You are on page 1of 88

Notice on The Regulation of Obligatory Institutional Fees

Presented for the 149nd regular session of the Board of Directors (CAO-14911) February 11, 12 and 13, 2011 In Montral

Fdration tudiante universitaire du Qubec

The Fdration tudiante universitaire du Qubec (FEUQ) is an organization that brings together 15 student associations with more than 125,000 students from all levels of and every region of Quebec. Established since 1989, its main mandate has been to defend the rights and interests of students with governments and education stakeholders. Throughout its twenty years of existence, it has endeavored to defend a humanistic education as a societal choice. It focuses particularly on defending its members before, during and after their passage in university by demanding, above all, an accessible and quality education.

Fdration tudiante universitaire du Qubec 210 Sainte-Catherine St. East Suite 300 Montral (Qubec) H2X 1L1 Telephone: (514) 396-3380 Fax: (514) 396-7140

Update Supervision

Guillaume Houle, vice-president of university affairs Louis-Philippe Savoie, vice-president of university affairs (2009-2010) Laurent Viau, university affairs attach (2009-2010)

Analysis and writing Linguistic revision

Pascal Marchi, contractual researcher Louis-Philippe Savoie, vice-president of university affairs (2009-2010) Laurent Viau, university affairs attach (2009-2010)

All rights reserved FEUQ 2011

Summary
In order to promote accessibility to university studies, the government of Quebec has maintained a policy of a freeze of tuition fees from 1968-1969 to 1990-1991, then to 19951996 to 2006-2007. Despite everything, the financial burden of university students hasnt stopped increasing, since universities have abundantly used their power to bill in order to impose obligatory fees of various kinds and amounts that are unceasingly increasing. Thus, between 1994 and 2007 while the tuition fee freeze was in force, the annual average bill of a university student increased by nearly $450, according to the data of Statistics Canada. In this situation, the FEUQ has numerous times demanded a law on accessibility to postsecondary studies that regulates both tuition fees and ancillary fees (or obligatory institutional fees). Despite the electoral commitment of the QLP and the PQ to this effect in 2003, we had to wait until 2008 so that a regulation (and not a law) arrived to limit the power to bill of university administrations. This regulation has allowed students from many universities to avoid sudden hikes in obligatory fees. However, it leaves a margin of manoeuvre to institutions in such a way that an average increase of about 5% was observed in 2008-2009 and that a similar increase should be maintained in 2010-2011, with the more voracious universities continuing to impose the largest increases. The regulation thus partially responds to the expectations of the FEUQ, since it prevents institutions from proceeding to large increases without an agreement with student associations. However, the door remains open to a continuous increase of fees. Moreover, we cannot expect to see the gaps between different universities shrink in the short term. Finally, certain institutions have not hesitated to circumvent the regulation (among others with automatic non-obligatory contributions in doubtful conditions) or to blatantly violate it (with the only consequence of reimbursing the amounts collected in excess). Before this situation, it is necessary to do a close follow-up of the supervision of obligatory institutional fees in order to ensure the best protection possible for students. Furthermore, given the deficiencies observed in regard to the modalities of supervision, the FEUQ repeats its demand concerning the adoption of a law regulating ancillary fees and preventing increases that are not the fruit of an agreement between the university administration and the association representing the students concerned. The reevaluation announced after three years of the application of the regulation of obligatory institutional fees represents the opportunity to give oneself a better tool in order to protect students from unjustified increases.

Notice of the regulation on obligatory institutional fees Fdration tudiante universitaire du Qubec - 2011

ii

List of recommendations
1. 2. 3. 4. 5. That the MELS establish a common classification of obligatory institutional fees between different university institutions That the MELS establish an exhaustive list of OIF with a clear definition of what is an OIF That the limit of increases allowed by the university be applied to the typical student and not according to all students of an institution. That the autonomy of decisional bodies of student associations be respected at all times for the approval of agreements concerning obligatory institutional fees. That the documents produced by an institution in virtue of the budgetary rules regarding obligatory institutional fees be made accessible to associations representing students of this institution. That the Quebec government makes available online the positioning of each of Quebec universities on the grid framework of OIF and therefore set out the maximum increase allowed for each semester and a list of universities by OIF every year. That the MELS revise its interpretation of Article 3.3.2. of the fiscal rules that it considers that academic year includes fall, winter and summer semesters for the application of the OIF guidelines. That MELS forbids any OIF that is not entirely admissible to the student financial assistance program. That MELS limit agreements between representative student associations and university institutions to three years. That MELS limit allowable increases by adding a 4th level of permitted increases to $0 when the average OIF of university institutions are above $785. That penalties are applied in the case of non-compliance to the obligations of the universities in regard to adherence to the application of the rule regulating OIF. That all extension fees remain included within the reporting entity of obligatory institutional fees. That non-mandatory automatic contributions be regulated by the regulation. This regulation should require an agreement between the institution and the student association concerned in order to impose contributions. That the National Assembly of Quebec adopt a law regulating obligatory institutional fees required by university educational institutions (as well as their
iii

6.

7.

8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13.

14.

Notice of the regulation on obligatory institutional fees Fdration tudiante universitaire du Qubec - 2011

components) and stipulate that such fees can only be imposed if the nature, amount, and modalities of these fees are the object of an agreement between the institution and the student association recognized as being the representative of the students concerned. (CAU-643) Recommendations relative to student financial assistance 15. 16. That student financial assistance make public a list of tuition fees recognized as allowable expenses for each of the programs of study. That the amount of allowable expenses as tuition fees in the Loans Program for part-time studies be adjusted on a case-by-case basis to minimally cover the tuition fees, the obligatory institutional fees, student dues and the fees for didactic material. These adjustments must ensure the maintenance or increase of the volume of assistance available for beneficiaries of the program

Notice of the regulation on obligatory institutional fees Fdration tudiante universitaire du Qubec - 2011

iv

List of acronyms
SFA NOAC CCAFE CRPUQ CSN CSQ FTE NAP TS FACUM Student Financial Assistance Non-obligatory automatic contribution Comit consultatif sur laccessibilit financire aux tudes Confrence des recteurs et principaux des universits du Qubec Confdration des syndicats nationaux Centrale des syndicats du Qubec Full-time equivalent (students) cole nationale dadministration publique cole de technologie suprieure Fdration des associations tudiantes du campus de lUniversit de Montral FEUQ Fdration tudiante universitaire du Qubec OIF Obligatory Institutional Fees FNEEQ-CSN Fdration nationale des enseignantes et enseignants du Qubec (CSN) FQPPU Fdration qubcoise des professeures et professeurs duniversit INRS Institut national de la recherche scientifique CPI Consumer Price Increase MELS Ministre de lducation, du Loisir et du Sport MEQ Ministre de lducation du Qubec QLP Quebec Liberal Party PQ Parti qubcois UdeM Universit de Montral UQAC Universit du Qubec Chicoutimi UQAM Universit du Qubec Montral UQAR Universit du Qubec Rimouski UQAT Universit du Qubec en Abitibi-Tmiscamingue UQO Universit du Qubec en Outaouais UQTR Universit du Qubec Trois-Rivires

Notice of the regulation on obligatory institutional fees Fdration tudiante universitaire du Qubec - 2011

Table of contents
SUMMARY II LIST OF RECOMMENDATIONS .........................................................................................................................III LIST OF ACRONYMS .............................................................................................................................................. V TABLE OF CONTENTS...........................................................................................................................................VI 1 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................................ 8 2 THE PROBLEM OF OBLIGATORY INSTITUTIONAL FEES ................................................................... 9 2.1 DEFINITION OF THE CONCEPT ......................................................................................................................... 9 2.2 CATEGORIZATION OF THE OIF ...................................................................................................................... 10 2.3 HISTORY ......................................................................................................................................................... 10

2.4 STATE OF THE SITUATION FROM 2007 TO 2010 ............................................................................................. 16 3 ANALYSIS OF THE REGULATORY SUPERVISION OF OIF................................................................. 21 3.1 INTERPRETATION OF THE BUDGETARY RULE ................................................................................................. 21 3.2 ANALYSIS OF THE BUDGETARY RULE ............................................................................................................. 22 3.3 GENERAL PROBLEMS OF THE APPLICATION OF THE RULE............................................................................. 24

2.3.1 Non-regulated fees to circumvent the tuition fee freeze...................................................... 10 2.3.2 Defreeze of tuition fees and the regulation of OIF .................................................................. 13 2.3.3 Evolution of ancillary fees in time .......................................................................................... 14

3.1.1 Individual application of the limits of the increase ................................................................. 21 3.1.2 Limit applying to the summer term ........................................................................................ 21 3.2.1 In regard to the objectives fixed by MELS .............................................................................. 22 3.2.2 In regard to the preoccupations expressed by the FEUQ........................................................ 23 3.3.1 Uncertainty concerning the limit imposed on each university............................................... 24 3.3.2 Non-obligatory automatic contributions (NOAC)................................................................. 25 3.3.3 Fees for the writing of masters and doctoral theses ............................................................... 27 3.4.1 cole polytechnique de Montral ............................................................................................ 28 3.4.2 Universit de Montral ........................................................................................................... 29 3.4.3 Universities without general association ................................................................................ 29 3.5.1 The case of the Faculty of dentistry at the University of Montreal ........................................ 30 3.5.2 Public transit at the Universit de Sherbrooke ....................................................................... 30 3.6.1 University of Montreal ........................................................................................................... 31 3.6.2 Polytechnic .............................................................................................................................. 32 4.1.1 4.1.2 4.1.3 4.1.4 4.1.5 4.1.6 4.1.7 4.1.8 Establish a common vocabulary .............................................................................................. 33 Individual limit ....................................................................................................................... 33 Process of approval of an agreement by the student association............................................. 33 Transparence of data concerning obligatory institutional fees ............................................... 34 Application of the limit on the summer session ...................................................................... 35 Limit Increases ........................................................................................................................ 35 Inclusion of all extension fees.................................................................................................. 37 Supervision of non-mandatory automatic contributions........................................................ 37

3.4 PARTICULAR PROBLEMS OCCURRING IN 2008-09 ......................................................................................... 28

3.5 SPECIFIC PROBLEMS OCCURRING IN 2009-2010............................................................................................ 30 3.6 REFUND OF OVERPAYMENTS ......................................................................................................................... 31

4 RECOMMENDATIONS TO IMPROVE THE REGULATION OF OIF.................................................. 32 4.1 ON THE APPLICATION OF THE CURRENT REGULATION ................................................................................ 32

4.2 LEGISLATIVE REGULATION OF OBLIGATORY INSTITUTIONAL FEES ............................................................... 37 4.3 RECOMMENDATIONS RELATIVE TO STUDENT FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE ....................................................... 38

4.3.1 Loan and bursaries program ................................................................................................... 38 4.3.2 Loan programs for part-time studies....................................................................................... 39 vi

Notice of the regulation on obligatory institutional fees Fdration tudiante universitaire du Qubec - 2011

5 CONCLUSION ................................................................................................................................................... 41 6 LIST OF SOURCES............................................................................................................................................ 42

Notice of the regulation on obligatory institutional fees Fdration tudiante universitaire du Qubec - 2011

vii

Introduction

Since the implementation of the recommendations of the Parent Report, published in 1966, the Quebec government has regulated the level of the tuition fees required by universities. In order to favor the accessibility to university studies, these fees were frozen from 1968-1969 to 1990-1991, then from 1995-1996 to 2006-2007, thus responding to a demand of the student movement in general, and the FEUQ in particular. Despite the application of this policy on tuition fees, the financial burden of students has not stopped increasing because of the imposition by universities of fees of diverse kinds and of an unceasingly increasing scope. Thus, since the announcement of the last tuition fee freeze between 1994 and 2007 while the tuition fee freeze was in force, the annual bill of the university student increased by nearly $450, according to the data of Statistics Canada. In 2004, the Comit consultatif sur laccessibilit financire aux tudes reminded us that tuition fees and other required fees are indivisible and form a unity, namely the total bill paid to the university or the relative cost of education assumed by students (CCAFE, 2004, p. 7). It is in this perspective that the FEUQ, since its first years, has demanded a regulation of these fees and has made the adoption of a law on financial accessibility to studies one of its recurring demands. In this notice, we will make a brief return on the history of the phenomenon of obligatory institutional fees (also called ancillary fees, supplementary fees, etc) and on the conditions that led to the announcement, in February 2008, of the putting in place of a regulation of their evolution through rules governing grants to universities. Secondly, we will examine the modalities of this regulation in light of the objectives and the concerns expressed by the FEUQ throughout the years. The effectiveness of this measure to counter the unjustified proliferation of obligatory institutional fees will also be evaluated by taking into account the available data on their recent variations. Finally, in light of the problems raised, we will issue recommendations aiming to apply more effectively the regulation of these obligatory institutional fees currently in place and proposing a concrete solution to improve the protection of students against sudden and unjustified hikes.

Notice on The Regulation of Obligatory Institutional Fees Fdration tudiante universitaire du Qubec - 2011

2
2.1

The problem of obligatory institutional fees


Definition of the concept

The notions of obligatory institutional fees, ancillary fees, administrative fees, supplementary fees, etc., are often used indistinctly to designate a set of expenses imposed on students for their studies within university institutions, creating a certain confusion regarding the exact scope of this concept. For the purposes of this discussion, it is necessary to find ourselves a unique definition of the terms we encounter. For the notion of obligatory institutional fees OIF), we will refer to the definition, voluntarily inclusive, given by the Ministre de lducation, du Loisir et du Sport (MELS):
the set of obligatory fees imposed by universities on their students, to the exclusion of tuition fees []. The OIF encompass general fees (admission, registration, examination, internship, etc.), technological fees, student service fees, contribution to student life, copyright fees, thesis writing fees, premiums for certain obligatory insurances, fees related to sports and recreation and various other fees (transcripts, issuance of diplomas, laboratories, uniforms, etc.). Also part of OIF are fees imposed for certain recourses such as fees for the revision of marks. (MELS, 2008c, p. 29)

Obligatory institutional fees are a sub-set of what we generally call ancillary fees, a vague notion that includes, for some, student association dues, other contributions fixed by them and various penalties (ex.: lateness at the library) (CCAFE, 2008, p. 12). The FEUQ, just as the virtual totality of student associations (see section 2.2.3), always opposed the inclusion of student association dues1 in the definition of ancillary fees, since students freely consented, through the democratic bodies of their associations (FEUQ, 2007, p. 4). Unless the contrary is mentioned, the notion used for the rest of this document will be that of the OIF, with the definition of the MELS. It is to be noted that MELS included in the definition of OIF not only fees that appeared systematically on the same bill, but also one-time fees (admission application, diploma fee) or again the use of certain services (transcripts, fees for the revision of marks, etc). Though desirable, since it aims to reflect the overall financial charge imposed on each student, this choice, as we will see later on, engenders a certain complexity in the application of regulation rules. Finally, MELS decided to explicitly exclude certain fees from the perimeter of OIF:
Fines, fees for late payments or other penalties applicable to certain students that derogate from the requirements financial and administrative management; Insurance premiums paid by foreign students; The purchase of equipment or a durable good that remains the property of the student. (MELS, 2008c, p. 29)

We mean here not only fees destined to finance student associations as such, but also those destined for other student organizations (radio, newspapers, daycares, etc), as long as they were fixed by a democratic student body, by virtue of An Act respecting the accreditation and financing of students associations or a similar process. Notice on The Regulation of Obligatory Institutional Fees Fdration tudiante universitaire du Qubec - 2011

If the application of the definition of the MELS and the decision to include or not a fee given in the entity of the OIF targeted by the budgetary rule can give rise to disputes, the definition in itself is generally consensual. 2.2 Categorization of the OIF

Obligatory institutional fees constitute a set of rates and contributions that are extremely diversified, notably regarding the amount, the mode of collection and the destination of the amounts collected. In order to manipulate the concept effectively, it will be useful to us to define certain categories of fees in order to be able to distinctly discuss different realities. In the course of their studies, FACUM (2007, pp. 7-8) and Statistics Canada (1995-2008) privilege a breakdown according to the use of amounts; other authors (Gougeon, 2003; Desrosiers, 2002) adopt a subdivision by mode of collection. Our subdivisions will be based on the latter principle: Automatic billing fees per term: these are all the fees that appear each term on a bill of tuition fees. They can represent a uniform amount, a different amount for full-time students and part-time students or even an amount per credit. One-time automatic billing fee: these are fees that appear on a bill of tuition fees or that are paid on use, but that the student cannot avoid in the normal course of his studies. We think for example of admission application fees, diploma fees or again of internship fees (when the latter is obligatory for the obtainment of the coveted degree). Fee billed on use: this category includes all the fees whose imposition results in a decision or an act taken by a student. This category includes fees for the issuance of a transcript, for a revision of marks, a demand for equivalence, etc. Furthermore, we will also distinguish fees according to their scope, namely the range of the group of students affected: University scope: Fees that apply to all students of an institution or all students of a level of studies in a given institution. Faculty scope: Fees that apply to all the students of a faculty. Specific scope: Includes departmental fees, modular, relative to a program or a course in particular. There does not exist in Quebec, aside from tuition fees, any example of fee of a provincial scope, namely a fee that applies uniformly to all students of the university network. The amounts for copyright, for example, are negotiated for all institutions between the CRPUQ and Copibec, but each institution decides, or not, to make it an OIF. Finally, there is a certain coordination between the institutions of the Universit du Qubec network, but the policies differ from one institution to the next. 2.3
2.3.1

History
Non-regulated fees to circumvent the tuition fee freeze

Since the implementation of the recommendations of the report of the Royal Commission of Inquiry on Education in the Province of Quebec (commonly called the Parent Report),
Notice on The Regulation of Obligatory Institutional Fees Fdration tudiante universitaire du Qubec - 2011

published in 1963 and 1964, the government of Quebec regulates the tuition fees required by universities. It does this through budgetary rules that determine subsidies, that stipulate when there is a case of billing of an amount higher to that dictated by these same rules, the annual operating grant of an institution at fault can be adjusted so as to penalize it (MELS, 2008c, p. 33). However, universities have always had the possibility of requiring contributions for auxiliary services (to finance student services, for example). Furthermore, in 1986, the minister of Education, Claude Ryan, established ancillary fees, that institutions could impose without seeing their subsidies amputated. By doing this, the government granted a new source of income to universities, while maintaining a faade of a virtuous tuition fee freeze (FEUQ, 1996, p. 7). We now know that this freeze was in any case destined for an imminent death, since the same Liberal government decreed beginning in 1989 substantial increases in tuition fees; these went from $547 to $1,668 per year (for 30 credits), between 1989 and 1994 (CRPUQ, 2006, p. 67). In 1992, the FEUQ officially positioned itself for a law regulating tuition fees and others. Two motivations are at the source of this demand. The first comes from the fact that the regulation concerning tuition fees and OIF is determined by decree, without the obligation of holding prior consultations or a vote or discussion in the National Assembly. The second comes from the uniformity need of tuition fees (that then varied between $41.00 and $45.40 per credit) and writing fees (oscillating between $25 at Sherbrooke and $151 at the cole Polytechnique). It is also to be noted that the ministry then authorized universities to bill up until 10% more than regulated tuition fees which is not without reminding us of the current regulation applied to foreign students. Introduced under diverse pretexts, fees other than tuition fees increased regularly, attaining an average of $228 in 1995-96 (Statistics Canada, 1995-2008). In April 1996, the FEUQ submits to the attention of the Minister of Education, Pauline Marois, a notice asking for the adoption of a framework law on tuition fees and financial assistance to students, in order to make more rigorous and transparent the process of the modification of parameters of the student contribution and student financial assistance. In this notice, the FEUQ affirms that all fees required from the student that are directly related to studies are in reality tuition fees and that the possible framework-law should define the collection of all fees other than tuition fee, such as material fees or ancillary fees, as well as administrative fees (FEUQ, 1996, p. 14). This request nevertheless remained a dead letter and the fees other than tuition fees continued to increase in a rapid manner. A new study, conducted by the FEUQ in 2002, revealed that these grew annually by 9.32% between 1993-94 and 2000-01, making increase by 10.4% the overall bill of university students during this period, despite the freeze in tuition fees decreed in 1994 (FEUQ, 2002a, pp. 14-15). In its analysis, the FEUQ identified five factors that made the situation of non-regulated fees particularly problematic:

Notice on The Regulation of Obligatory Institutional Fees Fdration tudiante universitaire du Qubec - 2011

Table 1 Problematic factors applicable to the situation of non-regulated fees

Decentralization

University administrations do not have a complete and updated list of the fees that are required from students and the decisional power over these fees is managed by numerous and different administrative services: faculties, departments, student services and others. The fees are numerous and imaginative. The fees required by universities are not often the same from one university to the other, when it is not from one department to the next. Various fees that were not billed were then subsequently billed since other services imagined these new fees, creating a sort of unhealthy emulation between services and between universities. The vocabulary used by administrations is not always the same from one institution to the next and when it is, it often designates different realities. The changes in the student bill are collected from year to year, and sometimes fees change during the academic year.

Variety Incoherent classification Rapid evolution Absence de Transparency

Les dcisions relatives aux frais affrents sont prises dans des circonstances opaques et les justifications avances la cration de ces frais sont souvent trs Slender or derisory. Source : (FEUQ, 2002a, p. 13)

Following the conclusions of this study, the FEUQ returned with an attack with a demand to form a Law on Accessibility and Success in Postsecondary Studies. The adoption of this law, which would affect both the modalities of student financial assistance, the tuition fee freeze for Quebec, out-of-province and international students, the regulation of automatic fees imposed by educational institutions, was one of the main demands of students for the Quebec electoral campaign of 2003 (FEUQ, 2003a). Probably with the goal of avoiding the application of a constraining regulation, university administrations, through the CRPUQ, then committed to respecting two principles during the fixation of ancillary fees:
the transparency of institutional policies and practices concerning them. Prior to all changes in the matter, the consultation of student associations. (Excerpt from a letter by Pierre Lucier, president of the CRPUQ, to Sylvain Simard, ministre dtat lducation de lEmploi, February 21, 2003)

These promises of the CRPUQ do not however prevent the Quebec Liberal Party (QLP), not the Parti Qubcois (PQ) from committing in favor of a limitation of ancillary fees required from universities by a framework-law. After the election of a majority Liberal government on April 24, 2003, there only remains the task of obtaining the accomplishment of this commitment. In the months that follow the election, the FEUQ itself undertakes the writing of a framework-law project (FEUQ, 2003c) and uses the forums that are offered to it to remind the government of its electoral commitment, notably on the occasion of the Consultation gnrale sur les enjeux entourant la qualit, l'accessibilit et le financement des universits au Qubec, held by the Education Commission of the National Assembly during the first months of 2004 (FEUQ, 2003b, p. 57). In its final report following the consultation, the Education Commission recommends the adoption of a framework-law aiming at guaranteeing accessibility to postsecondary studies that would regulate all fees required from students by institutions (Commission de l'ducation, 2004, p. 46). In an
Notice on The Regulation of Obligatory Institutional Fees Fdration tudiante universitaire du Qubec - 2011

initiative notice published in May 2004, the Comit consultatif sur laccessibilit financire aux tudes (CCAFE) recommends the implementation of a mechanism protecting the student from possible sudden and significant increases of tuition fees and other obligatory fees (CCAFE, 2004, p. 49). To follow up on the electoral commitment of the QLP, the ministry of Education creates a tripartite committee made up of university representatives, the FEUQ and MELS. Several meetings of the committee were held during 2004 and gave way to a complete update of the data collated by MELS concerning the fees imposed by universities. Nevertheless, due to positions diametrically opposed to that of the CREPUQ and the FEUQ, no concrete result emerged from the work of the committee. We can also think of the political context of the year 2004-2005, marked by a major campaign of the student movement against the cuts to student financial assistance, which counts for something. The electoral commitment of 2003 in favor of the framework-law will never be held, so much so that the FEUQ must reiterate the demand for the Quebec electoral campaign of February-March 2007. This time, the QLP commits to (regulating and limiting) ancillary, accessory and technological fees, after discussions with student associations and institutions. (PLQ, 2007, p. 30).
2.3.2 Defreeze of tuition fees and the regulation of OIF

Following the reelection of the Liberal government, March 26, 2007, the Minister of Education, Recreation and Sports, Michelle Courchesne, proceeds on June 28 to announce in three points: The annual increase, from 2007 to 2012, of $3.33 per credit ($100 per year for a student enrolled at 30 credits) An improvement of student financial assistance, notably to lessen the impact of the increase in tuition fees. The holding of consultations online aiming to elaborate a proposal for the regulation of obligatory institutional fees (OIF). (MELS, 2007a) For the said consultation, held over a period of six weeks, the participants can submit their point of view by filling out a questionnaire online or by submitting a study via the MELS Website. Some twenty organizations chose to submit a study, including a large number of student associations.2 On the other hand, the individual contributions submitted thanks to a form online were not made public and thus cannot be analyzed. The student organizations were unanimous in demanding a regulation of obligatory institutional fees, with some of them even requiring their complete abolition, within a perspective of free education. One of the main problems underlined is the lack of transparency of university administrations when the time comes to justify the variation in obligatory institutional fees. Most associations thus require that institutions be held to justify the use of amounts before their students and obtain their backing prior to any modification. Two associations suggest that this backing be obtained by a referendum
2

The studies submitted for the consultations on obligatory institutional fees are available on the Website: http://www.mels.gouv.qc.ca/consultation/index.asp?page=memoiresDeposes. Notice on The Regulation of Obligatory Institutional Fees Fdration tudiante universitaire du Qubec - 2011

from the student population, while others recommend the approval of agreements (between the institution and the association representative of students) by the decisional mode of each student association. The four labor organizations that participated in the consultation3 pronounced in favor of a closer regulation of obligatory institutional fees, three of them expressly recommending the adoption of a law to this effect. In their studies, the labor organizations have also made the link between financial pressures exerted on universities and the proliferation of ancillary fees. They insist on the necessity of preserving financial accessibility to university studies and to prove transparency in the fixing of these fees. They also oppose that these ancillary fees be required for elements that are already the object of public subsidies and insist on the consultation of student associations in the process of fixing fees. Without surprise, the CREPUQ and the Universit Laval, while reiterating their commitments regarding transparency and the consultation of student associations, were opposed to the putting in place of a tighter regulation, pointing out that the services offered in universities must be adopted to the particularities of the specific needs of their clientele, that the range of services offered must be able to evolve according to needs and that it is normal that such services are financed by institutional fees (CRPUQ, 2007). Finally, following this consultation, the Minister of Education, Recreation and Sports, Mme Michelle Courchesne, announced on February 15, 2008, the putting in place of orientations destined for the regulation of obligatory institutional fees (which will be detailed in section 3).
2.3.3 Evolution of ancillary fees in time

When the time comes to quantitatively evaluating the evolution of ancillary fees in time, two main approaches can be used. The first consists of relating the total income collected by universities as OIF and student population in order to establish the means. This method has the advantage of taking into account the fees of all the categories that we have given ourselves, but that mask the diverse realities of each institution, program and level of studies. This is the technique that is used by MELS for the regulatory supervision of OIF, to decide the position of each institution in the regulatory grid (MELS, 2008c, p. 30). The other method consists of establishing typical-student profiles (for example, a student enrolled in 15 credits per term, at the bachelors, in the autumn and winter, in a given institution) and to calculate, for each of these fictive students throughout the year in each institution. This approach allows us to faithfully follow the financial expenses of a student, is very efficient to account for fees to bill automatically per term and one-item fees, but tend to obscure the fees billed for use (for example we can with difficulty forecast the number of copies of transcripts that a student will demand during the course of a term). In its Tuition and Living Accommodation Costs for Full-time Students at
3

Confdration des syndicats nationaux (CSN), Centrale des syndicats du Qubec (CSQ), Fdration nationale des enseignantes et des enseignants du Qubec (FNEEQ-CSN) et Fdration qubcoises des professeures et professeurs duniversit (FQPPU) Notice on The Regulation of Obligatory Institutional Fees Fdration tudiante universitaire du Qubec - 2011

Canadian Degree-granting Institutions, Statistics Canada proceeded thus, with the help of a questionnaire sent to each university institution (Statistique Canada, 1995-2008). In the framework of this notice, we will use successively two methods. Evaluation according to incomes For the regulatory supervision of the OIF, in order to classify the institutions in the grid, MELS established an average of OIF per FTE, by taking into account the income enrolled in the financial report of universities under three accounting items (MELS, 2008c, p. 30): Student fees; Admissions, registrations, fees, internship or supervision fees; Sales to students. Following the same logic, it is possible to retrace, at the Quebec level, the amounts collected according to these rubrics:
Table 2 - Evolution of university revenues collected as obligatory institutional fees

97-98
Admission, registration and other fees ($M) Student fees (M$) Sales to students (M$) Total OIF (M$) Student population Total OIF / Student ($) Annual growth 18,8 25,1 13,8 57,7 224592 256,91

98-99
23,2 26,6 18,2 68 224252 303,23 18,03%

99-00
31,8 28,1 28,6 88,5 229527 385,58 27,16%

00-01
37,5 29,7 34,7 101,9 231135 440,87 14,34%

01-02
39,1 32,4 47,4 118,9 236726 502,27 13,93%

02-03
37,2 35,2 60,3 132,7 246800 537,68 7,05%

03-04
45,4 38,7 58,6 142,7 255853 557,74 3,73%

04-05
47,3 39,7 71,5 158,5 259045 611,86 9,70%

05-06
53,2 43,6 68,4 165,2 261467 631,82 3,26%

06-07
58,9 46,6 75,2 180,7 262142 689,32 9,10%

Source : (MELS, 2003-2008)

Table 2 presents a cumulative growth of 168,3% of incomes per students collected by universities according to three budgetary items used by MELS to determine the average OIF between 1997-98 and 2006-07. In comparison, the Canadian consumer price index rose 21.5% between 1997 and 2006 (Banque du Canada, 2006). It would be interesting to know if such hikes have allowed for the creation of new services or the improvement of existing services, but this is not the proposal of this notice. Evaluation of the fees declared by institution It is also possible to observe the evolution of OIF by basing ourselves on the data published by Statistics Canada. For the purposes of this study, the organization annually sends a questionnaire to each of the institutions targeted, asking them to declare the supplementary fees required by undergraduate and graduate students. The amounts for each institution are then published on the basis of two terms of study (or 30 credits), as well as the weighted averages for each province. The evolution of Quebec averages published by Statistics Canada is presented in Table 3. These data are however to be used with caution, since the notion of supplementary fees of Statistics Canada
Notice on The Regulation of Obligatory Institutional Fees Fdration tudiante universitaire du Qubec - 2011

differs from that of OIF (the supplementary include the dues of student associations and exclude one-time automatic fees and fees billed on use).
Table 3 - Evolution of the Quebec average of supplementary fees (according to the definition of Statistics Canada)

93-94 Undergraduate Graduate studies Average Growth 205 234 209

94-95 156 192 162 -22,67%

95-96 219 270 228 40,62%

96-97 218 260 225 -1,02%

97-98 272 320 281 24,61%

98-99 327 339 329 17,26%

99-00 345 383 352 6,83%

00-01 387 444 396 12,72%

Undergraduate Graduate studies Average Growth Undergraduate Graduate studies Average

01-02 426 475 434 9,53% 09-10 615 554 602

02-03 491 519 496 14,17% 10-11p 633 573 621

03-04 522 549 526 6,20%

04-05 544 563 548 4,00%

05-06 596 620 600 9,49%

06-07r 574 615 558 -7,00%

07-08r 619 653 626 12,19%

08-09 602 717 603 -3,67%

Growth -0,17% 3,16% Source : (Statistique Canada, 1995-2008) Note : les donnes pour 2008-09 incluent des estims pour certaines universits dont les frais rels navaient pas t fixs au moment de lenqute. De plus, les donnes pour lannes 10-11 sont aussi des donnes prliminaires. Par ailleurs, les donnes concernant les annes 06-07 et 07-08 sont des donnes rvises selon une nouvelle grille de calcul. Finalement, les donnes 09-10 et 10-11 ont fait lobjet de changement mthodologique puisque les frais chargs pour certaines assurances ont t retirs du calcul.

In the same manner as for the evolution based on the income sources, we observe here a growth of the amounts required largely superior to the consumer price index. From 1993-94 to 2008-09, the Quebec average increased by 211.5%, namely an average of 7.87% per year. Over the same period, Canadian consumer price index had inflation of 34,19%, or again 1.98% annually (Banque du Canada, 2006). If the growth seems weaker for 2008-2009, we have to remind ourselves that the data of Statistics Canada available at the time of writing are preliminary. 2.4 State of the situation from 2007 to 2010

In order to understand the recent evolution of obligatory institutional fees and to be able to observe the first effects of the application of the budgetary regulation of the OIF, a survey of the automatic fees per term was made with the assistance of data provided by universities. With the help of information on institutional policies on the web sites of universities or obtained by contacting them directly, the amount of fees has been calculated for three different student profiles:

Notice on The Regulation of Obligatory Institutional Fees Fdration tudiante universitaire du Qubec - 2011

Student registered at the bachelors full-time (15 credits in the autumn, 15 credits in winter) Student enrolled in graduate studies full-time (15 credits in the autumn, 15 credits in winter) Student enrolled in the status of writing a masters or doctoral thesis (full-time) The following three tables present the total of fees billed for a university year in each institution according to three profiles The detail of the fees considered is available in the appendix. In each of these tables, certain institutions present annual hikes superior to $15, $25 or $50 for these profiles of student-types. In the case where the hike is higher than the limit imposed for the university, it is necessary to see if the agreement between management and the student association before concluding that there is an infraction of the regulation.
Table 4 Automatic fees billed to a student enrolled full-time in the bachelors (30 credits / year), according to the year of attendance and institution.

200708 Bishops Concordi a NAP ETS HEC INRS Laval McGill Poly Sherbroo ke UdeM UQAC UQAM UQAR UQAT 761,0 0$ 836,5 0$ - $ 313,0 0$ 820,8 0$ - $ 428,1 0$ 912,7 0$ 400,0 0$ 396,9 0$ 372,3 0$ 372,5 0$ 384,1 4$ 330,3 0$ 324,9 0$

2008 -09 781,4 0$ 851,8 0$ - $ 346,0 0$ 859,9 0$ - $ 477,6 0$ 956,3 0$ 420,0 0$ 404,4 0$ 423,9 0$ 377,9 8$ 387,9 6$ 335,2 2$ 329,4 0$

200910p 938,4 0$ 855,7 0$ - $ 346,0 0$ 882,3 8$ - $ 499,5 6$ 993,0 0$ 455,3 0$ 412,5 0$ 482,7 0$ 382,3 8$ 406,9 0$ 342,2 3$ 364,4 0$

2010 2011 p 958,3 0$ 879,9 2$ - $ 378,5 0$ 958,3 0$ - $ 524,4 6$ 996,0 0$ 480,3 0$ 475,0 8$ 511,3 5$ 383,7 8 $ 433,6 0 $ 394,9 0 $ 400,0 0 $

Variatio n (07-08 08-09) 20,40 $ 15,30 $ - $ 33,00 $ 39,10 $ - $ 49,50 $ 43,60 $ 20,00 $ 7,50 $ 51,60 $ 5,48 $ 3,82 $ 4,92 $ 4,50 $

Variatio n (08-09 09-10) 157,00 $ 3,90 $ - $ - $ 22,48 $ - $ 21,96 $ 36,70 $ 35,30 $ 8,10 $ 58,80 $ 4,40 $ 18,94 $ 7,01 $ 35,00 $

Variati on (0910 1011) 19,90 $ 24,22 $ - $ 32,50 $ 75,92 $ - $ 24,90 $ 3,00 $ 25,00 $ 62,58 $ 28,75 $ 1,40 $ 26,70 $ 52,67 $ 35,60 $

Notice on The Regulation of Obligatory Institutional Fees Fdration tudiante universitaire du Qubec - 2011

UQO UQTR Moyenne * Croissanc e

403,1 0$ 346,1 0$ 533,5 0$

405,2 0$ 356,3 8$ 562,5 7$ 5,45 %

406,7 0$ 358,8 2$ 589,6 2$ 4,81 %

422,3 0 $ 359,9 6 $ 624,2 5 $ 4,56 %

2,10 $ 10,28 $ 29,07 $

1,50 $ 2,44 $ 27,05 $

15,60 $ 1,14 $ 25,20 $

2007-08 Bishops Concordia NAP ETS HEC INRS Laval McGill Poly Sherbrooke UdeM UQAC UQAM UQAR UQAT UQO UQTR Average * Growth 761,00 $ 836,50 $ - $ 313,00 $ 820,80 $ - $ 428,10 $ 912,70 $ 400,00 $ 396,90 $ 372,30 $ 372,50 $ 384,14 $ 330,30 $ 324,90 $ 403,10 $ 346,10 $ 533,50 $

2008-09 781,40 $ 851,80 $ - $ 346,00 $ 859,90 $ - $ 477,60 $ 956,30 $ 420,00 $ 404,40 $ 423,90 $ 377,98 $ 387,96 $ 335,22 $ 329,40 $ 405,20 $ 356,38 $ 562,57 $ 5,45%

200910p 938,40 $ 855,70 $ - $ 346,00 $ 882,38 $ - $ 499,56 $ 993,00 $ 455,30 $ 412,50 $ 482,70 $ 382,38 $ 406,90 $ 342,23 $ 364,40 $ 406,70 $ 358,82 $ 589,62 $ 4,81%

2010- 2011p

958,30 $ 879,92 $ - $ 378,50 $ 958,30 $ - $ 524,46 $ 996,00 $ 480,30 $ 475,08 $ 511,35 $ 383,78 $ 433,60 $ 394,90 $ 400,00 $ 422,30 $ 359,96 $ 624,25 $ 4,56%

Variati on (07-08 to 0809) 20,40 $ 15,30 $ - $ 33,00 $ 39,10 $ - $ 49,50 $ 43,60 $ 20,00 $ 7,50 $ 51,60 $ 5,48 $ 3,82 $ 4,92 $ 4,50 $ 2,10 $ 10,28 $ 29,07 $

Variati on (08-09 to 0910) 157,00 $ 3,90 $ - $ - $ 22,48 $ - $ 21,96 $ 36,70 $ 35,30 $ 8,10 $ 58,80 $ 4,40 $ 18,94 $ 7,01 $ 35,00 $ 1,50 $ 2,44 $ 27,05 $

Variati on (0910 to 10-11) 19,90 $ 24,22 $ - $ 32,50 $ 75,92 $ - $ 24,90 $ 3,00 $ 25,00 $ 62,58 $ 28,75 $ 1,40 $ 26,70 $ 52,67 $ 35,60 $ 15,60 $ 1,14 $ 25,20 $

Note: Pour les fins de calcul de la moyenne, les donnes ont t pondres en fonction des effectifs de premier cycle prvus par le MELS pour chaque tablissement (MELS, 2008, CREPUQ 2010a). Les donnes prsentes pour lanne 2009-2010 et 2010-2011 sont prliminaires.
Table 5 Automatic fees billed to a student enrolled full-time in graduate studies (30 credits / year), according to the year of attendance and institution.

2007-08 Bishops Concordia NAP -$ 836,50 $ 257,60 $

2008-09 -$ 851,80 $ 269,60 $

2009-10p -$ 855,70 $ 281,60 $

2010- 2011p -$ 879,92 $ 281,60 $

Variation (07-08 08-09) -$ 15,30 $ 12,00 $

Variation (08-09 09-10) -$ 3,90 $ 12,00 $

Variation (09-10 10-11) -$ 24,22 $ 0,00 $

Notice on The Regulation of Obligatory Institutional Fees Fdration tudiante universitaire du Qubec - 2011

ETS HEC INRS Laval McGill Poly Sherbrooke UdeM UQAC UQAM UQAR UQAT (Profil B) UQO UQTR Moyenne * Croissance

313,00 $ 603,04 $ 131,10 $ 428,10 $ 912,70 $ 400,00 $ 396,90 $ 372,30 $ 372,50 $ 384,14 $ 330,30 $ 444,90 $ 403,70 $ 346,10 $ 513,94 $

346,00 $ 624,94 $ 131,10 $ 477,60 $ 956,30 $ 420,00 $ 404,40 $ 423,90 $ 377,98 $ 387,96 $ 335,22 $ 449,40 $ 405,20 $ 356,38 $ 542,91 $ 5,64%

346,00 $ 640,52 $ 131,10 $ 499,56 $ 968,00 $ 455,30 $ 412,50 $ 482,70 $ 382,38 $ 406,90 $ 342,23 $ 484,40 $ 406,70 $ 358,38 $ 564,80 $ 4,03% 2009-10p -$ 855,70 $ 281,60 $ 346,00 $ 640,52 $ 131,10 $ 499,56 $ 968,00 $ 455,30 $ 412,50 $ 482,70 $ 382,38 $ 406,90 $ 342,23 $ 484,40 $ 406,70 $ 358,38 $ 564,80 $

378,50 $ 710,84 $ 180,00 $ 524,46 $ 971,00 $ 480,30 $ 473,28 $ 511,35 $ 383,78 $ 433,60 $ 394,90 $ 550,00 $ 422,30 $ 359,82 $ 603,50 $ 5,33% 2010- 2011p -$ 879,92 $ 281,60 $ 378,50 $ 710,84 $ 180,00 $ 524,46 $ 971,00 $ 480,30 $ 473,28 $ 511,35 $ 383,78 $ 433,60 $ 394,90 $ 550,00 $ 422,30 $ 359,82 $ 603,50 $

33,00 $ 21,90 $ -$ 49,50 $ 43,60 $ 20,00 $ 7,50 $ 51,60 $ 5,48 $ 3,82 $ 4,92 $ 4,50 $ 1,50 $ 10,28 $ 26,70 $

-$ 15,58 $ -$ 21,96 $ 11,70 $ 35,30 $ 8,10 $ 58,80 $ 4,40 $ 18,94 $ 7,01 $ 35,00 $ 1,50 $ 2,00 $ 21,89 $

32,50 $ 70,32 $ 48,90 $ 24,90 $ 3,00 $ 25,00 $ 60,78 $ 28,65 $ 1,40 $ 26,70 $ 52,67 $ 65,60 $ 15,60 $ 1,44 $ 29,68 $

2007-08 Bishops Concordia NAP ETS HEC INRS Laval McGill Poly Sherbrooke UdeM UQAC UQAM UQAR UQAT (Profil B) UQO UQTR Average * -$ 836,50 $ 257,60 $ 313,00 $ 603,04 $ 131,10 $ 428,10 $ 912,70 $ 400,00 $ 396,90 $ 372,30 $ 372,50 $ 384,14 $ 330,30 $ 444,90 $ 403,70 $ 346,10 $ 513,94 $

2008-09 -$ 851,80 $ 269,60 $ 346,00 $ 624,94 $ 131,10 $ 477,60 $ 956,30 $ 420,00 $ 404,40 $ 423,90 $ 377,98 $ 387,96 $ 335,22 $ 449,40 $ 405,20 $ 356,38 $ 542,91 $

Variation (07-08 to 08-09) -$ 15,30 $ 12,00 $ 33,00 $ 21,90 $ -$ 49,50 $ 43,60 $ 20,00 $ 7,50 $ 51,60 $ 5,48 $ 3,82 $ 4,92 $ 4,50 $ 1,50 $ 10,28 $ 26,70 $

Variation (08-09 to 09-10) -$ 3,90 $ 12,00 $ -$ 15,58 $ -$ 21,96 $ 11,70 $ 35,30 $ 8,10 $ 58,80 $ 4,40 $ 18,94 $ 7,01 $ 35,00 $ 1,50 $ 2,00 $ 21,89 $

Variation (09-10 to 10-11) -$ 24,22 $ 0,00 $ 32,50 $ 70,32 $ 48,90 $ 24,90 $ 3,00 $ 25,00 $ 60,78 $ 28,65 $ 1,40 $ 26,70 $ 52,67 $ 65,60 $ 15,60 $ 1,44 $ 29,68 $

Notice on The Regulation of Obligatory Institutional Fees Fdration tudiante universitaire du Qubec - 2011

Growth

5,64%

4,03%

5,33%

HEC: les montants prsents sont ceux de la matrise. Les montants exigs au doctorat prsentent des diffrences infrieures 1 $/anne. Note : Pour les fins de calcul de la moyenne, les donnes ont t pondres en fonction des effectifs de 2 e et 3e cycles prvus par le MELS pour chaque tablissement (MELS, 2008b et CREPUQ 2010a). Les donnes prsentes pour lanne 2009-2010 sont prliminaires. De plus, comme nous ne connaissons pas les diffrences deffectifs entre les profil A (professionnel) et les profil B (recherche) aux cycles suprieurs lUQAT, nous avons choisit le profil B afin de souligner limportante augmentation de FIO quils ont subit.

Table 6 Automatic fees billed to a student enrolled in the status of writing (full-time), according to the year of attendance and establishment.

2007-08 Bishops Concordia A Concordia B NAP ETS HEC MSc HEC PhD INRS Laval A Laval B McGill Poly Sherbrooke UdeM UQAC UQAM UQAR A UQAR B UQAT UQO UQTR -$ 840,00 $ 1 240,00 $ N/D 448,00 $ 1 389,80 $ 1 689,80 $ 421,10 $ 607,20 $ 1 059,20 $ 2 361,80 $ 1 726,15 $ 657,86 $ 624,00 $ 480,00 $ 680,00 $ 220,00 $ 480,00 $ 260,00 $ 220,00 $ 294,20 $

2008-09 -$ 840,00 $ 1 240,00 $ 695,40 $ 456,00 $ 1 410,96 $ 1 710,96 $ 701,10 $ 651,60 $ 1 103,60 $ 2 483,70 $ 1 821,08 $ 658,82 $ 674,00 $ 487,68 $ 694,96 $ 223,52 $ 487,68 $ 620,00 $ 220,00 $ 295,48 $
e

2009-10p -$ 840,00 $ 1 240,00 $ N/D 456,00 $ 1 431,26 $ 1 731,26 $ 731,10 $ 671,28 $ 1 123,28 $ 2 592,10 $ 1 856,38 $ 659,80 $ 699,00 $ 489,38 $ 725,30 $ 228,19 $ 497,87 $ 625,00 $ 220,00 $ 292,98 $

2010-2011p -$ 850,00 $ 1 250,00 $ 745,40 $ 478,50 $ 1 452,72 $ 1 752,72 $ 780,00 $ 692,16 $ 1 144,16 $ 2 593,10 $ 1 881,38 $ 664,78 $ 724,00 $ 489,38 $ 753,58 $ 201,72 $ 471,44 $ 1 050,00 $ 220,00 $ 293,22 $
e

Variation (07-08 to 08-09) -$ -$ -$ N/D 8,00 $ 21,16 $ 21,16 $ 280,00 $ 44,40 $ 44,40 $ 121,90 $ 94,93 $ 0,96 $ 50,00 $ 7,68 $ 14,96 $ 3,52 $ 7,68 $ 360,00 $ -$ 1,28 $

Variation (08-09 to 09-10) -$ -$ -$ N/D 0,00 $ 20,30 $ 20,30 $ 30,00 $ 19,68 $ 19,68 $ 108,40 $ 35,30 $ 0,98 $ 25,00 $ 1,70 $ 30,34 $ 4,67 $ 10,19 $ 5,00 $ -$ (2,50 $)

Variation (09-10 to 10-11) -$ 10,00 $ 10,00 $ N/D 22,50 $ 21,46 $ 21,46 $ 48,90 $ 20,88 $ 20,88 $ 1,00 $ 25,00 $ 4,98 $ 50,00 $ 0,00 $ 28,28 $ (26,47 $) (26,43 $) 425,00 $ 0,00 $ 0,24 $

Statut Concordia A : partir de la 7 session la matrise, 13 session au doctorat. Concordia B : partir de la 13e session la matrise, 19e session au doctorat. Laval A : partir de la 5e session la matrise, 9e session au doctorat. Laval B : partir de la 6e session la matrise, 11e session au doctorat. UQAR A : partir de la 4e session la matrise, 7e session au doctorat. UQAR B : partir de la 7e session la matrise, 10e session au doctorat. Les effectifs spcifiques aux tudiants en statut de rdaction ntant pas disponibles, il est impossible de calculer une moyenne pondre laide de ces donnes.

Notice on The Regulation of Obligatory Institutional Fees Fdration tudiante universitaire du Qubec - 2011

Analysis of the regulatory supervision of OIF

February 15, 2008, the Minister of Education, Recreation and Sports, Michelle Courchesne, announced her intention to put in place a regulation of obligatory institutional fees, which would be incorporated in the budgetary rules governing subsidies to universities, for a period of three years. (from 2008-09 to 2010-11) (MELS, 2008a). As set out in the Act respecting the Conseil suprieur de lducation, in the case of modifications made to the budgetary rules concerning tuition fees and ancillary fees, the minister must submit her regulatory project to the attention of the Comit consultatif sur laccessibilit financire aux tudes (CCAFE), in order to collect the notice of this committee. The notice of the CCAFE on the project of the regulation, published on April 11, 2008, clarified and specified numerous aspects. We will thus often make reference to it in the next section. 3.1 Interpretation of the budgetary rule

During the course of the first year of application, certain grey zones of regulation had to be made the object of clarifications. It seems opportune to make an assessment here to dissipate all uncertainty.
3.1.1 Individual application of the limits of the increase

The preliminary version of the regulation, submitted to the examination of the CCAFE, were ambiguous on the manner of applying the limits set out for each institution. Thus, the regulation could have been understood as limiting the growth of the average fees required by an institution or again as an individual protection benefiting each student. In this regard, the CCAFE obtained that this part of the regulation be clarified and mentions in its notice that it consists of an individual guarantee certifying to each student that the OIF he must pay for a given year will not increase more than $15, $25 or $50 the following year, according to the limit imposed on the institution (CCAFE, 2008, p. 7). To this end, it is still relevant that this interpretation of the rule remains as such, since it operates to protect the departments against each other and individuals against each other. For example, students of a particular department could have their OIF increase drastically while other departments would have their OIF stagnate, which would ensure that a university would increase its average OIF to the legal limit without all students having the right to services in return. It is preferable, within a view of equity across disciplines, to maintain this individual protection.
3.1.2 Limit applying to the summer term

About the summer term, the budgetary rules stipulate that the maximal increase applicable to the summer semester is equal to 50% of the annual authorized limit (MELS, 2008c, p. 30). However, there persists a certain confusion in regard to the manner of calculating the hike allowed for the summer. In order to clarify the situation, MELS has specified that the amount allowed for the summer term must be calculated on the basis of the amount required for the previous summer term and that the restrictions relative to the autumn and winter semesters and the summer term apply independently one from the other. Thus, an institution for which the allowable hike is $50 per year has the
Notice on The Regulation of Obligatory Institutional Fees Fdration tudiante universitaire du Qubec - 2011

possibility of applying this increase during the autumn and winter semesters and also to apply a hike of $25 during the summer semester (always in relation to the previous summer semester) (MELS, 2009). 3.2 Analysis of the budgetary rule

In order to conduct a critical analysis of the regulatory supervision of the OIF, we will try to respond to two fundamental questions: Is the regulation of a nature to fulfill the objectives targeted by the MELS during its implementation? Is the regulation of a nature to remedy the problematic factors of the situation of ancillary fees identified by the FEUQ? (see Table 1, p. 12)
3.2.1 In regard to the objectives fixed by MELS

The first question makes reference to the objectives fixed by MELS. These are cited in an explicit manner in the notice of the CCAFE:
Limit the increases in obligatory institutional fees in universities; Reduce the gaps in rate-fixing between universities in regard to obligatory institutional fees; Allow the conclusion of agreements between university institutions and student associations in regard to obligatory institutional fees. (CCAFE, 2008, p. 8)

Only a quantitative analysis of changes in OIF can judge the achievement of the first goal. In announcing the budget framework, the MELS predicted that it would limit the overall increase in OIF to 3.4% in 2008-09 and to 2.8% in 2009-2010 and 2.7% in 20092010 (MELS, 2008a), these rates are calculated from the mass of the amounts received by all institutions. The results obtained by this method of calculation are not yet known. However, according to our estimates based on the amounts required, the overall increases will be about 5.45%, 4.81% and 4.27% for the BA (see Table 4). 5.64%, 4.63% and 3.60% for graduate students (see Table 5). The growth in expenses would be significantly greater than that provided by the MELS. It is clear that the regulatory framework did not permit limiting the increases to the extent required by the MELS, at most, it succeeded in preventing some significant and unilateral increases. Note however that Bishop's University, in 2009-2010, presents a significant increase of OIF which could create some distortion. In its notice, the CCAFE already put in question the effectiveness of the regulation in regard to the reduction of gaps between institutions, observing that in the eventuality where all the institutions used the totality of the margin of manoeuvre offered to them ($15, $25 or $50 per year, according to the case), the most important gaps will only be reduced by $35 per year (CCAFE, 2008, p. 10). Furthermore, agreements between institutions already require high fees and the student associations can allow to exceed these limits. The data on the fees required compiled in this notice (see tables 4, 5 and 6) do not allow to state the narrowing of gaps. On the contrary, we observe that the more voracious institutions (Bishops, HEC, McGill, Laval, Montral) continue to proceed to
Notice on The Regulation of Obligatory Institutional Fees Fdration tudiante universitaire du Qubec - 2011

the highest hikes. The trend observed is thus towards the maintenance, even the enlargement of gaps rather than their reduction. Finally, the attainment of the latter objective can only be evaluated by observing the evolution of the number of agreements concluded and the number of students targeted by these agreements. Such an evaluation is difficult for these two reasons: Before the implementation of this regulatory supervision, the institutions were not required to transmit the content of these agreements to MELS, thus the inexistence of a centralized list. Since its implementation, it is possible that the agreements concluded, at the university, faculty or departmental levels, were not transmitted to MELS. This situation makes technically non-regulatory increases superior to the limits that are in place. However, given the presence of this clandestine agreement, it is improbable that the situation will be signaled. Given this state of facts, we will avoid pronouncing ourselves on the attainment of the third objective.
3.2.2 In regard to the preoccupations expressed by the FEUQ

In its analysis of 2002, the FEUQ expressed its concerns in regard to five problematic factors (see Table 1): decentralization, variety, incoherent classification, rapid evolution, absence of transparency. By making the directors of each institution responsible for its application on all the campus and requiring a deposit of an exhaustive list of fees required by each institution and its components (MELS, 2008c, p. 31), the regulatory supervision partially responds to the first preoccupation (decentralization). It nevertheless remains true that agreements can be concluded at the faculty or departmental level introducing disparities on the same campus, and that in the case where the directors of the institution choose not to use the totality of their margin of manoeuvre, unilateral increases remain possible on the part of certain services and educational units. To this end, we will see later, a case (3.5.1) regarding the matter. On the other hand, regulatory supervision does not bring any response to the concerns about the variety and the incoherent classification of fees. In fact, the limits imposed by the budgetary rule are based on a comparison between the amount of fees required from a student in a given year with the amount required the previous year. There is no mention made of the number of services or bodies empowered to require fees, anymore than their classification. Regulatory supervision partially responds to the preoccupation concerning the rapid and unpredictable evolution of fees. In fact, it forces institutions to submit, before the beginning of the university year covered by the budgetary rule4 and under the form prescribed by MELS, an official list off all the obligatory institutional fees that will be required by itself or one
4

In the sense of the budgetary rule, the beginning of the university year coincides with that of the summer semester (ex.: the 2008-2009 university year begins with the 2008 summer semester). Notice on The Regulation of Obligatory Institutional Fees Fdration tudiante universitaire du Qubec - 2011

of its components (MELS, 2008c, p. 31). In principle, the variation or the creation of new fees should no longer occur during the year, the logical consequence of this requirement being that the fees required from the student that are not part of the list submitted at the beginning of the year would be considered non-regulatory. In fact, regulation has the effect of bringing the moment of the fixing of costs to the beginning of the university year. Finally, regulatory supervision imposes more transparence in regard to the fixing of costs and the use of generated resources, but there are still grey zones. Thus, the process of negotiation of an agreement normally allows the student association to require complete information on the motives of variations. However, in the case of increases lower than limits imposed, decisions can continue to be made without clearly exposing the motives. 3.3 General problems of the application of the rule

One year after the coming into force of regulatory supervision, certain general problems of application appeared and merit a more in-depth reflection in order to find solutions and allow each of the actors to find themselves.
3.3.1 Uncertainty concerning the limit imposed on each university

The first application problem concerns the necessary delay to establish the position of the institution in the supervision grid of OIF. According to the rule, the increase allowed per student for year N is determined based on the revenues collected on the basis of OIF for year N-1 (for example, the hike allowed in 2008-09 is based on the revenues of 200708). Now, these data are contained in the financial statements that are only published several months after the end of the financial year in question.5 In fact, the budgetary rules require the transmission of the annual report for September 30 following the end of the financial year (MELS, 2008c, p. 38). For example, during the prior consultations to its notice held in February 2008, the CCAFE only obtained from the MELS that the provisional data regarding the situation of the institution for the following year (CCAFE, 2008, p. 6). Since writing the first draft of this notice, it was impossible to obtain FEUQ MELS final data on the position of institutions in the grid for the year 2008-09 and 2009-2010. A problem follows not only for institutions in the process of the development of policies concerning obligatory institutional fees, but also for student associations, that are called to negotiate agreements on obligatory institutional fees without knowing the situation of their institution regarding regulatory supervision.

For example, the financial statements of the Universit de Montral for the 2006-07 financial year, which end on May 31, 2007, are dated September 14, 2007 (UdeM, 2007). Notice on The Regulation of Obligatory Institutional Fees Fdration tudiante universitaire du Qubec - 2011

Table 7 Grid framework for obligatory fees

University institutions whose OIF * Are below 555 $/year Are between 555 $ and 699 $/year Sont suprieurs 699 $/year MELS (2009a)

Increase permitted by students per year

Increase permitted by students for the following summer term 25,00 $ 12,50 $ 7,50 $

50,00 $ 25,00 $ 15,00 $

3.3.2

Non-obligatory automatic contributions (NOAC)

There exists in most institutions a certain number of non-obligatory automatic contributions destined to finance a multitude of entities and services, established sometimes by student groups, sometimes by institutions. The principle is simple: the amount appears on the bill of the tuition fees of the student each semester and he must follow certain steps (often an online form or a paper version) to make him remove it or to obtain a reimbursement. This at first sight consists of an elegant solution, since the student who does not have the means to make the contribution or who doe not see its relevance can easily refuse to do so. By way of indication, Table presents a nonexhaustive survey of NOAC currently collected by Quebec universities:
Table 8 Non-obligatory automatic contributions collected by universities (Autumn 2009)

Institution NAP ETS ETS HEC Poly (Bacc.) UdeM (Bacc.) UdeM (C.S.) UdeM UdeM UdeM UdeM UQAC UQAM UQAR

Type Fondation universitaire Fondation universitaire Fonds de projets tudiants Fondation universitaire Fonds de projets tudiants Ancillary fees Ancillary fees Ancillary fees Student group Student group Student group Fondation universitaire Student group Fondation universitaire

Name Fonds de dv. de l'UQ Fonds de dv. de l'ETS Fonds de dv. durable Campagne de financement Fonds dappui aux initiatives tudiantes Technological fees Technological fees Fonds d'aml. de la vie tudiante Drop-in daycare Le Baluchon Journal Le Quartier Libre Radio tudiante CISM Campagne de financement Radio tudiante CHOQ-FM Campagne majeure Fondation UQAR

Amount 2$ / credit 15$ / term 5$ / term 0,75$ / credit 10$ / term 8$ / credit 120$ / term 25$ / term 2,50$ / term 1,50$ / term 2$ / term 15$ / term 2,25$ / term 15$ / term

Notice on The Regulation of Obligatory Institutional Fees Fdration tudiante universitaire du Qubec - 2011

Institution UQAR UQO UQTR

Type Fonds de projets tudiants Fondation universitaire Fondation universitaire

Name Fonds de soutien aux projets tudiants Fondation de l'UQO Campagne majeure Fondation UQTR Fondation UQTR

Amount 10$ / term 7,50$ / term 10$ / term 5$ / term

UQTR Fondation universitaire Source : Sites web des universits

On the other hand, certain problems can occur in regard to the payment modalities and removal related to contributions. Firstly, in the case where the modalities of the contribution make it such that the student must first pay the amount, then take steps to obtain a reimbursement, there can be a problem of availability of capital if it is a substantial amount. In fact, the student must first procure the required funds to pay, in the first place, his contribution. The second problem met concerns the modalities of withdrawal related to NOACs. To really respect the principle of a NOAC, it is imperative that the student benefit from the necessary information to make an informed choice and that the reimbursement modalities make this accessible. In reaction to the modifications made unilaterally by the university administration to the withdrawal procedures,6 the Ombudsman of the Universit de Montral wrote:
According to my point of view, essentially, a non-obligatory contribution, or a gift, in regard to the fund for the improvement of student life, must be made in a voluntary manner and with full knowledge of the cause by those who subscribe to it. In this sense, it is up to the university administration to act in a more transparent manner in regard to these students, when contributions are billed in an automatic way, by clearly announcing, which fees are obligatory and which are voluntary. In regard to voluntary fees, it appears to me more than essential that their abandonment modalities are effective and accessible for all students, that they be clearly announced, and that we give to students a sufficient timeframe to exercise their right of withdrawal. The abandonment modalities, in person only, without possibility of proxy, poses a serious obstacle in my opinion to freedom of choice of students to subscribe or not to the contributions in question. Whether we think of handicapped students, to those having reduced mobility, those that study at a distance, those that are in internships abroad, those that have diverse occupations, such as professional engagements or other, prevents them from traveling at the appointed times for abandonment in person. (Descary, 2009)

Consequently, the imposition of non-obligatory automatic contributions is an acceptable solution only in cases where the principles of transparency and accessibility to withdrawal modalities are respected. It is up to the institutions desiring to introduce such fees to prove they respect these principles. In the case where the institution is

Beginning with the summer semester of 2009, the Universit de Montral had passed the amount of the technological fees from $4.00 to $8.00/credit, removed the maximum limit on the number of credits (formerly fifteen maximum) in the calculation of the NOAC and abandoned the procedure of the withdrawal online replacing it with a procedure that obliged students to present themselves in at the registrars office during opening hours. (Descary, 2009) Notice on The Regulation of Obligatory Institutional Fees Fdration tudiante universitaire du Qubec - 2011

incapable of proving its good faith, a ministerial intervention concerning the NOAC would have to be considered.
3.3.3 Fees for the writing of masters and doctoral theses

The applicable budgetary rules for universities link tuition fees to the notion of the unity of courses (currently called credits), which represent a certain number of hours of participation in teaching activities. Now, the structure of masters and doctoral programs make it such that institutions have developed a rate-fixing that rests on the distribution of credits of a program over a number of arbitrary semesters, designated as the normal duration of the program. When the student has exceeded this limit, habitually because he is pursuing research or writing activities related to his masters or doctoral thesis, he falls under a new status, that bear different names according to the institution: writing, research, prolongation of studies additional session, non-thesis extension, continuation, time-limit extension, etc. A definite amount according to the policies of the university is then charged to him, with the designation varying as well: Tuition * Tuition fees * Fees for the maintenance of registration Registration fees Continuation Fee Time-Limit Extension Fee Tuition Fee * We easily understand that the terms marked by asterisks are misleading since the budgetary rules reserve the designation tuition fees to rates that are defined in articles 3.1, 3.4 and 3.6 (respectively tuition fees required from student residents of Quebec, nonresidents of Quebec and foreigners). Up until 2007-08, the budgetary rules at article 3.3 Other fees stipulate that: university institutions determine the rates applicable to students that are writing their thesis or masters thesis (MELS, 2007b, p. 23). Despite the explicit mention of the reduction of theses fees in the definition of obligatory institutional fees included in the regulatory supervision (MELS, 2008c, p. 29), the diversity of terms has caused a certain confusion regarding the inclusion or not of the fees in the accounting entity of the OIF. University administrations, via the CRPUQ, have lobbied so that these fees are excluded. Such an exclusion would be in the financial advantage of institutions for two reasons: these fees would no longer be included in the calculation of the average destined to position institutions in the supervisory grid and would, in fact, be deregulated (since neither the rules concerning tuition fees, nor those regarding obligatory institutional fees regulate them). It is possible to think that universities wish to benefit from this loophole to generate increased revenues. On the basis of the same definition of the notion of the OIF (all the obligatory fees imposed by the universities on their students to the exclusion of tuition fees (MELS, 2008c, p. 29), the inclusion of writing fees, prolongation and others in this entity has never left a doubt for
Notice on The Regulation of Obligatory Institutional Fees Fdration tudiante universitaire du Qubec - 2011

the FEUQ. There is certainly a provision aiming to exclude the definition of fines and penalties inflicted on students that derogate from the financial or administrative rules, but we cannot affirm that the structure of a doctoral program constitutes such a rule; it rather imposes requirements of an academic nature. To this end, MELS has officially recognized that the interpretation of the FEUQ, in the case of writing fees - whatever the designated name - was indeed one that would be used to interpret the regulations. By the same token, extension fees are recognized as being OIF by the MELS. (See the official document in Appendix) 3.4 Particular problems occurring in 2008-09

During 2008-09, at least two institutions imposed hikes higher than the limits imposed by the regulatory supervision of the OIF and were the object of measures on the part of MELS aiming to force the reimbursement of the amounts collected over the limit. In the two cases, the infractions to regulatory supervision concerned the summer semester of 2008. It is not impossible that other problems occurred during the year.
3.4.1 cole polytechnique de Montral

In the case of the cole polytechnique de Montral, the directors proceeded in 2008 to the establishment of obligatory institutional fees required from students of the bachelors for the 2008 term, while none of these fees were required in the summer session of 2007. The result was an effective increase of $210 in the sense of the budgetary regulation, while the allowable increase for the summer term was $7.50 (half of the annual increase of $15.00).
Table 9 - Evolution of the obligatory institutional fees required from students at the bachelors during the summer semester of the cole polytechnique de Montral (2007 and 2008)

Summer 2007 Student services Technological fees Copyright General fees Total Increase 0,00 $ 0,00 $ 0,00 $ 0,00 $ 0,00 $ -

Summer 2008 75,00 $ 60,00 $ 12,75 $ 62,25 $ 210, 00 $ 210,00 $

This change was made under the pretext of harmonizing the rates required in the summer to those of autumn and winter. Since, MELS has clarified the situation by specifying that the limits imposed for the summer term apply on the basis of the amounts required in the previous summer term, independently of the autumn and winter terms (MELS, 2009). Concerning the summer semester of 2009, an agreement between the Association des tudiants de Polytechnique and the management of the cole has regularized the situation.

Notice on The Regulation of Obligatory Institutional Fees Fdration tudiante universitaire du Qubec - 2011

3.4.2

Universit de Montral

In the month of December 2007, the Universit de Montral announced an increase of $4 / credit in the fees for student services and $2 / credit in management fees, applicable as of the semester of summer 2008. Despite the coming into force of the regulatory supervision of the OIF, which limits the allowable increase for this semester to $25 for the Universit de Montral, the directors decided to maintain these increases (Cauchy, 2008).
Table 10 - Evolution of the obligatory institutional fees required in the summer semester at the Universit de Montral (2007 and 2008)

Undergraduate Summer 2007 7,00 $ / cr. 5,00 $ / cr 0,38 $ / cr. 12,38 $ 185,70 $ Summer 2008 11,00 $ / cr. 7,00 $ / cr. 0,41 $ / cr. 18,41 $ 276,15 $ 90,45 $

Graduate studies Summer 2007 105,00 $ 75,00 $ 0,38 $ / cr. 185,70 $ Summer 2008 165,00 $ 105,00 $ 0,41 $ / cr. 276,15 $ 90,45 $

Student services Management fees Copyright Total (per credit) Total (15 credits) Increase

At the end of the summer term of 2008, the Universit de Montral was forced to reimburse the excess amounts to the students concerned (FACUM, 2008).
3.4.3 Universities without general association

Universities without a general association bringing together the entirety of the students of an accreditation pool7 face particular problems on the application of the rule. In fact, the budgetary rules stipulates that
[if] various associations represent students from the same group of distinct students in the sense of article 2.1 of the [Act respecting the accreditation and financing of students associations], an agreement that concerns the students of many of these associations would not be valid until being ratified by one or several of these associations that represent more than 50% of the students of the distinct group of students concerned. (MELS, 2008c, p. 30)

Given that the university has more than one student interlocutor, this could lead to problematic situations in regard to relations between diverse associations. Specific Problems occurring in 2009-2010 During the year 2009-2010, a problematic case draws our attention because it created an OIF jurisprudence. In February 2010, the Faculty of Dentistry negotiated an increase of OIF with the recognized student organization representing students of this faculty (Association of dental students at the University of Montreal).

We think here of UQAR (Rimouski and Lvis campus), of UQAM (seven faculty associations) and McGill University (central campus and MacDonald campus). Notice on The Regulation of Obligatory Institutional Fees Fdration tudiante universitaire du Qubec - 2011

3.5 Specific Problems occurring in 2009-2010


3.5.1 The case of the Faculty of dentistry at the University of Montreal

In fact, the dental school has negotiated an increase in OIF which would lead to "the purchase or leasing of advanced technologies. The agreement spans five years, that is, an increase of OIF of $1,000 for the year 2010-2011, $ 1,500 for the year 2011-2012, $ 2,000 for year 2012-2013 and $2,500 for the years 2013-2014 and 2014-2015. Also, these amounts will be collected only from students of years 3 and 4 enrolled in the Bachelor of Dentistry. In return, the faculty is committed to allocating the amounts to 80% for the purpose of purchasing or leasing equipment and 20% of monies collected for the maintenance and repair of equipment. In addition, the faculty ($0.50) and the University ($0.50) undertake to pay a dollar for each dollar collected from students. However, this agreement creates a prejudice since it was approved by MELS and that on several points it violates regulations. For its part, MELS defended itself from properly applying the rule because for them, "rental equipment" is not defined as a purchase in the accounting sense. At first, it is specified in the agreement, the money collected will be invested for the purchase or lease of technology equipment. In this regard, the regulation is clear: "capital spending in the accounting sense, may be subject to a grant from a five-year university investment plan under these budget rules and should not be funded by the OIF. Moreover, in the academic investment plan 20082013, some funds are allocated to Laval University for the purchase of specialized equipment for medical, nursing and pharmacy programs. This suggests that when purchasing specialized equipment for the training of students, such funds may be subject to a grant from the five-year plan for university investments. On the other hand, in the agreement reached between the association representing the students and the Faculty of Dentistry, it is stated in paragraph 3.1.4 that the Faculty is committed to ensuring that the agreement will not compromise the principles of accessibility to education and perseverance to students of the Faculty. But in no case is it stated "how" the Faculty is committed to maintaining the accessibility and persistence of its students. Moreover, when the agreement will reach its final year of application, the tuition for students from dentistry program at the University of Montreal will require they pay double the fee they paid for 2009-2010. In this sense, all serious studies show that tuition fees have an impact on access to education (FEUQ, 2010a). Finally, this agreement replaces, indirectly, the terms of tuition and government grants. Indeed, fiscal rules describe the 2009-2010 university tuition fees as a way to pay "all educational activities offered through university programs. Thus, this agreement violates the basic definition of tuition while misrepresenting the essence of obligatory fees. In short, these fees are used for the purchase (or rent) equipment to be used for purposes of teaching students. Such an agreement is bad for the future. It distorts what the rules specify for the 2009-10 budget in regard to tuition and obligatory fees.
3.5.2 Public transit at the Universit de Sherbrooke

In 2009-2010, the administration of the Universit de Sherbrooke went forward with the negotiation of the renewal of the agreement with the Socit de transport de Sherbrooke, which was set to expire in summer 2010, without students. Now, the university
Notice on The Regulation of Obligatory Institutional Fees Fdration tudiante universitaire du Qubec - 2011

administration thought it could it could act cavalierly alone in the negotiation of the agreement with the STS and, especially, it thought it could increase the OIF of students without previously signing an agreement with the representative student associations. Yet, in the spirit of the rule on the regulation of obligatory institutional fees, there is this notion that agreements between the university institution and the representative student association must be prioritized. In autumn 2009, it is in this framework that the representative student associations learned that the UdeS intended to increase OIF by $49.50 per term, applicable as of the winter term of 2010. After calling their university administration to order, the representative student associations (FEUS, REMDUS) began negotiations concerning the new agreement for free access of students to the services of the STS. While at the beginning of the negotiations students were closed to the idea of subsidizing a service that was previously offered, they reviewed their orientation and finished by accepting to pay a certain amount to ensure the continuity of the service. Then, even if the FEUS said it was saddened to have to add an already considerable financial burden to students, this agreement is not closed. In fact, it leaves open the possibility for representative student associations to search for alternative financing methods. Finally, the agreement includes increases of $15, $27 and $27 (plus the adjustment due to the indexation set by the STS for its transportation tickets), respectively for the summer term of 2010, autumn 2010 and beginning in winter 2011 for subsequent terms. This agreement is for a duration of 5 years and it can end by the simple wish of the STS or the UdeS.

3.6

Refund of overpayments

During the early years of the application of the rule on OIF, many university administrations had not done their homework. Indeed, some of them have received money in excess, without any agreement with the recognized student organization and student representative about awarding an excess of the amount received by university administrations.
3.6.1 University of Montreal

This applies in particular to the University of Montreal, where students were charged more money and greater than the limit permitted by the regulations. Once in summer 2008 ($0.50 / student), another time during the year 2008-2009 ($1.60 / student) and again in 2009-2010 ($3 per student). In total, this amounts to nearly $145 000. To secure the reimbursement of such overpayments, the FAECUM the AGEEFEP and the administration from the University of Montreal came to an agreement in December 2010. These funds will be redistributed to the Fund account to improve student life, budget items Endowment - EFF and Endowment Fund that is invested in scholarships in a breakdown of the number of credits taken by students in the Faculty of Continuing Education and those of other faculties, and this, in compliance with Regulation
Notice on The Regulation of Obligatory Institutional Fees Fdration tudiante universitaire du Qubec - 2011

3.6.2

Polytechnic

At cole Polytechnique de Montral, the sums paid in excess in OIF totalled $111,000 for one semester of summer 2008 for undergraduates. In this respect, the recognized student organization representing undergraduates, the EPA has negotiated its agreement as follows: 1) The total and complete refund of overpayments made in two equal instalments; a. The first, upon approval of the agreement by the Department of Education b. The second, on June 1, 2010 2) In return, EPA agrees to use the money for student activities or to purchase equipment to serve all students; 3) Moreover, EPA agrees to provide a report on the stat of amounts every month of December of the year at the Polytechnic that it can assume the good faith of the student association; 4) The EPA also assumes responsibility for the negotiation process that has resulted from this agreement and thereby liberates the Polytechnic from any responsibility in case of disagreements or disputes; 5) Finally, it is stipulated that the agreement complies with the regulations surrounding the obligatory fees in universities, including Article 5. These are cases of overpayments that have led to agreements in good faith between the student unions and university administrations. Of course, it would be better for all if the university administration clung to the base, to the increase limits planned for this purpose in the regulation on obligatory fees in universities. Moreover, it is imperative that student unions are on the lookout for any increases that might occur on their campuses or in their department to prevent amounts being overcharged to students. By the same token, the limit provided for communication of increases of OIF on each campus would be very little or not at all respected by university administrations, which more often than not, are slow to send this information to MELS.

Recommendations to improve the regulation of OIF

The analysis of the regulatory supervision of obligatory institutional fees has shown that if this supervision constitutes an interesting advance in regard to the predictability of costs for students, there always persist deficiencies. 4.1 On the application of the current regulation

For the regulatory supervision of obligatory institutional fees in force from 2008-09 to 2010-11, certain measures need to be taken in order to make the application easier and more efficient.
Notice on The Regulation of Obligatory Institutional Fees Fdration tudiante universitaire du Qubec - 2011

4.1.1

Establish a common vocabulary

One of the concerns expressed by the FEUQ regarding obligatory institutional fees concerns their incoherent classification, namely the use of different vocabulary in different institutions to designate the same reality, or a common term for different realities. For its notice, the CCAFE also mentioned that about 2,300 different wordings had been surveyed and that evidently, many of them designate the same reality. It thus seems that a work of uniformity of terms aiming to designate different obligatory institutional fees is in order, in order to ensure the comparability of data between different institutions. This does not consist of introducing uniformity to services or denying the cultural differences existing between institutions, but only to agree on a common designation of different realities. In 2002, the Minister of Education carried out categorization work of the fees required by college institutions (MELS, 2002). Similar work concerning the university level, affecting the categorization of the classification, would certainly be more complex, but remains necessary. The FEUQ thus recommends: Recommendation 1 That the MELS establish a common classification of obligatory institutional fees between different university institutions The current definition of OIF in the budgetary rules may suggest that there are no limits to what can be understood as an OIF. Moreover, the "dentistry case" has shown instead that all avenues are possible to invent OIF. There is no doubt that the abolition of "so"at the end of each list of examples and that the establishment of a common classification would clarify the limits of the definition we can give to OIF. Recommendation 2 That the MELS establish an exhaustive list of OIF with a clear definition of what is an OIF
4.1.2 Individual limit

The maximum increase allowed is at the moment, configured in such way that it is each student that is covered by it. In other words, the maximum increase applies to every student, not a set of students. This specificity has the effect of protecting certain students in specific programs that could see their OIF increase dramatically and that this increase is diluted in the overall average of OIF per establishment. The FEUQ recommends: Recommendation 3 That the limit of increases allowed by the university be applied to the typical student and not according to all students of an institution.
4.1.3 Process of approval of an agreement by the student association

The first version of the regulation, submitted to the attention of the CCAFE, stipulated that Institution must establish with representatives delegated by students a consultation mechanism that will give the possibility to all students affected by the imposition of the fees pronounced in the proposed agreement (CCAFE, 2008, p. 30). The Committee noted with
Notice on The Regulation of Obligatory Institutional Fees Fdration tudiante universitaire du Qubec - 2011

reason that the coming into force of such a provision would have repercussions on the governance of student associations (CCAFE, 2008, p. 11). From the point of view of the FEUQ, the fact of requiring the approval of the university administration in regard to the consultation modalities would have constituted an unacceptable interference in the functioning of student associations. Furthermore, the process of approval described in the first version of the regulation would have been difficult to apply, notably in the case of the association groups recognized by virtue of article 10.2 of an Act respecting the accreditation and financing of students associations (Gouvernement du Qubec, 2009a). Fortunately, the version of the regulation included in the budgetary rules simply specifies that:
To be valid, an agreement with students should have been concluded with the association representative of the students concerned in the sense of the Act respecting the accreditation and financing of students associations. By representative association, we mean associations accredited or those recognized in the sense of article 56 of this Act. (MELS, 2008c, p. 30)8

Given the state of fact, it is necessary to ensure that the regulation is applied as such and the autonomy of student associations is respected at all times, both by MELS and university institutions and given that this rule is intended to encourage student participation in decision-making that would lead to an increase in OIF: Recommendation 4 That the autonomy of decisional bodies of student associations be respected at all times for the approval of agreements concerning obligatory institutional fees.
4.1.4 Transparence of data concerning obligatory institutional fees

The regulatory supervision plans the production and transmission to MELS of two types of document relative to the regulation of OIF: an official list of all the obligatory institutional fees that are required by itself or one of its components (faculties, departments, etc.); the detail of revenues collected by the OIF as OIF and the corresponding expenditures. In order to be able to ensure the rigorous application of the regulatory supervision and judge new proposals relative to obligatory institutional fees with all the information in hand, it is essential that student associations have access to documents that concern the fees imposed on their members. There is nothing in this regard that has been done since the establishment of the rule. Student associations generally suffer from a lack of cooperation from university administrations to get their hands on these data. But for there to be fair exchange requires that student organizations can assume the good faith of university administration. In this sense, the FEUQ recommends:

An association recognized by virtue of article 56 of the Act is an association that is not accredited by virtue the Act, but is recognized by the institution as representative of students of a given group and for which it collects dues (Gouvernement du Qubec, 2009a). Notice on The Regulation of Obligatory Institutional Fees Fdration tudiante universitaire du Qubec - 2011

Recommendation 5 That the documents produced by an institution in virtue of the budgetary rules regarding obligatory institutional fees be made accessible to associations representing students of this institution. Moreover, if the grid framework of OIF is available in the budgetary rules for this purpose, the positioning of each of Quebec universities still remains non-existent. MELS must inform the student body so it can make an informed choice about their academic institutions and, by extension, it should make public the position of Quebec universities on the grid framework for OIF. So, the FEUQ recommends: Recommendation 6 That the Quebec government makes available online the positioning of each of Quebec universities on the grid framework of OIF and therefore set out the maximum increase allowed for each semester and a list of universities by OIF every year.
4.1.5 Application of the limit on the summer session

The fiscal rule governing the OIF provides that the summer semester is not counted in the calculation of the academic year. An alternative interpretation would be to consider that the maximum allowable increase applies to the entire academic year, as it is generally understood - fall, winter and summer. Such an interpretation would effectively limit the fee increases, and thus encourage university administrations to conclude an agreement with the student representatives. This implies that the MELS modify the interpretation of the fiscal rule that it expressed to the member organizations of the Monitoring Committee on OIF and would apply to universities. Recommendation 7 That the MELS revise its interpretation of Article 3.3.2. of the fiscal rules that it considers that academic year includes fall, winter and summer semesters for the application of the OIF guidelines. 4.1.6 Limit Increases Cases such as dentistry, as we saw above, can threaten accessibility studies and may affect the continuation of studies for students who could not afford to assume such costly OIF in such a short time ($ 1,000 the first year, $ 1,500 the second year, $2,000 in year three and $2,500 in the fourth and fifth years of the implementation of the agreement). In anticipation of increases as large as these, the FEUQ considers that it is indispensible that MELS forbids all OIF that are not entirely admissible to the student financial assistance program. The FEUQ thus recommends: Recommendation 8 That MELS forbids any OIF that is not entirely admissible to the student financial assistance program. Although the good understanding between university administrations and representative student associations is favorable, we fear that these agreements, due to the breadth of their scope, can potentially compromise accessibility to studies and the
Notice on The Regulation of Obligatory Institutional Fees Fdration tudiante universitaire du Qubec - 2011

pursuit of studies for certain students. To lessen these fears, the FEUQ proposes that agreements between student associations and university institutions are limited to three years. This would have the effect of protecting student associations that do not want to assume agreements of a very long duration made by their predecessors. By this very fact, a time limit, fixed at three years, would allow the different university cohorts to not compromise the academic perseverance of subsequent cohorts. The FEUQ thus recommends: Recommendation 9 That MELS limit agreements between representative student associations and university institutions to three years. Moreover, during the creation of a rule, one of the goals announced was to promote good understanding between university institutions and student associations representative of the students concerned. Thus, with the implementation of a 4th level corresponding to an average of $785 of OIF collected per year in the classification of the framework grid of OIF and that would be fixed at $0 would have the effect of promoting these agreements. By the very fact, the 3rd level would be consequently adjusted and be established at a maximum increase of $15 per year for university institutions that collected OIF averaging between $699 and $785 per year. The FEUQ thus recommends: Recommendation 10 That MELS limit allowable increases by adding a 4th level of permitted increases to $0 when the average OIF of university institutions are above $785. Here is the new framework grid of OIF as proposed:
Table 8 Framework grid of obligatory institutional fees

University institutions whose average OIF * Are below $555 /year Situated between $555 and $699 /year Situated between $699 and $785 /year Sont suprieur 785 Over $785 /year

Increase allowed by students per year

Increase allowed by students for the following summer semester 25,00 $ 12,50 $ 7,50 $ 0,00 $

50,00 $ 25,00 $ 15,00 $ 0,00 $

Notice on The Regulation of Obligatory Institutional Fees Fdration tudiante universitaire du Qubec - 2011

University administrations have shown, over time, that they can be very imaginative in the means they take to circumvent the ministerial regulation. Throughout this notice, various troubling cases were presented and, in 2010-2011, the reimbursements made by university administrations to representative student associations prove this. Now, the penalties incurred by university institutions do not seem to discourage them in their efforts. Thus, in the avowed goal of making university institutions comply with the ministerial regulation and to protect students of a cohort facing significant increases, the FEUQ recommends:

Recommendation 11 That penalties are applied in the case of non-compliance to the obligations of the universities in regard to adherence to the application of the rule regulating OIF. 4.1.7 Inclusion of all extension fees Some prefer that extension fees are excluded in whole or in part from the regulations on OIF. Such an amendment would only distort the very meaning of the fiscal rule on the OIF, which is to promote agreements between university administrations and student associations, and to limit fee increases. The FEUQ, moreover, has been successful in recognizing the costs of extension in the scope of regulated OIF. Therefore, we reiterate our determination that the costs of extra time are still included in this entity.

Recommendation 12 That all extension fees remain included within the reporting entity of obligatory institutional fees. 4.1.8 Supervision of non-mandatory automatic contributions Some institutions are unable to show good faith and to respect the principles of transparency and access to the withdrawal modalities, so a regulation of non-mandatory automatic contributions is necessary to limit the imposition of such charges on student bills. Such regulation should require an agreement between the institution and the student association and, so far, these agreements are not included in the regulation on OIF. Recommendation 13 That non-mandatory automatic contributions be regulated by the regulation. This regulation should require an agreement between the institution and the student association concerned in order to impose contributions. 4.2 Legislative regulation of obligatory institutional fees

During the announcement of the elements of the regulation of OIF, the Minister Education has specified that it only applies for a period of three years (MELS, 2008a), to
Notice on The Regulation of Obligatory Institutional Fees Fdration tudiante universitaire du Qubec - 2011

then be reevaluated. This situation leaves an uncertainty lingering over the continuity of the regulation of the OIF, but also represents an opportunity to promote better solutions. Since 1992, the FEUQ has asked for the adoption of a legislative regulation of all the fees imposed by university institutions on their students. The arguments militating in favor of this regulation of a legislative nature are multiple: The registration of the regulation in a law ensures a greater continuity. The modification of the parameters written in the law flow from a decision of the National Assembly, and not simply from the Conseil des ministres, which favors the holding of a public debate on the measures proposed. The experience of the regulatory supervision shows that institutions were able to commit infractions in full knowledge of the facts, with the only consequence of a reimbursement of the amounts collected in excess. In the event of a legislative regulation, an institution at fault would be purely and simply in a situation of illegality. Furthermore, the deficiencies identified by the FEUQ at the time of the announcement of the regulation modalities remain, notably the fact that universities can continue to slightly increase ancillary fees, even in the absence of agreements with student associations (FEUQ, 2008). Furthermore, the regulation only crystallizes a state of facts that is in itself problematic, namely the imposition of obligatory institutional fees that were not established by virtue of agreements with student association representatives. Consequently, the FEUQ recommends: Recommendation 14 That the National Assembly of Quebec adopt a law regulating obligatory institutional fees required by university educational institutions (as well as their components) and stipulate that such fees can only be imposed if the nature, amount, and modalities of these fees are the object of an agreement between the institution and the student association recognized as being the representative of the students concerned. (CAU-643) Recommendations relative to student financial assistance 4.3 Recommendations relative to student financial assistance

The two main programs of Student Financial Assistance (SFA) of the government of Quebec take account in a different manner of the multiple fees required from students. To this effect, certain adjustments would be necessary to protect the student beneficiaries of the variations of OIF.
4.3.1 Loan and bursaries program

Article 29 of the Rglement sur laide financire aux tudes stipulates that the tuition fees, included in the allowable expenses of the Loan and Bursaries Program include admission fees, registration fees, tuition fees, ancillary fees for teaching services as well as other fees prescribed by the educational institution (Gouvernement du Qubec, 2009b). Thus, all the fees billed in an automatic way by institutions are accounted for as allowable expenses in the program.
Notice on The Regulation of Obligatory Institutional Fees Fdration tudiante universitaire du Qubec - 2011

On the other hand, it is impossible for a student or for a student association to verify the concordance between the fees required for a given program and the fees recognized by SFA. To this effect, the CCAFE notably recommends to take the necessary provisions to inform students of the obligatory institutional fees covered by the program of Student Financial Assistance (CCAFE, 2008, p. 20). In order to respond to this concern for transparence, the FEUQ recommends: Recommandation 15 That student financial assistance make public a list of tuition fees recognized as allowable expenses for each of the programs of study.
4.3.2 Loan programs for part-time studies

In contrast to the Program of Loans and Bursaries, destined for full-time students, the Student Loans Program for part-time studies recognizes a lump sum amount for tuition fees (art. 86 of the Rglement), without taking into account the fees really required by the institution in which the student is enrolled (Gouvernement du Qubec, 2009b). This manner of proceeding penalizes part-time students of institutions that require higher fees. We should remember that tuition fees serve to cover the following expenses: Tuition fees Other fees required by educational institutions Dues for student associations Didactic material In order to illustrate this deficiency, we should compare for some institutions the amounts required from a student enrolled in 6 credits in autumn 2009 (tuition fees and automatic fees only):
Institution HEC McGill UdeM UQAC Recognized tuition fees Fees required (6 credits) $573,70 $642,80 $490,14 $482,79 $577,38

We notice that in the case of a student enrolled at McGill University, the fees required exceed the expenses recognized as tuition fees; in the other cases, the margin of manoeuvre destined to cover student dues and the didactic material is quite slender. In order to remedy this deficiency, the FEUQ recommends:

Notice on The Regulation of Obligatory Institutional Fees Fdration tudiante universitaire du Qubec - 2011

Recommandation 16 That the amount of allowable expenses as tuition fees in the Loans Program for parttime studies be adjusted on a case-by-case basis to minimally cover the tuition fees, the obligatory institutional fees, student dues and the fees for didactic material. These adjustments must ensure the maintenance or increase of the volume of assistance available for beneficiaries of the program

Notice on The Regulation of Obligatory Institutional Fees Fdration tudiante universitaire du Qubec - 2011

Conclusion

By announcing the implementation of a regulation of obligatory institutional fees on February 15, 2008, the Minister of Education, Michelle Courchesne, responded to a longstanding demand of the student movement. However, the context of this measure, punctuated among other things by a lifting of the tuition freeze that will by itself raise the annual student bill by $500 (and by much more in certain cases), will have made more than a skeptic as to the real intent of the minister to ensure the maintenance and improvement of financial accessibility to studies. Three years after the putting in place of this new regulation, we have to recognize that substantial hikes have been avoided. For example, the Universit de Montral had planned, in December 2007, about $160/year of increases and had to revise its plans. However, it is already possible to plan that the average rate of increases will be significantly higher than the Consumer Price Index. We thus have to avoid the trap of recurrent increases, which will become an automatism and that will only aim to take a bit more from the pockets of students, without being associated with the new complementary services of the university mission and without being authorized by beneficiaries of these services, namely the students themselves! A close follow-up of the regulatory supervision of obligatory institutional fees is thus necessary in order to obtain the maximum protection of students against unjustified hikes. We have seen this in past yearsthe creativity of university administrations in regard to OIF is unlimited. Certain cases are currently in dispute and we are confident that the rule under its present form can allow a regulation in favor of students. Furthermore, given the deficiencies found, it seems more and more necessary to put in place a tool that is really capable of constraining university administrations to develop services in concert with students: a law on accessibility to university studies that would regulate the process of establishing and modifying obligatory institutional fees.

Notice on The Regulation of Obligatory Institutional Fees Fdration tudiante universitaire du Qubec - 2011

List of sources

AELIS. (2007). Mmoire sur l'encadrement des frais institutionnels obligatoires imposs aux tudiants dans les universits. Qubec : Association des tudiantes et des tudiants de Laval inscrits aux tudes suprieures. AEP. (2007). Frais affrents : la ncessit d'un encadrement. Montral : Association des tudiants de Polytechnique. AUM. (2007). Rtablir le vritable rle de frais affrents : des projets cibls de la communaut universitaire. Montral : Association des tudiants de l'Universit McGill. AGEEPP. (2007). Les frais insitutionnels obligatoires : pour en finir avec l'arbitraire. Qubec : Association gnrale des tudiants et tudiantes prgradus en philosophie (Universit Laval). AGEUQTR. (2007). Mmoire sur les frais affrents. Trois-Rivires : Association gnrale des tudiants de l'Universit du Qubec Trois-Rivires. ASS. (2007). Mmoire sur la gratuit scolaire. Montral : Association pour une solidarit syndicale tudiante. Banque du Canada. (2006). Feuille de calcul de l'inflation. Ottawa : Banque du Canada [http://www.banqueducanada.ca/fr/taux/inflation_calc-f.html, consult le 6 juillet 2009] CADEUL. (2007). Mmoire sur les frais affrents. Qubec : Confdration des associations d'tudiants de l'Universit Laval. Cauchy, C. (2008). Frais affrents : l'UdeM ne tient pas compte de la politique du MEQ . Le Devoir, 25 avril 2008, A5. CCAFE. (2004). L'accessibilit financire la russite du projet d'tudes. Qubec : Comit consultatif sur l'accessibilit financire aux tudes (Conseil suprieur de l'ducation). CCAFE. (2008). L'encadrement des frais institutionnels obligatoires dans les universits qubcoises. Qubec : Comit consultatif sur l'accessiblit financire aux tudes. Commission de l'ducation. (2004). Consultation gnrale sur les enjeux entourant la qualit, l'accessibilit et le financement des universits au Qubec - Rapport final. Qubec : Assemble nationale du Qubec. CRPUQ. (2006). Le systme universitaire qubcois : donnes et indicateurs. Montral : Confrence des recteurs et principaux des universits du Qubec [http://www.crepuq.qc.ca/IMG/pdf/indicateurs.pdf, consult le 13 juillet 2009]
Notice on The Regulation of Obligatory Institutional Fees Fdration tudiante universitaire du Qubec - 2011

CRPUQ. (2007). Lettre de Mme Heather Monroe-Blum, prsidente de la CRPUQ, Mme Michelle Courchesne, ministre de l'ducation, du Loisir et du Sport (dans le cadre de la consultation sur les frais institutionnels obligatoires, le 5 octobre 2007). Montral. CSN. (2007). Mmoire prsent la ministre de l'ducation, du Loisir et du Sport dans le cadre de la consultation sur les frais institutionnels obligatoires dans les universits. Montral : Confdration des syndicats nationaux. CSQ. (2007). Le droit l'ducation postsecondaire passe par une loi-cadre sur l'accessibilit aux tudes suprieures. Montral : Centrale des syndicats du Qubec. Descary, P. (2009). Modalits de dsistement des cotisations automatiques non obligatoires. Montral : Bureau de l'Ombudsman (Universit de Montral). Desrosiers, J.-Y. (2002). tude sur les frais autres que les droits de scolarit dans les universits qubcoises. Qubec : ministre de l'ducation du Qubec. FACUM. (2008). FIO : l'UdM rentre dans les rangs! Montral : Fdration des associations tudiantes du campus de l'Universit de Montral [http://www.faecum.qc.ca/main.cfm?p=00_200&ID=67, consult le 17 juillet 2009] FACUM. (2007). Mmoire sur les frais supplmentaires factures aux tudiants par les universits qubcoises et du G13. Montral : Fdration des associations tudiantes du campus de l'Universit de Montral. FAEUQEP. (2007). Les frais institutionnels obligatoires des universits dans une perspective de gratuit scolaire. Montral : Fdration des associations tudiantes universitaires qubcoises en ducation permanente. FECQ. (2007). Avis sur l'encadrement des frais affrents universitaires. Montral : Fdration tudiante collgiale du Qubec. FEUQ. (2003a). lections 2003 : de grands dfis relever. Manifeste lectoral. Montral : Fdration tudiante universitaire du Qubec. FEUQ. (2002a). tude sur l'volution des frais de scolarit dans les universits: des frais nonrglements pour contourner le gel des frais de scolarit. Montral: Fdration tudiante universitaire du Qubec. FEUQ. (1996). Pour une loi-cadre sur les frais de scolarit et sur l'aide financire. Pour que cette loi rgule les frais dits "autres". Montral : Fdration tudiante universitaire du Qubec. FEUQ. (2003b). Mmoire de la FEUQ : Commission parlementaire sur la qualit, laccessibilit et le financement des universits. Montral : Fdration tudiante universitaire du Qubec. FEUQ. (2003c). Projet de loi-cadre. Montral : Fdration tudiante universitaire du Qubec.
Notice on The Regulation of Obligatory Institutional Fees Fdration tudiante universitaire du Qubec - 2011

FEUQ. (2007). Mmoire sur les frais affrents ou frais institutionnels obligatoires de toute nature. Montral : Fdration tudiante universitaire du Qubec. FEUQ. (2008). Frais affrents chargs par les universits: la ministre stoppe l'hmorragie, mais du chemin reste faire. Montral : Fdration tudiante universitaire du Qubec [http://www.feuq.qc.ca/index.php?lang=fr&section=actualite&nid=475, consult le 18 juillet 2009] FEUS. (2007). Les frais affrents la frquentation universitaire. Sherbrooke : Fdration tudiante de l'Universit de Sherbrooke. FNEEQ-CSN. (2007). propos de l'encadrement des frais institutionnels obligatoires imposs dans les universits. Montral : Fdration nationale des enseignantes et des enseignants du Qubec de la Confdration des syndicats nationaux. FQPPU. (2007). Une fausse solution locale un problme global. Montral : Fdration qubcoise des professeures et professeurs d'universit. Gougeon, . (2003). Panorama des frais affrents l'UQAM pour l'anne 2002-2003. Montral : Associations tudiantes facultaires de l'UQAM. Gouvernement du Qubec. (2009a). Loi sur l'accrditation et le financement des associations d'lves ou d'tudiants (L.R.Q. A-3.01). Qubec : Gouvernement du Qubec [http://www2.publicationsduquebec.gouv.qc.ca/dynamicSearch/telecharge.php? type=2&file=/A_3_01/A3_01.html, consult le 18 juillet 2009] Gouvernement du Qubec. (2009b). Rglement sur l'aide financire aux tudes (L.R.Q. A133, r. 1). Qubec : Gouvernement du Qubec [http://www2.publicationsduquebec.gouv.qc.ca/dynamicSearch/telecharge.php? type=3&file=/A_13_3/A13_3R1.HTM, consult le 19 juillet 2009] MELS. (2002). Document d'encadrement sur les droits prescrits en vertu de l'article 24.5 de la Loi sur les collges d'enseignement gnral et professionnel. Qubec : ministre de l'ducation, du Loisir et du Sport [http://www.mels.gouv.qc.ca/ens-sup/enscoll/droits_prescrits.pdf, consult le 18 juillet 2009] MELS. (2007a). La ministre Michelle Courchesne annonce la concrtisation d'engagements lectoraux du gouvernement en matire d'enseignement suprieur. Qubec : ministre de l'ducation, du Loisir et du Sport [http://communiques.gouv.qc.ca/gouvqc/communiques/GPQF/Juin2007/28/c2 298.html, consult le 13 juillet 2009] MELS. (2007b). Rgles budgtaires et calcul des subventions de fonctionnement aux universits du Qubec pour l'anne 2007-2008. Qubec : ministre de l'ducation, du Loisir et du Sport [http://www.mels.gouv.qc.ca/ens-sup/ftp/Regl0708.pdf, consult le 17 juillet 2009]

Notice on The Regulation of Obligatory Institutional Fees Fdration tudiante universitaire du Qubec - 2011

MELS. (2008a). Les frais institutionnels obligatoires seront dornavant rglements. Qubec : ministre de l'ducation, du Loisir et du Sport [http://communiques.gouv.qc.ca/gouvqc/communiques/GPQF/Fevrier2008/15 /c2852.html, consult le 15 juillet 2009] MELS. (2008b). Prvisions de l'effectif tudiant en quivalence au temps plein dans les universits du Qubec pour les annes 2008-2009 2022-2023. Qubec : ministre de l'ducation, du Loisir et du Sport [http://www.mels.gouv.qc.ca/sections/publications/index.asp?page=previsions_ univ, consult le 14 juillet 2009] MELS. (2008c). Rgles budgtaires et calcul des subventions de fonctionnement aux universits du Qubec pour l'anne universitaire 2008-2009. Qubec : ministre de l'ducation, du Loisir et du Sport [http://www.mels.gouv.qc.ca/ens-sup/ftp/Regl0809.pdf, consult le 25 juin 2009] MELS. (2003-2008). Statistiques de l'ducation - ditions 2003 2008. Secteur de l'information, des communications et de l'administration. Qubec : ministre de l'ducation du Loisir et du Sport. MELS. (2009). Hausse maximale des frais institutionnels obligatoires (FIO) au trimestre d't et aux trimestres d'automne et d'hiver. Qubec : ministre de l'ducation, du Loisir et du Sport, Secteur de l'enseignement suprieur. PLQ. (2007). S'unir pour russir le Qubec de demain - Plate-forme lectorale. Montral : Parti libral du Qubec. RFAEC. (2007). Avis sur la gestion des frais institutionnels obligatoires. Montral : Regroupement tudiant des facults d'administration de l'Est du Canada. REMDUS. (2007). Pour l'adoption d'une loi cadre concernant les frais affrents. Sherbrooke : Regroupement des tudiants de matrise, de diplme et de doctorat de l'Universit de Sherbrooke. Statistique Canada. (1995-2008). Frais de scolarit et de subsistance des tudiants plein temps dans les universits et collges du Canada qui confrent des grades. Ottawa : Statistique Canada [http://www.statcan.gc.ca/dli-ild/data-donnees/pumffmgd/education/tlac.zip, consult le 6 juin 2009] UdeM. (2007). tats financiers de l'Universit de Montral. Montral : Universit de Montral [http://www.fin.umontreal.ca/documents/UdeM_06-07_000.pdf, consult le 16 juillet 2009] Universit Laval. (2007). Position de l'Universit Laval - Consultation sur l'encadrement des frais institutionnels obligatoires imposs aux tudiants dans les universits. Qubec : Universit Laval.

Notice on The Regulation of Obligatory Institutional Fees Fdration tudiante universitaire du Qubec - 2011

Annexe I -

Dtail des frais automatiques par session

Pour les fins de cette compilation, les trois profils dtudiants mentionns la section Erreur ! Source du renvoi introuvable. ont t utiliss, soit : tudiant au baccalaurat, inscrit 15 crdits par session, t, automne et hiver. tudiant aux cycles suprieurs, inscrit 15 crdits par session, t, automne et hiver. tudiant inscrit en rdaction, temps plein (aucun crdit de cours). Seuls les frais porte universitaire, soit ceux appliqus lchelle dun campus, ont t recenss. Les variations prsentes sont calcules sur la base de la session correspondante de lanne prcdente. 1. Bishops
1.1. tudiants au baccalaurat
Liste des frais Facturs par session Registration Fee Student Services Facturs par crdit Copyright Fees Total FIO 15 crdits Variation ($) Variation (%) 2007-2008 t Hiv. Aut. t 2008-2009 Hiv. Aut. t 2009-2010 Hiv. Aut. t 2010-2011 Hiv. Aut.

N/D N/D

40,00 $ 340,50 $

40,00 $ 340,50 $

N/D N/D

40,00 $ 340,50 $

40,00 $ 340,50 $

30,00 $ -$

0,00 $ 457,50 $

0,00 $ 457,50 $

N/D N/D

N/D 467,00 $

N/D 467,00 $

N/D

0,00 $

0,00 $

N/D

0,68 $

0,68 $

0,73 $

0,78 $

0,78 $

N/D

0,81 $

0,81 $

N/D

380,50 $

380,50 $

N/D

390,70 $ 10,20 $ 2,68%

390,70 $ 10,20 $ 2,68%

40,95 $ N/D N/D

469,20 $ 78,50 $ 20,09%

469,20 $ 78,50 $ 20,09%

N/D N/D N/D

479,15 $ 9,95 $ 2,12%

479,15 $ 9,95 $ 2,12%

Erreur ! Source du renvoi introuvable. Fdration tudiante universitaire du Qubec - 2011

1.2. Sources

Bishops University. 2010-2011 fees. [http://www.ubishops.ca/school-fees/details-list-of-fees-academic-calendar.html consult le 16 janvier 2011] Bishops University. Academic Calendar 2008-2009 Fees. [http://www.ubishops.ca/academic/cal005.html, consult le 22 juin 2009] Bishops University. 2010-2011 fees. [http://www.ubishops.ca/school-fees/details-list-of-fees-academic-calendar.html consult le 16 janvier 2011]

2. Concordia
2.1. tudiants au baccalaurat et aux cycles suprieurs
Liste des frais t Facturs par session Registration Fee Facturs par crdit Administrative Fee Student Service Fee Recreation & Athletics Fee Information Technology Fee Copyright Fee 9,00 $ 9,95 $ 2,85 $ 4,00 $ 0,75 $ 9,00 $ 9,95 $ 2,85 $ 4,00 $ 0,75 $ 9,00 $ 9,95 $ 2,85 $ 4,00 $ 0,75 $ 9,00 $ 10,26 $ 2,92 $ 4,08 $ 0,80 $ 9,00 $ 10,26 $ 2,92 $ 4,08 $ 0,80 $ 9,00 $ 10,26 $ 2,92 $ 4,08 $ 0,80 $ 9,00 $ 10,26 $ 2,92 $ 4,16 $ 0,85 $ 9,00 $ 10,26 $ 2,92 $ 4,16 $ 0,85 $ 9,00 $ 10,26 $ 2,92 $ 4,16 $ 0,85 $ 9,18 $ 10,26 $ 2,92 $ 4,40 $ 0,88 $ 9,18 $ 10,26 $ 2,92 $ 4,40 $ 0,88 $ 9,18 $ 10,26 $ 2,92 $ 4,40 $ 0,88 $ 20,00 $ 20,00 $ 20,00 $ 20,00 $ 20,00 $ 20,00 $ 20,00 $ 20,00 $ 20,00 $ 25,00 $ 25,00 $ 25,00 $ 2007-2008 Hiv. Aut. t 2008-2009 Hiv. Aut. t 2009-2010 Hiv. Aut. t 2010-2011 Hiv. Aut.

Erreur ! Source du renvoi introuvable. Fdration tudiante universitaire du Qubec - 2011

Total FIO 15 crdits Variation ($) Variation (%)

418,25 $

418,25 $

418,25 $

426,00 $ 7,75 $ 1,85%

426,00 $ 7,75 $ 1,85%

426,00 $ 7,75 $ 1,85%

427,85 $ 1,85 $ 0,04%

427,85 $ 1,85 $ 0,04%

427,85 $ 1,85 $ 0,04%

439,96 $ 12,11 $ 2,83%

439,96 $ 12,11 $ 2,83%

439,96 $ 12,11 $ 2,83%

2.2. tudiants au statut de rdaction (Continuation)

Note : partir du 7e trimestre la matrise et du 13e trimestre au doctorat (pour un tudiant temps plein)
Liste des frais Facturs par session Continuation Fee Registration Fee Total FIO 15 crdits Variation ($) Variation (%) 400,00 $ 20,00 $ 420,00 $ 400,00 $ 20,00 $ 420,00 $ 400,00 $ 20,00 $ 420,00 $ 400,00 $ 20,00 $ 420,00 $ 0,00 $ 0,00% 400,00 $ 20,00 $ 420,00 $ 0,00 $ 0,00% 400,00 $ 20,00 $ 420,00 $ 0,00 $ 0,00% 400,00 $ 20,00 $ 420,00 $ 0,00 $ 0,00% 400,00 $ 20,00 $ 420,00 $ 0,00 $ 0,00% 400,00 $ 20,00 $ 420,00 $ 0,00 $ 0,00% 400,00 $ 25,00 $ 425,00 $ 5,00 $ 1,19 % 400,00 $ 25,00 $ 425,00 $ 5,00 $ 1,19 % 400,00 $ 25,00 $ 425,00 $ 5,00 $ 1,19 % 2007-2008 t Hiv. Aut. t 2008-2009 Hiv. Aut. t 2009-2010 Hiv. Aut. t 2010-2011 Hiv. Aut.

2.3. tudiants au statut de rdaction (Time-Limit Extension)

Note : partir du 13e trimestre la matrise et du 19e trimestre au doctorat (pour un tudiant temps plein)

Erreur ! Source du renvoi introuvable. Fdration tudiante universitaire du Qubec - 2011

Liste des frais Facturs par session Time-Limit Extension Fee Registration Fee Total FIO 15 crdits Variation ($) Variation (%)

2007-2008 t Hiv. Aut. t

2008-2009 Hiv. Aut. t

2009-2010 Hiv. Aut. t

2010-2011 Hiv. Aut.

600,00 $ 20,00 $ 620,00 $

600,00 $ 20,00 $ 620,00 $

600,00 $ 20,00 $ 620,00 $

600,00 $ 20,00 $ 620,00 $ 0,00 $ 0,00%

600,00 $ 20,00 $ 620,00 $ 0,00 $ 0,00%

600,00 $ 20,00 $ 620,00 $ 0,00 $ 0,00%

600,00 $ 20,00 $ 620,00 $ 0,00 $ 0,00%

600,00 $ 20,00 $ 620,00 $ 0,00 $ 0,00%

600,00 $ 20,00 $ 620,00 $ 0,00 $ 0,00%

600,00 $ 25,00 $ 625,00 $ 5,00 $ 0,81%

600,00 $ 25,00 $ 625,00 $ 5,00 $ 0,81%

600,00 $ 25,00 $ 625,00 $ 5,00 $ 0,81%

2.4. Sources

Concordia University. Financial Regulations and fees undergraduate programs. [http://tuitionandfees.concordia.ca, consult le 16 janvier 2011] Concordia University. Financial Regulations and fees for Masters & PhD degree programs. [http://tuitionandfees.concordia.ca, consult le 16 janvier 2011]

Erreur ! Source du renvoi introuvable. Fdration tudiante universitaire du Qubec - 2011

3. cole nationale dadministration publique


3.1. tudiants aux cycles suprieurs
Liste des frais Facturs par session Frais gnraux Facturs par crdit Services aux tudiants Droits d'auteur Frais technologiques Total FIO 15 crdits Variation ($) Variation (%) N/D N/D N/D N/D N/D 40,00 $ 3,27 $ 0,65 $ 2,00 $ 128,80 $ 40,00 $ 3,27 $ 0,65 $ 2,00 $ 128,80 $ 40,00 $ 3,27 $ 0,65 $ 2,00 $ 128,80 $ N/D N/D 40,00 $ 3,27 $ 0,65 $ 2,80 $ 128,80 $ 12,00 $ 9,32 % 40,00 $ 3,27 $ 0,65 $ 2,00 $ 140,80 $ 0,00 $ 0,00% 40,00 $ 3,27 $ 0,65 $ 2,00 $ 128,80 $ N/D N/D 40,00 $ 3,27 $ 0,65 $ 2,00 $ 128,80 $ 0,00 $ 0% 40,00 $ 3,27 $ 0,65 $ 2,80 $ 140,80 $ 12,00 $ 9,32 % 40,00 $ 3,27 $ 0,65 $ 2,80 $ 140,80 $ 0,00 $ 0,00 % 40,00 $ 3,27 $ 0,65 $ 2,80 $ 140,80 $ 0,00 $ 0,00 % 40,00 $ 3,27 $ 0,65 $ 2,80 $ 140,80 $ 0,00 $ 0,00 % 2007-2008 t Hiv. Aut. t 2008-2009 Hiv. Aut. t 2009-2010 Hiv. Aut. t 2010-2011 Hiv. Aut.

3.2. tudiants au statut de rdaction


2007-2008 Liste des frais t Facturs par session Frais de rdaction Services aux tudiants Frais gnraux Hiv. Aut. t Hiv. Aut. t Hiv. Aut. t Hiv. Aut. 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011

N/D N/D N/D

N/D N/D N/D

N/D N/D N/D

N/D N/D N/D

250,00 $ 32,70 $ 40,00 $

300,00 $ 32,70 $ 40,00 $

300,00 $ 32,70 $ 40,00 $

300,00 $ 32,70 $ 40,00 $

300,00 $ 32,70 $ 40,00 $

300,00 $ 32,70 $ 40,00 $

300,00 $ 32,70 $ 40,00 $

300,00 $ 32,70 $ 40,00 $

Total FIO 15 crdits

N/D

N/D

N/D

N/D

322,70 $

372,70 $

372,70 $

372,70 $

372,70 $

372,70 $

372,70 $

372,70 $

Erreur ! Source du renvoi introuvable. Fdration tudiante universitaire du Qubec - 2011

Variation ($) Variation (%)

N/D N/D

N/D N/D

50,00 $ 15,49%

N/D N/D

N/D N/D

N/D N/D

0,00 $ 0,00%

0,00 $ 0,00%

0,00 $ 0,00%

3.3. Sources

NAP. Guichet tudiant > Frais dtudes. [http://www.enap.uquebec.ca/enap/fr/guichet2008.aspx?sortcode=1.33.33.46, consult le 16 juin 2009] NAP, [http:/www.enap.ca/enap/421/frais_detudes.enap, consult le 16 janvier 2011] 4. cole de technologie suprieure
4.1. tudiants au baccalaurat et aux cycles suprieurs
Liste des frais Facturs par session Frais gnraux Services aux tudiants Service des sports Facturs par crdit Services aux tudiants Frais technologiques Droit d'auteur N/D 30,00 $ 15,00 $ 27,50 $ 30,00 $ 15,00 $ 27,50 $ 30,00 $ 15,00 $ 40,00 $ 34,00 $ 15,00 $ 40,00 $ 34,00 $ 15,00 $ 40,00 $ 34,00 $ 15,00 $ 40,00 $ 34,00 $ 15,00 $ 40,00 $ 34,00 $ 15,00 $ 40,00 $ 34,00 $ 15,00 $ 40,00 $ 34,00 $ 20,00 $ 40,00 $ 34,00 $ 20,00 $ 40,00 $ 34,00 $ 20,00 $ 2007-2008 t Hiv. Aut. t 2008-2009 Hiv. Aut. t 2009-2010 Hiv. Aut. t 2010-2011 Hiv. Aut.

1,00 $ N/D 0,60 $

1,00 $ 4,00 $ 0,60 $

1,00 $ 4,00 $ 0,60 $

1,00 $ 4,00 $ 0,60 $

1,00 $ 4,00 $ 0,60 $

1,00 $ 4,00 $ 0,60 $

1,00 $ 4,00 $ 0,60 $

1,00 $ 4,00 $ 0,60 $

1,00 $ 4,00 $ 0,60 $

1,00 $ 4,75 $ 0,60 $

1,00 $ 4,75 $ 0,60 $

1,00 $ 4,75 $ 0,60 $

Erreur ! Source du renvoi introuvable. Fdration tudiante universitaire du Qubec - 2011

Total FIO 15 crdits Variation ($) Variation (%)

N/D

156,50 $

156,50 $

173,00 $ N/D N/D

173,00 $ 16,50 $ 10,54%

173,00 $ 16,50 $ 10,54%

173,00 $ 0,00 $ 0,00%

173,00 $ 0,00 $ 0,00%

173,00 $ 0,00 $ 0,00%

189,25 $ 16,25 $ 9,39%

189,25 $ 16,25 $ 9,39%

189,25 $ 16,25 $ 9,39%

4.2. tudiants au statut de rdaction


Liste des frais Facturs par session Frais de rdaction Frais gnraux Services aux tudiants Facturs par crdit Services aux tudiants Frais technologiques Droit d'auteur Total FIO 15 crdits Variation ($) Variation (%) 1,00 $ N/D 0,60 $ 164,00 $ 1,00 $ 4,00 $ 0,60 $ 224,00 $ N/D 1,00 $ 4,00 $ 0,60 $ 224,00 $ 1,00 $ 4,00 $ 0,60 $ 228,00 $ 4,00 $ 2,86% 1,00 $ 4,00 $ 0,60 $ 228,00 $ 4,00 $ 2,86% 1,00 $ 4,00 $ 0,60 $ 228,00 $ 4,00 $ 2,86% 1,00 $ 4,00 $ 0,60 $ 228,00 $ -$ 0,00% 1,00 $ 4,00 $ 0,60 $ 228,00 $ -$ 0,00% 1,00 $ 4,00 $ 0,60 $ 228,00 $ -$ 0,00% 1,00 $ 4,75 $ 0,60 $ 239,25 $ 11,25 $ 4,93% 1,00 $ 4,75 $ 0,60 $ 239,25 $ 11,25 $ 4,93% 1,00 $ 4,75 $ 0,60 $ 239,25 $ 11,25 $ 4,93% 70,00 $ 40,00 $ 30,00 $ 70,00 $ 40,00 $ 30,00 $ 70,00 $ 40,00 $ 30,00 $ 70,00 $ 40,00 $ 34,00 $ 70,00 $ 40,00 $ 34,00 $ 70,00 $ 40,00 $ 34,00 $ 70,00 $ 40,00 $ 34,00 $ 70,00 $ 40,00 $ 34,00 $ 70,00 $ 40,00 $ 34,00 $ 70,00 $ 40,00 $ 34,00 $ 70,00 $ 40,00 $ 34,00 $ 70,00 $ 40,00 $ 34,00 $ 2007-2008 t Hiv. Aut. t 2008-2009 Hiv. Aut. t 2009-2010 Hiv. Aut. t 2010-2011 Hiv. Aut.

4.3. Sources

TS. Bureau du registraire Cot des tudes. [http://www.etsmtl.ca/zone2/administration/registraire/couts.html, consult le 16 juin 2009] TS, Futurs tudiants Cot des tudes. [http://www.etsmtl.ca/Futurs-etudiants/Baccalaureat/Coutfinancement/combien/Cout-etudes-trimestre#frais, consult le 16 janvier 2011]
Erreur ! Source du renvoi introuvable. Fdration tudiante universitaire du Qubec - 2011 7

5. cole des Hautes tudes commerciales


5.1. tudiants au baccalaurat
Liste des frais Facturs par session Frais gnraux Facturs par crdit Frais technologiques Services aux tudiants Copibec Feuilles mobiles Encadrement et promotion Total FIO 15 crdits Variation ($) Variation (%) 10,00 $ 9,70 $ 0,71 $ 0,55 $ 4,00 $ 10,00 $ 9,70 $ 0,71 $ 0,55 $ 4,00 $ 10,00 $ 9,70 $ 0,71 $ 0,55 $ 4,00 $ 10,00 $ 9,70 $ 0,71 $ 0,55 $ 4,00 $ 11,00 $ 9,84 $ 0,78 $ 0,55 $ 4,06 $ 11,00 $ 9,84 $ 0,78 $ 0,55 $ 4,06 $ 12,00 $ 9,96 $ 0,78 $ 0,10 $ 4,11 $ 12,00 $ 9,96 $ 0,78 $ 0,10 $ 4,11 $ 12,00 $ 9,96 $ 0,78 $ 0,10 $ 4,11 $ 13,00 $ 10,09 $ 0,86 $ 0,10 $ 4,16 $ 13,00 $ 10,09 $ 0,86 $ 0,10 $ 4,16 $ 13,00 $ 10,09 $ 0,86 $ 0,10 $ 4,16 $ 36,00 $ 36,00 $ 36,00 $ 36,00 $ 36,50 $ 36,50 $ 36,94 $ 36,94 $ 36,94 $ 37,42 $ 37,42 $ 37,42 $ 2007-2008 t Hiv. Aut. t 2008-2009 Hiv. Aut. t 2009-2010 Hiv. Aut. t 2010-2011 Hiv. Aut.

410,40 $

410,40 $

410,40 $

410,40 $ 19,55 $ 4,76%

410,40 $ 19,55 $ 4,76%

429,95 $ 19,55 $ 4,76%

441,19 $ 11,24 $ 2,61%

441,19 $ 11,24 $ 2,61%

441,19 $ 11,24 $ 2,61%

460,57 $ 19,38 $ 4,39%

460,57 $ 19,38 $ 4,39%

460,57 $ 19,38 $ 4,39%

5.2. tudiants la matrise s Sciences de la gestion


Liste des frais Facturs par session Frais gnraux 36,00 $ 36,00 $ 36,00 $ 36,50 $ 36,50 $ 36,50 $ 36,94 $ 36,94 $ 36,94 $ 37,42 $ 37,42 $ 37,42 $ 2007-2008 t Hiv. Aut. t 2008-2009 Hiv. Aut. t 2009-2010 Hiv. Aut. t 2010-2011 Hiv. Aut.

Erreur ! Source du renvoi introuvable. Fdration tudiante universitaire du Qubec - 2011

Frais technologiques Services aux tudiants Encadrement et promotion Copibec Feuilles mobiles Total FIO 15 crdits Variation ($) Variation (%)

75,00 $ 58,20 $ 67,50 $ 3,73 $ 2,89 $

75,00 $ 116,40 $ 67,50 $ 3,73 $ 2,89 $

75,00 $ 116,40 $ 67,50 $ 3,73 $ 2,89 $

82,50 $ 59,04 $ 68,40 $ 4,10 $ 2,89 $

82,50 $ 118,08 $ 68,40 $ 4,10 $ 2,89 $

82,50 $ 118,08 $ 68,40 $ 4,10 $ 2,89 $

90,00 $ 59,75 $ 69,19 $ 4,10 $ 0,53 $

90,00 $ 119,50 $ 69,19 $ 4,10 $ 0,53 $

90,00 $ 119,50 $ 69,19 $ 4,10 $ 0,53 $

97,50 $ 60,53 $ 93,45 $ 4,50 $ 1,50 $

97,50 $ 121,05 $ 93,45 $ 4,50 $ 1,50 $

97,50 $ 121,05 $ 93,45 $ 4,50 $ 1,50 $

243,32 $

301,52 $

301,52 $

253,43 $ 10,11 $ 4,16%

312,47 $ 10,95 $ 3,63%

312,47 $ 10,95 $ 3,63%

260,51 $ 7,08 $ 2,79%

320,26 $ 7,79 $ 2,49%

320,26 $ 7,79 $ 2,49%

294,90 $ 34,39 $ 13,20%

355,42 $ 35,16 $ 10,98%

355,42 $ 35,16 $ 10,98%

5.3. tudiants au doctorat


Liste des frais Facturs par session Frais gnraux Frais technologiques Services aux tudiants Encadrement et promotion Copibec Feuilles mobiles Total FIO 12 crdits 36,00 $ 75,00 $ 58,20 $ 67,50 $ 3,55 $ 2,75 $ 36,00 $ 75,00 $ 116,40 $ 67,50 $ 3,55 $ 2,75 $ 36,00 $ 75,00 $ 116,40 $ 67,50 $ 3,55 $ 2,75 $ 36,50 $ 82,50 $ 59,04 $ 68,40 $ 3,90 $ 2,75 $ 36,50 $ 82,50 $ 118,08 $ 68,40 $ 3,90 $ 2,75 $ 36,50 $ 82,50 $ 118,08 $ 68,40 $ 3,90 $ 2,75 $ 36,94 $ 90,00 $ 59,75 $ 69,19 $ 3,90 $ 0,50 $ 36,94 $ 90,00 $ 119,50 $ 69,19 $ 3,90 $ 0,50 $ 36,94 $ 90,00 $ 119,50 $ 69,19 $ 3,90 $ 0,50 $ 37,42 $ 97,50 $ 60,53 $ 70,09 $ 4,50 $ 0,50 $ 37,42 $ 97,50 $ 121,05 $ 70,09 $ 4,50 $ 0,50 $ 37,42 $ 97,50 $ 121,05 $ 70,09 $ 4,50 $ 0,50 $ 2007-2008 t Hiv. Aut. t 2008-2009 Hiv. Aut. t 2009-2010 Hiv. Aut. t 2010-2011 Hiv. Aut.

243,00 $

301,20 $

301,20 $

253,09 $

312,13 $

312,13 $

260,28 $

320,03 $

320,03 $

270,54 $

331,06 $

331,06 $

Erreur ! Source du renvoi introuvable. Fdration tudiante universitaire du Qubec - 2011

Variation ($) Variation (%)

10,09 $ 4,15%

10,93 $ 3,63%

10,93 $ 3,63%

7,19 $ 2,84%

7,90 $ 2,53%

7,90 $ 2,53%

10,26 $ 3,94%

11,03 $ 3,45%

11,03 $ 3,45%

5.4. tudiants au statut de rdaction (Matrise)


Liste des frais Facturs par session Frais de rdaction Frais gnraux Frais technologiques Services aux tudiants Encadrement et promotion Copibec Total FIO 12 crdits Variation ($) Variation (%) 2007-2008 t Hiv. Aut. t 2008-2009 Hiv. Aut. t 2009-2010 Hiv. Aut. t 2010-2011 Hiv. Aut.

400,00 $ 36,00 $ 75,00 $ 58,20 $ 67,50 $ -$ 636,70 $

400,00 $ 36,00 $ 75,00 $ 116,40 $ 67,50 $ -$ 694,90 $

400,00 $ 36,00 $ 75,00 $ 116,40 $ 67,50 $ -$ 694,90 $

400,00 $ 36,50 $ 82,50 $ 59,04 $ 68,40 $ -$ 646,44 $ 9,74 $ 1,53%

400,00 $ 36,50 $ 82,50 $ 118,08 $ 68,40 $ -$ 705,48 $ 10,58 $ 1,52%

400,00 $ 36,50 $ 82,50 $ 118,08 $ 68,40 $ -$ 705,48 $ 10,58 $ 1,52%

400,00 $ 36,94 $ 90,00 $ 59,75 $ 69,19 $ -$ 655,88 $ 9,44 $ 1,46%

400,00 $ 36,94 $ 90,00 $ 119,50 $ 69,19 $ -$ 715,63 $ 10,15 $ 1,44%

400,00 $ 36,94 $ 90,00 $ 119,50 $ 69,19 $ -$ 715,63 $ 10,15 $ 1,44%

400,00 $ 37,72 $ 97,50 $ 60,53 $ 70,09 $ 4,30 $ 670,14 $ 14,26 $ 2,17%

400,00 $ 37,72 $ 97,50 $ 121,05 $ 70,09 $ 4,30 $ 730,66 $ 15,03 $ 2,10%

400,00 $ 37,72 $ 97,50 $ 121,05 $ 70,09 $ 4,30 $ 730,66 $ 15,03 $ 2,10%

5.5. tudiants au statut de rdaction (Doctorat)


Liste des frais Facturs par session Frais de rdaction Frais gnraux 2007-2008 t Hiv. Aut. t 2008-2009 Hiv. Aut. t 2009-2010 Hiv. Aut. t 2010-2011 Hiv. Aut.

550,00 $ 36,00 $

550,00 $ 36,00 $

550,00 $ 36,00 $

550,00 $ 36,50 $

550,00 $ 36,50 $

550,00 $ 36,50 $

550,00 $ 36,94 $

550,00 $ 36,94 $

550,00 $ 36,94 $

550,00 $ 37,72 $

550,00 $ 37,72 $

550,00 $ 37,72 $

Erreur ! Source du renvoi introuvable. Fdration tudiante universitaire du Qubec - 2011

10

Frais technologiques Services aux tudiants Encadrement et promotion Copibec Total FIO 12 crdits Variation ($) Variation (%)

75,00 $ 58,20 $ 67,50 $ -$ 786,70 $

75,00 $ 116,40 $ 67,50 $ -$ 844,90 $

75,00 $ 116,40 $ 67,50 $ -$ 844,90 $

82,50 $ 59,04 $ 68,40 $ -$ 796,44 $ 9,74 $ 1,24%

82,50 $ 118,08 $ 68,40 $ -$ 855,48 $ 10,58 $ 1,25%

82,50 $ 118,08 $ 68,40 $ -$ 855,48 $ 10,58 $ 1,25%

90,00 $ 59,75 $ 69,19 $ -$ 805,88 $ 9,44 $ 1,19%

90,00 $ 119,50 $ 69,19 $ -$ 865,63 $ 10,15 $ 1,19%

97,50 $ 119,50 $ 69,19 $ -$ 865,63 $ 10,15 $ 1,19%

97,50 $ 60,53 $ 70,09 $ 4,30 $ 820,14 $ 14,26 $ 1,77%

97,50 $ 121,05 $ 70,09 $ 4,30 $ 880,66 $ 15,03 $ 1,74%

97,50 $ 121,05 $ 70,09 $ 4,30 $ 880,66 $ 15,03 $ 1,74%

5.6. Sources

HEC Montral. Financer sa matrise. [http://www.hec.ca/programmes_formations/msc/frais_bourses/index.html, consult le 23 juin 2009] HEC Montral. Financer votre B.A.A. HEC [http://www.hec.ca/programmes_formations/baa/frais_bourses/index.html, consult le 23 juin 2009] Montral.

HEC Montral. Ph. D. en administration Frais de scolarit. [http://www.hec.ca/programmes_formations/phd/financer_frais_scolarite/index.html, consult le 23 juin 2009] HEC Montral. Frais de scolarit. HEC Montral. [http://www.hec.ca/etudiant_actuel/financer/frais_scolarite/index.html, consult le 19 janvier 2011]

6. Institut national de la recherche scientifique


6.1. tudiants aux cycles suprieurs
Liste des frais 2007-2008 t Hiv. Aut. t 2008-2009 Hiv. Aut. t 2009-2010 Hiv. Aut. t 2010-2011 Hiv. Aut.

Erreur ! Source du renvoi introuvable. Fdration tudiante universitaire du Qubec - 2011

11

Facturs par session Frais gnraux Services aux tudiants Total FIO 15 crdits Variation ($) Variation (%)

20,00 $ -$

40,00 $ 25,55 $

40,00 $ 25,55 $

40,00 $ 25,55 $

40,00 $ 25,55 $

40,00 $ 25,55 $

40,00 $ 25,55 $

40,00 $ 25,55 $

40,00 $ 25,55 $

40,00 $ 25,55 $

40,00 $ 50,00 $

40,00 $ 50,00 $

20,00 $

65,55 $

65,55 $

65,55 $ 45,55 $ 227,75%

65,55 $ 0,00 $ 0,00%

65,55 $ 0,00 $ 0,00%

65,55 $ 0,00 $ 0,00%

65,55 $ 0,00 $ 0,00%

65,55 $ 0,00 $ 0,00%

65,55 $ 0,00 $ 0,00%

90,00 $ 24,45 $ 37,30%

90,00 $ 24,45 $ 37,30%

6.2. tudiants en rdaction


Liste des frais Facturs par session Frais de rdaction Frais gnraux Services aux tudiants Total FIO 15 crdits Variation ($) Variation (%) 2007-2008 t Hiv. Aut. t 2008-2009 Hiv. Aut. t 2009-2010 Hiv. Aut. t 2010-2011 Hiv. Aut.

70,00 $ 20,00 $ -$

120,00 $ 40,00 $ 25,55 $

170,00 $ 40,00 $ 25,55 $

220,00 $ 40,00 $ 25,55 $

270,00 $ 40,00 $ 25,55 $

300,00 $ 40,00 $ 25,55 $

300,00 $ 40,00 $ 25,55 $

300,00 $ 40,00 $ 25,55 $

300,00 $ 40,00 $ 25,55 $

300,00 $ 40,00 $ 25,55 $

300,00 $ 40,00 $ 50,00 $

300,00 $ 40,00 $ 50,00 $

90,00 $

185,55 $

235,55 $

285,55 $ 195,55 $ 217,28%

335,55 $ 150,00 $ 80,84%

365,55 $ 130,00 $ 55,19%

365,55 $ 80,00 $ 28,02%

365,55 $ 30,00 $ 8,94%

365,55 $ 0,00 $ 0,00%

365,55 $ 0,00 $ 0,00%

390,00 $ 24,45 $ 6,69%

390,00 $ 24,45 $ 6,69%

Erreur ! Source du renvoi introuvable. Fdration tudiante universitaire du Qubec - 2011

12

6.3. Sources

INRS. Conseil dadministration Rsolution 326A-2007-2754. emt.homelinux.net/wiki/images/3/36/Frais_INRS.pdf, consult le 19 juin 2009] INRS. Frais de scolarit et autres frais : Hiver 2008 : www.inrs.uquebec.ca/Francais/frais-H08.pdf, consult le 16 juin 2009. t 2008 : www.inrs.uquebec.ca/Francais/frais-E08.pdf, consult le 16 juin 2009. Automne 2008 : www.inrs.uquebec.ca/Francais/frais-A08.rtf, consult le 16 juin 2009. Hiver 2009 : www.inrs.uquebec.ca/Francais/frais-H09.rtf, consult le 16 juin 2009. t 2009 : www.inrs.uquebec.ca/Francais/frais-E09.rtf, consult le 16 juin 2009. Automne 2009 : http://www.inrs.uquebec.ca/Francais/frais-A09.rtf, consult le 16 juin 2009. Hiver 2011 : www.inrs.uquebec.ca/Francais/frais-H11.rtf, consult le 16 janvier 2011. t 2010 : www.inrs.uquebec.ca/Francais/frais-E10.rtf, consult le 16 janvier 2011.

[http://ceisme.inrs-

Automne 2010 : http://www.inrs.uquebec.ca/Francais/frais-A10.rtf, consult le 16 janvier 2011.

7. Universit Laval
7.1. tudiants au baccalaurat
Liste des frais Facturs par session Frais affrents Facturs par crdit Frais de gestion 56,76 $ 121,80 $ 121,80 $ 68,76 $ 133,80 $ 133,80 $ 68,76 $ 139,08 $ 139,08 $ 68,76 $ 141,48 $ 141,48 $ 2007-2008 t Hiv. Aut. t 2008-2009 Hiv. Aut. t 2009-2010 Hiv. Aut. t 2010-2011 Hiv. Aut.

2,50 $

4,50 $

4,50 $

2,25 $

4,50 $

4,50 $

2,25 $

4,88 $

4,88 $

3,08 $

5,55 $

5,55 $

Erreur ! Source du renvoi introuvable. Fdration tudiante universitaire du Qubec - 2011

13

Frais technologiques Module de gestion des tudes Total FIO 15 crdits Variation ($) Variation (%)

1,65 $

1,65 $

1,65 $

0,85 $

0,85 $

0,85 $

0,85 $

0,85 $

0,85 $

0,85 $

0,85 $

0,85 $

1,65 $

1,65 $

1,65 $

1,65 $

1,65 $

1,65 $

1,65 $

1,65 $

1,65 $

119,01 $

214,05 $

214,05 $

140,01 $ 21,00 $ 17,65%

238,80 $ 24,75 $ 11,56%

238,80 $ 24,75 $ 11,56%

140,01 $ 0,00 $ 0,00%

249,78 $ 10,98 $ 4,60%

249,78 $ 10,98 $ 4,60%

152,46 $ 12,45 $ 8,89%

262,23 $ 12,45 $ 4,98%

262,23 $ 12,45 $ 4,98%

7.1. tudiants aux cycles suprieurs


Liste des frais Facturs par session Frais affrents Facturs par crdit Frais de gestion Frais technologiques Module de gestion des tudes Total FIO 15 crdits Variation ($) Variation (%) 56,76 $ 121,80 $ 121,80 $ 68,76 $ 133,80 $ 133,80 $ 68,76 $ 139,08 $ 139,08 $ 68,76 $ 141,48 $ 141,48 $ 2007-2008 t Hiv. Aut. t 2008-2009 Hiv. Aut. t 2009-2010 Hiv. Aut. t 2010-2011 Hiv. Aut.

2,50 $ 1,65 $

4,50 $ 1,65 $

4,50 $ 1,65 $

2,25 $ 0,85 $ 1,65 $

4,50 $ 0,85 $ 1,65 $

4,50 $ 0,85 $ 1,65 $

2,25 $ 0,85 $ 1,65 $

4,88 $ 0,85 $ 1,65 $

4,88 $ 0,85 $ 1,65 $

3,08 $ 0,85 $ 1,65 $

5,55 $ 0,85 $ 1,65 $

5,55 $ 0,85 $ 1,65 $

119,01 $

214,05 $

214,05 $

140,01 $ 21,00 $ 17,65%

238,80 $ 24,75 $ 11,56%

238,80 $ 24,75 $ 11,56%

140,01 $ 0,00 $ 0,00%

249,78 $ 10,98 $ 4,60%

249,78 $ 10,98 $ 4,60%

152,46 $ 12,45 $ 8,89%

262,23 $ 12,45 $ 4,98%

262,23 $ 12,45 $ 4,98%

Erreur ! Source du renvoi introuvable. Fdration tudiante universitaire du Qubec - 2011

14

7.2. tudiants au statut de rdaction aux cycles suprieurs

Note : partir du 5e trimestre la matrise et du 9e trimestre au doctorat (pour un tudiant temps plein jusqu lanne 2009-2010 et pour la premire session de matrise tout comme les deux premires sessions au doctorat en 2010-2011)
Liste des frais Facturs par session Frais de rdaction I Frais affrents Frais de gestion Frais technologi ques Module de gestion des tudes Total FIO 15 crdits Variation ($) Variation (%) 2007-2008 t Hiv. Aut. t 2008-2009 Hiv. Aut. t 2009-2010 Hiv. Aut. t 2010-2011 Hiv. Aut.

108,00 $ 56,76 $ 30,00 $ 19,80 $

108,00 $ 121,80 $ 54,00 $ 19,80 $

108,00 $ 121,80 $ 54,00 $ 19,80 $

108,00 $ 68,76 $ 27,00 $ 10,20 $ 19,80 $

108,00 $ 133,80 $ 54,00 $ 10,20 $ 19,80 $ 325,80 $ 22,20 $ 7,31%

108,00 $ 133,80 $ 54,00 $ 10,20 $ 19,80 $ 325,80 $ 22,20 $ 7,31%

108,00 $ 68,76 $ 27,00 $ 10,20 $ 19,80 $ 233,76 $ 0,00 $ 0,00%

108,00 $ 139,08 $ 58,56 $ 10,20 $ 19,80 $ 335,64 $ 9,84 $ 3,02%

108,00 $ 139,08 $ 58,56 $ 10,20 $ 19,80 $ 335,64 $ 9,84 $ 3,02%

108,00 $ 68,76 $ 36,96 $ 10,20 $ 19,80 $ 243,72 $ 9,96 $ 4,26%

108,00 $ 141,48 $ 66,60 $ 10,20 $ 19,80 $ 346,08 $ 10,44 $ 3,11%

108,00 $ 141,48 $ 66,60 $ 10,20 $ 19,80 $ 346,08 $ 10,44 $ 3,11%

214,56 $

303,60 $

303,60 $

233,76 $ 19,20 $ 8,95%

7.3. tudiants au statut de rdaction

Note : partir du 6e trimestre la matrise et du 11e trimestre au doctorat (pour un tudiant temps plein jusquen 20092010 et pour lensemble des cycles suprieurs la suite de la premire session la matrise et de la deuxime session au doctorat en 2010-2011)
Liste des frais Facturs par session 2007-2008 t Hiv. Aut. t 2008-2009 Hiv. Aut. t 2009-2010 Hiv. Aut. t 2010-2011 Hiv. Aut.

Erreur ! Source du renvoi introuvable. Fdration tudiante universitaire du Qubec - 2011

15

Frais de rdaction I Frais affrents Frais de gestion Frais technologiques Module de gestion des tudes Total FIO 15 crdits Variation ($) Variation (%)

334,00 $ 56,76 $ 30,00 $ 19,80 $

334,00 $ 121,80 $ 54,00 $ 19,80 $

334,00 $ 121,80 $ 54,00 $ 19,80 $

334,00 $ 68,76 $ 27,00 $ 10,20 $

334,00 $ 133,80 $ 54,00 $ 10,20 $

334,00 $ 133,80 $ 54,00 $ 10,20 $

334,00 $ 68,76 $ 27,00 $ 10,20 $

334,00 $ 139,08 $ 58,56 $ 10,20 $

334,00 $ 139,08 $ 58,56 $ 10,20 $

334,00 $ 68,76 $ 36,96 $ 10,20 $

334,00 $ 141,48 $ 66,60 $ 10,20 $

334,00 $ 141,48 $ 66,60 $ 10,20 $

19,80 $ 440,56 $ 529,60 $ 529,60 $ 459,76 $ 19,20 $ 4,36%

19,80 $ 551,80 $ 22,20 $ 4,19%

19,80 $ 551,80 $ 22,20 $ 4,19%

19,80 $ 459,76 $ 0,00 $ 0,00%

19,80 $ 561,64 $ 9,84 $ 1,78%

19,80 $ 561,64 $ 9,84 $ 1,78%

19,80 $ 469,72 $ 9,96 $ 2,17%

19,80 $ 572,08 $ 10,44 $ 1,86%

19,80 $ 572,08 $ 10,44 $ 1,86%

Erreur ! Source du renvoi introuvable. Fdration tudiante universitaire du Qubec - 2011

16

7.4. Sources

Universit Laval. Calcul des droits de scolarit [http://www.sf.ulaval.ca/droitsscolarites/calcul_des_droits.htm, consult le 16 juin 2009]

et

autres

frais.

Universit Laval. Droits de scolarit Automne 2006 Hiver 2007. [http://www.sf.ulaval.ca/pdf/scol_que_authiv_0607.pdf, consult le 16 juin 2009] Universit Laval. Droits de scolarit Automne 2007 Hiver 2008. [http://www.sf.ulaval.ca/pdf/scol_que_authiv_0708.pdf, consult le 16 juin 2009] Universit Laval. Calcul des droits de scolarit et [http://www.sf.ulaval.ca/droitsscolarites/calcul_des_droits.htm, consult le 18 janvier 2009] Universit Laval. Calcul des droits de scolarit et [http://www.sf.ulaval.ca/droitsscolarites/calcul_des_droits.htm, consult le 22 janvier 2011] autres autres frais. frais.

8. Universit McGill
8.1. tudiants au baccalaurat
Liste des frais Facturs par session Student Services Fee Athletics and Recreation Fee Facturs par crdit Registration 6,78 $ 6,90 $ 6,90 $ 6,90 $ 7,04 $ 7,04 $ 7,04 $ 7,18 $ 7,18 $ 7,18 $ 7,18 $ 7,18 $ 2007-2008 t Hiv. Aut. t 2008-2009 Hiv. Aut. t 2009-2010 Hiv. Aut. t 2010-2011 Hiv. Aut.

-$ -$

115,50 $ 107,00 $

115,50 $ 107,00 $

-$ -$

125,50 $ 114,00 $

125,50 $ 114,00 $

-$ -$

133,00 $ 119,00 $

133,00 $ 119,00 $

-$ -$

133,00 $ 120,50 $

133,00 $ 120,50 $

Erreur ! Source du renvoi introuvable. Fdration tudiante universitaire du Qubec - 2011

17

Information Technology Transcript and Diploma Copyright Fee Total FIO 15 crdits Variation ($) Variation (%)

6,62 $ 1,20 $ 0,66 $

6,74 $ 1,22 $ 0,73 $

6,74 $ 1,22 $ 0,73 $

6,74 $ 1,22 $ 0,73 $

6,87 $ 1,25 $ 0,75 $

6,87 $ 1,25 $ 0,75 $

6,87 $ 1,25 $ 0,75 $

7,01 $ 1,28 $ 0,83 $

7,01 $ 1,28 $ 0,83 $

7,01 $ 1,28 $ 0,83 $

7,01 $ 1,28 $ 0,83 $

7,01 $ 1,28 $ 0,83 $

228,90 $

456,35 $

456,35 $

233,85 $ 4,95 $ 2,16%

478,15 $ 21,80 $ 4,78%

478,15 $ 21,80 $ 4,78%

238,65 $ 4,80 $ 2,05%

496,50 $ 18,35 $ 3,84%

496,50 $ 18,35 $ 3,84%

244,50 $ 5,85 $ 2,45%

498,00 $ 1,50 $ 0,30%

498,00 $ 1,50 $ 0,30%

8.2. tudiants aux cycles suprieurs (programmes facturs par crdit)


Liste des frais Facturs par session Student Services Fee Athletics and Recreation Fee Facturs par crdit Registration Information Technology Transcript and Diploma Copyright Fee Total FIO 15 crdits Variation ($) 6,78 $ 6,62 $ 1,20 $ 0,66 $ 228,90 $ 6,90 $ 6,74 $ 1,22 $ 0,73 $ 6,90 $ 6,74 $ 1,22 $ 0,73 $ 6,90 $ 6,74 $ 1,22 $ 0,73 $ 7,04 $ 6,87 $ 1,25 $ 0,75 $ 7,04 $ 6,87 $ 1,25 $ 0,75 $ 7,04 $ 6,87 $ 1,25 $ 0,75 $ 7,18 $ 7,01 $ 1,28 $ 0,83 $ 7,18 $ 7,01 $ 1,28 $ 0,83 $ 7,18 $ 7,01 $ 1,28 $ 0,83 $ 7,18 $ 7,01 $ 1,28 $ 0,83 $ 7,18 $ 7,01 $ 1,28 $ 0,83 $ 2007-2008 t Hiv. Aut. t 2008-2009 Hiv. Aut. t 2009-2010 Hiv. Aut. t 2010-2011 Hiv. Aut.

-$ -$

115,50 $ 107,00 $

115,50 $ 107,00 $

-$ -$

125,50 $ 114,00 $

125,50 $ 114,00 $

-$ -$

125,50 $ 114,00 $

125,50 $ 114,00 $

-$ -$

125,50 $ 115,50 $

125,50 $ 115,50 $

456,35 $

456,35 $

233,85 $ 4,95 $

478,15 $ 21,80 $

478,15 $ 21,80 $

238,65 $ 4,80 $

484,00 $ 5,85 $

484,00 $ 5,85 $

244,50 $ 5,85 $

485,50 $ 1,50 $

485,50 $ 1,50 $

Erreur ! Source du renvoi introuvable. Fdration tudiante universitaire du Qubec - 2011

18

Variation (%)

2,16%

4,78%

4,78%

2,05%

1,22%

1,22%

2,45%

0,31%

0,31%

8.3. tudiants aux cycles suprieurs (programmes facturation uniforme)


Liste des frais Facturs par session Student Services Fee Athletics and Recreation Fee Registration Information Technology Transcript and Diploma Copyright Fee Total FIO 15 crdits Variation ($) Variation (%) 2007-2008 t Hiv. Aut. t 2008-2009 Hiv. Aut. t 2009-2010 Hiv. Aut. t 2010-2011 Hiv. Aut.

-$ -$ 101,70 $ 99,30 $ 18,00 $ 9,90 $ 228,90 $

115,50 $ 107,00 $ 103,50 $ 101,10 $ 18,30 $ 10,95 $ 456,35 $

115,50 $ 107,00 $ 103,50 $ 101,10 $ 18,30 $ 10,95 $ 456,35 $

-$ -$ 103,50 $ 101,10 $ 18,30 $ 10,95 $ 233,85 $

125,50 $ 114,00 $ 105,60 $ 103,05 $ 18,75 $ 11,25 $ 478,15 $

125,50 $ 114,00 $ 105,60 $ 103,05 $ 18,75 $ 11,25 $ 478,15 $

-$ -$ 105,60 $ 103,05 $ 18,75 $ 11,25 $ 238,65 $

125,50 $ 114,00 $ 107,70 $ 105,15 $ 19,20 $ 12,45 $ 484,00 $

125,50 $ 114,00 $ 107,70 $ 105,15 $ 19,20 $ 12,45 $ 484,00 $

-$ -$ 107,70 $ 105,15 $ 19,20 $ 12,45 $ 244,50 $

125,50 $ 115,50 $ 107,70 $ 105,15 $ 19,20 $ 12,45 $ 485,50 $

125,50 $ 115,50 $ 107,70 $ 105,15 $ 19,20 $ 12,45 $ 485,50 $

4,95 $ 2,16%

21,80 $ 4,78%

21,80 $ 4,78%

4,80 $ 2,05%

5,85 $ 1,22%

5,85 $ 1,22%

5,85 $ 2,45%

1,50 $ 0,31%

1,50 $ 0,31%

8.4. tudiants au statut de rdaction


Liste des frais Facturs par session 2007-2008 t Hiv. Aut. t 2008-2009 Hiv. Aut. t 2009-2010 Hiv. Aut. t 2010-2011 Hiv. Aut.

Erreur ! Source du renvoi introuvable. Fdration tudiante universitaire du Qubec - 2011

19

Additionnal Session / Non-thesis extension Student Services Fee Athletics and Recreation Fee Registration Information Technology Transcript and Diploma Total FIO 15 crdits Variation ($) Variation (%)

-$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

884,00 $ 38,00 $ 36,00 $ 103,50 $ 101,10 $ 18,30 $

884,00 $ 38,00 $ 36,00 $ 103,50 $ 101,10 $ 18,30 $

-$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

934,00 $ 42,00 $ 38,00 $ 105,60 $ 103,50 $ 18,75 $

934,00 $ 42,00 $ 38,00 $ 105,60 $ 103,50 $ 18,75 $

-$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

984,00 $ 42,00 $ 38,00 $ 107,70 $ 105,15 $ 19,20 $

984,00 $ 42,00 $ 38,00 $ 107,70 $ 105,15 $ 19,20 $

-$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

984,00 $ 42,00 $ 38,50 $ 107,70 $ 105,15 $ 19,20 $

984,00 $ 42,00 $ 38,50 $ 107,70 $ 105,15 $ 19,20 $

-$

1 180,90 $

1 180,90 $

-$ -$ -

1 241,85 $ 60,95 $ 5,16%

1 241,85 $ 60,95 $ 5,16%

-$ -$ -

1 296,05 $ 54,20 $ 4,36%

1 296,05 $ 54,20 $ 4,36%

-$ -$ -

1 296,55 $ 0,50 $ 0,04%

1 296,55 $ 0,50 $ 0,04%

8.5. Sources

McGill University. Fee Information 2007-2008. accounts/FeeInformationBooklet2007.pdf, consult le 15 juin 2009] McGill University. Fee Information 2008-2009. accounts/FeeInformationBooklet2008.pdf, consult le 15 juin 2009] McGill University. 2007/2008 Fee Information Booklet accounts/2007addendum.pdf, consult le 15 juin 2009] McGill University. 2008/2009 Fee Information Booklet accounts/2008addendum.pdf, consult le 15 juin 2009] Addendum. Addendum.

[http://www.mcgill.ca/files/student[http://www.mcgill.ca/files/student[http://www.mcgill.ca/files/student[http://www.mcgill.ca/files/student-

Erreur ! Source du renvoi introuvable. Fdration tudiante universitaire du Qubec - 2011

20

McGill University. Schedule of Fees Summer 2009. [http://www.mcgill.ca/student-accounts/summerfees/, consult le 15 juin 2009] McGill University. Schedule of Fees 2009-2010. [http://www.mcgill.ca/student-accounts/fees/, consult le 15 juin 2009] McGill University. Tuition and fees; Summer 2010. [http://www.mcgill.ca/student-accounts/summerfees/, consult le 20 janvier 2011] McGill University. Schedule of Fees 2010-2011. [http://www.mcgill.ca/student-accounts/fees/, consult le 20 janvier 2011]

9. cole polytechnique de Montral


9.1. tudiants au baccalaurat
Liste des frais Facturs par session Services aux tudiants Frais technologiques Droits d'auteur Frais gnraux 2007-2008 t Hiv. Aut. t 2008-2009 Hiv. Aut. t 2009-2010 Hiv. Aut. t 2010-2011 Hiv. Aut.

-$ -$ -$ -$

75,00 $ 60,00 $ 10,00 $ 55,00 $

75,00 $ 60,00 $ 10,00 $ 55,00 $

75,00 $ 60,00 $ 12,75 $ 62,25 $

75,00 $ 60,00 $ 12,75 $ 62,25 $

75,00 $ 60,00 $ 12,75 $ 62,25 $

87,65 $ 60,00 $ 12,75 $ 67,25 $

87,65 $ 60,00 $ 12,75 $ 67,25 $

87,65 $ 60,00 $ 12,75 $ 67,25 $

95,15 $ 60,00 $ 12,75 $ 72,25 $

95,15 $ 60,00 $ 12,75 $ 72,25 $

95,15 $ 60,00 $ 12,75 $ 72,25 $

Total FIO 15 crdits Variation ($) Variation (%)

-$

200,00 $

200,00 $

210,00 $ 210,00 $ -

210,00 $ 10,00 $ 5,00%

210,00 $ 10,00 $ 5,00%

227,65 $ 17,65 $ 8,40%

227,65 $ 17,65 $ 8,40%

227,65 $ 17,65 $ 8,40%

240,15 $ 12,50 $ 5,49%

240,15 $ 12,50 $ 5,49%

240,15 $ 12,50 $ 5,49%

Erreur ! Source du renvoi introuvable. Fdration tudiante universitaire du Qubec - 2011

21

9.2. tudiants aux cycles suprieurs


Liste des frais Facturs par session Services aux tudiants Frais technologiques Droits d'auteur Frais gnraux 2007-2008 t Hiv. Aut. t 2008-2009 Hiv. Aut. t 2009-2010 Hiv. Aut. t 2010-2011 Hiv. Aut.

-$ -$ -$ -$

75,00 $ 60,00 $ 10,00 $ 55,00 $

75,00 $ 60,00 $ 10,00 $ 55,00 $

-$ -$ -$ -$

75,00 $ 60,00 $ 12,75 $ 62,25 $

75,00 $ 60,00 $ 12,75 $ 62,25 $

-$ -$ -$ -$

87,65 $ 60,00 $ 12,75 $ 67,25 $

87,65 $ 60,00 $ 12,75 $ 67,25 $

-$ -$ -$ -$

95,15 $ 60,00 $ 12,75 $ 72,25 $

95,15 $ 60,00 $ 12,75 $ 72,25 $

Total FIO 15 crdits Variation ($) Variation (%)

-$

200,00 $

200,00 $

-$ -$ -

210,00 $ 10,00 $ 5,00%

210,00 $ 10,00 $ 5,00%

-$ -$ -

227,65 $ 17,65 $ 8,40%

227,65 $ 17,65 $ 8,40%

-$ -$ -

240,15 $ 12,50 $ 5,49%

240,15 $ 12,50 $ 5,49%

9.3. tudiants au statut de rdaction


Liste des frais Facturs par session Frais de rdaction Services aux tudiants Frais technologiques Droits d'auteur Frais gnraux 2007-2008 t Hiv. Aut. t 2008-2009 Hiv. Aut. t 2009-2010 Hiv. Aut. t 2010-2011 Hiv. Aut.

663,08 $ -$ -$ -$ -$

663,08 $ 75,00 $ 60,00 $ 10,00 $ 55,00 $

663,08 $ 75,00 $ 60,00 $ 10,00 $ 55,00 $

700,54 $ -$ -$ -$ -$

700,54 $ 75,00 $ 60,00 $ 12,75 $ 62,25 $

700,54 $ 75,00 $ 60,00 $ 12,75 $ 62,25 $

700,54 $ -$ -$ -$ -$

700,54 $ 87,65 $ 60,00 $ 12,75 $ 67,25 $

700,54 $ 87,65 $ 60,00 $ 12,75 $ 67,25 $

700,54 $ -$ -$ -$ -$

700,54 $ 95,15 $ 60,00 $ 12,75 $ 72,25 $

700,54 $ 95,15 $ 60,00 $ 12,75 $ 72,25 $

Erreur ! Source du renvoi introuvable. Fdration tudiante universitaire du Qubec - 2011

22

Total FIO 15 crdits Variation ($) Variation (%)

663,08 $

863,08 $

863,08 $

700,54 $ 37,46 $ 5,65%

910,54 $ 47,46 $ 5,50%

910,54 $ 47,46 $ 5,50%

700,54 $ 0,00 $ 0,00%

928,19 $ 17,65 $ 1,94%

928,19 $ 17,65 $ 1,94%

700,54 $ 0,00 $ 0,00%

940,69 $ 12,50 $ 1,35%

940,69 $ 12,50 $ 1,35%

9.4. Sources

cole polytechnique de Montral. Droits de scolarit tudes au premier cycle 2009-2010. [http://www.polymtl.ca/registrariat/docweb/Baccalaureat_DROITS_DE_SCOLARITE.pdf, consult le 20 juillet 2009] cole polytechnique de Montral. Droits de scolarit tudes suprieures 2009-2010. [http://www.polymtl.ca/registrariat/docweb/EtudesSuperieures_DROITS_DE_SCOLARITE.pdf, consult le 20 juillet 2009] cole polytechnique de Montral. Droits de scolarit tudes au premier cycle 2008-2009. [http://www.polymtl.ca/registrariat/docweb/Baccalaureat_DROITS_DE_SCOLARITE.pdf, consult le 15 juillet 2009] cole polytechnique de Montral. Droits de scolarit tudes suprieures 2008-2009. [http://www.polymtl.ca/registrariat/docweb/EtudesSuperieures_DROITS_DE_SCOLARITE.pdf, consult le 15 juin 2009] cole polytechnique de Montral. Droits de scolarit tudes au premier cycle 2007-2008. [http://www.polymtl.ca/registrariat/docweb/Baccalaureat_DROITS_DE_SCOLARITE.pdf, consult le 15 juin 2009] cole polytechnique de Montral. Droits de scolarit tudes suprieures 2007-2008. [http://www.polymtl.ca/registrariat/docweb/EtudesSuperieures_DROITS_DE_SCOLARITE.pdf, consult le 15 juin 2009] cole polytechnique de Montral. Droits de scolarit tudes suprieures 2010-2011. [http://www.polymtl.ca/registrariat/frais/es.php, consult le 22 janvier 2011]

Erreur ! Source du renvoi introuvable. Fdration tudiante universitaire du Qubec - 2011

23

10. Universit de Montral


10.1. tudiants au baccalaurat
Liste des frais Facturs par crdit Services aux tudiants Frais de gestion Droits d'auteur Total FIO 15 crdits Variation ($) Variation (%) 2007-2008 t Hiv. Aut. t 2008-2009 Hiv. Aut. t 2009-2010 Hiv. Aut. t 2010-2011 Hiv. Aut.

7,00 $ 5,00 $ 0,38 $

7,00 $ 5,00 $ 0,41 $

7,00 $ 5,00 $ 0,41 $

7,00 $ 6,67 $ 0,41 $

7,00 $ 6,67 $ 0,46 $

7,00 $ 6,67 $ 0,46 $

8,50 $ 7,08 $ 0,46 $

8,50 $ 7,08 $ 0,51 $

8,50 $ 7,08 $ 0,51 $

8,50 $ 7,86 $ 0,50 $

8,50 $ 8,22 $ 0,55 $

8,50 $ 7,77 $ 0,55 $

185,70 $

186,15 $

186,15 $

211,20 $ 25,50 $ 13,73%

211,95 $ 25,80 $ 13,86%

211,95 $ 25,80 $ 13,86%

240,60 $ 29,40 $ 13,92%

241,35 $ 29,40 $ 13,87%

241,35 $ 29,40 $ 13,87%

252,90 $ 12,30 $ 5,11%

259,05 $ 17,70 $ 7,33%

252,30 $ 10,95 $ 4,54%

10.2. tudiants aux cycles suprieurs


Liste des frais Facturs par session Services aux tudiants Frais de gestion Droits d'auteur Total FIO 15 crdits Variation ($) 2007-2008 t Hiv. Aut. t 2008-2009 Hiv. Aut. t 2009-2010 Hiv. Aut. t 2010-2011 Hiv. Aut.

105,00 $ 75,00 $ 5,70 $

105,00 $ 75,00 $ 6,15 $

105,00 $ 75,00 $ 6,15 $

105,00 $ 100,05 $ 6,15 $

105,00 $ 100,05 $ 6,90 $

105,00 $ 100,05 $ 6,90 $

127,50 $ 106,20 $ 6,90 $

127,50 $ 106,20 $ 7,65 $

127,50 $ 106,20 $ 7,65 $

127,50 $ 117,90 $ 7,50 $

127,50 $ 123,30 $ 8,25 $

127,50 $ 116,55 $ 8,25 $

185,70 $

186,15 $

186,15 $

211,20 $ 25,50 $

211,95 $ 25,80 $

211,95 $ 25,80 $

240,60 $ 29,40 $

241,35 $ 29,40 $

241,35 $ 29,40 $

252,90 $ 12,30 $

259,05 $ 17,70 $

252,30 $ 10,95 $

Erreur ! Source du renvoi introuvable. Fdration tudiante universitaire du Qubec - 2011

24

Variation (%)

13,73%

13,86%

13,86%

13,92%

13,87%

13,87%

5,11%

7,33%

4,54%

10.3. tudiants au statut de rdaction


Liste des frais Facturs par session Frais de rdaction Total FIO 15 crdits Variation ($) Variation (%) 2007-2008 t Hiv. Aut. t 2008-2009 Hiv. Aut. t 2009-2010 Hiv. Aut. t 2010-2011 Hiv. Aut.

312,00 $

312,00 $

312,00 $

312,00 $

337,00 $

337,00 $

349,50 $

349,50 $

349,50 $

374,50 $

387,00 $

362,00 $

312,00 $

312,00 $

312,00 $

312,00 $ 0,00 $ 0,00%

337,00 $ 25,00 $ 8,01%

337,00 $ 25,00 $ 8,01%

349,50 $ 37,50 $ 12,02%

349,50 $ 12,50 $ 3,71%

349,50 $ 12,50 $ 3,71%

362,00 $ 25,00 $ 7,15%

362,00 $ 37,50 $ 10,73%

362,00 $ 12,50 $ 3,58%

10.4. Sources

Universit de Montral. Payer ses tudes Autres frais exigibles. [http://www.etudes.umontreal.ca/payeretudes/frais.html, consult le 15 juin 2009] Universit de Montral. Rglements relatif aux droits de scolarit et autres frais exigibles des tudiants (2009-2010). [http://www.direction.umontreal.ca/secgen/pdf/reglem/francais/sec_20/regl20_1.pdf, consult le 15 juin 2009] Universit de Montral. Rglements relatif aux droits de scolarit et autres frais exigibles des tudiants (2008-2009). [http://www.etudes.umontreal.ca/publications/annu_pdf/2008-2009/drscol.pdf, consult le 15 juin 2009] Universit de Montral. Rglements relatif aux droits de scolarit et autres frais exigibles des tudiants (2007-2008). [http://www.etudes.umontreal.ca/publications/annu_pdf/2007-2008/drscol.pdf, consult le 15 juin 2009] Universit de Montral. Renseignements gnraux (2006-2007). [http://www.etudes.umontreal.ca/publications/annu_pdf/2006-2007/fesrgl.pdf, consult le 19 juin 2009]

Erreur ! Source du renvoi introuvable. Fdration tudiante universitaire du Qubec - 2011

25

Universit de Montral. Payer ses tudes Autres frais exigibles. [http://www.etudes.umontreal.ca/payeretudes/frais.html, consult le 22 janvier 2011]

11. Universit du Qubec Chicoutimi


11.1. tudiants au baccalaurat et aux cycles suprieurs
Liste des frais Facturs par session Frais gnraux Facturs par crdit Services aux tudiants Droits dauteur Frais technologiques 20,00 $ 40,00 $ 40,00 $ 40,00 $ 40,64 $ 40,64 $ 40,64 $ 41,49 $ 41,49 $ 41,49 $ 41,74 $ 41,74 $ 2007-2008 t Hiv. Aut. t 2008-2009 Hiv. Aut. t 2009-2010 Hiv. Aut. t 2010-2011 Hiv. Aut.

3,15 $ 0,60 $ -$

5,15 $ 0,60 $ 4,00 $

5,15 $ 0,60 $ 4,00 $

3,15 $ 0,60 $ 4,00 $

5,23 $ 0,60 $ 4,06 $

5,23 $ 0,60 $ 4,06 $

3,20 $ 0,60 $ 4,06 $

5,23 $ 0,60 $ 4,15 $

5,23 $ 0,60 $ 4,15 $

3,20 $ 0,60 $ 4,15 $

5,23 $ 0,60 $ 4,18 $

5,23 $ 0,60 $ 4,18 $

Total FIO 15 crdits Variation ($) Variation (%)

76,25 $

186,25 $

186,25 $

156,25 $ 80,00 $ 104,92%

188,99 $ 2,74 $ 1,47%

188,99 $ 2,74 $ 1,47%

158,54 $ 2,29 $ 1,47%

191,19 $ 2,20 $ 1,16%

191,19 $ 2,20 $ 1,16%

160,74 $ 2,20 $ 1,39%

191,89 $ 0,70 $ 0,37%

191,89 $ 0,70 $ 0,37%

11.2. tudiants au statut de rdaction


Liste des frais Facturs par session Frais de rdaction 2007-2008 t Hiv. Aut. t 2008-2009 Hiv. Aut. t 2009-2010 Hiv. Aut. t 2010-2011 Hiv. Aut.

70,00 $

200,00 $

200,00 $

200,00 $

203,20 $

203,20 $

203,20 $

203,20 $

203,20 $

203,20 $

203,20 $

203,20 $

Erreur ! Source du renvoi introuvable. Fdration tudiante universitaire du Qubec - 2011

26

Frais gnraux Total FIO 15 crdits Variation ($) Variation (%)

20,00 $

40,00 $

40,00 $

40,00 $

40,64 $

40,64 $

40,64 $

41,49 $

41,49 $

41,49 $

41,49 $

41,49 $

90,00 $

240,00 $

240,00 $

240,00 $ 150,00 $ 166,67%

243,84 $ 3,84 $ 1,60%

243,84 $ 3,84 $ 1,60%

243,84 $ 3,84 $ 1,60%

244,69 $ 0,85 $ 0,35%

244,69 $ 0,85 $ 0,35%

244,69 $ 0,85 $ 0,35%

244,69 $ 0,00 $ 0,00%

244,69 $ 0,00 $ 0,00%

11.3. Sources

UQAC. Droits de scolarit et autres frais. [http://www.uqac.ca/direction_services/registraire/adm_inscriptions/frais_scolarite.php, consult le 16 juin 2009] UQAC. Droits de scolarit et autres frais. [http://www.uqac.ca/direction_services/registraire/adm_inscriptions/frais_scolarite.php, consult le 22 janvier 2011] 12. Universit du Qubec Montral
12.1. tudiants au baccalaurat et aux cycles suprieurs
Liste des frais Facturs par session Frais gnraux Centre sportif Facturs par crdit Services la vie tudiante Frais technologiques Centre sportif 40,00 $ -$ 40,00 $ -$ 40,00 $ -$ 40,88 $ -$ 40,88 $ 40,00 $ 40,88 $ 40,00 $ 49,00 $ -$ 49,00 $ 40,00 $ 49,00 $ 40,00 $ 49,15 $ -$ 62,20 $ 40,00 $ 62,20 $ 40,00 $ 2007-2008 t Hiv. Aut. t 2008-2009 Hiv. Aut. t 2009-2010 Hiv. Aut. t 2010-2011 Hiv. Aut.

3,45 $ -$ -$

3,45 $ 4,00 $ 3,36 $

3,45 $ 4,00 $ 3,36 $

3,45 $ 4,09 $ -$

3,45 $ 4,09 $ -$

3,45 $ 4,09 $ -$

3,45 $ 4,18 $ -$

3,45 $ 4,18 $ -$

3,45 $ 4,18 $ -$

3,45 $ 4,19 $ -$

3,45 $ 4,19 $ -$

3,45 $ 4,19 $ -$

Erreur ! Source du renvoi introuvable. Fdration tudiante universitaire du Qubec - 2011

27

Total FIO 15 crdits Variation ($) Variation (%)

91,75 $

192,07 $

192,07 $

153,98 $ 62,23 $ 67,83%

193,98 $ 1,91 $ 0,99%

193,98 $ 1,91 $ 0,99%

163,45 $ 9,47 $ 6,15%

203,45 $ 9,47 $ 4,88%

203,45 $ 9,47 $ 4,88%

163,75 $ 0,30 $ 0,18%

216,80 $ 13,35 $ 6,56%

216,80 $ 13,35 $ 6,56%

12.2. tudiants au statut de rdaction


Liste des frais Facturs par session Frais de rdaction Frais gnraux Total FIO 15 crdits Variation ($) Variation (%) 2007-2008 t Hiv. Aut. t 2008-2009 Hiv. Aut. t 2009-2010 Hiv. Aut. t 2010-2011 Hiv. Aut.

300,00 $ 40,00 $

300,00 $ 40,00 $

300,00 $ 40,00 $

306,60 $ 40,88 $

306,60 $ 40,88 $

306,60 $ 40,88 $

313,65 $ 49,00 $

313,65 $ 49,00 $

313,65 $ 49,00 $

314,59 $ 49,15 $

314,59 $ 62,20 $

314,59 $ 62,20 $

340,00 $

340,00 $

340,00 $

347,48 $ 7,48 $ 2,20%

347,48 $ 7,48 $ 2,20%

347,48 $ 7,48 $ 2,20%

362,65 $ 15,17 $ 4,37%

362,65 $ 15,17 $ 4,37%

362,65 $ 15,17 $ 4,37%

363,74 $ 1,09 $ 0,30%

376,79 $ 14,14 $ 3,90%

376,79 $ 14,14 $ 3,90%

12.3. Sources

UQAM. Droits de scolarit et autres frais. [http://www.unites.uqam.ca/ifinance/frais.html, consult le 17 juin 2009] UQAM. Droits de scolarit et autres frais. [http://www.servicesfinanciers.uqam.ca/droits-de-scolarite-et-autres-frais.html, consult le 22 janvier 2011] UQAM. tudiants internationaux Droits de scolarit et connexes pour un trimestre (2009-2010). [http://www.vieetudiante.uqam.ca/etudiantsinternationaux/Documents/infos-frais-scolarite.pdf, consult le 17 juin 2009] Note : en 2007-2008, les frais associs au centre sportif taient plafonns 12 crdits

Erreur ! Source du renvoi introuvable. Fdration tudiante universitaire du Qubec - 2011

28

13. Universit du Qubec Rimouski Il a t impossible dobtenir de lUQAR les barmes de frais institutionnels obligatoires pour 2009-2010. Afin de brosser un portrait raliste de la situation, une projection base sur un scnario dindexation lIPC (conformment la procdure applique en 2008-2009) est prsente ici (taux de 2,09%, tel quappliqu lUQAC et lUQTR).
13.1. tudiants au baccalaurat et aux cycles suprieurs
Liste des frais Facturs par session Frais gnraux (partie fixe) Vie tudiante Facturs par crdit Frais gnraux (partie variable) Services aux tudiants Frais technologiques Droits dauteur Total FIO 15 crdits Variation ($) Variation (%) -$ 20,00 $ 40,00 $ 20,00 $ 40,00 $ 20,00 $ -$ 20,32 $ 40,64 $ 20,32 $ 40,64 $ 20,32 $ -$ 20,74 $ 41,49 $ 20,74 $ 41,49 $ 20,74 $ 23,25 $ 20,75 $ 23,25 $ 20,75 $ 23,25 $ 20,75 $ 2007-2008 t Hiv. Aut. t 2008-2009 Hiv. Aut. t 2009-2010 Hiv. Aut. t 2010-2011 Hiv. Aut.

-$ 2,23 $ 4,00 $ 0,78 $ 125,15 $

-$ 2,23 $ 4,00 $ 0,78 $ 165,15 $

-$ 2,23 $ 4,00 $ 0,78 $ 165,15 $

-$ 2,27 $ 4,06 $ 0,78 $ 126,97 $ 1,82 $ 1,45%

-$ 2,27 $ 4,06 $ 0,78 $ 167,61 $ 2,46 $ 1,49%

-$ 2,27 $ 4,06 $ 0,78 $ 167,61 $ 2,46 $ 1,49%

-$ 2,32 $ 4,14 $ 0,80 $ 129,62 $ 2,65 $ 2,09%

-$ 2,32 $ 4,14 $ 0,80 $ 171,11 $ 3,50 $ 2,09%

-$ 2,32 $ 4,14 $ 0,80 $ 171,11 $ 3,50 $ 2,09%

2,25 $ 3,05 $ 4,15 $ 0,78 $ 197,45 $ 67,83 $ 52,33%

2,25 $ 3,05 $ 4,15 $ 0,78 $ 197,45 $ 26,34 $ 15,39%

2,25 $ 3,05 $ 4,15 $ 0,78 $ 197,45 $ 26,34 $ 15,39%

13.2. tudiants au statut de rdaction

Note : partir du 4e trimestre la matrise et du 7e trimestre au doctorat (pour un tudiant temps plein)
Liste des frais 2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011

Erreur ! Source du renvoi introuvable. Fdration tudiante universitaire du Qubec - 2011

29

t Facturs par session Frais de rdaction Frais gnraux Cotisation la vie tudiante Total FIO 15 crdits Variation ($) Variation (%)

Hiv.

Aut.

Hiv.

Aut.

Hiv.

Aut.

Hiv.

Aut.

70,00 $ -$ -$ 70,00 $

70,00 $ 40,00 $ -$ 110,00 $

70,00 $ 40,00 $ -$ 110,00 $

71,12 $ -$ -$ 71,12 $ 1,12 $ 1,60%

71,12 $ 40,64 $ -$ 111,76 $ 1,76 $ 1,60%

71,12 $ 40,64 $ -$ 111,76 $ 1,76 $ 1,60%

72,61 $ -$ -$ 72,61 $ 1,49 $ 2,09%

72,61 $ 41,49 $ -$ 114,10 $ 2,34 $ 2,09%

72,61 $ 41,49 $ -$ 114,10 $ 2,34 $ 2,09%

72,61 $ -$ -$ 72,61 $ 0,00 $ 0,00%

72,61 $ 23,25 $ 5,00 $ 100,86 $ (13,24 $) -11,60%

72,61 $ 23,25 $ 5,00 $ 100,86 $ (13,24 $) -11,60%

13.1.

tudiants au statut de rdaction

Note : partir du 7e trimestre la matrise et du 10e trimestre au doctorat (pour un tudiant temps plein)
Liste des frais Facturs par session Frais de rdaction Frais gnraux Cotisation la vie tudiante Total FIO 15 crdits Variation ($) Variation (%) 2007-2008 t Hiv. Aut. t 2008-2009 Hiv. Aut. t 2009-2010 Hiv. Aut. t 2010-2011 Hiv. Aut.

200,00 $ -$ -$ 200,00 $

200,00 $ 40,00 $ -$ 240,00 $

200,00 $ 40,00 $ -$ 240,00 $

203,20 $ -$ -$ 203,20 $ 3,20 $ 1,60%

203,20 $ 40,64 $ -$ 243,84 $ 3,84 $ 1,60%

203,20 $ 40,64 $ -$ 243,84 $ 3,84 $ 1,60%

207,45 $ -$ -$ 207,45 $ 4,25 $ 2,09%

207,45 $ 41,49 $ -$ 248,94 $ 5,10 $ 2,09%

207,45 $ 41,49 $ -$ 248,94 $ 5,10 $ 2,09%

207,47 $ -$ -$ 207,47 $ 0,02 $ 0,01%

207,47 $ 23,25 $ 5,00 $ 235,72 $ (13,22 $) -5,31%

207,47 $ 23,25 $ 5,00 $ 235,72 $ (13,22 $) -5,31%

Erreur ! Source du renvoi introuvable. Fdration tudiante universitaire du Qubec - 2011

30

13.2. Sources

UQAR. Service des finances : Frais de scolarit. [http://www.uqar.uquebec.ca/services/finances/fraisScolarite/index.asp, consult le 20 juin 2009] UQAR. Service des finances : Frais de scolarit. [http://www.uqar.uquebec.ca/services/finances/fraisScolarite/index.asp, consult le 22 janvier 2011]

14. Universit du Qubec en Abitibi-Tmiscamingue


14.1. tudiants au baccalaurat
Liste des frais Facturs par session Frais dinscription Vie tudiante Facturs par crdit Services aux tudiants Frais technologiques Droits dauteur Total FIO 15 crdits Variation ($) Variation (%) 2007-2008 t Hiv. Aut. t 2008-2009 Hiv. Aut. t 2009-2010 Hiv. Aut. t 2010-2011 Hiv. Aut.

40,00 $ 20,00 $

40,00 $ 20,00 $

40,00 $ 20,00 $

40,00 $ 20,00 $

40,00 $ 20,00 $

40,00 $ 20,00 $

42,50 $ 20,00 $

42,50 $ 20,00 $

42,50 $ 20,00 $

45,00 $ 20,00 $

45,00 $ 20,00 $

45,00 $ 20,00 $

2,23 $ 4,00 $ 0,60 $

2,23 $ 4,00 $ 0,60 $

2,23 $ 4,00 $ 0,60 $

2,23 $ 4,00 $ 0,60 $

2,23 $ 4,00 $ 0,75 $

2,23 $ 4,00 $ 0,75 $

2,23 $ 5,00 $ 0,75 $

2,23 $ 5,00 $ 0,75 $

2,23 $ 5,00 $ 0,75 $

3,25 $ 5,00 $ 0,75 $

3,25 $ 5,00 $ 0,75 $

3,25 $ 5,00 $ 0,75 $

162,45 $

162,45 $

162,45 $

162,45 $ -$ 0,00%

164,70 $ 2,25 $ 1,39%

164,70 $ 2,25 $ 1,39%

182,20 $ 19,75 $ 12,16%

182,20 $ 17,50 $ 10,63%

182,20 $ 17,50 $ 10,63%

200,00 $ 17,80 $ 9,77%

200,00 $ 17,80 $ 9,77%

200,00 $ 17,80 $ 9,77%

Erreur ! Source du renvoi introuvable. Fdration tudiante universitaire du Qubec - 2011

31

14.2. tudiants aux cycles suprieurs (profil professionnel)

Note : partir de lanne 2010-2011 les profils professionnel et recherche ont t distingus par ladministration de lUQAT autant sur le plan acadmique que dans la facturation.
Liste des frais Facturs par session Frais dinscription Vie tudiante Facturs par crdit Services aux tudiants Frais technologiques Droits dauteur Total FIO 15 crdits Variation ($) Variation (%) 2007-2008 t Hiv. Aut. t 2008-2009 Hiv. Aut. t 2009-2010 Hiv. Aut. t 2010-2011 Hiv. Aut.

40,00 $ 20,00 $

40,00 $ 20,00 $

40,00 $ 20,00 $

40,00 $ 20,00 $

40,00 $ 20,00 $

40,00 $ 20,00 $

42,50 $ 20,00 $

42,50 $ 20,00 $

42,50 $ 20,00 $

45,00 $ 20,00 $

45,00 $ 20,00 $

45,00 $ 20,00 $

2,23 $ 8,00 $ 0,60 $

2,23 $ 8,00 $ 0,60 $

2,23 $ 8,00 $ 0,60 $

2,23 $ 8,00 $ 0,60 $

2,23 $ 8,00 $ 0,75 $

2,23 $ 8,00 $ 0,75 $

2,23 $ 9,00 $ 0,75 $

2,23 $ 9,00 $ 0,75 $

2,23 $ 9,00 $ 0,75 $

3,25 $ 5,00 $ 0,75 $

3,25 $ 5,00 $ 0,75 $

3,25 $ 5,00 $ 0,75 $

222,45 $

222,45 $

222,45 $

222,45 $ -$ 0,00%

224,70 $ 2,25 $ 1,01%

224,70 $ 2,25 $ 1,01%

242,20 $ 19,75 $ 8,88%

242,20 $ 17,50 $ 7,79%

242,20 $ 17,50 $ 7,79%

200,00 $ (42,20 $) -17,42%

200,00 $ (42,20 $) -17,42%

200,00 $ (42,20 $) -17,42%

14.3. tudiants aux cycles suprieurs (profil recherche)


Liste des frais Facturs par session Frais dinscription Vie tudiante 2007-2008 t Hiv. Aut. t 2008-2009 Hiv. Aut. t 2009-2010 Hiv. Aut. t 2010-2011 Hiv. Aut.

40,00 $ 20,00 $

40,00 $ 20,00 $

40,00 $ 20,00 $

40,00 $ 20,00 $

40,00 $ 20,00 $

40,00 $ 20,00 $

42,50 $ 20,00 $

42,50 $ 20,00 $

42,50 $ 20,00 $

45,00 $ 20,00 $

45,00 $ 20,00 $

45,00 $ 20,00 $

Erreur ! Source du renvoi introuvable. Fdration tudiante universitaire du Qubec - 2011

32

Facturs par crdit Services aux tudiants Frais technologiques Droits dauteur Total FIO 15 crdits Variation ($) Variation (%)

2,23 $ 8,00 $ 0,60 $

2,23 $ 8,00 $ 0,60 $

2,23 $ 8,00 $ 0,60 $

2,23 $ 8,00 $ 0,60 $

2,23 $ 8,00 $ 0,75 $

2,23 $ 8,00 $ 0,75 $

2,23 $ 9,00 $ 0,75 $

2,23 $ 9,00 $ 0,75 $

2,23 $ 9,00 $ 0,75 $

3,25 $ 10,00 $ 0,75 $

3,25 $ 10,00 $ 0,75 $

3,25 $ 10,00 $ 0,75 $

222,45 $

222,45 $

222,45 $

222,45 $ -$ 0,00%

224,70 $ 2,25 $ 1,01%

224,70 $ 2,25 $ 1,01%

242,20 $ 19,75 $ 8,88%

242,20 $ 17,50 $ 7,79%

242,20 $ 17,50 $ 7,79%

275,00 $ 32,80 $ 13,54%

275,00 $ 32,80 $ 13,54%

275,00 $ 32,80 $ 13,54%

14.4. tudiants au statut de rdaction

Note : partir du 4e trimestre la matrise et du 7e trimestre au doctorat (pour un tudiant temps plein)
Liste des frais Facturs par session Frais de rdaction Frais d'inscription Vie tudiante Total FIO 15 crdits Variation ($) Variation (%) 2007-2008 t Hiv. Aut. t 2008-2009 Hiv. Aut. t 2009-2010 Hiv. Aut. t 2010-2011 Hiv. Aut.

70,00 $ 40,00 $ 20,00 $

70,00 $ 40,00 $ 20,00 $

70,00 $ 40,00 $ 20,00 $

70,00 $ 40,00 $ 20,00 $

250,00 $ 40,00 $ 20,00 $

250,00 $ 40,00 $ 20,00 $

250,00 $ 42,50 $ 20,00 $

250,00 $ 42,50 $ 20,00 $

250,00 $ 42,50 $ 20,00 $

250,00 $ 45,00 $ 20,00 $

250,00 $ 45,00 $ 20,00 $

250,00 $ 45,00 $ 20,00 $

130,00 $

130,00 $

130,00 $

130,00 $ -$ 0,00%

310,00 $ 180,00 $ 138,46%

310,00 $ 180,00 $ 138,46%

312,50 $ 182,50 $ 140,38%

312,50 $ 2,50 $ 0,81%

312,50 $ 2,50 $ 0,81%

315,00 $ 2,50 $ 0,80%

315,00 $ 2,50 $ 0,80%

315,00 $ 2,50 $ 0,80%

Erreur ! Source du renvoi introuvable. Fdration tudiante universitaire du Qubec - 2011

33

14.5.

Sources

UQAT. Droits de scolarit. [http://www.uqat.ca/Repertoire/fraisdescolarite.asp, consult le 17 juin 2009] UQAT. Guide dinscription 2008-2009. [http://www.uqat.ca/Repertoire/Telechargements/guide_inscrip.pdf, consult le 17 juin 2009] UQAT. Droits de scolarit. [http://www.uqat.ca/etudes/admission/?menu=frais, consult le 22 janvier 2011] Informations transmises directement par le service des finances de lUQAT : grilles de calcul des frais de scolarit et autres pour les annes 2007-08, 2008-09 et 2009-10.

Erreur ! Source du renvoi introuvable. Fdration tudiante universitaire du Qubec - 2011

34

15. Universit du Qubec en Outaouais


15.1. tudiants au baccalaurat et aux cycles suprieurs
Liste des frais Facturs par session Frais gnraux quipements sportifs Facturs par crdit Services aux tudiants Frais technologiques Droits dauteur Total FIO 15 crdits Variation ($) Variation (%) 40,00 $ 27,00 $ 40,00 $ 27,00 $ 40,00 $ 27,00 $ 40,00 $ 27,00 $ 40,00 $ 27,00 $ 40,00 $ 27,00 $ 40,00 $ 27,00 $ 40,00 $ 27,00 $ 40,00 $ 27,00 $ 40,00 $ 30,00 $ 40,00 $ 30,00 $ 40,00 $ 30,00 $ 2007-2008 t Hiv. Aut. t 2008-2009 Hiv. Aut. t 2009-2010 Hiv. Aut. t 2010-2011 Hiv. Aut.

4,31 $ 4,00 $ 0,64 $

4,31 $ 4,00 $ 0,64 $

4,31 $ 4,00 $ 0,68 $

4,31 $ 4,00 $ 0,73 $

4,31 $ 4,00 $ 0,73 $

4,31 $ 4,00 $ 0,73 $

4,31 $ 4,00 $ 0,78 $

4,31 $ 4,00 $ 0,78 $

4,31 $ 4,00 $ 0,78 $

4,31 $ 4,25 $ 0,85 $

4,31 $ 4,25 $ 0,85 $

4,31 $ 4,25 $ 0,85 $

201,25 $

201,25 $

201,85 $

202,60 $ 1,35 $ 0,67%

202,60 $ 1,35 $ 0,67%

202,60 $ 0,75 $ 0,37%

203,35 $ 0,75 $ 0,37%

203,35 $ 0,75 $ 0,37%

203,35 $ 0,75 $ 0,37%

211,15 $ 7,80 $ 3,84%

211,15 $ 7,80 $ 3,84%

211,15 $ 7,80 $ 3,84%

15.2. tudiants au statut de rdaction


Liste des frais Facturs par session Frais de rdaction 2007-2008 t Hiv. Aut. t 2008-2009 Hiv. Aut. t 2009-2010 Hiv. Aut. t 2010-2011 Hiv. Aut.

70,00 $

70,00 $

70,00 $

70,00 $

70,00 $

70,00 $

70,00 $

70,00 $

70,00 $

70,00 $

70,00 $

70,00 $

Erreur ! Source du renvoi introuvable. Fdration tudiante universitaire du Qubec - 2011

35

Frais d'inscription Total FIO 15 crdits Variation ($) Variation (%)

40,00 $

40,00 $

40,00 $

40,00 $

40,00 $

40,00 $

40,00 $

40,00 $

40,00 $

40,00 $

40,00 $

40,00 $

110,00 $

110,00 $

110,00 $

110,00 $ -$ 0,00%

110,00 $ -$ 0,00%

110,00 $ -$ 0,00%

110,00 $ -$ 0,00%

110,00 $ -$ 0,00%

110,00 $ -$ 0,00%

110,00 $ -$ 0,00%

110,00 $ -$ 0,00%

110,00 $ -$ 0,00%

15.3. Sources

UQO. Rglement relatifs aux droits de scolarit et autres frais. [http://www.uqo.ca/direction-services/secretariatgeneral/politiques-reglements/documents/reglementfraisetudiantsoctobre2007.pdf, consult le 17 juin 2009] UQO. Simulation de frais de scolarit. [http://services.uqo.ca/SimulationFraisEnLigne/, consult le 17 juin 2009] UQO. Simulation de frais de scolarit. [http://services.uqo.ca/SimulationFraisEnLigne/, consult le 22 janvier 2011] Informations transmises directement par le service des finances de lUQO : frais autres que les droits de scolarit, annes 2006-07 2009-10.

16. Universit du Qubec Trois-Rivires


16.1. tudiants au baccalaurat
Liste des frais Facturs par session SAE - Vie tudiante SAE - Sports Frais gnraux Assurance accident 2007-2008 t Hiv. Aut. t 2008-2009 Hiv. Aut. t 2009-2010 Hiv. Aut. t 2010-2011 Hiv. Aut.

30,00 $ 30,00 $ 20,00 $ 2,10 $

30,00 $ 30,00 $ 40,00 $ 2,10 $

30,00 $ 30,00 $ 40,00 $ 2,10 $

30,00 $ 30,00 $ 40,00 $ 2,10 $

30,00 $ 30,00 $ 40,64 $ 2,10 $

30,00 $ 30,00 $ 40,64 $ 2,10 $

30,00 $ 30,00 $ 40,64 $ 0,22 $

30,00 $ 30,00 $ 41,49 $ 0,22 $

30,00 $ 30,00 $ 41,49 $ 0,22 $

30,00 $ 30,00 $ 41,49 $ 0,22 $

30,00 $ 30,00 $ 41,61 $ 0,22 $

30,00 $ 30,00 $ 41,61 $ 0,22 $

Erreur ! Source du renvoi introuvable. Fdration tudiante universitaire du Qubec - 2011

36

Facturs par crdit Copibec Frais technologiques 0,73 $ -$ 0,73 $ 4,00 $ 0,73 $ 4,00 $ 0,73 $ 4,00 $ 0,97 $ 4,06 $ 0,97 $ 4,06 $ 0,97 $ 4,06 $ 1,03 $ 4,15 $ 1,03 $ 4,15 $ 1,03 $ 4,06 $ 1,06 $ 4,15 $ 1,06 $ 4,15 $

Total FIO 15 crdits Variation ($) Variation (%)

93,05 $

173,05 $

173,05 $

173,05 $ 80,00 $ 85,98%

178,19 $ 5,14 $ 2,97%

178,19 $ 5,14 $ 2,97%

176,31 $ 3,26 $ 1,88%

179,41 $ 1,22 $ 0,68%

179,41 $ 1,22 $ 0,68%

178,06 $ 1,75 $ 0,99%

179,98 $ 0,57 $ 0,32%

179,98 $ 0,57 $ 0,32%

16.2. tudiants aux cycles suprieurs


Liste des frais Facturs par session SAE - Vie tudiante SAE - Sports Frais gnraux Assurance accident Facturs par crdit Copibec Frais technologiques 0,73 $ -$ 0,73 $ 4,00 $ 0,73 $ 4,00 $ 0,73 $ 4,00 $ 0,97 $ 4,06 $ 0,97 $ 4,06 $ 0,97 $ 4,06 $ 1,03 $ 4,15 $ 1,03 $ 4,15 $ 1,03 $ 4,15 $ 1,06 $ 4,16 $ 1,06 $ 4,16 $ 2007-2008 t Hiv. Aut. t 2008-2009 Hiv. Aut. t 2009-2010 Hiv. Aut. t 2010-2011 Hiv. Aut.

30,00 $ 30,00 $ 20,00 $ 2,10 $

30,00 $ 30,00 $ 40,00 $ 2,10 $

30,00 $ 30,00 $ 40,00 $ 2,10 $

30,00 $ 30,00 $ 40,00 $ 2,10 $

30,00 $ 30,00 $ 40,64 $ 2,10 $

30,00 $ 30,00 $ 40,64 $ 2,10 $

30,00 $ 30,00 $ 40,64 $ -$

30,00 $ 30,00 $ 41,49 $ -$

30,00 $ 30,00 $ 41,49 $ -$

30,00 $ 30,00 $ 41,49 $ -$

30,00 $ 30,00 $ 41,61 $ -$

30,00 $ 30,00 $ 41,61 $ -$

Total FIO 15

93,05 $

173,05 $

173,05 $

173,05 $

178,19 $

178,19 $

176,09 $

179,19 $

179,19 $

179,19 $

179,91 $

179,91 $

Erreur ! Source du renvoi introuvable. Fdration tudiante universitaire du Qubec - 2011

37

crdits Variation ($) Variation (%) 80,00 $ 85,98% 5,14 $ 2,97% 5,14 $ 2,97% 3,04 $ 1,76% 1,00 $ 0,56% 1,00 $ 0,56% 3,10 $ 1,76% 0,72 $ 0,40% 0,72 $ 0,40%

16.3. tudiants au statut de rdaction


Liste des frais Facturs par session Frais de rdaction SAE - Vie tudiante SAE Sports Frais gnraux Assurance accident Total FIO 15 crdits Variation ($) Variation (%) 2007-2008 t Hiv. Aut. t 2008-2009 Hiv. Aut. t 2009-2010 Hiv. Aut. t 2010-2011 Hiv. Aut.

70,00 $ 17,50 $ 17,50 $ 20,00 $ 2,10 $

70,00 $ 17,50 $ 17,50 $ 40,00 $ 2,10 $

70,00 $ 17,50 $ 17,50 $ 40,00 $ 2,10 $

70,00 $ 17,50 $ 17,50 $ 40,00 $ 2,10 $

70,00 $ 17,50 $ 17,50 $ 40,64 $ 2,10 $

70,00 $ 17,50 $ 17,50 $ 40,64 $ 2,10 $

70,00 $ 17,50 $ 17,50 $ 40,64 $ -$

70,00 $ 17,50 $ 17,50 $ 41,49 $ -$

70,00 $ 17,50 $ 17,50 $ 41,49 $ -$

70,00 $ 17,50 $ 17,50 $ 41,49 $ -$

70,00 $ 17,50 $ 17,50 $ 41,61 $ -$

70,00 $ 17,50 $ 17,50 $ 41,61 $ -$

127,10 $

147,10 $

147,10 $

147,10 $ 20,00 $ 15,74%

147,74 $ 0,64 $ 0,44%

147,74 $ 0,64 $ 0,44%

145,64 $ (1,46 $) -0,99%

146,49 $ (1,25 $) -0,85%

146,49 $ (1,25 $) -0,85%

146,49 $ 0,85 $ 0,58%

146,61 $ 0,12 $ 0,08%

146,61 $ 0,12 $ 0,08%

16.4. Sources

AGEUQTR. (2007). Mmoire sur les frais affrents. Trois-Rivires : Association gnrale des tudiants de lUniversit du Qubec Trois-Rivires. UQTR. Calcul sommaire du cot dun trimestre. [https://oraprdnt.uqtr.uquebec.ca/pls/public/finw006, consult le 17 juin 2009] UQTR. Calcul sommaire du cot dun trimestre. [https://oraprdnt.uqtr.uquebec.ca/pls/public/finw006, consult le 22 janvier 2011]
Erreur ! Source du renvoi introuvable. Fdration tudiante universitaire du Qubec - 2011 38

17. Universit de Sherbrooke


17.1. tudiants au baccalaurat
Liste des frais Facturs par session Frais d'inscription Transport en commun Facturs par crdit Services la vie tudiante Service du sport et de lA.P. Droits d'auteur Services administratifs Total FIO 15 crdits Variation ($) Variation (%) 2007-2008 t Hiv. Aut. t 2008-2009 Hiv. Aut. t 2009-2010 Hiv. Aut. t 2010-2011 Hiv. Aut.

30,00 $ -$

30,00 $ -$

30,00 $ -$

30,00 $ -$

30,00 $ -$

30,00 $ -$

30,00 $ -$

30,00 $ -$

30,00 $ -$

30,00 $ 15,00 $

30,00 $ 27,00 $

30,00 $ 27,39 $

5,15 $ 2,69 $ 0,69 $ 2,70 $

5,15 $ 2,69 $ 0,69 $ 2,70 $

5,15 $ 2,69 $ 0,69 $ 2,70 $

5,25 $ 2,74 $ 0,74 $ 2,75 $

5,25 $ 2,74 $ 0,74 $ 2,75 $

5,25 $ 2,74 $ 0,74 $ 2,75 $

5,36 $ 2,79 $ 0,79 $ 2,81 $

5,36 $ 2,79 $ 0,79 $ 2,81 $

5,36 $ 2,79 $ 0,79 $ 2,81 $

5,47 $ 2,85 $ 0,82 $ 2,87 $

5,47 $ 2,85 $ 0,82 $ 2,87 $

5,47 $ 2,85 $ 0,82 $ 2,87 $

198,45 $

198,45 $

198,45 $

202,20 $ 3,75 $ 1,89%

202,20 $ 3,75 $ 1,89%

202,20 $ 3,75 $ 1,89%

206,25 $ 4,05 $ 2,00%

206,25 $ 4,05 $ 2,00%

206,25 $ 4,05 $ 2,00%

225,15 $ 18,90 $ 9,16%

237,15 $ 30,90 $ 14,98%

237,54 $ 31,29 $ 15,17%

17.2. tudiants aux cycles suprieurs


Liste des frais Facturs par session 2007-2008 t Hiv. Aut. t 2008-2009 Hiv. Aut. t 2009-2010 Hiv. Aut. t 2010-2011 Hiv. Aut.

Erreur ! Source du renvoi introuvable. Fdration tudiante universitaire du Qubec - 2011

39

Frais d'inscription Transport en commun Facturs par crdit Services la vie tudiante Service du sport et de lA.P. Droits d'auteur Services administratifs Total FIO 15 crdits Variation ($) Variation (%)

30,00 $ -$

30,00 $ -$

30,00 $ -$

30,00 $ -$

30,00 $ -$

30,00 $ -$

30,00 $ -$

30,00 $ -$

30,00 $ -$

30,00 $ 15,00 $

30,00 $ 27,00 $

30,00 $ 27,39 $

5,15 $ 2,69 $ 0,69 $ 2,70 $ 198,45 $

5,15 $ 2,69 $ 0,69 $ 2,70 $ 198,45 $

5,15 $ 2,69 $ 0,69 $ 2,70 $ 198,45 $

5,25 $ 2,74 $ 0,74 $ 2,75 $ 202,20 $ 3,75 $ 1,89%

5,25 $ 2,74 $ 0,74 $ 2,75 $ 202,20 $ 3,75 $ 1,89%

5,25 $ 2,74 $ 0,74 $ 2,75 $ 202,20 $ 3,75 $ 1,89%

5,36 $ 2,79 $ 0,79 $ 2,81 $ 206,25 $ 4,05 $ 2,00%

5,36 $ 2,79 $ 0,79 $ 2,81 $ 206,25 $ 4,05 $ 2,00%

5,36 $ 2,79 $ 0,79 $ 2,81 $ 206,25 $ 4,05 $ 2,00%

5,47 $ 2,85 $ 0,82 $ 2,81 $ 224,25 $ 18,00 $ 8,73%

5,47 $ 2,85 $ 0,82 $ 2,81 $ 236,25 $ 30,00 $ 14,55%

5,47 $ 2,85 $ 0,82 $ 2,81 $ 236,64 $ 30,39 $ 14,73%

17.3. tudiants au statut de rdaction


Liste des frais Facturs par session Frais de rdaction Services la vie tudiante Services la vie tudiante Total FIO 15 crdits Variation ($) Variation (%) 2007-2008 t Hiv. Aut. t 2008-2009 Hiv. Aut. t 2009-2010 Hiv. Aut. t 2010-2011 Hiv. Aut.

305,00 $ 23,93 $ -$ 328,93 $

305,00 $ 23,93 $ -$ 328,93 $

305,00 $ 23,93 $ -$ 328,93 $

305,00 $ 24,41 $ -$ 329,41 $ 0,48 $ 0,15%

305,00 $ 24,41 $ -$ 329,41 $ 0,48 $ 0,15%

305,00 $ 24,41 $ -$ 329,41 $ 0,48 $ 0,15%

305,00 $ 24,90 $ -$ 329,90 $ 0,49 $ 0,15%

305,00 $ 24,90 $ -$ 329,90 $ 0,49 $ 0,15%

305,00 $ 24,90 $ -$ 329,90 $ 0,49 $ 0,15%

305,00 $ -$ 15,00 $ 320,00 $ (9,90 $) -3,00%

305,00 $ -$ 27,00 $ 332,00 $ 2,10 $ 0,64%

305,00 $ -$ 27,39 $ 332,39 $ 2,49 $ 0,75%

Erreur ! Source du renvoi introuvable. Fdration tudiante universitaire du Qubec - 2011

40

17.4. tudiant inscrit un stage coopratif


Liste des frais Facturs par session Frais d'inscription Transport en commun Facturs par crdit Services la vie tudiante Service du sport et de lA.P. Droits d'auteur Services administratifs Total FIO 15 crdits Variation ($) Variation (%) 2007-2008 t Hiv. Aut. t 2008-2009 Hiv. Aut. t 2009-2010 Hiv. Aut. t 2010-2011 Hiv. Aut.

-$ -$

-$ -$

-$ -$

-$ -$

-$ -$

-$ -$

-$ -$

-$ -$

-$ -$

315,00 $ 15,00 $

315,00 $ 27,39 $

315,00 $ 27,39 $

5,15 $ 2,69 $ 0,69 $ 2,70 $

5,15 $ 2,69 $ 0,69 $ 2,70 $

5,15 $ 2,69 $ 0,69 $ 2,70 $

5,25 $ 2,74 $ 0,74 $ 2,75 $

5,25 $ 2,74 $ 0,74 $ 2,75 $

5,25 $ 2,74 $ 0,74 $ 2,75 $

5,36 $ 2,79 $ 0,79 $ 2,81 $

5,36 $ 2,79 $ 0,79 $ 2,81 $

5,36 $ 2,79 $ 0,79 $ 2,81 $

5,47 $ 0,00 $ 0,00 $ 0,00 $

5,47 $ 0,00 $ 0,00 $ 0,00 $

5,47 $ 0,00 $ 0,00 $ 0,00 $

198,45 $

198,45 $

198,45 $

202,20 $ 3,75 $ 1,89%

202,20 $ 3,75 $ 1,89%

202,20 $ 3,75 $ 1,89%

206,25 $ 4,05 $ 2,00%

206,25 $ 4,05 $ 2,00%

206,25 $ 4,05 $ 2,00%

412,05 $ 205,80 $ 99,78%

424,44 $ 218,19 $ 105,79%

424,44 $ 218,19 $ 105,79%

17.5. Sources

Universit de Sherbrooke. Admission : cot des tudes. [http://www.usherbrooke.ca/admission/cout-des-etudes/, consult le 18 juin 2009] Universit de Sherbrooke. Bureau de la registraire Annuaires. [http://www.usherbrooke.ca/programmes/annuaire/, consult le 18 juin 2009] Universit de Sherbrooke. Admission : cot des tudes. [http://www.usherbrooke.ca/admission/cout-des-etudes/ etudiantes-et-etudiants-quebecois/, consult le 22 janvier 2011]
Erreur ! Source du renvoi introuvable. Fdration tudiante universitaire du Qubec - 2011 41

Annexe II - Lettre du MELS

Erreur ! Source du renvoi introuvable. Fdration tudiante universitaire du Qubec - 2011

42

You might also like