What I just showed you on youtube was a video of the Tridentine Mass.

Which is the
Catholic mass.

“Patriarchs, archbishops, and other hierarchs should zealously care for the faithful
protection and the accurate observance of their rite, nor are they to permit or to tolerate
any change in the rite.” Canon 1 paragraph 1 of the Oriental Code of Canon Law. On
June 2, 1957 in the fullness of his Apostolic Authority, Pope Pius XII extended this law
to the Universal Church.

The first picture I am going to show is the missal of Vatican II

 This second picture is the inside of the book according to Vatican II

We are specifically looking for the consecration form which I provided below.
This is the consecration form in which Vatican II uses.

However this is not the form in which the Church has always used.

Holy Office warning, 24 July 1958: “This Supreme Sacred Congregation has learned
that in a certain translation of the New Order of Holy Week into the vernacular, the
words "mysterium fidei" in the form of the consecration of the chalice are omitted. it is
also reported that some priests omit these words in the very celebration of Mass.
Therefore this Supreme Congregation gives warning that it is impious to introduce a
change in so sacred a matter and to mutilate or alter editions of liturgical books. (See
Canon 1399, paragraph 10) Bishops therefore, in accordance with the warning of the
Holy Office or 14 February, 1958, should see to it that the prescriptions of the sacred
canons on divine worship be strictly observed, and they should be closely watchful that
no one dare to introduce even the slightest change in the matter and form of the
Sacraments.”
This is the Latin Translation into English from the above picture....

De Defectibus Decree of the Council of Trent

Chapter II
Defective Formula
1. DEFECTS may arise in respect of the formula, if anything is wanting to complete the
actual words of consecration. The words of consecration, which are the formative
principle of this Sacrament, are as follows: Hoc est enim Corpus meum; and: Ric est
enim calix Sanguinis mei, novi et aeterni testamenti; mysterium fidei, qui pro vobis et
pro multis effundetur in remissionem peccatorum. If any omission or alteration is
made in the formula of consecration of the Body and Blood, involving a change of
meaning, the consecration is invalid. An addition made without altering the meaning
does not invalidate the consecration, but the Celebrant commits a mortal sin.

2. If the Celebrant cannot remember whether he has said the usual words of
consecration, he is not on that account to be disturbed. But if he knows for certain that
he has omitted something essential to the Sacrament, i.e. the formula of consecration, or
part of it, he must repeat the formula, and go on with the Mass from that point. If he is
doubtful, and yet thinks that very probably he has omitted something essential, he
should repeat the formula conditionally, though the condition need not be expressed. But
if it was something inessential, he need not repeat it, but should go on with the Mass.

Let us then look at what we had originally...

Let us look for the consecration form of the Blood of Our Lord. See the next picture.
Now let us compare the two.

Here is Vatican II consecration form (1962)

Here is the Catholic form (1957)

Vatican II form states: “For all men so that sins may be forgiven.”

The Catholic form states: “For many unto the forgiveness of sins.”

Vatican II states, that our “sins may be forgiven.”

Is that not noticeably different from “the forgiveness of sins.”?

In the Vatican II form, we can only hope that our sins are forgiven, but that is not a
guarantee that they are forgiven.

Whereas in the Catholic form it states “unto the forgiveness of sins.” In the Catholic
form it guarantees us of the forgiveness of sins.
In addition, in the Vatican II form it states that “for all men” while in the Catholic form
it states in “for many.”

In the bible it states “for many,” “For this is my blood of the new testament, which shall
be shed for many unto remission of sins.” Matthew 26:28

This change from “for many” to “for all” is a substantial change. It even contradicts the
Holy Bible.

“If any omission or alteration is made in the formula of consecration of the Body
and Blood, involving a change of meaning, the consecration is invalid.” - De
Defectibus Decree of the Council of Trent

Therefore we can logically conclude that the Vatican II rite is invalid. If the rite is
invalid, then the Novus Ordo Mass is invalid, for it was changed substantially.
Every time you go up to receive communion you are not receiving the Body and Blood
of Our Lord Jesus Christ, but just bread and wine. You commit a mortal sin and a
sacrilege, for according to the Vatican II rite, as I have shown you, is invalid and does
not change the bread to the body of Jesus Christ nor does it change the wine into the
blood of Jesus Christ. You are worshiping bread as though it were God, and you would
transgress the first Commandment by choosing to believe that piece of bread is God,
despite knowing the consecration form is invalid. “I am the Lord, and there is none else:
there is no God, besides me.” (Isaias 45:5)

Below is further proof that they purposely changed the rite at Vatican II. They had the
intention all along to change the rite. Which can only make one think, “An enemy hath
done this.” (Matthew 13:28)