Kal Korff

Why the God Particle Really Isnt

by Kal K. Korff
Internationally Syndicated Copyright 2012 by Kal K. Korff - ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

The discovery of the Higgs-Boson particle, if it is eventually nally conrmed, is undeniably a milestone breakthrough in the understanding of particle physics and matter itself. Unfortunately, the lamestream media has dubbed the HB "the God particle," falsely implying two things: 1. There is no supernatural or supreme entity popularly called "God" by implication of the discovery of the HB; 2. "God" is not "needed" now as an explanation for our existence. Thanks to the HB particle, the entire universe can automagically create and then assemble itself. These two notions are pure delusional nonsense. Before I prove it, let me state for the record that I know about physics, especially quantum physics, which is the study of the relationship of particles, especially sub-atomic ones, to each other. Decades ago, I built a scientically accurate nuclear bomb design, received a prize in a science contest for it, and later worked at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) in the USA in the elds of computing and in their "Star Wars" anti-missile defense program and often did work in the ofce of Dr. Edward Teller, the inventor of the Hydrogen bomb. LLNL is one of the world's most prestigious nuclear research facilities. The press wrote stories about not only my atomic bomb project, but also because I had been hired to work at the lab, initially starting on what was then a new concept, hypermedia. Fast forward now to the discovery of the HB particle. It has nothing to do with the issue of "God," anymore than the existence of a simple electron does.

Indeed, the rst problem people who spread this myth must face is how to explain how the HB automagically got there? Who or what created it? Even science admits it did not "create" itself. The fact is, the discovery of the HB, if it is veried, does not "close the door on physics." If anything, its conrmation opens a whole new series of doors, the total number of which we may never completely discover nor ever be able to fully comprehend. Unfortunately, people let their egos mislead them to believe that they are capable of understanding everything. This is not true, and it never will be. There is an absolute limit to what is essentially human capability, understanding and comprehension, however formidable it might be. Every life form has its limits, period. To cite some real examples, a dog cannot see in color. Humans cannot hear as well as dogs. Humans cannot see a rabbit on the ground with their unaided eyes from a distance of four miles away, but a hawk can. Pigs cannot y, even if you push them out of a window. The false claim that the "God" particle "disproves" the existence of God is fueled by the liberal media and those who trend towards atheism and human arrogance. These types amaze me, their entire premise is that something can come from nothing. They "forget" that nothing means nothing, that zero is zero. The very idea that something can come from nothing isn't even logically possible. It is like saying that zero is really one. No it's not, zero is zero. There's a reason the concept of zero exists, because zero means nothing and it represents nothing. Now, if we ignore the obvious problem by "thinking" that the entire universe and even our existence came from nothing, there is the additional issue of evolution itself. According to the lamestream media, Charles Darwin said that men came from apes. This is a blatant lie. Nowhere in any of Darwin's writings does he ever make this claim. While he did say that at one point there seems to have been a common ancestor, this is not the same thing as "coming from."

Copyright 2012 by Kal K. Korff - ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. No part of this content may be reproduced in any form nor by any means without the express, written consent of Kal Korff. Fair use, does NOT apply. By reading this document, you willingly agree to be legally bound by its terms and conditions. Violators of this policy will have a felony DMCA Copyright infringement notice filed against them with law enforcement. First time offenders may be fined up to $500,000, imprisoned for five years, or both. For repeat offenders, the maximum penalty increases to a fine of $1,000,000, imprisonment for up to ten years, or both. This is a DMCA protected document, illegal copying and/or reproduction of its contents are tracked on the Internet and reported to law enforcement for felony prosecution.

In fact, when Darwin was asked repeatedly how life got here in the rst place, how it was created, he admitted that he had no idea. He was honest and humble concerning this point. This is another inconvenient fact that is hardly ever mentioned. Now let's briey look at the issue of evolution itself. According to the lamestream media, it completely "destroys" the idea of the existence of "God" entirely. In reality, it does no such thing. Whenever I debate self-proclaimed "atheists," I always offer them this challenge: Imagine you have a junkyard as big as you want, full of anything you want, containing as much as you want, for as long as you want. Whatever you want in this junkyard, you can have it, even in unlimited quantities, as long as none of it is organic or alive. Remember, everything which exists, whether it is a living organism or not, has at least one purpose. Nothing exists just for the heck of it. Everything organic and inorganic object, regardless of what it is, has electrons, neutrons and protons. I then ask atheists a simple question: How many years do I have to watch this theoretical junkyard before a Boeing 747 automagically assembles itself, rises up and ies away? Predictably, they cannot answer this question, even though the answer could not be more obvious: the answer is never, it will never happen! Although a Boeing airplane is made of only non-living parts, it cannot automagically assemble itself, nor will it ever change itself into a living organism. Even an atheist will admit this fact. While scientists are working on machines which can replicate themselves, they have to be programmed by their creators to do so. There's that pesky word atheists hate, "creator." If God exists, God is obviously The Great Creator, the greatest in fact. After an atheists unks trying to answer this simple question, ask them how something can come from nothing? If they're honest, they will admit that it cannot. While things DO evolve after they exist, a very real problem exists in the fossil records which have been found by scientists.

Copyright 2012 by Kal K. Korff - ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. No part of this content may be reproduced in any form nor by any means without the express, written consent of Kal Korff. Fair use, does NOT apply. By reading this document, you willingly agree to be legally bound by its terms and conditions. Violators of this policy will have a felony DMCA Copyright infringement notice filed against them with law enforcement. First time offenders may be fined up to $500,000, imprisoned for five years, or both. For repeat offenders, the maximum penalty increases to a fine of $1,000,000, imprisonment for up to ten years, or both. This is a DMCA protected document, illegal copying and/or reproduction of its contents are tracked on the Internet and reported to law enforcement for felony prosecution.

Millions of fossils have been unearthed so far. So many of them have been discovered, that entire complete pictures can now be formed where it concerns key parts of reconstructing Earth's past. The problem which has now become obvious is the fact that science keeps nding fossils which are entirely completely evolved and show perfectly formed creatures. This includes their internal organs. Most of these became fossilized by accident. No life form which has ever existed said to itself, "I'm going to die and become a fossil for science to eventually discover me." Unfortunately for atheists, we have no fossil records of any of those pesky "in between" creatures. There are no fossils of a giraffe fossilized while in the middle of becoming a zebra. The distinct absence of these "I'm evolving into a whatever" fossils is a very real problem for atheists. It is a certainty that by now, scientists would have found at least one of these miraculous wonders, yet they never have. Instead, they always nd complete entities or life forms, fossilized as they were at the time, completely developed and whole. Several years ago in Prague, I attended a meeting of the International Astronomical Society. The purpose of this gathering was to decide whether or not to reclassify the planet Pluto as a planetoid instead of being a true planet. During the conference, I asked top scientists there whether or not they believed in the existence of God. To my surprise, every one of them said they do! When I asked why, they unanimously claimed that it was their study of the structure of matter which convinced them that it has been intelligently designed. They also cited the Big Bang theory itself, which has been incorrectly touted by the lamestream media as being "evidence" that God does not exist. As one Astronomer told me, "So all of a sudden, BOOM! The universe as we know it begins. That sounds like creation to me, especially since it had to ultimately come from nothing, and something cannot come from nothing, without a creator of some kind." Ditto for the HB particle. End of Part I

Copyright 2012 by Kal K. Korff - ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. No part of this content may be reproduced in any form nor by any means without the express, written consent of Kal Korff. Fair use, does NOT apply. By reading this document, you willingly agree to be legally bound by its terms and conditions. Violators of this policy will have a felony DMCA Copyright infringement notice filed against them with law enforcement. First time offenders may be fined up to $500,000, imprisoned for five years, or both. For repeat offenders, the maximum penalty increases to a fine of $1,000,000, imprisonment for up to ten years, or both. This is a DMCA protected document, illegal copying and/or reproduction of its contents are tracked on the Internet and reported to law enforcement for felony prosecution.

The Big Bang theory aside, we now come to some inconvenient truths concerning the mechanics of life itself, including its intricacies. When one objectively studies numerous species and how they managed to automagically "adapt" according to atheists, one is compelled towards the conclusion that there must be some overall, interconnected intelligent design. If there is an intelligent, deliberate design, then this means there must be a "creator" - an entity we call "God." Let's objectively look at just a few examples. The Acacia tree is an amazing life form. Its seeds, just like those of many plants, cannot be digested by stomach acid. This means that when an animal eats it, travels and then eventually excrements the seeds it has consumed, they will fall to the ground. Since they already exist in the animal's feces, the Acacia seed has everything it needs to grow and prosper and reproduce. Manure is great fertilizer. It's amazing how nature "engineered" things this way. In examining the Acacia tree, an obvious series of questions arise, all of which are wholly valid from an objective standpoint. Just exactly how does the Acacia "know" to make its seeds resistant to digestive stomach acids? If it did not do this, they would be destroyed and the plant could not reproduce. How does it even "know," if it "knows," that stomach acids exist, let alone how to "engineer itself" to be able to resist them? Atheists, naturally, have no answer for this. The DNA of the Acacia plant has been completely sequenced. Nowhere is there a gene that says, "I need to reproduce. I cannot have sex, so I will just make my seeds, which need to be spread far and wide for me to survive as a species, strong enough to resist the corrosive powers of stomach acids so that I can be consumed, pooped out of some animal, and then I can grow and reproduce in their excrement." Even IF a gene which could "gure all of this out" were to be found by science in the Acacia plant, exactly HOW this plant would automagically "just know" that it needed to do this is yet another problem for atheists. Naturally, they cannot explain it. The existence of plants presents real problems for atheists. Exactly HOW does a plant "just know" that it must produce pollen or nectar to be attractive to insects for it to be visited or of interest in the rst place?

Copyright 2012 by Kal K. Korff - ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. No part of this content may be reproduced in any form nor by any means without the express, written consent of Kal Korff. Fair use, does NOT apply. By reading this document, you willingly agree to be legally bound by its terms and conditions. Violators of this policy will have a felony DMCA Copyright infringement notice filed against them with law enforcement. First time offenders may be fined up to $500,000, imprisoned for five years, or both. For repeat offenders, the maximum penalty increases to a fine of $1,000,000, imprisonment for up to ten years, or both. This is a DMCA protected document, illegal copying and/or reproduction of its contents are tracked on the Internet and reported to law enforcement for felony prosecution.

Exactly what does a plant "think," if anything? Is it something along the lines of, "I am a plant. I cannot have sex. I am neither male nor female, but I must reproduce. Therefore I will make a yellow substance called pollen which will be of interest to insects. They will visit me and collect this pollen and spread it to other owers so that I can reproduce. For those who don't like pollen, I will make sweet nectar instead, I will automagically create whatever substance I need to, to adapt and service. Not only will I do this, I will get it right, nail it down so perfectly, that insects and even birds will just 'love' me." Of course, plants cannot do this. Even atheists will admit this obvious fact, yet this is exactly what would be required to "explain" the existence, evolution and characteristics of plants and how they function if we exclude the notion of a creator. Somehow, plants managed to automagically gure all of this stuff out. They're smarter than Einstein, even though they have no brains. They know about birds, they know about bees, and they specically know what these creatures like and do not like, and they also "just know" their ight characteristics and general behavior. Of course, in the real world, they do not. Even an atheist will admit this, which of course automatically destroys their very premise. The Acacia plant is not alone, it is just one of countless examples. Fruits which exist on trees, are obviously designed to be consumed. Birds eat them, insects eat them, humans eat them, yet the fruit itself and the size of it are not necessary to contain the seeds that it does. If fruits were meant to just serve as a simple "house" for seeds, they would be much smaller. Yet look at the size of a watermelon, an apple, or a grapefruit. Very little of the fruit is actually the seed part, over 90% of it is an enticing meal. Even the colors of plants are also an inconvenient truth for atheists. Just exactly how do plants "automagically know" that by being bright colored, they will attract a greater number of birds and insects to do their bidding? How do plants even "know" what a color is? Are plants busy studying the behavior and reactions to colors that birds and insects have? After they gure it out, do they then call upon their "let's be this color gene" and change all of a sudden? Of course they do not.

Copyright 2012 by Kal K. Korff - ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. No part of this content may be reproduced in any form nor by any means without the express, written consent of Kal Korff. Fair use, does NOT apply. By reading this document, you willingly agree to be legally bound by its terms and conditions. Violators of this policy will have a felony DMCA Copyright infringement notice filed against them with law enforcement. First time offenders may be fined up to $500,000, imprisoned for five years, or both. For repeat offenders, the maximum penalty increases to a fine of $1,000,000, imprisonment for up to ten years, or both. This is a DMCA protected document, illegal copying and/or reproduction of its contents are tracked on the Internet and reported to law enforcement for felony prosecution.

To be an atheist means that one "thinks" that something comes from nothing. It means that you "think" that all life forms automagically know and understand what they must become, and then they set about producing or using the miracle genes necessary to achieve their planned and thoroughly thought through objectives, even though such genes after being completely sequenced and identied by science do not exist. The very idea that life forms can "will themselves" into becoming whatever they think is needed, is arguably delusional. If you don't believe me, try "willing yourself" into growing wings and being able to y. It's never going to happen. Reality doesn't work this way. END 1.0v1 July 11, 2012 Kal K. Korff is an officially accredited internationally known author, columnist and investigative journalist.

Copyright 2012 by Kal K. Korff - ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. No part of this content may be reproduced in any form nor by any means without the express, written consent of Kal Korff. Fair use, does NOT apply. By reading this document, you willingly agree to be legally bound by its terms and conditions. Violators of this policy will have a felony DMCA Copyright infringement notice filed against them with law enforcement. First time offenders may be fined up to $500,000, imprisoned for five years, or both. For repeat offenders, the maximum penalty increases to a fine of $1,000,000, imprisonment for up to ten years, or both. This is a DMCA protected document, illegal copying and/or reproduction of its contents are tracked on the Internet and reported to law enforcement for felony prosecution.