You are on page 1of 61

HYDRAULIC RESISTANCE

Local (Minor!) Pressure Losses

TFD-FD06 – Hydraulic Resistance Local (Minor!) Losses 1


Local Pressure Losses
(Minor Losses!)

q Although they often account for a major portion of the


total pressure loss, the additional losses due to entries
and exits, fittings and valves are traditionally
referred to as minor losses!
q These losses represent additional energy dissipation in
the flow, usually caused by secondary flows induced
by curvature or recirculation.
q The minor losses are any total pressure loss present in
addition to the total pressure loss for the same length of
straight pipe.

TFD-FD06 – Hydraulic Resistance Local (Minor!) Losses 2


Modified Bernoulli Equation
q Bernoulli equation is valid along any streamline in any
frictionless flow
§ However, this is very restrictive.
§ Solid walls introduce friction effects.
§ Fittings in a piping system as well as cross sectional area
changes introduce frictional pressure losses.
q Bernoulli’s equation can be modified to include these
frictional losses present in any fluid system network
fL 1 2
p1 + ρv1 + ρgh1 = p 2 + ρv 2 + ρgh2 + ρ + ∑ ρ
1 2 1 2
1 2
2 2 v 2 2 K 2 v 2
Dh
Wall Local
Friction Losses

K is the coefficient of flow


(hydraulic) resistance
TFD-FD06 – Hydraulic Resistance Local (Minor!) Losses 3
Coefficient of Flow Resistance - K
A Dimensionless Parameter

q Coefficient of flow resistance is defined as the ratio of the total


energy lost over the given segment to the kinetic energy in the
section
§ Ratio of the total pressure lost over the segment to the dynamic
pressure in the segment

Total Pressure Loss


Flow Resistance =
Dynamic Pressure (Kinetic Energy)

q Flow resistance coefficient K, for the case of uniform distribution


of static pressure and density over the segment but which are
variable along the flow
∆ptotal
K=
1 ρv 2
2 o
TFD-FD06 – Hydraulic Resistance Local (Minor!) Losses 4
Base Area for Flow Resistance
q Flow resistance coefficients can be expressed in terms of the
upstream or downstream velocity of the component
§ Loss term can be added to upstream or downstream velocity with the
same net effect
K up × 12 ρvup
2
= K down × 12 ρvdown
2

fL
+ ( + ∑ K down ) 12 ρvdown
1 2 1 2 2
pup + 2 ρvup = p down + 2 ρv down K up 2
vdown 2
Adown
Dh = 2 = 2
K down vup Aup
fL
+ ∑ K up ) 12 ρvup
1 2 2 1 2
pup + 2 ρvup + ( = p down + 2 ρv down 2
Dh  Adown 
K up = K down ×  
 A 
 up 
q Base area for all flow resistances (K) shown in
this section are given based on the smallest ∆p
cross sectional area of the component K=
1 ρv 2
hence the largest velocity. 2 base

TFD-FD06 – Hydraulic Resistance Local (Minor!) Losses 5


Equivalent Length of Fittings
q Local (minor) losses can be represented in a different way using the
the concept of equivalent length
§ Inclusion of local losses in Bernoulli equation can make the iterative
type problems labor intensive
§ Local losses can be significantly higher for relatively short piping
systems and may not be ignored

fL 1
+( ρ + ∑ ρ
1 2 1 2 2 1 2
p1 + 2 ρV1 + ρgh1 = p3 + 2 ρV3 + ρgh3 2 V3 K 2 V3 )
Dh
fL
+( + ∑ K ) 12 ρV32
1 2 1 2
p1 + 2 ρV1 + ρgh1 = p3 + 2 ρV3 + ρgh3
Dh

fLeq
∑K = Dh
TFD-FD06 – Hydraulic Resistance Local (Minor!) Losses 6
Equivalent Length of Fittings

q Concept of equivalent length allows us to replace the local


(minor) loss term with equivalent pipe length

fLeq
Dh (ΣK )
ΣK = ⇒ Leq =
Dh f
§ f is the friction factor that applies to the entire pipe
§ D is the pipe hydraulic diameter
(characteristic length)
§ Leq is the equivalent length: Length of pipe which can replace
the fitting (local loss) to obtain the same pressure loss

TFD-FD06 – Hydraulic Resistance Local (Minor!) Losses 7


List of Configurations
q Sudden Expansion q Orifice In a Straight Tube
q Sudden Expansion in One § Sharp Edge
Plane § Rounded
q Sudden Contraction § Beveled
§ Vena Contracta Effect § Thick Edge
q Bend q Orifice In a Tube Transition
q Conical Expansion § Sharp Edge
q Conical Contraction § Rounded
q Uniformly Distributed Barriers § Beveled
§ Wire Screen § Thick Edge
§ Threaded Screen
§ Two Plane Screen
q Gratings in Line With Flow
TFD-FD06 – Hydraulic Resistance Local (Minor!) Losses 8
Resistance to Flow
Sudden Changes in
Flow Area

Sudden Expansion
Sudden Contraction
Vena Contracta Effect

TFD-FD06 – Hydraulic Resistance Local (Minor!) Losses 9


Sudden Expansion Pressure Losses
q An abrupt expansion of a tube A1
Vortices
A2

cross-sectional area gives rise to


so-called shock losses.
q The local pressure loss due to this P1
Jet
P2

“shock” depends only on the cross


sectional area ratio A1/A2.
A1 2
K exp = (1 − )
A2 L2

§ The area ratio of A1/A2


is less than 1.0 P1 Jet
P2

q Assumptions:
§ Uniform velocity distribution at 8-12 Dh

A2
cross section A1 A1

§ Reynolds number > 104 Base area is A1


TFD-FD06 – Hydraulic Resistance Local (Minor!) Losses 10
Sudden Expansion Pressure Losses
q The jet formed due to sudden expansion,
§ is separated from the remaining medium
§ Forms a significant turbulence as shown by the vortices near the
wall surfaces.
q It requires a pipe length (L2) of 8-12 hydraulic diameters
(Dh) before relatively uniform flow of velocity v2 is
established.

TFD-FD06 – Hydraulic Resistance Local (Minor!) Losses 11


Sudden Expansion in One Plane
q When an abrupt expansion of the tube
cross section occurs only in one plane
(as shown in the Figure) the shock
losses decrease with an increase in
the aspect ratio B/H.
§ B is the width of larger cross section
§ H is the constant height of the channel
q Loss coefficient is:
Dependence of k1 on B/H

A1 2
K exp = k1 (1 − )
A2

q Where k1 =< 1 is correction factor which depends on the aspect


ratio B/H.
TFD-FD06 – Hydraulic Resistance Local (Minor!) Losses 12
Sudden Contraction
q When the cross section abruptly Ac A3
contracts the phenomenon is
basically a similar to that observed
when shock losses occur during
abrupt expansion
q Contraction losses occur when the
jet A1
Vena
Contracta
§ Is further compressed after entering
the section A3 - vena contracta effect
§ Effective flow diameter reduces to Ac
§ Expands until it fills the entire section
of the narrow channel A3
0.75 Ac
 A3 
K Cont = 0.51 −  A1 A3

 A1 
TFD-FD06 – Hydraulic Resistance Local (Minor!) Losses
Base area is A3
13
Vena Contracta Effect
q Flow passage through the
contraction is accompanied by
distortion of the trajectories of
particles with the result that
they continue their motion
by inertia toward the axis of
the opening.
q This reduces the initial area of C-C’
Plane of
the jet cross section at C-C Vena Contracta
until the area is smaller than the
area of the cross section of the
opening. Plane of vena
contracta.
q Starting mid-section CC, the trajectory of moving particles are
straightened.
q Thereafter an abrupt jet expansion takes place.
TFD-FD06 – Hydraulic Resistance Local (Minor!) Losses 14
Tube Walls Following Flow Streamlines

q The pressure loss of a


contracting cross section can be
significantly reduced with a Pipe Wall

tube boundary following the flow


streamlines.
§ Allowing a smooth transition
from a wide section to the
narrow one
§ With the curvilinear boundaries Converging
Nozzle
Diverging
Nozzle
§ Converging and diverging
(expanding) nozzle

TFD-FD06 – Hydraulic Resistance Local (Minor!) Losses 15


Resistance to Flow
Changes of the Stream Direction

Flow Losses in an Elbow


Flanged Elbow
Standard Threaded Elbow
Miter Bend

TFD-FD06 – Hydraulic Resistance Local (Minor!) Losses 16


Change of Flow Direction
q In elbows the streamlines are curved and centrifugal force causes a
pressure increase near the outer wall of the elbow.
q Starting at point A pressure increases and rising to a maximum value at B.
q In region AB the fluid flow is opposed by an adverse pressure gradient.
q At the inside of the elbow, the pressure decreases to point C and then rises
again in the exit section D.
q For this reason an adverse pressure B
Higher
gradient also exists from C to D at pressure
region
the inside wall. D
Lower
q These conditions may lead to a pressure
region
separation and turbulence and
A C
corresponding losses in flow energy.
q The magnitude of these losses to a
large extend depend on the
sharpness of the curvature.

TFD-FD06 – Hydraulic Resistance Local (Minor!) Losses 17


Flow Losses In an Elbow
q The main portion of flow pressure losses in curved tubes is due to
formation of eddies at the inner wall.
q Other conditions being equal, the curved tube offers the largest
resistance in the case when the curvature at the inner wall is a
sharp corner.
q Rounding of the elbow corners makes the flow separation much
smoother and consequently lowers the resistance.
§ A big majority of flow the flow losses can be
recovered by rounding the inner corner and
leaving the outer elbow sharp.
• Cross sectional area at the place of bending
increases sharply (As shown in red x-section)
• Rounding the outer elbow corner and keeping the inner corner sharp does
not reduce the elbow resistance.
• Large radius on the outer elbow will even increase flow losses since it would
reduce the cross sectional area significantly (As shown in green x-sec)
TFD-FD06 – Hydraulic Resistance Local (Minor!) Losses 18
Minimizing Elbow Resistance
q The minimum resistance is achieved by an r1
elbow when outer & inner radii is related as
Ro
r1 ro
= + 0 .6
do do ro

q The resistance of right angle elbows can


do
greatly be reduced by installing a fairing on
the inner corner
§ An optimum fairing with a ratio of ro/do = 0.45
reduces the pressure losses by approx 50% r1
§ An additional fairing on the outer corner with a
ratio of r1/do = 0.45 reduces the losses by an ro
additional 5%.
q Reduction in the elbow resistance can also be
attained by beveling sharp corners of the bend do
especially the inner corner
TFD-FD06 – Hydraulic Resistance Local (Minor!) Losses 19
Minimizing Elbow Resistance
Example of a Coolant Return Elbow

Base Case

Design A

Design B

q Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) was used to


minimize the flow losses in a coolant return elbow.
q Fairing on the inner corner together with a smooth
outer radius reduced the flow losses significantly.
TFD-FD06 – Hydraulic Resistance Local (Minor!) Losses 20
Minimizing Elbow Resistance
Example of a Coolant Return Elbow

∆p = 16.5kPa (100%)
Base Case

Flow Separation Fairly small


effective
∆p = 4.6kPa ( 27%)
flow area
Design A
Streamlines outside Higher velocity on outside corner
after 90 degree flow turn
corner radius

Fairing
CFD results shown in
terms of velocity Larger Inlet cross
Design B
vectors and velocity sectional area

color contours ∆p = 3.9kPa (23%)


Higher velocity on inside corner
before 90 degree flow turn

77% reduction in pressure losses is significant!


TFD-FD06 – Hydraulic Resistance Local (Minor!) Losses 21
Flow Resistance of Elbows
Crane 1988, A-29

q Resistance (K) of 90 degree Ro/do K/Ft do (mm) Ft


smooth, flanged elbow 1 20 12.5 0.027
1.5 14 19 0.025
2 12 25 0.23
r1 3 12 32 0.22
4 14 38 0.021
Ro 6 17 50 0.019
8 24 75 0.018
10 30 100 0.017
ro 12
14
34
38
125
150
0.016
0.015
16 42 250 0.014
20 50 400 0.013
do 600 0.012
Flanged Elbow

q ft is the turbulent friction factor


given in the Table above
q Resistance (K) of standard
Standard
threaded elbowè K=30Ft Threaded Elbow

TFD-FD06 – Hydraulic Resistance Local (Minor!) Losses 22


Flow Resistance of Miter Bend
q Resistance of 90 degree Miter o
90 Miter
Bend è K=60Ft Bend

q Resistance of Non-90 degree


do
miter bend
Miter Angle K/Ft
Angle 0 2
15 4
30 8
45 15
60 25
75 40
o
Non-90 90 60
Miter Bend

TFD-FD06 – Hydraulic Resistance Local (Minor!) Losses 23


Resistance to Flow
Smooth Change in
Velocity & Flow Area
Diffuser with Gradual Expansion
Pressure Looses in a Diffuser
Effect of Diffuser Angle on Pressure Looses
Conical Expansion & Contraction
Converging Rectilinear Nozzle

TFD-FD06 – Hydraulic Resistance Local (Minor!) Losses 24


Diffuser - Gradual Expansion
Higher static pressure,
q A gradual tapered transition from potential energy A
2

one diameter to another can reduce A1 Higher velocity,


kinetic energy

flow losses appreciably in


comparison with abrupt transitions. P1 P2
α Jet
q In a conical diffuser the pressure
rises in the direction of flow P 1 < P2
§ Increasing diameter reduces the A1 Base area is A1
A2
velocity.
q Kinetic energy at cross section A1 is converted to potential energy at
cross section A2
q However the slower fluid particles near the diffuser wall tend to
stagnate and disturb the theoretical (ideal) pressure rise. This
causes an energy loss.
§ Total energy at section A2 is less than the total energy at section A1
TFD-FD06 – Hydraulic Resistance Local (Minor!) Losses 25
Pressure Losses in a Diffuser
q The resistance coefficients of q The effect of the Reynolds
the diffusers as well as the flow number on the resistance
structure in them and the coefficients of the diffusers is
separation phenomenon depend different for different
on many parameters such as divergence angles
§ Divergence angle, alpha
§ Area ratio
§ The shape of the velocity profile
at the entrance
§ Degree of flow turbulence at
the entrance
§ Flow regime, at the entrance
§ Flow compressibility

TFD-FD06 – Hydraulic Resistance Local (Minor!) Losses 26


Effect of Divergence Angle
In Gradual Expansion - Diffuser

q The total resistance coefficient of a diffuser expressed in terms of the


velocity at small section becomes smaller up to certain limits of
divergence angle, alpha.
§ Increase in the cross sectional area of the diffuser causes a drop in
average velocity.
§ Static pressure gain due to this cross sectional area change is greater
than the pressure loss due to flow turbulence up to certain limits of
divergence angle, alpha
q If the cone angle is too large, separation of the flow from the wall
also occurs and causes an additional energy loss.
q The most advantages cone angle is 8o degrees
q In flow channels of rectangular cross section, separation occurs if
cone angle alpha is greater than 10o

TFD-FD06 – Hydraulic Resistance Local (Minor!) Losses 27


Conical Expansion & Contraction
Higher static pressure,
q Expansion potential energy
A2
2
 α  A 
Higher velocity,
A1 kinetic energy
K Conical− Exp = 2.6 sin  1 − 1  ⇒ α < 45
 2  A2 
P2

 A 
2
α P1
Jet
Expansion
K Conical− Exp = 1 − 1  ⇒ α > 45
 A2  P 1 < P2
A1
A2
Base area is A1
q Contraction
 α  A 
K Conical−Contraction = 0.8 sin 1 − 1  ⇒ α < 45
 2  A2  A1 α A2
 α   A1 
K Conical−Contraction = 0.5 sin   1 −  ⇒ α > 45
 2   A2  Rectilinear
Converging Nozzle
TFD-FD06 – Hydraulic Resistance Local (Minor!) Losses 28
Gradual Contraction
Converging Nozzle

q In a convergent section flow losses are small since the


pressure gradient is in the same direction as the flow.
q Particles of fluid near the wall are continually accelerated
by this pressure gradient so that flow is maintained even
in the close vicinity of the wall.
q The resistance coefficient of a converging nozzle with
rectilinear boundaries at high Re numbers depends on:
§ Convergence angle alpha
§ Area ratio no=A2/A1<1
A1 α A2

Rectilinear
Converging Nozzle
TFD-FD06 – Hydraulic Resistance Local (Minor!) Losses 29
Flow Resistance of
Converging Rectilinear Nozzle

q At sufficiently large angles (alpha > 10o) and area ratios less than
0.3, the flow after passing from the contracting section of the
rectilinear converging nozzle to the straight part of the tube
separates from the walls which is the main source of the flow
losses.
§ The larger the alpha and smaller the area ratio, stronger is the flow
separation and greater the pressure losses
§ Pressure losses are at maximum for the limiting case of 180 degree
angle sudden contraction.

K Conv − Nozzle = ( −0.0125n04 + 0.022n03 − 0.00723n02 + 0.044n0 − 0.00745)


× (α 3 − 2πα 2 + 10α )

§ where alpha is in radians


• è 1 degree = (pi/180) = 0.01745 radians
TFD-FD06 – Hydraulic Resistance Local (Minor!) Losses 30
Resistance to Flow
at the Exit From Tubes

Uniform Velocity Distribution At Tube Exit


Exponential Velocity Distribution
Sinusoidal Velocity Distribution
Asymmetric Velocity Distribution

TFD-FD06 – Hydraulic Resistance Local (Minor!) Losses 31


Resistance of Exit Sections

q When fluid flow leaves the piping system, the kinetic energy of the
discharged jet is always lost.
q In the case of free discharge of the flow
from a straight section of the tube of ∆pvelocity
constant cross section into a large K= =N
1 ρv 2
volume, the total losses are reduced only to 2

the losses of the velocity pressure at the exit.


q The coefficient N depends on the nature of the velocity distribution
at the exit.
§ In the case of uniform exit velocity distribution, it is equal to unity
§ In the remaining cases where velocity distribution is non-uniform, it
always larger than one.
• Exponential, Parabolic, Sinusoidal, Asymmetric cases are some of the
non-uniform velocity distributions.
TFD-FD06 – Hydraulic Resistance Local (Minor!) Losses 32
Free Discharge From a Straight Tube
At Different Velocity Distributions

Uniform Velocity Distribution

∆p
K= =1
1 ρw 2
2 o

Exponential Velocity Distribution

∆p (2m + 1)3 (m + 1) 3
K= =
1 ρw 2
4 m 4
(2m + 3)(m + 3)
2 o

TFD-FD06 – Hydraulic Resistance Local (Minor!) Losses 33


Free Discharge From a Straight Tube
At Different Velocity Distributions

Sinusoidal Velocity Distribution in a plane tube

2
 ∆w 
K = 1 +  
 wo 

Asymmetrical Velocity Distribution in a plane tube

K = 3.67
w y
= 0.585 + 164 sin( 0.2 + 3.9 )
wo bo
TFD-FD06 – Hydraulic Resistance Local (Minor!) Losses 34
Resistance to Flow with
Sudden Change in Velocity

Orifice Plate
Orifice in A Straight Tube
Orifice with Beveled Inlet Edge
Orifice with Rounded Inlet Edge

TFD-FD06 – Hydraulic Resistance Local (Minor!) Losses 35


Orifice Plate
q Flow passage through the
opening is accompanied by the
distortion of the trajectories
of particles with the result that
they continue their motion by
inertia toward the axis of the
opening.
q This reduces the initial area jet
cross sectional area by a factor
alpha. (Vena contracta effect)
q Thickening, beveling and
rounding the orifice edges
reduces the effect of jet
contraction (reduced jet velocity
downstream of orifice plate) and
reduce pressure losses.
TFD-FD06 – Hydraulic Resistance Local (Minor!) Losses 36
Orifice In A Straight Tube
Sharp, Rounded & Beveled Edges
Idelchik Pg 222-224

2
 A   Ao 
0.375
  A1 
2

K Sharp−Orifice = 1 −  + 0.7071 − 


o
  
 A1   A1    Ao 

2
 A   Ao 
0.75

K Rounded −Orifice = 1 −  + ζ 1 − 
 o
 ′ 
 A1   A1  
r
−7.7
ζ ′ = 0.03 + 0.47 ×10
Dh o

2
 A   A 
0.375

K Beveled−Orifice = 1 − o  + ζ ′ 1 − o  
 A1   A1  

  l 
2.3 
 l 
− 3.4 D +88.4 D 
ζ ′ = 0.13 + 0.34 × 10  ho  ho

 
 Base area is Ao
Flow Thru Orifice
TFD-FD06 – Hydraulic Resistance Local (Minor!) Losses 37
Orifice In A Straight Tube
Thick Edge Orifice
Idelchik Pg 22-224

  A 0.75  A 1.375  A  2 fl 
K Thick − Edge = 0.51 − o  + τ 1 − o  + 1 − o  + 
  A1   A1   A1  Dh 

 8 
 0.25 + 0.535 l 
τ = (2.4 − l ) × 10
 0.05 + l 8 
 

Base area is Ao
Flow Thru Orifice

TFD-FD06 – Hydraulic Resistance Local (Minor!) Losses 38


Resistance to Flow Through
Barriers Uniformly Distributed
Over the Tube Cross Section
Circular Metal Wire
Threaded Screens
Two Plane Screens
Grating In Line with Flow
Gratings with an Angle of Attack

TFD-FD06 – Hydraulic Resistance Local (Minor!) Losses 39


Uniformly Distributed Barriers
q Barriers that are distributed uniformly over the tube or duct cross
sections create a uniform flow resistance.
q Types of barriers may include:
§ Perforated sheets (grids), screens, beds, fabrics, loose material,
crosswise bundles of tubes, etc.
q The flow resistance coefficient of a uniformly distributed barrier
depends on:
§ Shape of the barrier
§ Free area coefficient
§ Reynolds number
q Free area coefficient is defined as the percent clear area of the
barrier with respect to the upstream pipe area.
q Idelchik pg522 Aopen Ao
A free = =
Apipe−upstream A1
TFD-FD06 – Hydraulic Resistance Local (Minor!) Losses 40
Circular Metal Wire Screens
Idelchik Diagram 8.6 Pg 522

voδ m
Re = ≥ 103 A0 A1
µ KWire − Screen = 1.3(1 − ) + ( − 1) 2

A1 A0
50 < Re < 103 A0 A1
KWire − Screen = k11.3(1 − ) + ( − 1) 2
A1 A0
Re < 50 22 A0 A1
KWire − Screen = + 1.3(1 − ) + ( − 1) 2
Re A1 A0
Base area is Ao

Ao is open area on screen


A1 is pipe upstream flow area
TFD-FD06 – Hydraulic Resistance Local (Minor!) Losses 41
Two Plane & Silk Thread Screen
Idelchik Pg 523

q Two plane screen made from q Silk Thread Screen


bars of circular cross section
 Ao 
1 −  
K 2 Plane− Screen = 1.28  A1 
2
 Ao 
 
 A1 

K Silk −Threads = 1.62 KWire − Screen


Re > 500
Base area is Ao

TFD-FD06 – Hydraulic Resistance Local (Minor!) Losses 42


Gratings – In Line with Flow
Idelchik Pg 526

l a
q Special case of = 5 and o > 0.5
dm S1

K Grating = β1k1 sin θ


4
 S1  3
k1 =  − 1
Shape 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Beta1 2.34 1.77 1.77 1 0.87 0.71 1.73
 ao  Beta2 1 0.76 0.76 0.43 0.37 0.3 0.74

§ ao is flow space between gratings


§ S1 is pitch of gratings
Base area is Ao
§ l is length of gratings Flow Between
Gratings
§ dm is width of gratings
§ Beta1 is grating shape constant
§ Theta is angle of bar inclination with
respect to flow
TFD-FD06 – Hydraulic Resistance Local (Minor!) Losses 43
Gratings – In Line with Flow
Idelchik Pg 526

q Flow losses of grids made of bar gratings


with different cross sectional shapes consist:
§ Entrance loss
§ Frictional loss over the bars
§ Sudden expansion (shock) losses at the exit
l a
q Case of arbitrary and o
dm S1

K Grating = β 2 KThick −Grid sin θ


0.535 l 8
0.25 +
 l  0.05 +l 7
τ = 2.4 − 
 dh 
  Aopen 0.75  Aopen 1.375  Aopen  2 
l  open A
2

KThick −Grit = 0.51 −  + τ 1 −  + 1 −  + f  /  


  A1   A1   A1  d h   A1 

TFD-FD06 – Hydraulic Resistance Local (Minor!) Losses 44
Gratings with an Angle of Attack
q Reynolds number > 104 & a0/S1>0.5
K Grating = σ 1σ 2

TFD-FD06 – Hydraulic Resistance Local (Minor!) Losses 45


HYDRAULIC RESISTANCE
OF NETWORKS

TFD-FD06 – Hydraulic Resistance Local (Minor!) Losses 46


Hydraulic Resistance of Networks
q In flow networks, the portion of the total pressure which
is spent in overcoming the forces of hydraulic resistance
is irreversibly lost.
§ The molecular and turbulent viscosity of the moving medium
irreversibly converts the mechanical work of the resistance
forces into heat.
q There are two types of total pressure losses (hydraulic
resistance) in flow network (pipeline system)
§ Pressure losses resulting from friction (frictional drag)
§ Local pressure losses

TFD-FD06 – Hydraulic Resistance Local (Minor!) Losses 47


Friction Pressure Losses
q Fluid friction loss is due to the viscosity (both molecular
and turbulent) of fluids in motion
q Results from momentum transfer between the molecules
and individual particles of adjacent fluid layers moving in
different velocities
§ molecules in laminar flow
§ individual particles in turbulent flow

TFD-FD06 – Hydraulic Resistance Local (Minor!) Losses 48


Local Pressure Losses
q The local losses of total pressure are caused by
§ Local disturbance of the flow
§ Separation of flow from walls
§ Formation of vortices and strong turbulent agitation
• Entrance of a fluid into the pipeline
• Expansion, contraction, bending and branching of flow
• Flow through orifices, grids, valves
• Friction through porous media (filtration)
• Discharge of fluid into atmosphere or another reservoir

q All of these phenomena contribute to the exchange of


momentum between the moving fluid particles
§ Enhancing energy dissipation
§ Increasing total pressure loss
TFD-FD06 – Hydraulic Resistance Local (Minor!) Losses 49
Total Pressure Loss
Friction + Local Pressure Loss

q The total pressure losses in any complex fluids network are


inseparable. However, for ease of calculation they are arbitrarily
subdivided in each element of the pipeline (network)
§ Into frictional losses
§ Into local losses
q Total pressure loss for the fluid network is the summation of
pressure drops in each segment
all − segments
∆ptotal = ∑( 1
∆p friction + ∆plocal )
q The value of friction loss (relative to local pressure loss) is usually
taken into account for
§ Long branch pipes, diffusers with small divergence angles
§ Long fittings
TFD-FD06 – Hydraulic Resistance Local (Minor!) Losses 50
Units of Pressure Loss
q Head is energy per unit weight of fluid.
§ Force x Length / Weight

TFD-FD06 – Hydraulic Resistance Local (Minor!) Losses 51


References
q Handbook of Hydraulic Resistance 3rd Edition
I. E. Idelchik, CRC Begell House - 1994
q Fluid Mechanics
Dr. Walther Kaufmann, Mc Graw Hill – 1958
q Crane Co., Flow of Fluids Through Valves, Fittings, and
Pipe, Technical Paper No. 410, Crane Co., Joliet, IL,
1988.

TFD-FD06 – Hydraulic Resistance Local (Minor!) Losses 52


Appendix

TFD-FD06 – Hydraulic Resistance Local (Minor!) Losses 53


Appendix

TFD-FD06 – Hydraulic Resistance Local (Minor!) Losses 54


q The total resistance coefficient of a diffuser installed in a
flow network under any inlet condition can be expressed as
K Diffuser − L0 >0 = kd ζ Diffuser − L0 =0
Total Resistance Total Resistance
Coefficient of a Diffuser Coefficient of a Diffuser
with straight section L0/D0=0
installed upstream

 A  2  where
K Grad − Exp = η  2  − 1 ? = 0.15 − 0.2
 A1  
TFD-FD06 – Hydraulic Resistance Local (Minor!) Losses 55
Sudden Change in Velocity Idelchik Pg 217 Diagram 4-9

TFD-FD06 – Hydraulic Resistance Local (Minor!) Losses 56


Velocity Distribution for a Curved Bend
q Increase of the pressure at the Lower
pressure
EDDY ZONES:
Flow separates

outer wall and decrease at the higher


velocity
both at the inner
and outer walls

inner wall will create a flow


C D
velocity the lower at the altar Higher
wall and larger at the narrow pressure
lower
velocity A
B
q Before the straight section after the turn: Flow velocity will be
lower at the outer wall and larger at the inner wall.
§ Due to higher pressure at the outer wall & lower pressure inside.
q Downstream of turn - Straight section: Higher flow at the
outer wall and lower velocity at the inner wall.
q Secondary Flows:

TFD-FD06 – Hydraulic Resistance Local (Minor!) Losses 57


Derivation of Local Loss Coefficient
Sudden Expansion
q Local Loss Coefficient, Kexp
q From the momentum law:
K exp 12 v12 = ( −v22 + v2 v1 − 12 v12 + 12 v22 )
ΣFext = m& ∆v
( p1 − p2 ) A2 = ρQ(v2 − v1 ) K exp v12 = −2v22 + 2v2v1 − v12 + v22

( p1 − p2 ) A2 = ρA2v2 (v2 − v1 ) = −v22 + 2v2v1 − v12


( p1 − p2 ) = ρv2 (v2 − v1 ) = −(v2 − v1 ) 2
v2
q From Modified Bernoulli Eq.: = −v12 ( − 1) 2
v1
( p2− p1 ) = 12 ρ (v12 − v22 ) + K exp 12 ρv12 A1
K exp = −( − 1) 2
A2
q Eliminating (p2-p1) & rho
A1 2
− v2 (v2 − v1 ) = (v − v ) + K
1
2
2
1
2
2
1
exp 2
2
v
1
= (1 − )
A2
§ Ratio A1/A2 is less than 1.0

TFD-FD06 – Hydraulic Resistance Local (Minor!) Losses 58


Flow From A Vessel With Spout
q Momentum Equation Between sections e & a: Large Vessel Sharp Edged
§ Forces acting on the fluid must equal to the Spout
difference in momenta between fluid leaving
Stagnant Flow
and entering the section per unit time Region

( pe − po )A = ρAv(v − ve )
q Applying Bernoulli’s equation at sections e & a Spout
§ Pressure at e is pe including the stagnant flow
region

( pe − po ) = 1 2 ρ (v )
Contracting Jet
2
− v + K contraction
2
e Slow Expansion Until
Filling the Spout
q Combining both equations

TFD-FD06 – Hydraulic Resistance Local (Minor!) Losses 59


Orifice with Beveled Inlet Edge
In A Tube Transition Section Idelchik Pg 224

TFD-FD06 – Hydraulic Resistance Local (Minor!) Losses 60


Orifice with Rounded Inlet Edge
In A Tube Transition Section Idelchik Pg 224

TFD-FD06 – Hydraulic Resistance Local (Minor!) Losses 61

You might also like