You are on page 1of 6

A Two Stage and Three Stage CMOS OPAMP with Fast Settling, High DC Gain and Low Power

Designed in 180nm Technology


Anshu Gupta
Electronic and Instrumentation Deptt. SGSITS, Indore Indore, India E-mail:anshu05.gupta@gmail.com

D.K. Mishra, R. Khatri


Electronic and Instrumentation Deptt. SGSITS, Indore Indore, India E-mail: dmishra@sgsits.ac.in, rkhatri@sgsits.ac.in

U.B.S. Chandrawat
SVCE, Indore Email-id: uday22bana@yahoo.co.in

Preet Jain
SVITS, Indore

AbstractTwo Stage Opamp : An analog to digital converter (ADC) uses switched capacitor stages that settle in two steps. The first step of settling places charge onto the load capacitance using charge pumps, and the second fulfills the settling requirements using negative feedback. The key factor is to establish the optimum combination of gm2/gm1 & Cl/Cc. So, required accuracy & settling time can be established with minimum power consumption. An experimental prototype fabricated in a 0.18um CMOS UMC tech. using cadence requires power consumption of 50 W for Cload=5pf. Typical measured results are 75 dB gain, UGB of 16 MHz, 80ns settling time, PM 60 deg, SR is +6/-6V/us, CMRR is 90dB .The chip active area is about 45 m X 35 m. Three stage CMOS opamp: The three stage CMOS opamp with NMC technique is also designed. Simulated results are DC Gain of 90dB, Unity Gain frequency 30MHz, Power consumption 300 W, Settling Time 150 ns with Cload 1pf. In this paper a novel time domain design methodology for three stage NMC amplifiers was proposed. Keywords- Fast settling; High gainbandwidth; low voltage; multi-stage amplifier; frequency compensation; power consumption.

I. INTRODUCTION The rapid increase in chip complexity which has occurred over the past few years has created the need to implement complete analog-digital subsystems on the same integrated circuit using the same technology. For this reason implementation of analog functions in MOS technology has become increasingly important, and great strides have been made in recent years in implementing functions such as highspeed DACs ,sampled data analog filters, voltage references, instrumentation amplifiers, and so forth in CMOS technology. The Two-stage CMOS opamp design procedure suitable for pencil and paper analysis is given by Palmisano, Palumbo and Pennisi (2001).This procedure is allowed to use the limited range of compensation capacitor (Cc>>Cgs6). Here Cc is the compensation capacitor and Cgs6 parasitic capacitor of MOSFET in opamp second stage. Mahattanakul and Chutichatuporn (2005) have

improved the design procedure that allows a wider range of Cc which provides a higher degree of freedom in the trade off between noise and power consumption. Design procedure for programmable opamp is reported in literature with noise power balancing (Bronskowski and Schroeder 2007). Pugliese, Cappuccino and Cocurullo (2008) proposed a design procedure for settling time minimization in multistage opamps with low power high accuracy. Design procedures reported in literature have not given much attention to settling time parameter of opamp. In this work for the given constraints of speed, power, noise and load, relationship between Cc and Cgs6 has been established. Relationship between Cc and Cgs6 has been used to find out optimum way of implementing the miller compensation. Two stages refer to the number of gain stages in the opamp. The first gain stage is a differential input single ended output stage. The second gain stage is normally a common source gain stage that has an active load. Since opamps are designed to be operated with negative-feedback connection, frequency compensation is necessary for closed loop stability. The simplest frequency compensation technique employs the miller effect by connecting a compensation capacitor Cc across the highgain stage.

Fig 1. Block diagram two stage CMOS opamp

Opamp consists of one or more differential stages and usually followed by additional gain stages depending upon the requirements. The paper consists of understanding of specifications and circuit topology of opamp. Design

978-1-4244-7818-7/10/$26.00 c 2010 IEEE

448

procedures along with one example of opamp design using UMC 0.18 um technology with single bias supply 1.8V is also given. Amplifier slew-rate limiting can impose an additional lower bound on the power consumption of switched capacitor circuits. The proper choice of circuit topology can improve the ratio of load to static currents for an opamp. The load capacitance cannot decrease due to thermal (kT/C) noise restrictions, and reducing the output voltage swing by a fraction, results in an increase in load capacitance by to maintain the same kT/C noise performance. The proposed opamp maximizes this ratio by sourcing and sinking arbitrarily large load currents while using minimal or zero static current. Three stage CMOS opamp: This paper presents a new time domain design procedure for CMOS three stage amplifiers with nested miller compensation. A conventional three stage amplifier consists of three transconductance stages gm1-gm3. Multistage amplifiers are widely used in the analog and mixed signal circuits to achieve high dc gain and large output signal swing simultaneously. Therefore, a frequency compensation technique is needed to design stable three-stage amplifiers. Nested Miller compensation (NMC) is one of the well known techniques which are suitable for three stage amplifiers. In this technique, two Cc are used. The first capacitor is connected between the first and third stages and the other capacitor is connected between the second and third stages. The concept of this technique is the pole splitting. So, a higher phase margin is achieved, however, this solution results in the bandwidth and SR reduction.

The schematic diagram of two stage CMOS opamp is shown in fig 3. It comprised differential gain stage, second gain stage and bias string. Examining the subsections further will provide valuable insight into the operation of this circuit. Biasing string: Biasing circuit is made up of M5, M8, M10 and M11 transistors of P-type. It is used to provide reference voltage to the differential amplifier. The biasing

Fig 3. Schematic diagram of two stage CMOS opamp

Fig 2: Structure of the three-stage NMC amplifier

The trend of low-voltage design is an unjustified fact in today's circuit design world, and the demand of low voltage cascade amplifiers in analog systems is increasing. As will be shown in the paper, in low power CMOS design, the stability of the NMC amplifier is deteriorated by a right half- plane (RHP) zero. Moreover, as an amplifier with three gain stages can generally provide sufficient DC voltage gain (-90dB) with a good compromise on the power consumption, the discussion in this paper is focused on three-stage NMC amplifiers. The gain bandwidth product (GBW) is reduced when an additional gain stage is added. As will be shown in this paper, the published stability criteria are not suitable for low-power CMOS design. The phase margin (PM), slew rate (SR), settling time (Ts) and power supply rejection ratio (PSRR) are not optimized for low-power applications. II. CIRCUIT CONFIGURATION

of the operational amplifier is achieved with only four transistors. Transistors M5 and M8 form a simple current mirror bias string that supplies a voltage between the gate and source of M5 and M6. Transistors M5 and M6 source a certain amount of current based difference of the two input signals at the output. It comprises M1, M2 transistors of Ptype. Current mirror is used to provide constant current to the branches of differential amplifier. Common source amplifier: The purpose of the second gain stage, as the name implies, is to provide additional gain in the amplifier. Consisting of transistors M6 and M7, this stage takes on their gate to source voltage which is controlled by the bias string. M10 and M11 are diode connected to ensure they operate in the saturation region. Differential gain stage: Source coupled pair form the differential amplifier which gives the output from the drain of M2 and amplifies it through M6 which is in the standard common source configuration. Compensation circuit: It comprises NMOS transistor M9 and compensation capacitor Cc, used to ensure the stability of the two stage CMOS operational amplifier. III. DESIGN TECHNIQUES The first aspect considered in the design was the specifications to be met. Based on a clear understanding of the specs, the circuit topology of the standard CMOS operational amplifier was chosen.
TABLE 1. SPECIFICATION OF THE TWO-STAGE

parameters Supply voltages Unity gain bandwidth Power consumption Settling time(ns)

Results achieved +1.8V/-1.8V 16 MHz 50w 70ns

2010 International Conference on Computer Information Systems and Industrial Management Applications (CISIM)

449

Gain(dB) Phase margin Slew Rate CMRR Dynamic input range Load capacitance

75dB 60 deg +6/6 V/s 90 dB +1/1 V 5pF

Step11: Current through first and second stage can be found out by using basic opamp equation Step12: Driving voltage of M5 transistor can be calculated by using the relationship Common set so will be in deep saturation. Step13: Aspect ratio for Transistors can be found out from the design steps B. Summary of proposed design steps. Step1:

A .Procedure The schematic of the opamp is given in fig. 3. We adopted a common procedure to design the opamp. On the basis of above analysis and discussion design steps for two stage opamp can be given as: Step1: As per the discussions in value of driving voltage ( is to be set. Step2: For the given constraints of settling time and accuracy, required SR and u can be found out by using equations

Step2:

Common set saturation

so

will be in deep

Step3

Step3: Constraint of noise sets the value of equation Step4: By using equation calculate compensation Capacitor the

from Step4: value of Step5:

Step5: Output swing requirement will set the upper limit as per the for the driving voltage of second stage ( can be set up at a value as high as discussions, possible. Step6: For the given constraint of power consumption calculate the transconductance of second stage from equation Step7: Calculate from equation

Step6:

Step7:

Step8: Step8: either On the basis of calculated value of relationship can Step9:

or be used to calculate compensation resistance. Step9: Compatibility of the given capacitive load with derived circuit parameters can be verified. Step10: By using calculated values of and transistors ( aspect ratio can be found out by using basic opamp relationship

TABLE 2.

SPECIFICATION OF THE THREE-STAGE

parameters

Results to be achieved

450

2010 International Conference on Computer Information Systems and Industrial Management Applications (CISIM)

Supply voltages Unity gain bandwidth Power consumption Settling time(ns) Gain(dB) Phase margin SR CMRR Load capacitance Dynamic Input Range

+1.8V/-1.8V 33 MHz 300 w 150 ns 90 dB 55 deg +25/-25 V/s 110 dB 10pF 1/-1V Applying these equations the position of the non-dominated complex pole pair P2, 3 are given by

IV. NESTED MILLER COMPENSATION In this section CMOS design will be illustrated by a threestage NMC amplifier. The gain stages are having voltage gain Av (1-3). The capacitors Cm1 and Cm2 are the compensation capacitors, and CL is the loading capacitor. A circuit diagram realizing the NMC amplifier is depicted in Fig. 4.

The above stability criteria are based on the assumption that gm3 is much larger than gm1 and gm2. Nevertheless, gm3 is comparable to gm1 and gm2 in low power CMOS amplifiers, and the stability criteria stated are no longer valid. Moreover, as gm3 is not large, the zeros cannot be neglected. From the numerator a RHP zero and a left half

Fig 4. Circuit diagram of the three-stage NMC Amplifier

The first, second and third gain stage are implemented by M101-MI09, M201- M204 and M301-M302, respectively. For the structure of the NMC amplifier, by solving the circuit network without losing accuracy, the small-signal voltage gain transfer function as -half-plane (LHP) zero are present. Since the s term is negative, the RHP zero locates at a lower frequency than the LHP zero and the effect of the RHP zero dominates. The phase margin is decreased by the RHP zero and the stability of the NMC amplifier is reduced. The slew rate of the NMC amplifier is given by is calculated
Fig 5. Schematic diagram of three stage CMOS opamp

Where is the DC gain of the amplifier, and I s the5 dominated pole; and are the transconductance and output resistance of the gain stages, respectively. From (I), it shows that there are three poles and two zeros. If the amplifier has High output current capability, gm3 is large and the zeros which are located at high frequencies can be neglected. The Stability of the amplifier have third order Butter-worth frequency response in unity-feedback configuration. The gain-bandwidth product and phase margin are therefore given by

Where Im1, Im2, Im3 are the maximum current of the first, second and third gain stage to charge the capacitors. The slew rate of the amplifier is poor as the values of the compensation capacitors used in NMC are large, and it takes a long time to charge or discharge them to the desired voltage. Since the settling time of the amplifier consists of the slewing and quasi-linear period, the Settling behavior of the NMC amplifier is also degraded.

2010 International Conference on Computer Information Systems and Industrial Management Applications (CISIM)

451

. V. SIMULATION RESULTS
The simulation results show that this op-amp performed to within specs for all the specified parameters. For the process p/m shown in table3,design p/m of opamp in table 4 and simulation results in table 5 are designed from the proposed procedure for Cc=0.4pf
TABLE 3. PROCESS PARAMETER OF 0.18 m Figure 6.AC response of two stage opamp

Process parameters (cm2/v.s) Tox (m) Vt (V)


TABLE 4.

NMOS 3.141 X 102 4.2 X 10-9 3.075 X 10-1

PMOS 1.145 X 102 4.2 X 10-9 -4.55 X 10-1


Figure 7. Settling time of two stage opamp

DESIGN PARAMETER OF TWO STAGE CMOS OPAMP

Aspect ratio Cc (W/L)1,2 (W/L)3,4 (W/L)5,8 (W/L)6 (W/L)7 (W/L)9 (W/L)10,11

Proposed 0.4 (1.08/0.36) (0.27/0.54) (0.36/0.36) (3.7/0.36) (3.9/0.54) (0.24/3.33) (0.32/0.54)

Unit Pf m/ m m/ m m/ m m/ m m/ m m/ m m/ m

Figure 8. Input noise response of two stage opamp

TABLE 5. SIMULATION RESULT OF TWO STAGES

parameters Layout area(m^2) Supply voltages Unity gain bandwidth Power consumption Settling time(ns) Gain(dB) Phase margin 3-db bandwidth SR dynamic input range Load capacitance CMRR

Results achieved 45 m X 35 m +1.8V/-1.8V 15.77 MHz 32.53 w 96.57 ns 70.98 dB 58 deg 5.41KHz +5.53/-8.17 V/s +1/-1 V 5pF 81.09dB

Figure 9. Output noise response of two stage opamp

Figure 10. Offset voltages of two stage opamp

Figure 11.Frequency responses of the three stage opamp using NMC

452

2010 International Conference on Computer Information Systems and Industrial Management Applications (CISIM)

VI. LAYOUT In Cadence tool we used virtuoso Layout Editor. It is also important to Extracted netlist underlying the layout view, for two main purposes of the circuit. The layout area of this two stage opamp die is 45 m X 35 m and layout area of three stage is 65 m X 65 m.
Figure 12. Common mode gain of 3 stage opamp TABLE 6. SIMULATION RESULT OF TWO STAGE

VII. CONCLUSION In this paper, we have presented the design of a fast settling, low power OPAMP with a high DC gain. The fast settling of the two stage CMOS opamp with DC gain of 70.98 dB, Ts is 96.57 ns, UGB is 15.77 MHz with Cload of 5pf. Simulation shows a power consumption of 32.53 W, layout has been also made with die area of 45 m X 35 m. A novel frequency compensation technique NMC which eliminates the RHP zero in an NMC amplifier has been presented and proved by experimental results after simulation results DC Gain of 81.32dB, Unity Gain frequency 30.19MHz, Power consumption 272.7 W, Settling Time 166.4 ns with Cload 1pf. In this paper a novel time domain design methodology for three stage NMC amplifiers was proposed. In future we can develop new current mirrors and third stage of opamp so limitations of given procedure can be overcome. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT This work has been carried out in SMDP VLSI laboratory of the Electronics and Instrumentation department of Shri G. S. Institute of Technology and Science, Indore, India. The author is thankful to the ministry for facilities provided and also thankful to Dr. D. K. Mishra for guiding me. REFERENCES
[1] Jirayuth Mahattanakul and Jamorn ChutichatupornDesign Procedurefor Two-Stage CMOS OPAMP With Noise Power Balancing SchemeIEEE transaction on circuits and systems-I:Regular Paper,Vol. 52,No.8,August 2005,pp. 1508-1514. [2] D.K.Mishra & U.B.S.Chandrawat. Fast settling opamp with low power consumption.Inter.J.Elect.,Taylor& Francis.94.pp.683698,2007. [3] D.K.Mishra & U.B.S.Chandrawat. Design procedure for two stage CMOS opamp with optimum balancing of speed power & noise. Inter. J. Elect, Taylor & Francis.Vol.00,No.0 month 2009,1- 15. [4] H. Yang and D. Allstot,Considerations for fast settling operational amplifiers, IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst., vol. 37, pp. 326334, Mar. 1990. [5] P. Allen and D. Holberg, CMOS Analog Circuit Design. New York: Holt Rinehart and Winston, 1987. [6] P. Gray and R. Meyer, Analysis and Design of Analog Integrate d Circuits, 3rd ed. New York: Wiley, 1993. 11 [7] G. Palmisano and G. Palumbo, A novel representation for two poles feedback amplifiers, IEEE Trans. Educ., vol. 41, pp. 216218, Aug.1998. [8] G. Palmisano and G. Palumbo, An optimized compensation strategy for two stage CMOS OP AMPS, IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. I, vol. 42,pp. 178182, Mar. 1995. [9] Y. Kamath, R. Meyer, and P. Gray, Relationship between Frequency response and settling time of operational amplifier, IEEE J. Solid- State Circuits, vol. SC-9, pp. 347352, Dec. 1974. [10] P. Gray and R. Meyer, Recent advances in monolithic operational amplifier design, IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst, vol. CAS-21, pp. 317 327.

parameters Layout area(m^2) Supply voltages Unity gain bandwidth Power consumption Settling time(ns) Gain(dB) Phase margin 3-db bandwidth SR dynamic input range Load capacitance CMRR Input referred noise

Results achieved 65 m X 65 m +1.8V/-1.8V 30.19 MHz 272.79 w 166.4 ns 81.32 dB 50.68 deg 5.41KHz +20.4/-28.54 V/s +1/-1 V 1pF 100.42dB 20 nV/Hz

Figure 13. .Layout of two stage CMOS opamp

Figure 14. av extracted view of two stage opamp

Figure 15. Layout of three stage opamp

2010 International Conference on Computer Information Systems and Industrial Management Applications (CISIM)

453

You might also like