not provide for nor protect free speech. Criticism of
Islam, Allah or Mohammed is a criminal offense. When Muslims attempt to
suppress free speech critiques of Islam they are abiding by sharia law, and
insisting that we non-Muslims bow before sharia law as well. They
frequently get furious when we refuse to do so.

Second, as two examples below will attest, public discourse and debates
about radical Islam reveal the truth that Islamists donǯt want Americans to
see. Hence, they rant, rave, and name call in the hopes of demonizing those
who dare to expose the truth so as to keep the truth from the American
people.

Two recent events reveal why Islamists and their enablers avoid genuine
debate.

y A recent event held in Des Moines, Iowa, entitled DzA Forum on Being An

American Muslim,dz produced a very illuminating exchange, where ACT! for
America chapter leader Steve Kirbyǯs question about sharia law and free
speech was completely ignored by the Muslim moderator. x




 


 










 

  To read Steveǯs short summary of
this incident, please click here. (You will need Adobe Acrobat to open the PDF).
y A recent debate was held in New York, debating the motion DzIs Islam a religion
of peace?dz To view this fascinating debate, please click here.

Prior to the debate, the audience members were polled as to their position on
the motion.
 r
were for the motion
25
were against the motion
3r
were undecided

After the debate, the audience was polled again. Check out these eye-popping
results!

36
were for the motion (a decrease of 5 percentage points)

55
were against the motion (an increase of 30 percentage points)
9
were undecided

In other words, after seeing only one debate, most of the undecideds and some
of those who initially agreed that DzIslam is a religion of peacedz changed their
positions to opposing the motion.

Small wonder we see so few Muslims willing to step forward and defend
sharia law and the ideology of radical Islam!! Truth and the facts are
stacked so heavily against them they can only hope to Dzwindz by suppressing
speech that exposes the truth.
