building By- Kalpesh Patel SD0308 Index Introduction to transfer beam Study on shear capacity of RC beam Experimental Programme Material properties Test Procedure Test Result And Discussion Conclusions What is Transfer beam?
To provide for functional requirement of large column free space in high rise building ,the RC column are placed at the periphery of the built-up plan area.
With a view to developing high flexural and torsional stiffness ,these column are very closely spaced and connected through very stiff beam ,called as Spandrel beam. These closely spaced columns at the periphery, however, pose hindrance to the movement of people and the goods at the ground floor and basement levels.
To fulfill this requirement , the columns at these floor levels have to be placed at larger spacing.
As a result an interface has to be provided between the closely spaced columns of the upper floor and the widely spaced columns at the ground or basement level. This interface has to be a horizontal RC element and , hence, is referred as Beam.
Conventionally , a beam is taken to be a flexural member of the structural system. The above mentioned interface beam, dose not behave as a flexural member ,since it gets sandwiched between closely spaced upper columns and a little widely spaced supporting columns below it.
Also to transfer the high magnitude of loads collected from all the upper floor of a high-rise building , the depth of the interface beam has to kept much higher than the conventional beams , ranging from 1 m to 4.5 m.
As the result of this , the load transfer mechanism through this beam becomes altogether different from the conventional mechanism of flexure , and failure of such beam is in brittle mode.
Such a beam is referred to as TRASFER BEAM
It is therefore , required to generate the shear capacity of transfer beams.
Figure shows a 25 storey building having Transfer beam of 1.7 m depth provided at ground floor level to create a space for free movement of people and for parking purpose.
In spite of its wide structural application , only a few national codes include their design.
For example , the British standard BS 8110 for structural use of concrete explicitly state that, for the design of deep beams , reference to be made to specialist literature
Similarly,Euro-2 for design of concrete structure state that it is not apply to the deep beam.
Consequently, there is no specific , unified , and rational design procedure available in the codes of these countries.
I describe the experimental studies conducted on beam of different depth to investigate the effect of depth on shear capacity of transfer beam in high rise buildings. Study on shear capacity of RC beam What is shear span? it is the horizontal distance between load on top of beam and support. The study on beam related to varying shear- span to depth ratio (a/d) has been carried out by varying the depth (d) and not by varying the shear span (a).
This has been done to achieve flow of applied load through the entire depth of body of concrete.
This allows the concrete to develop stress over the full depth of beam which varies non-linearly across the depth.
This aspect is very distinct, important and relevant from view points of the structural response of the beams.
It is to be particularly noted that the same value of a/d can be attained by varying the shear span (a) which is easy to implement since it simply demands shifting of the top loading points toward the supports.
This way of varying the shear span-to-depth ratio dose not result in the true structural response as in a deep beam to be used as a transfer beam.
The failure patterns are significantly different in the two sets of beams , one obtained by varying the depth (d) , and second by varying the shear-span (a) having the same a/d ratio.
The primary objective of the research is to build-up shear resisting capacity in RC beams by increasing the depth.
Experimental Programme Shear strength of concrete is evaluated experimentally.
This is so primarily due to interlocking of the coarse aggregates among themselves.
As a result of particle interlocking , it is not feasible to apply a shearing action ( direct shearing force) in a plane , as is customarily done in the case of metals.
Experiments have to be , therefore , devised to indirectly asses the shear strength of concrete. In one of the popularly adopted devices, a beam of appropriate length is subjected to shearing and bending action under 4 points loading system (2- active and 2-passive forces) as shown in fig.
Beam subjected to be constant shear is refereed to as shear span , which offers itself to be studied for performance under shear , bending being negligible for short shear span.
In the present study, such a device has been adopted to study the performance of concrete under direct shearing action.
Once steel bars are introduction generally along a direction perpendicular to shearing force , these bars start coming in to action to resist shearing force.
Thus , steel bars becomes essential linked to resisting shearing force along with the inherent concrete resistance.
The shear resistance due to these longitudinal steel bars is commonly referred as dowel effect.
The primary design variable was depth in term of shear span-to-depth ratio.
The study aims to investigation the effect of depth of beams in terms of shear span-to-depth ratio on shear strength of concrete. Material properties
The test specimens were cast using cement , fine aggregate, coarse aggregate , water and susperplasticizer. The materials, in general, conformed to the specification laid down in the relevant Indian Standard Codes. For grading of fine and coarse aggregate , sieve analysis was carried out. Cement:
ordinary portland cement of 43-grade conforming to IS:8112:1989 was used throughout the experimental work.
All test were carried out as per IS:4031-1988
The specific gravity and finess respective were 3.14 and 275 m2/kg
Coarse aggregate:
Crushed granite obtained from a local source was used as coarse aggregate and maximum size used was 20 mm along with 10 mm size.
Fine aggregate:
Locally available sand was used as fine aggregate. The specific gravity was 2.6 and fineness modulus was 2.29.
Superplasticizer :
A modified melamine based highly effective high range water reducing concrete admixture was used throughout the investigation. It was dark brown in colour having 1.22 specific gravity.
Reinforcing steel rebar:
Thermo mechanically treated (TMT) rebar of Fe 415 grade was used. Concrete Mix Design The concrete mix were designed in accordance with the Indian standard recommended method of concrete mix design (IS 10262 1982).
The concrete mix table was prepared for 400kg/m3 cement content. Table-1: Concrete Mix properties Sr. No. Description Value 1 Cube compressive strenth (MPa) 43.00 2 Cement (kg) 24.50 3 Fine Aggregate (Send) (kg) 44.50 4 Coarse Aggregate (kg) 81.00 5 Water - Cement Ratio 0.32 6 Water (Litres) 7.80 7 Plasticizer as % of wt. of cement 0.85 8 Mix Proportion 1:1.82:3.31 Test specimen
Twelve specimens were designed and fabricated. The span of beam kept constant at 1 m with 0.1 m overhanging on either side of the supports.
The spacing between the top two pointsloads has been kept at 200 mm as shown in fig . The depth of the beam varied at 150 , 200, 250, 300, 350, and 400 mm to achieve desired six shear span to depth ratio (a/d ratios).
All beam were rectangular in cross section, 100 mm wide .
Standard cubes (150 mm X 150 mm X 150 mm), cylinder (150 mm X 300 mm), were cast with each mix to know the various mechanical properties of concrete. Test Procedure After 28 days curing period, the beam specimens were removed from the curing tank and both sides of the beam were white-washed to aid observation of crack development during testing.
Load was applied gradually with the help of jack and deflection of proving ring was recorded to find the failure load.
All the beams were tested to failure under four-point loading test set-up (2-active, 2-passive) as shown in fig- The cube specimens were tested for compressive strength, the cylinder specimens for split tensile strength. Crack in beam
Test Result And Discussion
The result obtained from the experimental investigation are shown in table-2.
All beam specimens failed in shear i.e. a sudden failure without warning , loud noise at failure with the appearance of single shear crack in the shear span and fine flexural cracks in the middle portion of the beam.
The shear crack crosses the compression zone of the beam. Figure shows typical crack pattern for RC beam specimens of different a/d ratio. 1.for depth D=150 mm
2.for depth D=200 mm
3.for depth D=250 mm 4.for depth D=300 mm
5.for depth D=350 mm
6.for depth D=400 mm
From, the result obtained , the effect of depth of beam in term of shear spantodepth ratio on shear strength of concrete are analyzed and discussed as follows. Effect of depth of beams in terms of shear span-to-depth (a/d) ratio
The shear strength of concrete beams for different depths at 28 days curing age and the variation of shear strength with different shear span-to-depth ratio is shown in table-2.
It is evident from the plots that high shear strength is developed at lower value of span-to-depth ratio and the shear strength decreases at higher value of span-to- depth ratio. 0.75 1.25 1.75 2.25 2.75 0.25 1.1 1.23 1.45 1.78 2.29 3.2 Shear span to depth ratio
S h e a r
s t r e s s
( M P a )
Figure shows the effect of shear span-to-depth ratio on nominal shear stress at diagonal cracking , which is obtained by dividing measured failure load to the nominal cross sectional area (bXd).
As the shear span-to-depth (a/d) ratio decreases, the shear strength increases .
The increase in shear strength is significant in RC beam specimens with a/d ratio less than about 1.78 (AI- 0.8/1.10, AII-0.8/1.23 , AIII-0.8/1.45) , because a significant portion of the shear is transmitted directly to the support by an inclined strut.
This mechanism is frequently referred to as arch action and the magnitude of direct load transfer increases with decreasing a/d ratio.
The shear strength of RC beam with a/d ratio less than 1.78 is higher than those of RC beam with a/d ratio more than 1.78.
This result is due to the beneficial effect of direct load transfer to the support by arch action or so called strut- and-tie load transfer mechanism.
The transition point between the arch action and beam action ( or transfer beam and normal beams) lies between a/d ratio 1.45 to 1.78.
Either side of this a/d ratio , behaviors of RC beams in term of load resisting mechanism , failure pattern and the noise at failure , were entirely different. Conclusions
The primary objective of the research was to built-up shear resisting capacity in beam by increasing the depth of the experimental result and the nature of variation of shear strength against independent parameters , the following broad conclusions are arrived at:
1.shear resisting capacity of beam significantly depends upon the shear span-to depth ratio (a/d)
Beam with higher value of a/d (a/d > 1.8) exhibit increasing influence of moment and hence develop flexural shear crack in the tension zone.
Such beam may be categorized as normal beams (flexural beams) and have a/d ratio in excess of 1.8
2.shear resisting capacity of beam in the lower range of a/d ratio (a/d <1.8) shows non-linear increase.
A transition range , shear capacity increases rapidly with gradual disappearance of flexural cracks .
The beams fail in sudden splitting mode with increasing loud sound. Sudden splitting with loud sound is a measure of brittleness.
This may be taken as a transition zone between a normal beam and a deep beam.
3.beams with a/d<1.5 are observed to possess very rapidly increasing shear resistance capacity
Failure patterns are very different suggesting new mechanism to look for in the process of building-up shear capacity.
This is of particular interest since transfer beam fall in this rang of a/d ratio.
While the beam shows very high shear resistance , they tend to fail in highly brittle mode.
This mode is characterized by sudden failure in shear with very loud sound .
This mode of failure is considered undesirable and is branded as treacherous.
References:
Building code requirement for structural concrete and commentary (ACI-318)
Structure use of concrete-part 1:code of practice for design and construction (BS-8110)
Civil engineering and construction review magazine.