Soviet stile justice system at work in USA today in our Family Courts!

Fact: Concentration Camps were invented by communists during 1920 era in USSR - long before Nazis in Germany came to power. Fact: They were filled with ordinary folks who were accused of been an enemy of the Communist State and who could not prove otherwise during judicial hearing without a jury. Fact: Mere accusation of been an enemy of the State was prima facie evidence and the burden of proof shifted toward accused. Fact: To be a judge in USSR one had to be a communist. Fact: More people died in Soviet concentration camps than in Nazis camps.

CATTON vs. CATTON lay man analysis of the case and law There is no system ever devised by mankind that is guaranteed to rip husband and wife or father, mother and child apart so bitterly than our present Family Court System. Judge Brian Lindsay Retired Supreme Court Judge New York, New York There is something bad happening to our children in family courts today that is causing them more harm than drugs, more harm than crime, and even more harm than child molestation. Judge Watson L. White Superior Court Judge Cobb County, Georgia The America once extolled as the voice of liberty heard around the world no longer is cast in the image which Jefferson and Madison designed, but more in the Russian image. Chief Justice Douglas, Laird v. Tatum, 408 U.S. 1 (1972) Fact: To be a judge in USA one must be a lawyer. Fact: Prosecutor is a lawyer belonging to the same bar association as judge belongs no different than bar association been a communist party.

Fact: Judges and lawyers meet at the bar association, even though the law says that ex parte communication between judge and lawyer is prohibited. (But who is watching?) Fact: There is no jury in Family Court during criminal non-support proceeding and people go to jail without Constitutional Due Process in force. Fact: According to our Constitution, no one can be sentenced to jail without a jury of his peers. Fact: All family laws are written and created by lawyers and judges. Fact: They all personally profit through Social Security Title IV-D federal funding, which dictates them creation of dead beat fathers so they can hunt them for a living. Fact: There are more per capita prisoners in USA than in any country of the world. Fact: Prisons in USA is a multibillion dollars industry and prison companies are traded on the stock exchanges.

In CATTON vs. CATTON ex wife accuses ex husband that he is willfully not paying what the judge ordered. It is my understanding that she knows that ex either has money in his bank or pocket, or she knows that he is making enough to pay what order says. Soo, if this is the case, I guess, she is pleading it in her petition. Noop, from this order (below) I can understand that all she had to say is that he stop paying the ordered amount and that fact by itself constituted prima facie evidence of willfulness. I am not talking about the fact that he stopped paying as ordered due to some problem that he had. The law does not care or account that you might have a problem and says: how dare you not to pay, period!!! Just like mafia boss tells a restaurant owner: If you do not bring me the money that I ordered you to bring me every month, Im going to break your leg, and I do not care that there is recession out there and restaurant business sucks. I bet that if this restaurant owner asked him for a gun and a getaway car to rob a bank, they would off provide them as a remedy. I am asking myself: Who could off come up with such a law in America? Retard? Most likely not since this person managed to become a lawyer. Ooo noo! This was a clever lawyer(s) to create this law, to name a father (which man is not?) child support deadbeat so everybody will hate him and Public Policy will be to hunt those deadbeats with taxpayers money. (Check out http://www.greaterthings.com/Word-Number/666/42USC_sec666.htm section 666: Social Security Laws. Only Satanist could assign this number as a curse). Now the lawyers, judges and jailers have a business to run and the whole judicial machinery begins to work. Brooklyn Family Court is for Profit Corporation listed on Dun & Bradstreet and court personal proudly call this court the busiest in the nation. (Go to Facebook.com and see for yourself)

Back to the case. The man is ordered to prove his innocence, which every lawyer knows it is impossible to prove a negative, but this guy, let him be an accountant, does not know that. He is bringing some papers to court, tells this judge his story hoping to prove his innocence. The judge pretends that he is trying to get down to the bottom of the issue by listening and asking questions. The judge is asking the father to offer credible, competent evidence of his inability to comply with this order. My question is: what will be competent, credible evidence and where are definitions? I could not find any answer to this in any family law. Also, who is to say which is which? In a criminal court, murderer is not forced to come up with a competent, credible evidence of his inability to murder, LOL! Rather, prosecutor must prove what he did. There is criminal law that defines what competent, credible evidence is which is absolutely must be shown to the jury. Finally, the judge calls fathers attempts lacking creditability in his testimony, as he knew from the beginning that he will sentence poor guy to six month in jail. I am thinking what, possibly, could this guy bring to court to prove lack of money? A bank statement showing $10 left? The judge would say that its pathetic as you could have a bank account offshore and I am not convinced. Lets see, a tax return showing that he did not make a lot of money pathetic as you could have some cash jobs. After all, the judge believes that there is a gold bullion buried in accountants backyard. So, to test judges hunch he offers poor father an opportunity to purge himself of the contempt by paying $31,000 toward arrears. Nowhere in this order has it said that judge knows that poor father has any money. The order says father was found to be not credible and therefore I am going to gamble by giving him an opportunity to purge himself out of contempt by paying $31,000. Who is this judge - mafia boss I am giving you an opportunity to rob a bank, and if you do am not going to break your leg? As expected, the guy did not pay aaand uuuups, judge lost his gamble and father went to jail for six months. Is this shit, pardon my French, insult of human intelligence? How to call this lawyer who pretends that he believes that he does JUSTICE and helps a mom to raise her kid by collecting a child support? To add more insult to the injury, while this poor soul was in jail, he probably filed an appeal to be immediately released from jail, which was dismissed as academic. WF, did this guy attend an academy course and became a Phd graduate, while he was in jail? Now has no right to complain as he personally benefited from jail term! Just kidding! My guess is that appellate court judges sooo freaking busy working (or pretending to work on a golf course with some lawyer) that by the time his papers got to them six month jail term was over and the guy was released anyway. Thats their code word to cover up this problem. You see, the Family Court judges must take care of fellow appellate court judges in the Interest Of (Judges) Justice so that there will be no unemployment problem amongst judges. I bet that for the government it will be much much cheaper if to every kid without a father living together as family, government pays some sum of money. But what this army of lawyers, judges, and jailers will do? That is the reason why we do not have the flat tax system proposed many

years ago. Again, what all these armies of tax lawyers, tax judges, tax accountants and IRS agents will do? How will they PLUNDER this nation? I bet that today, America has more public servants and public recipients combined, than productive force of this country! Who won in this and every case like this? Mother did not get any money for the kid. If, before, father paid her some, but not all amount of money, during this six month he paid none! If he had any office and clientele before, he lost his lease for nonpayment. His clientele went somewhere else and when this guy was released from jail he had no business to run. If he had a property and mortgage, it went into foreclosure and his kid is not going to inherit a thing. If this guy rented an apartment, he became homeless for nonpayment of rent. And, by the way, who is now going to employ a criminal and deadbeat father? Who is going to pay a child support now? Whats left for this guy is to go on food stamp and welfare program so much for a system that is helping a mother to raise her kid sucking away taxpayers money! It is 10 year anniversary of September 11 terrorist attack. America was not attacked by terrorists for 10 years and people feel safer today! Aaa, who am I kidding? All these years, hard working men and women were attacked every day by domestic terrorists covered up as lawyers, judges, Child Protective Services, Child Support Collection Units, etc. Read this case and see for yourself!!! Make sure that you read every case that is cited in this case to get the felling off what I am talking about.

O)(4L

0 A/
D15691 C/hu

*uprrmt (&utrt of t1 'tati 01 Ntw Dark Appellate iutiuxi: cunb 3Juiiciat Diepartmient

AD3d HOWARD MILLER, J.P. WILLIAM F. MASTRO MARK C. DILLON WILLIAM B. McCARTHY, JJ.

Submitted - May 15, 2007

2006-07411 In the Matter of Harry Catton, appellant, v Elvira Catton, respondent. (Docket No. F-35425-03)

DECISION & ORDER

Salvatore C. Adamo, New York, N.Y., for appellant. Peter M. Nissman, New York, N.Y., for respondent. In a support proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 4, the father appeals from an order of commitment of the Family Court, Kings County (Pearl, J.), dated June 19, 2006, which, upon confirming an order ofthe same court (Milsap, S.M.), dated May 31, 2006, which, after a hearing, found that he willfully violated a prior order of support, committed him to the custody of the New York City Department of Corrections for a term of imprisonment of six months with the opportunity to purge himself of the contempt by paying the sum of $31,833.10 towards his arrears. ORDERED that the appeal from somuch f commitment as committed the father to a term of imprisonment of six months is dismissed as academic, without costs or disbursements; and it is further, WA ck C(

a- c4-i

ORDERED that the order of commitment is affirmed insofar as reviewed, without costs or disbursements. child sui.ort as ordered constituted (prima facie evidence v of a willful violation of the support order (see Family Ct Kt McDermott, 12 atter of Richards vBailey, 296 AD2d 412, 413). The burden of June 26, 2007

'

&

I 112

a J-

L4-42 P ag e 1.

MATTER OF CATTON v CATTON

J2

ct

going forward then shifted to the father to offer metent,redible evidence of his inability comply with the order (see Matter of Rosato vRosato, 21 AD3d 418;7iiroChowanec v McDermott, supra). The father, whom the Support Magistrate found lacked credibility in his testimony regarding his income and access to funds, failed to sustain this burden (see Matter ofKelly v Schoonbeck, 34 AD3d 1094, 1095; Matter of Rosato v RosatO, supra).

MILLER, J.P., MASTRO, DILLON and McCARTHY, JJ., concur.

ENTER: James Edward Peizer Clerk of the Court

June 26, 2007 MATTER OF CATTON v CATTON

Page 2.