Based on the report of further examination result (hereinafter referred to as " or LHPL "), Noted the

views of defence, letters, documents and other evidence, the Commission and the Council to assess
the presence or absence of misconduct has been reported in the event. The evaluation, the
Commission describes in some parts of the Council, namely: firstly, LHPL on offense, the person
Said, thirdly, formal aspects; Fourthly, the relevant market, market share, fifth, sixth, a point
Reported a violation of article 17, paragraph (1) and article 25, paragraph (1) of Act No. 5/1999;
seventh, infringement of article 28, paragraph (2) Law No. 5/1999; eighth, violate Article 20 of Law
No. 5 / 1999; ninth, conclusions, tenth, consideration before deciding; eleventh, suggestions and
considerations, the twelve, dictum verdict and cover .--------------- - -
----------------------------------------------- - - - 1. About Breach
LHPL ;---------------------------------------------- --------------- Regarding Reported violation by the Team in
LHPL essentially stated that the Party has done monopolistic practices, abuse of dominant position, and
make the acquisition of shares resulting in monopolistic practices and healthy through the acquisition of
PT unfair business . Alfa Retailindo Tbk. (Hereinafter called the "Alfa"). On that basis, the Team
concluded that the Party has violated Article 17 paragraph (1), Article 25 paragraph (1) letter a, and
Article 28 paragraph (2) of Law no. 5 of 1999 and not to investigate further to Article 20 of Law no. 5,
1999; --------------------
2. reported identity (vide C144, C145)

2.1 Reported in this case is PT. Carrefour Indonesia, a legal entity incorporated under the laws of
Indonesia, in accordance with the Deed PT Carrefour Indonesia, namely the Deed No. 18 dated August
11, 2008, executed before Notary & PPAT Siaril Merry Susanti, SH, which is currently in Carrefour in
Building 3rd Floor, Jl. Lebak Bulus Raya No. 8, South Jakarta ;-------------------------------- 12 310 2.2 It
was reported originally founded in 1998 by opening its first outlet in Cempaka Putih. In 1999 Reported
inaugurate three other outlets in Jakarta, which in Duta Merlin, Pluit and Cempaka
Mas ;---------------------------- 2.3 In 1999, reported by the amalgamation (merger) with the Continent
and the opening of the outlet Ratu Plaza as the first outlet opened after the merger; -------------------- ----
- -------------------------------------------- ---- - 2.4 Carrefour is the result of a merger between PT.
Contimas Utama Indonesia (PT. Cui) with (PT. CPI) and PT. Carti Satria Megaswalayan (PT CSM) into
force on December 23, 2003. In this case PT. Cui act as receiver of the Company Merger (the surviving
entity) and changed its name to PT. Carrefour Indonesia; -----
2.5.PT.CUI is built 178 dated November 29, 1995 and are legally established as a limited
liability company from the date of March 6, 1996 ;--------------------------- -----
------------------ 2.6 PT. CPI was established based on Deed No. 32 dated June 28, 1996 and
legally established as a limited company since 2 September 1996; ------ 7.2 PT. CSM
legitimate standing as a Limited Company since February 6, 1996 and amended by deed of
change No. 87 dated March 5, 1998 ;-------------------- ------ ------------------
----------------------- 02/08 shareholding structure. Carrefour Indonesia are as follows:
-------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------- 2.8.1 Carrefour SA
(France) at 66 , 72% ---------------------------------- 2.8.2 Carrefour Nederland BV
(Netherlands) at 21.81 %, and - -------------- 2.8.3 onesia BV (Netherlands) at 11:47 am
%------------------- --- --- -------------
3. Formal Aspects; ------------------- 3.1 Prior to the Assembly Commission to assess and conclude the
main things (material aspect), the Assembly Commission to assess in advance the opinion or
defense Reported on matters unrelated to the substantive aspects of this case; ------- --- ---
-------------------------------------------- 3.2 --- --- ---------------- opinion or defense, is reported
essentially stated that the Investigation Team did not examine all evidence, documents, and
testimony of the Party, Team Party only for calls to as many as 3 (three) times, teams only use 6
(six) point quotation information from Party, Tim did not respond to a request from the Party to
conduct a special meeting to discuss more intensive in this case; --- -------- -
-------------------------------------- 3.3 Relative to the above, the level of Assembly Commission as
follows: ------------------------------------ ---------- -------------------------------------- 3.3. 1 Evidence,
document and “keterangan terlapor”.sesuai dengan Pasal 4 Peraturan Komisi
Pengawas Persaingan Usaha Nomor 1 Tahun 2006 Tentang Tata Cara
Penanganan Perkara Di KPPU (“Perkom No. 1 Tahun 2006”)
mempunyai tugas untuk mendapatkan pengakuan Terlapor berkaitan
dengan dugaan pelanggaran yang dituduhkan dan/atau mendapatkan