Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use, available at .
http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp. JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use provides, in part, that unless
you have obtained prior permission, you may not download an entire issue of a journal or multiple copies of articles, and you
may use content in the JSTOR archive only for your personal, non-commercial use.
Please contact the publisher regarding any further use of this work. Publisher contact information may be obtained at .
http://www.jstor.org/action/showPublisher?publisherCode=jhup. .
Each copy of any part of a JSTOR transmission must contain the same copyright notice that appears on the screen or printed
page of such transmission.
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of
content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms
of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
The Johns Hopkins University Press and American Society for Eighteenth Century Studies (ASECS) are
collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Eighteenth-Century Studies.
http://www.jstor.org
64OOK REVIEWS
Edited by Clorinda Donato and Carl Fisher
century Spain. Both men and women during this period were concerned, perhaps
even obsessed, with gender, interrogating themselves and their colleagues about
the physical, emotional, and intellectual differences between men and women,
the culturally acceptable roles for each, and what it meant to be a man or a wom-
an. Both Bolufer and Haidt insightfully explore the underlying anxieties articulat-
ed in these queries, and both come to similar conclusions about the over-arching
importance of gender to the Spanish Enlightenment.
Monica Bolufer calls Spain's eighteenth century a "crossroads" between
traditionalist views of the physical, intellectual, and emotional inferiority of women,
and a new way of understanding femininity. She finds the question of woman (la
querella de las mujeres)-as expressed by both men and women, conservatives
and liberals, in a variety of literary, political, medical, pedagogic and journalistic
texts-to be a central point of conflict of what she calls the "cultural debate" of
the eighteenth century. Beginning in the first part of her book with the early intel-
lectual debates-notably the famous essay by Benito Feijoo, Defensa de las mujeres
(Defense of Women, 1727) and the controversy surrounding it-Bolufer shows
how the querella de las mujeres dispelled ideas of women's supposed inferiority.
However, even after Feijoo, support for women's rights was still based more in
male self-interest than in a belief in real gender parity. Later in the century, when
the sensibility cult entered the gender debate, Rousseauian idealized domestic
femininity overshadowed previous notions of women as potential intellectual or
even political equals to their male counterparts, proscribing them to certain ways
of feeling, thinking, and behaving. In the second part of her book, Bolufer exam-
ines contemporary pedagogical and medical texts about women. She shows how
by the end of the century, women's education was seen as valuable to male ilustra-
dos insofar as it would benefit society by fitting them for motherhood. The fash-
ion-obsessed petimetra was criticized by these writers and countered by the posi-
tive image of the buena madre (the good mother). Although male writers about
female education saw only societal benefits for educating women, female writers
viewed their gender's education differently, seeing it as personal: "un instrumento
por el cual las mujeres podian satisfacer su ambici6n" (an instrument through
which women could satisfy their ambition, 133).
Although male writings are a large part of Bolufer's sources, she also
turns to texts by women, especially Josefa Amar y Borb6n and Ines Joyes y Blake.
In part three of her book, Bolufer examines the presence of real women in Span-
ish Enlightenment culture as readers and writers, spectators and participants, in
Spain's growing culture of reform. As part of the battle between public and pri-
vate spheres for women-between acceptance of women as active intellectuals
and the preference for the image of the domestic angel-came the controversy
over women's admission to the Royal Economic Society of Madrid in 1787. In-
stead of being accepted into the male body as equal members, a Junta de Damas
(Ladies Group) was created for them. Bolufer sees in the creation of this separate,
and not quite equal, civic space for women, a difficult solution to the public
versus private debate. Women were given a sort of honorary citizenship in the
new Spanish Enlightenment society, but one which would not be extended to
other arenas. A few decades later, when the first Spanish constitution was being
formed in Cadiz, women were not only not invited to join the constitutional con-
gress (formed of numerous former members of Madrid's economic society), they
were forbidden from even witnessing the proceedings. Citizenship, concludes
Bolufer, would only be conjugated in the masculine (370).
REVIEWS 579