Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1.1 Definitions
Soil:
• uncemented or weakly cemented accumulation of mineral and organic particles and
sediments found above the bedrock, or
• any unconsolidated material consisting of discrete solid particles with fluid or gas in
the voids
Rock:
• indurated (consolidated by pressure or cementation ) material requiring drilling,
blasting, brute force excavation
The dividing line between soil and rock is arbitrary; the same material may sometimes be either
classified as “very soft rock” or “very hard soil”, depending on who classifies the material or
what the application is. To a geologist “our” soil is drift or unconsolidated material.
Whereas we are concerned with soil to the depth of bedrock, soil scientists (pedology) and
agricultural scientists (agronomists) are concerned with only the very uppermost layers of soil.
Soil Mechanics: (ASTM) the application of the laws and principles of mechanics and hydraulics
to engineering problems dealing with soil as an engineering material.
Geotechnical Engineering: the application of civil engineering technology to some aspect of the
earth, therefore including soil and rock as engineering materials. It combines the basic physical
sciences, geology, pedology with hydraulic, structural, transportation, construction,
environmental and mining engineering.
Most solid particles are mineral fragments that originated from the disintegration of rocks by
physical or chemical action, often referred to as weathering.
Physical Weathering: erosion due to freezing & thawing, abrasion from glaciers, temperature
changes, and the activity of plants and animals.
Naturally occurring soils are usually a mixture of two or more of the above components.
(e.g., silty-sand, clayey-silt, clay with gravel)
In addition, the void space between the slid particles may be filled with either pore fluid gas.
• highly variable
- properties vary widely from point to point within the soil mass
- more heterogeneous rather than homogeneous
- large variations over small distances
• anisotropic
- different properties in different directions
- primarily a result of depositional and loading history
The behavior of soil in situ is often governed by soil fabric, weak layers and zones, and other
defects in the material. It is therefore essential that the successful geotechnical engineer
develops a feel for the soil behavior.
Generally we idealize the behavior using applied mechanics concepts, and then apply
engineering judgement (based on our own experience and the experience of others) to come up
with a final solution.
2) Pore fluid
- normally water
- could be oil, bitumen
- could be leachate
3) Pore gas
- normally air
- could be methane (landfill, pipeline)
- often excess CO2 in tropics, radon
For quantifying the properties of a soil, a series of definitions and terminology has developed to
describe the three phase system – best illustrated with the use of a phase diagram.
VA MA=0
Air
VV
VW Water MW
VT
Solid MT
VS MS
• provides an easy means to identify both what is know and the relationship between known
and desired quantities
• we usually measure the total volume VT, the mass of water MW, and the mass of solids MS
• we may then calculate the rest of the values and the mass volume relationships that we need.
Most relationships are independent of sample size and are often dimensionless.
Void Ratio, e:
VV
e=
VS
[1]
VV = volume of voids
VS = volume of solids
• Expressed as a decimal
• Typically:
Sands 0.4 < e < 1.0 very loose sand e ≈ 0.8
Clays 0.3 < e < 1.5 soft clay e > 1
organic clays e > 3
• Empirically determined that much of soil behavior is related to e
As e decreases density increases
As e decreases strength increases
As e decreases permeability decreases
Porosity, n:
VV
n=
VT
[2]
VV = volume of voids
VT = volume total
VW
S= × 100 (%)
VV
[3]
VW = volume of water
VV = volume of voids
• Expressed as a percentage
• Tells us the percentage of the total volume of voids that contain water
• Range is from 0 to 100%
S = 0 % soil is completely dry
S = 100 % soil is saturated (i.e. pore spaces are completely filled with water)
Density, ρ :
• Expressed as g/cm3, kg/m3 or Mg/m3 (=g/cm3)
Density of Solids, ρ S:
MS = mass of solids
VS = volume of solids
MS
ρS =
VS
[4]
Density of Water, ρ W:
MW
ρW = = 1.0g / cm 3 = 1.0Mg / m 3 at 4 o C
VW
[5]
MW = mass of water
VW = volume of water
S = 100%, therefore VA = 0
MT
ρ sat =
VT
[7]
Similar to bulk density except that the sample must have S = 100%
e.g. saturated soil below the water table
Dry Density, ρ d:
S = 0%, therefore MW = 0
MS
ρd =
VT
[8]
The relationships just defined in terms of masses (or densities) can be expressed in terms of
weights and are called unit weights.
Unit Weight, γ :
γ = ρ× g
[10]
g = acceleration due to gravity = 9.81 m/s2
Moisture Content, w:
ASTM D2216
MW
w= × 100(%)
MS
[11]
• Expressed as a percentage
• The amount of water present in a soil relative to the mass of dry soil.
• See Bowles Experiment #1, pages 15-17.
γS ρ
Gs = = S
γW ρW
[12]
• Note that the Canadian Foundation and Engineering Manual (1992) terms this ratio as the
relative density of the solid phase with respect to water and uses the symbol Dr.
• See Bowles Experiment #7, pages 71-78
• Defined as the weight of soil divided by the weight of an equal volume of water at 20oC
• Gs is found using a sample of soil and a pycnometer, which gives the average specific
gravity of the materials from which the soil particles are made.
• Typically 2.6 to 2.8 for the solid minerals in soil
• Often Gs < 1 for organic particles
e S = w Gs
[13]
G + eS
ρ= S ρw
1+ e
[14]
set S = 1 for ρsat
set S = 0 for ρd
TABLE 1. Summary of typical values of porosity, void ratio, water content, saturated density
and saturated unit weight.
A saturated soil sample (S = 100%) has a water content of 42% and a specific gravity of 2.70.
Calculate the void ratio, porosity, bulk unit weight, and bulk density.
A cylinder of soil has a volume of 1.15×10-3 m3, a mass of 2.290 kg and Gs of 2.68. The mass of
solid obtained by drying is 2.035 kg. Calculate: ρ, γ, wn, e, n, and S.
• convenient dividing line is the smallest grain that is visible to the naked eye
• with the Unified Soil Classification System (USCS) the division corresponds to a
particle size of 0.075 mm.
Particles larger than this size are called coarse-grained, while soils finer than this size are
called fine-grained.
Soil Type
Gravels, Sands Silts Clays
We are interested in both the particle size and the distribution of the particle sizes.
Sieve tests and hydrometer tests are used to define the distribution of grain sizes.
The range of particle sizes varies from 200 mm > D > 0.002 mm (i.e. by orders of
magnitude) hence when we examine the particle size distribution we plot on a logarithmic
scale.
The Unified Soil Classification System (USCS) is one commonly used classification
system.
In describing the size of a soil particle, we can use either a dimension or a name that has
been arbitrarily assigned to a certain size range. Classification from the USCS is
described below:
Since soil particles are rarely perfect spheres, particle diameter (or size) refers to an
equivalent particle diameter as found from the sieve analysis. We will use the U.S.
Standard Sieves. The sieve sizes are summarized in Table 3.2.
Table 3.2 U.S. Standard Sieve Sizes and their Corresponding Opening Dimension
Sand Gravel
Fines (Silt, Clay) Boulders
F M C F C
Nested sieves are used for soils with grain sizes larger than 75 :m. For finer soils (silts
and clays) the hydrometer test is used.
D60
Cu =
D10
where: D60 = grain diameter (in mm) corresponding to 60% passing by mass and,
D10 = grain diameter (in mm) corresponding to 10% passing by mass.
(Note: if D60 = D10, Cu = 1, all particles between 10% and 60% are the same size).
where: D30 = grain diameter (in mm) corresponding to 30% passing by mass.
1 < CC < 3
If CU and CC do not meet both of the criteria above, the soil is poorly graded.
Well graded: good representation of particle sizes over a wide range; gradation curve is
generally smooth.
Poorly graded: either excess or a deficiency of certain sizes, or most of the particles
about the same size. (i.e. uniform soil)
Gap graded: a proportion of grain sizes within a specific range is low (it is also poorly
graded).
ID 0 15 35 65 85 100
Very Loose Compact Dense Very
Loose Dense
N 28o 30o 36o 45o
Frost heaving occurs if water may be drawn towards the freezing front in soils from
below, forming lenses of ice. Whether or not water may be drawn to the freezing front is
largely governed by the pore size, which is a function of the grain size distribution of the
Silts combine sufficiently high suction and permeability to maximize ice lens production,
hence road base material, for example, is usually specified to have not more than 3% silt
size particles to alleviate frost heave beneath roads.
• Used to specify material for concrete aggregate (sand & gravel), road base material
• Used to examine and develop borrow pits.
4. Geotechnical Processes
Piping ratio:
D15( FILTER )
< 4to5
D85( SOIL)
Prevents the protected soil from moving through the filter.
D15( FILTER )
> 4to5
D15( SOIL)
Ensures that the filter is large enough to improve the situation.
It may be necessary to place a number of filter materials in series to avoid piping.
“Clay” refers to both a specific sheet size ( < 2 µm) and specific minerals (sheet silicates) that are
somewhat similar to mica. The cohesive properties of natural soils are normally related to the
presence of clay minerals (e.g., kaolinite, illite, monmorillonite, chlorite and vermiculite).
- hydrated cations (+ve) are attracted to -ve clay particles forming a double layer
The double layer (or bound water) is the main reason that the engineering behaviour of clayey
soils are strongly influenced by the presence of water.
Atterberg Limits
Since water plays an important role in the behaviour with a significant clayey fraction, a range of
water content has been defined that correlate strongly with the engineering properties of fine
grained soils. The Atterberg limits are water contents that bracket different behavioural states for
the soil.
shrinkage limit, ws
plastic limit, wP
liquid limit, wL
IP =
The Plasticity Index provides an important indication of soil properties and may indicate its
composition. It is used in the classification of fine grained soils.
IL =
NOTES:
COARSE GRAINED
( < 50% PASSES No. 200 SIEVE)
GRAVEL ( < 50% PASSES No. 4 SIEVE) G
SAND ( > 50% PASSES No. 4 SIEVE) S
FINE GRAINED
( > 50% PASSING No. 200 SIEVE)
SILT M
CLAY C
ORGANIC O
PEAT Pt
2) SUBDIVISIONS SUFFIX
COMPACTION OF SOILS
Clay Liner - low permeability (relatively impervious) for municipal and toxic solid
waste disposal
1)
2)
3)
4)
2
The relationship between the dry density (or unit weight) and water content of a soil is measured
in the laboratory with the compaction test. Here a soil sample mixed to a certain water content is
compacted in a cylinder of known volume. The dry density of the soil can be computed by
measuring both the total mass of the soil and the water content.
γd
19 .
.
.
18 .
17
6 8 10 12 14 16 18
w
Typical Compaction Curve for Silty Clay
Explanation of shape:
Relationship between dry density, water content and degree of saturation can be calculated viz,
Note that:
- no data points should lie to the right of the zero air void curve
Modified Proctor test has a greater compactive effort (CE) than the Standard Proctor.
• as CE 8,
• as w 8
•
5
σ
600
Strength (kPa)
400
200
w ε%
γd
w
6
• hydraulic conductivity
decreases as moulding water
content
• huge decrease in k
• minimum k occurs 2 to 4%
above the optimum water
content
flocculated
dispersed
7
Compacted clay liners are commonly used as barriers in waste containment facilities (e.g.,
municipal solid waste landfills) to minimize the movement of contaminants from the facility.
SOLID WASTE
! since lowest values of k achieved with kneading compaction, make great effort in the field
to repetitively knead the soil with many passes of pad-foot, club-foot or wedge-foot rollers
! also compact in lifts with pad-foot compactor with feet long enough to penetrate through the
lift being compacted into the underlying lift
! minimum thickness (normally) of 0.9 m (six lifts of 0.15 m) to minimize the risk of defects in a
layer having a significant impact on performance
- probability of cracks lining up is very small if compacted in more than four layers
Having defined the necessary dry density for the soil, determined the type of compactor and
determined the lift height, it is subsequently necessary to monitor the density of the field
compacted soil to ensure that the soil is performing as expected and that contractor is performing
the work as required.
The easiest and probably most common method of determining the soil density is with the use of a
Nuclear Density Meter. Other methods include sand cone and rubber balloon tests.
TYPES OF PROBLEMS
NATURE OF FLOW
flow from A to B
- not in a straight line
- not at a constant velocity
- rather winding path from pore to pore
• some geologic materials (e.g., many crystalline rocks) have a high total porosity - most of
which are interconnected
- effective porosity ne - percentage of interconnected pore space
- contaminants may move very fast in fractured rock
ONE DIMENSIONAL FLOW - DARCY’S LAW
Classical experiment performed by H. Darcy in the 1850's to study the flow properties of water
through a sand filter bed.
Q=
where:
h3 = height above datum of water rise in standpipe inserted at the top of the sand [ L ]
h4 = height above datum of water rise in standpipe inserted at the base of the sand [ L ]
L = length of sample [ L ]
iab =
Q=
Consider the flow between points 1 - 2 and 3 - 4. Continuity of flow requires that:
Q 1-2 = Q 3-4
h = hv + hp + z
hp = pressure head
- height to which liquid rises in a piezometer above that point
- pore pressure u = hp × ãw
z = elevation head
- vertical distance from datum to point
h = total head [ L ]
Note: Total head is always measured relative to some datum. Since flow depends on the gradient
(or change in head over a given distance) the choice of the position of datum is not important -
however, choosing a datum (and clearly defining it) is of paramount importance.
Example 1.
Example 2.
Example 3.
PHYSICAL INTERPRETATION OF DARCY’S PROPORTIONALITY CONSTANT
k % ãw
k % 1/µ
k % d2
where:
µ = viscosity
k = ki ãw
µ
Both the unit weight and the viscosity of water can change with temperature. For practical
purposes of groundwater flow these changes are small; we ignore these effects (unless the
temperatures approach 0°C), so we treat k as a soil property, independent of other effects.
HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY
- effective porosity
- grain size and grain size distribution
- shape and orientation of particles
- degree of saturation
- clay mineralogy
k (m/s)
102 -
101 -
1-
10-1 -
10-2 -
10-3 -
10-4 -
10-5 -
10-6 -
10-7 -
10-8 -
10-9 -
10-10 -
HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY AND CLAY MINERALOGY
In general, the higher the specific surface and cation exchange capacity, the greater amount of
bound water and the lower the hydraulic conductivity value.
illite
30 .08 - 25 10-9 - 10-11
montmorillonite
3 100 - 100 10-10 - 10-15
kaolinite
- would have to be very pure to obtain low k because of low CEC
- valuable as a pottery clay
illite
- probably best barrier clays
- fairly inactive, no interlayer expansion or contraction
- yield low k barrier if constitute about 20% of well graded soil
montmorillonite
- obtain the lowest hydraulic conductivity
- susceptible to interlayer expansion and contraction - may get huge increase in k - BAD
- most temperamental of the clay minerals
LABORATORY MEASUREMENT OF HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY
The engineered barrier systems in modern municipal solid waste landfills provide excellent
examples of the use of one dimensional flow problems to solve seepage problems.
TWO DIMENSIONAL STEADY STATE SEEPAGE
Several assumptions are required to derive the equation governing two dimensional steady state
seepage.
Consider the flow of water into an element with dimensions dx and dy and unit width in the z
direction.
Numerical solutions may be highly dependent upon the refinement of the finite-difference grid or
finite-element mesh. For transient analysis suitable refinement of the time step is also important.
Such numerical methods should be considered incorrect until proven correct.
1) Equipotential lines
- EP
- lines of constant total head
2) Flow lines
- FL
- lines parallel to the direction of flow
If we draw a flow net with constant head difference between EPs for flow through a
homogeneous, isotropic porous medium then:
- EP z FL
- get curvilinear squares - don’t have to all be the same size
- be able to fit circle tangent to all sides
7
Flow net for
Darcy’s Apparatus 6
0
To solve for the flow Q use Darcy’s law:
- calculate Q based on one square then multiply by the number of flow tubes
ÄQ = k Äh a
L
Any deformation or mobilization of shearing resistance of a soil is associated with the soil
skeleton since:
- water is incompressible
- water cannot support shear stresses
óN = ó - u
ó = óN + u 1 - Ac
A
• the compressibility of the soil particles is small and the strength of individual particles is large
Effective stress can be thought of as the force carried by the soil skeleton divided by the total area
of the soil element (including the area of pore water).
-1-
CALCULATING EFFECTIVE STRESSES
• the total vertical stress σv within a particular soil layer is equal to the total weight per unit area
of material above that point
-2-
Example 1
-3-
Example 2. Typical River Crossing with Artesian Conditions
-4-
CAPILLARY AND SOIL SUCTION
The concept of soil suction is fundamental when considering the mechanical behaviour of
ø = ( ua - u ) + ð
Matric suction is associated with the capillary phenomenon arising from the surface tension of
water.
• the capillary phenomenon is best illustrated by considering the rise of a water surface in a
capillary tube
Consider a small glass tube inserted into water under atmospheric conditions:
-1-
• water rises up a small tube resulting from a combination of the surface tension of a liquid and
the tendency of some liquids ro wet surfaces which they come into contact with
2 ð r Ts cos á = ð r2 hc ñw g
solve for hc
Rs = radius of curvature ( r ÷ α)
The radius of the tube is analogous to the pore radius in the soil. The smaller the pore radius, the
greater the capillary rise.
• common to assume the effective pore size is 20% of effective grain size D10
Note that highly variable pore size and pore distribution complicate the capillary phenomenon in
soils. However, useful qualitative deductions can be made from the glass tube analogy.
hc (m)
Loose Dense
Coarse sand 0.03 - 0.12 0.04 - 0.15
Fine sand 0.3 - 2.0 0.4 - 3.5
Silt 1.5 - 10 2.5 - 12
Clay > 10
-2-
Consider several points in the capillary system that are in hydrostatic equilibrium
• for a soil with a capillary zone, this results in an increased compression on the soil skeleton
Contact Moisture
VADOSE ZONE
Partially Saturated by
Capillarity
Saturated by
Capillarity
PHREATIC ZONE
Ground Water
-3-
STRESSES IN AN ELASTIC MASS
3P z3
Vertical Stress σz =
2πR3
P 3 r 2 z (1 − 2 v ) R
Radial Stress σr = − −
2πR 2 R3 R+z
P (1 − 2 v ) R z
Tangential stress σθ = −
2πR 2 R + z R
3P r z2
Shear stress τ rz =
2πR5
1
(b) Uniformly Loaded Strip
Vertical stress σz =
P
[ α + sin α cos (α + 2δ ) ]
π
Horizontal stress σx =
P
[ α − sin α cos (α + 2δ ) ]
π
2p
Horizontal stress σy = να
π
sin α sin (α + 2δ )
p
Shear stress τ xz =
π
2
(c) Uniformly Load Circle
On axis, at depth z,
3
1 2
Vertical stress σz = p 1 −
1 + (a / z )2
2 (1 + ν ) z z3
Horizontal stresses σ r = σθ =
p
(1 + 2ν ) − +
2
a +z
2
( 2 2
1
) (
a 2 + z2 ) 3
2
3
Increment in vertical stress (∆σv = ∆qv) beneath a circular footing with radius R and subject to
uniform vertical pressure ∆qs on uniform, isotropic elastic half-space.
4
(d) Uniformly Loaded Rectangle
Vertical stress σz beneath the corner of a rectangle is given by Fadum’s chart. For points other
than the corner, σz may be obtained by superposition of rectangles.
5
(e) General Shapes
For linear elastic problems solutions may be added or subtracted to solve problems involving
more complex geometry.
For example:
6
SETTLEMENT OF SOILS
The design of foundations for engineering structures requires that the magnitude and rate of
settlement be known.
ST = Si + S + Ss
where:
Si = immediate or distortion settlement
Ss = secondary compression
When a soil is loaded settlement occurs because of water and air squeezing out from the voids.
This results in a decrease in void ratio, and hence settlement.
-1-
MECHANICAL ANALOGY OF CONSOLIDATION
For real soil materials, the compression of the spring is analogous to a decrease in void ratio arising
from a change in effective stresses
Consolidation is a time dependent process since it involves the flow of water from the pores.
- consolidation is the dissipation of excess pore pressure
-2-
STRAIN INTEGRATION
Recall the axial deformation δ of a column with stiffness E and cross-sectional area A, subject to
axial load P.
Likewise for a soil material subject to increases in effective stress, the settlement (vertical
displacement) may be found be integrating the vertical strain, viz:
where:
∆εz = change in vertical strain because of a change in σN
D = thickness of compressible layer
n = number of sub-layers
∆zi = thickness of sub-layers
∆εz
Layer 1 ∆z1
Layer 2 ∆z2
∆zi
...
Layer n ∆zn
The number (n) and thickness (∆zi) of sub-layers depends on the function to be integrated
-3-
For conditions of one-dimensional strain, the change in volume strain ∆εv is equal to the change in
vertical strain ∆εz.
BEFORE AFTER
− ∆e
D D
S = ∫
0
∆ ε z dz = ∫0
1 + eo
dz
Now, need to express the relationship between void ratio and effective stress to calculate S
because of change in σN.
-4-
OEDOMETER TEST
In the laboratory we can measure the change in height of a sample (and thereby calculate the
change in void ratio) for a certain effective stress. This test is called a consolidation test and is
performed in an oedometer which permits one-dimensional strain.
- apply load
- excess pore pressure will dissipate and effective stresses will increase and the soil will settle
- monitor the change in height of the sample until most of the pore pressures have dissipated
(achieve 90% consolidation)
-5-
Vertical Strain and Void Ratio Versus Effective Stress
Calculate the vertical strain or void ratio from the measurements of change in height of the
sample. Can either plot these results on a linear or logarithmic scale of effective stress.
∆ε v = mv ∆ σ ′
Note that:
- mv is not constant
- depends on stress level
- mv decreases as σN increases
i.e. soil becomes stiffer
-6-
Vertical Strain and Void Ratio Versus Logarithm of Effective Stress
- same data as previous plot now plotted versus the logarithm of effective stress
Note that:
- apparently get a straight line
- simplifies calculations
- since log scale, still represents
strain hardening behaviour
-7-
Experimental results from an oedometer test are plotted with void ratio(e) versus the log of
effective stress (σN): “ e log σN ” plot
0.8
0.7
Void Ratio e
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
1 10 100 1000 10000
Effective Stress σ' (kPa)
-8-
STRESS HISTORY OF SOILS
Soils have a “memory”, that is to say they remember the effective stresses that they have
previously experienced. Represent the stress history with the over consolidation ratio OCR,
where:
OCR =
0.8
0.7
NORMALLY CONSOLIDATED
Void Ratio e
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
1 10 100 1000 10000
0.6
0.4
0.3
1 10 100 1000 10000
-9-
Determination of σpN using Cassagrande’s graphical procedure:
1) Plot laboratory data on e vs log σN graph. This laboratory data must be corrected for errors
arising from sample disturbance to get the field curve.
5) Bisect the angle between the horizontal line and the tangent through point A.
6) The intersection of the extension of the straight line portion of the compression curve with
the bisector line is the preconsolidation stress σpN.
-10-
Prediction of field e - log σN curves with Schmertmann’s Procedure NC Soils:
-11-
Prediction of field e - log σN curves with Schmertmann’s Procedure OC Soils:
5) from ( eo , σvoN ) construct line parallel to unload - reload loop to find the void ratio
corresponding to σpN
-12-
Typical e - log σN curves:
If consolidation tests are conducted on many samples from different depths can construct profiles
like the one shown below. This is typical of a stiffer “crust” material that has been
preconsolidated. The material below 20 m is normally consolidated.
-13-
Calculation of Primary Settlement
1) Elastic Model
∆εz = mv ∆σN
a) for NC soil,
0.8
0.7
Void Ratio e
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
1 10 100 1000 10000
Effective Stress σ' (kPa)
-14-
b) for OC soil with σNf < σNp,
0.8
0.7
Void Ratio e
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
1 10 100 1000 10000
0.8
0.7
Void Ratio e
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
1 10 100 1000 10000
-15-
CONSOLIDATION
Consolidation is an important mechanism involving the flow of water through the soil leading to
time dependent settlements.
• process of consolidation involves the dissipation of excess pore pressure.
• decrease in pore pressures result in increases in effective stresses.
• increase in effective stresses lead to settlement.
z
(m) 5
10
Initial Conditions Load rapidly applied, Some time after load Long time after load
applied, applied,
-1-
MECHANICAL ANALOGUE FOR CONSOLIDATION
-2-
Governing Differential Equation for Consolidation
Assumptions:
1. soil is saturated and homogeneous
2. water and soil particles are incompressible
3. Darcy’s law is valid
4. one dimensional strain
5. k remains constant
6. change in volume results from change in void ratio and Me/MσN remains constant
7. total stress remains constant after application.
cv = k
mvγw
Time Factor, T = cv t
H2
-3-
substituting into the governing differential equation with σ constant for t > 0 gives:
The solution to this equation for a layer of thickness z with two way drainage (ie. Z = 2) with
boundary conditions:
at t = 0, ∆u = ∆uo for 0 # Z # 2
is:
∞
2 ∆ uo
∆u = ∑ ( sin MZ) e − M T
2
m=0 M
where: M = π / 2 ( 2m + 1 )
Useful to define another dimensionless parameter that represents the proportion of excess pore
that has dissipated at a particular point in the deposit, viz:
where:
The solution to the consolidation equation can be expressed graphically as shown in Figure C1.
-4-
FIGURE C1.
-5-
Example: A 4 m thick layer of clay is subject to rapid application of surface load from 5 m of fill
(γ = 20 kN/m3). Calculate the excess pore pressure and the effective stress at the mid-point of the
clay layer: (a) initially, and (b) after 4 months.
SILT SILT
CLAY CLAY
SAND SAND
Initially
σoN = σo - uo
σo =
uo =
σoN =
σ =
u =
σN =
-6-
After 4 months
- use consolidation theory to solve for excess pore pressure after 4 months
- since silt and sand are much more permeable than clay, there is two way drainage for the clay
Time Factor, T = cv t
H2
∆u = ∆uo (1 - Uz)
=
=
σ =
u =
σN =
Z = z/H
ˆ ∆u = ∆uo (1 - Uz) =
σoN =
σN =
-7-
Since
∆σAN > ∆σBN
Need some way of averaging ∆u with depth to obtain the average degree of consolidation for the
entire layer.
∫
D
∆ u t dz
U = consolidation settlement at time t = St = 1 − 0
∫
D
total final consolidation settlement S ∆ u o dz
0
- assuming:
σ constant with time,
mv constant with depth and time
Various solutions have been obtained for the average degree of consolidation. Figure C2 gives U
for three cases where there is a linear variation in stress increment with depth.
-8-
Example: Find the consolidation settlement of the 4 metre thick clay deposit 4 months after the
fill is placed.
100 kPa
Step 1: Find the total final settlement.
n
S = ∑ ∆ ε z ∆ zi
i=1
3m SILT
Use just one sublayer here.
∆e
∆ε z =
1 + eo γ = 16.3 kN/m3
wn = 70%, Gs = 2.72
4m
σoN = CLAY cv = 1.26 m2/yr
σfN =
Cc = 1.055
Since OCR =1 , NC soil. OCR = 1
σ′
∆e = − C c log10 f
σ ′o SAND
Find eo using: e S = w Gs
S =
After 4 months,
Z =
T =
U =
S t = 4 mo = U×S =
-9-
How to find the Coefficient of Consolidation cv Using Taylor’s Method
1) Plot change in height of the sample measured during consolidation test versus the square root
of time. This is done for each load increment.
2) Fit straight line through the initial part of the compression curve.
4) Draw a second line from Ro with a slope 1.15 times larger than the line from step 2.
5) The intersection of this line with the compression curve is defined as t90.
6) Calculate cv using:
T H dr 2 T90 H dr 2
cv = =
t t 90
-10-
MOHR CIRCLE IN SOIL MECHANICS
Mohr circle of stress is a graphical representation of the state of stress at a point at equilibrium.
Sign Convention:
- compressive forces and stresses are taken as positive (change in normal sign convention because
tension is rare in soil mechanics)
- positive shear stresses produce clockwise moments about a point just outside the element
-1-
The stability of an existing slope can be assessed by comparing the disturbing forces (self weight)
with the strength of the soil mobilized along a potential failure surface. Consider the stresses
acting a point along the potential failure surface below.
-2-
Now suppose we want to know the stresses for this same point but oriented in a different
direction (e.g., on a potential failure plane). It is useful to define the pole of the Mohr circle.
If a line is drawn from a point on the circle (representing a state of stress) parallel to the plane on
which the stress state exists it will intersect the circle at another point on the circle which is
known as the pole, or origin of planes.
Any line drawn through the pole will intersect the circle at a point which represents the state of
stress on a plane inclined at the same orientation in space as the line.
Once the pole is known, the stresses on any plane can be readily determined by drawing a line
through the pole parallel to the plane in question; the stress on the plane will be the coordinates
where the line intersects the circle.
1) Start from a known magnitude [ie. coordinates (σ, τ) ] and orientation of stress. Go to that
point on the Mohr circle.
2) Draw a line through the point of known stress with the same orientation in space as the plane
on which those stresses act.
-3-
τ
Principal Stresses
- σ1 and σ3 are the respective maximum and minimum normal stresses on the Mohr circle
- note that the shear stress is equal to zero along the major and minor principal planes
-4-
Example1. Given:
a) Find the normal and shear stresses acting on a plane inclined at 30o to the horizontal.
d) Find the maximum shear stress and the orientation of the plane on which it acts.
-5-
Example 2. Given:
a) Find the magnitude of the normal and shear stresses on the horizontal plane.
-6-
STRENGTH OF SOILS - MOHR-COULOMB FAILURE CRITERION
Failure or yield of a soil material occurs when the shear stresses exceed the shear strength.
Soil materials generally fail because of excess shear stresses. Uniform compressive stresses (ie. σ1
= σ3 ) alone will only tend to change the volume of the soil. Non-uniform compressive stresses
(e.g., σ1 > σ3 ) induce shear stresses in the soil.
The shear strength of soil is defined as the shear stress acting on the failure plane at failure.
where: τff = the shear stress acting on the failure plane at failure
- the shear strength of the soil
σNff = the normal effective stress acting on the failure plane at failure
-7-
Consider a triaxial compression test on a medium sand.
-cylinder of sand
-8-
SHEAR STRENGTH OF SAND
Of these factors, void ratio is the single most important factor. Generally, the lower the void ratio
(higher density) the higher the shear strength.
Dense Sand
If a sand is dense, the only way shearing can occur is for grains to move apart.
Therefore dense sands when sheared to failure exhibit an tendency for volume increase.
Loose Sand
Therefore loose sands when sheared to failure exhibit an tendency for volume decrease.
Example: A sample of loose sand is know to have a friction angle φN = 30o. It is tested in direct
shear under a normal stress of 200 kN/m2. Determine the shear strength, the maximum shear
stress and the major and minor principal stress at failure.
σ
Example: Direct shear tested were conducted on a sample of compacted sand. Determine the
peak and ultimate friction angles based on the results that were recorded.
Test 1 2 3 4
Normal force (N) 110216324432
Ultimate shear force (N) 66 131195261
Peak shear force (N) 85 170253340
100
80
Shear Stress (kPa)
60
40
20
0
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200
σ
Consider the Triaxial Test
either
∆u = 0 ∆u = Ω
∆u = 0 ∆u = ∆us ∆u = ∆us
σ1N = σοN + Ω + Ζ σ1N = σοN + Ω + Ζ − ∆us σ1N = σοN + Ζ − ∆us
σ3N = σοN + Ω σ3N = σοN + Ω − ∆us σ3N = σοN− ∆us
CD CU UU
Consolidated Drained Triaxial Test (CD Test)
- soil is allowed to consolidate to a given effective hydrostatic stress σcN with full drainage
- the soil is loaded to failure very slowly so that no excess pore pressures develop
Stress Path: locus of stress points on a given plane (normally the failure plane, but not always)
TSP - Total Stress Path ESP - Effective Stress Path
σ
Example: A consolidated drained triaxial test was conducted on a normally consolidated clay.
The results were: σ3 = 276 kN/m2
(σ1 − σ3)f = 276 kN/m2
Determine:
a) the angle of friction φN
b) the inclination of the failure plane
c) the normal σffN and shear stress τff on the failure plane at failure
d) the normal stress σnN on the plane of maximum shear stress τmax
e) explain why shear failure did not take place on the plane of maximum shear stress.
σ
Consolidated Undrained Triaxial Test (CU Test) With Pore Pressure Measurements
- soil is allowed to consolidate to a given effective hydrostatic stress σcN with full drainage
1. Control the applied (total) stresses and measure the pore pressures.
- effective stresses can be calculated
- can draw the Mohr circle for effective stresses at failure
∆us = B ( σ3 + A ( σ1 - σ3 ) )
Example: CU
Typical stress-strain and volume change versus strain curves for CD
triaxial compression tests at the same effective confining stress.
- soil is allowed to consolidate to a given effective hydrostatic stress σcN with full drainage
- the drainage system is closed off
- the soil is loaded to failure relatively quickly
- since drainage is prevented, excess pore pressures develop
- the pore pressures are measured
1. Control the applied (total) stresses and measure the pore pressures.
- effective stresses can be calculated
- can draw the Mohr circle for effective stresses at failure
Normally Consolidated
τ
σ
∆us = excess pore pressure due to shear failure
- occur because sample wants to change volume but not allowed to (since drainage is prohibited)
- because there is no volume change, the tendency towards volume change induces ∆us
- if the volume tries to decrease, water wants to squeeze out of the pores but can’t
- develop (+)ve ∆u
- NC
- effective stresses are less than the total stresses
- ESP lies to the left of the TSP
- if the volume tries to increase, wants to draw water into the pores but can’t
- develop (-)ve ∆u
- OC
- effective stresses are greater than the total stresses
- ESP lies to the right of the TSP
σ
Example: A clay soil is known to have an effective stress envelope with cN=10 kPa and φN=25E. A
series of four consolidated undrained (CU) tests were performed and the total stress Mohr circles
at failure as shown.
f) What is the shear strength of a sample with a cell pressure σ3 of 300 kPa ?
g) A clay was accidentally consolidated to σ3 = 300 kPa. The technician then reduced the
cell pressure to 200 kPa without drainage and ran an undrained test. What would the
undrained strength of this clay be ?
τ
(kPa)
300
200
100
τ
(kPa)
300
200
100
σ
τ
σ
Some examples of UU analyses for clays.
Typical stress-strain and volume change versus strain curves for CD
triaxial compression tests at the same effective confining stress.
- soil is allowed to consolidate to a given effective hydrostatic stress σcN with full drainage
- the drainage system is closed off
- the soil is loaded to failure relatively quickly
- since drainage is prevented, excess pore pressures develop
- the pore pressures are measured
1. Control the applied (total) stresses and measure the pore pressures.
- effective stresses can be calculated
- can draw the Mohr circle for effective stresses at failure
Normally Consolidated
τ
σ
∆us = excess pore pressure due to shear failure
- occur because sample wants to change volume but not allowed to (since drainage is prohibited)
- because there is no volume change, the tendency towards volume change induces ∆us
- if the volume tries to decrease, water wants to squeeze out of the pores but can’t
- develop (+)ve ∆u
- NC
- effective stresses are less than the total stresses
- ESP lies to the left of the TSP
- if the volume tries to increase, wants to draw water into the pores but can’t
- develop (-)ve ∆u
- OC
- effective stresses are greater than the total stresses
- ESP lies to the right of the TSP
σ
Example: A clay soil is known to have an effective stress envelope with cN=10 kPa and φN=25E. A
series of four consolidated undrained (CU) tests were performed and the total stress Mohr circles
at failure as shown.
f) What is the shear strength of a sample with a cell pressure σ3 of 300 kPa ?
g) A clay was accidentally consolidated to σ3 = 300 kPa. The technician then reduced the
cell pressure to 200 kPa without drainage and ran an undrained test. What would the
undrained strength of this clay be ?
τ
(kPa)
300
200
100
τ
(kPa)
300
200
100
σ
τ
σ
Some examples of UU analyses for clays.
Unconfined Compression (UC) Triaxial Test
- increase σ1 to failure
- NOTE that strength of the soil is still controlled by the effective stresses
- convenient to express strength in terms of total stresses here
FIELD MEASUREMENT OF SHEAR STRENGTH
Field Vane
Standard Penetration Test (SPT)
Cone Penetration Test (CPT)
EARTH PRESSURES AND RETAINING STRUCTURES
Introduction
The analysis of the pressures exerted by the ground against an engineering structure has been of
paramount interest dating back to the time of Coulomb in 1776. Considerations of earth
pressures are essential to the successful design of many engineering structures including bridges,
retaining walls, tunnels; therefore, it is of concern in nearly all civil engineering projects.
The subject is a vast one with a remarkable number of publications on various aspects of
earth pressure theory and its application to real engineering situations. A wide variety of
approaches have been available to solve these problems. However, because of complexities
involved in this problem, all methods involve certain simplifying assumptions and none of them
present a rigorous representation of the soil-structure interaction at failure. Many of the accepted
analyses of the past are now being challenged as a result of a more complete understanding of the
behaviour of soils when subjected to stress and strain.
A glance at many of the older handbooks of civil engineering and indeed at some modern
textbooks for structural design would lead the uninitiated to believe that earth pressure can be
calculated by simple formulas comparable to those for stress and deflection of steel or concrete
members. One would be lead to conclude that the pressure exerted by the soil was unique for
each type of soil, that the pressure was the same regardless of the type of structure or the
problem, and that the pressure could be calculated with precision to two or three significant
figures. Unfortunately none of these beliefs are correct.
Earth pressure, in the broadest sense of the word, denotes forces and stresses that occur
either in the interior of an earth mass or on the contact surface of soil and structure. Its
magnitude will be determined by the physical properties of the soil, the physical interactions
between soil and structure, value and character of absolute and relative displacements and
deformations. Knowledge of the stress-strain and strength properties of soils is fundamental to
solving these soil-structure interaction problems.
Earth pressure problems can be separated into three main classes of problems. First, the case of
an earth mass at rest where no deformations or displacements occur. This condition is strictly
fulfilled in the infinite half space at rest only. This case is mainly of theoretical interest; it gives
also the starting point for more practical problems. In the problems of the second group, the
horizontal forces in the earth masses are to be determined. Here we have retaining wall problems,
sheet piling, braced excavations, etc. Relative displacement between soil and structure occurs
causing the soil either to expand or to contract. In the first case (ie. soil expansion) we have an
active pressure, and in the second case (ie. soil contraction) a passive pressure. The most
common example for this group is the retaining wall yielding around the bottom or pressed
against the earth mass. There are also cases where at the same time compression and expansion in
-1-
different parts of the mass occur. Problems where the vertical force prevails form the third group.
These are the problems of foundations: stresses, deformations, failure of soil beneath foundation
structures. Problems of buried structures and rock pressures also belong to this group.
-2-
Fundamental Concepts
Classical earth pressure theory is reviewed and the major assumptions that are made are
discussed. A clear distinction is necessary between methods of:
σ 'h
Ko =
σ 'v
From field and lab tests for N.C. soils (Jaky 1948),
K o ≈ 1 − sin φ '
For over consolidated soils, Ko typically lies between 1 to -2.5 depending on soil type. The value
of Ko is bounded by passive failure. Ko for O.C. soils increases with over-consolidation ratio
OCR (σNp ÷ σNvo) where σNp is the past maximum vertical effective stress and σNvo is the current
vertical effective stress at a point within the ground. A relationship between Ko and the OCR has
been reported by Brooker and Ireland (1965). The CFEM (1992) suggests the use of:
For an elastic medium with Poisson’s ratio ν and zero lateral strain (ie. εx = εy = 0)
ν
Ko =
1− ν
-3-
Limiting Equilibrium (Rankine Theory)
-4-
σxN until induced shear stresses lead to failure 4
-5-
Solution for Active and Passive Pressures (Rankine 1856)
φ '
N φ ' = tan 2 45o +
2
-6-
-7-
What are the magnitudes of σxAN and σxPN ?
Active,
σxAN
Passive,
σxPN
-8-
Example 1: Estimate the earth pressure acting on the wall.
2m γ1 = 17 kN/m3
φ'1 = 34
5m
3m γ2 = 19 kN/m3
φ'2 = 36
At Point A
σv =
At Point B
σv =
At Point C
σv =
u=
σNv =
σNh =
-9-
What is the total horizontal force acting on the wall, and where does the resultant act?
-10-
Example 2: Find the factor of safety against sliding and rotational failure for the gravity retaining
wall shown.
1.5 m
5m
3m
-11-
Effect of Sloping Ground Surface
-12-
Active and Passive Earth Pressure Coefficients - Cohesive Soils
Drained Response
For cohesive soils with cN and φN
Active,
σxAN
Passive,
σxPN
Undrained Response
For cohesive soils - undrained response φN = 0, cu
Active,
σxA
ie. the net pressure for z = Hc is zero. This is the theoretical maximum height of a vertical slope
that can stand unsupported under short term conditions. The unsupported cut may only be stable
for a very short time, due to seepage forces and softening by precipitation.
-13-
SLOPE STABILITY
slope failure - the downslope movement of a soil mass occurring along a failure surface
For a uniform soil without planes of weakness, then the failure surface is close to a circle.
For a homogeneous slope with φ = 0 we have equilibrium along a circular sliding surface.
-1-
GENERAL CASE c, φ - METHOD OF SLICES
F=
- to solve this equation for the factor of safety, F, we need to know the correct normal stress
distribution.
- any method of analysis can be used for a slip circle provided that it correctly represents the overall
statics for the problem.
Procedure
-2-
2. Look at a typical slice.
t=
S=
Must determine the force N. Resolving forces perpendicular to the slip surface gives,
This implies that the resultant of the inner slice forces Xn, En acts parallel to the base of the slice. This is
considered to be a conservative assumption.
-3-
Determination of Pore Pressure u
May need to construct a flow net to determine the pressure head acting on the base of each slice.
General Notes
- method tends to give conservative solutions for uniform clays without planes of weakness
-4-
-5-
Perform Tabular Calculation
Slice No. W l α c φ u N1 N2
Σ =
N1 = W sin α
N2 = [W cos α - u l ] tan φ + c l
F = ( Σ N2 ) / ( Σ N1 )
where:
W= weight of slice [kN/m]
c = cohesion intercept [kN/m2]
φ = friction angle [degrees]
u = pore pressure = hpγw [kN/m2]
α = angle between base of slice and horizontal [degrees]
l = length of slip surface segments measured along base of slice [m]
Notes:
1) The slice weights W are calculated based on the dimensions of the slices and the unit weights of the
soils within them. W can be calculated using:
W = b Σ ( γj hj )
2) The values of c and φ for each slice correspond to the type of soil at the bottom of each slice. For
short term (ie. undrained) conditions use c = cu and φ = 0. For long term (ie. drained) conditions use c
= cN and φ = φN.
3) The value of u for each slice is the average value at the middle of the slice.
4) The base length l and the base angle α are measured on a scale drawing of the slope.
-6-
5) Normally slices are drawn so that the base of each slice is in only one type of soil. Slices need not
be of equal width.
Example 1:
Slice No. W l α c φ u N1 N2
1 119 4.35 -12 20 20 0 -25 129
Σ = 1325 867
-7-
N1 = W sin α
N2 = [W cos α - u l ] tan φ + c l
F = ( Σ N2 ) / ( Σ N1 ) = 1.53
STABILITY CHARTS
Taylor (1949) has prepared charts for the simple case of:
1) slope angle
2) angle of friction
3) c, γ, and H
-8-
φ=0 - circle passes below toe
- F depends on layer depth
-9-
Taylor’s Chart 1 Taylor’s Chart 2
-10-
Example 2. What is the short-term factor of safety for the slope considered in Example 1? Take cu =
30 kPa.
Example 3. A wide excavation was made with a slope of 1V:1H in a material with unit weight γ=18.8
kN/m3. Estimate the factor of safety for a depth of excavation of 13 m. The average undrained shear
strength along the failure surface is 50 kPa.
Example 4. For the excavation in Ex. 3, estimate the factor of safety if a strong stratum exists at a
depth of 13 m.
Example 5. Estimate the factor of safety and location of the critical failure circle when the rigid layer is
7.8 m below the toe of the slope.
Example 6. If a clay has undrained shear strength of 50 kPa and unit weight 20 kN/m3, find the
maximum depth a vertical trench can be excavated.
-11-
FIELD MONITORING OF SLOPE MOVEMENTS
-12-