Dishonest Service Fraud With Obstruction of Justice in the US District Court of Massachusetts! Rule of Law & the Constitution Mean Nothing to the Staff of This Court!! Collusion and Conspiracy to Violate Rights! Names Named!

UNAUTHORIZED ATTORNEYS COLLUDE WITH COURT STAFF AND RUN A PRETENSE LITIGATION GHOST WRITING FOR THE COURTOBSTRUCTION
OF JUSTICE-CONSPIRACY TO VIOLATE RIGHTS-COURT FILES SWITCHED IN THE ELECTRONIC FILING SYSTEM-CORRUPT CIRCUIT EXECTIVE OFFICE-CLERK OF COURT HAS US MARSHAL THREATEN PLAINTIFF WITH CRIMINAL CHARGES AFTER THEY ARE CAUGHT AND MUCH MUCH MORE!! Links to the evidence which is the court record itself. Our justice system is a fraud!! Be sure you click on info & rating & read the side bar comments for the full story!!
UNAUTHORIZED ATTORNEYS COLLUDE WITH COURT STAFF AND RUN A PRETENSE LITIGATION GHOST WRITING FOR THE COURTOBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE-CONSPIRACY TO VIOLATE RIGHTS-COURT FILES SWITCHED IN THE ELECTRONIC FILING SYSTEM-CORRUPT CIRCUIT EXECTIVE OFFICE-CLERK OF COURT HAS US MARSHAL THREATEN PLAINTIFF WITH CRIMINAL CHARGES AFTER THEY ARE CAUGHT AND MUCH MUCH MORE!! Links to the evidence which is the court record itself. Our justice system is a fraud!! Be sure you click on info & rating & read the side bar comments for the full story!!
Plaintiff notes that default judgment decisions and reconsideration decisions do not usually linger in this court. The alleged corrupt court staff are either blocking these motions from Judge OToole or Judge OToole is among the corrupt!!!
US DISTRICT COURT OF MASSACHUSETTS CM/ECF FILING. ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES N. Orders and Judgments 1. The assigned judge, chambers staff or deputy clerk shall electronically file all signed orders. Any order signed electronically has the same force and effect as if the judge had affixed his/her signature to a paper copy of the order and it had been entered on the docket conventionally. 2. When mailing paper copies of an electronically filed order to a party who is not a registered participant in ECF, the clerks office will include the NEF to provide the non-participant with proof of the filing.
3. A judge, or deputy clerk, if appropriate, may grant routine orders by a text-only entry upon the docket entitled Electronic Order. In such cases, no PDF document will issue; the text-only entry shall constitute the court's only order on the matter and counsel will receive a system generated NEF. NO WHERE DOES IT STATE THAT THE DOCKET CLERK MAY ENTER ELECTRONIC ORDERS; WHY IS THE DOCKET CLERK SIGNING DOCUMENTS WHERE THE SIGNATURE BLOCK CALLS FOR THE SIGNATURE OF A DEPUTY CLERK SUCH AS ON SUMMONSES AND ORDERS OF DISMISSAL. See page 142 of Joseph Zerniks file. NEWS FLASH TO THE FEDERAL COURT SYSTEM [/s/ Judge Whoever] is typed onto the documents; it is in no way, state or fashion an electronic signature and any corrupt court staff who has access to the court computers can type a Judges name and then enter the document which renders it filed.
On June 30, 2000, President Clinton signed into law the Electronic Records and Signatures in Commerce Act (or Electronic Signatures Act). The president signed the act both electronically and using the more traditional pen-and-ink.
The user login and password required to submit documents to the electronic filing system serve as the ECF Filers signature on all electronic documents filed with the court; therefore, it is virtually impossible to consider documents entered into the system by the staff of the court to legally validate that the TYPED NAME ON THE DOCMENT is the electronic signature of a judge. Each and every document filed by the staff of the court is a forgery if it does not have their name as the typed signature. The NEF simply represents that the document was filed by court staff; it does not represent that the signature was by an actual judge. Further by the courts OWN POLICY there is not one valid document in this case. They have all been created, forged, entered and filed by the alleged corrupt staff of this court.
US DISTRICT COURT OF MASSACHUSETTS
Job Description for a Docket Clerk Careerbuilder 12/17/2010 Representative Duties The Docket Clerk is assigned to a busy session of a District Judge and is responsible for the Judges case dockets: enters/reviews/identifies/researches/ensures the accuracy, timeliness, and quality of data entered into the Case Management/Electronic Case Files (CM/ECF) database; prepares/analyzes various case management reports; scans and converts documents into image files; creates/reviews/ensures the accuracy of entries on the docket, documents and proceedings; ensures entries are appropriately linked and that the image matches the docketed event; assists customers with electronic case filing inquiries; tests new procedures and processes to provide necessary feedback; audits cases for closing and checks the docket to ensure all necessary documents are entered and deadlines are met; prepares notification of deficiencies regarding documents; processes orders in a timely manner; addresses inquiries regarding case information; generates notices related to case events; manages and maintains case records; and performs other duties as assigned.
Minimum and Preferred Qualifications High school graduation or equivalent. College degree preferred. Commitment to public service is essential. One year or more of specialized experienced, which is defined as progressively responsible clerical or administrative experience requiring the regular and recurring application of clerical or administrative procedures that demonstrates the candidate has the ability to apply a body of rules, regulations, directives, or laws and involves the routine use of specialized terminology and automated software and equipment for word processing, data entry or report generation. The incumbent should have strong verbal and written communication skills and the ability to effectively analyze work processes. Skill in the use of automation systems, including knowledge and proficiency in Microsoft Office software is essential. Knowledge of WordPerfect and CM/ECF is preferred. Applicants must be U.S. citizens or meet the exceptions to the statutory restrictions on hiring non-citizens to work in the federal government in the continental United States. Ivy Racket in the US District Court, Massachusetts, Deprives Disabled Nurse of Her Rights through Simulated Litigation http://t.co/fzzHglA Joseph Zernik PhD who is a human rights activist has taken on the cause of Americans oppression and violation of Constitutional Rights by our corrupt courts. He determined this case, as a whole, to be simulated litigation see pictures of the corrupt lawyers (PAGES 236 & 238) in his READ. Be sure to see the following pages included in the link from Americas Doc!!! PAGE 144 The file by Dr. Zernik also has multiple docket entries and the Full Docket Activity Report up to the dismissal with prejudice. [pay attention to Dkt. #20 & #53 where it clearly shows the manipulation of the file date by the corrupt Pro Se Staff Attorney (PSSA, 4) her name is Barbara Morse or Barbara Billig Morse. A few years back her husband tried to run against the corrupt Barney Frank and only received 149 votes in the primary so he withdrew from the racein my opinion if you can only get 149 votes in a run against the corrupt Barney Frank your corrupt activities must trump the corrupt activities of Frank. (Is that actually possible??)] [See the docket text @ Dkt. # 29 and Dkt. #34 where the corrupt docket clerk, Chris Danieli, entered the case for absolutely no valid reason to assist the corrupt attorneys switch their bogus scanned files with word process files four days after the Plaintiff filed for sanctions.] (See the text of Dkt. #58 where a disabled pro se Plaintiff is literally begging for her constitutional rights in a US District court] [See the 1/31/2011 docket text entry where the corrupt docket clerk slides in Plaintiffs motion for contempt so that it will receive no legitimate adjudication or due process as he without legitimate authority references the case to the corrupt Magistrate based on the bogus orders by Barbara Morse in Dkt. #57] [See the docket text entries of 3/2/2011 and 3/3/2011 where the corrupt Magistrate without legislative authority or legitimate jurisdiction denies the Plaintiffs motion for judicial reassignment including reassignment of the US District Judge and her motion to vacate void orders as he maneuvers to
continue blocking the case from the US District Judge by terminating the motions] [See Dkt. #77 where the Plaintiffs discovery request are strickenthis is after her motion to stay the discovery request was denied (see page 96) until the reassignment and vacate void orders motions were ruled on by a US District Judge along with the fact that the Plaintiff needed additional time because she was exhausted from four days of continuous conferences with medical professionals because her son was extremely ill and hospitalized] [note how Defendants motion for contempt is promptly answeredfiled 3/4/2011 Dkt. #71 recommended allowed Dkt. #80 3/23/2011 and how all motions by this Plaintiff usually are left to linger take notice that this time the contempt motion reply is a report and recommendation and not an order as in Dkt. #61]. PAGE 33 has the bogus answer for the Defendants by the unauthorized Defense attorneys that is full of denials, not enough information, or false statements to a 41 page complaint that was supported by 47 exhibits and the ANSWER would have been tossed out immediately by any honest court. The ruse is initiated because there is evidence that the EEOC was paid off which is supported by the fact that not one submission to the EEOC supported the Defendants position. Also one of the Defendants bought a house for $630,000 and she took only a $260,000 mortgage just days before Patrick Egan, a Jackson Lewis attorney, HAND DELIVERED THEIR POSITION STATEMENT TO THE EEOC; the house remained vacant. Defendants also submitted the file of a non-practicing nurse that worked in their human resource department instead of the file of the actual nurse they hired. Having engaged in alleged federal crime along with their corrupt attorneys the defendants continue with representation by these alleged corrupt attorneys and the alleged corrupt attorneys arranged to continue collecting fees from the Defendants by sending the Plaintiff an antagonistic letter that would ensure she filed suit. RICO to the max!!! PAGE 58 -- See Pro Se Staff Attorney Barbara Morse in action as she wipes out the Plaintiffs prosecution of her case in Dkt. #53 where she colludes with the corrupt attorneys by ignoring fact, rule and law and signs a US District Judges name; she wrote this memorandum and order after she read the injunctive relief motion that requested she be removed from the case on January 20, 2011 and manipulated the filing date on the docket back to January 19th. PAGE 100 See Plaintiffs objection (Dkt. # 81) to the Magistrates report and recommendation (Dkt. #80) where allowing the Defendants Motion for Contempt is recommended; no facts are stated and the recommendation simply replays previous bogus memorandum from the court. Note page 9 the last sentence The violation by Defense Counsel of the Courts local rules was ignored which started with RULE 83.5.2 APPEARANCES. This Document was second in the list of Primary exhibits to support the Extraordinary Writ. Plaintiffs opposition (Dkt. # 78) to Defendants contempt motion is available on PACER I have not had a chance to get it on Scribd as of yet. Clearly the Constitution means nothing to a corrupt court. You will also
note that in the caption Judicial Notice was requested which was ignored. There was nothing in the FRCP or the local rules regarding Judicial Notice or any requirement for filing the same. Some courts allow it to be as a motion; the Plaintiff subsequently discovered that Judicial Notice was under notices in the ECF system. It is the docket clerks job to inform the filer if they took a misstep with their filing never were any notices sent by the Docket Clerk indicating a deficient filing by the Plaintiff; one would assume that a honest judge would be more than aware that the Judicial Notice requested by the Plaintiff was so he would take notice of the documented established court rules and FRCP as well as established law and authority along with the gee is that really your signature on all the bogus documents by Morse. PAGE 190 See Plaintiffs letter to Chief Judge Wolf of this Corrupt Court which was also sent to Judge OToole through the electronic filing system. Pages 195 217 of the letter are excerpts from Dkt. #51 & #52 Plaintiffs motions to rid her action of corrupt attorneys --#51 addresses the corrupt Pro Se Staff Attorney and #52 addresses the corrupt defense attorneys who have no business filing in this action. THEY DID NOT MAKE AN APPEARANCE OR ANY STATEMENT THAT INDICATES THEY REPRESENT THE DEFENDANTS AND ENGAGED CORRUPT COURT STAFF TO HELP THEM ACHIEVE PRETENSE LITIGATION. PAGE 133 See the bogus order (Dkt. # 86) that was scanned from the Magistrates computer before entering it into the electronic filing system where he signed with a the name of a US District Judge dismissing the complaint with prejudice. The alleged corrupt court staff and unauthorized attorneys are more than aware that the Plaintiff checks the properties of the PDFs that come from this court which clearly indicate if the file originated from the computer of a US District Judge. At tired_of_corruption on SCRIBD you can find other court documents from this case which support the fact that this is pretense litigation in a very corrupt court known as the US District Court of Massachusetts or just link to them directly at the given links below. There is also a Day Planner for the FBI who thus far have shown absolutely no sign that they are interested in stopping these criminals, who are the back bone of our judiciary branch, from oppressing and freely violating the Constitutional Rights of the American people. http://t.co/XcFWbmC The DOJ, State Attorney Generals office, Suffolk County DA office and the ACLU, also, seem to be disinterested. The criminal duty officer at the States AG office informed the Plaintiff several times, as she tried to report the scope of the crime, that he needed to end the call because he had other calls he needed to take; he didnt even ask for the case number. The DOJ put the Plaintiff on hold and never came back. Suffolk County DA office stated they did not handle this type of crime. Maybe the local police will act!! Certainly there are police officers who have been admonished by the court for violating rights so they may have an interest; here is an example
from the alleged corrupt Judge Sorokin http://goo.gl/rJjjz where per the Boston Globe Sarah Wunsch, staff attorney with the American Civil Liberties Union of Massachusetts, said Sorokins decision is a reminder to police officers that even if they are dealing with an irate person, he or she is still protected by the Constitution. Susan Corcoran, an attorney from the Massachusetts ACLU, essentially stated the Plaintiffs description of the corruption in this court was too large of a problem and beyond any intervention that the ACLU could take which makes the ACLU a worthless entity. Have you ever seen such a load of hypocrisy at so many levels? During the EEOC investigation, or lack thereof, the OIG was notified three times and each time sent their form email back declining to act. The EEOC trio that needs a serious look is Investigator Linda Ingle, Director Robert Sanders and the incompetent v. purposeful dereliction of duty Kenneth An. Robert Unitas their supervisor from Washington DC was repeatedly told the investigation was a farce and he did nothing!!! Terry from the white collar crimes unit over at the DOJ was sent multiple documents regarding the EEOC farce; she took no action. http://www.scribd.com/tired_of_corruption all documents http://goo.gl/Q36ug this will take you to Plaintiffs intent to file mandamus which was entered into the ECF as a notice and the language of the Mandamus was sent to a process server who was to put it in Judge OTooles hand but it was accepted on his behalf by Dianne Croke his assistant. It describes the set up for pretense litigation. Because the case was referenced to the Magistrate at this time the Plaintiff believes the Mandamus was never seen by Judge OToole; it never received a response. http://t.co/C9flSo3 Dkt. #57 This shows Barbara Morse trying to create a replica of Judge OTooles style as she attempted with Dkt. #53 but Dkt. #53 had her name as the author in the properties. The unauthorized attorneys were aware that the Plaintiff knew Morse created, entered and filed Dkt. #53 because she emailed them and told them not to get too excited about the ruling that lacked fact, rule and law. They again colluded with Morse so she switched computers for this document and tried again; a more than strong appearance that the unauthorized attorneys are ghost writing for the court is evident in this document. The unauthorized reference to the Magistrate and orders prohibiting the Plaintiff from making reference to the docket were in this bogus document. http://t.co/1fVkdkq Link to the names of the Boston Bar Association Ethics Committee -STAR MEMBER-- the alleged corrupt US District Court of Massachusetts pro se staff attorney Barbara Morse. Whether received or not the Plaintiff is unable to verify but they were emailed the same letter that was addressed to Chief Judge Wolf. No one took a stance. The Boston Globe and the Boston Herald also ignored communications regarding this corruption.
http://goo.gl/moluM Dkt. #61 Magistrate Judge Sorokin without legislative authority is the undersigned on memorandum and orders that denied the Plaintiffs MOTION FOR CONTEMPT against the Pro Se Staff Attorney and Defense Counsel for Collusion (the Pro Se Staff Attorney actually wrote the ruling then engaged the Magistrate who was more than willing to violate the Plaintiffs rights in order to cover for the Pro Se Staff Attorney and the Corrupt Defense Attorneys). As Bill Windsor of Lawless America so eloquently said, Corrupt Judges are just lawyers in Black Dresses and they protect their own over any obligation to the Constitution. Highly recommended http://lawlessamerica.com/index.php Be sure to read the side bar comments on the SCRIBD READ these Jackson Lewis attorneys, Guy Tully and Brian Childs really are a piece of worktheir M.O. is deception, misrepresentation and outright fraud!! Clearly Morse and the unauthorized attorneys do not know law or the bogus document would have been a report and recommendation.
Magistrate Judge Sorokin US District Judge OToole is is alleged corrupt !! either corrupt or clueless in regards to the corrupt court staff !! http://t.co/aWrDr7j See picture of Judge OToole toasting the Constitution at a celebratory party with the Massachusetts elite. Do only the elite have Constitutional Rights in this country? http://t.co/bErlN7r The Plaintiff was present in Massachusetts because her father had died. This is a 25 page Extraordinary Writ requesting that the US Court of Appeals order the US District Court to schedule the Plaintiff a hearing before a US District Judge. It was strongly supported by US Supreme Court Law as well as authority from the First Circuit Appeals Court; the order signed by the Magistrate, where he had no legislative authority to write orders, was attached (Dkt. #61). The fact that the Magistrate restricted the Plaintiffs filing with the court and then denied her the right to file so she could appeal his orders to the US District Judge was included. The fact that the reference to the Magistrate was written by the Pro Staff Attorney as she ruled on Plaintiffs Motion that requested she be barred from working on the case with evidence of collusion with the Defense Counsel and then signed the US District Judges name which triggered the aforementioned Contempt Motion was well documented. The fact that there was absolutely no consent to the jurisdiction of the Magistrate was included. The opinion docket from the US District Court did not have any of the four memorandums & orders written by Morse listed; she signed a US District Judges name to these bogus documents that lacked rule, law and fact and only addressed sanctions and complaint dismissal. The fact that the RULING by the Pro Se Staff Attorney had orders prohibiting the Plaintiff from making reference to the docket, and how this more than bizarre order violated constitutional rights per Supreme Court
Law, was included. The fact that the aforementioned order was issued because the Plaintiff pointed out docket evidence showing Defense Counsel had court staff assistance in switching files in the electronic filing system was included. A complete pretense litigation supported by evidence and authority was described in the Writ as well as the fact that a Magistrate who had no legal authority over the case was recommending to the US District Judge that the Motion for Contempt by unauthorized attorneys, where none of their filings could be recognize by the court, be allowed and that the Plaintiffs Complaint be dismissed with prejudice. The fact that Plaintiffs objection to this recommendation had been left to linger was included. Plaintiffs objection as well as her opposition to the Defendants Contempt Motion, both, requested a hearing. The Appeals Court Denied the Writ without an opinion and just about one week later the Magistrate Dismissed the case with prejudice and signed the US District Judges name. The US Appeals Court by ignoring the facts and the law essentially extorted a $450.00 filing fee from the disabled Plaintiff; her only income is SSDI and she paid forgoing groceries only because filing in forma pauperis didnt seem to work out too well over at the US District court. The Appeals Court staff knew, just by a glance at the docket, that this was pretense litigation and decided to ensure that the pretense continued in order to protect multiple corrupt court staff including the Clerk of the Court and the Circuit Executive Office staff; the corrupt attorneys are also being protected. One wonders how much money has been spent to keep this case from the view of an actual honest US District or Appeals Court Judge. George Kretas was the case worker over at the US Court of Appeals. He made a modification to the docket on June 15th which added the US District Judges name; he had the Judge in the case listed as Magistrate Judge Sorokin previous to this modification. The alleged corrupt attorney Guy Tully most interestingly did enter an appearance over at the court of Appeals on June 15th. Hmmm! Could George now have extra change in his pocket or did one of the staff attorneys enter the DENIED ruling which came on June 20th. With all the rule and law ignored, three Judges need to no longer sit at this appeals court; they ignored federal crime and further obstructed justice by not ordering the corrupt US District Court of Massachusetts to schedule a hearing for the Plaintiff before a US District Judge and they ignored Supreme Court Law by not vacating the void orders. Their dereliction of duty makes them useless human beings supported by the tax payer; however, the Plaintiff seriously doubts that there was any judicial review of the complaint because no panel of three judges could possibly be so stupid to ignore the amount of law that supported the Writ. http://t.co/zODm9ig This link will take you to the Plaintiffs request for reconsideration regarding the Dismissal with Prejudice, her request for a well deserved default judgment that the court has ignored, and the unauthorized attorneys nerve to file an opposition for the Defendants to, both, the reconsideration and default motions which proves they surely think they are above any law. The most amusing part is where they oppose that the Plaintiff has asked for judicial notice. Yes I am quite sure they are opposed to judicial notice. MORONS!!!! http://t.co/h3NE37y This motion was brought to the court by a process server who was supposed to hand it to Chief Judge Wolf in March. Chief Judge Wolf referred it to Judge OToole in June.
It was filed as ex parte by the Docket Clerk and plays an interesting reappearing and disappearing act even when the filer, who is the Plaintiff, should have access to it on the docket. It clearly stated that it would be filed in the ECF after service to Chief Judge Wolf was verified. It should not have been filed ex parte; its ex parte status ended when Chief Judge Wolf handed it over to Judge OTooles docket clerk. http://goo.gl/ybhC3 This very special link will take you to a rather large file but it is well worth the read. It starts with the bogus order undersigned by Chief Judge Lynch of the US Court of Appeals; this order claims that there was no judicial misconduct and that Barbara Morse has been perfectly appropriate. In other words the federal court system hires people to intentionally violate our rights; they have essentially admitted to the aforementioned with this order. There is a slight problem with the Chief Judges signaturethe slant just does not match her other signatures. See her signatures and compare!!! The 5/18/2011 signature is placed repeatedly for close comparison to the other signatures. As I have previously stated, your judicial misconduct complaints are pending and you will be notified when an order is issued. In response to the concerns raised below, I can assure you that Attorney Morse has acted in full compliance with court practice and procedure in connection with your case. Quote to Plaintiff in an email from Florence Pagano, Circuit Executive Office-Legal Affairs. Today is August 20, 2011. The Judicial Complaint was filed March 7, 2011. The request to challenge the bogus first order was received by the Circuit executive office on June 22, 2011. Frustration with the lack of progress on the processing of this Judicial Misconduct Complaint of which there is overwhelming evidence has been expressed to, both, Susan Goldberg, Deputy Circuit Executive, and Gary H. Wente, Circuit Executive. They do nothing. In fact Mr. Wente did not even bother to return a call to the Plaintiff; she made a call insisting on a decision related to the petition she filed and was very upset having just recently received Defendants latest opposition in which the unauthorized attorneys expressed that the Plaintiff should burden the cost of their latest unauthorized filing. Remember folks your tax dollars pay these tyrants!! Florence Pagano is the attorney over at the Circuit Executive office who worked the draft for the judicial misconduct order; during a recent conversation with Florence she told the Plaintiff that she should just forget the whole thing and move on; the Plaintiff reminded her that the Defendants totally robbed her of her profession and quality of life so Florence thought she should remind the Plaintiff that she still had her children. There are a bunch of emails between Pagano and the Plaintiff; included are the three emails the Plaintiff sent to the Clerk of the Court, Sarah Allison Thornton, where a response was requested. Well the only response that came forth is a certified letter from the US Marshal, Deputy Matthew Dumas, where the Plaintiff was threatened with state and federal criminal harassment charges. Apparently the Clerk of the Court had a problem with all the federal
statutes that were being alleged as violated by her staff; she decided to join the alleged criminal activity by not reporting these violations, further obstructing justice and by making threats of unwarranted criminal charges which is a serious violation of law. Just ask Judge Sorokin about the aforementioned and his well documented knowledge of the law as in Civil Action No. 0911161-LTS which is the case addressed by the ACLU. You absolutely must go to the following link http://dockets.justia.com/docket/massachusetts/madce/1:2009cv11161/123252/ and read Magistrate Judge Sorokins two opinions where he clearly articulates his understanding of the law associated with constitutional rights and 42 U.S.C. 1983; this man is a fraud. Note in the PDF properties (right click on the text of the file) the PDF Version of the files when you look at the files from the link; these PDFs originated with Sorokins computer (Justia typically notes the author as the US District Judge listed in the case). Sarah Allison Thornton should score quite low on her annual evaluation in the section that rates her public relations skills; very hard to believe she is in this position since public relations is a huge part of her job description. The Clerk of the Court is essentially the CEO of the court; the emails she received from the Plaintiff are adequate notice that action against her and her court staff will be coming forth and she verified her receipt of the emails when she engaged the US Marshal. Deputy Dumas was then informed, both, over a Skype call and through email of all the crimes and misdemeanors coming forth from the staff and outside attorneys over the at the federal court house; apparently he and his boss, Jonathan Lemay, decided to agree with the alleged criminals over at the court house and informed the Plaintiff that everything was on the up and up. I guess the documented court record doesnt count as evidence when the alleged criminals work at the court or are attorneys standing bar at the court. Deputy Dumas starts at PAGE 70 Plaintiffs Judicial Complaint which she swears to under the pangs of perjury starts at PAGE 47
Petition to the judicial council for review of the evidence follows: The judicial misconduct complaint decision continues to linger in spite of the fact that Plaintiff requested that it be expedited; this Plaintiff needs relief from continuous abuse of power and the unrelenting anxiety it is causing. It appears they are hoping the Plaintiff will just go away or die.
To Gary H. Wente, Circuit Executive, I, Laura J. McGarry, hereby petition the judicial council for review of the evidence, established law, and legislative authority that without question determines Judicial Misconduct by Magistrate Judge Sorokin and the Honorable Judge George A. OToole. The ORDER I received on May 18, 2011 regarding the complaints Nos. 01-11-90007 and 01-11-90008 with the undersigned as the Honorable Chief Judge Sandra Lynch is deficient. The case at hand is a civil Action No. 1:10-cv-11343-GAO, captioned as Laura J. McGarry v. Geriatric Facilities of Cape Cod, Inc., et al, In the United States District Court of Massachusetts. The deficient order of May 18, 2011 regarding this Plaintiffs complaint of Judicial Misconduct has reached a conclusion that is not only contrary to the evidence but ignores established law, legislative authority, the model rules of professional conduct, and the fact that the Magistrate Judge has ignored blatant fraud upon the court by the Defense Counsel along with the inappropriate usurpation of the case by the pro se staff attorney. Judge OTooles name as the undersigned on any document is not by his approval or knowledge. The ORDER took liberty to address the allegations that this Plaintiff has made in regards to the Pro Se Staff Attorney, Barbara Morse; therefore, Barbara Morses inappropriate and illegal conduct regarding her actions during this litigation are now officially a part of this complaint and all text regarding the actions of Barbara Morse was also deficient in the ORDER undersigned by the Honorable Chief Judge Sandra Lynch. This Plaintiff finds the signature on the ORDER to have some questionable markers that indicate the possibility that it is in fact a forgery. On June 20, 2011 Plaintiff was DENIED a Petition of Mandamus No. 11-1668 heard in the First District Court of Appeals and she finds that the Honorable Chief Sandra Lynch taking position on the panel for this ruling inappropriate since she supposedly wrote the ORDER for the judicial misconduct complaint discussed herein. The total text of the Extraordinary Writ contains a consolidated view of all the evidence and law that was presented to Florence Pagano during the processing of this misconduct complaint including the context of the initial complaint and the context of multiple subsequent emails in which the filings on record of the RULINGS, submissions by the Plaintiff and by the defense were directly provided as well as multiple exhibits (the index provided in the Writ will be helpful to you over going through the multiple emails I sent to Ms. Pagano but I will provide you copies of any and emails upon request). Direct evidence of fraud by the Defense counsel was shown to Florence Pagano including swapping PDF files that had been submitted into the ECF system as scanned with word processed PDF files with clerk assistance after Plaintiff filed for sanctions. All of the aforementioned was ignored by the Magistrate who also ignored Supreme Court Law with the limited involvement that he did have in the case. All the aforementioned was provided and presented with argument by this Plaintiff as well as the law and court rules regarding the authority of the Magistrate yet the ORDER ignored all. The ORDER made a blatant false
statement and claimed there was no docket manipulation (see docket activity report for 9/26/2010 and 1/20/20011). TheORDER ignored not erroneous, but bizarre rulings such as Plaintiff was prohibited from referencing the docket. The ORDER ignored that there was absolutely no consent to the Magistrate and that he had no authority to RULE under 28 USC 636 (b) or deny this Plaintiff review by the US District Judge. The ORDER ignored that Barbara Morse RULED on both injunctive relief and contempt motions of which she was the subject and then signed the US District Judge and Magistrate Judges name respectively. The transcript from the bogus scheduling conference of 2/14/2011 where Plaintiff was directly denied her rights as witnessed by her son who was in the court room was not referenced for the decision as Plaintiff requested. Nowhere in the complaint was it ever stated that the Magistrate improperly delegated to the pro se staff attorney. It does state that the pro se staff attorney did not provide the process to consent to the Magistrates jurisdiction so she could maintain the case on the US District judges docket and usurp the action. Reference to the Magistrate was written in an order by the pro se staff attorney as she RULED on the injunctive relief motion by this Plaintiff of which she was subject. Plaintiff then filed contempt against the pro se staff attorney and defense counsel for collusion. The order of reference was already written and the contempt motion RULING was written by the pro se staff attorney before the Magistrate was aware the case was on his docket and the events that followed are clearly the Magistrate covering for the pro se staff attorney and defense counsels inappropriate actions. I cannot in the context of this letter describe all the improprieties that have happened in this case. READ THE WRIT---it contains nothing that was not already alleged during the processing of this complaint including the fact that on February 23rd a motion for reassignment of both District and Magistrate Judges was filed by this plaintiff and the Magistrate denied with Docket text and terminated the motion. Not until March 23rd in the R & R for the contempt did the Magistrate make any reference to the fact that there was a motion for a reassignment to a different US District judge; an R & R that continues to linger with now a four full months passing since the request for reassignment that has not been answered by the US District Judge. I am being blocked from a US District Judge because not only has there been misconduct and unethical behavior but there has been criminal behavior and should I have contact with the US District Judge these illegal actions will be revealed. Plaintiff also questions the legitimacy of this Appeals Court RULING because it concluded that the Plaintiff should be denied a hearing before the US District Judge in an action filed on August 2, 2010 that has solid evidence of usurpation supported by established law, legislative authority, rules of the court and the record itself, as well as, a pending bogus contempt R & R to the US District Judge by the Magistrate from back in March that continues to linger. Plaintiff clearly stated that she was being blocked from the US District Judge and that filing to the Magistrate to schedule a hearing before the US District Judge or attempt to schedule through the US District Judges clerks would be an act in futility. This Plaintiff is currently present in the State of Massachusetts because her father has died and Plaintiffs financial status will not allow for a return trip. It is interesting that this RULING has not been posted on the Appeals Court web site.
There seems to be a problem in the First Circuit and justice for this Plaintiff has been set aside over favor to provide cover for the inappropriate and illegal actions of court staff, the Magistrate and Defense Counsel during the course of Plaintiffs action. I truly hope that I have reached someone who finds this not only peculiar but an insult to the justice system itself as well as an insult to our Honorable Judges in Massachusetts where their own staff are tarnishing the perception of their quality and integrity. Please take action. Yours truly, Laura J. McGarry June 21, 2011
INTENTIONAL BLANK SPACE
The Defendants facility is called Pleasant Bay Nursing and Rehabilitation Center; it is located in Brewster, Massachusetts where they care for one of Americas most vulnerable demographics.
The Defendants, Geriatric Facilities of Cape Cod, Inc., et all, built their facility with the assistance of Government funds, HUD, and their main source of income is MEDICAID and MEDICARE money. They have caused career changes for multiple people in their quest to avoid restitution to this Plaintiff which explains why this Plaintiffs Discovery Plan was stricken from the record by the corrupt staff of the court. Knowing the evidence and law was strongly against them they chose these alleged corrupt Jackson Lewis attorneys to get them through the EEOC investigation and this litigation. Defendant Webster holds the secretary seat on the Massachusetts Board of Nursing Home Administrators which was a convenient avenue for her retaliation which destroyed the Plaintiffs career. Her position on this board along with the level of corruption cover up that involves attorneys and court staff causes concern beyond the litigation. My father died in a nursing home where as a confused, disoriented resident he was coerced into signing papers to surrender his life insurance policies under the ruse that he qualified for Masshealth; he was told that if he signed they would be able to move him to an assisted living facility in his home town where his friends would be able to visit. The state looks back five years at financial data to determine Masshealth qualification; my father would have had to spend down approximately $74,000.00 toward his healthcare cost before he would have qualified for Masshealth. He was not given this information and told he would have to spend down only the amount received in the surrenders to $2,000; he did not have any means to spend down the $74,000.00 that would have been required in order to qualify for Masshealth; He would never qualify. They had already moved him from a rehabilitation floor to a long term care floor and had no intention of moving him to his home town where his care needs were beyond assisted living. In violation of CMR 940, I was never told that he was moved to a different level of care or that he was declining physically and suffering confusion. He had an available POA (power of attorney) and a healthcare proxy; they made life altering decisions and claimed he agreed to their plan of withdrawing his routine medications and going to only palliative care with no POA signature for the surrender and no proxy present for the so called comfort care discussion. My Dad died 42 days after he signed the surrenders; purposeful negligent care caused his early death. Apparently the nursing home is now looking to be paid the private pay sub acute rate because his last bill I received was just over $1000.00 and the person who was his spring type POA, which the doctor refused to spring until my Dad was actively dying, was informed that the nursing
home is now owed approximately $27,000.00 which would be the combined worth of the surrenders and his car. The Director of Nursing of this nursing home had her position posted as open the day they learned I would soon be getting on a plane and coming in from Seattle; she is from Cape Cod. My dad even in his confused state was telling me I had to get him out of there as soon as possible and making statements that caused me to determine his request was not part of his confusion especially when I considered his request in relation to all the inappropriate measures this nursing home had just recently taken. When I arrived he immediately asked me to take him home; unfortunately within a couple of hours after that request he was actively dying from kidney failure, dehydration and an infection that the nursing home caused; before my arrival and knowing I was on my way they had stopped the antibiotic that was treating the infection. He died a miserable death and five days after I arrived he was gone. Massachusetts DOI finds no problem with the aforementioned and has decided that the life insurance company should not be required to vacate the surrender papers and honor the beneficiary; the DOI deliberately misinterpreted the information they were given and ignored established Massachusetts law regarding competency to sign legal papers and that only a competent owner of a policy can sign to make changes to a life insurance policy. Tom Walsh of the DOI made the DOI determination. The fact that the long term care industry is intrinsically problematic was noted and supported in the Plaintiffs Complaint and this alleged homicide to ensure reimbursement requires an investigation to see if the motive of the alleged homicide included ensuring that the Plaintiff remained financially incapable of affording an attorney. It is now over three weeks since this was reported to the Division of Health Care Quality and no investigation has taken place. The Massachusetts AG office passed this complaint onto the Division of Health Care Quality. Apparently they chose not to investigate the Medicaid Consultant who arrived at the nursing home moments after I arrived from Seattle; in a short meeting she was informed that my father also had a bank account with my name on it. Her reply was, No he didnt. I did not know about the five year look back, at the time, and was exhausted from taking the red eye flight; I did not challenge her bizarre reply at the time thinking, Well, I believe I would know that better than you. The Medicaid Consultant is married to an attorney; her name is Kathy Brunelle. Apparently FRAUD in this state is accepted as the norm at all levels and only acted upon by law enforcement when an appearance of relevancy is due and then one of the lesser elite is targeted.
CITIZENS OF MASSACHUSETTS YOU HAVE A PROBLEM!!!

Isnt comforting to know that our taxed paid public servants are all too willing to help obstruct justice as long as you have the right corrupt attorney and a whole lot of money?
Deputy Clerk Paul Lyness, Deputy Clerk, to the Honorable George A. OToole, Jr. was called on July 8, 2011 and informed of the Plaintiffs filings with the court on that date. He was informed that there were no attorneys legally on the record and that the Plaintiff was requesting a ruling within 72 hours because she remained in Massachusetts where her son was hospitalized and that she needed to take her son back to Washington for his healthcare needs. The motion had an emergency qualifier and the docket text requested a ruling without opposition because of the fact no filings, by rule, could be recognized by the court from unauthorized attorneys. In the time period since the July 8th filing, Lyness was called no less than four more times; still no ruling and the unauthorized attorneys filed the Defendants oppositions. With Plaintiffs latest filing, 39 days later, she, again, called Lyness; it was, again, reiterated that there were no attorneys on the record and that this Plaintiff had been in the court for over a year with absolutely zero legitimate court process and that she needed a ruling on her emergent motions so she could take her son back to Washington. The Plaintiff asked to speak to the Judge; she was denied. The Plaintiff stated that attorneys, when special problems arise, speak to the Judges and queried as to why she was being denied the same treatment. His answer was she had to go through the Deputy Clerk or the Clerk of the Court; we know how effective the Clerk of the Court was going to be! After the July 8th filing this Plaintiff called Chief Judge Wolfs Deputy Clerk and asked to speak to the Chief Judge; she was denied and told she needed to make her complaint to the Clerk of the Court. Chief Judge Wolfs Deputy Clerk took the Plaintiffs complaint and phone number stating he would give the information to the Clerk of the Court; he was told that she was already aware of the circumstances and responded to this Plaintiff with a threat of criminal charges via the US Marshal and that Dr. Zernik has filed with the US Congress to have her and Judge OToole impeached but he insisted this was the route the Plaintiff had to take. Most shockingly the Clerk of the Court did not contact the Plaintiff to help her resolve the situation! Request Filed with the US Congress to Impeach Judge George A. OToole, Jr. and Clerk of the Court Sarah Allison Thornton US District Court of Massachusetts http://t.co/Qws9e3n
WITHOUT QUESTION FRAUD IS THE NORM IN THE US DISTRICT COURT OF MASSACHUSETTS

Dishonest Service Fraud With Obstruction of Justice in the US District Court of Massachusetts! Rule of Law & the Constitution Mean Nothing to the Staff of This Court!! Collusion and Conspiracy to Violate Rights! Names Named!

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Dishonest Service Fraud With Obstruction of Justice in the US District Court of Massachusetts! Rule of Law & the Constitution Mean Nothing to the Staff of This Court!! Collusion and Conspiracy to Violate Rights! Names Named!

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

UNAUTHORIZED ATTORNEYS COLLUDE WITH COURT STAFF AND RUN A PRETENSE LITIGATION GHOST WRITING FOR THE COURTOBSTRUCTION

INTENTIONAL BLANK SPACE

CITIZENS OF MASSACHUSETTS YOU HAVE A PROBLEM!!!

WITHOUT QUESTION FRAUD IS THE NORM IN THE US DISTRICT COURT OF MASSACHUSETTS

You might also like

Dishonest Service Fraud With Obstruction of Justice in the US District Court of Massachusetts! Rule of Law &amp; the Constitution Mean Nothing to the Staff of This Court!! Collusion and Conspiracy to Violate Rights! Names Named!

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Dishonest Service Fraud With Obstruction of Justice in the US District Court of Massachusetts! Rule of Law &amp; the Constitution Mean Nothing to the Staff of This Court!! Collusion and Conspiracy to Violate Rights! Names Named!

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

UNAUTHORIZED ATTORNEYS COLLUDE WITH COURT STAFF AND RUN A PRETENSE LITIGATION GHOST WRITING FOR THE COURTOBSTRUCTION

INTENTIONAL BLANK SPACE

CITIZENS OF MASSACHUSETTS YOU HAVE A PROBLEM!!!

WITHOUT QUESTION FRAUD IS THE NORM IN THE US DISTRICT COURT OF MASSACHUSETTS

You might also like

Dishonest Service Fraud With Obstruction of Justice in the US District Court of Massachusetts! Rule of Law & the Constitution Mean Nothing to the Staff of This Court!! Collusion and Conspiracy to Violate Rights! Names Named!

Dishonest Service Fraud With Obstruction of Justice in the US District Court of Massachusetts! Rule of Law & the Constitution Mean Nothing to the Staff of This Court!! Collusion and Conspiracy to Violate Rights! Names Named!