You are on page 1of 3

Rubric 2

Category 4 3 2 1
Claim, Criteria & In first or second Writer offers a clear Claim, criteria, and There is no evaluative
Statement of Reasons paragraphs, writer makes evaluative claim, criteria, reasons are all present claim or claim makes no
a specific claim of and reasons. However, but do not seem linked to sense. Criteria or
evaluation, states and claim may be too broad, one another. Criteria and reasons are absent.
defends criteria, and criteria may need to be reasons are confused.
states a variety of defined more precisely, Evaluation topic is not a
reasons to support the or only a few reasons are matter of genuine
claim. Evaluation is a offered. argument.
genuine matter of
argument.
Reasons Writer explains all Writer explains reasons Writer fails to discuss There's no discussion of
reasons thoughtfully and but leaves out some some of the reasons the reasons.
in detail. Writer important detail. Writer he/she has mentioned at
anticipates and answers does not answer all of opening. Writer uses a
reader's questions. reader's questions. different set of criteria.
Grammar, Sentence Writer makes 2 or fewer Writer makes 3-4 errors Writer makes a few Writer makes several
Structure & errors in capitalization or in capitalization or errors in capitalization errors in capitalization
Punctuation punctuation, so the punctuation, but the and/or punctuation that and/or punctuation that
(Conventions) Journalistic piece is Journalistic piece is still catch the reader's catch the reader's
exceptionally easy to easy to read. attention and interrupt attention and greatly
read. the flow. interrupt the flow.
Sequencing Journalistic piece flows Journalistic piece is Journalistic piece is often Journalistic piece is so
(Organisation) smoothly from idea to usually smooth but has a jumpy. Writer uses jumbled it's hard to
idea, paragraph to few jumps. Writer often transition words understand.
paragraph, and sentence uses same transition inaccurately.
to sentence. words.
Introduction Introduction states claim Introduction states claim Introduction states the There's no clear
(Organisation) and reasons clearly, and reason clearly but is claim but no reasons. introduction or
within the first several stiffly written. Writer takes Introduction states conclusion.
paragraphs. It is more than 3 paragraphs different criteria than
interesting. Conclusion, if to get to her point. author uses. Journalistic
it restates the Journalistic Conclusion restates piece just ends or ends
piece's main points, does Journalistic piece's main on an unrelated tangent.
so in very different points accurately but in
words. If it ends with a similar words to opening.
new idea, it's relevant.
Focus or Thesis The thesis statement The thesis statement The thesis statement The thesis statement
Statement names the topic of the names the topic of the outlines some or all of does not name the topic
essay and outlines the essay. the main points to be AND does not preview
main points to be discussed but does not what will be discussed.
discussed. name the topic.
Attention Grabber The introductory The introductory The author has an The introductory
paragraph has a strong paragraph has a hook or interesting introductory paragraph is not
hook or attention grabber attention grabber, but it is paragraph but the interesting AND is not
that is appropriate for the weak, rambling or connection to the topic is relevant to the topic.
audience. This could be inappropriate for the not clear.
a strong statement, a audience.
relevant quotation,
statistic, or question
addressed to the reader.
Closing Paragraph The conclusion is strong The conclusion is The author's position is There is no conclusion -
and leaves the reader recognizable. The restated within the the Journalistic piece just
solidly understanding the author's position is closing paragraph, but ends.
writer's position. Effective restated within the first not near the beginning.
restatement of the two sentences of the
position statement begins closing paragraph.
the closing paragraph.
Persuasiveness The final product was The final product was The final product was The product was not
extremely persuasive, persuasive, giving more somewhat persuasive, persuasive at all, giving 1
giving more than 3 than 2 supporting giving 2 or less or no supporting
supporting arguments. arguments. supporting arguments. arguments.

You might also like