Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Does nature decide who we are? I start my pack-2 convinced that we are made
by culture. But China was shaped by different forces. After the first thousand
years of fighting form the northern lands of the Huang-he the Laoshan culture
was finding a wayout southward, while preventing the nord from taking part. In
771 BC the northern Quanrong Tribes from the Ordos region force the Zhou to
move their capital eastward from Shaanxi to Luoyang. This marks the decline of
centralization and the rise of regional power i.e. a large number of feudal states.
During the Shang and western Zhou, the northern tribes are agricultural. During
the eastern Zhou, the tribes practice husbandry and decorated their artifacts
with zoomorphic motifs. Those changes will be mentioned in our last chapter.
Jared Diamond advances an answer to most changes, and it was probably Geo-
graphy:
China does not have mountain ranges that transect China. In Europe big rivers flow
radially — the Rhine, the Rhone, the Danube, and the Elbe — and they don't unify
Europe. In China the two big rivers flow parallel to each other, are separated by low-lying
land, and were quickly connected by canals. For those geographic reasons, China was
unified in 221 B.C. and has stayed unified most of the time since then, whereas for
geographic reasons Europe was never unified. <1.1>
I understand that the ideas about Chineseness have changed over the years, and
are also changing elsewhere, even in Asia. The notion that identity relates to a
political entity known as the Middle Kingdom started with a name ‘Chinese’. But
clearly after reading my sources I utterly confirm what Aldous Huxley wrote in
1935 “it will be clear that 'racemixture, has in the past been beneficial”.
1.2. Identity bonds. Half truths and other white lies.
Gish Jen, a Hyphenated Asian, was questioning himself about what is to be, or
not to be, Chinese nowadays.
A few years ago in Hong Kong, for example, I had heard Chinese intellectuals question
whether anyone was really Chinese anymore. After all, they joked, the Chinese in Hong
Kong were so British, the Chinese in Taiwan so Japanese; the Chinese on the mainland so
communist. <1.2>
But if it is not politics perhaps we can assume that the Han identity is in some
sense homogeneous, as they make up to 92% of the population. But in what
sense? China's linguistic near-unity is also puzzling in comparison with the
linguistic disunity of other parts so I will spray some doubts on its genetic unity.
The very notion of minorities (minzu) is political:
Indeed the Han have a very long recorded history of their dealings with various
"barbarians", who were divided into "raw" (sheng) and "cooked" (shu) "according to
whether they were cultured enough to accept moral edification and eventual
civilization." <1.3>
The southern Han popular mythology states that their ancestors migrated by
stages to southern China because their "homeland" was occupied by "barbarian"
tribes. No doubt, this conspiracy gives extra bonus at group pride (old dynasties
were all from north, Huang-ho river and surrounding, weren’t they?). But the
interlocking migration pattern tells them away.
To make matters worse, I would venture into an old hat trick: the case of Hakka.
Clearly a Han-ren situation. To compare, read this <1.4>:
The Hakka were called “guest people”when they began migrating into Yue-speaking
territory, and the exotic name seems to have stuck quite simply because, until fairly
recently, many Cantonese and Min mistakenly thought that the Hakka were not Chinese
at all, but rather some kind of strange non-Han "barbarians" like the Tai or the Miao.”
That the south of China is more heterogeneous than the north of China seems to
be true without exception, from history to geography, ecology and culture, and
now genetics. The greater heterogeneity of southern China is likely to reflect the
greater geographic fragmentation of this area, resulting in greater isolation of
local populations, probably mostly determined by the nature of the environment
as Cavalli-Sforza as shown. This southern population had more in common with
their cousin from the bordering states (Laos, Cambodja, Thailand, Myanmar,
Malaysia and Vietnam) than with their northern couterparts, which in turn were
more related to Mongol, Tibetan and Nepali groups <1.5>.
2. Civilised vs barbarians.
My other striking notice comes from the Russian Orientalist Lev N. Gumilev who
strongly advocated at the narrowing scope of Han-ren versus Barbarians <2.2>.
He argumented the case of the Xiong-nu as interested in barter, trade with the
Empire, and that neither the Qing nor Han took any interest in exhanging with
their northern neighbours adding that in their clashes the nomads never took
territorial concessions! Not conciliatory enough Gumilev adds the showcase of
the epoch-making Touba sinizised as Wei (see 3.2):
Yet all the measures (change language of administration, the Xianbei dress and hair
style forbidden) failed to reconcile the Chinese population.
In this chapter I will explore the variety of peoples who came in touch with the
Chinese empire and are oft-hidden in the vastness of the rich civilisation of
China. "At last the whole world is mine," the first Han emperor, Liu Bang, is said
to have declared as he claimed the imperial throne in 202 B.C. Far from the
whole world, his power extended across a territory only about half as large as
today's China. Moving forwards, the “United China” -as the name clearly tells
‘Zhong Guo’ (the Central Country)-, or the place where everythings starts and
from where everything is controlled-, for example only one time zone where the
US mainland has got three! Somehow is pretended that the relationship
between the Chinese and Barbarians had, through marriage between royal
families and meetings leading to alliances, cemented political and kinship ties of
unity and political friendship, and formed close economic and cultural relations,
laying a solid foundation for the ultimate founding of a unified nation. Peace is
required –the word pax comes from ‘pactus’, which implies ‘two parties’: union,
empire and civilised are equated.
The film Hero shows the First Qin emperor pondering the meaning of the
outstanding character “espasa” at the end of the film. He sums up: ‘peace’.
Likewise, twenty years later, the victorous Han above mentioned put his capital
in the city of Changan ("eternal peace"), whose ruins lie today in the suburbs of
its bustling, tourist-packed successor, Xian ("western peace").
But mostly idyllic lies can not hide the blunt truth. Everybody is aware of the Qin
dynasty (or Chin, from which "China" derives) being the first dynasty to weld
China's quarreling kingdoms into a single state. To put it short, it was cruel and
soon collapsed. Either under the pressure of strife or appeased from the royal
treasure - as Gernet shown in his book- Barbarians were not accepted unless
sinizised. From Li Chi, ca. the end of the Chou dynasty, describing the
surrounding peoples <3.1> .
A. Sichuan enters in scene. Their first recorded inhabitants were the Ba and
Shu peoples, who lived in what was then called Liangzhou from about 2000 BC.
The Shu people lived on the Chengdu Plain while the Ba kingdom was centered in
Eastern Sichuan.
The Qin Dynasty, in its drive to establish a single rule over all Chinese societies,
invades and subdues some Thai principalities or kingdoms located in what are
now Sichuan and Yunnan areas, like those of the Pa and the Ngio. These
kingdoms are annexed placing a part of those groups considered ancestors of
present-day Thais under central Chinese rule.
In 316 B.C., the rising semi-barbarian kingdom of Qin conquered the Shu and Ba
peoples, and turned them into prefectures in order to take advantage of the
fertile plain and secure his hold on Sichuan, he moved thousands of Qin faithful
to Chengdu, the former Shu Kingdom’s capital. Efforts were made to develop the
mountainous region thereafter. The Qin kingdom, under the soon-to-be Emperor
Qin Shi Wang, then went on to conquer all of China.
This ushered a new age for Sichuan - the settled and more sophisticated peoples
of the Yellow River valley migrated to the Sichuan Basin, intermarried with the
local Shu and Ba, which will take part in our new move southwards.
B. Behind the cloudy scenery of Yunnan. Around 200 B.C. forces of the
Chinese Han Dynasty invade Yunnan in order to have an unrestricted land
communication with India (yun in Chinese means "clouds" and nan "south").
Sima Qian, the author of The Records of the Historian, was among the emissaries
sent by Emperor Wu on his way to India to inquire about the teachings of
Buddha. In his writing on the southwest indigenous peoples- the first
comprehensive record of that region- he mentions more than twenty native
groups, the ancestors of contemporary minorities. To summarise, the province of
Yunnan shows today a perfect patchwork of many ethic populations living side by
side. That should have been the situation at the Han times.
On the other hand, tribes began emigration from the steppes mainly to the
southwest and southeast for better pasture. Weakness of Han's court also
encouraged the tribes to move further into China. For example Tu fa tribe, (an
offshoot of the Tui Yin, part of the strong Xiabei) settled in the eastern
mountainous area of today Qinghai province.
Between the year 122 B.C.-51 a.C. the small proto-Thai Kingdom of Aliao (the
kingdom remains widely independent as a Chinese vassal until 225) is formed by
inhabitants in Yunnan and migrants from territories earlier settled by proto-Thais
but then conquered by Chinese armies. Already at this stage, a tendency is
established for those ethnic groups seen as ancestors of present-day Thais to
move southwards to evade Chinese pressure. This trend continued throughout
the centuries. However, the Thais at that early time did not seem to flee from
Chinese rule as a complete group or as an expelled nation. The whole ethnic Thai
group somehow splits, with each of the two groups developing independently in
the following centuries. Those in the north (the areas of present-day Yunnan and
neighboring Chinese provinces) develop their culture and language with Chinese
and Annamese (Vietnamese) influences and more and more are assimilated into
Chinese and Vietnamese societies.
After this initial contact, the upper classes of these indigenous peoples were
culturally assimilated by the Han Chinese and parts of the Thai populations
remained in Chinese-ruled areas, intermarried with Chinese, assimilated and
finally became Chinese. Confucian schools were built with the support of the
Chinese government. However, the Chinese influence reached only the urban
areas, and the lifestyle of the natives living in the countryside was left
undisturbed until the twentieth century.
During the Era of Three Kingdoms in China (220-589), southern Chinese troops
attack Thai settled areas, beat the Thais in battle and submit them to the rule of
the King of Sichuan.
By the mid-seventh century Thais in their former areas of settlement, today's
Chinese Yunnan and southern Sichuan provinces, rebel against the Chinese and
succeed in winning back their sovereignty. Out of this victory grows the kingdom
Nanchao (650-902), first ruled by King Sinulo. Instead of trying to subdue this
new kingdom through military force, the Chinese Emperor Kao Tsung of the Tang
Dynasty rather accepts its existence and binds it to China through a treaty of
friendship.
C. From the high lands of Tu-fan. The dynasty also had to deal with Qiang
(and Di) on the western border. The Qiang, nominal ancestor of modern Tibetans,
had begun carrying out campaigns of invasion but never were successful. They
played their part in the “great game of war” and eventualy were a frequent ally
with the Han court against Xianbei and the Xiongnu although it sometimes allied
with Xiongnu to fend off joint attacks by the Han and Xianbei.
That being the state of affairs, when from further west, Tibet emerged as a
unified state and a mighty empire under Emperor Songtsen Gampo. They were
known as Tu-fan or Tubo. With his rule, an era of political and military greatness
and territorial expansion started that lasted for three centuries. Two landmarks
were Trisong Detsen (755-797) who expanded the Tibetan empire by conquering
parts of China and invading her capital Chang'an in 763 so that China had to pay
an annual tribute to Tibet which lasted 20 years. A peace treaty concluded
between Tibet and China in 821 reads as follows:
Tibet and China shall abide by the frontiers of which they are now in occupation. All to
the east is the country of great China; and all to the west is, without question, the
country of great Tibet. Henceforth, on neither side shall there be waging of war nor
seizing of territory. <3.3>
By mid-VIIIth century three powers are consolidated in the area. As the Tibetan
expansion threatens the Chinese at the southwest frontiers, the Chinese Emperor
Ming Li of the Tang Dynasty enters into alliances with local Thai and other
principalities at the southern and southwestern border of the Chinese empire.
Among the kingdoms with which the Chinese form such an alliance is Nanchao
with the Sionulo Dinasty (650-902), being his king Pilaoko recognized by the
Chinese court as Prince of Yunnan with the task of repelling all danger at the
Chinese southwest border. This gives the Thais an excuse to launch a war of
conquest against Tibet. Nanchao swaps chances on both sides becoming a power
to be considered in Southeast Asia and south China at the eyes of the weak Tang
dynasty. The last fifty years of the Sinulo dinasty they expanded towards
Vietnam and Chengdu with uncertain gains. To conclude:
Thereafter, for a considerable period of time Nanchao is not mentioned in
Chinese annals. Common belief is that the following three-and-one-half centuries
of Nanchao's relations with China were more peaceful than the last two-and-one-
half centuries. As troublesome neighbor (or what Chinese officials would have
considered as such) the Nanchao kingdom would certainly have figured more
prominently in Chinese records than it actually did for the next three-and-one-
half centuries <3.4>.
For several centuries, Nanchao will, for most of the time, remain an ally of China
and in the course of late history become more and more Chinese in its character.
In 1254 Kublai Khan annexes Nanchao. Waves of Thai migrants move south,
especially into the then already existing Thai state Sukhothai, considerably
enhancing Sukhothai's population and power base.
The Xianbei confederacy will be our first case of study. Tan Shi Huai managed to
unify all Xianbei tribes under a military and commercial confederacy against the
Han's court at the third quarter of the 2nd century. The confederacy was a
rudiment of a centralized government. All tribes had to share all trade profits,
military duties and a unified stance against the Han's court. Supported by this
confederacy, he brought Southern Xiongnu to a close alliance (including at times
Wuhuan, Dingling, Qiang and Di) which at that time stretched from today
Jilin province to central Xinjiang.
The Touba will be our second case of study. It is thought the dynasty Bei Wei
originated from the Tuoba (originally Tabghach, a clan of the Xianbei people –
famous at the Tan Shi Huai confederacy). Their main fixture was to establish the
Northern Wei Dynasty in year AD 386 and reunited northern China in AD 439.
They took the northern of the west to the Xiong-nu ar the north of the Shangxi,
then the Gansu corridor to the Liang and the Chinese lands of the Yan. This
particular series of frontier formations were not related to nomadic life or Chinese
society but a well weigh up mixture. The organisation of the lands in the 5th
century gains the respect of some Southern Chinese (Jin). The official state
religion was Taoism in the beginning as a result of the influence of K'ou Ch'ien-
chih but the new faith of Buddism got strong support as the great grottos reveal
their majesty still today.
The Tuobas renamed themselves the Yuans as a part of systematic sinicization
and left their original language in 494 to adopt Chinese.
Perfectley settled, their key move was to place the capital 700 km south in
Luoyang (current Longmen) in 474. More precisely:
La sinisation des Tuoba s’accélère. Les marriages mixtes sont très fréquents et les
familles adoptent des noms chinois (xing). En 471, le clan Touba au pouvoir prend le
pseudonyme ‘Yuan’. Les vêtements, les coutumes, la culture, la langue chinois sont ou
deviennnet obligatoires. La langue ‘barbare’ est interdite à la court de Luoyang. Le
mécénat des Touba envers le boudhisme peut être asussi interprété comme un desir
d’assimilation <3.8>.
Epilogue. Playing against the odds I will subscribe the insightful words of
Gumilev:
The odd combination at the eyes of the Chinese procuded a handful of kingdoms that
lost their connection with the steppe (case of the Tang or Liao (Khitan). That was not the
case of the last two succesful empires the Yuan and the Jürchen Jin, but they belong to
another era. (op. cit. page 33)
Our chapter will end as it started with conquers from the northwest:
In 1207, the Tangut Empire north of Tibet fell to the advancing Mongols, and in
1271, the Mongols announced the establishment of the Mongol Yuan Dynasty to
rule the Eastern part of the Empire. By 1279, the Chinese Song dynasty in
southern China fell before the advancing armies and the Mongols completed their
conquest of China.
The silk road was exporting paper and porcelain as well. At the first century the
trade with the west was consolidated with foreign merchants (some open space
in the new capitals which were empty and didn’t reperesent the whole of the
population –slaves, working in agriculture.
I already stated in the introduction that one of the many things that left me in
bafflement at the time of studying the first unit was the divergence of alphabets
in Asia. Languages are not writing systems: the first ones are the software, the
second ones the hardware. When something is printed you have a material thing.
A cultural construct if you like. The transmission of these civilizised artifacts
indicates the craftmanship of the human race. The main direction in Southeast
Asia was the dominance of Chinese features, and Buddhism in the other
direction.
By far, and concerning my research interest (as I told you in my first mail) I still
consider the best display those found in a couple of plates inside an excellent
classic such as Le monde chinois by Jacques Gernet about writing systems the
introductory chapter of Dealing with Language systems in Asia, I found showing
the great diversity and a clear account of the main writing systems in Eastern
Asia and their origins (pages 38-39) that I display below:
4.1. The circles of expansion in the ancient world: Korea, Vietnam &
japan
Chinese characters are one of the most distinctive artifacts of Oriental culture.
Chinese characters stood as a visible symbol of the dominance of Chinese culture
in East Asia. With
Chinese characters came huge numbers of Chinese loanwords, which are still an
important part of the vocabulary of East Asian languages. Chinese characters,
Hanzi, are called ‘Hancha’ in Korean and ‘Kanji’ in Japanese which, incidentally,
all three use the very same two Chinese characters.
The expansion of China warlords gave those neighbouring peoples a new writing
tool for their own tongues: Koreans (IV cent. AD), Japanese (IV-V cent. AD), and
Vietnamese (VIII cent. AD). Considering the fact that the respective languages
belong to different families, the effort come short of nothing less than a great
deed. Korean, Japanese, and Vietnamese were originally complete 'strangers'
belonging to different language families. Roughly 2,000 years ago, the less
developed Vietnamese, Korean and Japanese cultures came into China's orbit,
whether willingly or unwillingly, creating what might be termed an 'East Asian
cultural sphere'.
Gumilev, Lev N. Earches for an Imaginary Kingdom. The legend of the kingdomof Prester
John (Cambridge University Press, 1987) [1970]
Katzner, K. The Languages of the World, London, Routkledge, 1990
Nelson, S. The Archeology of Northern China (beyond the Grat Wall), Routledge, New
York, 1995
www.omniglot.com has been the most productive website for the topic, especially for the
visual display of the scripts. Highly recommended to anyone interested in the topic.
The Cambridge History of China. Vol. I. The Ch’in and Han Emprires. Taipei, 1986
Footnotes
<1.1> J. Diamond is Professor of Geography at the Ucla
http://www.edge.org/3rd_culture/diamond_rich/rich_p8.html
<1.2> In the article “Asia Profiling”:
www.time.com/asia/chinatime/2003/journey/china_gsh_jen.html
<1.3>Harrell quoted in http://home.wlu.edu/~blackmerh/anth230/ethnicities.html
<1.4> In their diaspora, those pioneers were called “Lao Fa Kiao” (Old Chinese Abroad).
And their decendents see themselves as Chinese, because they have strong ties to their
roots and bound by a common language. (quoting Robert Ramsey) :
http://home.i1.net/~alchu/hakka/toihak2.htm
<1.5> The Chinese Human Genome Diversity Project. (PNAS vol. 95, Issue 20,
1998). Chu et al. strongly support the existence of a genetic difference between
northern and southern Chinese, which, as mentioned in their paper, already was reached
by a variety of other approaches, archeological, craniometric, and dental.
http://www.pnas.org/cgi/content/full/95/20/11501
<1.6> Similar to the northern border at the Roman Empire against the Germanic tribes.
<2.1> Searches for an imaginary kingdom page 33. His home page
http://gumilevica.kulichki.net/english.html
<3.1> Book III Section 3.14. The people of those five regions-the Middle states, and the
Zung, Î, (and other wild tribes round them)--had all their several natures, which they
could not be made to alter. The tribes on the east were called Î. They had their hair
unbound, and tattooed their bodies. Some of them ate their food without its being
cooked. Those on the south were called Man. They tattooed their foreheads, and had
their feet turned in towards each other. Some of them (also) ate their food without its
being cooked. Those on the west were called Zung. They had their hair unbound, and
wore skins. Some of them did not eat grain-food. Those on the north were called Tî. They
wore skins of animals and birds, and dwelt in caves. Some of them also did not eat
grain-food. http://www.sacred-texts.com/cfu/liki/liki03.htm
<3.2> Further south all the Indo-china populations were put under great strain and the
populations of the area (today the remains of these peoples can be found in Andaman
islands and the shores of New Guinea) had to cope with the invaders from the Yang-tze
region. The studies of Cavalli-Sforza showed that this southern population had more in
common with their cousin from the bordering states (Laos, Cambodja, Thailand,
Myanmar, Malaysia and Vietnam) than with their northern couterparts, which in turn
were more related to Mongol, Tibetan and Nepali groups. Today the modern inhabitants
of Indonesia and the Philippines are fairly homogeneous in their genes and appearance
and resemble southern Chinese.
<3.3> The story is of particular importance in illustrating the nature of relations
between these two great powers of Asia. The text of this treaty, both in Tibetan and
Chinese, was inscribed on three stone pillars: one was erected in Gungu Meru to
demarcate the borders between the two nations, second in Lhasa where it still stands,
and the third in the Chinese capital of Chang'an.
<3.4> http://www.csam.montclair.edu/earth/eesweb/feng/eastasia.htmln
<3.5> Our readings on new agents in the lands (Tujue, Khitan and Jurgen) before the
well-studied Mongols will have to wait to further work. The Xiong-nu name meaning
Xiong's Slaves (Xiong being a Chinese transliteration of a national name but also
meaning 'savage/raucous/ferocious') was the term given by the Chinese to nomadic
tribes on their northern boarder under the control of the Xion of Trans-Jaxartes perhaps
based around Sibir. Variations include: Hun-no, Xiung-Nu, Hsiong-Nu, Hsiung-Nu, Hiung-
No or Xianyun. As for the Xian bei (or Hsien-Pi) eren els del ‘nord’.
<3.6> In other words, this first “far-west” put on European soil some groups of Asian
stock previous to the Magyars (the Bulgarians, the Huns, the Avars, the Pechenegs and
the Cumans –from this last group we have nowadays the ‘Comenius exchange students
program!? as a homege to Jan Komensky, a real European avant-la-létre).
<3.7> Wu Hu literally means "five non-Chinese races", hence giving its another name
the Five Hu. Wu Hu were composed of five nomadic tribes: Xiongnu , Xianbei, Di, Qiang
and Jie. This composition of Wu Hu is the most accepted since those five tribes were the
major ones. The term Wu Hu was first used in Cui Hong's Shiliuguochunqiu, which
recorded the history of the five tribes' ravaging Northern China from the early 4th
century. Sovereignties founded by Wu Hu were coined the ‘Sixteen Kingdoms’, short-
lived sovereignities after the retreat of the Jin Dynasty.
<3.8> page 322 in Arts et histoire de Chine.
<4.1> We Know that ‘Qin’ was the name of the Chinese given by the Hindus as the
western kingdom of Qin had the first contacts (started at the beginning of the 3rd century
b. C. across the Sichuan lands southward the Himalayan range). If we observe the
spelling the “Q” and the “CH” sound the same: apalatal sound. In our cultural circles the
word is spelled “sino-“ as in sino-sovietic, due to the contact with Catholic people in the
XVI century. The modern languages go back to the palatal sound.
<4.2> I will follow www.buddha.net here His Ssu-ti-ching had 3620 characters, with no
concept transliterated.
<4.3> From this time we have the word for ‘sutra’ in Chinese (related to our “sutura”,
and translated the eymological sense: ‘enfilall’). As late as this century, he wrote in the
Ta-t’ang His-yü-chi:
Sanskrit words should be translated. One must make an effort to keep the original form.
Take the pattern of the orthodox textbooks, infer and then discourse about them. I fear
to pervert the truth.