Risk Assessment Report in Majingklak and Ciawitali Sub-Village, Pamotan Village Ciamis District, Jawa Barat Province

Report on Rapid Risk Assessment
In Majingklak and Ciawitali sub-village, Pamotan Village Ciamis District, Jawa Barat Province
Prepared by: Renee Picasso Manoppo Kustiwa Adinata Verdinand Gedoan Ferry Irianto Agustus 2011 Project number : K-IDN-1104-0001 Project Name : Lighthouse Project Phase II
Report on Rapid Risk Assessment in Majingklak and Ciawitali Sub-villages, Pamotan Village Ciamis Distric
Preface
This Rapid Assessment Report was prepared as a realization of the writers accountability to the community that have been involved in the risk assessment activities. This report was prepared based on the data gathered by the enumerator team in Majingklak and Ciawitali sub-villages. We would also like to express our appreciation and gratitude to Mr. Leonardo Ratuwalangon, Head of Office DKH Project Office Indonesia for his input, critical comments, and suggestions during the implementation of risk assessment and completion of this report. Our thanks are also due to the enumerator team: Juman, Muhidin, Asri, Supin, Tugino, Slamet, and Warno, who have made accurate data gathering possible. Last but not least, we would like to express our appreciation and gratitude to Mr. Hendi Suhardi, head of Pamotan village, Mr. Suhada, head of Ciawitali sub-village, Mr. Suyadi, head of Majingklak sub-village, Pamotan village government authorities, and all parties that we can not mention one by one, who have contributed to the smooth running of data gathering in the field. We were hoping that the outcome of this risk assessment could be used in developing livelihood recovery programs, particularly in the two sub-villages. Pamotan, Agustus 2011
Reporting Team
ii
Table of Content
Cover Page ............................................................................................................................................... i Preface .................................................................................................................................................... ii Table of Content ......................................................................................................................................iii List of Figure ............................................................................................................................................ v List of Table ............................................................................................................................................ vi Executive Summary.................................................................................................................................vii Chapter-1 Introduction .............................................................................................................................1 General Description..................................................................................................................................1 Assessment Objectives ............................................................................................................................1 Target Location ........................................................................................................................................2 Chapter 2 Methodology and Techniques Analysis ....................................................................................3 Assessment Methodology ........................................................................................................................3 Target Group .......................................................................................................................................3 Data Gathering.....................................................................................................................................3 Secondary Data ...................................................................................................................................4 Data Analysis Techniques.........................................................................................................................4 Hazards Analysis..................................................................................................................................4 Vulnerability Analysis ............................................................................................................................4 Risk Analysis........................................................................................................................................5 Risk Map .............................................................................................................................................5 Chapter 3 Result of Risk Analysis .............................................................................................................6 Profile of Majingklak and Ciawitali sub-villages ..........................................................................................6 Locations and Boundaries: ..................................................................................................................6 Area of sub-villages teritorry: ................................................................................................................6 Populations..........................................................................................................................................7 Livelihoods...........................................................................................................................................8 Majingklak and Ciawital sub-village Potentials. .....................................................................................9 General Problems: .............................................................................................................................10 Result of Risk Assessment in Majingklak and Ciawitali Sub-villages ........................................................11 Vulnerability........................................................................................................................................11 Exposure Level ..............................................................................................................................11 Fragility Level .................................................................................................................................12 Lack of Resilience Level.................................................................................................................14 Hazard...............................................................................................................................................16 Risk Level ..........................................................................................................................................19
Report on Rapid Risk Assessment in Majingklak and Ciawitali Sub-villages, Pamotan Village Ciamis Distric iii
Chapter 4 Conclution and Recommendation..........................................................................................20 Conclutions: ...........................................................................................................................................20 Recommendations: ................................................................................................................................20 Bibliography ............................................................................................................................................ xi Appendices ............................................................................................................................................ xiii 1. Risk Analysis Tables ...........................................................................................................................xiv 2. Quistioners ......................................................................................................................................... xv 3. Risk Maps ..........................................................................................................................................xvi
iv
List of Figure
Figure 1 The composition of Population based on Gender .......................................................................7 Figure 2 Compostion of populations based on aged group. .....................................................................7 Figure 3. Comparison of the number of livelihood. ....................................................................................8 Figure 4. Exposure Level ........................................................................................................................11 Figure 5. Fragility Level ...........................................................................................................................12 Figure 6 Majingklak and Ciawitali Communitys Income Level .................................................................13 Figure 7. Comparison of the number of work force the household..........................................................14 Figure 8. Comparison of Family Heads Educational Level in Majingklak and Ciawitali sub-villages .........15 Figure 9. Comparison of the Communitys Lack of Resilience Level........................................................15 Figure 10 Vulnerability Level of Each Family Head in Majingklak and Ciawitali Sub-villages .....................15 Figure 11. Risk Level at Majingklak and Ciawitali sub-village based on Risk Analysis ..............................18 Figure 12. Risk per Household at Majingklak and Ciawitali sub-village. ...................................................19
List of Table
Table 1. Luas Lahan.................................................................................................................................7 Table 2 Percentages of Majingklak and Ciawitali Sub-village...................................................................12 Table 3. List of Disasters .......................................................................................................................16 Table 4 Analysis of the Impact of Hazards on Group of livelihood ...........................................................17 Table 5 Season Calendar of Sea Fishery Activities in Majingklak Its Surrounding Area ............................17 Table 6 Season Calendars of Agricultural Activities in Rawa Apu. Condition after changes occurred ....18
vi
Executive Summary
Risk assessment was conducted in Majingklak and Ciawitali sub-villages, Pamotan village, Kalipucang Sub-District, Ciamis District, West Java province. Located 60 km from the centre of Ciamis District governance, the two sub-villages lie at the estuary of Citanduy River, which forms a natural boundary with Central Java province. Majingklak population is 659 people in number comprising 346 men and 313 women. Ciawitali sub-village has a population of 1963 people comprising 997 men and 96 women. Risk assessment at household level was an initial step in the process of economic and social recovery of the community exposed to hazards caused by nature as well as climate. This risk assessment activity was started with training of enumerators, who were representatives of the two sub-villages. Parameter yang diukur dalam penilaian risiko bencana adalah sebagai berikut: a. Hazards Level. Hazard or danger is an external factor that can have impact on the life of a community and have the potential to affect the communitys risk level. Hazard level analysis aims at identifying pressures posing danger to the community by means of finding out how frequently a disaster occurs and the magnitude of its impact on the risk assessment target population. Hazard level is measured using the formula: H=(F+M)/2 H F M b. = = = Hazards Frequency M agnitude
Vulnerability Level. In the context of disaster risk reduction, vulnerability is a factor and a physical, social, economic, and environmental condition as well as a process that can reduce the communitys capacity in coping with disaster impact or in other words, to what extent a vulnerable individual or group is able to overcome or recover from the impact of a certain pressure. By means of vulnerability level analysis, we can find out to what extent the communities are able to survive and recover from a disaster pressure.
vii
Vulnerability level is assessed using the formula: V=(E+Fr+LoR)/3 V E Fr = = = Vulnerability Exposure Fragility Lack of Resilience
LoR = c. Risk Level
Disaster risk is potential loss caused by disaster impact on a certain territory in a certain period of time that could be in the form of death, injury, illness, endangered life, loss of security, evacuation, property loss or damage, and disruption of the communitys activities. The concept of this risk assessment was adopted from Risk Analysis GuidelinesDiakonie Katastrophenhilfe (Rottach, 2008) steps recommended by ISDR to conducting Risk Assessment (International Strategy for Disaster Reduction, 2008). The risk level of the respective households in the target group was measured based on the above variables using the following formula:
Risiko (Risk) = Bahaya (Hazard) X Kerentanan (Vulnerability)
Atau
Using a ranking systems as follow: 0-3.0 = Low 3.1-6.0 = Moderate 6.1-9.0 = High
The results of risk assessment based on the current condition indicated that hazard level (frequency and magnitude) in the two sub-villages was high and their vulnerability level moderate up to high, 90.79% in Majingklak as well as 37% in Ciawitali sub-village, because of the followingLetak pemukiman dan tempat aktivitas mata pencaharian mereka berada pesisir pantai serta dekat dengan muara Sungai Citanduy menyebabkan masyarakat dusun Majingklak berada pada tingkat terancam Sedang. Sedangkan masyarakat Dusun Ciawitali yang letak pemukiman mereka lebih jauh dari daerah pesisir dan muara Sungai Citanduy. The residential area and the place of their activities to earn a living were located at the coastal region near the estuary of Citanduy river, which made Majingklak sub-village
viii
community be at moderate hazard level. Whereas Ciawitali sub-village with residents living farther from the coastal area and the estuary of Citanduy river were at lower hazard level. Limited number of income sources directly affected the income level of Majingklak and Ciawitali communitys income level. As many as 69.08% of Majingklak community and 64.49% of Ciawitali community earned less than 1 million/month. Limited ownership has significantly contributed to the fragility level. Only 22% of Majingklak residents owned a lot of assets (houses, 4-wheel vehicles, rice fields or gardens), 30% had average assets, and the remaining 47% had very limited assets. Whereas in Ciawitali sub-village, 27% had a great deal of assets, 50% had average assets, and 23% had very limited assets.
Therefore, our recommendations for the communitys livelihood recovery are as follows: On the farm school is one of the means to facilitate changes in agricultural pattern, whereby farmers could learn to provide seed, proper planting pattern, botanical fertilizer and pesticide. Dependence on middlemen could be reduced when farmers could be self-dependent. Facilitate the effort to restore mangrove forest whose function has been shifted by emphasizing communitys involvement. Encourage the community to be willing and able to improve clean water facilities, which will eventually lead to better sanitation in the two sub-villages. Enhance economic growth through alternative livelihood. Livelihood diversification is required to lower the communitys vulnerability level. Find out and note business opportunities that can be handled by women in the attempt to enhance domestic economy. Design and facilitate the implementation of domestic economy development activities, and when possible, find market for the main products already designed. Identify and together with the community to lobby government authorities for proper management of Citanduy River flow area.
ix
Chapter-1 Introduction
General Description
Majingklak, one of the sub-villages in Pamotan village, is located in Citanduy river flow area, which in the past few years has been exposed to different hazards, such as flash flood, flood tide and sedimentation that have been going on since 1904. This was worsened by increasing sedimentation at the estuary of Citanduy River and Segara Anakan region in two decades. Based on data, Citanduy river sedimentation resulted in sedimentation as much as 1 million cubic meters annually. Communities, most of whom depend their livelihood on sea fishery, are much threatened by sedimentation at the estuary of Citanduy River. The lagoon blocked, the ecosystem in it got damaged so there is no longer a place for fish and sea biota to spawn. As a result, fishermen have to go the open sea of the Indian Ocean. Besides, in the rainy season, this area is lacking in clean water and water for irrigation, as all water resources get depleted at the upper river. Throughout the year, drinking water are obtained by buying or retaining rainwater by very simple means and far from being adequate. Rehabilitation activities became crucial by providing technical assistance in developing alternative income sources as well as adaptation measures by utilizing sustainable local resources. Rehabilitation scheme must be able to restore the affected community (Penya, 2008) leading them towards self-dependency. Considering the extensive area of the affected territory, this risk assessment was conducted only in Majingklak and Ciawitali sub-villages, Kalipucang Sub-District, Ciamis District, West Java province. As the two sub-villages are located in the region of Citanduy river estuary and the communitys livelihood is similar to other areas in the southern coast of Java, it could be assumed that the two could serve as a model for the development of livelihood recovery program in other areas. To develop livelihood recovery program, information was required about the entire condition of the community, including their capacity to cope with disaster impact and develop intervention strategies required in a disaster event. This information could be obtained by means of rapid risk assessment.
Assessment Objectives
Identify the type and level of hazards. Identify the communitys vulnerability level. Determine risk level.
1
Identify the amount of coping capacities to recover from a disaster event Identify what efforts could be made to reduce risk in cooperation with the community based on local characteristics.
Target Location
Sub-villages in Ciamis District, i.e. Majingklak and Ciawitali sub-villages, Pamotan village, Kalipucang Sub-District, Ciamis District, West Java province.
Chapter 2 Methodology and Techniques Analysis
Assessment Methodology
Target Group An in-depth interview was conducted with the target group comprising 153 households in Majingklak and 214 households in Ciawitali sub-village to obtain primary data about disaster risk and impact that affected their physical condition as well as their livelihood. Data Gathering Data dikumpulkan dengan menggunakan beberapa metode berikut: Data was gathered using several methods as follows: Observation. Systematic observation and recording of visible elements in a phenomenon or phenomena in the research object (Nawawi, 1990). Hence, the enumerator could directly or indirectly gather indicators of hazards and vulnerability that were happening or had happened in the community, such as environment, livelihood, dangerous points as well as other elements related to this assessment. Questionnaire, i.e. a series of questions arranged in such a way to be answered by respondents in the framework of data gathering process in line with the research objectives. The list of questions (appendix 1) was completed by enumerators during the interview with each head or member of the respective households. Interview with the community (households), farmer groups, and the local government. In-depth interviews with heads or members of the households, women as well as men, were conducted from house to house. Other sources of information included heads of RW (the second smallest administrative unit), community figures, farmer groups and other stakeholders in the village. Transect, whereby enumerators could gather information pertaining to the village topography, land contour, public facilities, physical condition of the buildings and other related data. During the one-week period of data gathering, the enumerator team stayed with local families in the two sub-villages. Focused Group Discussion, whereby the enumerator team could obtain a lot of information pertaining to the village development history, disaster event, season calendar, and means of maintaining livelihood that had then been practiced. Besides, this forum could be utilized to confirm the data and/or findings obtained at household level.
Secondary Data In addition to the primary data obtained by several methods described above, the team also gathered secondary data related to the target group from the village government office and other related institutions.
Data Analysis Techniques

Hazards Analysis Hazard is defined as an event or circumstance that can give rise to disasters (UU Republik Indonesia No. 24 Tahun 2007 tentang Penanggulangan Bencana). By means of risk analysis we can find out the probability of a certain disaster and the magnitude of its impact on the target group. Hazard level is assested from the frequency of disaster (previously) or the probability of its occurrence (in the future), and its magnitude that had previously been experienced. The formula in hazard level assessment is as follows:
By means of ranking system from 1 (low), 2 (moderate) and 3 (high).
Vulnerability Analysis Vulnerability that in the Legislation of the Republic of Indonesia NO. 24/2007 is called Prone of Disasters is defined as geological, biological, hydrological, climatological, social, cultural, political, economic, and technological condition or characteristics in a certain territory for a certain period of time that reduce the capacities to prevent, suppress, reach disaster preparedness, and reduce the capacity to respond to the negative impact of a certain hazard. Vulnerability analysis is used to determine the vulnerability level of each household against a certain disaster. For this analysis, the following formula is used:
1. 2.
Exposure Fragility a. Source of Income b. Amount of Income c. Family Work Force d. Assets e. Physical Conditions of house
4
3.
Lack of Resilience a. Educations Level. b. Social Systems.
Risk Analysis According to Legislation of the Republic of Indonesia No. 24/2007, disaster risk is a potential loss caused by disaster impact in a certain territory and in a certain period of time that could be in the form of death, injury, illness, life threatened, loss of security feeling, evacuation, property damage or loss, and disruption of community activities. The risk level of the respective households in the target group is measured based on the above variables using the following formula:
Risk = Hazard X Vulnerability

or
The ranking system used is as follows: 0.3 = Low 3.1 6.0 = Moderate 6.1 9.0 = High
Appendix 1 and 2 indicate the calculation of risk level of the respective households in the target group.
Risk M ap Hazard map is a map indicating the type and magnitude of hazards in a certain territory. With regard to the two sub-villages (ranking 3). A risk map is a map indicating the risk level of each household in a certain territory. This map also describes several important facilities available, for example roads, bridges, public facilities, and other resources at risk or having positive value for disaster risk reduction. Risk level is shown based on risk analysis ranking system illustrated in different colors: Green = Low Yellow = Moderate Red = High
Chapter 3 Result of Risk Analysis
Profile of Majingklak and Ciawitali sub-villages

Locations and Boundaries: Majingklak and Ciawitali sub-villages are located 60 km from the centre of Ciamis District governance at the estuary of Citanduy River directly bordering on Nusakambangan islan, Central Java province. The two sub-villages were part of Pamotan village, Kalipucang SubDistrict, Ciamis District, West Java province, directly bordering on the following: At the North At the East At the South At the West : : : : Rawaapu village, Patimuan Sub-District, Cilacap District, Central Java province. Nusakambangan island, Cilacap District, Central Java province Bagalo village, Kalipucang Sub-District, Ciamis District, West Java province. Kalipucang village, Kalipucang Sub-District, Ciamis District, West Java province.
Majingklak sub-village population coming from Cilacap District territory are mostly outsiders who earn their living as fisherman. Since 1950, people have starting moving to this sub-village and as time went by, the number kept increasing, particularly when their travelling place was getting smaller due to sea water inundation. The biggest problem faced by Majingklak community was the decreasing catch of fish, while cost of living kept on increasing coupled with clean water shortage, whereas people living in Ciawitali sub-village was a bit better off with their agricultural products from rice fields and plantation besides working as fisherman.
Area of sub-villages teritorry: The sub-village is 755.3 Ha in area, not including the residents agricultural land located outside Majingklak and Ciawitali sub-villages. Nearly most residents of the two sub-villages doing agricultural activities function as landowners as well as farmlands outside the sub-village as the agricultural land is located outside the sub-village territory.
Table 1. Land Area Land Area/Ha Pamotan Rice Field Stateowened land Community Land Stateowened Forest Community Foresr Fisheries 128 85 60 10 132,3 1 Ciawitali 170 121 92 15 142,95 1,50 Majingklak 57,66 105,00 39,70 8,99 1,50
Land
Jumlah Pendududuk Dusun Majingklak dan Ciawitali
Populations
1000
Majingklak population is 659 people in number, comprising 346 men and 313 women. Ciawitali Jumlah Pendududuk Dusun Majingklak 750 Ciawitali dan has a population of 1963 people comprising 997 men and 996 women. 997 996
500 Total 1963
KEADAAN JIWA Male 2622
HH 250 617 181

Female 798 997 346 1343 996 313 1309 Total 1963 659 2622 HH 617 181 798
Male Female
CIAWITALI
997
346
996
1000 750 500 250
313
659
MAJINGKLAK
Male
Female CIAWITALI
346
313
Komposisi Penduduk
MAJINGKLAK
Figure 1 The composition of Population based on Gender Komposisi Penduduk

Majingklak 34 24 57 62 54 344 86 Ciawitali 99 72 172 183 162 1032 256 1500
9 1500
1032
1032
1125
1125
JIWA
750
750
JIWA
34 99 24
72
172 34 99 57
24
0-2 y.o
72
183
57
172
344 54
62
3-5 y.o
0-2 y.o
62
162
183 162 54
344
375
256 86
86 256
375
6-12 y.o
3-5 y.o
13- 15 y.o
6-12 y.o
16-19 y.o
Majingklak
13- 15 y.o
16-19 y.o
20-55 y.o Majingklak

Majingklak CIawitali 26% 14% 3% 0% 11% 12% 31% Majingklak 63 0 6 6 26 2 248 351 CIawitali 190 102 19 3 80 89 221 721
0% 20% 40%
20-55 y.o
Ciawitali
Ciawitali
> 55 yo
> 55 yo
Majingklak 63 0 6 6 26 2 248 0 351
CIawitali
18% 0% 2% 2% 1% 0%
Figure 2 Compostion of populations based on aged group.

Chart 25
190 102 3 89 17 721
Chart 25
60% 80%
7% 19 71% 80
2% 2%
0% 20% 40% 80% 2% Report on 0 Rapid17Risk Assessment in Majingklak and Ciawitali Sub-villages, 60% Pamotan Village Ciamis Distric 7%
221
2%
2%
Majingklak
1% 18% 71% 0%
7%
Majingklak
1%
Komposisi Penduduk
1500
1032
1125
Livelihoods
JIWA
750
Majingklak (71%) and Ciawitali (31%) community in general earn their living from fishery (fish, 34 99 172 344 crabs, cockle24 72 and shrimps), while they obtain another source of income from agriculture shells, 375 183 57 0-2 y.o (Majingklak 18%, Ciawitali 26%), where they work as land owners or farm lands, cultivating 62 162 3-5 y.o 256 54 different kinds of seasonal y.o 6-12 commodities.
16-19 usually sold by the community 0 Fishery, agricultural, and plantation products are y.o themselves or 20-55 y.o through middlemen. Other income sources include, among others, trading, animal husbandry > 55 yo (local goats, cows, and poultry), provision of tour transportation service, and others (figure 3). Majingklak Ciawitali 13- 15 y.o
86
What is meant by laborers here are those working as fishermen but not having boats of their own, farm hands, people sapping oil palm for sugar, construction who sometimes have to work outside the village, while self-employed include people running their own business, such as fish Chart 25 sellers, hawkers, making snacks, running food stalls, making media for seedlings, and other home industries.
0% 20% 40% 60% 80%
2% 2% 7%
Majingklak
1% 18% 71% 0% 3% 11%

14%
CIawitali
12% 2% 26% 31%
Government Civil Servant Traders Breeder Farmers
Labor/Private Sectors Emp Hodge Handyman Fishermen
Figure 3. Comparison of the number of livelihood.
M ajingklak and Ciawital sub-village Potentials. Majingklak and Ciawitali sub-villages have the following potentials: The majority of the sub-village population own agricultural and plantation land, on the average 2000 m2, including the land located outside the sub-village territory. Access roads from several villages with the construction of a harbour (though no longer functional due to sedimentation in the harbor area), which used to provide access to Nusakambangan Island. 1. Community activities as economic support a) b) c) Home industry (snacks) Farmer groups Fisherman groups
Other supporting activities included the following:
2. Educational facilities available in the sub-village vicinity: 3 primary schools/Islamic schools. 3. Health facilities comprising 3 Integrated Service Posts and 1 Subsidiary Post 4. Sub-village institutions, namely PKK (Neighbourhood Woman Assosiation), Karang Taruna (Youth Association), SAR, Farmer Group, Fisherman Groups. 5. Religious facilities: 5 mosques
General Problem s: Results of the Focused Group Discussion (FGD) together with community representatives (community figures, religious personage, parents, and other village elements) revealed a number of major problems faced by Majingklak and Ciawitali sub-villages as follows: Lack of sanitation in the sub-village environment Unavailability of clean water supply throughout the year, so that residents bad to buy clean water Flood tide reaching the residential area Sedimentation at the estuary of Citanduy River made it difficult for the fishermen to go to sea, in the waters around the sub-village or to the open sea, particularly at low tide. Besides, coral reef damage caused drastic decrease in their catch, as there were no longer any fish around the harbour or shallow waters. Marketing of fishery, agricultural as well as plantation products still relied on middlemen. Mangrove forest destruction due to illegal logging. Flash flood through Citanduy River. Shift in seasons (west/east wind, high and low tide, and variable rain), so that flood or drought could not be predicted. Citanduy river abrasion in several areas that brought about conflict among land owner/agricultural workers. Unstable supply of animal feed because of weather disturbance that affected different varieties of grass and plants. Increasing price of fishery equipment (engines, boats), agricultural tools, seedling, fertilizer and chemicals. Farmers still dependent on synthetic fertilizer and chemicals. Lack of knowledge of good quality seed cultivation, so that farmers always had to buy seed. Lack of information about organic agricultural system and not depending on factories.
10
Result of Risk Assessment in Majingklak and Ciawitali Sub-villages

Vulnerability Exposure Level From geographical location viewpoint, the two sub-villages are situated at the estuary of Citanduy River, which is one of the critical river flow areas in Indonesia. This was caused by the decline of land quality with quite high intensity and erosion level that had exceeded the limit of tolerance around 24.0 tons/ha/year (Astuti, Dharmawan, Kumala, & Indrawan, 2008). It was not surprising that every year the two sub-village territories were flooded by the overflow of Citanduy River. In 2010 only, at least 105 Ha of rice fields within Kalipucang Sub-District underwent harvest failure because of floods (Pikiran Rakyat Online, 2010). From the results of interview and field observation, it was found that when the floods hit the sub-villages, the residential area was inundated up to 20-40cm. These sub-villages were also exposed to several other hazards, such as flood tide caused by the flowing in of seawater to the land at high tide. This flood tide inundated not only the settlement area but also rice fields, which caused damage to the plants due to high salinity. Besides floods and flood tide, earthquakes could occur any time, because this area was located in the subduction zone. In 2006, the earthquake in this zone brought about the tsunami disaster that devastated most of the southern coastal region of West Java. Climate change-related factor also posed hazards to this area, among others strong wind, drought, unpredictable season changes, and in Cilacap waters, the sea level was recorded to be rising 1.30mm/year (Hadikusuma, 1993).
Figure 4. Exposure Level
The data obtained from the risk assessment indicated that 100% families in Majingklak subvillage were exposed to the above hazards, whereas in Ciawitali, most families were at moderate exposure level (76.17%), 7.48% at high, and 16.36% at low exposure level (figure 4).
11
Fragility Level Based on the assessment results, it was found that on the average the two sub-villages were at vulnerable level. In Majingklak sub-village, 59 families or 38.82% were found to be very vulnerable, 82 or 53.95% at vulnerable, and 11 families or 7.24% at low vulnerable level. Meanwhile in Ciawitali sub-village, 49 families or 23.9% were very vulnerable, 154 or 71.96% vulnerable, and 11 families or 5.14% at low vulnerability level. (figure 5)
Figure 5. Fragility Level
This was caused by the limited number of livelihood sources available. Since floods and flood tide had made the land prepared for cultivation become unproductive. As a result, farmers as land owners or agricultural workers suffered a loss. Similarly, fishermen could not go to sea owing to unpredictable weather, whereas catching fish in shallow waters was no longer possible because of sedimentation at the estuary of Citanduy River.
Table 2 Percentages of Majingklak and Ciawitali Sub-village Communitys Income Sources
Source of Incom es Sub-villages Majingklak Ciawitali A lot of Sources 9% 4% Average 70% 69% 1 Income Sources 21% 27%
The limited number of income sources directly affected the sub-village communitys income level. In the FGD it was found that monthly income of Rp. 1,000,000 was just enough to meet basic needs without any amount left for other needs because of the high cost of living in that area. Take for example, since clean water was difficult to obtain, people had to buy clean water that was quite expensive.
12
From figure 6 we could see that on the average, residents of the two villages have and income level below Rp. 1,000,000 a month, while 64.49% of Ciawitali residents earn less than Rp. 1,000,000 a month.
Figure 6 Majingklak and Ciawitali Communitys Income Level
Limited assets also gave significant contribution to fragility level, because if a pressure should occur, it would be difficult for the community to recover from that condition. Household having a lot of resources, investment and networking would have several strategies when needed. From the data gathered revealed that only 22% of Majingklak community had a lot of assets (houses, 4 wheel vehicles, rice fields as well as gardens), 30% had average assets, and the remaining 47% had very limited assets. In Ciawitali sub-village, 27% had a lot of assets, 50% had average assets, and 23% had very limited assets. The group owning more assets tended to have varied means of living and hence, at least one of them could help in critical time. The number of people having employment in each household was another factor that contributed to vulnerability level. The assessment results revealed that 61.84% (figure 7) of the total sample in Majingklak and 48.6% in Ciawitali only had people with employment less than 50% per household. This indicated that on the average, each household had only one person worked as the breadwinner.
13
Elementary School
High School
Univerity
Angkatan Kerja
61.84%
48.60%
9.87% 28.29%
17.29%
Majingklak
34.11%
Ciawitali
Moderate Lots
Low
Figure 7. Comparison of the number of work force the household
Limited member of employed people per household (< 50%) was one of the factors that triggered fragility, because the smaller the number of people in employment in each household, the more difficult it would be if anything happened to the bread winner. On the other hand, the more employed people available in a household should one of them be out of work, they would still be able to survive as there were still others in the family that could become bread winner. Exposure of livelihood sources to various hazards, the limited number of employed people in the family, limited assets and the communitys low-income level has contributed to the high fragility level of the two sub-villages.
Lack of Resilience Level Educational level and knowledge constituted one of the factors that affected lack of resilience level (Twigg, 2007). From the assessment results it was found that in Majingklak sub-village only 1.32% family heads had college education and 77.63% were only primary school leavers, not much different from Ciawitali sub-village, where 86-92% only completed primary school education (figure 8). The low educational level could cause the community to be lacking in resilience against the impact of a disaster due to inadequate knowledge of efforts to immediately recover from the impact, and this condition also made the community become dependent on assistance from the third party. On the other hand, despite the low level of education on the part of most family heads, the communitys social system played an important role and enhanced the communitys resilience against hazards as well as outside pressures. The existing system proved to be running well enough as evident from the availability community groups like PKK (Neighbourhood Woman Association), Karang Taruna (Youth Association), farmer and fisherman) groups and several other social activities.
14
Majingklak Ciawitali
100.00%
Tingkat Exposure
Tingkat Pendidikan
Tingkat Pendapatan Masyarakat
Pendapatan High Average Low Majingklak Ciawitali 27.63% 23.36% 76.17% 3.29% 12.15% 69.08% 64.49%
77.63% 86.92%
Tingkat Pendapatan Masyarakat

Ketidaktahanan High Moderate Low
% Tingkat Kerapuhan % Tingkat Kerentanan
69.08% 64.49%
Tingkat Kerapuhan Masyarakat
Kerapuham
Majingklak
High Moderate Low
High
Majingklak Ciawitali 38.82% 22.90% Ciawitali 53.95% 71.96% 7.24% 5.14%

Moderate Low
7.48%
16.36%
% Tingkat Pendapatan
21.05%
1.32% 12.62% 0.47%
71.96% 53.95% 38.82%
Majingklak
27.63% 23.36% Elementary School
High School
Ciawitali
Majingklak
Ciawitali 0.00%
Univerity
0.00% Figure 77.63% 22.37%
8. Comparison of Family Heads Educational Level in Majingklak and Ciawitali sub-villages 86.92% 12.15%
13.08%
3.29%
22.90%
Kerentanan High Moderate Low
From the results of data gathering Tingkat Kerapuhan Masyarakat 77.63% households in Majingklak in the field and analysis, Average 64.49% Low Majingklak in Ciawitali sub-village were found to be at moderate lack of resilience level. Ciawitali and 86.92%
34.21% 0.47% Majingklak Ciawitali
High Moderate
69.08%
High
Angkatan Kerja
7.24% Majingklak
Ciawitali
5.14%
65.79% 97.20% The smooth running of the communitys social system proved to be able to lower the sub0.00% 2.34% Tingkat village communitys lack of resilience61.84% though Masyarakat the people had only primary school Exposure level, most of Tingkat Ketidaktahanan 71.96% Tingkat Kerentanan Masyarakat Ancaman education.
Low
% Tingkat Pendapatan
Majingklak
Ciawitali
.63% 23.36%
High Moderate Low Resiko High 12.15% Moderate 3.29% Low
0.00% 100.00% 0.00%
0.00% 22.43% 77.57%
53.95% 38.82% 77.63%
48.60%
100.00%
97.20%
% Tingkat Kerapuhan
86.92%
76.17%
65.79% 34.21%
% Tingkat Ketidaktahanan
Majingklak Ciawitali 47.37% 0.00% 52.63% 61.21% 0.00% 38.79%
22.90% 9.87%
28.29%
17.29%
High Average Exposure

Majingklak Ciawitali Low 100.00% Ciawitali 0.00% 0.00% 7.48% 76.17% 16.36%
% Tingkat Resiko
Majingklak 22.37% 7.24% Majingklak

Majingklak
Low
34.11%
Ciawitali
5.14% Ciawitali 13.08% Moderate Lots
Ciawitali Low
Low
Majingklak High
16.36% 0.47% 7.48% Majingklak 2.34% Majingklak Ciawitali Ciawitali

High
Moderate Low
High
High
Moderate
Moderate
High
Moderate
Moderate
Low
Low
Tingkat Tingkat Ketidaktahanan Masyarakat Pendidikan
Tingkat Kerentanan Masyarakat Figure 9. Comparison of the Communitys Lack of Resilience Level
77.63%
Elementary School High School 86.92% Univerity Angkatan Kerja Low Moderate Lots
Tingkat Resiko Masyarakat
97.20% 65.79% Tingkat Ancaman Terhadap Masyarakat 34.21%

47.37% 52.63% 61.21%
% Tingkat Ancaman % Tingkat Kerentanan
22.37%
% Tingkat Ketidaktahanan
38.79%
100.00%
High Moderate
13.08%
Majingklak
0.47%
77.57%
2.34%
High Moderate Low
Ciawitali
High
High Moderate Low Tingkat Resiko Masyarakat
Low
Moderate
22.43%
Low
Figure 10 Vulnerability Level of Each Family Head in Majingklak and Ciawitali Sub-villages
Tingkat Ancaman Terhadap Masyarakat
47.37%
52.63%
61.21%
38.79%
% Tingkat Resiko
15
100.00%
% Ti
77.57%
Majingklak
High exposure to a certain hazard of a community, most of who were fragile and lacking in resilience against that hazard, made them became vulnerable, and even very vulnerable. The assessment results indicated that the sub-village community was at vulnerable (Majingklak 65.79%, Ciawitali 97.02%) and very vulnerable level (Majingklak 34.21%, Ciawitali 0.47%). Only 2.34% family heads in Ciawitali sub-village were not vulnerable (figure 10).
Hazard The Focused Group Discussion also revealed that the two sub-villages had been experiencing a lot of hazards since 1970s, which became even worse with the shallowing of estuary of Citanduy River. In addition, several great disasters like Pangandaran tsunami, Tasikmalaya and Cilacap earthquakes once almost completely destroyed the southern coastal area of West Java, the two sub-villages included. Geographically, the two sub-villages are situated in earthquake and tsunami prone area (BNPB map), as they located in the subduction zone where earthquakes might occur any time. Results of the identification of disaster events that happened in the two sub-villages recorded by the local community during FGD were listed below (table 3).
Table 3. List of Disasters
NO
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
YEAR
1970 -1980 1980s 1982 to date 1996 2000s 2006 2009
DESCRIPTION
Cyclone (10 houses damaged) Citanduy river abrasion Shallowing (after Mt. Galunggung eruption) Fish catching area getting farther to the open sea Fish getting scarcer Huge waves at Relawangan 9 month drought Sea water intrusion (30 metres) Tsunami Tasikmalaya earthquake Cilacap earthquake Storm Floods 2x every year (1 x day time and 2x night time) Inundating houses 30cm Sea tide Heavy rain (sea tide, Citanduy river overflowing), floods in Majingklak West wind, fishermen could not going to sea for 1 month (Feb March) East wind, huge waves, drought, tidal waves (June-September).
2010 - 2011
9 10
Every year Every year
Besides using record of disaster events to identify the hazard level of the two communities, the assessment team also made analysis of the impact of hazards on the groups of livelihood, to find out and identify which ones were affected by climate related and disaster risks.
Report on Rapid Risk Assessment in Majingklak and Ciawitali Sub-villages, Pamotan Village Ciamis Distric 16
Table 4 Analysis of the Impact of Hazards on Group of livelihood
The data used in the analysis of the impact of hazards on groups of livelihood were obtained during FGD that was conducted together with the community who directly experienced the impact of hazards on their livelihood. From table 4 we could see that the groups of livelihood most affected by climate as well as nonclimate hazards were agriculture, sea fishery, and small traders. From the above index, we could see that the redder the index value was, the climate as well as non-climate hazards had considerable impact on the groups of livelihood concerned. Conversely, the greener the index value was, the groups of livelihood concerned were not affected by hazards.
Table 5 Season Calendar of Sea Fishery Activities in Majingklak Its Surrounding Area
Most of Majingklak residents relied on fish catching as their source of income. Other similar activities could only be done for three months, from September through November (table 5). This condition was worsened by unpredictable wind and weather recently and ongoing sedimentation at the estuary of Citanduy River, which was the only fishermens access to the catching area. To deal with this, the people usually did activities other than fishery, such as
Report on Rapid Risk Assessment in Majingklak and Ciawitali Sub-villages, Pamotan Village Ciamis Distric 17
growing crops on the existing land or becoming workers. Agricultural activities themselves were not free from weather change pressure. Table 6 indicated that besides changing weather, the number and kinds of diseases attacking agricultural commodities were also more varied and on the increase. This condition made it more difficult for farmers to take care of the plants. It was always possible that the coming pest and diseases could not be predicted, and as a result, the use of pesticide became ineffective. Moreover, climate change also had negative impact. Too heavy rainfall would cause planting and harvest failure, while sea water intrusion would render agricultural land uncultivable.
Table 6 Season Calendars of Agricultural Activities in Rawa Apu. Condition after changes occurred
Besides the above points, from the assessment results it was found that the whole communities in Majingklak sub-village were 91.45% at high level (posed to direct hazards). This was caused by the location of the residential area and the place they did their activities to earn their living was located at the coastal area and close to the estuary of Citanduy River. While Ciawitali subvillage community whose residential area was located farther from the coastal area and the estuary of Citanduy River, 92.99% were also found to be at high level of direct pose of hazards (figure 11).
Hazards
91.45%
92.99%
100.00% 75.00% 50.00%
High Moderate Low
8.55%
25.00%
7.01%
Majingklak
0%
Ciawitali
Figure 11. Risk Level at Majingklak and Ciawitali sub-village based on Risk Analysis
Risk
90.79%
9.21%
49.07%
50.93% 18
100.00% 75.00% 50.00% 25.00% 0%
High Moderate Low
Risk Level The results of the assessment and analysis indicated that families residing in this village, whether in or not in the coastal area or not, were at high-risk level, in Majingklak 90.79% as well Risk as in Ciawitali 49.07%.
90.79% High Moderate Low
100.00% 75.00%
49.07% 9.21% 50.93%
50.00% 25.00% 0%
Figure 12. Risk per Household at Majingklak and Ciawitali sub-village.
The high-risk level in this area was mainly due to the geographical location of Pamotan village territory, which had high exposure level (in Majingklak sub-village, even all families were exposed or 100% exposure) and the high level of hazards, particularly to several main livelihoods the community were engaged in. The livelihood most affected by hazards brought about by nature or climates were fishery and agriculture (Table 4). Based on FGD, climate change proved to have contributed to the high level of hazards to the communitys sources of livelihood (Table 5 and Table 6). The existing data revealed that although the two sub-villages were at risk, Majinkglak had a higher risk than Ciawitali. This was caused by the fact that most families residing in Majingklak sub-village were of low-income level and did not have many livelihood sources. The low educational level and limited number of employed people in the family also contributed to the high-risk level of Majingklak sub-village.
19
Chapter 4 Conclution and Recommendation
Conclutions:
The residential area and the place where they worked to earn their living were located in the coastal area and close to the estuary of Citanduy river causing Majingklak and Ciawitali sub-village community to be at very high hazard level. Several hazards identified were: flood tide caused by sea water intrusion into the land because of high tide inundating residential area and ricefield clusters, earthquakes since this area is located in the subduction zone and tsunami. Families that were part of Majingklak and Ciawitali sub-village community were found to be vulnerable with moderate-high vulnerability level. Limited number of income sources directly influenced Majingklak and Ciawitali communitys income level. At household level, the two sub-villages were found to be at moderate vulnerability level. Limited assets and family heads low educational level made the families vulnerability become high (at moderate level) Majingklak and Ciawitali sub-village community were lacking in resilience against exernal hazards as well as pressures. For this reason, the communitys capacity needs to be improved, especially in the efforts to reduce disaster risk and adapt to existing environment and when the disaster was over, they could attempt to resume their work to meet their needs. (Penya, 2008). The communitys social system played very important role, particularly in the process of increasing the communitys resilience. Risk at family level in both villages was found to be at moderate high level
Recommendations:
Hence our recommendations for the two sub-villages were related to the communitys livelihood recovery through the following activities: On the farm school is one of the means to facilitate changes in agricultural pattern, whereby farmers could learn to supply seed, apply proper planting method, provide fertilizer and organic pesticide. Dependence on middlemen could be reduced when farmers are able to become self-dependent. Study of potential resources and analysis of the latest condition in the Rapid Assessment location is required to find out the extent of the hazard impact and predict future condition.
20
Facilitate the efforts to restore the mangrove forest with shifted function by emphasizing the communitys involvement. Enhance economic growth through alternative livelihoods, livelihood diversification needs to be attempted at to reduce the communitys vulnerability level. On the look out for and record business opportunities that could be handled by woman in the attempt to promote domestic economy. Design and facilitate the implementation of domestic economy development activities, and when possible, find a market for the designed product. Encourage the community to be willing and able to improve clean water facilities that will eventually lead to the improvement of sanitation in the two sub-villages. Identify and together with the community lobby government authorities for the management of Citanduy River flow area.
21
Bibliography
ActionAid International. Participatory Vulnerability Analysis, Guide for Staff. Astuti, Y. A., Dharmawan, A. H., Kumala, I. E., & Indrawan, A. (2008). Struktur Nafkah Rumahtangga dan Pengaruhnya terhadap Kondisi Ekosistem Sub DAS Citanduy Hulu. Jurnal Transdisiplin Sosiologi, Komunikasi, dan Ekologi Manusia , 2. Bethke, L., Good, J., & Thompson, P. (1997). Building capacities for risk reduction. United Nations, Disaster Management Training Program. Care International. (2002). Household Livelihood Security Assessment; a toolkit for practitioners. Tango International Inc. HEKS; Brot Fur Alle;. (2010). Participatory Tools on Climate and Disaster Risk. Working Paper. Husein, R. Coping Humanitarian Crisis and Building Community Resiliency:A case study of Muhammadiyah microfinance program after earthquake in Yogyakarta 2004, Indonesia. IFRC. (2008). Guidlines for assessment in emergency. International Strategy for Disaster Reduction. (2008). Linking Disaster Risk Reduction and Poverty Reduction. United Nations. K, M. Community Resilience and Disaster Risk Reduction: The role of social workers in community based disaster programmes. University of Botswana. Kohler, A., Julich, S., & Bloemertz, L. (2004). Guidlines Risk Analysis - a Basis for Disaster Risk Management. Eschborn, Germany: Gesellschaft fur Techniche Zusammenarbeit (GTZ) GmbH. Map Action. (2009). Field Guide to Humanitarian Mapping (Vol. 1). Nawawi, H. H. (1990). Metode Penelitian Bidang Sosial. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press. Penya, J. L. (2008). Characteristics of a Disaster Resilience Community : A Guidance Note. London: Christian Aid. Pikiran Rakyat Online. (2010, Mei 18). www.pikiran-rakyat.com. Retrieved from Pikiran Rakyat Online. Practicalaction. (n.d.). http://practicalaction.org/disasterlivelihoods/disaster_approaches_hazards. Provention Consortium. Risk Reduction Indicators. report, TRIAMS. Provention Consortium. Tools for Mainstreaming Disaster Risk Reduction: Vulnerability and Capacity Analisis. Guidance Note.
xi
Rottach, P. (2008). Background and Component of Disaster Risk Reduction. Stuttgart: Diakonie Katastrophenhilfe. Twigg, J. (2007). Caracteristics of a Disaster-resilient Community: A Guidance Note. London: DFID. UU Republik Indonesia No. 24 Tahun 2007 tentang Penanggulangan Bencana. Wisner, B., Blaikie, P., Cannon, T., & Davis, I. (2003). At Risk: natural hazards, peoples vulnerability and disasters: 2nd Edition. London: Routledge. World Bank. Economic Vulnerability and Disaster Risk Assessment in Malawi and Mozambique. Zahur, M. (2007). Application of Characteristics of a Disaster-Resilient Community. Church World Sevice - Pakistan/Afganistan.
xii
Appendices
xiii
1. Risk Analysis Tables
xiv
FRAGILITY No. House hold Montly Income Sub-Village Exposure Source of Incobe c Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp 900,000 900,000 850,000 1,200,000 900,000 1,200,000 900,000 1,500,000 1,500,000 1,200,000 650,000 1,200,000 500,000 900,000 900,000 900,000 1,500,000 1,200,000 1,800,000 900,000 900,000 1,000,000 1,200,000 1,000,000 500,000 450,000 1,100,000 900,000 1,200,000 900,000 1,200,000 900,000 1,200,000 900,000 900,000 1,000,000 900,000 1,000,000 900,000 3,000,000 900,000 1,500,000 1,500,000 800,000 750,000 800,000 900,000 500,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 900,000 1,000,000 500,000 500,000 1,000,000 900,000 1,500,000 1,500,000 600,000 900,000 500,000 1,500,000 1,500,000 900,000 900,000 1,500,000 900,000 1,500,000 2,250,000 1,500,000 1,000,000 900,000 1,500,000 1,200,000 900,000 950,000 900,000 700,000 1,200,000 900,000 850,000 1,125,000 Ciawitali Ciawitali Ciawitali Ciawitali Ciawitali Ciawitali Ciawitali Ciawitali Ciawitali Ciawitali Ciawitali Ciawitali Ciawitali Ciawitali Ciawitali Ciawitali Ciawitali Ciawitali Ciawitali Ciawitali Ciawitali Ciawitali Ciawitali Ciawitali Ciawitali Ciawitali Ciawitali Ciawitali Ciawitali Ciawitali Ciawitali Ciawitali Ciawitali Ciawitali Ciawitali Ciawitali Ciawitali Ciawitali Ciawitali Ciawitali Ciawitali Ciawitali Ciawitali Ciawitali Ciawitali Ciawitali Ciawitali Ciawitali Ciawitali Ciawitali Ciawitali Ciawitali Ciawitali Ciawitali Ciawitali Ciawitali Ciawitali Ciawitali Ciawitali Ciawitali Ciawitali Ciawitali Ciawitali Ciawitali Ciawitali Ciawitali Ciawitali Ciawitali Ciawitali Ciawitali Ciawitali Ciawitali Ciawitali Ciawitali Ciawitali Ciawitali Ciawitali Ciawitali Ciawitali Ciawitali Ciawitali Ciawitali 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 2 1 1 1 2 2 1 2 2 2 2 1 3 1 3 3 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 2 1 1 1 1 3 2 2 1 2 2 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 d 3 3 3 1 3 1 3 1 1 1 3 1 3 3 3 3 1 1 1 3 3 2 1 2 3 3 1 3 1 3 1 3 1 3 3 2 3 2 3 1 3 1 1 3 3 3 3 3 2 2 3 2 3 3 2 3 1 1 3 3 3 1 1 3 3 1 3 1 1 1 2 3 1 1 3 3 3 3 1 3 3 1 Labor Total Force/House Income hold e 2 3 3 2 2 3 2 3 2 2 3 2 3 3 3 2 3 2 2 3 2 3 3 2 3 2 2 3 3 1 2 3 3 3 1 2 2 3 3 3 2 1 3 1 2 2 2 1 3 1 3 3 3 3 2 3 1 2 3 2 3 1 3 3 3 3 2 2 3 3 3 2 1 2 3 2 3 2 3 2 3 2 f 2 2 1 2 2 2 3 1 2 2 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 3 2 1 1 2 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 3 1 3 1 2 1 2 2 2 1 1 3 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 3 1 2 2 2 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 2 1 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 3 1 3 Assets g 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 1 2 2 1 3 2 3 3 3 2 3 2 3 1 3 1 3 3 1 1 3 1 1 1 1 3 1 1 3 2 1 2 2 2 2 3 2 1 2 1 3 1 3 3 3 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 3 1 2 2 2 1 1 2 2 2 1 1 2 3 2 2 1 2 3 2 3 3 3 Physical Conditions of House h Total
RISK ANALISYS Ciawitali VULNERABILITY LACK OF RESILIENCE Average i=(d+e+f+g +h)/5 2 2.2 2.2 1.8 2.2 2 2.4 1.6 1.8 1.8 2 2 2.4 2.6 2.6 2.4 2 2 1.8 2.6 2 2.4 1.6 2.4 2.6 1.8 1.4 2.6 1.6 1.6 1.4 2.2 2.2 2.2 1.8 2.2 2.4 1.8 2.6 1.8 2.2 1.4 2.2 2 2 2 1.8 2.4 1.8 1.8 2.6 2.4 2.4 2.4 2 2.6 1.2 1.6 2.2 2.4 2.2 1.4 2 2.2 2.2 1.6 2.2 1.8 1.8 1.8 2 2.2 1.6 1.6 2.2 1.8 2.4 2.4 2 2.6 2.4 2.2 Fragility Category Educational Social Level Systems k 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 2 2 2 2 3 2 2 2 2 3 2 1 3 2 2 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 2 2 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 2 2 2 2 3 1 2 2 2 2 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 2 2 3 3 3 2 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 2 3 3 3 2 3 3 2 2 2 2 3 3 3 3 2 2 2 2 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 2 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 2 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 l 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Total m=k+l 4 4 4 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 3 4 4 4 3 4 4 3 3 3 3 4 4 4 4 3 3 3 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 Average n=(k+l)/2 2 2 2 1.5 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 1.5 2 2 2 1.5 2 2 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 2 2 2 2 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 1.5 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 1.5 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0
HAZARD Total Average Vulnerability Frequency Magnitude LoR E + F +R (E+F+R/3) Category Category o=c+i+n 6.0 6.2 6.2 5.3 6.2 6.0 6.4 5.6 5.8 5.8 6.0 5.5 6.4 6.6 6.6 5.9 6.0 6.0 5.3 6.1 5.5 4.9 5.6 6.4 6.6 5.8 4.9 6.1 6.1 5.1 5.4 6.2 6.2 6.2 5.8 6.2 5.4 5.8 5.6 4.8 5.2 4.9 6.2 5.0 6.0 6.0 5.8 6.4 4.8 6.8 5.6 7.4 7.4 6.4 6.0 6.6 5.2 5.1 6.2 5.4 6.2 4.4 5.0 5.2 5.2 6.6 6.2 5.8 4.8 5.8 6.0 5.2 5.6 5.6 6.2 5.8 6.4 6.4 6.0 6.6 6.4 6.2 p=o/3 2.0 2.1 2.1 1.8 2.1 2.0 2.1 1.9 1.9 1.9 2.0 1.8 2.1 2.2 2.2 2.0 2.0 2.0 1.8 2.0 1.8 1.6 1.9 2.1 2.2 1.9 1.6 2.0 2.0 1.7 1.8 2.1 2.1 2.1 1.9 2.1 1.8 1.9 1.9 1.6 1.7 1.6 2.1 1.7 2.0 2.0 1.9 2.1 1.6 2.3 1.9 2.5 2.5 2.1 2.0 2.2 1.7 1.7 2.1 1.8 2.1 1.5 1.7 1.7 1.7 2.2 2.1 1.9 1.6 1.9 2.0 1.7 1.9 1.9 2.1 1.9 2.1 2.1 2.0 2.2 2.1 2.1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 q 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 r 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Total Average Hazard Category
RISK 1-3 VxH
RISK CATEGORY 3,1 - 6 6,1 - 9
Low h=(d+e+f+g+h) 10 11 11 9 11 10 12 8 9 9 10 10 12 13 13 12 10 10 9 13 10 12 8 12 13 9 7 13 8 8 7 11 11 11 9 11 12 9 13 9 11 7 11 10 10 10 9 12 9 9 13 12 12 12 10 13 6 8 11 12 11 7 10 11 11 8 11 9 9 9 10 11 8 8 11 9 12 12 10 13 12 11 s=q+r 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 t=s/2 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 u=pXt 6.0 6.2 6.2 5.3 6.2 6.0 6.4 5.6 5.8 5.8 6.0 5.5 6.4 6.6 6.6 5.9 6.0 6.0 5.3 6.1 5.5 4.9 5.6 6.4 6.6 5.8 4.9 6.1 6.1 5.1 5.4 6.2 6.2 6.2 5.8 6.2 5.4 5.8 5.6 4.8 5.2 4.9 6.2 5.0 6.0 6.0 5.8 6.4 4.8 6.8 5.6 7.4 7.4 6.4 6.0 6.6 5.2 5.1 6.2 5.4 6.2 4.4 5.0 5.2 5.2 6.6 6.2 5.8 4.8 5.8 6.0 5.2 5.6 5.6 6.2 5.8 6.4 6.4 6.0 6.6 6.4 6.2 MODERATE HIGH HIGH MODERATE HIGH MODERATE HIGH MODERATE MODERATE MODERATE MODERATE MODERATE HIGH HIGH HIGH MODERATE MODERATE MODERATE MODERATE HIGH MODERATE MODERATE MODERATE HIGH HIGH MODERATE MODERATE HIGH HIGH MODERATE MODERATE HIGH HIGH HIGH MODERATE HIGH MODERATE MODERATE MODERATE MODERATE MODERATE MODERATE HIGH MODERATE MODERATE MODERATE MODERATE HIGH MODERATE HIGH MODERATE HIGH HIGH HIGH MODERATE HIGH MODERATE MODERATE HIGH MODERATE HIGH MODERATE MODERATE MODERATE MODERATE HIGH HIGH MODERATE MODERATE MODERATE MODERATE MODERATE MODERATE MODERATE HIGH MODERATE HIGH HIGH MODERATE HIGH HIGH HIGH
Moderate
High
a 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82
b AMUN TINI TARMIDI DEDE DANI RUMIDI TATANG WARSONO ADMAN WARDI JASMAN WATNO ACENG DASIM TASMINIDI GINEM SUBARDI NYCAN KARSIM INDRA DADI MIRAN HERMAN MUHIDIN RANIS NURSIN KACID SAHIDIN KOMAR WAGIMAN DARYONO SAWON SIMIN DAHIL UMAR RASIDI AHMAD ATEP ROBLIN ELI SARDI MUZSIDI SOPAN SUPIAN IRWAN SATIMAH UCU RASIM SAHIDIN SAWIYEM MISLAM RAHMAN KISWO SATUN KHOLIJAH MANISAH SEMAN JUAN MISNO DEDE PRIYANTO OKOY MISNAN RUKMINI GAMUN WATNO JUM'AN ATING TURAHMAN SAHINDI SUGENG WARSITO WAWAN H ROSADI JUM'AN CNE TUKIMIN SAPON ADE R MUHTAR SAIMUN BASRI YULIANTO TURMAN SAMAN KASRI
Page 1
Analisis Ciawitali
FRAGILITY No. House hold Montly Income Sub-Village Exposure Source of Incobe c Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp 900,000 700,000 900,000 850,000 750,000 850,000 1,200,000 900,000 500,000 150,000 1,500,000 500,000 150,000 500,000 700,000 500,000 1,000,000 1,500,000 1,000,000 500,000 1,200,000 475,000 600,000 900,000 700,000 425,000 1,100,000 600,000 600,000 1,000,000 500,000 450,000 1,700,000 1,200,000 1,500,000 2,000,000 800,000 700,000 450,000 750,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 900,000 1,000,000 900,000 1,500,000 900,000 1,000,000 500,000 900,000 900,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 1,000,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 1,000,000 500,000 500,000 100,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 250,000 500,000 500,000 100,000 300,000 100,000 500,000 500,000 200,000 300,000 Ciawitali Ciawitali Ciawitali Ciawitali Ciawitali Ciawitali Ciawitali Ciawitali Ciawitali Ciawitali Ciawitali Ciawitali Ciawitali Ciawitali Ciawitali Ciawitali Ciawitali Ciawitali Ciawitali Ciawitali Ciawitali Ciawitali Ciawitali Ciawitali Ciawitali Ciawitali Ciawitali Ciawitali Ciawitali Ciawitali Ciawitali Ciawitali Ciawitali Ciawitali Ciawitali Ciawitali Ciawitali Ciawitali Ciawitali Ciawitali Ciawitali Ciawitali Ciawitali Ciawitali Ciawitali Ciawitali Ciawitali Ciawitali Ciawitali Ciawitali Ciawitali Ciawitali Ciawitali Ciawitali Ciawitali Ciawitali Ciawitali Ciawitali Ciawitali Ciawitali Ciawitali Ciawitali Ciawitali Ciawitali Ciawitali Ciawitali Ciawitali Ciawitali Ciawitali Ciawitali Ciawitali Ciawitali Ciawitali Ciawitali Ciawitali Ciawitali Ciawitali Ciawitali Ciawitali Ciawitali Ciawitali Ciawitali 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 2 3 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 2 3 3 2 3 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 2 2 3 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 3 2 2 2 2 3 3 3 3 2 2 2 1 2 1 3 2 2 2 1 2 3 2 1 2 2 3 2 2 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 d 3 3 3 3 3 3 1 3 3 3 1 3 3 3 3 3 2 1 2 3 1 3 3 3 3 3 1 3 3 2 3 3 1 1 1 1 3 3 3 3 2 2 3 2 3 1 3 2 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 2 3 3 3 3 2 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Labor Total Force/House Income hold e 1 2 2 3 2 1 3 2 1 3 2 2 1 1 3 3 3 2 2 1 1 3 3 2 3 2 2 3 3 3 2 3 2 3 2 2 1 2 1 1 2 2 2 3 2 3 2 3 3 2 3 3 3 2 3 3 3 3 3 2 3 1 3 3 1 3 3 1 3 3 3 1 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 2 2 f 3 2 2 2 1 3 1 2 2 3 2 3 2 3 1 1 3 2 2 2 1 2 3 2 3 2 3 3 3 2 3 2 1 1 1 1 2 3 3 2 1 2 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 3 2 2 2 2 2 1 2 3 3 2 3 1 2 3 3 2 2 2 3 1 2 2 2 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Assets g 1 2 2 3 3 3 2 3 3 3 1 3 2 3 3 1 3 1 1 2 2 2 3 3 1 1 3 3 3 3 3 3 2 2 2 1 2 3 3 3 3 3 3 1 1 1 3 1 1 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 1 3 1 2 3 2 3 1 1 2 1 2 1 2 2 2 3 3 3 2 3 2 1 Physical Conditions of House h Total
RISK ANALISYS Ciawitali VULNERABILITY LACK OF RESILIENCE Average i=(d+e+f+g +h)/5 2 2.2 2.2 2.6 2.2 2.4 1.8 2.4 2.2 2.8 1.6 2.6 2 2.4 2.4 2 2.6 1.6 1.8 2 1.6 2.6 3 2.4 2.4 2 2.2 3 3 2.6 2.8 2.6 1.6 1.8 1.4 1.4 1.8 2.8 2.4 2.2 2 2 2.4 2 2 1.4 2.4 1.8 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.2 2.4 2.2 2.2 2.6 3 2.2 3 1.6 2.6 3 2.4 2.8 2.4 2 2.8 2.2 2.6 2 2.6 2.8 2.8 3 3 3 2.8 3 2.6 2.4 Fragility Category Educational Social Level Systems k 2 2 2 3 2 2 2 2 2 3 2 3 2 2 2 2 3 2 2 2 2 3 3 2 2 2 2 3 3 3 3 3 2 2 1 1 2 3 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 2 3 2 3 3 2 3 2 2 3 2 3 2 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 2 3 2 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 2 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 2 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 2 2 3 3 3 3 3 2 3 3 3 3 3 2 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 l 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Total m=k+l 4 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 3 3 4 4 4 4 4 3 4 4 4 4 4 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 Average n=(k+l)/2 2 1.5 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 1.5 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 1.5 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 1.5 1.5 2 2 2 2 2 1.5 2 2 2 2 2 1.5 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0
HAZARD Total Average Vulnerability Frequency Magnitude LoR E + F +R (E+F+R/3) Category Category o=c+i+n 6.0 5.7 6.2 6.6 6.2 6.4 5.8 6.4 6.2 6.8 5.6 6.6 5.0 6.4 7.4 5.0 6.1 5.6 5.8 6.0 5.6 5.6 6.6 7.0 6.4 6.4 6.0 6.2 7.0 7.0 6.6 6.8 6.6 5.6 5.8 5.4 4.9 6.8 6.8 7.4 7.2 6.0 7.0 6.4 5.5 5.5 5.4 6.4 5.8 6.4 6.4 4.9 6.4 6.4 6.2 6.4 6.2 5.7 6.6 7.0 6.2 7.0 5.6 6.6 7.0 5.4 6.8 6.4 7.0 5.8 6.2 6.6 6.0 6.6 6.8 6.8 7.0 7.0 7.0 6.8 7.0 6.6 p=o/3 2.0 1.9 2.1 2.2 2.1 2.1 1.9 2.1 2.1 2.3 1.9 2.2 1.7 2.1 2.5 1.7 2.0 1.9 1.9 2.0 1.9 1.9 2.2 2.3 2.1 2.1 2.0 2.1 2.3 2.3 2.2 2.3 2.2 1.9 1.9 1.8 1.6 2.3 2.3 2.5 2.4 2.0 2.3 2.1 1.8 1.8 1.8 2.1 1.9 2.1 2.1 1.6 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.1 1.9 2.2 2.3 2.1 2.3 1.9 2.2 2.3 1.8 2.3 2.1 2.3 1.9 2.1 2.2 2.0 2.2 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 q 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 r 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Total Average Hazard Category
RISK 1-3 VxH
Low h=(d+e+f+g+h) 10 11 11 13 11 12 9 12 11 14 8 13 10 12 12 10 13 8 9 10 8 13 15 12 12 10 11 15 15 13 14 13 8 9 7 7 9 14 12 11 10 10 12 10 10 7 12 9 12 12 12 12 12 11 12 11 11 13 15 11 15 8 13 15 12 14 12 10 14 11 13 10 13 14 14 15 15 15 14 15 13 12 s=q+r 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 t=s/2 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 u=pXt 6.0 5.7 6.2 6.6 6.2 6.4 5.8 6.4 6.2 6.8 5.6 6.6 5.0 6.4 7.4 5.0 6.1 5.6 5.8 6.0 5.6 5.6 6.6 7.0 6.4 6.4 6.0 6.2 7.0 7.0 6.6 6.8 6.6 5.6 5.8 5.4 4.9 6.8 6.8 7.4 7.2 6.0 7.0 6.4 5.5 5.5 5.4 6.4 5.8 6.4 6.4 4.9 6.4 6.4 6.2 6.4 6.2 5.7 6.6 7.0 6.2 7.0 5.6 6.6 7.0 5.4 6.8 6.4 7.0 5.8 6.2 6.6 6.0 6.6 6.8 6.8 7.0 7.0 7.0 6.8 7.0 6.6 MODERATE MODERATE HIGH HIGH HIGH HIGH MODERATE HIGH HIGH HIGH MODERATE HIGH MODERATE HIGH HIGH MODERATE HIGH MODERATE MODERATE MODERATE MODERATE MODERATE HIGH HIGH HIGH HIGH MODERATE HIGH HIGH HIGH HIGH HIGH HIGH MODERATE MODERATE MODERATE MODERATE HIGH HIGH HIGH HIGH MODERATE HIGH HIGH MODERATE MODERATE MODERATE HIGH MODERATE HIGH HIGH MODERATE HIGH HIGH HIGH HIGH HIGH MODERATE HIGH HIGH HIGH HIGH MODERATE HIGH HIGH MODERATE HIGH HIGH HIGH MODERATE HIGH HIGH MODERATE HIGH HIGH HIGH HIGH HIGH HIGH HIGH HIGH HIGH
Moderate
High
a 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164
b TUMIRAH TUSINO MARNO MISDI SANTOSA RASIM SUYATNA WASMAN DARYAH JEMRANG TAJUDIN RASIMAN SATINAH RAJIN BEJA MAMAT ANDI YAYAT YAYAN KASMIRI SUYATNA ANIH SAHIDI EDO TOTO HENDARTO KASTARI SUKIN ROHILI KOSIR SAKIMAN KASWANTO SARNO NANA ROJAK TUGIMAN AYO ENO KARSIMIN RANU MINGIN ILI TUK SAIMAN IMIN TOPIT ADE KUSMANA KARDI IWAN ALO TANO ROKAYAH CICIN JUNO HS NONO BASUKI SADIMAN YANTO KIRIN NARTO SUKIRMAN JITO DEDI NAWIN NARDI TOHA KASWADI KUSNO LASMINI RATIM JUMAR MAMIN ATEP SUPRIADI KARSUM KITAM EDI KADIARJO BIHIN SUBHAN DASAM TARMINI SAIA HASAN WATI HASIM OONG BASIRUN NGALIMIN
Page 2
Analisis Ciawitali
FRAGILITY No. House hold Montly Income Sub-Village Exposure Source of Incobe c Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp 500,000 1,000,000 500,000 2,200,000 800,000 900,000 9,000,000 1,500,000 500,000 750,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 1,500,000 750,000 850,000 300,000 600,000 700,000 800,000 780,000 1,500,000 1,500,000 1,500,000 1,500,000 900,000 1,500,000 750,000 900,000 900,000 900,000 700,000 900,000 900,000 350,000 900,000 500,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,200,000 1,500,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 900,000 900,000 900,000 500,000 Ciawitali Ciawitali Ciawitali Ciawitali Ciawitali Ciawitali Ciawitali Ciawitali Ciawitali Ciawitali Ciawitali Ciawitali Ciawitali Ciawitali Ciawitali Ciawitali Ciawitali Ciawitali Ciawitali Ciawitali Ciawitali Ciawitali Ciawitali Ciawitali Ciawitali Ciawitali Ciawitali Ciawitali Ciawitali Ciawitali Ciawitali Ciawitali Ciawitali Ciawitali Ciawitali Ciawitali Ciawitali Ciawitali Ciawitali Ciawitali Ciawitali Ciawitali Ciawitali Ciawitali Ciawitali Ciawitali Ciawitali Ciawitali Ciawitali Ciawitali 2 1 2 2 2 2 1 2 2 2 2 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 2 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 1 2 2 3 2 2 2 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 2 2 3 2 3 3 2 3 2 2 3 2 1 3 3 3 2 2 2 3 2 2 3 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 2 3 2 2 2 1 3 3 1 2 3 2 2 2 2 3 3 1 d 3 2 3 1 3 3 1 1 3 3 2 2 3 3 3 1 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 1 1 1 1 3 1 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 2 2 1 1 2 2 2 3 3 3 3 Labor Total Force/House Income hold e 3 3 2 3 2 3 3 3 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 3 1 3 1 3 2 1 3 2 1 2 3 1 3 1 2 3 1 3 3 3 1 2 1 3 1 1 3 1 3 2 1 2 2 1 f 1 2 2 3 3 3 3 2 3 3 1 1 2 2 2 3 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 2 1 1 1 1 3 1 1 2 2 3 1 1 2 2 3 1 2 1 3 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 Assets g 2 3 1 2 3 3 3 3 2 3 1 1 2 2 2 2 3 3 2 2 2 1 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 1 3 2 1 1 1 3 1 2 1 2 2 2 3 3 3 1 2 Physical Conditions of House h Total
RISK ANALISYS Ciawitali VULNERABILITY LACK OF RESILIENCE Average i=(d+e+f+g +h)/5 2.2 2.4 2.2 2.2 2.8 3 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.6 1.8 1.6 2 2.6 2.6 2.4 2.2 2.6 2 2.6 2.2 1.8 3 1.6 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.6 2 1.8 2 2.2 1.8 3 2.2 2 1.8 1.8 2.6 2 1.6 1.2 2.4 1.6 2 2.2 2.2 2.6 2.2 1.8 Fragility Category Educational Social Level Systems k 2 2 2 2 3 3 2 2 2 3 2 2 2 3 3 2 2 3 2 3 2 2 3 2 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 2 2 2 2 3 2 2 1 2 2 2 2 2 3 2 2 2 3 3 3 3 2 3 3 2 3 2 3 3 3 3 2 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 2 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 2 1 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 l 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Total m=k+l 3 4 4 4 4 3 4 4 3 4 3 4 4 4 4 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 3 2 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 Average n=(k+l)/2 1.5 2 2 2 2 1.5 2 2 1.5 2 1.5 2 2 2 2 1.5 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 1.5 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 1.5 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 1.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0
HAZARD Total Average Vulnerability Frequency Magnitude LoR E + F +R (E+F+R/3) Category Category o=c+i+n 6.4 4.7 6.4 6.2 6.2 6.8 5.5 6.4 6.4 5.9 6.6 4.3 5.6 6.0 6.6 6.6 5.9 6.2 6.6 7.0 7.6 6.2 6.8 6.0 4.6 4.2 4.4 4.6 4.6 5.0 4.8 5.0 4.7 5.8 7.0 5.2 6.0 5.8 6.8 6.6 6.0 5.6 3.7 5.4 5.6 6.0 6.2 6.2 6.6 7.2 p=o/3 2.1 1.6 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.3 1.8 2.1 2.1 2.0 2.2 1.4 1.9 2.0 2.2 2.2 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.5 2.1 2.3 2.0 1.5 1.4 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.7 1.6 1.7 1.6 1.9 2.3 1.7 2.0 1.9 2.3 2.2 2.0 1.9 1.2 1.8 1.9 2.0 2.1 2.1 2.2 2.4 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 2 2 2 2 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 q 3 3 3 3 3 2 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 r 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Total Average Hazard Category
RISK 1-3 VxH
Low h=(d+e+f+g+h) 11 12 11 11 14 15 12 12 12 13 9 8 10 13 13 12 11 13 10 13 11 9 15 8 6 7 8 8 10 9 10 11 9 15 11 10 9 9 13 10 8 6 12 8 10 11 11 13 11 9 s=q+r 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 5.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 6.0 6.0 t=s/2 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 2.50 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 2.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 3.00 3.00 u=pXt 6.4 4.7 6.4 6.2 6.2 5.7 5.5 6.4 6.4 5.9 6.6 4.3 5.6 6.0 6.6 6.6 5.9 6.2 6.6 7.0 7.6 6.2 6.8 6.0 4.6 4.2 4.4 4.6 4.6 5.0 4.8 5.0 4.7 5.8 5.8 4.3 5.0 4.8 5.7 5.5 5.0 4.7 3.1 4.5 4.7 5.0 5.2 5.2 6.6 7.2 HIGH MODERATE HIGH HIGH HIGH MODERATE MODERATE HIGH HIGH MODERATE HIGH MODERATE MODERATE MODERATE HIGH HIGH MODERATE HIGH HIGH HIGH HIGH HIGH HIGH MODERATE MODERATE MODERATE MODERATE MODERATE MODERATE MODERATE MODERATE MODERATE MODERATE MODERATE MODERATE MODERATE MODERATE MODERATE MODERATE MODERATE MODERATE MODERATE MODERATE MODERATE MODERATE MODERATE MODERATE MODERATE HIGH HIGH
Moderate
High
a 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214
b ENDANG S YONO UEN GANJIL KOHAR WAHYU P ADMAN DAHMAN AYO MAINAH SURWI DARSO PRAYITNO RUKMINTO JUMANA MAHPUDIN YADI SATANG NARTO PARAWANGI ENGKUS MULYONO JAMIN KINDUNG KEHED KIDAM SARYO UDIN SUHENDI TILI RAWING SURYANA KARSADI IYUS MISWAN DAJAIN DUL ASPAR JOHAN UNAS ENTIS SUMARNA RISLAM KICIP DAYAT SUPYAN MARYONO SUHRI SIRIN SUTAR WISMAN
Page 3
Analisis Ciawitali
FRAGILITY No. House hold Montly Income Sub-Village Exposure Source of Incobe d 2 3 2 2 3 3 2 2 3 1 1 1 2 3 3 3 2 2 3 3 3 3 3 1 2 3 3 1 3 2 2 1 3 2 1 3 1 3 1 2 3 3 1 1 3 1 2 2 3 3 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 2 3 2 2 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 1 3 3 3 1 3 3 3 1 3 1 3 1 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 1 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 1 3 1 3 3 1 1 3 1 1 3 1 1 1 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 1 3 3 1 3 3 3 3 1 1 1 3 3 3 1 1 3 1 3 3 3 1 3 1 1 3 3 1 1 3 Labor Total Force/House Income hold e 3 2 2 2 2 1 3 1 1 3 1 1 2 1 3 2 2 3 1 3 3 3 2 2 3 3 3 3 3 3 2 1 1 3 2 1 2 3 3 3 3 1 3 2 2 2 3 2 3 3 2 2 3 2 3 2 3 3 2 1 2 2 3 3 3 3 3 3 2 2 3 2 3 3 3 2 3 2 3 2 3 3 3 3 3 f 3 3 3 3 3 3 2 1 3 1 1 3 1 3 3 3 3 2 3 3 3 3 2 1 3 3 3 2 3 1 2 2 3 3 2 3 1 3 1 3 2 3 1 1 3 1 1 2 2 3 2 2 3 2 1 2 2 1 2 1 2 1 3 1 1 2 3 3 3 1 2 1 2 2 2 3 1 2 1 1 3 3 1 3 3 Physical Assets Conditions of House g 3 3 2 2 2 2 1 1 3 1 1 1 1 3 3 1 3 2 2 3 3 2 3 2 2 3 2 1 2 2 2 2 3 3 1 3 1 3 1 3 1 2 1 1 3 2 1 3 2 3 2 3 3 2 2 2 2 1 2 2 3 1 3 1 1 3 3 2 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 3 1 3 2 1 3 3 1 1 1 h Total
RISK ANALISYS Majingklak VULNERABILITY LACK OF RESILIENCE Average Fragility Category Educational Social Level Systems k 3 3 2 2 3 2 2 2 3 2 1 2 1 3 3 2 3 2 2 3 3 3 3 1 3 3 3 2 3 2 2 2 3 3 1 3 1 3 2 2 2 2 1 1 3 1 2 2 3 3 2 2 3 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 2 2 2 3 3 2 1 2 2 2 2 2 3 2 2 2 1 3 3 2 2 2 3 3 2 3 3 3 2 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 2 2 3 3 3 3 3 2 2 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 1 3 2 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 2 3 3 3 2 2 2 3 3 2 3 2 3 3 3 1 2 2 3 3 2 3 3 3 3 2 3 3 3 2 3 l 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Total Average Rata-rata Total Vulnerability (E+F+R/3 LoR E + F +R Category ) Category o=c+i+n 2.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 7.8 7.8 6.5 7.4 7.6 7.4 6.3 6.6 7.6 6.8 6.0 6.8 6.4 7.6 7.6 7.4 7.6 7.4 7.4 8.0 8.0 7.8 7.6 5.9 7.1 8.0 7.8 7.0 7.8 7.2 6.7 6.3 7.6 7.8 6.4 7.6 6.2 8.0 6.8 7.4 6.0 7.4 5.9 6.2 7.8 6.4 6.6 7.0 7.6 8.0 7.2 7.4 7.8 7.2 6.7 6.8 7.4 7.2 6.3 6.5 6.9 6.8 8.0 6.3 6.8 6.9 8.0 7.8 7.4 5.2 6.3 6.3 6.8 7.4 6.7 7.6 6.6 7.4 6.8 5.9 7.8 7.8 6.6 6.5 7.4 p=o/3 2.6 2.6 2.2 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.1 2.2 2.5 2.3 2.0 2.3 2.1 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.7 2.7 2.6 2.5 2.0 2.4 2.7 2.6 2.3 2.6 2.4 2.2 2.1 2.5 2.6 2.1 2.5 2.1 2.7 2.3 2.5 2.0 2.5 2.0 2.1 2.6 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.5 2.7 2.4 2.5 2.6 2.4 2.2 2.3 2.5 2.4 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.3 2.7 2.1 2.3 2.3 2.7 2.6 2.5 1.7 2.1 2.1 2.3 2.5 2.2 2.5 2.2 2.5 2.3 2.0 2.6 2.6 2.2 2.2 2.5 3 3 2 2 3 2 2 2 3 2 2 2 2 3 3 2 3 2 2 3 3 3 3 2 2 3 3 2 3 2 2 2 3 3 2 3 2 3 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 2 2 2 3 3 2 2 3 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 2 2 2 3 3 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 2 2 2 2 3 3 2 2 2
HAZARD Frequency Magnitude Total Average Hazard Category
RISK 1-3 VxH
Low h=(d+e+f i=(d+e+f +g+h) +g+h)/5 14 14 10 12 13 12 9 8 13 9 5 9 7 13 13 12 13 12 12 15 15 14 13 7 13 15 14 10 14 11 11 9 13 14 7 13 6 15 9 12 10 12 7 6 14 7 8 10 13 15 11 12 14 11 11 9 12 11 9 10 12 9 15 9 9 12 15 14 12 6 9 9 9 12 11 13 8 12 9 7 14 14 8 10 12 2.8 2.8 2 2.4 2.6 2.4 1.8 1.6 2.6 1.8 1 1.8 1.4 2.6 2.6 2.4 2.6 2.4 2.4 3 3 2.8 2.6 1.4 2.6 3 2.8 2 2.8 2.2 2.2 1.8 2.6 2.8 1.4 2.6 1.2 3 1.8 2.4 2 2.4 1.4 1.2 2.8 1.4 1.6 2 2.6 3 2.2 2.4 2.8 2.2 2.2 1.8 2.4 2.2 1.8 2 2.4 1.8 3 1.8 1.8 2.4 3 2.8 2.4 1.2 1.8 1.8 1.8 2.4 2.2 2.6 1.6 2.4 1.8 1.4 2.8 2.8 1.6 2 2.4 m=k+l 4 4 3 4 4 4 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 3 3 4 4 4 4 4 3 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 2 4 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 3 4 4 4 3 3 3 4 4 3 4 3 4 4 4 2 3 3 4 4 3 4 4 4 4 3 4 4 Page 1 4 3 4 n=(k+l)/2 2 2 1.5 2 2 2 1.5 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 1.5 1.5 2 2 2 2 2 1.5 1.5 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 2 1.5 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 1.5 2 2 2 1.5 1.5 1.5 2 2 1.5 2 1.5 2 2 2 1 1.5 1.5 2 2 1.5 2 2 2 2 1.5 2 2 2 1.5 2 q 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 2 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 r 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 s=q+r 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 5.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 t=s/2 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 2.50 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 2.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 u=pXt 7.8 7.8 6.5 7.4 7.6 7.4 6.3 6.6 7.6 6.8 6.0 6.8 6.4 7.6 7.6 7.4 7.6 7.4 7.4 8.0 8.0 7.8 7.6 5.9 7.1 8.0 7.8 7.0 7.8 7.2 6.7 6.3 7.6 7.8 6.4 7.6 6.2 8.0 6.8 7.4 6.0 7.4 5.9 6.2 7.8 6.4 6.6 7.0 7.6 8.0 7.2 7.4 7.8 7.2 6.7 6.8 7.4 7.2 6.3 6.5 6.9 6.8 8.0 6.3 6.8 6.9 8.0 7.8 7.4 4.3 6.3 6.3 6.8 7.4 6.7 7.6 6.6 7.4 6.8 5.9 7.8 7.8 6.6 6.5 7.4 HIGH HIGH HIGH HIGH HIGH HIGH HIGH HIGH HIGH HIGH MODERATE HIGH HIGH HIGH HIGH HIGH HIGH HIGH HIGH HIGH HIGH HIGH HIGH MODERATE HIGH HIGH HIGH HIGH HIGH HIGH HIGH HIGH HIGH HIGH HIGH HIGH HIGH HIGH HIGH HIGH MODERATE HIGH MODERATE HIGH HIGH HIGH HIGH HIGH HIGH HIGH HIGH HIGH HIGH HIGH HIGH HIGH HIGH HIGH HIGH HIGH HIGH HIGH HIGH HIGH HIGH HIGH HIGH HIGH HIGH MODERATE HIGH HIGH HIGH HIGH HIGH HIGH HIGH HIGH HIGH MODERATE HIGH HIGH HIGH HIGH HIGH
Moderate
High
a 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85
b SUPARDI SUMI AGUS PAIJAN MUSO IBU DIKEM MISTO SUNARSO SARTONO SUMARNO RW KUSWA WALUYO BUDI SUPARMA WAGIMAH JABARDUN EDI SUTRISNO DARTO PARNO HARTINI TENDI IBU SITI SUTARNO TUGIM SUPARJO TONO EFENDI NGADIMIN SUJANA SUYANTO NGADIMI SLAMET ARIFIN TEGUH SUJADI IBU PANI SUGENG KUSWANDI IBU BUNEK SAIRA MARSIEM SURYA AGUS RAMDANI COWI AMINAH JUMONO MUSWA IBU LIA SUPARMIN SLAMET RIYADI IMAM BUDI SAHDI NASIR IYAS T. SUMARNO KARYO AHMAD MUKLASIN SUPRAPTO ABAH UKUS MAMAT R KASA ENPAD YOYOM SUMARNO WAGIMAN RUDI MBAH SURYO SURATMO PONO TARMIN BEJA RUHYAN OMAN SUPIN S TUGINO SUKARMAN SADIO SURALIWON SUNARDI JATAM HANA DULAH TARKIM MISTAM SUPANDI A. WARSITO SAMINGUN Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp 300,000 850,000 1,500,000 900,000 600,000 450,000 1,500,000 600,000 300,000 750,000 1,500,000 600,000 1,500,000 300,000 450,000 900,000 900,000 300,000 750,000 300,000 900,000 900,000 1,500,000 900,000 600,000 600,000 600,000 600,000 750,000 900,000 900,000 150,000 750,000 3,000,000 300,000 3,000,000 300,000 900,000 1,500,000 1,800,000 450,000 1,500,000 1,500,000 450,000 1,500,000 1,500,000 1,500,000 600,000 300,000 900,000 900,000 600,000 900,000 900,000 1,500,000 900,000 900,000 3,000,000 750,000 900,000 900,000 900,000 3,000,000 3,000,000 1,500,000 800,000 600,000 900,000 3,000,000 2,300,000 900,000 1,500,000 900,000 900,000 300,000 1,200,000 600,000 1,500,000 3,000,000 600,000 750,000 1,500,000 1,500,000 900,000 Majingklak Majingklak Majingklak Majingklak Majingklak Majingklak Majingklak Majingklak Majingklak Majingklak Majingklak Majingklak Majingklak Majingklak Majingklak Majingklak Majingklak Majingklak Majingklak Majingklak Majingklak Majingklak Majingklak Majingklak Majingklak Majingklak Majingklak Majingklak Majingklak Majingklak Majingklak Majingklak Majingklak Majingklak Majingklak Majingklak Majingklak Majingklak Majingklak Majingklak Majingklak Majingklak Majingklak Majingklak Majingklak Majingklak Majingklak Majingklak Majingklak Majingklak Majingklak Majingklak Majingklak Majingklak Majingklak Majingklak Majingklak Majingklak Majingklak Majingklak Majingklak Majingklak Majingklak Majingklak Majingklak Majingklak Majingklak Majingklak Majingklak Majingklak Majingklak Majingklak Majingklak Majingklak Majingklak Majingklak Majingklak Majingklak Majingklak Majingklak Majingklak Majingklak Majingklak Majingklak Majingklak 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
Analisis Majingklak
FRAGILITY No. House hold Montly Income Sub-Village Exposure Source of Incobe d 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 3 1 3 3 3 1 3 3 3 1 1 1 3 3 1 3 3 3 3 1 2 1 3 2 1 1 1 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 2 3 2 3 3 3 2 3 3 3 Labor Total Force/House Income hold e 3 3 2 3 3 3 2 2 3 3 3 3 1 3 3 3 2 3 2 3 3 3 3 3 2 3 2 2 3 3 3 3 3 3 2 3 3 3 3 3 3 1 3 1 3 3 3 3 2 3 3 3 2 3 2 3 3 3 3 3 3 2 3 2 3 3 3 f 1 2 1 2 1 3 2 3 2 2 3 3 1 2 2 3 3 3 3 1 3 3 1 2 1 3 1 2 1 1 2 3 3 3 3 2 3 3 3 2 2 3 2 3 3 3 2 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 2 3 3 3 2 2 3 2 2 2 3 2 2 Physical Assets Conditions of House g 2 1 2 3 1 2 2 2 1 2 2 2 1 2 2 2 2 3 3 1 3 3 3 2 2 1 2 1 1 2 1 3 3 3 3 2 1 3 2 2 1 3 2 2 3 3 2 3 3 3 3 3 3 2 2 3 3 3 1 1 3 1 3 1 3 1 3 h Total
RISK ANALISYS Majingklak VULNERABILITY LACK OF RESILIENCE Average Fragility Category Educational Social Level Systems k 2 2 2 3 2 3 2 2 2 2 3 3 1 2 2 3 2 2 3 2 3 3 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 3 3 2 2 3 3 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 2 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 2 3 3 3 2 2 3 2 3 2 3 2 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 2 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 2 3 3 3 3 3 2 3 3 2 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 2 3 2 3 3 3 2 3 3 2 2 3 2 3 3 3 2 3 2 3 3 3 3 2 3 3 2 l 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Total Average Rata-rata Total Vulnerability (E+F+R/3 LoR E + F +R Category ) Category o=c+i+n 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 6.8 6.8 6.6 7.6 6.6 7.6 7.2 7.4 6.8 7.4 7.6 7.1 6.2 7.0 7.0 7.6 7.4 7.4 7.6 6.5 7.8 7.8 7.0 7.2 6.6 6.9 6.8 6.6 6.1 6.8 7.2 7.8 7.8 7.8 7.6 7.4 7.4 7.8 7.6 7.4 6.7 7.4 6.9 7.2 7.8 7.8 6.9 7.8 7.6 7.3 7.3 7.8 7.1 7.6 7.2 7.8 7.3 7.6 6.7 7.0 7.8 7.0 7.6 6.3 7.8 7.2 7.1 p=o/3 2.3 2.3 2.2 2.5 2.2 2.5 2.4 2.5 2.3 2.5 2.5 2.4 2.1 2.3 2.3 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.2 2.6 2.6 2.3 2.4 2.2 2.3 2.3 2.2 2.0 2.3 2.4 2.6 2.6 2.6 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.6 2.5 2.5 2.2 2.5 2.3 2.4 2.6 2.6 2.3 2.6 2.5 2.4 2.4 2.6 2.4 2.5 2.4 2.6 2.4 2.5 2.2 2.3 2.6 2.3 2.5 2.1 2.6 2.4 2.4 2 2 2 3 2 3 2 2 2 2 3 2 2 2 2 3 2 2 3 2 3 3 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 3 3 2 2 3 3 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 2 3 3 2 2 3 2 3 2 3 2 3 2 2 3 2 3 2 3 2 2
HAZARD Frequency Magnitude Total Average Hazard Category
RISK 1-3 VxH
Low h=(d+e+f i=(d+e+f +g+h) +g+h)/5 9 9 8 13 8 13 11 12 9 12 13 13 6 10 10 13 12 12 13 10 14 14 10 11 8 12 9 8 8 9 11 14 14 14 13 12 12 14 13 12 11 12 12 11 14 14 12 14 13 14 14 14 13 13 11 14 14 13 11 10 14 10 13 9 14 11 13 1.8 1.8 1.6 2.6 1.6 2.6 2.2 2.4 1.8 2.4 2.6 2.6 1.2 2 2 2.6 2.4 2.4 2.6 2 2.8 2.8 2 2.2 1.6 2.4 1.8 1.6 1.6 1.8 2.2 2.8 2.8 2.8 2.6 2.4 2.4 2.8 2.6 2.4 2.2 2.4 2.4 2.2 2.8 2.8 2.4 2.8 2.6 2.8 2.8 2.8 2.6 2.6 2.2 2.8 2.8 2.6 2.2 2 2.8 2 2.6 1.8 2.8 2.2 2.6 m=k+l 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 3 4 4 4 4 4 3 4 4 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 3 4 3 4 4 4 3 4 4 3 3 4 3 4 4 4 3 4 3 4 4 4 4 3 4 4 3 n=(k+l)/2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 1.5 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 1.5 2 2 2 2 2 1.5 2 2 1.5 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 1.5 2 1.5 2 2 2 1.5 2 2 1.5 1.5 2 1.5 2 2 2 1.5 2 1.5 2 2 2 2 1.5 2 2 1.5 q 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 2 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 2 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 2 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 2 r 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 s=q+r 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 5.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 5.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 5.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 6.0 5.0 t=s/2 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 2.50 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 2.50 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 2.50 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 3.00 2.50 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 2.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 2.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 2.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 3.00 2.00 u=pXt 6.8 6.8 6.6 7.6 6.6 7.6 7.2 7.4 6.8 7.4 7.6 7.1 5.2 7.0 7.0 7.6 7.4 7.4 7.6 6.5 7.8 7.8 7.0 7.2 6.6 6.9 6.8 6.6 5.1 6.8 7.2 7.8 7.8 7.8 7.6 7.4 7.4 7.8 7.6 7.4 6.7 7.4 6.9 6.0 7.8 7.8 6.9 7.8 7.6 7.3 7.3 7.8 7.1 7.6 7.2 7.8 7.3 6.3 5.6 5.8 6.5 5.8 6.3 5.3 6.5 7.2 5.9 HIGH HIGH HIGH HIGH HIGH HIGH HIGH HIGH HIGH HIGH HIGH HIGH MODERATE HIGH HIGH HIGH HIGH HIGH HIGH HIGH HIGH HIGH HIGH HIGH HIGH HIGH HIGH HIGH MODERATE HIGH HIGH HIGH HIGH HIGH HIGH HIGH HIGH HIGH HIGH HIGH HIGH HIGH HIGH MODERATE HIGH HIGH HIGH HIGH HIGH HIGH HIGH HIGH HIGH HIGH HIGH HIGH HIGH HIGH MODERATE MODERATE HIGH MODERATE HIGH MODERATE HIGH HIGH MODERATE
Moderate
High
a 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152
b RUJIT ARJO SUMITRO REBO SUPARYO SUJARWO TURAH ATIMO JONI S NASIM DARNO LASEM TURYONO SUTRISNO SUMO SUBARDI SUPAR TUBAN PAIJO SATINO TEGUR SISWANTO MAD PAIJAN KARYONO WARIS GONO GINO E WAJI ENO WARSONO TOTO MARYANTO UNTUNG BUDIONO JUMSA SLAMET NGAS BOLOT MAMAT IBU DANI SURIP P SUMERI REJA WUTUH RUSMANTO SARNO TUMINAH KARTEM ALAN LANTARU NYAI PADI AGUS T SUTARDI JAMIN KADIR SURATMAN AGUS SUPRIANTO HADI NANANG KOHIRIN ARIFIN KARNO WARNO ROHANTO SUPARNO NASIRUN D. SUHERMAN SAEPUDIN SOLEH SAINO MULYADI SADIRAMSORI BASUKI SARTIM Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp Rp 1,200,000 1,500,000 1,500,000 600,000 3,000,000 900,000 900,000 900,000 1,500,000 900,000 900,000 600,000 1,500,000 1,200,000 1,500,000 900,000 600,000 1,500,000 600,000 600,000 300,000 900,000 1,500,000 1,000,000 1,200,000 600,000 1,000,000 1,500,000 1,500,000 1,200,000 600,000 600,000 750,000 600,000 900,000 900,000 900,000 600,000 900,000 750,000 750,000 300,000 900,000 300,000 450,000 450,000 450,000 600,000 600,000 900,000 600,000 300,000 600,000 900,000 600,000 600,000 600,000 1,000,000 900,000 1,000,000 800,000 600,000 900,000 1,000,000 500,000 850,000 900,000 Majingklak Majingklak Majingklak Majingklak Majingklak Majingklak Majingklak Majingklak Majingklak Majingklak Majingklak Majingklak Majingklak Majingklak Majingklak Majingklak Majingklak Majingklak Majingklak Majingklak Majingklak Majingklak Majingklak Majingklak Majingklak Majingklak Majingklak Majingklak Majingklak Majingklak Majingklak Majingklak Majingklak Majingklak Majingklak Majingklak Majingklak Majingklak Majingklak Majingklak Majingklak Majingklak Majingklak Majingklak Majingklak Majingklak Majingklak Majingklak Majingklak Majingklak Majingklak Majingklak Majingklak Majingklak Majingklak Majingklak Majingklak Cikadim Cikadim Cikadim Cikadim Cikadim Cikadim Cikadim Cikadim Cikadim Cikadim 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
Page 2
Analisis Majingklak
2. Quistioners
xv
3. Risk Maps
xvi

Risk Assessment Report in Majingklak and Ciawitali Sub-Village, Pamotan Village Ciamis District, Jawa Barat Province

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Risk Assessment Report in Majingklak and Ciawitali Sub-Village, Pamotan Village Ciamis District, Jawa Barat Province

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Report on Rapid Risk Assessment

LoR = c. Risk Level

Chapter 2 Methodology and Techniques Analysis

Data Analysis Techniques

By means of ranking system from 1 (low), 2 (moderate) and 3 (high).

Lack of Resilience a. Educations Level. b. Social Systems.

Risk = Hazard X Vulnerability

Chapter 3 Result of Risk Analysis

Profile of Majingklak and Ciawitali sub-villages

Jumlah Pendududuk Dusun Majingklak dan Ciawitali

HH 250 617 181

1000 750 500 250

Figure 1 The composition of Population based on Gender Komposisi Penduduk

20-55 y.o Majingklak

Majingklak 63 0 6 6 26 2 248 0 351

Figure 2 Compostion of populations based on aged group.

190 102 3 89 17 721

1% 18% 71% 0% 3% 11%

12% 2% 26% 31%

Government Civil Servant Traders Breeder Farmers

Labor/Private Sectors Emp Hodge Handyman Fishermen

Figure 3. Comparison of the number of livelihood.

Other supporting activities included the following:

Result of Risk Assessment in Majingklak and Ciawitali Sub-villages

Figure 4. Exposure Level

Figure 5. Fragility Level

Figure 6 Majingklak and Ciawitali Communitys Income Level

Figure 7. Comparison of the number of work force the household

Tingkat Pendapatan Masyarakat

% Tingkat Kerapuhan % Tingkat Kerentanan

Tingkat Kerapuhan Masyarakat

High Moderate Low

Majingklak Ciawitali 38.82% 22.90% Ciawitali 53.95% 71.96% 7.24% 5.14%

1.32% 12.62% 0.47%

71.96% 53.95% 38.82%

0.00% Figure 77.63% 22.37%

Kerentanan High Moderate Low

High Moderate Low Resiko High 12.15% Moderate 3.29% Low

0.00% 100.00% 0.00%

0.00% 22.43% 77.57%

53.95% 38.82% 77.63%

Majingklak Ciawitali 47.37% 0.00% 52.63% 61.21% 0.00% 38.79%

High Average Exposure

Majingklak 22.37% 7.24% Majingklak

16.36% 0.47% 7.48% Majingklak 2.34% Majingklak Ciawitali Ciawitali

Tingkat Tingkat Ketidaktahanan Masyarakat Pendidikan

Majingklak Ciawitali 77.63% 86.92% 21.05% 1.32% 12.62% 0.47%

Tingkat Resiko Masyarakat

97.20% 65.79% Tingkat Ancaman Terhadap Masyarakat 34.21%

% Tingkat Ancaman % Tingkat Kerentanan

Majingklak Ciawitali 61.84% 48.60% 28.29% 34.11% 9.87% 17.29%

Tingkat Ancaman Terhadap Masyarakat

Table 3. List of Disasters

Every year Every year

Table 4 Analysis of the Impact of Hazards on Group of livelihood

100.00% 75.00% 50.00%

High Moderate Low

100.00% 75.00% 50.00% 25.00% 0%

High Moderate Low

Figure 12. Risk per Household at Majingklak and Ciawitali sub-village.

Chapter 4 Conclution and Recommendation

1. Risk Analysis Tables