Professional Documents
Culture Documents
o
1
1 2 I = k
(3)
If the transformer is well manufactured, it is sufficient to
select 9 . 0 = to obtain a reasonable oversizing margin.
It is now possible to solve (3) for the lower and upper duty
cycle bounds, respectively 5 . 0
min
= o and 8 . 0
max
= o ,
solving the equations system next stated:
( )
( )
I >
I s
o
1
1 2
1
1 2
max max
min min
k
k
(4)
These inequality can be represented as in the next figure:
Fig. 5 Turns ratio for maximum and minimum duty cycles
where all the solutions lies in the highlighted area of the
graph. The solution range, at the moment, is extremely wide;
since it depends on the maximum and minimum duty cycle
value, as evident in Fig. 5, is possible to reduce the area by
considering only the optimal operative points. In fact, for a
boost full bridge converter operating in boost mode, the
efficiency in terms of amount of electrical power available at
the high-voltage terminals is non-linearly related to the duty
cycle, and beyond a critical value it collapses. A typical
efficiency graph for the outlined topology is next reported:
Fig. 6 Efficiency of boost full bridge converter in Boost mode
measured on the prototype realized with k=6
For this reason 6 . 0
min_
=
opt
o and 77 . 0
max_
=
opt
o are
selected as new duty cycle range. Note that the reference
graph in Fig. 6 will be justified and replaced by a set of
experimental measurements in the last section of this paper.
Consequently, the equation set (4) can be solved obtaining the
following results:
>
s
14 . 7
63 . 7
k
k
(5)
B) Buck mode
It is possible to repeat the same steps of Boost mode to obtain
the inequalities system as in (5). For step-down mode, the
relationship between input and output voltage with respect to
the duty cycle is:
o 2
k
V
V
i
o
= (6)
For Buck case, the output voltage range is [27,30] V and the
input is [260,280] V. Rewriting (6) in a more convenient
form:
o I = 2 k (7)
where | | 4 . 10 6 . 8 e = I
o
i
V
V
.
Exactly as in the following paragraph, selecting 1 . 1 = a
reasonable oversizing margin is guaranteed. Again, the turns
ratio formula is rewritten as:
Efficiency vs. duty cycle
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
0,74 0,75 0,76 0,77 0,78
41
o I = 2 k (8)
A graph similar to Fig. 5 can be derived from relation (8), and
is next reported:
2 4 6 8 10 12
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
I
k
o
min
o
MAX
Fig. 7 Turns ratio for maximum and minimum duty cycles
The turns ratio is now directly proportional to the duty cycle;
the inequalities system to be considered follows:
I s
I >
o
o
max max
min min
2
2
k
k
(9)
Also for Buck mode it is possible to consider an optimal duty
range to maximize the efficiency; typical values for the
outlined converter topology are 35 . 0
min_
=
opt
o and
48 . 0
max_
=
opt
o . Then the system (9) is solved as follows:
s
>
08 . 11
68 . 6
k
k
(10)
Comparing (5) and (10), the overlapping of the sustainable
values for k parameter in both modes is evident, leading to (5)
as the unique solution for the turns ratio selection problem.
Following the outlined approach, a turns ratio of 5 . 7 = k
has been selected for the equipment under study.
IV. KEY POINTS ON OPTIMAL TURNS RATIO SELECTION
The preliminary study phase of Sec. III has led to relation
(5) and (10), and following to the selection of 7.5 as an
optimal turns ratio for the converter under study. These
results have to be confirmed and refined with a further phase,
taking into account also the experimental results. The
efficiency depends on the transformer power losses, which
can vary due to the modulation frequency. In fact, is well
known that exists a frequency range where the transformer
magnetic core behavior is more efficient in terms of heat
losses. The considerations of Sec. III about the optimal duty
cycle range can be confirmed (or refined) by simulations and
further calculations, taking into account the frequency effect
on the transformer conversion process.
Furthermore, the switching elements in both full bridges of
the converter are not ideal. In particular, the power losses
linked to these elements will decrease the overall efficiency,
and it is possible to find a direct relationship with the duty
cycle. Considering together this new equation and the already
obtained, the duty cycle optimal range can be refined and the
optimal turns ratio updated.
V. SIMULATIONS AND EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS
Once selected an optimal turn ratio k, simulations and
measurements on the real equipment have to be performed in
order to validate the selection strategy. A dedicated
transformer has been realized for the application. In order to
reduce iron losses, ferrite cores without air-gap have been
used; incidentally, note that a ferrite core is characterized by a
maximum value of magnetic induction before saturation. The
ferrite material, the core size, the number of turns, and the
switching frequency were chosen so that the transformer is
able to work within its linear region, at any operative
conditions.
Fig. 8 Prototype of a 3 kW single cell
Each cell has been tested at full power in both modes (step
up/down). The next figure shows the voltage across the
primary and secondary of the transformer, and the current
ripple in the boost inductor of a module.
-5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 5
x 10
-5
-500
-250
0
250
500
V
H
[
V
]
-5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 5
x 10
-5
-100
-50
0
50
100
V
L
[
V
]
-5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 5
x 10
-5
-20
0
20
M 10 s
c
u
r
r
e
n
t
r
i
p
p
l
e
[
A
]
Fig. 9 Measured waveform under step-up mode operation with
V
L
=20V, V
O
=270V, P=3kW, k=7.5
42
Two different prototypes of transformer have been tested,
(k=6, 7.5) and several test critical conditions (i.e. maximum
output voltage required vs. minimum input voltage available)
have been planned .Experimental results show that in step-up
mode efficiency of the module drops down when k=6, due to
the high value of the duty cycle and consequent high losses of
the switches. In step-down mode, both prototypes show an
elevate efficiency value, so the best choice between the turns
ratio hypothesis is k=7.5; the next figure shows the correct
response of the converter in boost mode, under different
loads, where the transduced input current (61 A/V) is reported
in yellow, in blue is the HV output voltage and in magenta
the LV input voltage is shown.
.
Fig. 10 Final test of the converter in boost mode, with different
steps of load (1/3, 2/3, full power).
VI. CONCLUSION
An optimal selection procedure has been discussed, in order
to calculate a correct turn ratio of a transformer involved in
boost/full bridge bidirectional converters realization. The
results have been first validated in a simulative environment,
and successively during a second testing phase, where a real
hardware equipment has been adopted to show the
compliance between simulative results and real
measurements. Both tests confirm the correct choice of the
turn ratio.
Due to the increasing interest of the scientific community
about even more specific converters, in order to manage bi-
directional power flows, the need of a methodical approach
for transformers turns ratio selection arises.
For this reason, it is important to evidence that, without loss
of generality, it is possible to repeat the same steps for
optimal turns ratio selection referring to a generic DC/DC
isolated full bridge converter, starting from the requirements
and taking into account its constitutive relationships.
VII. REFERENCES
[1] Siri K., Willhoff M.A., Uniform Current/Voltage-Sharing for
Interconnected DC-DC Converters, Proc. 2007 IEEE Aerospace
Conference, Piscataway (NJ), March 2007, pp. 1-17.
[2] Q. Zhao, F. C. Lee, High-efficiency, high step-up dc-dc converters,
IEEE Trans. Power Electron., vol. 18, no.1, pp. 65-73, Jan 2003.
[3] X. Jiang, X. Wen, H. Xu , Study on Isolated Full Bridge Converter in
FCEV, Proc. 7th International Power Engineering Conference,
Singapore (Ch), Dec. 2005, Vol.2, pp. 827-830
[4] MIL-STD-704F, Dpt. Of Defense Interface standard, 2004.
[5] ABD0100.1.8, AIRBUS standard, 2002
[6] D.J. Perreault, J.G. Kassakian, Distributed Interleaving of Paralleled
Power Converters, IEEE Trans. On Circuits and Systems, Vol. 44, No.
8, pp. 728734, 1997.
[7] N. Mohan, T. Undeland, W. Robbins, Power Electronics - Converters,
Applications and Design, Second Ed., John Wiley & Sons, New York,
1995.
43