Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Summary
1.0 Abstract ..................................................................................................................................................... 3 2.0 OSHA and NFPA Rules ................................................................................................................4 3.0 Use of NFPA 70E Tables ............................................................................................................4 4.0 IEEE 1584 Analysis Procedure ..............................................................................................6 5.0 Arc Flash Labels................................................................................................................................. 7 6.0 Conclusion ............................................................................................................................................. 7 7.0 Recommended Specications: Electrical Power System Studies ......................................................................................... 8 8.0 References ............................................................................................................................................ 11
1.0 Abstract
Recent changes in workplace safety regulations have heightened the awareness of hazards associated with electrical arcs. The hazard level must be quantied and workers properly protected before entering proximity of exposed energized conductors. National Fire Protection Associations (NFPA) standard 70E provides the guidelines for work involving electrical hazards and the selection of arc ash protective equipment. In order to properly select the protective gear one must have knowledge of the potential thermal energy of the electric arc. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) standard 1584 has been the de facto standard for calculating the arc energy levels at different points in the electrical power system. However, NFPA 70E also provides the option of using the Hazard/Risk Category (HRC) task tables for personal protective equipment (PPE) selection. These tables provide pre-dened levels of PPE, which are based on the available short circuit current and the speed of the overcurrent protective device. Therefore, in order to properly apply the tables, some degree of electrical calculations must be performed and the tables could be subjected to misuse if they are applied without knowledge of the necessary calculations. In this paper the basic differences between the IEEE 1584 method and the NFPA 70E task tables are discussed and a recommended specication is provided for facility owners who are interested in achieving compliance with the regulations.
It must be noted that de-energizing equipment does not absolve the facility from the responsibility of performing the arc ash analysis or providing the necessary PPE. Both OSHA and NFPA have basic rules that prohibit energized work. In order to establish that a circuit is de-energized, the circuit must be approached to verify that it has been de-energized. Until the verication testing is completed, the circuit must be considered energized per NFPA 70E. Therefore, the worker who approaches the circuit for verication testing must wear full PPE. Hiring contractors to perform electrical work does not absolve the facility from performing the calculations and providing the arc ash exposure levels to the contractors workers.
(cont.)
approach could subject the electrical workers to either too little PPE (risk of injury) or too much PPE (risk of reduced mobility). In order to provide appropriate protection for electrical workers, the necessary calculations must be performed to establish the short circuit currents and the OCPD opening times. Only then can the NFPA 70E tables be effectively used. In fact, the NFPA 70E committee recognized the importance of these parameters and moved them from the end notes to the body of the table for the 2012 edition in order to draw attention to this important information.
Table 1
Table 1 summarizes the basic differences in methodology between the simplistic method of using NFPA 70E task tables (without performing short circuit and coordination studies) versus the IEEE 1584 method.
Specification Item
IEEE 1584 Method
Yes
Establish all modes of operation Establish available fault current at each piece of equipment under study (short circuit study)* Determine arcing fault current for each piece of equipment under study
Yes
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
(1) Incorrect application of the task tables without evaluating short circuit currents and OCPD opening times * The short circuit study establishes the available fault current. The NFPA 70E task tables 130.7(C)(15)(a) will provide estimates of the PPE hazard risk category, but they cannot be used properly without knowing the available fault current and clearing time.
Determine incident energy (calories per 2 CM ) for each piece of equipment under study Document system voltages and classes of equipment
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
The work shall be overseen by registered professional engineers (P.E.) The work shall identify opportunities to improve code compliance and over-dutied equipment and make recommendations on strategies to reduce high arc flash hazard levels (time-current coordination study)
Yes
Unknown
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
! DANGER
HAZARD OF ELECTRIC SHOCK, EXPLOSION OR ARC FLASH
Apply appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) and follow safe electrical work practices. See NFPA 70E. This equipment must be installed and serviced only by qualified electrical personnel. Turn off all power supplying this equipment before working on or inside equipment. Always use a properly rated voltage sensing device to confirm power is off. Replace all devices, doors and covers before turning on power to this equipment.
6.0 Conclusion
In order to correctly apply the NFPA 70E Hazard/Risk Category task tables, knowledge of the available short circuit current and the opening time of the overcurrent protective device is required. A common misapplication of the tables occurs when they are applied solely based on the class of equipment and the system voltage. This results in an incomplete hazard evaluation and PPE that may be too little or too much. The IEEE 1584 method, however, is a systematic approach which calculates the exact arc ash energies from the electrical power system parameters. Schneider Electric Engineering Services (SEES) recommends a complete data collection from the power system in order to generate short circuit and coordination studies in addition to arc ash energy calculations. Our recommended specication for arc ash studies is provided in the next section.
Part 2: Product
2.01 Manufacturers A. The specied electrical power system studies shall be performed by Schneider Electric Engineering Services or approved equal. 2.02 Electrical Power System Studies A. Power System Data Collection 1. Power system data collection shall be performed by or under the direction of a professional engineer. 2. Complete data shall be obtained from The power sources (utility, generator or UPS) Impedance components such as transformers, cable and busway Overcurrent protective devices such as fuses, circuit breakers and relays Equipment short circuit ratings B. Short Circuit Analysis 1. Calculation of the maximum root mean square (rms) symmetrical three-phase short-circuit current at each signicant location in the electrical system shall be made using a digital computer. 2. Appropriate motor short-circuit contribution shall be included at the appropriate locations in the system so that the computer calculated values represent the highest short-circuit current the equipment will be subjected to under fault conditions. 3. A tabular computer printout shall be included which lists the calculated short-circuit currents, X/R ratios, equipment short-circuit interrupting or withstand current ratings, and notes regarding the adequacy or inadequacy of the equipment.
12. The data elds on the label shall be populated from the results of the Arc Flash Hazard Analysis. Where circuits have been omitted from the computer model as permitted by an applicable industry standard a generic label shall be provided.
8.0 References
1. Occupational Safety and Health Standards, 29CFR, Part 1910, Subpart S, Electrical, Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) 2. Standard for Electrical Safety in the Workplace, NFPA 70E - 2012, National Fire Protection Association (NFPA), Quincy, MA 3. IEEE Guide for Performing Arc-Flash Hazard Calculations, IEEE Standard 1584 2002, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, New York, NY 4. Update of Field Analysis of Arc Flash Incidents, PPE Protective Performance and Related Work Injuries, Doan, Hoagland and Neal, IEEE IAS Electrical Safety Workshop, February 1-5, 2010, Memphis, TN