Professional Documents
Culture Documents
35.0
33,8%
% on GDP
France
25.0 25,4% 20.0 Germany United Kingdom Spain OECD Total 15.0
10.0
5.0
0.0
2010
1965
1975
1985
1995
2000
2005
2008
2009
Over the last 15 years, Italy has performed the second most dramatic rise in tax levy in Europe (after Cyprus).
+3,1 (+ 7,75%)
+1,4 (+3,5%) +0,2 (+0,57%) -0,1 (-0,25%) -1,1 (-2,57%) -2,2 (-5,25%) -2,3 (-7%) -3,5 (-10,32%) Italy Germany France Spain United Kingdom EU-27 -1 (-2,53%)
-1,8 (-5,15%)
-2,5 (-5,66%)
-2,1 (-5,19%)
Taxation trends in the European Union, Annex A, by the European Commission - Taxation and Customs Union Eurostat, 2011.
indirect taxes
direct taxes extraordinary capital gains taxes Social contributions "effettivi" social contributions "figurativi"
0.0 2008
1990 1995 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2009 2010
2011
2012
Source: Italian Bureau of Statistics (Istat) [www.istat.it]; Italian Court of Audit (Corte dei Conti) [President speech before the Italian Chamber of Deputies, 13 March 2012, page 3]
Forecasting Italian Tax Burden for the upcoming years: gloomy expectations
Sources: Confindustria, Scenari economici, 2011 Banca dItalia (Bank of Italy,), Audizione preliminare sulla legge di stabilit 2012 Cgia Mestre (Association of small sized enterprises of Mestre, Venice) ,
www.cgiamestre.com
45.50% 45.10%
45%
44%
44%
43.80%
43.59%
42.50%
42.70%
42.56%
Cgia Mestre
Banca d'Italia
Eutekne
120
100 85,9% 84,3% 80,9% 63,3% 60 55,6% 55,4% 51,2% 68,3% Italy Germany France Spain United Kingdom
80 % GDP
40
20
0 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
Despite efforts on reducing the Italian government debt, the latter is expected to increase by 3,7% (2011-2013), the second highest in the World after Spain (+11,2%).
Source: Eurostat database; Eurostat interim report 2012; IMF, Fiscal Monitor-Balancing Fiscal Policy Risks, 2012
120
100
80
% on GDP
Public Debt 60 41,3% 41,0% 40,5% 41,0% 40,4% 40,1% 41,7% 42,7% 42,6% 42,8% 42,3% 40 Total tax burden on GDP (%)
20
0 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
Source: Istat
115
100
97 95 90 85 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
Spain, 100
Source: Eurostat
- 22,8% of profit is spent in profits taxes; - 43,4% in labour taxes; -2,3% in other taxes. France has a similar tax rate, arising to 65,7%, whilst Germany has a total tax rate of 46,7% and UK and Spain boast much lighter ratios, around 37-39%. The EU average amounts to 43,4%, the World average 44,8%.
10
The table outlines the trends in the composition of tax revenue (calculated as a percentage on GDP).
% on GDP
15,4% 15
14
13,9% 13,8%
13
Direct taxes
12
Indirect taxes
11
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
Source: Taxation Trends in the European Union, the 2011 report drafted by the European Commission- Taxation and Customs Union.
Social contributions
10
11
10
9,1*
(billions)
8 6.4 6 4.4 4
6.9 total revenue from Tax Administration activity (*2009 data includes 577 millions of state aid repayment)
12
Total n Large taxpayers Middle-sized enterprises Small-sized enterprises- self employed Individuals 2.763 16.080 178.263 500.142
697.248
30.433
* : figures only relate to taxes which have been challenged by the competent authorities (no reference is made to revenue collected) Source: Italian Revenue Agency (Agenzia delle Entrate), Evasion clawback: 2011 outcomes, 29 March 2012: www.agenziaentrate.gov.it
13
Individuals 27%
Revenue (million )* Large taxpayers Middle-sized enterprises Small enterprises-self employed 1.711 579 1.361 1.468 399
Individuals Registry
* : figures do not include taxes which have been registered in the tax collection rolls (tributi iscritti a ruolo), i.e. taxes in connection to which a tax collection procedure has been initiated by the competent authorities
Source: Italian Revenue Agency (Agenzia delle Entrate), Evasion clawback: 2011 outcomes, 29 March 2012: www.agenziaentrate.gov.it
14
22.004 10.164
The table shows the dramatic soar in tax litigation over the last decade before the Commissioni Tributarie Provinciali (first instance) and Regionali (Court of Appeal).
Despite the growth of filings, the pace of the decision-making has dropped.
15
Source: Ministero dellEconomia e delle Finanze, Consiglio di Presidenza della Giustizia Tributaria, Relazione 2008 e 2009
Tax Litigation in Italy-2 - claims and decisions by Second Instance Tax Courts
Claims filed before the Second Instance Tax Courts
70000 63.319 60000 100000
50000
total amount
80000
total amount
60000
45.048 40000 20000 20000 10000 5.297 2.134 0 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Whole Italy Lombardy 7.789 2.939 0 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 9198 2387 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 9.166 4.224
Source: Ministero dellEconomia e delle Finanze, Consiglio di Presidenza della Giustizia Tributaria, Relazione 2008 e 2009
Tuscany
16
92%
Agenzia delle Entrate (Tax Administration) Agenzia del Territorio ( Land Registry) Enti Locali (Local authorities) Others Public Administration Taxpayer
Agenzia delle Entrate (Tax Administration) Agenzia del Territorio ( Land Registry) Enti Locali (Local authorities) Others Public Administration Taxpayer
Source: Ministero dellEconomia e delle Finanze, Consiglio di Presidenza della Giustizia Tributaria, Relazione 2009
17
Regional tax on productive activities (IRAP) applies in addition to corporate income tax and is levied at the standard rate of 3,9%, increased to 4,65% for banks and 5,90% for insurance companies. Regions are entitled to modify the standard rate by up to 0,92%.
18
Italy: 57,22%
France: 60,73%; Germany: 48,54%; UK: 41,41%; Spain: 32,47%.
19
20
bad debts)
Revising rules on cross-border operations:
tax residence; CFC rules;
New rules on tax deduction of tax depreciation installments, general expenses, and on the definition of costs related to the business activity.
21
22
abuse of law = misuse of provisions of law in order to benefit from an undue tax saving;
the abusive behaviour is characterised by the predominant purpose of profiting from fiscal benefits; no abuse of law if the operation is grounded on non-negligible extra-fiscal reasons (including when
the operation does not give rise to immediate revenues for the taxpayer, being motivated by
organisational needs); tax administration is required proving the abusive scheme and the way it is applied, duly motivating the measure inflicted;