Professional Documents
Culture Documents
NVIDIA CORPORATION, )
) Civil Action No.: 1:08-cv-473
Plaintiff, )
)
v. )
)
RAMBUS, INC. )
)
Defendant. )
___________________________________ )
Defendant’s opposition makes it clear that both parties would like the Court to rule
currently scheduled to take place in the California Action on December 5, 2008. (See
D.E. 31, at p. 2). Defendant, however, objects to Plaintiff’s request that the Court
basis. (Id.). Plaintiff respectfully suggests that the Court should consider those motions
jointly on an expedited basis because: (1) the evidence and law pertaining to both
motions are substantially related (such motions are often contained in a single pleading,
yet Defendant chose to file its Motion to Transfer a week after filing its Motion to
Dismiss); and (2) if the Court fails to rule on Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss prior to the
California Action’s CMC, the parties will still not have certainty regarding what claims
will be allowed to proceed in North Carolina, thus defeating the purpose of expedited
consideration altogether.
unresolved questions the Court may have, Plaintiff of course defers to the Court.
Respectfully submitted,
-and-
-2-
Via ECF:
-3-