Professional Documents
Culture Documents
11-04-08 Ex Parte Applications for Due Process and Statement by California Judge Peter J
Meeka RE: Financial Benefits to Him by Bank of America
Attached:
# Date Record Page #
1. April 8, 2011 Minutes, as received from the Clerk 3
2. April 8, 2011 Receipt for payment for the Minutes 4
3. April 8, 2011 Ex Parte Application for a Statement on the Record by Judge 5
Meeka regarding Financial Benefits, if any, to him, from Bank
of America
4. April 8, 2011 Ex Parte Application for Due Process: Notice and Service of 12
Minutes, certified by the Clerk, and for access to the Register of
Actions (California civil docket) to inspect and to copy
In Lomas v Bank of America (KC059379) in the Superior Court of California, County of Los
Angeles, Plaintiff Susan Lomas is trying to protect her rights through a Quiet Title action against
alleged fraud by Bank of America and others in foreclosure procedures.
The case is opined as Fraud on the Court through collusion of BANK OF AMERICA
CORPORATION, California Judge PETER MEEKA, Clerk of the Court JOHN A CLARKE,
and Attorney MARK ASDOURIAN aimed to dispossess Plaintiff Susan Lomas, while denying
her due process and access to an honest court.
A pattern of false and deliberately misleading court records is found in the case: [ i ]
• None of the minutes were certified by the Deputy Clerk of the Court;
• None of the minutes were noticed and served by the Court;
z Page 2/2 April 12, 2011
• Multiple proceedings were secretly listed in the minutes as "off of the record";
• No Initial Case Management Conference was ever held;
• Plaintiff has been repeatedly denied access to the Register of Actions (California civil
docket), where the true registration of the proceedings (or lack thereof) would be discerned;
• An invalid online "Case Summary" is published by the Court, which would lead a naive
reader to conclude that valid and effectual proceedings have been held and rulings have been
entered by the court.
• Attorney Mark Asdourian appears in the case for BofA, while refusing to provide certificate
of Attorney of Record. Attorney Asdourian has filed false and deliberately misleading
banking records as "Request for Judicial Notice", which was granted by Judge Peter Meeka.
• No declaration or any other record signed by Bank of America authorized person was ever
filed in the case.
Such conduct is inconsistent with the Bank of America Code of Ethics and the Bank of America
Outside Counsel Procedures, which prohibit appearances by unauthorized attorneys and
obstructionist conduct in litigation. [ii ]
Such conduct should also be deemed deprivation of Human, Constitutional, and Civil Rights of
Susan Lomas, through collusion by Judge Peter J Meeka, Clerk John A Clarke, and Bank of
America Corporation.
i
11-03-20 PRESS RELEASE Lomas v Bank of America (KC059379) Bank of America Continues Racketeering in
the Los Angeles Superior Court
Hhttp://www.scribd.com/doc/51160102/H
11-03-20 Lomas v Bank of America (KC059379) in the Superior Court of California County of Los Angeles online
“Case Summary” and Minutes
Hhttp://www.scribd.com/doc/51157264/H
11-04-05 Lomas v Bank of America (KC059379) in the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles –
Fraud on the Court in a Quiet Title Action
Hhttp://www.scribd.com/doc/52336989/H
11-04-06 Lomas v Bank of America (KC059379) “Request[s] for Judicial Notice”- Additional Evidence of Fraud on
the Court in Foreclosure Procedure s
Hhttp://www.scribd.com/doc/52420585/H
11-04-07 Press Release: Lomas v BofA (KC059379) – Judge Meeka is Requested to Restore Due Process,
Declare Any Benefits from BofA
Hhttp://www.scribd.com/doc/52494342/H
11-03-31 Lomas v Bank of America (KC059379) Request and Response for Certification of Authority as Attorney
of Record s
Hhttp://www.scribd.com/doc/52516705/H
ii
09-01-27 Bank of America Code of Ethics
Hhttp://www.scribd.com/doc/32173783/H
08-12-11 Bank of America - Outside Counsel Procedures
Hhttp://www.scribd.com/doc/27932516/
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
Plaintiff
Counsel
Defendant
Counsel
NATURE OF PROCEEDINGS:
MINUTES ENTERED
Page 1 of 1 DEPT. 00/00/00
COUNTY CLERK
CIT/CASE~ LEA/DEF# ~
0310
CA~:~H ~ Oc50
CHANGE ~
CAPD~
-- ----------- ----
- -
/
Susan Lomas
ORIGINAL FILED
1 2528 Kendall Street APR X8 2011
La Verne, CA 91750
2
Telephone: (323) 533-5242 ~OS AN'GELES
3 SUPE.RIOR COURT
4
5
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
6
IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, EAST DISTRICT
8
SUSAN LOMAS, an individual; KC 059379 0
9
SUSAN LOMAS, Trustee of the
Michael A. Heredia and Susan Lomas Assigned for all purposes to the
10
Joint Living Trust Dated January 22, Honorable
2008 Peter J. Meeka
11
EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR A
12 Plaintiff, STATEMENT ON THE RECORD BY
JUDGE PETER J. MEEKA PURSUAN
13
Vs. TO THE CALIFORNIA CODE OF
JUDICIAL ETHICS CANON 3E(2)
14 REGARDING FINANCIAL BENEf=IT ,
BANK OF AMERICA, National IF ANY, BY BANK OF AMERICA,
15 Association as successor by merger to AFFILIATES, SUBSIDIARIES,
La Salle Bank National Association, as EXECUTIVES, OR EMPLOYEES TO
16 JUDGE PETER J. MEEKA OR FAMIL
Trustee for the C-BASS Mortgage
Loan Asset-Backed Certificates, MEMBER(S) RESIDING WITH HIM.
17
Series, 2006-CB7; DOES 1-20, DATE: 04- O~· ]..01\
18 inclusive TIME: ~ f3~ ?Oflfi'l
DEPT: 0
19
Defendants.
20
21
22
24 Record by Judge PETER J. MEEKA pursuant to the California Code of Judicial Ethics
25 3E(2).
26 This ex parte application is based upon the attached Memorandum of Points and
27 Authorities, the declarations of Lomas filed and served herewith, the pleadings and
28 documents on record in this case, all matters of which the Court mayor must take
judicial notice, and on such other oral and documentary evidence as may be presented
1
at the hearing.
2
5 BY:~
6
Susan Lomas
7
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Ex Parte Application for a Statement on the Record by Judge Meeka pursuant to the California Code of Judicial Ethics
3E(2)
2
------
MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES
1
2
I. SUSAN LOMAS REQUESTS A STATEMENT ON THE RECORD BY
3
JUDGE PETER J. MEEKA PURSUANT TO THE CALIFORNIA CODE
4
OF JUDICIAL ETHICS, CANON 3E(2)
5
The California Code of Judicial Ethics, Canon 3E (1) and (2) states:
6
E. Disqualification.
7 (1) Ajudge shall disqualify himself or herself in any proceeding in which
disqualification is required by law.
8 (2) In all trial court proceedings, a judge shall disclose on the record
information that is reasonably relevant to the question of disqualification
under Code of Civil Procedure section 170.1, even if the judge believes there is
9
no actual basis for disqualification.
10 II. BANK OF AMERICA IS PARTY TO INSTANT LITIGATION
11 BANK OF AMERICA, National Association as successor by merger to La Salle
12 Bank National Association, as Trustee for the C-BASS Mortgage Loan Asset-
13 Backed Certificates, Series, 2006-CB7 is named Defendant in instant litigation.
14 III. CONCLUSION
15 For the foregoing reasons, Plaintiff Susan Lomas respectfully asks the Judge
16 PETER J. MEEKA to file a Statement on the Record regarding financial benefits, if any,
17 to Judge PETER J. MEEKA or any family members residing with him, by Bank of
18 America Corporation, or by any of its subsidiaries, affiliates, executives, or employees.
19
20 Respectfully submitted,
21
DATED: 0 ~ --0 lJ '-1O~l
22
23
By:
24
Susan Lomas
25
26
27
28
Ex Parte Application for a Statement on the Record by Judge Meeka pursuant to the California Code of Judicial Ethics
3E(2)
3
DECLARAliON OF SUSAN LOMAS
1
6 Joint Living Trust Dated January 22, 2008 vs. BANK OF AMERICA,
16
Loan Asset-Backed Certificates, Series, 2006-CB7; DOES 1-20, inclusive
17
18 I declare under the penalty of perjury under the law of the State of California
19
that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed this 5th day of April 2011 in, La
20
Verne, California.
21
22
23
24
Signature: ~
25
26
27
28
Ex Parte Application for a Statement on the Record by Judge Meeka pursuant to the California Code of Judicial Ethics
3E(2)
4
PROOF OF SERVICE
9
_-=--X-=- (BY FAX) I transmitted, via facsimile, said document(s) to the telecopier
10 numbers: 949-644-5301 ~ qt.f!1 (,41.( ~ 530 I
11 Mark Asdourian @
Mark Asdourian Esq.,
12 610 Newport Center Drive, #1250
Newport Beach, CA 92660
13
14 (BY MAIL) I am "readily familiar" with this office's practice of collection and
processing correspondence for mailing. Under that practice it would be
15 deposited with U.S. postal service on that same day with postage thereon
fully prepaid at Los Angeles, California in the ordinary course of business. I
16 am aware that on motion of the party served, service is presumed invalid if
postal cancellation date or postage meter date is more than one day after
17 date of deposit for mailing in affidavit.
21 (BY EMAIL) I emailed a .pdf file containing and image of said document(s)
to the addressee at the email address listed above.
22
23 I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California
that the above is true and correct.
24
Executed on, April 6, 2011, Glendora, California.
25
26 ~~~
27 Anna Cheek
28 Ex Parte Application Re: Due Process Service And Notice,
Access To Register Of Actions
6
-----~
1 TO ALL PARTIES AND THEIR ATTORNEY OF RECORD:
8
Please take notice that on Friday, April 8, 2001 at 9:00 am as soon
9
thereafter this matter - EX PARTE APPLICATION STATEMENT OF THE RECORD
10
BY JUDGE PETER JOSEPH MEEKA PURSUANT TO THE CALIFORNIA CODE
11
OF JUDICIAL ETHICS C~NON 3E (2) REGARDING FINANCIAL BENEFITS,IF
12
ANY BY BANK OF AMERICA, AFFILIATES, SUBSIDIARIES, EXECUTIVES OR
13 EMPLOYEES TO JUDGE PETER J. MEEKA OR FAMILY MEMBERS(S)
14 RESIDING WITH HIM. On case number KC 059379 0, in Department 0 of the
15 Pomona Courthouse located at 400 Civic Center Plaza, Pomona, CA 91766.
16 Plaintiff Susan Lomas will be heard.
17
18
19
20 Dated: () q ~O(P ~ 10 ~,
21 Susan Lomas
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
PAGE
TRANSMISSION VERIFICATION REPORT
11
27
28
PLAINTIFF SUSAN LOMAS hereby applies ex parte for an order for Due Process
1
notice and service of entry of minutes, rulings, orders, judgment, or of any other
2
developments in this case, including signed certificates of entry by the Clerk of the Court,
3
and for an order for Due Process access to the Register of Actions in this case, to inspect
4
and to cqpy. This application is ba?ed upon the fact that Lomas has never been noticed
5
and served so far by the Clerk of the Court of any of the Minutes in this case, and that
6
copies of Minutes in this case, obtained by Lomas from the Office of the Clerk were
7
missing the Certificate of Entry by Clerk. This application is also based upon the fact that
·8
Lomas has been so far denied access to the Register of Actions in this case, to inspect
9
and to copy.
10
This ex parte application is based upon the attached Memorandum of Points and
11
Authorities, the declarations of Lomas filed and served herewith, the pleadings and
12
documents on record in this case, all matters of which the Court mayor must take judicial
13
notice, and on such other oral and documentary evidence as may be presented at the
14
hearing.
15
18
19
SUSAN LOMAS
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
14 However, Lomas has been denied repeated requests to access the Register of
15 Actions in instant case, with no explanation at all. (Lomas Declaration., 11 Exhibit A.)
16 Lomas should not have to speculate regarding the nature of court actions in this
19 Judgments, as certified by the Clerk of the Court, is clear and arises from the Fourteenth
21
II. DESPITE MULTIPLE ATTEMPTS, LOMAS WAS DENIED ACCESS TO THE
22 REGISTER OF ACTIONS IN THE CASE, TO INSPECT AND TO COPY
23 Not only was Lomas given no notice and seNice of Minutes, certified as entered by
24 the Clerk of the Court, she was also denied the opportunity to learn on her own the
25 specifics of Court actions in instant case, through review of the Register of Actions.
27 Lomas attempted on March PI, 4 th , 7th , and April 4 th _ 2011 to access the Register of
6
III. CONCLUSION
7
For the foregoing reasons, Plaintiff Susan Lomas respectfully asks the Court to rule
8
that the Clerk of the Court immediately provide Lomas copies of any Minutes, Orders,
9
Rulings, Judgments in this case, including Certificates of Entry by the Clerk, if any exist.
10
Moreover, Plaintiff Lomas respectfully asks the Court to rule that that Clerk of the
11
Court immediately provide Lomas access to the Register of Actions in the case, to inspect
12
and to copy.
13
14
Respectfully submitted,
15
DATED: 0 L( ~O~· "'UJ t\
16
17
By:
18
Susan Lomas
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28 Eyh,-b,"+ A
5
-
DECLARATION OF SUSAN LOMAS
Susan Lomas
---------~ --
1 TO ALL PARTIES AND THEIR ATTORNEY OF RECORD:
8
Please take notice that on Friday, April 8, 2001 at B: 3D, am as soon
9
thereafter this matter - EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR DUE PROCESS NOTICE
10
AND SERVICE OF MINUTES, RULINGS, ORDERS, JUDGMENT, WITH ENTRY
11
CERTIFIED BY THE CLERK, and ACCESS TO THE REGISTER OF ACTIONS,
12
TO INSPECT AND TO COpy on case number KC 059379 0, in Department 0 of
13
the Pomona Courthouse located at 400 Civic Center Plaza, Pomona, CA 91766.
14
Plaintiff Susan Lomas will be heard.
15
16
17
18 Dated:
19 Susan Lomas
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
PAGE
------ -------
PROOF OF SERVICE
8
_-,--X-,- (BY FAX) I transmitted, via facsimile, said document(s) to the telecopier
9 numbers: 949-644- 53 of ' qyOJ {'lf4, 5"~o \
10 Mark Asdourian @
Mark Asdourian Esq.,
11 610 Newport Center Drive, #1250
Newport Beach, CA 92660
12
13 (BY MAIL) I am "readily familiar" with this office's practice of collection and
processing correspondence for mailing. Under that practice it would be
14 deposited with U.S. postal service on that same day with postage thereon
fully prepaid at Los Angeles, California in the ordinary course of business. I
15 am aware that on motion of the party served, service is presumed invalid if
postal cancellation date or postage meter date is more than one day after
16 date of deposit for mailing in affidavit.
22 I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California
that the above is true and correct.
23
Executed on, April 6, 2011, Glendora, California.
24
26 Anna Cheek
27
._-------
TRANSMISSION VERIFICATION REPORT