Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Abortion Industry
Economic Policies:
Part Two
kill
and sophisticated
The ‘Life’ Other /
“Successful”
Boat People’s
Reasons
Why
Clause A
Emotional
Reasons
Religious Why
Extenuating
Circumstance B
Reasons
Why Be flexible
will ya’ !
Clause A? “Our currency / Our
Rules”: The fine print..
Item 1: You rent the ideology and its definition of money
from us and pay in children. We tell you what you owe
and when you owe it. We set the schedule of baby
killing.
Really.
BioHazard
You have lost in a poker match to an
ideology that is itself a lie if you have killed
your own seed on the behalf of that
ideology or its economic policies. Your
government is funding, with your taxes,
the killing of children all over the world on
the identical economic theory that has not
worked here or anywhere.
The whole time you were inside the lie, real justice
was going on; real truth that you were in
absolute warfare against because you were
deceived.
The fact that you were deceived does not
change what happened. You can’t get your
children back. You can’t get out of the side
effects of the contraceptives.
Your children.
A failed economic theory of life:
..yet again, without any secret police
..for no gain
whatsoever
But these days they have trained
you to ask, not “where are my
children?”
But: “Where
is my
job?”
as if you should thank them that fewer and
fewer of you physically exist to contribute
to a large economy that needs their help.
..even as they continue to promise more
benefits in return for less American
children in the United States and all
children outside of the United States.
New Life in the Death and Life
Christ
Isn’t it time to think outside the box of the
failed promises of the contraception and
abortion industries?
..to stop the automatic “Christ wants me to be
poor, ridiculed and have nothing!” of the
contraceptive and abortion industry economic
‘wisdom’ in order to make it seem that their
version of Christ, the ‘Christ’ that has no problem
with killing children, will make you rich in their
economic theories?