Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Instructor Guide
Copyright Information
Instructor Guide
First Edition 2008. Revised: September 2008 v. 5.13.09 Printed in the United States of America The safety statements, procedures, and guidelines contained in this guide are current as of the publication date. Prior to using the safety statements, procedures, and guidelines contained in the guide, it is advised that you confirm the currency of these statements, procedures, and guidelines with the appropriate controlling authorities. The development of this training program was supported by a grant awarded to the International Association of Fire Chiefs (IAFC) by the United States Department of Transportation (USDOT). The IAFC wishes to thank the USDOT for its ongoing commitment to the health and safety of hazardous materials first responders. Pictures on the cover are the property of the Texas Engineering Extension Service/Emergency Services Training Institute (TEEX/ESTI).
Table of Contents
Module 0: Introduction ................................................................................................................... 1 Course Goal ................................................................................................................................. 1 National Hazardous Materials Fusion Center ............................................................................. 1 Conducting National Hazardous Materials Fusion Center Training Courses .......................... 2 Administrative Information ........................................................................................................ 2 Module 1: The Incident ................................................................................................................... 3 Initial Dispatch Information ........................................................................................................ 3 Initial Incident Size Up ................................................................................................................ 4 Additional Scene Information ..................................................................................................... 5 Module 2: Incident Response ......................................................................................................... 7 Response Narrative ..................................................................................................................... 7 Hazardous Material Behavior ................................................................................................... 12 Incident Response ..................................................................................................................... 13 Module 3: Lessons Learned .......................................................................................................... 15 Lessons Learned ........................................................................................................................ 15 Best Practices ............................................................................................................................ 17 Response Considerations .......................................................................................................... 18 Hazardous Material Information .............................................................................................. 21 Chlorine Gas .......................................................................................................................... 21
i Course Goal | International Association of Fire Chiefs (IAFC) Instructor Guide
ii
Module 0: Introduction
Module Time: 510 minutes
Course Goal
This training course is designed to enhance Hazardous Materials (HazMat) responder safety and improve decision making for the prevention and mitigation of HazMat incidents. This course has been developed as part of the National Hazardous Materials Fusion Center.
Regional Incident Survey Teams (RIST) gather the information for the Fusion Center. RISTs are composed of individuals from around the country who are skilled and experienced in HazMat response or experienced in the HazMat industry. RIST members will be part of a team invited by a local jurisdiction or state authority to respond to significant HazMat incidents for information
1 Course Goal | International Association of Fire Chiefs (IAFC) Instructor Guide
gathering. The information will be analyzed in order to develop safe HazMat response techniques, lessons learned, and best practices that will be shared with HazMat teams and emergency responders. In no case will the data be used to criticize or condemn response actions. For more information on the Fusion Center visit: http://www.hazmatfc.com/ Or send an e-mail: hazmatfusion@iafc.org Conducting National Hazardous Materials Fusion Center Training Courses All of the information contained in this course is from an actual HazMat event. A RIST gathered all the information. This training activity can be conducted using a large class discussion or by dividing the participants into three to four small groups. The benefit of using small groups is to allow greater participant interaction and to draw out differences in opinion for discussion. The instructor should decide which method will work best for the number and type of participants in the class. This course is designed to be taught as it is in approximately 2 hours; however we encourage you to use this in a manner that best suits your training needs. For example, this material can be covered and expanded on in a single, longer session or over the course of several training sessions.
Administrative Information
Before conducting the class ensure that participants know the location of exits and any emergency procedures unique to the training area. Remind participants that this information is presented to enhance future response efforts and is not to be used to criticize or condemn response actions contained herein.
Chlorine Release National Hazardous Materials Fusion Center Module 1: The Incident
A work crew is doing boring operations nearby to lay fiber optic cable, hit something hard, and began to smell a chemical odor The location is a busy strip shopping center near a very heavily travelled intersection on a weekday afternoon. The engine company is staffed with two firefighters who were dispatched to the scene at 1814 hours. One of the firefighters is trained to the Hazardous Materials (HazMat) technician level and works part time for a regional HazMat response team.
Initial Dispatch Information | International Association of Fire Chiefs (IAFC) Instructor Guide
Chlorine Release National Hazardous Materials Fusion Center Module 1: The Incident
Initial reports and information 4. Ask, what (if any) type of hazardous material might be present. 5. Ask, if a hazardous material is present at this time what type of preparations would these responders most likely be making?
This is the scene as the original responders found it upon their initial arrival and before any actions took place. Initial reports from witnesses reported the boring machine hitting something hard shortly into the bore. The impact was hard enough to shake the ground and stall the machine. Shortly afterwards a strong odor of chlorine was detected. The odor of chlorine was evident in the area; however, the responding firefighters could not locate the source. The boring crew believed they hit a chlorine pipeline. No such pipeline existed in the area. One of the initial responders reported finding a propane cylinder behind a privacy wall at a nearby shopping center.
Initial Incident Size Up | International Association of Fire Chiefs (IAFC) Instructor Guide
Chlorine Release National Hazardous Materials Fusion Center Module 1: The Incident
Conditions: o Summer afternoon o Clear to partly cloudy skies o 98F, 75 percent relative humidity o Wind SE at 35 miles per hour o Flat terrain o Moderate sunlight
Instructor Note:
1. Ask participants if this additional information changes the scene. 2. If so, how and why?
Additional Scene Information | International Association of Fire Chiefs (IAFC) Instructor Guide
Chlorine Release National Hazardous Materials Fusion Center Module 1: The Incident
Additional Scene Information | International Association of Fire Chiefs (IAFC) Instructor Guide
Chlorine Release National Hazardous Materials Fusion Center Module 2: Incident Response
Response Narrative
Instructor Note:
1. Allow participants time to read the narrative of the response. 2. After participants have read the narrative, conduct a discussion based on the items in the Hazardous Materials Behavior and Incident Response sections. The Hazardous Materials Behavior section focuses on the hazardous material itself, while the Incident Response section focuses on responders, strategies, and tactics. 3. The PowerPoint slides for this module contain all of the pictures that go along with the narrative. After participants have read the narrative you should show each of the slides so they can see the pictures in greater detail and discuss any elements of interest in more depth.
This is the full account of the response narrative compiled from the Regional Incident Survey Team (RIST) interviews of the responders involved. On a mid-summer afternoon, a construction crew was laying fiber optic cable with a boring machine. The local site conditions were as follows: clear to partly cloudy skies, 98F, 75 percent relative humidity, and wind SE at 35 miles per hour. During the boring operation, the crew hit something hard and continued to bore through it. Almost immediately the crew detected a chemical odor and alerted authorities. At 1814 hours, 9-1-1 was contacted, who in turn dispatched an engine company from a local Volunteer Fire Department (VFD) to a gas leak. An engine company staffed with two firefighters arrived on scene and assumed command. One of the firefighters was trained to the Hazardous Materials (HazMat) technician level and worked part time for a regional HazMat response team. Initial reports from witnesses reported the boring machine hitting something hard shortly into the bore. The impact was hard enough to shake the ground and stall the machine. Shortly afterwards a strong odor of chlorine was
7 Response Narrative | International Association of Fire Chiefs (IAFC) Instructor Guide
Chlorine Release National Hazardous Materials Fusion Center Module 2: Incident Response
detected. The odor of chlorine was evident in the area; however, the responding firefighters could not locate the source. The boring crew believed they hit a chlorine pipeline. No such pipeline existed in the area. One of the initial responders mistakenly reported finding a propane cylinder behind a privacy wall at a nearby shopping center. After further investigation, it was determined that the suspected propane cylinder was in fact an abandoned chlorine cylinder. This changed the entire complexion of the incident. As it turned out, the incident of the boring machine hitting something hard and the abandoned chlorine cylinder were not related at all. The Incident Commander (IC) issued a request for a regional HazMat response team to respond to the location. At 1835 hours, the regional HazMat response team was dispatched to assist the local volunteer fire department with a chlorine leak. While en route, the HazMat team contacted the IC via cell phone who stated that an underground boring company possibly hit a Chlorine line. There was a strong odor of chlorine gas in the air, but no one could locate the source and no visible vapor cloud was present. The IC reported that one employee had been decontaminated, treated, and transported to a nearby hospital for inhalation injuries. Two more employees had also been transported by Privately Owned Vehicle (POV) prior to his arrival. Routing instructions were given to the HazMat team, however the IC failed to take the release into consideration and subsequently sent the HazMat team through the release upon their arrival. The HazMat team reported a strong odor as they passed directly downwind of the scene. The engine company officer, who was HazMat trained, was able to locate an abandoned chlorine cylinder behind a privacy wall at a nearby strip shopping center. He was able to take two pictures of the cylinder with his camera phone prior to exiting the area.
Chlorine Release National Hazardous Materials Fusion Center Module 2: Incident Response
This information proved to be very valuable to the HazMat team upon their arrival at 1910 hours. The pictures revealed a single 150-pound chlorine cylinder lying on its side next to a concrete privacy wall and behind two dumpsters. The cylinder was leaking and had severe corrosion damage to the valve assembly.
Figure 2 Cylinder with Valve Damage and Frost
There was a visible frost line on the cylinder due to the auto-refrigeration generated by the release. The accurate reconnaissance and photos taken by the engine company officer allowed the HazMat team to formulate an effective entry action plan. The local VFD, which was trained to the awareness level, was tasked to set up and staff a decontamination station and to provide two firefighters for a Rapid Intervention Team (RIT). The first responder resources were communicating on a different radio system than the HazMat team. To manage this challenge, the engine company officer and the HazMat team officer were trying to remain together for face-to-face coordination.
Chlorine Release National Hazardous Materials Fusion Center Module 2: Incident Response
The HazMat team deployed two AreaRae monitors to auto record ambient air readings in the area, and two HazMat technicians were assigned to make entry in Level A protection and 1-hour Self-Contained Breathing Apparatus (SCBA) with the mission to upright the cylinder and apply a Chlorine A Kit to stop the release.
Figure 3 Technicians in Level A Make Entry
At 1944 hours two technicians made entry with the two first responders as backup personnel. The cylinder was located and placed in an upright position. While moving the cylinder in its upright position, the amount of release increased momentarily which resulted in increased readings on the instruments. This alarmed the HazMat officer who in turn, asked for a Personnel Accountability Report (PAR) from his entry team. The entry team was unable to answer the PAR due to the fact that they were occupied with moving the cylinder to its upright position. The entry person engaged in handling the cylinder was the only individual with a working radio; the partners radio was reportedly not working for unknown reasons. The HazMat officer was considering deploying the RIT; however, shortly after completing the initial task, the entry team transmitted a PAR which was received. There was no line-of-sight supervision or monitoring of the entry members, leaving radio as the only means of conveying information and status.
10
Chlorine Release National Hazardous Materials Fusion Center Module 2: Incident Response
The entry team applied the Chlorine A Kit and reported the leak contained at 2003 hours.
Figure 4 Cylinder with Chlorine Kit A
The entry was made after nightfall and lighting consisted of flashlights held by entry members. This further complicated the task; however, due to the recent training conducted by the HazMat team specifically on the application of chlorine kits and also due to their good technique of laying out all kit components in their work area before engaging with the leaking cylinder, they were able to stop the leak with a total entry time of 19 minutes. At this time the entry team exited the area and proceeded to decontamination. Upon their arrival at decontamination, it was discovered that the decontamination area was not staffed or ready to process the entry team. The entry team had been on air for approximately 25 minutes. The decontamination crew was immediately sent to staff decontamination and completed the process without further incident. The attention was now turned to maintaining site safety and control, cleaning up the residue, identifying the responsible party, and removing the abandoned cylinder. Officials were not able to identify or locate a responsible party, so the HazMat officer issued a request for assistance from a local Chlorine Emergency Plan (CHLOREP) team. The CHLOREP leader gave guidance on how to neutralize the hydrochloric acid residue developed as a result of the chlorine liquid interacting with the moisture in the air and dispatched a two-member CHLOREP response.
11
Chlorine Release National Hazardous Materials Fusion Center Module 2: Incident Response
A second HazMat entry was mounted to go in and apply soda ash to the residue, which was accomplished without further incident.
Figure 5 Application of Soda Ash
The CHLOREP team arrived around 2330 hours and proceeded to place the damaged cylinder into a cylinder casket; however, for some unknown reason, a briefing was never held to discuss how this would be accomplished and what should be expected during this operation. It is valuable to know that in order to place a cylinder into the casket, the Chlorine A Kit must be removed. This in turn will result in another short-duration release of product. This was never conveyed to the IC or HazMat officer. As the CHLOREP team completed the task, the unanticipated release caught responders off guard. The release was of short duration and caused no injuries or impact due to good site control downwind. The casket operation was completed and the operation was drawn to a conclusion without further incident.
1. Did the hazardous material(s) involved behave as expected in this situation? Why or why not? 2. Did the hazardous material(s) and container(s) behave as predicted?
12 Hazardous Material Behavior | International Association of Fire Chiefs (IAFC) Instructor Guide
Chlorine Release National Hazardous Materials Fusion Center Module 2: Incident Response
3. Are the behaviors happening out of the predicted order? 4. Are the behaviors happening differently than anticipated? 5. What were the initial response objectives? Were they appropriate? Why or why not? 6. Was there anything else significant about the material or container involved in this incident?
Incident Response
Instructor Note:
1. Conduct a discussion based on the items in the Incident Response section. 2. This section focuses on the response efforts, so keep the discussion centered on the responders, strategies, and tactics.
1. Were the strategies and tactics appropriate? Why or why not? 2. Were there any unforeseen issues that played a part in this incident or response (weather, unexpected material behavior, bystanders)? 3. Were there any injuries to responders? If so, what were the causative factors? Could this have been avoided? If so, how? 4. Was there an impact to the environment? If so, what were the causative factors? Could this have been avoided? If so, how? 5. Was there any significant equipment damaged? If so, what were the causative factors? Could this have been avoided? If so, how? 6. Discuss the risks versus benefits in this incident.
13
Chlorine Release National Hazardous Materials Fusion Center Module 2: Incident Response
7. List any response issues related to: Response time Personnel Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) Established control zones Safety measures Mutual aid Communications Resources Decontamination
14
Chlorine Release National Hazardous Materials Fusion Center Module 3: Lessons Learned
Lessons Learned
These are the lessons learned as stated by the responders to the incident. Instructor Note:
1. Have participants read through the list of lessons learned. 2. Ask them to pick out two or three and discuss those that are unique, innovative, potentially dangerous, or most relevant to them and their jurisdictions.
It is important for the first responder to properly identify types of containers. Some containers look a lot alike and should not be identified by the color of the container. If the first responder is at all uncertain about the container he/she has responded to, that should be communicated to the Hazardous Materials (HazMat) team en route and the first responders should utilize the Emergency Response Guidebooks (ERG) Guide 111 for unknown material. The coordination with the local law enforcement is vital for the safety of the responders as well as the public at large. If at all possible set up command with a law enforcement liaison or a unified command. Communications between companies at the scene and responding specialty companies, such as the HazMat technicians, should be clear and accurate. If there are any questions to what the situation is, such as the container identification, that should be communicated to the responders so appropriate actions can be taken regarding reconnaissance and identification.
15
Chlorine Release National Hazardous Materials Fusion Center Module 3: Lessons Learned
It is important to work with surrounding jurisdictions. Mutual aid and automatic aid is becoming more accepted by most jurisdictions because they know they may need additional help. By training together, each jurisdiction can improve their capabilities as well as know the capabilities of the responding mutual aid companies. Prior to entering the hot zone, a decontamination zone must be set up and adequate personnel staged for decontamination actions. An emergency decontamination zone can be set up quickly for rescue activities, but a full decontamination zone should be set up as soon as possible. Once the emergency is controlled and a cleanup crew is called in, the jurisdiction having authority (which is usually the same jurisdiction the HazMat crew is from) needs to make sure the cleanup crew has the proper credentials to address the problem. If the HazMat crew remains on the scene, they need to know what the cleanup crews process is so they are prepared should anything happen. The crew went in for a visual reconnaissance to determine the nature of the incident and to identify the equipment needed to address the problem. The crew had recently trained with the Chlorine A Kit, so when it came time to use the equipment the personnel were familiar with the tools. This made the placement of the kit on the bottle seem like a routine evolution.
16
Chlorine Release National Hazardous Materials Fusion Center Module 3: Lessons Learned
Best Practices
These are the best practices recommended by the Regional Incident Survey Team (RIST) following analysis of the incident. Instructor Note:
1. Have participants read through the list of best practices. 2. Ask them to pick out two or three and discuss those that are unique, innovative, or most relevant to them and their jurisdictions.
The minimum level of HazMat technicians needed to conduct safe, efficient, and sustainable entry operations in Level A is generally considered to be six personnel (HazMat group supervisor, HazMat safety officer, two entry members, and two backup members). Ensure an adequate level of trained HazMat technicians is assembled at the incident through several options such as: o early request for mutual aid, o early callback of off-duty personnel, and o increased level of on-duty staffing.
Conduct a comprehensive risk versus benefit analysis following your assessment of the hazards presented. Keep in mind the priorities of life (including responders), environment, and then property. o Be cognizant of external influences that may drive your tactical planning and any adverse effect this may have on responder safety.
Level A entry requires significant supportive elements to ensure safety and efficiency, including but not limited to the following considerations: o Ensure reliable and common communications between entry team members and with their supervisor and backup team.
17 Best Practices | International Association of Fire Chiefs (IAFC) Instructor Guide
Chlorine Release National Hazardous Materials Fusion Center Module 3: Lessons Learned
o The backup team should be wearing the same level of chemical protective clothing as the entry team. A backup team is not necessarily the same thing as a Rapid Intervention Team (RIT), which typically wears a structural fire fighting protective ensemble including a Self-Contained Breathing Apparatus (SCBA). A RIT may be established in addition to, but should not be in lieu of, the backup team. o Pre- and post-entry medical monitoring should be employed. This is not limited to the concern for potential heat stress. o Maintain line-of-sight observation of the entry team, if possible. If not feasible, consider wireless video feed. o Provide hands-free illumination of the work site. This lighting should not be directed into the eyes of the entry members and is enhanced if provided by more than one source from different angles. o Confirm that decontamination is staffed and operational before entry is initiated. o Consider staffing a protective hoseline proximate to the work site, particularly if the decontamination corridor must be set up some distance away. o Site safety planning should include contingencies; the pre-entry brief should include Plan B in the event that Plan A fails. This should include escape routes and safety zones.
Response Considerations
This section contains information compiled by the RIST survey and is specific to this response. This information is designed to provide information that jurisdictions might consider for similar responses in the future.
18
Chlorine Release National Hazardous Materials Fusion Center Module 3: Lessons Learned
Instructor Note:
1. Have participants read through the list of response considerations. 2. Ask them to pick out two or three and discuss those that are most relevant to them and their jurisdictions.
If possible, lay out all components of the chlorine kit before initiating application (most feasible for 150-pound or 1-ton cylinder scenarios). Organize components in a logical order and have your partner be ready to provide the next component as you progress through the operation. Utilize positive pressure ventilation to control and/or change the atmosphere of the immediate work environment. This will help reduce concentrations of the release and the exposure to your chemical protective clothing and will improve visibility. It can also serve to direct the release in a preferred direction and prevent hazardous concentrations from accumulating in low areas (for high Vapor Density [VD] gases/vapors). Auto-refrigeration will occur during the release of chlorine. This is likely to result in a cyclic slowing or complete stoppage due to the formation of an ice patch (depending on the humidity conditions present). Some HazMat teams may assume they will never encounter a 150-pound cylinder that has not emptied before they are able to control itnot a good assumption. A Thermal Imaging Camera (TIC) is very useful: o to visualize small residual leaks and direct fine adjustments to stop them; o to visualize contents of the cylinder, revealing the liquid level remaining; and o taking a photo of the display screen provides scene documentation.
19
Chlorine Release National Hazardous Materials Fusion Center Module 3: Lessons Learned
Figure 6 Chlorine Cylinder from TIC Figure 7 Chlorine Cylinder from TIC
Cleanup companies (or assisting specialists) should be vetted in advance for proper training, procedures, and work practices. Get to know the contractors in your area, their capabilities, reputation in the industry, response time, and essential other factors. Review the work plan of any cleanup companies (or assisting specialists) prior to their commencing operations. Identify the potential for a new incident to occur resulting from their actions and either require modification to the plan or prepare to deal with the consequences should it happen. If necessary, maintain the established work zones and controlled access points until the potential of subsequent releases or other consequences has passed. If chemical protective clothing is exposed to liquefied chlorine, this exceeds the test criterion for certification (gaseous chlorine); degraded performance may occur earlier than expected. Training is the key component to any successful tactical operational undertaking.
20
Chlorine Release National Hazardous Materials Fusion Center Module 3: Lessons Learned
21
Hazardous Material Information | International Association of Fire Chiefs (IAFC) Instructor Guide
Chlorine Release National Hazardous Materials Fusion Center Module 3: Lessons Learned
22
Hazardous Material Information | International Association of Fire Chiefs (IAFC) Instructor Guide
Chlorine Release National Hazardous Materials Fusion Center Module 4: Moving Forward/Planning Ahead
Planning Activity
Instructor Note:
1. The planning worksheet is designed to take the information the participants have discussed about the specific Hazardous Materials (HazMat) incident and allow them to think of ways to incorporate knowledge and lessons learned in terms of their own jurisdiction and response efforts. 2. Try to have participants focus on what they have learned from this incident and how they might respond in similar incidents. 3. Some of the areas below might not be applicable in all cases. 4. Allow the participants about 15 minutes to make notes on the worksheet either individually or in their groups. 5. Call time and hold a class discussion covering the items on the worksheet.
23
Chlorine Release National Hazardous Materials Fusion Center Module 4: Moving Forward/Planning Ahead
24
Chlorine Release National Hazardous Materials Fusion Center Module 4: Moving Forward/Planning Ahead
Planning Worksheet How can we incorporate what we have learned from this specific Hazardous Materials (HazMat) incident to improve our future responses? In particular the areas of: Surveying the incident: ___________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________ Container identification/markings: _________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________ Monitoring equipment: __________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________
25
Chlorine Release National Hazardous Materials Fusion Center Module 4: Moving Forward/Planning Ahead
Response objectives: ____________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________ Incident command: ______________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________ Communication: ________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________ Personal Protective Equipment (PPE): _______________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________
26 Planning Activity | International Association of Fire Chiefs (IAFC) Instructor Guide
Chlorine Release National Hazardous Materials Fusion Center Module 4: Moving Forward/Planning Ahead
Decontamination: _______________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________ Policies and procedures: _________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________ Mutual aid: ____________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________ Training: ______________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________
27 Planning Activity | International Association of Fire Chiefs (IAFC) Instructor Guide
Chlorine Release National Hazardous Materials Fusion Center Module 4: Moving Forward/Planning Ahead
Resources: ____________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________ Risk versus benefit analysis: _______________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________ What are some best practices we can take away from this incident? ______________________ ______________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________
28