Professional Documents
Culture Documents
10, 40
MAR CH 2011 | VOLUME 17 | ISSUE 3
INSIDE:
TECHNICALLY SPEAKING: Paints and Brushes STUDIO SENSE: The Upside of Limitations
ELECTRO-VOICE
RE320 A CLASSIC
UPDATED
APOGEES
Mighty Mini
one
more reviews
Focal XS Satellite Focusrite ISA 428 MkII Focusrite OctoPre Dynamic MkII Sescom IL-19 Extreme Hum Fighter
www.proaudioreview.com
in this issue
Studio
Covering Recording, Broadcast Production, and Post Production New Studio Products 10
Cover Story 24
ProAudioReview
MARCH 2011 | VOLUME 17 | ISSUE 3
Sound Reinforcement
Covering Live Sound, Contracting, and Installed Sound New Live Products 40
Review 48
Sescom IL-19
by Frank Wells
Review 29
48
Review 32
Departments
Technically Speaking
Review 34
Studio Sense 20
29 32
Cover Photo: Konrad Snyder Cover Design: Annmarie LaScala
Geared Up 38
PRO AUDIO REVIEW (ISSN 1083-6241) is published monthly by NewBay Media LLC, 28 E 28th Street, 12th floor, New York, NY 10016. Subscription information can be found at www.MyPARmag.com, by calling 212-378-0400, or writing to the above address. Letters to the editor are welcomed at the above address or par@nbmedia.com. Periodicals postage paid at New York, NY 10016 and additional mailing offices. POSTMASTER: Send address changes to Pro Audio Review, P.O. Box 282, Lowell, MA 01853. Copyright 2011 by NewBay Media, L.L.C. PRINTED IN U.S.A.
M A R C H 2 011
VOLUME 3
ISSUE 3
EDITORIAL Frank Wells, Editorial Director 212-378-0400 x535, fwells@nbmedia.com Strother Bullins, Reviews And Features Editor 336-703-9932, strotherPAR@earthlink.net Fred Goodman, Managing Editor 212-378-0423, fgoodman@nbmedia.com Lynn Fuston, Technical Editor Rich Tozzoli, Software Editor Russ Long, Senior Contributor Ty Ford, Steve Harvey, Will James, Tom Jung, Alex Oana, Randy Poole, Alan Silverman, Rob Tavaglione, Ben Williams, Sterling Wineld, Dan Wothke, Tom Young, Contributors Paul Haggard, Photographer ADVERTISING Tara Preston, Associate Publisher 917-331-8904, tpreston@nbmedia.com Karen Godgart, Sales Director, West Coast Ofce 323-868-5416, kgodgart@nbmedia.com Contessa Abono, Specialty Sales Associate, North 650-238-0296, cabono@nbmedia.com Donovan Boyle, Specialty Sales Associate, South 650-238-0325, dboyle@nbmedia ART & PRODUCTION Nicole Cobban, Senior Art Director Annmarie LaScala, Art Director Fred Vega, Production Manager 212-378-0445, fvega@nbmedia.com CIRCULATION Tracey H. Dwyer, Associate Circulation Director, Audience Development Michele Fonville, Circulation Coordinator Subscriptions: Pro Audio Review, www.MyPARmag.com P.O. Box 234, Lowell, Ma 01853 Tel: 888-266-5828 (U.S.A. Only, 8:30 A.M. - 5 P.M. Est) 978-667-0352 (Outside The U.S.) Fax: 978-671-0460 E-Mail: Newbay@Computerfulllment.com NEWBAY MEDIA AUDIO GROUP John Pledger, Vice President/Group Publishing Director Anthony Savona, Editorial/Creative Director Ragan Whiteside, Web Director Robert Granger, Online Production Manager Ashley Vermillion, Web Production Specialist NEWBAY MEDIA CORPORATE Steve Palm, President & CEO Paul Mastronardi, Chief Financial Ofcer Joe Ferrick, Vice President Of Web Development Denise Robbins, Circulation Director Greg Topf, IT Director Jack Liedke, Controller Ray Vollmer, HR Director REPRINTS AND PERMISSIONS: For Article Reprints, Please Contact Our Reprint Coordinator At Wrights Media: 877-652-5295 PRINTED IN THE U.S.A. Administrative, Advertising, & Editorial Ofces 28 E 28th Street, 12th oor New York, NY 10016 TEL: (212) 378-0400 FAX: (212) 378-0435 E-MAIL: pro@nbmedia.com
technically speaking
Frank Wells
10
www.proaudioreview.com
16
18
opinion
studio sense
by Rob Tavaglione
Classic analog tape machines, a.k.a., desirable limitations from days of yore.
tions (both artistic and technical) that forced us to commit, to scheme, to solve, to compromise, to refine and to clarify. Responses to such limitations are human nature; without them, is our work increasingly less than human? Im no student of psychology, or sociology or religion, so I dont understand why it is that humans are often a bit boring, lazy and wishy-washy when entirely comfortable, yet often creative, focused and ultra-productive when forced, often uncomfortably, by hardship. Are we somehow wired to only give 100 percent when absolutely necessary? Does this somehow explain why many performers only do their very best when facing difficult odds under unreasonable conditions? Perhaps the human mind needs the clarification that challenges bring to truly excel. Tell a performer and/or a producer that they have unlimited track count available; that you can undo anything; that you can correct tone, rhythm or pitch. Suddenly, wheres the motivation to push? This may ring familiar with you I
am friends with a producer who has told me of his successful Manhattan client with literally hundreds of vocal takes per song. This (obviously well funded) client insisted on keeping all takes, month after month, just in case, all at 96k until the point where my friend had multiple drives full of data with sessions that seemed to take forever to open. And yes, the client never went back and used these tracks; they obviously served as some form of performance pacifier, a security blanket, and a means of putting off decision-making and artistic/personal committal. Time constraints arent really the ideal handicaps to introduce here (as they sometimes simply create panic). Im thinking some kind of physical or conceptual limitation to force ourselves into the hero mode limitations that force creative problem-solving, prioritizing and focus. A maximum acceptable track count may be helpful, but maybe more inspiring types of negative stimulus are the key here. Forced spontaneity; unfamiliar instruments or conditions; recording an
ensemble completely live; an absence of processing or effects; minimal microphones: All these things just might elicit once-in-a-lifetime performances. Even as a little kid, I knew I wanted to be an audio engineer because I always fantasized of re-mixing my favorite records, those that I thought had less-than-stellar production. I dreamt of re-recording them with the highest fidelity, all the right fader moves and then bowling over the masses. Yet now, high fidelity is pretty easily achievable to most anyone, and I hear virtually perfect, simply fantastic recordings all the time that do not bowl over the masses. Are our listeners simply jaded from the sheer number of technically high-quality productions out there today, or are they simply missing more emotion, more sincerity, more humanity than our typical modern methodologies allow? I believe they recognize an absence of underlying tension, heightened passion and the sounds of a struggling underdog while overachieving.
by Russ Long
Apogee ONE is a sleek, beautifully designed USB audio interface. Its compact size (slightly larger than an iPhone) and single-knob interface make it visually reminiscent of the classic iPod. ONE is USB-powered and features a mono mic/line input, built-in microphone and stereo output. The device provides 24-bit audio at sample rates of 44.1 kHz or 48 kHz at a quality deserving of the Apogee name. ONE is compatible with any Mac-based Core Audio-compliant application (including Pro Tools 9). Features The $249 ONE measures 2.25 x 4.75 x 1 inches and weighs approximately 1 pound. It includes the ONE interface, breakout cable, USB cable, Apogee Software & Documentation CD and QuickStart Guide. The breakout cable provides audio input via a female XLR or a 1/4-inch jack. The balanced microphone (XLR) input provides 10-63 dB of gain with a maximum input level of +14 dBu and the unbalanced (1/4inch) instrument input provides 0 to 45 dB of gain with a maximum input level of +11 dBu. Choosing the internal electret condenser microphone also allows gain settings of 0 to 45 dB. Stereo output is provided via an unbalanced 1/8-inch jack with
a maximum output level of +12 dBu, perfectly suited to drive headphones or powered speakers. The ONE mic mount ($19.95) makes it possible to mount the ONE on any standard mic stand and the ONE Table Top Mic Stand ($19.95) is a 6.5inch tall tripod that perfectly complements the mic mount. Apogees soft neoprene carry case ($19.95) is the perfect way to make sure ONE stays protected during transport. Apogees Maestro software is the link between ONE and the computer. I downloaded the most recent version from the Apogee site (always a good idea just in case an included disc is outdated) and installation was a breeze. Squeezing into only 34MB of hard drive space, the application requires Mac OS 10.5.7 or later to operate. I was already familiar with the software after logging a bunch of time with the Symphony system
Russ Long is a Nashville-based producer, engineer and mixer as well as a senior contributor to PAR. russlong.ws
24 ProAudioReview | March 2011 www.proaudioreview.com
a couple of years ago, and I found the single input/stereo output version that works in tandem with ONE to be simple and intuitive. Maestros Mixer and Control pages provide full control of the applications features. The Mixer page displays a fader, mute and solo buttons, and metering for the single input and the From Software channels as well as larger metering for the To Hardware output level. Metering includes input level and digital over display after conversion from analog to digital. The Control page includes gain controls for the input and output levels as well as input selection between Int Mic, Ext Mic, Ext 48V Mic and Instrument. Stereo output should be selected when ONE is connected to headphones, powered speakers, or a mixing console and Amp should be selected when ONE is connected to an instrument amplifier. When Amp is selected, ONEs output level is fixed making it better suited for instrument amplifier inputs. In Use Ergonomically, ONEs design is fantastic. Pressing the large silver knob encoder cycles through the input and output options allowing you to make input or output gain adjustments without using the Maestro application. One of four encoder function LED indicators
is always illuminated indicating what the encoder is controlling. A three-segment LED meter reflects the input or output level of the selected function. When making a gain adjustment, a window similar to a Macs volume display window appears on the screen showing the input or output being adjusted. Holding the button for a second mutes the output a great feature in the event of a noisy software glitch. In addition to using ONE as an external soundcard, the device provides the option of low-latency live monitoring that can be set up through Maestros control panel. The biggest limitation of ONE is that it only supports sample rates of 44.1 and 48 kHz, prohibiting it from recording to high-resolution projects. This will likely be a deterrent to many potential buyers. The breakout cable is the perfect length, and its locking connector prohibits it from being accidentally detached while in use. While placing the output jack on the bottom of the device makes perfect sense for headphones, its a bit awkward for speaker connection. I anticipate that more people will use ONE with headphones, but having a parallel output on the top of ONE for speaker output would have been a nice feature. ONEs headphone amp is surprisingly good. When traveling and
www.proaudioreview.com
25
just listening to music for pleasure, Ive found that the tradeoff for the extra hassle of using ONE (pulling out an extra device and connecting it to my laptop instead of just plugging my headphones into the computer) is well worth it due to the sound improvement. This sound quality was equally good through a pair of Dynaudio BM 5A powered monitors. In both instances, the imaging is wide and the clarity is superb at both soft and loud volume levels. I was initially skeptical of the quality of the built-in mic but was pleasantly surprised after
Fast Facts
Applications Applications: Project Studio, Broadcast, Location Recording, Mobile Recording Key Features Features: Built-in mic; balanced XLR mic pre and unbalanced -inch high-impedance instrument input; software-selectable 48V phantom power; 1/8-inch stereo output; multi-function encoder knob for input gain control and output level control; Core Audio compatible; 24-bit 44.1 kHz or 48 kHz operation; 4 encoder function LED indicators; 3-segment LED input and output metering; Apogees Maestro software for hardware control and low-latency monitoring Price Price: $249 Contact Apogee Digital | 310-584-9394 | apogeedigital.com
Product Points
Compact size; low price; great sound quality; phantom power
support beyond 48 kHz; no PC No support ONE is the affordable mono solution for high-quality mobile recording.
using it to record vocals and guitars. At first, many vocalists may feel awkward singing into something that looks like an iPod but the sound quality is so shockingly good that they may quickly grow accustomed to it. ONE works equally well on acoustic guitar, making it the only device available that will allow you to record full demos or podcasts without needing to purchase an extra mic. I used ONEs mic pre to record a vocal with the Sony C-800G and the result was stunning. While ONEs pre wouldnt be my first choice while working in the studio, I wouldnt hesitate to use it to capture a critical lead vocal or instrument overdub if I was working in a hotel, apartment or somewhere else on the move; its sound quality is beyond anything Ive encountered in the same price range and on par with that of other Apogee products. I recorded electric guitar through ONE along with Line 6s Amp Farm on a Pro Tools 9 session, and it worked great. It worked equally well when recording a bass guitar. Maestro allows various setups to be stored, making it quick and easy to switch between sound sources and mics with minimal setup time. After recording bass, I saved a setup named Gibson EB-2, so the next time I record that bass through the 1/4-inch input, Ill have a reasonably close starting point. I also used ONEs built-in mic to record a bands rehearsal. Besides being limited to a mono recording, it works extremely well, making it the perfect tool for capturing rehearsals and performances to create work tapes as arrangements are worked out before going in the studio. During the review period, I used the ONE along with Pro Tools, Garage Band, Nuendo and Logic, and in every instance, it worked flawlessly. While the biggest weakness of the ONE is its lack of PC compatibility, it could easily be argued that this is yet another significant reason to switch from PC to Mac. Summary Apogee ONE provides a wonderful combination of features, portability and most important, sound quality, at an amazing price point. Any mobile user in need of only a single input should give ONE top consideration.
Score
26
www.proaudioreview.com
studio review
by Strother Bullins
Ive been a fan of Focusrites OctoPre 8-channel mic preamps for some time now. More than 12 years ago, I used the original OctoPre as a front end to a modest recording rig (literally six good microphones, the OctoPre, and a blackface ADAT) to self-record three complete drum sessions at home, ultimately to be used alongside stiff competition: truly great-sounding drum sessions with a real engineer at what was then Masterfonics Studio Six on Music Row in Nashville.
Yet once mixed to the same standards to reside on the same CD, those two extremes in gear and environments became surprisingly immaterial. Thus, when Focusrite announced its latest incarnation of the OctoPre, the MkII Dynamic, my interest was piqued by what it may provide to our industrys continuously growing pool of self-recordists and/or budget-minded audio pros. Features Size 1U, the MkII Dynamic offers all of the same features as the original, plus literally More: in my opinion, the most significant new tool of the MkII Dynamic is More, the simple on/off button per channel that takes each channels one-knob compressor (Compress, which adjusts threshold) and doubles its usefulness. In normal mode, the fixed compression ratio is 2:1; with More, its 4:1, allowing some creative, easy compression-based effects to be laid within selected tracks. Both modes attack times are 1.2ms; release times are 28ms. In a word, More is cool, and especially cool for creative drum tracking. What else is cool about the MkII Dynamic? The same things that were
cool in the original, plus added refinements and improvements in I/O. The front panel offers a preamp Gain rotary per channel alongside the aforementioned Compress knob and More button. Per channel, three helpful LEDs light red, yellow, and red to indicate overload (O/L), active compression, and More ratio doubling, respectively. Next, an 8 x 5 segment LED meter shows per-channel signal levels pre-A/D. Also on the front panel are instrument input selector buttons for channels 1 and 2; two phantom power on/off buttons for channels 1-4 and 5-8; and digital I/O selection via sample rate (44.1 to 96k), clock source (internal, word clock or ADAT), and an AD/DA button to send digital ADAT input to the MkII Dynamics eight line outputs, the latter of which effectively makes the unit an 24-bit, 8-channel D/A converter. Rear panel I/O includes eight Neutrik 1/4inch/XLR combo jacks for channel inputs; eight 1/4-inch line outputs; two ADAT/ Optical/Lightpipe inputs; two ADAT/Optical/ Lightpipe outputs; and BNC word clock
Strother Bullins is the reviews and features editor for Pro Audio Review.
28 ProAudioReview | March 2011 www.proaudioreview.com
input and output connectors. Per 1/4-inch input, either TRS (balanced) or TS (unbalanced) can be used. In Use The MkII Dynamic was as clean and userfriendly as I remember the original to be, and I used the new one quite a bit over the past two months. From conservative compression levels on all inputs to wildly slammed/squished More settings on the majority of inputs, recordings with the MkII Dynamic were as pure, or as colored, as desired. For example, a group of musicians and I collectively flipped over a pair of room mics (AKG Perception 820 tubes), in omni and under the heavy hand of More, about 1/2 compressed from the maximum position simply fun, classic,and rockin, agreed the group. Meanwhile, crucial sound sources that called out for clean transduction and no tracking compression such as a dynamic male vocal via Sontronics Orpheus large-diaphragm condenser in cardioid and a detailed ostinato on a 21-inch Sabian HH Series Vintage Ride cymbal via a Shure KSM141 condenser stereo pair in omni were appropriately captured with the MkII Dynamics superb Saffire preamps. Summary The Focusrite OctoPre MkII Dynamic is quite possibly the best bargain in 8-channel preamps currently available, as it streets for $699. Eight preamps and eight channel compressors featuring the neat More comp ratio doubler, plus its comprehensive analog/digital I/O? Its not only a bargain; it could be considered a steal. For that reason, I will enthusiastically recommend the MkII Dynamic to any of my self-recording brethren as well as to any budget-restricted engineer in need of eight solid preamp-plus-compression channels. Price: $799 list Contact: Focusrite | focusrite.com U.S. distributor: American Music & Sound | 800-431-2609 | americanmusicandsound.com
by Rich Tozzoli
It is in our nature to be skeptical, for most of us anyway. So, after Focusrite announced that the update to the classic ISA 428 the MkII would be less expensive than the original, yet maintain the same signal path, how could I not initially question its quality? Being a happy owner of the original ISA 428, I wanted to give the new MkII a thorough, comparative runthrough.
There are a few reasons why I like the original ISA 428: It has four high-quality channels; VU and digital metering; variable impedance, Hi-Z 1/4-inch inputs on the front panel; variable high-pass filters; a digital I/O option; 1/4-inch inserts; and, most importantly, it sounds very good.
Features Breaking the new MkII out of its shipping box, I stacked it right on top of my original ISA 428. The first difference I noticed in the MkII is the lack of analog VU meters. Both units retain the LED meters, displaying levels before the A/D converters. The result is that there is more frontpanel real estate, so the MKII has much bigger knobs for Gain, Filter and Trim on each of the four channels. The Soft Limiter has been removed, as well as the Bit Depth button. On the inside, the power supply has been switched from linear to a switched-mode supply. According to Focusrite, this allows it to be plugged into most mains power supplies around the world without changing a voltage selector or fuse. This not only reduces the weight of the MKII but also (thankfully), lowers the operating temp as the original can run quite hot. In Use Certainly, the cosmetics of the unit are a bit different, but how about the sound? To test this, I took both ISA 428s to my good friend Vincent Miraglias stu-
www.proaudioreview.com
29
dio. Miraglia, aside from being an electronic design engineer, is also a talented drummer who records a lot of TV cues with me. Our first step was to install the optional digital card; this 192 kHz, 8-channel card features Burr-Brown pro audio amps, PCM4220 A/D converter chips, a 25-pin D-Sub connector (for DAW users, etc.), two ADAT Lightpipe outputs, choice of one- or two-wire and AES or S/PDIF buttons and Word Clock I/O. Popping the top, we noticed the nice Lundahl LL1538 transformers staring up at us; the MkII uses the same Lundahl transformers and input signal path as the original. The design inside was clean and neat; the digital card install took just a few minutes. Holding down any front button on startup digitally initializes the unit; this only has to be done once. Next, we set the ISA 428s together and plugged an optical cable into an Avid Pro Tools 9 rig. We began with the original ISA 428. For drum tracks, we ran a pair of omni Earthworks SRO mics into channels 1 and 2 as overheads. On channel 3, we placed a Shure Beta 52 on the kick; on channel 4, we placed a Miktek C7 as a mono room mic. We then ran through each of the impedances and recorded the same basic drum pattern. It was the clean, clear sound that I know so well.
Then we plugged in the MkII using the same mic configuration and recorded in the same sequence of impedances; High (6.8K), Med (2.4K), ISA 110 (1.4K) and Low (600). While this was non-scientific (as his playing would understandably change a bit with each pass), we both heard little, if any, difference between the two units. OK, Focusrite wasnt lying: these units would sound the same to our ears. We were more impressed with the different impedances and the effect they had on each mic. The High impedance had the most open sound, with additional top end and clarity. The Medium setting had slightly
very small knobs for Input Gain and Trim and is definitely harder to tweak. Also, I like to ride gain on sessions (especially with vocalists) but it was something I could not do with my original. With the MkII, that would no longer be a problem. However, I do feel that the knobs were tighter on the original; they dont feel as solid on the MkIIs. Taking the MkII back home to my studio, I used it on several acoustic sessions (hear webclips 2 and 3); the results were again what I expected (in a good way): crisp, clean sound with a responsive attack. On guitarist/vocalist Dave Murphy, I used all four channels of the preamp, running a Miktek C7 (at medium impedance) on the body of his Martin 000-18NB; a beyer M120 ribbon (at low impedance) also on the body; and an Earthworks QTC1 (at high impedance) on the neck. From a K&K Pure Western mini pickup, I ran his Sarno Steel
proaudioreview.com/ focusriteisa428mkii
less top, and Low was almost muted (Low seems to work best with some ribbons). But the ISA 110 setting really knocked us both out. It was punchy and thick, almost like good analog tape. Placing a UA 1176 across the room mic and going for the Bonham thing was just slamming (hear it on webclip 1). But on the high-impedance pass, the 1176 grabbed the extra top end of the hi-hats and cymbals and made it almost brittle. The ISA 110 setting came across much smoother and sat better in the mix. I find the MkII, like the original, to be transparent for the most part, but the various impedances can add color. Regarding setting levels, on the first test with the original unit, I was glad to have the VU meters to get me in the ballpark. With the MkII, I thought I would miss them. Yet without a doubt, it was much easier and faster to set levels with the MkII simply because the knobs are so much bigger and laid out better. The original has
Guitar Black Box DI into the Hi-Z 1/4-inch input on the front of the MkII. Wow! The whole package sounded rich and full, pulling a lot of bass out of a small-bodied Martin. We overdubbed vocal with the C7, then sat back and enjoyed the sounds. Summary Just as I liked the original, I like the Focusrite ISA 428 MkII a lot. It features the same Lundahl transformers, is easier to use, sounds great, and delivers the goods as advertised. I do feel the digital option is very useful for DAW users, and to have this entire package with all the I/O for around 2k (street) is an excellent value. Oh, and I didnt miss the VUs. Price: $1,899 and $624, list (ISA 428 MkII and ISA 8CH A/D card, respectively) Contact: Focusrite | focusrite.com/us U.S. distributor: American Music & Sound | 800-431-2609 | americanmusicandsound.com
Rich Tozzoli is a composer, engineer/mixer and the software editor for Pro Audio Review. richtozzoli.com
30 ProAudioReview | March 2011 www.proaudioreview.com
studio review
by Rich Tozzoli
Rich Tozzoli is a composer, engineer/mixer and the software editor for Pro Audio Review. richtozzoli.com
32 ProAudioReview | March 2011 www.proaudioreview.com
studio review
by Rob Tavaglione
proaudioreview.com/evre320
and sculpted mids from the RE320 is notable, while the Beta 91 offers pronounced top. On loud electric guitar, the RE320 does a fine job; it offers more bottom than a SM57, less high-mids and more muscle through the low mids. High SPL is no problem for the RE320 and, to my ears, it seems more faithful than colored in direct comparison to the SM57. Where one might normally use a Sennheiser MD 421 on guitar, the RE320 will excel with more flatness and more excitement. Understandably, the kick drum filter was all wrong on this app, as it removed precious tone. For a broadcasting applications test, I pulled in the big guns. With the help of onair personality Divakar Shukla and station engineer Dave Mitchell, we ran the RE320 through a gamut of broadcast tests at the 100 kW WEND FM in Charlotte. The RE320 and an RE20 were placed three inches apart and three inches from Divakar: in an equilateral triangle, directly on-axis, with no
defined thwack. The venues FOH engineer said he liked it, as it offered more highs than a Beta 52. Onstage, the monitors loved it; my biamped monitor rig there is huge, and the RE320s absence of flab way down low made for the tightest, punchiest onstage kick that I can recall. In the studio, I found the RE320 to have a sonic signature best suited for rock recording, where higher-end note definition is arguably as crucial as thump and the fundamental. In order to create audio clips for my evaluation (and for PARs valued readers), I placed the RE320 inside a 22-inch Pork Pie kick drum (with damping rings on heads, but no pillows or blankets inside), but obviously no other mic could fit through the resonant heads small hole. I did sneak in a Shure Beta 91 (also a favorite for rock kick), placing it in the bottom center of the drum, for less than coincident, but very usable, placement. In webclips 1A and 1B, the additional bottom
pop filters employed. Technically well as webclips 5A (RE320 with improper (as most announcfilter) and 5B (RE27). Divakar ers angle themselves across the even says of the RE320, Thats mic head, preventing plosives the way Im supposed to sound. and excessive mouth noise), this placement was required for Summary accuracy in evaluation; some Assuming you like the popping Ps may also be inforRE20, you cant go wrong with mative about the mics plosive the RE320 at $299 street. Its performances. additional bottom end seems We found the RE320 to have a useful on both kick and VOs; little more bottom than a RE20, its top end is just as smooth with some scooping at 300 to and broadcast-worthy as the 800 Hz and nearly the same top RE20; its Variable D proximend (RE320 and RE20, webclips ity effect control is tuned just 2A and 2B, respectively). Divakar Divakar Shukla of Charlottes WEND 106.5 FM evaluates the new RE320 right; and the RE320 can hanand Dave loved the RE320 and alongside the original RE20. dle all the abuse of rock n roll. became further enthused when Throw in its eminently useful they heard the RE320 with the kick filter output than the RE20 or RE320), the RE20 mid-scoop filter (that is equally at home engaged (webclip 3A) in direct comparison has less top end and flatter mids; the RE320 on kick and voice) and it seems the to the RE20 (webclip 3B). Both commented sounded a lot like a RE27, at least with its RE320 is a black beauty of a RE20, with how the RE320 with filter sounded more kick filter engaged. Nonetheless, Divakar lots more versatility and nary a negative. finished, as if we had our usual processing and Dave still ultimately preferred the turned on, they said. [These webclips are RE320 with kick filter over the RE27, citing Price: $499 list unprocessed Ed.] its fullness and warmth, further revealed Contact: Electro-Voice | 800-392-3497 | Compared to the RE27 (with a hotter in webclips 4A (RE320) and 4B (RE27) as electrovoice.com
PHOTO: ROB TAVAGLIONE
36
www.proaudioreview.com
geared up
by Steve Harvey
RealTraps bass traps include a thin membrane behind the front fabric that does two things, Winer offers. It increases the bass absorption quite a bit compared to plain rigid fiberglass or foam. It also is semireflective at mid and high frequencies. You can put a whole pile of them in the room to really improve the low-frequency response without making the room totally dead, as happens with a whole room of foam or fiberglass. RealTraps Diffusor panels also act as bass traps but additionally scatter mid and high frequencies. When positioned on the rear wall (both Near and Far versions are available) they reduce comb filtering for a more focused image. That solves the longstanding dilemma, Should I do bass traps on my back wall or diffusors? Well, you can have both, says Winer. As Winer observes, People say, My room sounds terrible, but I dont want to
Brian Lucey of Magic Garden Mastering appears to work fast. when they think they know what they want. So we always prefer to talk to people. Winer explains, Bass traps work best in the corner. He points out, There are 12 corners in a rectangular room: not just where two walls meet, but also where a wall meets the floor and the ceiling. treat it because Im going to move in a year. These are great because you can take them with you, just like you would your speakers or any outboard gear. Contacts: Magic Garden Mastering | magicgardenmastering.com RealTraps | realtraps.com
Steve Harvey is the West Coast editor for PARs sister publicaiton, Pro Sound News.
38 ProAudioReview | March 2011 www.proaudioreview.com
40
www.proaudioreview.com
www.proaudioreview.com
41
42
www.proaudioreview.com
44
www.proaudioreview.com
46
www.proaudioreview.com
live review
by Strother Bullins
where in the signal chain: equipment inputs or outputs (amps, preamps, DIs, various analog outboard, etc.), or via connecting two XLRs cables with the IL-19 between. The IL-19 is a most valuable player in live-sound settings, especially in the harshest of environments: club-level gigging, where power is often dirty, and house gear (especially amplifiers) is borderline unusable. In my first application of the IL-19, I popped it in between a mono FOH mix output and an onstage (house) amplifier input, dramatically reducing a hum problem to a comparatively nonexistent level. In another live application, I inserted the IL-19 directly into a bass heads XLR line output, which was headed for FOH (originally generating a certain pesky, low-frequency hum). Voil like that, it was almost gone. At FOH, I also employed the IL-19 directly into the consoles microphone preamp inputs on several vocal microphones, all of which benefitted, at least slightly, with a lower noise floor and/or reduced hum, the cause of which was likely the very long cable (multichannel snake) run. In recording applications, the IL-19 was
also useful, if not as dramatic in its clean up jobs. In recording DI via an intermittently buzzy bass guitar (an early 80s U.S. Fender Bullet Deluxe, which has passive pickups) I inserted the IL-19 between the chains Radial Pro DIs XLR output and a FMR Audio PBC-6A compressor, to tape. No joke, the signal went from I cant record that bass to that works. What was ultimately the problem? Im still not sure, but the IL-19 was my solution. Further, any change in tone that the IL-19 presents is negligible, in my opinion; if it does affect the sound of the signal, its so slight that youd have to be an audiophiletype user to care. Granted, the IL-19 is more of a Fighter than an Eliminator I applied it to a few hum/noise problems that it just couldnt wrangle to an acceptable level. Yet considering its size, flexibility and cost, I was genuinely surprised by how often it was able to improve the lacking or even use the unusable. For that reason, the IL-19 is now my favorite little fighter. Price: $49.95 list Contact: Sescom | sescom.com
Strother Bullins is the reviews and features editor for Pro Audio Review.
48 ProAudioReview | March 2011 www.proaudioreview.com
classifieds
ACOUSTICS AUDIO EQUIPMENT
FREE!
TO ADVERTISE
Contact: Contessa Abono 650-238-0296 cabono@nbmedia.com Get the latest news and information online at
WWW.PROAUDIOREVIEW.COM
www.nbmedia.com
adindex
9 16 11 8 51 2 45 43 17 19 15 7 31 47 21 Abu Dhabi Acoustics First ADAM Audio Aphex Audio Plus Services Audio-Technica U.S. B&H Pro Audio Behringer Electro-Voice Fingerprint Audio GC Pro Genelec Harman/AKG InfoComm 2011 MiPro twofour54.com acousticsfirst.com adam-audio.com aphex.com audioplusservices.com audio-technica.com bhproaudio.com 39 behringer.com 5 electrovoice.com fingerprintaudio.com gcpro.com genelec.com akg.com infocommshow.org mipro.com.tw 12-13 18 22-23 35 3 27 Solid State Logic Sweetwave Audio Vintage King Xilica Audio Design Yamaha Commercial Audio Systems Yamaha Corporation of America solidstatelogic.com sweetwaveaudio.com vintageking.com xilica.com yamahaca.com yamaha.com/livesound Shure shure.com Renkus-Heinz renkus-heinz.com 37 14 6,35 33 52 6,35 Peavey Phonic Primacoustic Prism Media Products QSC Audio Products Radial Engineering peavey.com/products/ipr phonic.com primacoustic.com sadie.com qscaudio.com radialeng.com
www.proaudioreview.com
49
bench test
PAR Bench Test:
by Frank Wells
10.00000 1.00000
Sescom IL-19
Sescoms IL-19 inline isolator is passive and transformer-based, in a nonconductive housing, with no common ground from input to output XLR connectors. The frequency response is relatively flat, within 0.8 dB from 100 Hz to 20 kHz and within 1.8 dB from 20 Hz to 20 kHz, the LF roll-off somewhat indicative of the physical limitations of a transformer that can fit inside even a slightly bloated inline shell. THD+N (Total Harmonic Distortion + Noise) performance at 1 kHz is a respectable .02 percent with a nominal +4 dBu input. LF distortion, again a factor of the transformer size, will be more noticeable. THD+N at 100 Hz with a +4 dBu input is .3 percent, and near 10 percent with a +22 dBu input. The square wave response is also decent. In short, the Sescom IL-19 will perform as advertised, effectively isolating connected circuits and breaking ground loops. LF signals can be significantly colored (though some might say it adds that transformer warmth). For voice in particular, and with the proclivity for ground related issues in spoken-word sound reinforcement situations, the IL-19 could be an event-saving device. For musical applications, let your ears be your guide.
0.10000
0.01000
0.00100
0.00010
THD+N vs Level, -30 dBu input swept to +22 dBu input. Top trace (green) is 100 Hz. Bottom trace (red) is 1 kHz.
dBr 2.00
0.00
-2.00
-4.00
-6.00
-8.00
2.00 Hz
10.00
100.00
1000.00
10000.00
40000.00