You are on page 1of 9

bauhaus

arth 2100 ¥ KR rudynski


spring 01

I. LRI CONTRIBUTIONS:

1. Discuss and analyze Laszlo Moholy-Nagy philosophy about the integration of type
and photo- which he called ÔtypophotoÕ. Utilize Bauhaus publications Fourteen
Bauhaus Books, Bauhaus Book 12, and Bauhaus Book 14 as sources for discussion &
analysis.
2. Highlight Herbert BayerÕs role & contributions at the Bauhaus, and discuss his design
First Bauhaus Seal, 1919-22
philosophy for the Universal Alphabet of 1925.
Designed Karl-Peter Ršhl
3. Brief background on Jan Tschichold and discuss the turnabout in his life from typo-
graphic revolutionary to guardian of traditional typography.
4. Compare/contrast Anderson UniversityÕs department of Art & Design foundation
curriculum to that of the Bauhaus.

¥Lyonel Feininger (1871-1956)


1. Bauhaus Manifesto Cover- woodcut ÒCathedralÓ;1919
2. Europaische Graphic, woodcut title page; 1921
3. First Bauhaus Seal, student design; Johannnes Auerbach; 1919
¥ Joost Schmidt (1893-1948)
4. Bauhaus Poster; 1923
"Only an idea 5. Offset 7, book jacket; 1926
has the power ¥Laszlo Moholy-Nagy (1895-1946)
6. Bauhaus Book 12,;1925
to spread so far" 7. Bauhaus Book 14,;1929
8. Bauhaus Book, cover, 1925
Ludwig Mies van der Rohe
9. Maleri, Photographie, Film; 1925
¥Herbert Bayer (1900-1985)
10. Mural designs for Weimar Bauhaus stairwell;1923
11. Universal type; 1925
12. Universal type, display version; 1925
13. Kandinsky Exhibition Poster; 1926
14. Exhibition of Arts,;1927
15. Bauhaus Magazine, cover; 1928
16. Bauhaus Magazine, cover, 1928
17. Section Allemande exhibition of the Deutscher Werkbund Poster, Paris; 1930
Bauhaus Seal, 1922
18. die neue linie, Outdoor billboard; 1932
Oskar Schlemmer
19. Adrainol nose drops, product poster; 1935
¥ Jan Tschichold (1902-1974)
20. Buster Keaton in: ÒDer GeneralÓ, movie poster; 1927
21. The Woman without Name, movie poster; 1927
22. The Professional Photographer, exhibition poster; 1938
23. Die Neue Typographie; double spread from book, 1928
24. Konstruktivisten; poster, 1937
25. The Pelican History of Art; book cover, 1947
26. The Pelican Shakespeare; book cover, 1947
27. Die Flucht aus Derzeit; book-jacket design, 1944
28. Schatzkammer der Schriebkunst; Prospectus, 1945
29. Schatzkammer der Schriebkunst, Title page, 1945
page 2 ¥ rudynski ¥ spring 01 ¥ bauhaus

II. Introduction:
After W.W. I, unemployment, inflation, political chaos, and war debt took its toll on Germany. However it was
at this time that graphic design began to play a larger and more important role in the modern industrialized cities of
Northern Europe. Not just in posters, but in advertising leaflets, corporate brochures, logo and letterhead design, cata-
logues for industrial products and trade show displays.
Richard Hollis in his book Graphic Design: A Concise History states that Futurism and Italy, Constructivism from
the Soviet Union, deStijl from the Netherlands and the Bauhaus from Germany represent the origins of modernism in
20 century the graphic design. Germany found itself between two powerful and influential avant-garde: Communism
and Constructivism in the U.S.S.R. from the East, and the Dutch and the deStijl from the West. Germany had its own
proud history of excellent design in Ludwig Hohlwein and Lucian Bernhard, but what was now to emerge from
Germany was to become the most influential school of design education in the 20th century. Today, students studying
in an art and design program with a Òfoundation programÓ, a ÒreviewÓ period, 3-dimensional design, color theory course-
work, and professional internship experiences can find a link to the Bauhaus school some seven decades ago. Industrial
and graphic designers share an indebtedness to the Bauhaus for its thinking on materials use, typography, page struc-
ture, and the rational form follows function dictum. Although the Bauhaus was to only last in Germany for some 14
years, and undergo many changes during that time, its influence was continued and experienced through the immigra-
tion of many of its teachers and students throughout the world-especially in the United States. This assured the influ-
ence of European modernism on American art and design then, and a ripple effect that is still experienced today.

III. Bauhaus: The Manifesto


appointed the director of the
in 1919, at age 31(36 in some accounts) by Henry van de Velde.
Born into a family strong in architecture and educational connections. Studied architecture in Berlin and
Munich. Joined the Berlin firm AEG headed by Peter Behrens, and became head designer in1907. Left
shortly after and started his own firm. Was associated with the Werkbund, a group formed to promote
good design standards among German industrialists. Its ultimate goal to the improvement in the quality
of German products. He served in W. W. I and was seriously wounded in the leg on the Western Front
and awarded the Iron Cross twice (Whitford, 35).
¥a. Names the school Bauhaus a year later. The noun literally means ÔbuildingÕ. In the Middle Ages
the were guilds of masons, builders and decorators, out of which freemasons sprang.
also means Ôto grow a cropÕ, and this is no doubt an association that Gropius intended the
name of the school to carry (Whitford, 29).
¥b. He strove to reorganize the relationship of fine arts and applied arts. Gropius sought a new unity of
art and machine-artistically trained designers could Ôbreathe a soul into the dead product of the
machineÕ. Only the most brilliant ideas were good enough to justify multiplication by industry.
¥c. Authored the Bauhaus manifesto which was published in German newspapers, along with a
Cathedral woodcut.
ÒThe complete building is the ultimate aim of all the visual arts. Once the noblest function of the
fine arts was to embellish buildings; there were indispensable components of great architecture.
Today the arts exist in isolation...Architects, painters, and sculptors must learn anew the composite
character of the building as an entity...The artist is an exalted craftsman. In rare moments of
inspiration, transcending his conscious will, the grace of heaven may cause his work to blossom into
art. But proficiency in his craft is essential to every artist. Therein lies the prime source of creative
imagination.Ó (Meggs, 288)
¥d. For Gropius, the building was a social, intellectual, and symbolic activity. The Gothic Cathedral
represents the unity of the three forms (Painting, sculpture, architecture). An allegory of the total work
of art and symbol of social unity. A representation of peopleÕs longing for a spiritual beauty that went
beyond utility and need (Meggs, 289)
¥e. The three major aims of the manifesto: 1. ...to rescue all the arts from the isolation in which each
found themselves in...and to train artists to collaborate in future projects where all their skills would be
combined, 2. ...to elevate the status of the crafts to which the Ôfine artsÕ enjoyed, and 3. to establish
Ôconstant contact with the leaders of the crafts and industries of the countryÕ.
¥f. Gropius brought an intensely visionary point of view and drew inspiration from Expressionism.
Expressionism urged social change and even revolution: these were to flow naturally out of a profound
change in human consciousness. Art, the Expressionist believed, could change the world (Whitford, 26).
page 3 ¥ rudynski ¥ spring 01 ¥ bauhaus

IV. The Bauhaus at Weimar (1 919-1924)


¥a. Gropius was strongly anti-academic. He organized his school into workshops, not studios. The aim
of the workshops was to overlap and integrate theoretical form teaching with practical workshop
training, and also eliminate Ôstatus warsÕ. Workshops included pottery, textile, metal, furniture,
stained glass, wood-carving, bookbinding, graphic printing, and theater. Signifying that the
school was craft based, and operating in the Ôreal worldÕ. He disliked the language ÒprofessorsÓ
and organized the workshop leadership into two equal groups: ÔMasters of FormÕ, to help student
explore their own creativity and ÔWorkshop MastersÕ, to help students in methods and technique.
These two groups were to work in close cooperation to provide students a more comprehensive and
unified educationÐwhich was limited to a maximum of 4 years. The model Gropius used was based
upon the medieval lines-master (Workshop Masters & Masters of Form), journeymen, and
apprentice (Students).
¥d. Approximately 75 women were enrolled when the Bauhaus opened. The Weimar constitution
guaranteed women unrestricted freedom of study. Academies could no longer discriminate. Women
were usually directed to weaving workshops, with pottery and bookbinding as possible alternatives.
Many men dismissed their art as ÔfeminineÕ or ÔhandicraftÕ. Men were afraid to have the Bauhaus
appear to arty-craftyÐwhich could threaten the goal of the BauhausÐbuilding or architecture.
¥c. Gropius brought together an astonishingly diverse range of artists to the Weimar school:
1. First appointments included painters Johannes Itten, Lyonel Feininger, and sculptor
Gerhard Marcks.
2. Painters Paul Klee (1879-1940) and Oskar Schlemmer, and Wassily Kandinsky (1866-
1944) in 1920 and 1922 respectively.
¥d. Johannes Itten (Swiss; 1888-1967) who was responsible for the introduction of a preliminary
course called This become a central feature of the Bauhaus-if a student didnÕt
successfully complete this coursework, they couldnÕt move onto the next workshop.
¥ IttenÕs pedagogical principles were based upon intuition and method, or subjective experience
and objective recognition. In two of his exercises he required students to work with various
textures forms, colors and tones in both 2- and 3-dimensions. The second demanded an
analysis of art in terms of rhythmic lines which were meant to capture the spirit, the expressive
content of the original. He would frequently start classes with breathing exercises, meditation,
and physical bending & stretching.
¥ IttenÕs curious religious practices, teaching methods, and influence upon the students made
Gropius uncomfortable. Itten didnÕt appreciate GropiusÕs interest in business/school
collaborations. These differences eventually led to IttenÕs resignation.
¥e. A tremendous group of students emerge from the early courses at the Bauhaus:
It wasnÕt easy to get into the Bauhaus, enrollment was never more than 100 at a time, and
rejection after the first course was high. The total student enlistment was1,250 (Whitford, 69
Herbert Bayer, Joost Schmidt, Marcel Breuer, and Josef Albers. They had a hand in all media
while in school, and continued their mastery in a wide range of media thereafter. Each returned to
teach at the Bauhaus later.
¥f. The beginning of change: New Unity of Art & Technology:
¥The Bauhaus enjoyed a exchange of ideas with many other avant garde designers/artists:
Theo van Doesburg-Dutch deStijl; El Lissitzky-Constructivist
¥Laszlo-Moholy-Nagy was appointed as IttenÕs replacement in 1923. A Hungarian
Contructivist. Follower of Vladmir Tatlin and Lissitzky. He explored photography, painting, film,
sculpture, and graphic design. He introduced new materials like plexiglas, new techniques like
photomontage, and photograms, visual means including kinetic motion, light, and
transparency. Moholy-Nagy was passionate about typography. He saw graphic design,
particularly the poster, as evolving toward the typophoto. He called this objective integration
of word and image to communicate a message with immediacy Òthe new visual
literature.ÓMoholy was ahalf-way house between the rigor of the de Stijl and Constructivism.
The appointment of Mohly-Nagy was uncomfortably received by other colleagues and
studentsÐit signaled a clear shift in GropiusÕs vision. A move away from the revival of
craftsmanship to a new breed of designer capable of conceiving products made for the machine.
¥g. Conflicts with the Thuringian government prompted Gropius to search for a new site for the school.
page 4 ¥ rudynski ¥ spring 01 ¥ bauhaus

V. The Bauhaus at Dessau: 1 925-1932


The Bauhaus moved to Dessau in 1925. Progressively, new buildings were designed by Gropius, and a new curriculum
put into place. Gropius continued to change the orientation of the curriculum away from the medieval structureÐto one
based upon a ÔbusinessÕ structure. Masters were now professors, and trained craftsman were employed but they were
no longer treated as equals. Gropius had in part, created the structure in Weimar out of necessityÐthere were few indi-
viduals equally gifted and trained in artistic theory and craft practice. Enough students had now graduated, and were
qualified to undertake the dual roles of Master of Form and Workshop Masters. The new charge now was to train Ô a
new breed of collaborator for industry, craft, and building who is a master equally of technique and formÕ (Whitford,
157). A ÔBauhaus CorporationÕ was formed to engage in business enterprise. Goals were to handle sale of workshop pro-
totypes to industry. Abundant ideas flowed from the Bauhaus at this time to influence 20th century designÐproduct,
architecture, furniture, and graphic design.
¥a. Some workshops were closed, others were absorbed into new ones. 6 of the 12 professors were
former students including Albers, Bayer, Breuer, and Schmidt.
¥b. Gropius gave up working in the cabinet-making workshop to focus on architectural commissions,
and to introduce a department of architecture focus to the Bauhaus. (1927) Hannes Meyer (1889-
1954), a Swiss architect, was hired to head it.
¥c. The printmaking workshop, which primarily was devoted to the production of graphic art, now was
dedicated to layout, typography, and advertising. Former student Herbert Bayer lead the new work
shop.
1. Herbert Bayer (Austrian, 1900-1984) :
¥a. Student at the Bauhaus in 1921, carried out typographic commissions while a student. Studied
under Moholy-Nagy ,the de Stijl, and LissitzkyÕs also studied with Kandinsky in his
wall-painting workshop (mural) providing him with disciplined organization of form and color that
shows up in his painting, and would also be made explicit in his functional typography-clarity and
uncluttered.
¥b. Worked with an architect in Darmstadt until 1925; at this time he was introduced to packaging
design
¥c. He put in charge of the schoolÕs printing department in 1925
¥d. His typographic approach included heavy rules, asymmetrical page layout. He considered capital
letters and serifs redundant.
¥e. His campaign against serifs and capital letters was at a time when German design was using
"Gothic" style lettering and required the use of capitals on every noun. He proposed to Gropius that
the Bauhaus should follow his plan to eliminate their use. Bayer felt that lowercase alone was more
economical because it required just one alphabet instead of two. Bayer, along with Moholy
championed the use of the sans-serif type at the Bauhaus.
¥f. Undertook the design of a new type style ÔUniversalÕ (1926) to implement his theories.
¥g. Bayer resigned in 1928, and was replaced by Joost Schmidt. Bayer moved on to run his own
advertising agency in Berlin, and then moved to America to work in advertising and corporate
identity.
2. Walter Gropius resigns in 1928, and Haanes Meyer takes over and remains until 1930 when he resigns
do to ongoing difficulties with the Dessau municipal authorities. Ludwig Mies Van der Rohe, created a
short-lived stability, before a Nazi-dominated Dessau city council withdrew all staff contracts in 1932.
He attempted to keep the Bauhaus open in Berlin in an abandoned telephone factory, but continued Nazi
harassment caused them to dissolve the Bauhaus in July 1933.
3. Attempts to revive the Bauhaus ideas and methods emerged in America. The ÔNew BauhausÕ
was founded by Moholy-Nagy in Chicago in 1937. Gropius went to work at Harvard, Albers worked at
both Black Mountain College, and Yale.
¥ That there was ever a Bauhaus style was always denied by Walter GropiusÐ he insisted that what the
school had sought to develop was not a uniform visual identity but an attitude towards creativity
intended to result in variety (Whitford, 198). However a distinctive Bauhaus style did become
associated with the school and it is a testament, albeit maybe an undesired one, of the significant
influence the people, program, ideas, and the work produced had on the world.
page 5 ¥ rudynski ¥ spring 01 ¥ bauhaus

VI. BIBLIOGRAPHY :

Chwast, Seymour & Heller, Steven.


(New York: Harry N. Abrams, Inc. 1988) pgs. 112-119

Cohen, Arthur A.
(Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press, 1984)

Droste, Magdalena.
(Germany: Bauhaus-Archive Museum, 1990)

Hollis, Richard.
(New York: Thames & Hudson. 1994) Chapter 6,

Humphries, Lund.
(London: Lund Humphries Publishers Limited, 1975)

Lupton, Ellen and Miller, J. Abbott, Editors.


New York: Princeton Architectural Press. 1991)

Meggs, Philip. 2nd ed.


(New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold, 1992) Chapter 19,

Whitford, Frank.
(New York: Thames & Hudson. 1984)

Chess Table, 1924


Heinz Nšsselt

Bauhaus Chess Set, 1924


Designed by Josef Hartwig
plate page 4 ¥ rudynski ¥ spring 01 ¥ bauhaus

Jan Tschichold

1. Cover of Fototek, 1930


2. Film Poster for DieHose, 1927
1 2

3
Jan Tschichold

3. Title page for Book, 1945


4. Cover for Penguin Books,
Shakespeare, 1947

4
plate page 3 ¥ rudynski ¥ spring 01 ¥ bauhaus
1 2

Laszlo Moholy-Nagy 6
1. Bauhaus Book 14

2. Bauhaus Book 12

3. International Architecture Cover, left


Dust Jacket for Bauhaus Book 14, right

4. Light Modulator

5. Light Modulator Sequence

6. From Radio Tower, Berlin,


1928.Photograph

5
page 6 ¥ rudynski ¥ spring 01 ¥ bauhaus

Bauhaus Manifesto, Walter Gropius Bauhaus Program Diagram, Gropius. 1922


Woodcut by Lyonel Feininger, 1919

Bauhaus Magazine, 1928 Bauhaus Exhibition, Poster, 1923


Herbert Bayer Joost Schmidt

Type Design for Universal, 1925 Study for Bauhaus Exhibition


Herbert Bayer Poster, 1968

You might also like