GGM3 A1 HB

GGM2 - Proto-type Design - with recursive wiring & electret
GGM3.A.1Hb.doc--- 5/5/2011
This is transition, and various parts are new, while other parts are older. The first goal is to bring all the data into the document.
Next I must go through and bring the older parts into agreement with the new research and concept development.
Table of Contents
Table of Contents ................................................................................................................................................................ 1
GGM1 - Block Diagram........................................................................................................................................................ 2
GGM2 - Proto-type Design - recursive wiring & electret ........................................................................................................... 3
Optional Virtual Stator-Bars .................................................................................................................................................. 4
Diagrams: showing optional virtual stator bar arms ............................................................................................................. 4
Recursive Coil Wiring with Electret as diode........................................................................................................................... 4
INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................................................. 5
GGM2 - Document Group Development............................................................................................................................ 5
GGM1 & GGM2 Goals ......................................................................................................................................................... 6
The goal is: Simple & Safe................................................................................................................................................ 6
GGM2 R&D Objectives......................................................................................................................................................... 6
1. Primary Design Specification ..................................................................................................................................... 6
2. Primary Design Prototype .......................................................................................................................................... 6
3. Amended Design Specification................................................................................................................................... 6
4. Publish Design ......................................................................................................................................................... 6
5. Reproduce Results/Manufacture Device: .................................................................................................................... 6
Simulation Theorized............................................................................................................................................................ 6
GGM1 & GGM2 Potential ..................................................................................................................................................... 7
Assumptions Identified ......................................................................................................................................................... 8
Questions, design requirements ............................................................................................................................................ 8
Modularized R&D Tests Required ......................................................................................................................................... 9
1. Coils: can we improvise off the shelf automobile coils.................................................................................................... 10
2. Coils : must we custom create our ............................................................................................................................ 10
3. RSW: What must our coils have in circuit to work?..................................................................................................... 10
4. Spark Gap/ Oscillator: ............................................................................................................................................. 11
5. Electret: ................................................................................................................................................................. 13
Definition of GGM1 ............................................................................................................................................................ 14
Definition of GGM1 ............................................................................................................................................................ 14
Vince – Notes – comments & observations .......................................................................................................................... 15
Electrets – Questions ......................................................................................................................................................... 17
Electret Answers - Marc P .................................................................................................................................................. 18
GMM1A.5a.doc comments - Marc P ................................................................................................................................... 19
Autotransformer - Operating principles................................................................................................................................. 21
Winding configurations ....................................................................................................................................................... 23
Phasing ............................................................................................................................................................................ 26
Voltage regulation.............................................................................................................................................................. 28
Spherical Magnet - rotating magnetic beacon as core coil – John Lord ................................................................................... 30
THE MEISSNER EFFECT .............................................................................................................................................. 31
George – advice, comments, questions - NEW: October 12 2009........................................................................................... 33
1
GGM3.A.1Hb.doc--- 5/5/2011
GGM1 - Block Diagram

1. First letter is S for stator, or R for rotor.
2. Second letter is a P for primary, or S for secondary (if coil).
3. Third C is used for coil, or PM for magnet.
4. The end of these labels is an id number
The green ‘box’ around rotor components is envisioned to be a cylinder to encase these parts.
Scale is not accurate or well defined – although GG suggested that the thrust coils be far from the steel axel rod.
Also – magnet is shown with N side facing primary coil – an edge may be better – N with approach & S as it passes coil.
2
GGM2.A.1h.Doc July, 09 - 2009
GGM2 - Proto-type Design - recursive wiring & electret

Diagrams: GGM2 Proto-type Test Frame
Using two ‘virtual stator bars’ allows for

a simple to create test platform, to
refine the design, make adjustments
fast and inexpensively, and
incrementally test components, without
the need to build a typical stator-tube
shell with exacting specifications; this
simple proto-type framework safely will
allow analysis for final product design.
It uses two 4x4 uprights to anchor the
rotor axel, and has two slots in each
4x4 and to adjustably mound two 2x4
boards to serve as an upper & lower
‘virtual stator bar’, each with the stator
components attached.
This allows easy speed control and a

manner to stop the device by
separating physically the rotor and
stator components - by sliding them
away from the center rotor. [See
drawing at right – with two virtual stator
bars only]
This basic test (proto-type) platform

also allows easy addition of two more
similar sets of ‘virtual stator bars’ (using
2x4 frames), each frame will pivot
adjustably on the rotor axel, to allow
testing of a variety of very precise
differential spacing, in order to
experiment with natural differentials.
These additional virtual-stator frames
[see drawing below] would also three
fold the frequency of repulsive force
applied to the rotor with a given RPM.
This configuration allows six sets
(primary & secondary) of stator coils
instead of the two sets shown to the
right. This is accomplished easily by
adding a wooden frame (or two) that
pivots around the rotor shaft, and allows placement of additional stator components attached to the virtual-stator arms in a similar manner as
those affixed to the horizontal 2x4 wood boards in the image above – except the initial virtual-stator bars are fixed at a 12:00 o’clock and 6:00
o’clock position (perfectly symmetrical), and these additional virtual stator arms would be easily adjustable to be positioned asymmetrically.
[See side view drawing below] Also: it may be easier and less costly to lay the 4x4s down horizontally – clamped to two tables for example.
3
Optional Virtual Stator-Bars
Diagrams: showing optional virtual stator bar arms

Primary Virtual Stator Bars (VSB) with side view of two optional VSBs
&
Two primary and Four Optional Virtual Stator Bars
This prototype test frame [See drawings above} is suited for differential testing; differentials may enhance the initial system which has stator components
stationary at the 12:00 o’clock and 6:00 o’clock positions – perfectly symmetrical - by creating two additional pivotal frames upon which can be mounted
additional sets of stator components. These two additional Virtual Stator Bar Assemblies could then be fitted with additional stator components which can be
swiveled and positioned to experiment with precise asymmetrical lineal distances around the virtual circumference of the rotating rotor components – See
David Sereda who found increased efficiency using asymmetrical placement of magnets in such devices. Note: these additional virtual stator arms will be
easy to remove in order to experiment with the simplest original design, as shown in the drawing above
Recursive Coil Wiring with Electret as diode
This block diagram [to the right] is the proposed wiring diagram interconnecting two sets of coils – each is an auto-coil, a
special type of stepup transformer with a primary and secondary coil. [both the rotor and the stator have two auto-coils
each – and each of these coils has both a primary and secondary coiil] This diagram shows a total of four
interconnected coils, two primary and two secondary coils – in an auto-coil design 1) in which the secondary coil
windings share the primary winding also, 2) it charges as an inductive- capacitor with a milli-second charge-time delay
between the time power is applied to the primary and the secondary is fully charegd, 3 ) the HV output of the stepup
transformer (secondary coil) is recursively fed back into the primary coil of the second coil set (Recursive Wiring
Scheme - RWS), 4) the symbol between the HV output of the secondary and the input of the companion primary coil is
an electret: this special device acts as a self charging capacitor with a HV output, has a polarity, and allows DC current
to flow in only one direction – note the arrow – to prevent reverse voltage to flow back into the high voltage secondary
coil from a low voltage primary coil. [Note: How to wire these is discussed below in Modularized Tests]
[note – this is highly speculative still and requires testing as described below] This concept is likely unique and is
perhaps a patentable idea – if it works in application. This recursive wiring schematic also may be unique and
patentable. Perment magnets passing both primary coils at the same time, charge the primaries, and a milli-second later the seccondaries are charged, as
the passing permenant magnet is far enough away to ‘trigger’ the secondary – as though power to the primary is turned off – and this change powers the
secondary coils, which provide torsion trhust as two electro-magnets repel with great force. The electret also provides HV power to the syetem. This wiring
schematic feeds HV into the primary of both of these auto-coils – results of this are unknown experimentally. Also, the behavior of the electret is also
unknown, both short term and long term. Differential component placment to gain efficency is also a possible patententable feature of GGM2. Optionally –
can HV output be fed into a stepdown transformer to power primaries ?
4
INTRODUCTION
GGM1: every sentence was perfectly structured and symmetrical with all other sentences, and the paragraphs also correlated perfectly. I determined to
follow the Definition to the letter, make no assumptions yet – but identify them; also identify all unknowns, and then list options and their qualities.
The Definition herein hereafter referred to as GGM1 (above) is unedited. GGM2 is an enhanced version of this very simple concept by George Gray –
invention from 1955
GGM2 - Document Group Development

All suggestions properly submitted are welcome: one thing is important however – send changes back with a different name – add a prefix to
the document name so edits do not clobber and destroy any others changes – this is easy to do with a simple rule – add your initials to end of
the document name so it is easy to identify it as unique and identifiable as yours. (for example I would take this version GMM1A.3c.doc , and
send it back to the coordinator as GMM1A.3c.vjc.doc) No efforts will be accepted without such compliance. The Project coordinator takes all
edits and compiles them into a master (new) version, and then increments the file name (to GMM1A.3d.doc for example) before sending it out
again. I will begin as the Project Coordinator. Alternatively: anyone with Word can edit this document – with Tracking enabled – and all
changes should be easy to find and incorporate into the final document. – With editor overview.
5
GGM1 & GGM2 Goals
The goal is: Simple & Safe
1. Make a simple device as defined in GGM1. & then 3. Make it so it does not require precision parts, assembly, or
enhance with GGM2 design concepts operational requirements.
2. Make it simple to create, repair, and operate. Make it safe 4. Make it inexpensive to design, create, test, and operate.
GGM2 R&D Objectives
1. Primary Design Specification: d. Create Rotor Tube

a. Document the Concept e. Create Rotor Coils
b. Identify Unknowns to test
c. Design Stand alone tests
f. Create Stator Coils
d. Perform Stand Alone Tests g. Assemble Stator Component Blocks
e. Document Stand alone Test results h. Assemble Rotor Tube components
f. Develop Theory of how/if it it can work
g. Refine Documentation 3. Amended Design Specification:
2. Primary Design Prototype: 4. Publish Design

a. Create the basic Frame
b. Mount Bearings 5. Reproduce Results/Manufacture Device:
c. Machine Axle from hex stock
Simulation Theorized
In the most exact reading of GGM1 adding & assuming nothing - and using a straight forward recursive wiring approach - I see this:
1. Turn the rotor by hand - spinning the flywheel, and the power is generated as the magnets pass all the coils (6 o’clock & 12 o’clock); all four sets of
coils are charged at the same time virtually, the primaries are charged fast and the four secondaries are charged in a millisecond or so (design for
needs).
2. The secondaries mostly (and the primaries also) repel as they are 180 degrees opposed vertically – so if all were wound clockwise – the coils
which were inverted must oppose the coils that are right side up. The gauss gradient is stretched as the magnets pass, and then Snaps OFF (fast),
causing great voltage amplification which is directly proportionate to the speed of the SNAP – and speed is conversely determined by the voltage
dependant repelling force; additionally, the auto-coil is a step up transformer so things are ratcheted up a magnitude when this happens the second
time during this first revolution.
3. I see a possible simple toroid such as a simple soft iron rod or bar, slid into a slot on the stator for adjusting the reach of the PMs and syncing the
HV discharge of the secondaries which charge the primaries, and perhaps attracting the coils which should now be running with reverse current
powered by back EMF from the immediate last excited moment; a design that can easily be used to extend the reach of the magnet to the coil and thus
delay the SNAP OFF moment. A second option would be to put the primary ½ inch or so ‘ahead’ of the secondary coils – however this adjustment may
be adjustment of the could design by increasing the charge potential and its’ charge delay – milli-second – which may be just enough to get the two
secondary (thrust coils past TDC and force a ‘continuation’ of same rotation of spin – this idea would force the motor work in only one direction most
efficiently.
4. Tests must be designed to cheaply test to see if this is a workable wiring design. Alternatively, it is possible to create a step-down transformer coil
(or set) to reduce the HV output and subsequently feed this into the primaries – or tap the stator to charge batteries or drive inductive loads. Again, an
auto-transformer used as a step down transformer before ‘consuming the voltage, may be important and beneficial.
6
GGM2.A.2a.Doc --- July, 06, 2009
5. Can we build a primary that will allow an input of HV, ever increasing higher HV? If the primary is a reasonably fat litz coil, pancake or around a
cylinder, with very few turns, and the secondary has 50:1 ratio of turns, this may be a solution. An auto auto-transformer has a 100:1 primary to
secondary windings ratio; cut this in half to reduce the step up of voltage, Also a smaller primary can reduce induce voltage from a typical auto auto-
transformer.
6. Are we designing such a situation as this quote:
“The basic technique used is to collide a similar electrical flow (positive or negative) so that neither can reverse itself and then surround the occurring
spark gap with concentric collectors noting that the Y-magnetic and Z-field will be collected but only the Z-field will be used as the X-electric and Y-
magnetic are transposed onto the new wire carrying the Z-field. Sounds confusing but if you just look at a 3D graph and picture the X-, Y- and Z-fields
you can easily see how you can flip one to the other. And that is simply what is happening in many of these devices.”
I believe it may work using a diode or an electret perhaps – electret has some potential danger (HV) but what are potential benefits?
The Tesla Switch uses a capacitor and a diode, but also reverses the current by pushing it from high voltage to low voltage, and switching on and off
rapidly is also inherent in this GGM1 design
7. Test proto-type system is easy, but how to design a safe and simple way to control speed to zero with a final design - Can we turn it off?
Is it a good idea to pull stator parts away from rotor – flip a switch to short the electrical circuit OFF?
8. Can we control speed? Voltage control on stator is more easy than rotor – how to do this on rotor?
Magnet positioning is likely more able to control speed.

Alternatively – a commutator would allow total control of both the stator and rotor electrical circuits – and add complexity – but it may be worth it if it will
allow tapping BEMF for charging or inductive drive.
9. Can we design for HF speed and not fling off the magnets with great speed, nor tear it apart with vibrations.
Contain in a cylinder – had wood, granite, limestone, or perhaps a special mix of cement.
10. I expect a simple toroid can be used to control speed; however it may be required to create a stator with sufficient inner diameter so that distance
is too great to run with out it, or it may not easily be stopped. (Electrical switch for stator coils may reduce power by half – may wish to use a long rubber
arm to switch this without danger.
GGM1 & GGM2 Potential
IS GGM1 A IS GGM2 A
1) TORSION MACHINE, 4) TORSION MACHINE,
2) POWER GENERATOR, AND/OR 5) POWER GENERATOR, AND/OR
3) INDUCYIVE LOAD drive? 6) INDUCYIVE LOAD drive
1) It is obviously a potential high torsion device,

2) it may behave as a generator,
3) And I suspect it is possible to use as a HF VHV switch - an inductive load driver.
I can see potential here to build a simple circuit with a capacitor to act as a battery, a neon lamp to serve as a resistive load for current to flow, and a switch
to make and break the source power to the primary coil leads; BUT GGM! Need NO BATTERY - and so I also believe we can design inductive auto-coils to
provide the switching twice per revolution automatically, resistance flow and inductive capacitive charge to replace a true capacitor – and provide the torsion
for spin and switching. A junk yard distributor may be a very simple solution – and a very logical solution for GG to try five decades ago.
7
GGM2.A.2a.Doc --- July, 06, 2009
This may require additional auto-coils made for this specific purpose – call it a power coil for now. Such an additional Power Coil on the stator can easily be
made to Tap in order to drive an inductive load – I believe, and the same design (perhaps) can be used as a dummy load/power source for the stator coil
circuit (I believe). It may also be necessary to drive this Power Coil, as a step-down transformer – putting power into the secondary and stepping down the
voltage to power the primaries (SPC1 & SPC2) & (RPC1 & RPC2).
This may eliminate a very special feature of this GGM1 design however (see above). An ever increasing HV coil input:
More intriguing to me – it the similarity to this fast switching, recursively reversing Tesla Switch.
RWS: I suspect that we can find a proper auto-coil design to directly connect the two pairs of auto-coils, Recursively Wired Scheme – Stator Coil #1
primary (SPC1) is powered by Stator Secondary Coil #2 (SSC2), and recursively SPC2 is powered by SSC1.
This seems a bit counter-intuitive – exactly as the Tesla Switch does.

If this works – can we still tap the circuit to drive an Inductive Load?
1. Does the high voltage to low voltage force the direction of flow of the current, as in the ‘active’ Tesla Switch Battery pairs, in and of itself;
2. Or as in the Tesla switch; do we require a high voltage diode to prevent back wash?
3. And if so, can we use an electret to function as a diode, capacitor, and resisted load.
4. Even if not required, does an electret offer more advantages than the increased complexity and possible danger that the electret offers?
I assume we can make a moderate voltage electret – and gain the advantages of it without the VHV dangers, because we already have a HV step-up
transformer recursively amplifying voltage, and reducing amps.
Assumptions Identified
1. No caps, no diodes
2. Inductive Load driver
3. RWD will not block BEMF
4. RWS will not blow up or fry the coils – because the amps drops to very low
5.
Questions, design requirements

1. Axel, bearings – shape, material, strength specs, length,
We need to design for speed:
2. Stator shell construction with fiberglass and two part epoxy –

This needs to be sturdy, absorb shock, manage a fatal disintegration of a running system, and it can be constructed as a polarized, Omni-
directional Electret, perhaps.
How wide?
How long?
Shape – cylinder?
Anchor?
W Formica dust, quartz?
Lime stone for its capacitive properties?
W layers as capacitor with plastic layers or copper screen
3. Coil design – SPC RPC
Type – pancake or stack pancake, or standard
Length
Gauge
4. Coil design – SSC RSC
Type
Length
Gauge
5. Fire timing adjustment – how
Iron rod or bar toroid to extend snap OFF point
8
GGM2.A.2a.Doc --- July, 06, 2009
6. How many coils SC RC

Simple is two (or one)?
Type
Shape
I Have No Wish to Copy Bedini

*** Caution to avoid this –
Not to reinvent the wheal, but think out-of-box.
Pull coils away from rotor as it is steel and
Also the further the coils are from rotor, the better
– GGM1 suggestion.
7. Size, shape, How many PM – SPM RPM

Simple is two (or one) – easier to add than coils
8. Do we need a closed circuit of primaries? SPC RPC
Will this output power? RSC1 -> RPC2 & RSC2 -> RPC1
I suspect it will – directly drive an inductive load if speed is fast enough – although it may be required to make more than two coils and PM for the
stator and rotor both.
Can we start with a neon lamp, and then switch to Main Load?
9. Do we need a closed circuit of secondaries? SSC RSC
Recursive wiring? SSC1 -> SPC2 & SSC2 -> SPC1
Can we tap/switch to Main Load?
10. Flywheel size, type
Both EM magnets at center – both PM are N facing center.

Needs to be positioned as George says – label N-S-E-W in drawing – every detail may be important.
George says air core, round is best – I believe (will check.

This also allows for the proper definition of an auto-coil – see my post immediately after yours with your original drawing, George sent me to that
page when I asked for power source. Note primary and secondary are sharing same core.
Black with many is secondary – red is primary – fat with few windings
I wish to power primary using secondary of the other – see note below. This may be possible, but it is the most simple,
I agree we may need to use three, but it is not most simple so I made two of each.
The center horizontal lines is the rotor shaft
Upper and lower most lines are the stator shell
Search for a speed control idea – I have two with three variants.
Add fly wheal
Read every detail from George – think outside of the box – remember you have seen and heard did not work – we need to find the other idea
Add wiring diagram into photo as you have always done – show end view also
Enhance questions page

below – add answers also – take your time – think – it is simple
Modularized R&D Tests Required
The first goad is to read GGM1 and identify all assumptions which may be required to actualize the concept. If it is not specified in
GGM1, then it is not needed – this is the default assumption. I now assume, we need to envision some simple tests of concept. – I
am now heading to GGM2 however- only because I must, and in doing so, I will likely add complexity...
9
GGM2.A.2C.Doc --- July, 19, 2009
1. Coils: can we improvise off the shelf automobile coils
I really wish to find a commonly used automobile coil which we can easily find used or buy, and dis-assemble this coil to use as the primary and
secondary coil. Research tells me that these are usually filled with oil, and has a ferrite core – both of these might need to be removed. The primary
will likely need to be separated from secondary – but it is possible that the primary can be extended. As the Block Diagram shows – the primary &
secondary are positioned at right angles to each other.
a. What coil
b. How to modify
c. How to mount
d. is this a benefit
e. If custom – what is a desirable goal?
2. Coils : must we custom create our coils

a. What coil
b. How to modify
c. How to mount –
d. is this a benefit
e. If custom – what is a desirable goal?
f. Layered Spiral Pancake Coil Construction
– Or is physical displacement required for timing
– given by the inductive charging interval
Prime Numbers Wiring Test: 1, 2, 3, 5, (7) = 18 (29) levels total

– 5 groups in series, each group is wired parallel; one is furthest from opposing electro-magnet
1. one spiral -litz – primary also

2. two spirals
3. three spirals
4. five spirals
5. seven spirals
6. eleven spirals (optional)
These need to be able to accept VHV and so may require sealing in a two part epoxy to prevent arcing, and to contain as a unit. Assume that this coil
needs to be securely affixed to the rotor so that it can not be flung out of the setting; I envision a fiberglass containment. Also, for high speed rotation
with no disruptive vibration, a heavy flywheel is envisioned made from lime stone, or granite – although hard wood is envisioned for proto-type testing
and design refinement. Both the primary and secondary coils are encased into one flywheel, and the permanent magnets are encased in an additional
wooden disk, with an adjustment allowing timing control with slight rotational advancement of perfect alignment.
3. RSW: What must our coils have in circuit to work?

See Winding configurations below
10
GGM2.A.2C.Doc --- July, 19, 2009
Will it allow the ever increasing HV input into step-up transformer without catastrophic failure?
Can it work to catch BEMF in simple mode?
Does it require a diode – will this allow BEMF capture
Can electret serve as a diode capacitor?
Series Parrell With step-down transformer
RSW: Wired in Series

Coil set one is wired into coil set two, plus to minus without exception. . Thus, the auto-transformer coils, with RWS are
interconnected - completing the circuit.
RSW: Wired in Parallel

Coil set one is wired into coil set two, Ground are connected - minus to minus. Thus, the auto-transformer coils, with
RWS are interconnected - completing the circuit.
RSW: Wiring w Step-down transformer Option
Completing set one is wired into coil set three, a step down transformer connecting to the output of both coils in the set,
and the lowered voltage connects to both of the primary coils - completing the circuit.
4. Spark Gap/ Oscillator: neon & xenon short arc lamp discharge when viewed through a scope; is it a sharp, square pulse?
This is a default fall back solution to replace a spark gap with a contained spark gap.
a. Low limit before voltage flows – stated to be 1K -10K
b. Induce HV plasma to allow LV current to pass
11
GGM2.A.2C.Doc --- July, 19, 2009
Can a ten winding coil wrapped around a xenon lamp allow a low voltage transfer through the xenon lamp leads (100 volts/12 volts) and if so can I
reduce the primary voltage enough to snap the secondary because I bleed of the circuit through the lamp? (See link #4 above first for this) If yes,
I can use a POT to vary oscillation speed with voltage - I suspect yes. If so this is a variable speed HV switch. About milli-second delays.
I have been working on a creating a series of sharp switching devices with parts we easily can get for repairs, and backup systems available as a
fallback solution, as short term testing may fail to identify weaknesses, resulting in failure sooner than we wish - when parts become hard or
impossible to get. I also expect solar EMP destruction of all semi-conductor electronics - this is the prime motivation. My systems must survive
this possibility not because it is likely, but rather because that is not an acceptable option.
: How can we make a VHF pulse

I have planed a phased series of devices, each successively more simple/crude (or available) with less fragile components - less to break, but
each 'next best solution' comes with other draw backs.
Strategy: refine the open spark gap - then replace it Make it capable of symmetrical and asymmetrically pulsed square waves with enough
variability to be good for water splitting, a Tesla switch (200-500 Hz), and a HV electro magnet, or PM G Gray type motor [which I now see is self
switched and is itself the switch - I think]
1. Use an auto coil and capture the 100 V inductive compressions for a trigger (see below)
2. Use a xenon short arc flash lamp: Wind a few turns of the primary to induce enough for the xenon to conduct, which is stated to be
1Kv. The idea is to operate the xenon lamp at its' minimal operating parameters to minimize wear & tear on this vital component.
This lamp snaps a flash at 10Kv also if you choose to drive it on the secondary. Xenon begins to break down at 50Kv. (See below)
Using a trigger voltage of 1Kv with several windings of the primary around the xenon lamp, it is stated that it will conduct when near high voltage --
Use the lamp leads to control the primary leads of a second auto coil (call it a Power Coil, and the first is the Trigger Coil).
Or tap the primary Trigger Coil leads, inserting a diode, then a cap bridges the primary lead to the flash lamp lead (as well as inductively coiled)
and you might get two or more secondaries snapping at the same time.
I suspect the discharge will also fluctuate the Trigger coil,

perhaps bringing the primary standing voltage down enough
that the secondary also snaps - but this is theory as await my
lamps to arrive. In either case, if is does not do this I am
planning to test a step down of the Trigger secondary to
trigger the Power coil primary.
"The ratio of secondary to primary turns in an ignition coil is

somewhere around 100:1. The ignition coil is operated directly
off a 12 volt source. However, the ignition coil does not work
like an ordinary transformer. in ordinary transformer will
produce output current at the same time that input current is
applied. An ignition coil actually does most of its work as an
inductor. When the ignition coil is connected to the battery, the
inductor is 'charged' with current. It takes a few milliseconds
for the current to build up the magnetic field - this on account
of reverse voltage caused by the increase in magnetic field.
During this short charging period, maybe a thousand volts are
produced at the high voltage terminal, not enough to actually
cause a spark." (Full text below pasted in)
As a backup system I am also designing a long life, stable,

hard wood cylinder with inlaid conductors driven by a variable
dc motor - a very physical switching like a commutator. A third
backup system is to find a distributor system from a junk yard
including the drive gear so I can connect a direct drive to a
rotor with a 1:1 axis spin ratio easily and accurately and easy
to fix it up when it breaks. I am working to make switching for
a Tesla Switch, hydrogen splitting, and two different designs of rotor/stator devices also. I hope to find a common solution
12
GGM2.A.2C.Doc --- July, 19, 2009
5. Electret:
a. Using a 2x2 inch, how many in series are required to achieve a VHF VHV oscillation?
b. Will it behave as a HV diode?
c. Will this remain?
d. Will it behave as a capacitor
e. What is acceptable smallest physical size – very low amps for safety
f. How many volts to create this?
g. How much heat
h. What plastic
i. Constant or variable size plates
13
GGM2.A.2C.Doc --- July, 19, 2009
Definition of GGM1
RPM: The stator permanent magnets at the west end of the motor, And although the back EMF voltage is reversed it does not matter
SPM: the rotor permanent magnets at the east end of the motor. because both are reversed ---the secondary windings on the rotor
* These positions could be reversed; it doesn't matter. and (RSC) the secondary windings in the stator, (SSC) which are
always opposed. One is upside down.
RPC: The primary coils on the rotor, (RPC1 & RPC2) which are at
the west end of the motor are excited and collapsed by Speaking in the singular:
the magnets in the stator, which are at the west end of the motor.
(SPM1 & SPM2) RPM: There is a permanent N52 magnet on the rotor which
excites and collapses the primary of the stator, SPC
SPC: The primary coils of the stator, (SPC1 & SPC2) which are at
the east end of the motor are excited and collapsed by the SPM: and there is a permanent N52 magnet in the stator, which
magnets on the rotor, which are at the east end of the motor. excites and collapses the primary on the rotor. RPC
(RPM1 & SPM2)
These are placed so as to be perfectly aligned for perfect timing
SSC1 & SSC2 and RSC1 & RSC2: allowing both the stator secondary (main field coil) and the rotor
The secondary coils of both the rotor and stator are in the middle secondary (main field coil) (RSC)
of the motor so they can oppose each other as main field coils; To be at peak voltage at the best timing mark, Similar to TDC on
They are the high voltage low current secondary windings of cars
transformers.
The machine must be rotated by hand or starter motor and once
When excited by mutual induction from their primary windings going it naturally increases speed---the faster it goes the faster it
(SPC RPC) they oppose each other, and when they collapse there goes and the faster it goes and so forth etc.,
is a large spike of reversed polarity of free energy present from the And the aether just naturally gets involved in the repetitive
aether on both of them at the same instant, which means they are symmetry that has been established, and flows trying to keep the
still opposing each other, but with more intensity. status quo.
The free energy comes from the aether every time the fields
A flywheel of suitable mass extracts even more free energy from collapse---batteries are not needed to run the motor at all, but
the aether as proven in the moon shots that went higher and faster could be used to initially turn the rotor to start the motor.
than all their calculations.
There is unlimited energy that can be taken from the aether, and I
MFC == SMFC RMFC  SSC RSC don't care who makes the motor just so long as it gets done.
The main field coils are the secondaries of transformers or auto
transformers. The ignition coil in a car is similar. It is really quite simple, But of course most people are always
looking for something more complicated;
SPC RPC The primary windings are excited and collapsed by
fixed permanent magnets— SPM RPM -- they are neodymium The answer to free energy is simple
N52 in the stator and on the rotor. And it has been known and suppressed for a long time, and the
answer to curing cancer is simple and it has been known and
The collapsing fields of the primaries — SPM RPM - give a very suppressed for 100 years.
high voltage in the secondaries and — SSM RSM -- an even
bigger repulsion occurs when the secondaries collapse, producing Don't look for very complicated solutions to free energy-
a higher voltage back EMF, --the answer is very simple and you now have the answer.
14
GGM2.A.2C.Doc --- July, 19, 2009
Vince – Notes – comments & observations

The George Gray Motor (Original Gray Motor) concept is possibly more than just a motor with rotational torque; it may be the best way to build a small
variable speed oscillator for switching short snappy square waves of HV and milliamps. Below is a rough version of my ideas in progress - it is a letter I am
building for someone - but I am waiting for parts to continue testing, so I throw it out in this rough and incomplete form for comments and to share
knowledge I have gained from G Gray and others.
Questions I need answers to still:
1. In an automobile ignition coil - is the 'top' or 'bottom' of the coil more likely to house the primary or secondary windings? This varies how I would test
physical alignment: I picture the alignment of two/three automobile auto-coils on rotor and parallel to it; and the companion coils of the stator also parallel to
the rotor axle. Next: is it best to place the magnets and coils (of stator for example) in a straight line? If this was done all coils of rotor and stator would fire at
once - I think. Also, this will bring the coils and the PM as close as possible for the greatest distance. It also means the rotor needs a diameter equal to 2 X
coil diameter plus the axle diameter, plus clearance == about 6 inches or so perhaps. Roughly another six inches to house the coils in the stator and you
have a 12 inch diameter motor roughly - [I wish I still had Maya to model this]
This also allows fine tuning to test very small asymmetrical ratios as found in quarts crystal - to experiment with fine tuning after it works. Design the coil and
magnet device that attaches it to the rotor to be both precise and variable. Same would be nice in the stator.
"The secondary coils of both the rotor and stator are in the middle of the motor so they can oppose each other as main field coils; they are the high voltage
low current secondary windings of transformers. When they are excited by mutual induction from their primary windings they oppose each other, and when
they collapse there is a large spike of reversed polarity of free energy present from the aether on both of them at the same instant, which means they are still
opposing each other, but with more intensity. "
I suspect that the coils each have their 'tops facing the center and parallel to the rotor axis. I find cutaway diagrams of automobile ignition coils showing the
primary at the bottom of the coil. Two of the links below seem to show heavier windings at the bottom of the coil. The reverse is equally possible - I can not
see enough in cutaway images yet. Does any one know?
Next question in this area: how many coils - I like to try prime numbers - 2, 3, 5; these are my initial hunches.
1. http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/magnetic/ignition.html
2. http://www.aa1car.com/library/ignition_coils.htm
3. http://www.diynetwork.com/diy/ab_parts_accessories/article/0,,diy_13690_2271392,00.html
4. http://www.sentex.net/~mwandel/cannon/sparky.html
2. I suspect rotational distortion might be most apparent and beneficial if the rotor is vertical, but a horizontal axle is likely easier to control with simple
bearings. Anyone with vertical axle experience or thoughts? If horizontal- does a north-south or east-west orientation alter performance once the rotor is
spinning fast? For torsion-field physics effects?
I see more here than I so far can appreciate.
The primary has a 100 v compression spike - and this can be used as a When battery was too weak to show on video,
trigger. he removed some to show just two in series ????
The points have a small cap to stop point arcing
Secondary has a 10Kv output milliamp fast pulse 100% mechanical backup system:
- So a 24 v battery supply will double that = 20K. If we know the gear ratio of the teeth in the gear
at drive end or distributor shaft, and put a drive gear on rotor
This secondary is acceptable to xenon perhaps? with same number of teeth, it will give a controllable pulse with
- Use a cap like the one to protect points - to protect light switch? an advance adjustable system for easy cost
- 1:1 ratio with direct drive of distributor system.
And primary can be pulsed with a neon lamp & cap perhaps? Or xenon
short arc BUT - do we need it ???
Bedini (in a video) uses 6 neon lamps in a series as a back emf
tester !!!!!! I will think - I also want your ideas when you have time.
15
GGM2.A.2C.Doc --- July, 19, 2009
I see this as a very high frequency switch – switching via very high speed rotation – and so the relaxation time of the coils must be made to allow very high
speed relaxation times. There are a few comments I incorporate into this GMM1 design due to comments I received when asking specific questions: 1)
power is to come from an auto-coil, 2) avoid straight line or sharp corners, 3) avoid iron with coils, 4) there is a speed adjustment feature possible.
I assume we wish to aim for about 6 KHz and 10KVdc. – Because a physicist said so – this is what the motionless devices seem to resonate at. With a
moving device it is likely that the Tesla Switch using mechanical switching is a better guide. The Tesla Switch operated at 300 to 600 hertz and then
became dangerous – why dangerous? It did not harm batteries, but perhaps produced too much power for the devices running on the inductive load.
Simplicity is the Key; I seek the simplest solution. If there are two options I wish to find the one that is most simple – all other things held constant.
Above on page 1, is my interpretation of the only block diagram that satisfies all aspects of GGM1 – but GGM1 is not extensively documented, and variables
therefore exist within. Below is my list of the variables which I have so far identified.
Letter to Marc P – Marc P response
Marc:
I am like you, I bought many parts - but I have no solution - and I have no knowledge of Time available - so priorities are hard decisions.
Discussing Sereda: I believe David made a new Tesla coil – he does not say exactly how - but I believe he made three, and uses them as radio broadcast towers, and plays the song of
the sun into each. I believe he made these three Tesla coils to be like the pyramid at Giza; using a stone - says lime stone has amazing capacitive power to collect power, and I believe
that he put a coil (of some sort) at the top of a pyramid in place of the pyramid cap stone. He gives many clues - and I listened many (25) times to the talk, and each time I hear more
'little things'.
In making this very new type of Tesla Coil, he initially created an OU device with COP > 3. Then he realized potential and made a better design - perhaps granite rock, pyramid shape,
coil top, and three as a team to get massively OU COP.
Differentials are always very small, distance, power, frequency. He discovered electron and positron, quark and anti-quark (all matter and the anti particle are never exactly equal - tiny
differential.
The secret - I believe - is to follow the length of the sides of the Pyramid, because they reflect the natural - sacred geometry of the Earth - he says as Tesla did. This is the same as
the difference of the circumference of the Earth at equator versus the circumference pole to pole - and then adjusted a little.
The ratio of the Earth is .9986, and the pyramid is .9984 - because - he believes - it is adjusted to a specific location on the Earth. This is a very small amount - so I believe it can not be
perfect in initial design, but must be designed so it can be adjusted after it is built.
He specifically says that one should make a PM motor placing the PM around the motor - Not perfectly symmetrical, but with very small differences. If using 4 magnets, I would use the
4 sides of the pyramid; if using 6 magnets, I would use the six lengths of the quartz crystal. So I am looking for a method to fine tune - adjust - magnet position after it is running, and
stop adjusting when speed get the most fast.
GGM1 - project was going very well until yesterday:
Yesterday George got a message email - a death threat - a scam to collect money, but it was spooky to all.
The drawings are done, George is writing a description of how to make - and now he is worried that a big company will steal it and prevent all from using it. He is thinking of canceling
project !!! Ahhhhgerrr !!!
I got pushed out of the project mostly, and I have not seen the drawings at all - makes me sad for this reason. I am working very hard to get George help in Australia - John Carter and
Panacea University. Not sure how it will finish, or when. So now I am not sure what to build.
I still like my ideas as I put in GGM1 document, but it may require a diode - using an electret, and two auto coils powering each other, recursively. But this is less simple, and I am
unsure what such an invention will do - but George Motor is a torsion machine motor - My idea is also like a Tesla Switch, and it may be a very special idea.
Vince
Hello brother,
Thanks for all these mails, this is always enjoy to read you !!!
16
GGM2.A.2C.Doc --- July, 19, 2009
George gives us a lot, I think we can duplicate it later with more time to make research, for my part I have sufficiently studied and I think make first a basic phi transformer ( I order for
resin and iron powder today) and try to power it with a common 1000 turns/min motor, second part I will add a heavy flywheel, and fix magnets around as Bedini monopole rotor with
natural differentials.....
after I want to make a heavy litz coil transformer with same mass both primary/secondary and use it in front of the monopole/flywheel , pulse the coil in front of magnets and collect
radiant energy on a capacitor...... I will pulse this coil with a xenon tube or a simple rotative spark gap mounted on the large flywheel ( I have calculated with a flywheel of 23" I can
achieve 500ns or less in pulse with tungsten rods of 0,2mm).
input is from a HV transformer with 3 stage voltage multiplier with an autotransformer at the beginning to vary the input voltage of the transformer to move 0 to 30KV to adjust speed of
motor, or I can put electrets.... but I can't vary voltage...
after I will built a 2 discs rotor with monopoles magnets on with little differentials ( one disc with NNNN and second disc just SSSS) and put heavy coils (with tiny wire AWG 34 because
radiant energy is amplified by impedance and move large watts easily on tiny wires)between the discs and discharge the capacitor by discharging the negative side of the cap (because
by this way there is no back emf !!! so you don't need to collect it ! and because there is also scalar amplification by this way) please read for this the book : free energy generation by
Bedini/Bearden this is a must, the better work of twenty years.
all coils are flat spiral multi-filar greatly insulated with air core and neodymium magnets. just the secondary of the transformer is litz coil (not connected multi-filar)
that's all, the only component to tune is the capacitor : if you add capacity the voltage is step down.... I will to pulse the motor with 7KV or around and I will discharge the capacitor with
rotative spark gap on the flywheel....
like that I have multistage amplification : my flywheel, the monopole rotor which greatly help to charge the cap ( I think you have not understood what is exactly the sense of this
monopole rotor...) and the radiant pulse in motor coils achieve amplification too.
understand that : I will connect/ disconnect negative wire/side of the radiant energy charged cap, the positive is every time still connected. so, by this way there is no problem of back
emf !!!
thanks for Sereda information! very great thinking of lime stone, thanks !
see you
M
Electrets – Questions
New Battery-Cap: Is it possible that we can design a simple 'variable' flow? Will it induce BEMF?
electret which is 'conditioned' with use - no need to 'cook' in oven to
soften plastic while applying HV - rather, like a Bedini battery it gets 1) A variable resistor might serve as a speed control - since a dead-short
conditioned; while GGM1 is running - Build it like an old Edison Battery - will stop it.
make a 2 inch square, long rectangular 'battery-cap' water tight housing 2) The diode like quality can directionally blast a charge into a coil.
with slots into which we can slide a variable series of conductors then 3) A very high resistance may tickle a 'Fogal transistor device' like micro-
insulator, etc. - such as EM-dance with interesting and usable results.
4) Can it produce: VHF & VHV - very low current - Hummm?
aluminum -plastic-tin-plastic-copper-plastic-aluminum (as one possible
example to test)
Or Electret requires a switch to discharge, and time to recharge.
aluminum -plastic- aluminum -plastic- aluminum -plastic- aluminum -
plastic- aluminum Can we put an Electret in a vessel of water to split gas from water?
- (or salt water)
And use mineral oil or transformer oil bath. - Will it charge up and auto discharge when it reaches a specific voltage?
- & make gas?
1) Will use of the GGM1 condition this new Battery-Cap to be perfect for
the job with use of the specific GGM1 coil design etc.? OK - put several into a series to vary voltage,
2) Will use of GGM1 'create' (manufacture) electrets without the need to Can we tune to a discharge frequency?
cook in oven with HV applied?
3) Will use of GGM1 create a diode effect in this electret? What if we make a capacitor - put it in mineral oil, now put a spiral litz coil
4) Will this idea work if we DO cook in oven conventionally, and then use under it but insulated with oil,
in GGM1? - and connect the coil leads to two thin copper tubes bent and placed as
a double helix rising above mineral oil as electrodes
If GGM1 'requires' a 'diode' - can we use an electret in the recursive (Self powered Tesla-coil - revolting?)
wiring circuit in series, just before the input to the primaries - to serve as - Then do we make an Electret as an oscillator pulsing sharp HV -
a capacitor and as a diode? Will it last? Will it amplify? Will it stop back potential?
17
GGM2.A.2C.Doc --- July, 19, 2009
Electret Answers - Marc P

Yes, you can split water to gas with electrets IN MANY WAYS, you can
think more with the use of electrets here: I have not still read GGM1.doc but hope do that this new week.
- first :splitting water is in a lot of stuff
o (Meyers and others) HV pulses, about manufacture electrets in new ways you've got already any answers
o often HF or VHF, but, electrets effect already occur in Joe cell (you can see that specially
o Sometimes peoples use music songs or like.... when charged with VHV, when input disconnected you can spark the
plates one, two, three times... but in fact this effect already appear in
But in fact it's every time the same process electrolytic caps powerfully, but to use the benefice you need FAST
- HV pulse generates higher frequencies in the pulse and resonance SWITCH, this is the key, like the divine spark, all is in the quality of the
effect with aether, matter, medium...water...AND music vibrates spark ! and it's quite difficult to make fast powerful VHV switch !!!!)
matter, aether... in the same way.
it's amazing but I have already discharged electrolytic caps 6 times or
When peoples use DC current from battery or power line it's not real DC more after input disconnected -.the best way is to discharge 10% or less
current.... : power line (or grid) is like an antenna which catch radiant of the capacity in the pulse's discharge, 90% is free here !
VHF radiations.... and battery delivers pockets of electrons in a non
linear current form... Electret effect occur in conditioned battery too,
Like nanotubes in water catch ormus/radiant energy (for me it’s the same
In fact you catch free energy from a shock, this is the divine spark (in our things !)
heart) which make the world moving,
THERE IS MANY WAYS TO MAKE ELECTRETS and better than just an
ALL appears with THE (divine) SPARK, the hearth beat, so from this electret.
shock in matter you catch the mechanical (heat) vibration of atoms
(which is 300m/s !) because you stop it a brief moment... you catch too Yes, Tesla coil can be self powered because it's at the origin a free
the heat energy of matter, AND from the momentarily polarized medium energy generator ! The output of the secondary can be connected to an
and catch aether/radiant energy resonant (same mass of wires for both coils) transformer, just find the
good load (big impedance as thin wire of big mass of coil, or high
So yes, electrets can do a lot of things like an exited oscillator, impedance Joe cell)
Electrets in series are VHV oscillators if exited.... many ways to excite
them ! Connect the oscillator to a pulsed Joe cell as example http://www.livegreenordie.com/index.php?action=blogs&id=72608&site=
And you have the both pulsed and oscillator vibrations... ELECTROMAGNETIC+FUSION+TESLA+COIL+IN+WATER-
PLASMA+MESSIAH
Electrets VHV / low amp power is useable for any load which use very
low amp... so the bigger the impedance of a coil (or cell) the less amp 1 million volts in an exited electret is more easy to make than a same
you need as input. volts Tesla coil, no?
Tesla said : "give me a load and I will find the correct input", I like the first picture here; I see a decomposed nanotube in it
Here we've got the input, we must find the correct load and recovery http://www.subtleenergies.com/ormus/tw/patterns.htm
system, and if it's gas the question is answered,
18
GGM3.A.1A.Doc --- September 15, 2009
GMM1A.5a.doc comments - Marc P

Hello, thanks Vince for this idea of GGM docs, I don't understand about the " precise asymmetrical lineal
I have any answers to give here, you write: distances ", how can you make an asymmetry with a distance ?
GOALS :
I see this as a very high frequency switch – very high speed Make a device to enable off-the-grid power generation, make it
rotation – and so the relaxation time of the coils must be made to available to all, and make it with technology that can quickly
allow very high speed relaxation times. I don't clearly understand become ubiquitously disseminated throughout society. Sorry but
why speak about a switch, there is no contactor, brushes or switch not agree with this ! free energy is not for everybody yet, peoples
components... frequency depends the torque you want, better is too crazy, and I don't want to become terroris3ts for the
perhaps 1200 turns per minutes to achieve 60Hz for you, it's governments !! Please stop write that or I will live far away of this
already quite (enough!) high, no ? mailing list ! Work for you, later times will change, BUT LATER
I assume we wish to aim for about 6 KHz and 10KVdc. – because !!!!!!
a physicist said so – opinions? I see a possible simple toroid such as a simple soft iron rod or bar,
6 KHz is a very very (too) high torque !! Your balls bearing will slid into a slot on the stator for adjusting the reach of the PMs and
heat and burn! :O syncing the HV discharge of the secondaries which charge the
HV can be more for my opinion. primaries, and perhaps attracting the coils which should now be
running with reverse current powered by back EMF from the
immediate last excited moment; a design that can easily be used
Tesla Switch operated at 300 to 600 hertz and then became to extend the reach of the magnet to the coil and thus delay the
dangerous – why dangerous? SNAP OFF moment. Waow ! So complicated, primary, secondary
The devices are different !!! Dangerous because if you open too delay switch ? toroids........ why not add all this in a mikl shake and
much a star's gat2e you can be sucked by it ! and.... bye bye make a good cream with fruits !?
Vince ! Sincerely, one thing by time, first toroids are not good as
No, sincerely the devices are different you can't easily open star's "first primary"... need time to answer for that.... later, second no
gat2e with this motor ! 600Hz is already too high for a rotor in ferrite core in the "first primary" if the HV transformer have a ferrite
common conditions... (or like) core. if not cancelation can occurs because out of phases.
no time to continue, good night !
This may require additional auto-coils made for this specific GGM1.5.marc corrections1.doc
purpose – call it a power coil for now
"power coil" is misunderstand for me, I prefer HV transformer for Hello everybody,
this, because for me power coil is more appropriate for the HV I have took the time to read your ideas on George motor and I a
secondaries coils, if you are agree we can use HV transformer for few ideas,
one, and HV terminal coils or power coils for the others...
For the primary energised by magnet we can give the name : "first First time this is very interesting this motor is energised just with
primary" or something like that ,no? magnets, scientists speak about a PM rotor is like a "rotating
discharge capacitor effect in the coil" = the PM rotor has a
Can we use an electret to discharge of capacitor effect on a coil.... very interesting, yes,
function as a diode, capacitor, and resisted load. Even if not because here no need of capacitor, switchs, brushes....
required, does an electret offer more advantages than the
increased complexity and possible danger that the electret offers? BUT here we need to make HV transformers to energize the
I assume we can make a moderate voltage electret – and gain the secondary HV coils....
advantages of it without the VHV dangers, because we already AND to tune our coils to find the correct voltages.
have a HV step-up transformer recursively amplifying voltage, and
reducing amps. Waow, electrets as a diode okay, think more about So, first consideration: I think the secondary coils MUST be air
that regarding gray tube.... but tesla switch + electret diode + core because air core coils can resonate freely at the high
diodes = BUG for me, too complicated, we speak about GGM or frequency of the HV transformer which has already a
special pulsed motor ??? ferromagnetic core.
These two would then be fitted with additional stator components If there are 2 ferromagnetic cores in both coils the
which can be swiveled and positioned to achieve precise cores CAN BE canceled because they aren’t in phase at the same
asymmetrical lineal distances – See David Sereda time !
19
Second time, the tuning of the voltages is I think critical.... Third thing, I think about tesla's flat spiral coils motor, (Vince I
For my part I am sure of some things : have sended a patent to you... but me I can't send it now because
- the more the voltage the better to catch free energy too bad internet connexion, sorry) used by tesla to use pulsed
- the less the amperage the less hot in coils.... the higher the discharge caps as well as AC output of tesla coil as input. vortex
impedance (R and Farads) the less amperage is consumed in effect is very good to make power, and you can make a these coils
input. in the multifilar way.... take SEVERAL wires as a heavy litz, make
a flat spiral with and connect them in series....
So, for my part if I will make this motor I will make an resonant
Very high voltage transformers (same mass both primary and Fourth thing, make a "divine" differential of weight between
secondary) powered by a quite high voltage from the energized stator/rotor HV secondaries regarding differentials of david
coil by the magnet, and will make a very short primary (around 15 Serad2a, make a differential with the length of wires is quite
turns) for the HV transformer like a tesla coil............. but around a difficult to make but it's could be great as Sereda does.... as well
ferromagnetic nanopowder core. as differential of awg of the wires...
I think the area of copper must be the same for both primary and welcome to the new George's motor crazy forum !
secondary of the HV transformer, just by using homemade litz
wires. thanks for your comments,
best regards,
Perhaps just 2 HV transformer can be used for 4 HV coils, one Marc
transformer for 2 coils no ? PS: please Vince, can you send that to every members of this
GGM group, I have still connexion failure !
Second thing, I think the better is to tune the primary (energized
from magnet) coil to find the correct voltage for a relatively fixed Marc: I am working to make George Motor a reality. When you
HV transformer and a totally fixed HV secondary coils. have time, I would love the ideas from France - It is a very rough
by fixed I want to say : you build it and don't touch it after. draft still, but the concept is there - and a very simple test platform
also. - Vince
20
http://www.sentex.net/~mwandel/cannon/sparky.html
Autotransformer - Operating principles
An ignition coil is essentially an autotransformer with a high ratio of

secondary to primary windings. By "Autotransformer", I mean that the
primary and secondary windings are not actually separated - they share a
few of the windings.
The ratio of secondary to primary turns in an ignition coil is somewhere

around 100:1. The ignition coil is operated directly off a 12 volt source.
However, the ignition coil does not work like an ordinary transformer. An
ordinary transformer will produce output current at the same time that input
current is applied. An ignition coil actually does most of its work acting as
an inductor. When the ignition coil is connected to the battery, the inductor
is 'charged' with current. It takes a few milliseconds for the current to build
up the magnetic field - this on account of reverse voltage caused by the
increase in magnetic field. During this short charging period, maybe a
thousand volts are produced at the high voltage terminal, not enough to
actually cause a spark.
The actual spark is generated when the breaker contacts open. For an
ideal inductor, the current and voltage relate by:
V = L dI
Where V is voltage, L is inductance (in henrys) and dI is the rate

of change of the current.
Thus, seeing that L is constant for the inductor, the abrupt change in
current will cause a very large voltage to be produced. This produces a
very short, very high voltage spike. Of course, the change in current is on
the primary side, but because the primary and secondary coils have a
large mutual inductance (this is where the transformer part comes in), you
get a spike on the order of 100 or more volts on the primary, and 10000
volts on the secondary. Even the primary side of the coil can give you a bit
of a jolt if you hold the wires wile disconnecting power. Also note that any
contacts you will use will get a lot of sparks, also on account of this.
A less theoretical way of looking at it is that disconnecting the current

source will cause the magnetic field in the coil to collapse (because nothing
is forcing it magnetic anymore), and the rapid change of magnetic field in
turn induces a large voltage in the windings.
In an engine with four or more cylinders, the high voltage terminal of the
coil is connected to the distributor, which is just a fancy high voltage
21
rotating switch, for selecting which of the spark plugs needs to be fired. This is much cheaper than having one ignition coil for each cylinder.
Modern cars of course all use electronic ignitions instead of the unreliable mechanical breaker points for interrupting the current to the ignition
coil. However, the ignition coil still works the same way, so you should be able to use an ignition coil even from a modern car. The main thing
that has changed is that the 'points' have been replaced with fancy computer gadgetry and power electronics.
One thing that cars usually have that I didn't include in the circuit is a small capacitor across the breaker points, often called the "ignitor". This
capacitor in cars before electronic ignition had a tendency to fail over time, so you may have heard people refer to it. The capacitor helps to
protect the points by liming voltage across the contacts, so the contacts themselves won't spark. It also forms a bit of a resonant circuit with
the coil, and that way enhances the spark, although it probably cuts down on the output voltage a little bit. For the purpose of firing a cannon, it
works well enough without one.
22
Winding configurations
Transformers are very versatile devices. The basic concept of energy transfer between mutual inductors is useful enough between a single primary and single secondary coil,
but transformers don't have to be made with just two sets of windings. Consider this transformer circuit: (Figure below)
Transformer with multiple secondaries, provides multiple output voltages.
Here, three inductor coils share a common magnetic core, magnetically “coupling” or “linking” them together. The relationship of winding turn ratios and voltage ratios seen
with a single pair of mutual inductors still holds true here for multiple pairs of coils. It is entirely possible to assemble a transformer such as the one above (one primary
winding, two secondary windings) in which one secondary winding is a step-down and the other is a step-up. In fact, this design of transformer was quite common in vacuum
tube power supply circuits, which were required to supply low voltage for the tubes' filaments (typically 6 or 12 volts) and high voltage for the tubes' plates (several hundred
volts) from a nominal primary voltage of 110 volts AC. Not only are voltages and currents of completely different magnitudes possible with such a transformer, but all circuits
are electrically isolated from one another.
Photograph of multiple-winding transformer with six windings, a primary and five secondaries.
The transformer in Figure above is intended to provide both high and low voltages necessary in an electronic system using vacuum tubes. Low voltage is required to power
the filaments of vacuum tubes, while high voltage is required to create the potential difference between the plate and cathode elements of each tube. One transformer with
multiple windings suffices elegantly to provide all the necessary voltage levels from a single 115 V source. The wires for this transformer (15 of them!) are not shown in the
photograph, being hidden from view.
If electrical isolation between secondary circuits is not of great importance, a similar effect can be obtained by “tapping” a single secondary winding at multiple points along its
length, like Figure below.
A single tapped secondary provides multiple voltages.

A tap is nothing more than a wire connection made at some point on a winding between the very ends. Not surprisingly, the winding turn/voltage magnitude relationship of a
normal transformer holds true for all tapped segments of windings. This fact can be exploited to produce a transformer capable of multiple ratios: (Figurebelow)
23
A tapped secondary using a switch to select one of many possible voltages.

Carrying the concept of winding taps further, we end up with a “variable transformer,” where a sliding contact is moved along the length of an exposed secondary winding,
able to connect with it at any point along its length. The effect is equivalent to having a winding tap at every turn of the winding, and a switch with poles at every tap position:
(Figure below)
A sliding contact on the secondary continuously varies the secondary voltage.
One consumer application of the variable transformer is in speed controls for model train sets, especially the train sets of the 1950's and 1960's. These transformers were
essentially step-down units, the highest voltage obtainable from the secondary winding being substantially less than the primary voltage of 110 to 120 volts AC. The variable-
sweep contact provided a simple means of voltage control with little wasted power, much more efficient than control using a variable resistor!
Moving-slide contacts are too impractical to be used in large industrial power transformer designs, but multi-pole switches and winding taps are common for voltage
adjustment. Adjustments need to be made periodically in power systems to accommodate changes in loads over months or years in time, and these switching circuits provide
a convenient means. Typically, such “tap switches” are not engineered to handle full-load current, but must be actuated only when the transformer has been de-energized (no
power).
Seeing as how we can tap any transformer winding to obtain the equivalent of several windings (albeit with loss of electrical isolation between them), it makes sense that it
should be possible to forego electrical isolation altogether and build a transformer from a single winding. Indeed this is possible, and the resulting device is called
an autotransformer: (Figure below)
This autotransformer steps voltage up with a single tapped winding, saving copper, sacrificing isolation.
The autotransformer depicted above performs a voltage step-up function. A step-down autotransformer would look something like Figure below.
24
This auto transformer steps voltage down with a single copper-saving tapped winding.
Autotransformers find popular use in applications requiring a slight boost or reduction in voltage to a load. The alternative with a normal (isolated) transformer would be to
either have just the right primary/secondary winding ratio made for the job or use a step-down configuration with the secondary winding connected in series-aiding (“boosting”)
or series-opposing (“bucking”) fashion. Primary, secondary, and load voltages are given to illustrate how this would work.
First, the “boosting” configuration. In Figure below the secondary coil's polarity is oriented so that its voltage directly adds to the primary voltage.
Ordinary transformer wired as an autotransformer to boost the line voltage.

Next, the “bucking” configuration. In Figure below the secondary coil's polarity is oriented so that its voltage directly subtracts from the primary voltage:
Ordinary transformer wired as an autotransformer to buck the line voltage down.
The prime advantage of an autotransformer is that the same boosting or bucking function is obtained with only a single winding, making it cheaper and lighter to manufacture
than a regular (isolating) transformer having both primary and secondary windings.
Like regular transformers, autotransformer windings can be tapped to provide variations in ratio. Additionally, they can be made continuously variable with a sliding contact to
tap the winding at any point along its length. The latter configuration is popular enough to have earned itself its own name: the Variac. (Figure below)
A variac is an autotransformer with a sliding tap.
25
Small variacs for benchtop use are popular pieces of equipment for the electronics experimenter, being able to step household AC voltage down (or sometimes up as well)
with a wide, fine range of control by a simple twist of a knob.
 REVIEW:
 Transformers can be equipped with more than just a single primary and single secondary winding pair. This allows for multiple step-up and/or step-down ratios
in the same device.
 Transformer windings can also be “tapped:” that is, intersected at many points to segment a single winding into sections.
 Variable transformers can be made by providing a movable arm that sweeps across the length of a winding, making contact with the winding at any point along
its length. The winding, of course, has to be bare (no insulation) in the area where the arm sweeps.
 An autotransformer is a single, tapped inductor coil used to step up or step down voltage like a transformer, except without providing electrical isolation.
 A Variac is a variable autotransformer.
Phasing
Since transformers are essentially AC devices, we need to be aware of the phase relationships between the primary and secondary circuits. Using our SPICE example from
before, we can plot the waveshapes (Figure below) for the primary and secondary circuits and see the phase relations for ourselves:
spice transient analysis file for use with nutmeg: rload 4 5 1k

.tran 0.5m 17m
transformer .end
v1 1 0 sin(0 15 60 0 0)
rbogus1 1 2 1e-12 nutmeg commands:
v2 5 0 dc 250 setplot tran1
l1 2 0 10000
l2 3 5 100
k l1 l2 0.999
plot v(2) v(3,5)
vi1 3 4 ac 0
Secondary voltage V(3,5) is in-phase with primary voltage V(2), and stepped down by factor of ten.
In going from primary, V(2), to secondary, V(3,5), the voltage was stepped down by a factor of ten, (Figure above) , and the current was stepped up by a factor of 10.
(Figure below) Both current (Figure below) and voltage (Figure above) waveforms are in-phase in going from primary to secondary.
nutmeg commands:
setplot tran1
plot I(L1#branch) I(L2#branch)
Primary and secondary currents are in-phase. Secondary current is stepped up by a factor of ten.
It would appear that both voltage and current for the two transformer windings are in-phase with each other, at least for our resistive load. This is simple enough, but it would
be nice to know which way we should connect a transformer in order to ensure the proper phase relationships be kept. After all, a transformer is nothing more than a set of
magnetically-linked inductors, and inductors don't usually come with polarity markings of any kind. If we were to look at an unmarked transformer, we would have no way of
knowing which way to hook it up to a circuit to get in-phase (or 180o out-of-phase) voltage and current: (Figure below)
26
As a practical matter, the polarity of a transformer can be ambiguous.

Since this is a practical concern, transformer manufacturers have come up with a sort of polarity marking standard to denote phase relationships. It is called the dot
convention, and is nothing more than a dot placed next to each corresponding leg of a transformer winding: (Figure below)
A pair of dots indicates like polarity.

Typically, the transformer will come with some kind of schematic diagram labeling the wire leads for primary and secondary windings. On the diagram will be a pair of dots
similar to what is seen above. Sometimes dots will be omitted, but when “H” and “X” labels are used to label transformer winding wires, the subscript numbers are supposed
to represent winding polarity. The “1” wires (H 1 and X1) represent where the polarity-marking dots would normally be placed.
The similar placement of these dots next to the top ends of the primary and secondary windings tells us that whatever instantaneous voltage polarity seen across the primary
winding will be the same as that across the secondary winding. In other words, the phase shift from primary to secondary will be zero degrees.
On the other hand, if the dots on each winding of the transformer do not match up, the phase shift will be 180obetween primary and secondary, like this: (Figure below)
Out of phase: primary red to dot, secondary black to dot.

Of course, the dot convention only tells you which end of each winding is which, relative to the other winding(s). If you want to reverse the phase relationship yourself, all you
have to do is swap the winding connections like this: (Figure below)
In phase: primary red to dot, secondary red to dot.

 REVIEW:
27
 The phase relationships for voltage and current between primary and secondary circuits of a transformer are direct: ideally, zero phase shift.
 The dot convention is a type of polarity marking for transformer windings showing which end of the winding is which, relative to the other windings.
Voltage regulation
As we saw in a few SPICE analyses earlier in this chapter, the output voltage of a transformer varies some with varying load resistances, even with a constant voltage input.
The degree of variance is affected by the primary and secondary winding inductances, among other factors, not the least of which includes winding resistance and the degree
of mutual inductance (magnetic coupling) between the primary and secondary windings. For power transformer applications, where the transformer is seen by the load
(ideally) as a constant source of voltage, it is good to have the secondary voltage vary as little as possible for wide variances in load current.
The measure of how well a power transformer maintains constant secondary voltage over a range of load currents is called the transformer's voltage regulation. It can be
calculated from the following formula:
“Full-load” means the point at which the transformer is operating at maximum permissible secondary current. This operating point will be determined primarily by the winding
wire size (ampacity) and the method of transformer cooling. Taking our first SPICE transformer simulation as an example, let's compare the output voltage with a 1 kΩ load
versus a 200 Ω load (assuming that the 200 Ω load will be our “full load” condition). Recall if you will that our constant primary voltage was 10.00 volts AC:
freq v(3,5) I(vi1) freq v(3,5) I(vi1)

6.000E+01 9.962E+00 9.962E-03 Output with 1k ohm load 6.000E+01 9.348E+00 4.674E-02 Output with 200 ohm load
Notice how the output voltage decreases as the load gets heavier (more current). Now let's take that same transformer circuit and place a load resistance of extremely high
magnitude across the secondary winding to simulate a “no-load” condition: (See "transformer" spice list")
transformer .ac lin 1 60 60

v1 1 0 ac 10 sin .print ac v(2,0) I(v1)
rbogus1 1 2 1e-12 .print ac v(3,5) I(vi1)
rbogus2 5 0 9e12 .end
l1 2 0 100 freq v(2) I(v1)
l2 3 5 100 6.000E+01 1.000E+01 2.653E-04
k l1 l2 0.999
vi1 3 4 ac 0 freq v(3,5) I(vi1)
rload 4 5 9e12 6.000E+01 9.990E+00 1.110E-12 Output with (almost) no load
So, we see that our output (secondary) voltage spans a range of 9.990 volts at (virtually) no load and 9.348 volts at the point we decided to call “full load.” Calculating voltage
regulation with these figures, we get:
Incidentally, this would be considered rather poor (or “loose”) regulation for a power transformer. Powering a simple resistive load like this, a good power transformer should
exhibit a regulation percentage of less than 3%. Inductive loads tend to create a condition of worse voltage regulation, so this analysis with purely resistive loads was a “best-
case” condition.
There are some applications, however, where poor regulation is actually desired. One such case is in discharge lighting, where a step-up transformer is required to initially
generate a high voltage (necessary to “ignite” the lamps), then the voltage is expected to drop off once the lamp begins to draw current. This is because discharge lamps'
28
voltage requirements tend to be much lower after a current has been established through the arc path. In this case, a step-up transformer with poor voltage regulation suffices
nicely for the task of conditioning power to the lamp.
Another application is in current control for AC arc welders, which are nothing more than step-down transformers supplying low-voltage, high-current power for the welding
process. A high voltage is desired to assist in “striking” the arc (getting it started), but like the discharge lamp, an arc doesn't require as much voltage to sustain itself once the
air has been heated to the point of ionization. Thus, a decrease of secondary voltage under high load current would be a good thing. Some arc welder designs provide arc
current adjustment by means of a movable iron core in the transformer, cranked in or out of the winding assembly by the operator. Moving the iron slug away from the
windings reduces the strength of magnetic coupling between the windings, which diminishes no-load secondary voltage and makes for poorer voltage regulation.
No exposition on transformer regulation could be called complete without mention of an unusual device called a ferroresonant transformer. “Ferroresonance” is a
phenomenon associated with the behavior of iron cores while operating near a point of magnetic saturation (where the core is so strongly magnetized that further increases in
winding current results in little or no increase in magnetic flux).
While being somewhat difficult to describe without going deep into electromagnetic theory, the ferroresonant transformer is a power transformer engineered to operate in a
condition of persistent core saturation. That is, its iron core is “stuffed full” of magnetic lines of flux for a large portion of the AC cycle so that variations in supply voltage
(primary winding current) have little effect on the core's magnetic flux density, which means the secondary winding outputs a nearly constant voltage despite significant
variations in supply (primary winding) voltage. Normally, core saturation in a transformer results in distortion of the sine wave shape, and the ferroresonant transformer is no
exception. To combat this side effect, ferroresonant transformers have an auxiliary secondary winding paralleled with one or more capacitors, forming a resonant circuit tuned
to the power supply frequency. This “tank circuit” serves as a filter to reject harmonics created by the core saturation, and provides the added benefit of storing energy in the
form of AC oscillations, which is available for sustaining output winding voltage for brief periods of input voltage loss (milliseconds' worth of time, but certainly better than
nothing). (Figure below)
Ferroresonant transformer provides voltage regulation of the output.
In addition to blocking harmonics created by the saturated core, this resonant circuit also “filters out” harmonic frequencies generated by nonlinear (switching) loads in the
secondary winding circuit and any harmonics present in the source voltage, providing “clean” power to the load.
Ferroresonant transformers offer several features useful in AC power conditioning: constant output voltage given substantial variations in input voltage, harmonic filtering
between the power source and the load, and the ability to “ride through” brief losses in power by keeping a reserve of energy in its resonant tank circuit. These transformers
are also highly tolerant of excessive loading and transient (momentary) voltage surges. They are so tolerant, in fact, that some may be briefly paralleled with unsynchronized
AC power sources, allowing a load to be switched from one source of power to another in a “make-before-break” fashion with no interruption of power on the secondary side!
Unfortunately, these devices have equally noteworthy disadvantages: they waste a lot of energy (due to hysteresis losses in the saturated core), generating significant heat in
the process, and are intolerant of frequency variations, which means they don't work very well when powered by small engine-driven generators having poor speed regulation.
Voltages produced in the resonant winding/capacitor circuit tend to be very high, necessitating expensive capacitors and presenting the service technician with very
dangerous working voltages. Some applications, though, may prioritize the ferroresonant transformer's advantages over its disadvantages. Semiconductor circuits exist to
“condition” AC power as an alternative to ferroresonant devices, but none can compete with this transformer in terms of sheer simplicity.
 REVIEW:
 Voltage regulation is the measure of how well a power transformer can maintain constant secondary voltage given a constant primary voltage and wide
variance in load current. The lower the percentage (closer to zero), the more stable the secondary voltage and the better the regulation it will provide.
 A ferroresonant transformer is a special transformer designed to regulate voltage at a stable level despite wide variation in input voltage.
http://www.allaboutcircuits.com/vol_2/chpt_9/5.html
29
Spherical Magnet - rotating magnetic beacon as core coil – John Lord
From: hrhcrownprincejohnlord <hrhcrownprincejohnlord@yahoo.com>

Date: Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 12:23 PM
Subject: Re: Permanent magnet flip-flop: with possible with half gainer
To: Vincent J Cataldi <vincent.cataldi@gmail.com>
MEG Group:
I have been contacted by one of your members, who is one of my members in a global closed group of quantum science elites.
Your experiment about the bar magnet is easy to explain, but your entire understanding of what you have been trained about magnetism
needs to be updated from the current academic's limited paradigm of knowledge.
Quantum science, with the true understanding of superconductors, display unipolarity of two different "currents" in an aligned magnetic
material. It is called double current theory. With proper manipulation of a linear (bar) magnetic material, one can change the two
differentiated currents (N and S) into a one current (unipolarity with mutually operating currents).
Take a normal bar magnet, cut it in half, mechanically or with force. The two new pieces of bar magnets will have their own N/S polar ends.
The further you continue to cut in half these bar magnets, the more you further and further reduce the distance between the polar ends.
Now understand that in a bar magnet, there is the superconductor region displaying the unipolar region. This is in the center of a bar
magnet. Take two magnets, and a non-magnetized (aligned) piece of bar iron. Using all different variations, take the N pole of one bar
magnet and touch the N, S, and center of the second magnet. N/N will repel, N/S will attract, and the center will display no repulsion or
attraction. Turn the first bar magnet around and test the S pole to the second magnet. S/N attracts, S/S repels, and the center displays no
attraction or repulsion. Now turn the first bar magnet 90 degrees. Touch center/N, center/S, and center/center. There is no, no, no
repulsion or attraction with either contact. One could double this scientific testing by doing the second bar magnet to the first magnet, but the
results are the same as the first results.
What one needs to understand is the three (five) basic powers of the universe. Gravity, (unipolarity), electromagnetism, magnetism, and
electricity. What you are just seeing here are the inner to outer core forces of an atom, including any larger planetary body's inner core
quantum electrodynamics. Electricity is one current (repulsive force) of electrons and their orbit. Magnetism is one current (attractice
force) of protons and their orbit. Electromagnetism is the unification of both forces (repulsion and attraction) in the neutron orbit (1
proton, 1 electron) in a smaller orbit than the current atomic nuclear model. In the center of an atom are quantum singularities that
are the real source of gravity manifestation.
Now when you reduce the distance of the polar N and S poles, you force this magnetically aligned object to also reduce its differentiated
power of the electrical-repulsive (electron orbit) and magnetic-attractive (proton orbit).
If you can view an atomic model, what you are doing is scrunching down the electron orbit into the proton orbit, and turning it into an
outer neutron orbit. Current science says that "ions" are only protons and neutrons (with a ripped off electron orbit. This is wrong. The
electron orbit is scrunched and merged with the proton orbit, and one now has two neutron orbits in an atom. When you have these
double currents operating in the inner and outer neutron orbits you have superconductivity and unipolarity (with non-resistance and
a maximum force outward demonstration - Meissner force field).
If you were to continue your bar magnet cutting and then getting down to a near-rectangular/near-square shape, then start diagonally cutting
off the points (triangular ends, ... one more and more turns the rectangular/square magnet into a near-spherical shape. As one cuts off more
and more smaller points of this spiky object into a true spherical ball bearing (BB) shape one will not have either an N or S polar identity.
The object will display double currents, unified together, as a superconductor. There will be no more electrical/electron or
magnetic/proton forces, but a unified electromagnetic/neutron force.
If/When you are able to physically able to make such a bar magnet into a unipolar sphere, you will have a true superconductor material. It will
display double currents operating in mutual currents (one in a forward direction, the other in a reverse direction).
30
When you are further able to scrunch down these two neutron orbits (composed of proton and electrons, ... and their quarks ... that
scientists/physicists have gotten screwed up denying that electrons do not have quarks - but they do ... you will have one conjoined neutron
orbit at a neuclear (nanometer distance) of the atoms. You are on the nanometer/hypercolloidal barrier where physical matter connects
with dark matter/dark energy (ala alchemical "ether").
If there are any further questions on what is said, I can be contacted.

LORD Enterprises LLC
LORD Consulting
Govt/Mil Consulting
John Robert Lord
President/CEO
Carson City, NV
Fremont (San Francisco), CA
JohnLord9@gmail.com
THE MEISSNER EFFECT
The Meissner Effect is an effect whereby the magnetic field The typical way of making an electromagnet is to place, say a soft
created in a superconductor will repel all other magnetic fields, iron inside a copper wire solenoid carrying direct current. Thus, a
regardless of whether they are changing or not. This means that if NORTH POLE is form at one end of the solenoid and a SOUTH
a magnet is placed over a superconductor it will levitate there POLE at the other end. Therefore, if the north pole of a permanent
inside the magnetic field. (say bar) magnet is brought to the north pole of the solenoid
(electromagnet) it will be repel away. If the south pole of the
The amazing fact about the magnetic levitation observed in permanent magnet is brought close to the north pole of the
superconductors is that even solenoid it will be attracted to it.
though the two objects repel each other, they are not pushed away
entirely, but remain ‘stuck’ a certain distance apart. If two normal
magnets’ North poles where placed facing each other, the QUESTION 1:
magnets would be pushed apart by a force that exists (even ----------
though minutely) to a distance of infinity. Now what if instead of a copper wire, a superconductive wire is
used to form the solenoid and a soft iron is place inside it, then
However, a superconductor will repel a magnet a certain distance everything is dip into a liquid helium or nitrogen in other to cool it
but then keep it at that distance. This is seen effectively in the below its critical temperature, thus making it to be superconductive
video where, initially, the objects are kept apart, but when the (with zero resistance).Once the direct current source is turn on,
magnet is lifted, the superconductor comes with it. electric current flow through the solenoid of superconductive wire,
therefore an electromagnet is created. In the context of those facts
This is due to the way in which a superconductor sets up its about superconductor with respect to the phenomenon called
magnetic field. When a magnetic field is created in a MEISSNER EFFECT stated above, would the superconductive
superconductor, poles are created to repel all fields. electromagnet behaves like the copper electromagnet when a
permanent magnet is brought close to it( i.e. their like poles of the
The Meissner Effect is different from regular diamagnetism in that superconductive electromagnet and the permanent magnet repels
it repels all magnetic fields, not just changing ones. Unlike a each other while their unlike poles attract each other.)
regular magnet, which has just a North Pole and a South Pole, a
superconductor can create many poles to ensure that all poles are ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
repelled depending on what it is trying to repel. This same effect, ------------------------------------
however, is responsible for holding the magnet at a certain
distance away. This is because when a magnet is pulled away SOME PROPERTIES OF SOFT IRON
from it, the poles are reversed to hold the magnet in place. ----------------------------
31
1. Soft iron is attracted to a permanent magnet when it is brought -----------

close to it. Now, my question is this: Is there a particular material that lacks
the first property (1) stated above (i.e it does not get attracted to a
2. When a soft iron is place inside a solenoid carrying an electric permanent magnet when brought close it) but still possess the
current it becomes magnetized, thus an electromagnet is form. second property(2) (i.e it becomes magnetized when place in a
solenoid to form an electromagnet.
QUESTION 2:
unipolarity of two different "currents" in an aligned magnetic Magnetic-attractive (proton orbit).

material.
Double current theory.
(Unipolarity with mutually operating currents). Down the electron orbit into the proton orbit,
into an outer neutron orbit.
There is the superconductor region displaying the unipolar region The electron orbit is scrunched and merged with the proton orbit,
Now turn the first bar magnet 90 degrees. now has two neutron orbits in an atom.
Double currents operating in the inner and outer neutron orbits you
have superconductivity and unipolarity (with non-resistance and a
Gravity, (unipolarity), electromagnetism, magnetism, and maximum force outward
electricity. Meissner force field).
Inner to outer core forces of an atom,
Electricity is one current (repulsive force) of electrons and their
orbit. Spherical ball bearing (BB) shape
Magnetism is one current (attractice force) of protons and their Have either a N or S polar identity.
orbit. Double currents, unified together, as a superconductor
Electromagnetism is the unification of both forces (repulsion and Unified electromagnetic/neutron force.
attraction)
In the neutron orbit (1 proton, 1 electron) in a smaller orbit than the
current atomic nuclear model. In the center of an atom are Currents operating in mutual currents
quantum singularities that are the real source of gravity You will have one conjoined neutron orbit at a neuclear
manifestation. (nanometer distance) of the atoms.
Nanometer/hyper colloidal barrier

Reduce its differentiated power Physical matter connects with dark matter/dark energy (ala
Electrical-repulsive (electron orbit) alchemical "ether").
32
George – advice, comments, questions - NEW: October 12 2009
From: george gray <canowindra123@bigpond.com>

Date: Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 12:54 AM
Vince,
Well!!! You worked out exactly what I was trying to get you to understand.
You said:
after I learned that only the end points and interior of each coil has a magnet flux, but not the outside of the solenoid except at
the ends.
You are on the track to understanding how to get free energy.
Best regards mate,
George.
Sent: Friday, October 09, 2009 2:00 PM
George:
Thank you for your time & effort answering my questions again.
I am thinking to come up with the most simple manner to solve the puzzle - and never contradict anything you stated - and I
asked only because I had a suspicion that I was heading off the track.
Phases was a confusing term, and I know nothing about the electrical phases so this confusion did not occur to me. I only
tried to show three 'steps' as one rotor electromagnet passes by one stator electromagnet - start, middle, and end; I did this to
try to see a method to invoke an impulsive flip-flop reversal of polarity and guess where the primary loops might best be
placed.
The electromagnet 'snaking' from the rotor to the stator to form a single continuous electromagnet came about as I worked to
identify a simple yet efficient design to repel the rotor - after I learned that only the end points and interior of each coil has a
magnet flux, but not the outside of the solenoid except at the ends.
I continue to think of how to place components to accomplish this in the most simple manner. Each time I read again what you
have shared I discover that you said more than I initially saw.
If I ever do experiment with this split serpentine rotor/stator electromagnet design I will surely share all my test results with you
for your possible benefit. It might just be a powerful idea, but it has many unknowns and I was surely straying from simplicity.
Who knows, it is likely that the only benefit might be to say - do not try this at home, it is a waste of time.
Thanks George, Vince
On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 9:53 AM, george gray <canowindra123@bigpond.com> wrote:
Vince,
Thanks for your email and the attached drawing. It looks interesting but I can't comment more than that because it is new to
me. Please let me know if it is successful when you put it to the test.
In my motor there are no phases as per the regular multi phase electric motor. My motor has many polarity reversals and
many impulses but no phase shift as I think you understand phase shift.
33
The poles are all North or all South and it is the repulsion of the like poles that moves the rotor. The poles are changing
rapidly many times a second, but they are always opposing each other.
When I mentioned a serpentine coil it was only to try and explain that the permanent magnet does not necessarily need to
pass by the face of the pole but can create poles by passing by one side of some of the coils in the serpentine. In so doing
poles can be created at both ends of the serpentine. The magnet is not then trying to pass by the actual pole created in
opposition to it.
Best regards,
George.
George:
An idea popped into my head

about a week ago, and I am drawn
to it. I worked hard to make
a drawing to study it better,
because it confuses me some as I
try to calculate the direction
(polarity) of the electromagnets as
they flip-flop, how to do this with a
determined result in the coils, and
even the number of changes per
phase shift/coil puzzles me some.
Also, not sure if I am just fighting
myself during these transitions.
I attached a simple gif

image Serpentine_Coil2.gif to
show three phases - and I envision
twelve coils per rotor and stator
each - This image shows only a
few to begin to document the
concept but this image has many
limitations. I was not able to make
it look round - so imagine these
flat strips as simplified concepts
only. Also I am not clear where the primary loops might best be placed - many and/or multiple places were considered , how
many, nor the rectangular permanent magnets placement - I put in one centered in the inter-coil space for simplicity. I am first
most interested in the split serpentine coil concept, and the coil/space arrangement around a circle.
I do see a possible need for a core in order to bend the corners, and improve pushing power at the terminations of each coil -
and I am thinking of something like copper bar stock (1/2 x 1/4 inch) with perpendicular pads soldered just past the ends of
each coil segment - as they transition across from stator to rotor (and back again). These are shown in copper color. [copper
relaxation time is10 to -19th power - is this too fast, or too slow?]
Half of each image phase-slice is on the rotor, and half is on the stator –blue line. The U shape of the coil is not what I think
might be best - but a smooth curve was harder to draw, so I made little horse shoe magnet shaped coils in the drawings so I
can see the overall concept. Also, I see the ends 'connecting' the rotor and stator coils more smoothly; no sharp turns
anywhere.
If time allows, please take a look at this rough drawing and tell me if I am off the wall, or perhaps have a workable idea - and
perhaps even your design is a refinement of this concept. In any event, I wish to minimize wasted time, and seek an opinion
wiser than mine. If I need to say more or draw more, just ask.
Any ideas or direction would be appreciated very much.
Thanks George, Vince
PS - Thanks for the words on back emf - I did not understand it at all but you made me understand what it is, and I went back
to the magnet falling down a copper tube to see it in cause/action. Thanks
34
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 9:06 AM, george gray <canowindra123@bigpond.com> wrote:
Vince,
The back EMF would "interfere" or in other words "oppose" the action giving rise to the change in the primary windings and the motor would not run. As the
permanent magnets tried to pass the primary windings they would create like poles in them, which would oppose them, plus back EMFs, which would oppose the
induced currents. It's always good to hit the books and study up on things to solve perplexing questions.
Have you read up on how Tesla used bifilar windings to overcome back EMF?
Best regards mate.
George.
----- Original Message -----
From: Vincent J Cataldi
To: george gray Sent: Wednesday, September 16, 2009 7:46 AM
Subject: Re: GGM2.A.2C.Doc
George:
A statement you wrote is perplexing me some:
"The secret of this motor revolves around "impulses". When you try to overcome Faraday's Law and Lenz's Law the method of winding the primary windings and
having them excite the secondary windings is unique and has not been done before. By using impulses the back emf does not have time to interfere because the
direction has changed; also the repulsive pole created, changes to an attracting pole and changes again to let go in time. This can only be achieved by impulses,
which are produced when the permanent magnets pass the primary windings, which are wound in a unique method incorporating the remote parts of them on the
secondary windings."
Specifically, I am puzzled by the back emf statement; how can if interfere? I understand how an electrical flow can interfere with back emf (kill the flow), but I do not
comprehend what can be negative with back emf or its' interference, or what it may interfere with. ...and when it does interfere, what are the symptoms? Impulses:
are these the short, virtually non-stop, excitement (change) of the primary windings - reversing what was? Impulse time control: have I addressed this enough to
begin R&D efforts, or is a more sophisticated analysis needed to allow a very simple control feature?
"For question #3 I was looking for either electrical or magnetic." is AC (not pulsed DC) an unnatural current flow?
I believe it is a good idea for me to go and read (study) again everything you wrote on this subject - to see what assumptions I may have made incorrectly. It is
obvious now that I had assumed much, and incorporated many false leads into my understanding of what you wrote.
You are very kind to me, and very respectful in so many ways. Thank you Sir!
Vince
-sure wish I knew how to use a CAD system to draw something I can see and manipulate.
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 7:25 AM, george gray <canowindra123@bigpond.com> wrote:
Vince,
I can see that you have a very intuitive mind and will be able to solve the issues relating to Faraday and Lenz.
For question #3 I was looking for either electrical or magnetic.
Keep thinking mate.

Best regards,
George.

To: george gray Sent: Tuesday, September 15, 2009 2:14 PM
George:
Had time for a short nap and awoke with an idea. ... but then I thought it was Friday, so?
This is not a new idea, but an idea I rejected earlier because it seemed too good to be true, too easy. It is however a more simple solution than I presented, which
makes me hopeful.
35
If I take the magnet falling down the cooper tube concept, and apply it directly to the 'spring', is it the same? If the solenoid is wrapped around copper, or the tightly
wound copper wires of the solenoid create a virtual copper tube, will a solenoid behave like a bar magnet - a north pole at one end, a south pole at the other end,
and a graduated change between these two extremes - neutral at the center.
If yes, then two snakes coiled into a circle - almost touching, polarized the same, might just have the magnetic attraction and repulsion between these two 'springs'
to set the system spinning if designed with proper proximity. Starting from a TDC alignment position (align the two gaps), there would be a repulsion, pushing the
strong end of the rotor spring coil toward the neutral center of the stator spring. At this point the stator would increasingly attract the rotor end approaching. The
magnetic fields of these two electromagnets spinning around at high speed would try to find a resonate harmonic 'vibration' - as they induce changes in each other
- probably in a very complex manner, but a manner that self-amplifies the induced effect and frequency (almost continuous induced change == very VHF).
During this (each) cycle, the voltage direction is toggled back and forth (12 changes, or 24 half changes per cycle), reversing voltage direction each time, and
during the instant of the change, back emf energy is able to enter the system to power the load, which in this case may be only a mechanical work load - but I still
smell a Tesla Switch in here too somehow. Thus a heavy fly wheal is valuable to moderate all instantaneous physical work demands and absorb the back emf
energy input.
George, not sure how I got here from your questions. Just a gut feeling perhaps. ... and a nap.
Vince
On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 4:03 PM, Vincent J Cataldi <vincent.cataldi@gmail.com> wrote:
George:
I numbered your questions (below) in the order of how I had to answer them in oder to know what to think of the questions you asked first. I suspect that you are
hinting at the use of a toroid, a concept I played with to 'direct' magnetic flux lines through a primary coil loop. It may imply instead that I need no buss line
connecting the primary loops, if they are within the 'spring', but then how do I get a step-up transformer effect, I wonder. But as usual, your questions make me
think and directly give me no answer, so I am not even sure what you are driving me toward. Logically: there is someway to do something in a more simple manner
than I theorized; or something required which I ignored totally.
I will sleep on this to seek insight.
It is always a pleasure to communicate with you my friend; thanks very much. I love solving a good puzzle. I do hope I can help you too.
nZo
Is a current induced in a straight conductor or rod when it passes at 90 degrees through the lines of force or flux of a magnet?
#6 I must conclude YES - although it is not intuitive to me except by answering your questions below in nearly reverse order.
Do the ends of the rod need to be joined together for a current to flow?
#5 A complete circuit is established around the circumference of the rod. This is a new thought for me... The flow would be be pole to pole, but through the rod.
If a current flows what sort of current is it?
#3. DC - this is a guess because AC is not natural in my opinion.

Is something produced in the rod to repel the magnet and if so what is it?
#4 I must assume the answer is must be the same as my answer below marked as #1 A change of flux always causes an electric current to flow, and this produces
a magnetic field, and this opposes the action which caused the change.
If you drop a one inch magnet down an inch and one eighth copper pipe six foot long, what will happen?
#1. It induces an electric current, and thus a magnetic field - the result is that magnet will drop quite slowly as the induced magnetic field apposes the work done by
the falling magnet.
Do you know the instant percentage of applied voltage that a back EMF has?
#2. My understanding is that for a nano-second, the energy available is virtually infinite - and thus an infinite percentage is possible. This virtual infinite energy is
limited by the inductive load of the instantaneous system - the energy flowing into the system is equal to what is required to maintain the active process.
Regards mate,
George.

To: george gray Sent: Saturday, September 12, 2009 12:16 PM
36
George:
Please excuse the delay, I wanted to address this beyond what you specifically asked.
As I understand it, the scenario you describe does nothing, but if the coil wires are connected directly or through a load the answer is quite different. With a
complete circuit, a magnet moving into and through the 'surface' within the coil induces flow of current; the magnitude of the current is proportional to the strength
of the magnet field, the speed of the change (motion of the magnet), and the gradient density of the cross sectional area within the coil. The direction of the voltage
is reversed when the magnet is removed; but nothing happens without a change of flux, so the magnetic field and power only oppose the action causing change.
A magnet forced into a coil will encounter resistance as a counter-magnetic field is established to oppose the action. The voltage flowing as current creates a
temporary induced magnetic field as well as an induced electrical flow. All this happens near instantly, and only in response to a change of flux.
I am unsure of many more subtle question - or theoretical - which I have been seeking answers for:
- does the voltage flip as the magnet exits in the same direction?
if a extra long bar magnet was created with a very long neutral center, and the north end of the magnet was pushed toward the coil - thus promoting a change of
flux and an electric current, will the direction of the current reverse when the north pole passes through the coil and exits, thus traveling away from the coils' 'cross
sectional surface'?
- what is the difference using a bar magnet magnetized end to end if the north pole is used first, then the south pole is used first - is one more effective?
Conversely, if the south pole of the magnet were to approach the coil, same as above, would the voltage be reversed as the south pole approached the coil, with
respect to the voltage of approaching the coil with a north pole?
- What happens if a bar magnet is magnetized front to back?
What happens if the flux of a coil were changed by approaching the magnet with a magnet which is polarized front to back? If both the north and south poles
entered at the same time, and or if the north entered first, immediately followed by the south pole.
- what happens if the magnet is passed close to but not through the coil?
If a magnet is passed into the inner core of the coil, a flux is changed; so if a magnet is passed by the outer edge of the coil rather than just inside the coil, will it
cause a similar change but with a smaller magnitude- all other variables held constant.
If I pass a magnet north pole across the center of the coil and very close to it, but not through it, will the voltage direction reverse as this north pole passes the coil
as though exiting the coil? Or stated another way; is the direction of electrical flow depend on if the magnet is approaching the virtual 'surface' within the coil - and
moving away from it? or is this a factor of the right hand rile of coils, perhaps? - dependent on the change with respect to the direction of the coil windings?
Reversed engineered solution

Take the spring, bend it into a circle with the tail almost touching the mouth; place a magnetic metal at the two end points; these become the north and south pole
of an electromagnet. Position them to divert the flux field off to the side in a fashion appropriate to use for pushing against each other, and the permanent magnets
of the other system (stator and rotor). This coil is used for the rotor, and is an isolated transformer inductively powered by the second similar coil reversals. Make
the round spring a rectangle for a better surface area of close contact for better inductive coupling, and field collapse enhancements in each other...
Next make a second coil for the stator - this time add a series of (primary coil) loops inside the center of the spring coil (solenoid) along two buss lines - each
connected to a series of primary coil loops, and staggered so that every other one is wound the same and the buss line is looped around the spring solenoid to
serve as a step up transformer.
The two sets of primary loops are wound opposite each other and positioned so that as a magnet passes one it generates a voltage flux change, and thus a
voltage, which is amplified by the step-up transformer looped around the spring coil; and each successive primary loop is positioned so that everyone is reversing
the voltage of both of it neighbors. I suspect these primary loops are perpendicular on one plane to the the secondary coil around them.
Because I can not envision how to pass a magnet into the coil center; and I suspect that passing the magnet just next to but not in the loop is useful but not too
efficient; I propose a virtual insertion and retreat of a magnet. This might be effectively done (if required) by placing a tiny magnet behind each primary loop so that
when a primary magnet on the rotor passes the primary loop of the stator coil, the flux of the tiny stationary magnet is pushed (or pulled) through the center of the
loop; to generate a powerful and fast change of flux in the primary, which is induced to a higher voltage in the secondary (spring), which in turn inductively charges
the spring (secondary) of the spinning rotor spring coil, which is also an isolated electromagnet. [but not a step up transformer] I suspect the two spring coils can be
placed to charge in equal or opposite direction - using the right hand rule.
This is further enhanced if required, by dissecting the overall circular spring coil into a series of equally long segments, stretching the spring and placing an iron
plate at the end of each new end; perhaps creating twelve (360/12=30) - to create a push every thirty degrees.
George - if I am anywhere close - you are brilliant - or at least you began that way as a child. I find this possibility very exciting. Please redirect me as required, and
put me to work, especially if further clarification is needed.
Smiling – Vince
37
Vince,
Please answer these questions.
I have a wound coil of wire with the ends open and not joined together or to a load. If I insert a magnet into the coil will North and South poles be established at
opposite ends of the coil? What will happen if I withdraw the magnet from the coil?
I find the best way to get a point across sometimes is to ask questions.
Let me know what you think or have found out.
Best regards,
George.

To: george gray Sent: Wednesday, September 09, 2009 2:03 PM
George:
I really like the potential of what you have described to me, but I am smart enough to know when I am too ignorant. Back to the Books, so to speak...
Based on your direction I found - "MIT Physics Lecture: Electromagnetism - 16 - Faraday's Law & Lenz Law" - - a google video lecture series - and I began working
back through the lectures back to lecture 01. Now I will redo from start to end. Some mind boggling demonstrations. I surely wish you had bandwidth independent
internet pricing. I find this professor a delight and very bright. I did not know Lenz or his laws, but knew I needed this field of knowledge to understand how to refine
placement of coils, solenoids, and magnets to work as a team.
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-4948132895317456720# Formatted: Font: 9 pt
This is just a note to say that I am working, and thinking; thanks for the direction.
I will get back when I think it would not be a waste of your time.
I believe I see the concepts' potential (in part) to oscillate current direction very quickly as one or more magnets approach and then pass one or more series of
coils, but I need research and perhaps some R&D to study coil alignment within transformer coils - choice of vertical, horizontal, etc - perpendicular to x, y , z axis -
I lack the real basics that are second nature to you - I suspect.
OR
I also will do anything specific as you may wish to direct me.
Thanks,
Vince
On Sun, Sep 6, 2009 at 12:51 AM, george gray <canowindra123@bigpond.com> wrote:
Vince,
It's good to know that you are thinking hard about things. There are many things you could come up with but be careful not to get sidetracked---keep it simple.
I don't have the facilities or the time to do much research work, but if you work in harmony with what you know you will come up with the right answer.
I can see that you are capable of finding the right method in which to use this type of technology and I'm pleased that you are working with your mind on it.
I will give Carlos some more time before troubling him again because he is or supposed to be working on some more drawings and he said to give him a few days
a couple of weeks ago. I'll just wait awhile.
Just something to think about: The shorter the pulse the less time for Faraday and Lenz. Before the opposing pole is established or the backEMF gets established
the pulse has stopped and is ready to go again; it acts like a teaser but never gets caught.
Best regards,
George.

To: george gray Sent: Sunday, September 06, 2009 3:03 PM
38
George:
I thank you - I am thinking with my thinking cap on - again, with aether powered lights atop.
Somehow, I learn as I sleep, so I need time to think about what you have just shared; and to see the image you described. BUT it is an intriguing picture that you
drew for me - I saw much of it without going the last step - or I went a step or two too far perhaps. I will try to summarize the history of my thinking on this subject
which evolved into the document I sent you..
As I began, I decided to begin to accumulate parts for testing and hopeful ability to make something work - before money buys nothing. I began with a purchase of
12 N52 4 inch by 2 inch by 1/2 inch monster magnets to be able to test and experiment. I envisioned using an adjustable iron rod placed into slots of the stator to
control the reach of these magnets as they pass the primary with some precision and control - also might act as a speed control rod. I planned to test each corner
of these magnets with a galvanometer to place the proper 'one' corner to become the trailing edge 'snapper' as it passes the primary (based on the asymmetrical
nature of the edges as described in The Secrets of Magnets). Also considered an iron shield around the leading edge and the other two corners, to sharpen the
trailing edge corner gradient.
Then I began to think about the coils, and realized that many small powerful magnets may be much better than a few massively powerful magnets - as the large
magnets might have more gradual gradients with flux gradients over a much larger area.. Many small magnets might allow many small primaries & secondaries per
stator with few (two) rotor coils, and greater timing control I suspected. I also contemplated multiple primary coils per secondary connected at different positions
along the secondary winding - to test - It may have a Variac type transformer effect with variance in voltage output (and so speed), and timing due to varying
inductive capacitive charge time.
But, I was thinking of this use of multiple primaries as a test-platform to align, with trial & error, the inductive capacitance charging time with the proper position of
the secondaries alignment when the two electromagnets explosively repel. I was preparing to ask John Carter for a coil expert to discuss this with, in order to begin
with something that had a hope of working. He was ready with individuals who were interested in performing small 'isolated' tests with proper equipment and
experience- I suspect this is still an option. The image you just drew is very interesting.
After thinking BIG for a month I went back and bought many very small magnets such as small disks (1, 1/2 and 1/4 inch disks), hollow washer like disks, spheres,
and 256 - N52 1/4 inch cubes, believing it would be easier to abruptly 'snap' the field off more quickly as the magnet passes out of range. I expected that I could
combine several small magnets if required to fine tune results of testing. Also, I thought it might be interesting to put two magnets near each other with a south pole
facing each other at the center and a north pole at the leading and trailing edge (or reversed) - this I suspected would force a series of abrupt changes with sharp
gradients at the TDC position, and at the leading and trailing edges as well. This idea came from a drawing of a Bedini Scalar Rotor - attached. Using the sphere
magnet as a core also was inspired by this image.
I also liked the greatly reduced cost of the smaller parts, and the smaller primary coils which would be easier to build and position for efficiency - and increased
frequency of change possible using less powerful magnets with a smaller field of influence - but I was trying to see this as a switch - a high frequency rotor switch
with torque. It seemed that the stator coils could easily be tapped for dual use - perhaps.
I also believed that the inductive charge time of an auto-transformer was very smart of you, as it would allow the electromagnets to get past TDC for a push in the
proper direction without fighting itself. It also was like putting a capacitor in the circuit, and a resistor as well. Auto ignition coil internet pages reported charge time
ranging from one to four Milli-seconds. Proper coil design could adjust the step-up transformer voltage properties, and the inductive charge time should be
adjustable to suit mechanical placement options, I hoped. Both seem likely to contribute to ever increasing speed - until it resonates.
I did question what would happen if multiple primary coil loops were connected to a multi-strand, air core secondary (encased in epoxy) acting like a electromagnet
but I never could get past the need for a complete circuit for the secondary - a load for current flow - except recursively connecting to another auto-coil - this was
either crazy or quite insightful - I can not get an experts opinion. Such a recursive wiring design might require a diode, or electret - and suddenly we are not so
simple any longer - unless it was perfect and electrets worked without problems, and I can put ever increasing voltage into a step-up transformer with beneficial
effects. Another possibility - I wondered if multiple primary coil loops were connected to a single secondary, such a design might serve as an inductive load
capacitor without acting like a short circuit.
Also, Len'z Law is dyslexically embedded in my mind, and I am not sure how this might interfere with or compliment the reversal you achieve intentionally after the
secondaries pass and repel with BEMF. All this was pure theory based on reading, dreaming, and asking questions of experts. (and I wanted a well thought
through concept, tested through 'Modularized Tests' using John Carters contacts & associates).
Next, I have a fascination with the potential spherical magnets offer with their unusual properties, such as a super-conducting core of the primaries to allow benefit
of a core that can not saturate, and the sphere first attracts and then opposes all magnetic fields with an equal force, even multiple interacting fields. It seemed that
we could make a light-house like beacon with a sphere sandwiched between two opposing washer-disk magnets sweeping from within a coil, and powered by a
tiny passing magnet cube, perhaps.
I wished to experiment with a stacked series of nested spiral primary coils wired both in series and parallel; with (and without) a spherical magnet core which might
still allow the speed of change (collapse) equally as fast as possible with an air core coil.
Although some of this above is fascinating to me, I added many ideas only after you began your efforts, and I jumped from GGM1 to GGM2 - still I was/am wary of
trying complicated ideas when simple is best. I also wish I knew more, and had more experience to make sure I do not give ME a 30KV jolt.
None of this above is why I began to write however, except to say thank you, and I am thinking again.
39
I write to warn you of my worry concerning Carlos - or at least share with you all I know since you two met.. I believe your stated reason for his silence was both
kind and wrong. I believe that he believes that he understands your design well, and I am quite sure he believes that your design will work - and work well. I am
troubled by his lack of prompt communication with you. Hate to think what it may imply.
Below is everything he told me after he visited you - he responded to my question. It is brief, but I believe he assumes way to much in general - he was always right
- and he assumes he has all that he needs to 'go it alone', in my opinion. And he was so eager to be in charge, that he was never helpful as a team player as we
tried to get him involved constructively. The only other option I see is that he or his family had a serious problem. Also, he chatted with me daily until he did not
need me, and he just ignored me until I forwarded an email from you stating he had visited and was working with you - then he answered me tersely. See email
pasted below which I believe shows his belief in your motor design.
John Carter was communicating with him often also, and was planning a visit to Sydney sometime soon I think. John was working hard to help me prepare for you
to review the plan - I am sure he is still interested in helping with integrity & wisdom. It may be interesting to ask John if Carlos has been in touch, or see if Carlos
will respond to an email from John. I hate to think negatively about anyone, I hate more to write it down, especially when I am wrong; but I have been thinking this
way for quite sometime, I trust my gut, and felt you should know.
Best Regards my Friend,
Vince
---------- Forwarded message ----------

From: techieatwork <techieatwork@gmail.com> Date: Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 12:30 AM
Subject: Re: what can it do
To: Vincent J Cataldi <vincent.cataldi@gmail.com>
Cc: John Carter <johngc@gmail.com>
Hi Vince:
It's basically a massive torque motor it does not generate electric power itself, but the 3" shaft can be used to run alternator(s) for power generation, or for any
other stuff.. like mount to a gear box and run your car, or your semi-truck... or other kind of vehicles :)
it's self contained, no need for external batteries to power it..
I am also eager to finish the drawing of stator part, so George can review and approve for release :)
Vincent J Cataldi wrote:
Carlos:
Can you share with us what GGM1 can do?
Is it a torsion drive only, or like a Tesla switch, can it directly drive (power) an inductive load?
I hate to seem impatient - think of it eager - please.
Vince
On Sat, Sep 5, 2009 at 12:09 AM, george gray <canowindra123@bigpond.com> wrote:
Hi Vince,
The control of a Tesla switch idea never occurred to me---something to think about.
The secret of this motor revolves around "impulses". When you try to overcome Faraday's Law and Lenz's Law the method of winding the primary windings and
having them excite the secondary windings is unique and has not been done before. By using impulses the back emf does not have time to interfere because the
direction has changed; also the repulsive pole created, changes to an attracting pole and changes again to let go in time. This can only be achieved by impulses,
which are produced when the permanent magnets pass the primary windings, which are wound in a unique method incorporating the remote parts of them on the
secondary windings.
I have not divulged this part to anyone yet, not even Carlos. I have been waiting to hear some criticism about what I gave to Carlos but nothing yet---perhaps his
silence is evidence that he thinks it won't work.
I want you to put your thinking cap on.
Imagine a long copper spring about 2 foot long (length is not important) and in the centre region there are many extra coils on the spring making the inner space
reduced because of the number of coils. Now bend this spring until it is in a circle almost touching itself at each end like a snake about to eat its tail. If it had DC on
it and a load, it would be an electromagnetic coil with a North and South pole facing each other.
If a permanent magnet passes the centre area where the concentrated coils are, a current is induced in the coil if it is connected to the load, which is the remote
part wound about the round secondary windings. Now imagine that the spring is not round but rectangular but still bent into a circle etc. The permanent magnets
40
can pass by the centre area with the concentrated coils and induce currents in them; they do not have to pass by the poles, which oppose and then attract in this
particular method.
Again the trick is to remember "IMPULSES" . The length of each impulse and the associated field collapses in the primary windings is the method of overcoming
Faraday and Lenz's laws.
That is just something to get you thinking.
The shorter the excitation impulses from the passing of the permanent magnets the better; the end shape of the permanent magnet is also very important to get
this effect.
All this I expected to perfect in R&D.
If you have any suggestions regarding other methods to produce the necessary impulses then by all means share them with me; my final ideas are not yet set in
concrete.
Also, because I sent you some info on ignition systems using the auto transformer does not mean that it is the way to go. I was just showing you what you asked
for. Just an ordinary transformer circuit may be better for a number of reasons; we need speed of impulses and their effects without delays, however small.
Best regards,
George.

To: george gray Sent: Saturday, September 05, 2009 7:53 AM
George:
I am very pleased you are impressed with the effort I put into your design. It was my goal to think it through in an organized written form so you would see I was not
being lazy and just asking for a gift - an easy way out of my problem. I also had great hope of getting John Carter to sub-out small experiments by farming out
experiments to carefully selected individuals who had expertise and equipment to deal with small aspects of the overall project. We had people ready to do so, but I
was stopped before this part of the plan could begin - but it is still a possibility. That is why I concentrated on a simple wooden test platform which was fast, cheap,
and safe to begin testing, and I tried listing every possible question so any assumptions can be identified easily. It seemed that initially using only two pairs of coils
would allow easy coil design comparisons.
I did believe that a thirty degree separation might be required, but I tried to design a modular test platform conducive to adding more stator components, because I
found many unknowns in the design of the individual coils - wire size, number of windings, coil-type, wiring circuit, and my wish to test asymmetrical placement
around the 360 degree of the stator - tiny differentials of a quartz crystal - as I was told this had great effects in initial testing.
I believed that using two (or three) rotor coils - and at least that many stator coil sets, your device might double as a switch which could be used as a unique
method to control a Tesla switch to drive an inductive load directly, while also providing a high torque motor to drive a generator, but this may be crazy - I can not
quite see this yet. I think I can smell it, but not see it - too many unknowns still.
I made the decision to share the document with you in its' rough form, just in case it gave you an idea through even one question, perhaps. I also found so many
questions that it seemed very likely that I dreamed up variations that were not the same solution you arrived at. Also, I stopped working on the project for a long
time, and the thought of wasting all the effort bothered me - I had to hope you could find some usefulness therein.
If I can do more to help you, please ask or direct me. I stopped because it is a GG Motor, and you are now in complete control because I stopped. I had no moral
choice that I could see. If the world is made fully isolated and fragmented, I have parts to do some trial and error attempts to survive - but until then I elected to give
you complete control over your own life.
Respectfully,
Vince
Vince,
I'm impressed with the effort you have been putting in with regard to my motor design.
It is late at night now and I work every day as an electrician with my son. I do it mainly to keep fit and at 72 I can still work like a man of 45 years of age. Today we
wired a steel shed with a high roof---lot of ladder work----and lots of up and down. We did a ten hour day of hard yakka with lots of drilling for saddling and fixing.
We have another hard day tomorrow and so I will read your document again and get back to you later.
41
Just a quick note: Originally I worked out a rotor at least 500mm in diameter and 12 magnets on the rotor and in the stator relating to 12 primary windings on the
rotor and in the stator. There are 12 secondary or high magnetic windings on the rotor and the stator. This means that every 30 degrees there are magnets and
windings. The more collapsing fields in a revolution the more free energy. The large diameter of the mainly non-metal rotor keeps the magnetic fields away from
the axle of the rotor.
Even at 1000 rpm there will be a lot of free energy from the aether. I envisage two very close together repulsions and free energy spikes at or about top
dead centre on each of the 12 high magnetic windings on the rotor and in the stator. The primary windings will give two excitations and collapses----
one from the leading edge of the winding and one from the lagging edge of the winding, which means that the 12 high magnetic windings will have two
repulsions and reverse polarity free energy spikes on both the rotor and in the stator. 12x12=144x2=288 excitations and collapses with free energy
spikes on the rotor and 288 excitations and collapses with free energy spikes in the stator----that's 576 excitations and collapses with free energy
spikes in one revolution. Magnetism moves much faster than the speed of light and we don't have the capacity to build a machine that will cope with
that speed----but we don't need to have a machine like that. Can you imagine 576 excitations and collapses and free energy spikes from the aether per
revolution? At 1000 rpm there would be 576,000 free energy spikes per minute and 9,600 per second, which means 400 free energy spikes per second
on each of the 24 high magnetic windings. We need to keep those figures in mind when determining the best speed.
Switches in the primary windings wires that go to the high magnetic windings can be used for speed control and switching off.
I must go to bed because it is almost 1:30 am and I have to be up at 5 am.
Best regards,
George.

To: george gray ; John Carter Sent: Wednesday, September 02, 2009 12:13 PM
Subject: GGM2.A.2C.Doc
George:
I waited for the new month to send this to be respectful of your bandwidth allocation, if you should elect to download it - it is a bit more than 2 meg.
This is a work in progress, which I abandoned shortly after you received the death threats - I decided I had to protect you even if the risk was remote.
Also, it is a bit rough because this is in the process of converting from GGM1 to GGM2. Initially I went to design the most simple possible device to achieve your
design explicitly, in the most simple manner, adding nothing that was not required. I shared my various stages of document development with John Carter to
protect the ideas in a responsible Library, & eventually Carlos - once I invited him to participate to draw pictures. [John likely has an archive of all versions and I do
also if you wish an earlier version before it became a GGM2 document].
Things changed, once you began to develop your own design of what I called GGM1, I decided to keep working for about a week - to document and explore more
complicated features and areas of interest to me. It is much more questions to be answered, rather than solution answers. This change from GGM1 to GGM2 was
never completed and so this document has a rough draft feel to it. I hope it is not a waste of your time.
Still, I imagine I may have enough here that you may find some benefit - either because of ideas, questions, or reference material contained.
I send it for you, even though I respect you as the expert, and I will not be surprised if there is nothing of value herein that is useful for you. I actually wonder if my
idea for a prototype test platform may be the most useful, but whatever it may be, I am hopeful it helps you to see what I worked on to develop what you began
publicly to help whatever you may be doing with this invention of yours. Sorry for the crude images, I am no artist - win, loose, or draw - I would win or loose if I had
to choose.
Also, please be aware that I intended to bring it to you for final approval with full veto power, and with a request for any advice you may have thought appropriate. I
only worked quietly without you, to demonstrate real work and comprehensive thinking; enough to allow you to respect our efforts.
Respectfully,
nZo
42

GGM3 A1 HB

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

GGM3 A1 HB

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

GGM2 - Proto-type Design - with recursive wiring & electret

GGM1 - Block Diagram

GGM2 - Proto-type Design - recursive wiring & electret

Using two ‘virtual stator bars’ allows for

This allows easy speed control and a

This basic test (proto-type) platform

Optional Virtual Stator-Bars

Diagrams: showing optional virtual stator bar arms

Recursive Coil Wiring with Electret as diode

GGM2 - Document Group Development

GGM1 & GGM2 Goals

The goal is: Simple & Safe

GGM2 R&D Objectives

1. Primary Design Specification: d. Create Rotor Tube

2. Primary Design Prototype: 4. Publish Design

6. Are we designing such a situation as this quote:

Magnet positioning is likely more able to control speed.

GGM1 & GGM2 Potential

1) It is obviously a potential high torsion device,

This seems a bit counter-intuitive – exactly as the Tesla Switch does.

Questions, design requirements

2. Stator shell construction with fiberglass and two part epoxy –

6. How many coils SC RC

I Have No Wish to Copy Bedini

7. Size, shape, How many PM – SPM RPM

10. Flywheel size, type

Both EM magnets at center – both PM are N facing center.

George says air core, round is best – I believe (will check.

Enhance questions page

Modularized R&D Tests Required

1. Coils: can we improvise off the shelf automobile coils

2. Coils : must we custom create our coils

Prime Numbers Wiring Test: 1, 2, 3, 5, (7) = 18 (29) levels total

1. one spiral -litz – primary also

3. RSW: What must our coils have in circuit to work?

Can electret serve as a diode capacitor?

Series Parrell With step-down transformer

RSW: Wired in Series

RSW: Wired in Parallel

RSW: Wiring w Step-down transformer Option

: How can we make a VHF pulse

I suspect the discharge will also fluctuate the Trigger coil,

"The ratio of secondary to primary turns in an ignition coil is

As a backup system I am also designing a long life, stable,

Vince – Notes – comments & observations

Questions I need answers to still:

I see more here than I so far can appreciate.

Letter to Marc P – Marc P response

GGM1 - project was going very well until yesterday:

Electret Answers - Marc P

GMM1A.5a.doc comments - Marc P

Autotransformer - Operating principles

An ignition coil is essentially an autotransformer with a high ratio of

The ratio of secondary to primary turns in an ignition coil is somewhere

actually cause a spark.

Where V is voltage, L is inductance (in henrys) and dI is the rate

A less theoretical way of looking at it is that disconnecting the current

Transformer with multiple secondaries, provides multiple output voltages.

A single tapped secondary provides multiple voltages.

A tapped secondary using a switch to select one of many possible voltages.

A sliding contact on the secondary continuously varies the secondary voltage.

Ordinary transformer wired as an autotransformer to boost the line voltage.

Ordinary transformer wired as an autotransformer to buck the line voltage down.