Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Performance objective A
Strategic
Reconciliation
Operations
Resources
OPERATIONS
STRATEGY
Market
Requirements
The technological
specification of its
product/service?
PRODUCT/SERVICE
TECHNOLOGY
MARKETING
The way it positions
itself in its market?
OPERATIONS
The way it produces its
goods and services?
PRODUCT / SERVICE
TECHNOLOGY
OPERATIONS
MARKETING
PRODUCT
SERVICE
TECHNOLOGY
PRODUCT / SERVICE
TECHNOLOGY
MARKETING
OPERATIONS
MARKETING
OPERATIONS
STRATEGIES OF VOLKSWAGENWERK
1920 - 1992
BEFORE 1948
FERDINAND PORSHE - PEOPLES CAR 1920s
GOVERNMENT SUPPORT 1934 - PLANT ON STREAM
1939
1939 WAR - PLANT TURNED TO PRODUCTION OF WAR VEHICLES
1948 NORDHOFF PUT IN CHARGE
1948
NORDHOFF TAKES HALF A STRATEGY - PEOPLES CAR
ADDS EMHPASIS ON QUALITY, TECHNICAL, EXPORT, SERVICE STANDARDS
1949 - 1958
INTENDED STRATEGY REALIZED
CAR IDEAL FOR POST WAR CONDITIONS
RAPID EXPANSION IN VOLUME
NO NEW MODELS (WORK ON NEW MODEL HALTED IN 1954)
1959
INCREASED COMPETITION AND CHANGES IN TASTES
RESPONSE - INCREASED ADVERTISING
- DESIGN STARTED FOR 1500
ORIGINAL STRATEGY UNCHANGED IN ESSENTIALS
1960 - 1964
1500 MODEL INTRODUCED
SALES INCREASED BUT PROFITS SQUEEZED
1965 - 1975
PRESSURES OF COMPETITION BECOME SEVERE
NEW STRATEGY FROM AUDI - FRONT WHEELED DRIVE, STYLISH,
WATERCOOLED
OTHER LINES DROPPED
PRODUCTION RATIONALISED ON WORLD BASIS
MARKETING EMPHASISED PERFORMANCE, RELIABILITY AND SERVICE
1976 - 1989
GOLF ESTABLISHED AS MARKET LEADER
CONTINUED EMPHASIS ON TECHNICAL EXCELLENCE
OLD DESIGNS PERIODICALLY FASHIONABLE
MAIN EUROPEAN COMPETITOR SEEN AS FIAT
SOME PRESSURE FROM JAPANESE MANUFACTURING
Nigel Slack and Michael Lewis 2003
1990 - 1996
INCREASING PRESSSURE ON COSTS FROM JAPANESE MANUFACTURERS
GERMAN LABOUR COSTS AND EXCHANGE RATE ARE DISADVANTAGEOUS
LATTERLY EUROPEAN RECESSION INCREASES PRESSURE
COST CUTTING MEASURES - EAST EUROPEAN PLANT - AGGRESSIVE
PURCHASING
1997 - 2000
DEVELOPING SEPARATE BRANDING STRATEGIES TO OCCUPY DIFFERENT
MARKET SEGMENTS
DEVELOP SEPARATE PRODUCTS FROM COMMON PLATFORMS TO
REDUCE COST
CONTINUE AGGRESSIVE COST REDUCTION AND PROCESS IMPROVEMENT
DELIBERATIVE STRATEGIES
UNREALISED
STRATEGIES
EMERGENT
STRATEGIES
Operations
Resources
1946-1951
Implementing
strategy
1952-1958
Continuity
of strategy
1959-1964
Minor
change and
continuity
1965-1970
Searching
for viable
strategy
Strategic
Reconciliation
Building up
capacity and
capability
Simple
design
Systemisation
of resources
and
processes
Minor
reconfiguration for new
model
Fragmented
acquisition of
new
resources
Standardized
design
Market
Requirements
Emerging,
any
working
vehicle
Maturing,
simple
robust
vehicle
More
sophisticated
performance,
quality
New
1500
model
Multiple
new
designs
Uncertain
rejection of
VW traditional
products
Operations
Resources
1971-1975
Emergent
strategy
1976-1989
Continuing
with minor
changes
1990-1996
Major
change
(internal)
Adapt best
practices from
enlarged
group
Accommodate
new models
and
acquisitions
Drastic
reconfiguration to
increase
efficiency, reduce
costs
Continuous
1997-2000
process
Implementing improvement
and cost
strategy
reduction
Strategic
Reconciliation
Market
Requirements
Clarifying
around
style,
quality and
variety
Defined
range
Segmentation
around
performance,
style and variety
Product
development
paths
Design for
low-cost
manufacture
Common
product
platforms
Increasingly
competitive
around price
Branding
with
price,
quality,
and style
Realised
Strategy
Deliberate
Strategy
Intended
Strategy
Unrealized
Strategy
Emergent
Strategy
Competitive Benefit
Positive
Order Winners
Neutral
Qualifiers
Negative
Low
Achieved Performance
High
Adding Delights
Competitive Benefit
Positive
Delights
Order Winners
Neutral
Qualifiers
Negative
Low
Achieved Performance
High
Competitive Benefit
Positive
Delights
Order Winners
Neutral
Qualifiers
Negative
Low
Achieved Performance
High
Order Winners
Qualifiers
Tomorrow
Tomorrow
Central reservation
Order Winners
Central reservation
Location (autoroutes)
Location (autoroutes)
Location (restaurants)
Price
Loyalty cards
Qualifiers
Location (restaurants)
Price
Loyalty cards
Cleanliness
Dcor
Cleanliness
Dcor
Service
Nigel Slack and Michael Lewis 2003
Tomorrow
Price
Central reservation
Order Winners
Central reservation
Location (autoroutes)
Location (restaurants)
Location (autoroutes)
Location (restaurants)
Price
Loyalty cards
Qualifiers
Location (restaurants)
Price
Loyalty cards
Cleanliness
Dcor
Cleanliness
Dcor
Service
Nigel Slack and Michael Lewis 2003
Delights
Order Winners
Price
Central reservation
Location (autoroutes)
Location (restaurants)
Qualifiers
Location (restaurants)
Price
Loyalty cards
Cleanliness
Decor
Nigel Slack and Michael Lewis 2003
Search processes
Flexible design
Operate at
low cost
Low overheads
Low labor costs
New technology
Trade-offs
Competitive
Objective
A
Competitive
Objective
A
Competitive
Objective
B
Competitive
Objective
B
Model I: Function
(Skinner, 1992:
Hayes and Pisano, 1996)
Performance measure A
Its all about positioning
(e.g. Skinner)
X2
X1
Y1
Y2
Y3
Performance measure B
X3
Performance measure B
Performance measure B
Natural Frontier
of Performance
X
Z
Y
Performance measure A
Performance measure A
Repositioning vs.improvement
Improve
Change in relative performance of competitive
objectives
Reposition
Pivot
Pivot
Base +
Base
Base
Original trade-off
A
A
B
B
Pivot
Base
Pivot
Base +
Base
Trade-off changed because improved
system attributes have enabled A to
be improved without reduction in B
good
good
Service
Cost
bad
bad
Degree and
number of
service checks
Average
waiting time
for service
Ability to keep
waiting time short
even in peak periods
Range of
services
offered
vs.
Cost of
providing
service
vs.
Cost of
providing
service
vs.
Cost of
providing
service
vs.
Cost of
providing
service
good
good
Capital
expenditure
Service
bad
bad
Degree and
number of
service checks
vs.
Average
waiting time
for service
Ability to keep
vs.
waiting time short
even in peak periods
Range of
services
offered
vs.
Capital cost of
purchasing computer
diagnostics equipment
good
good
Capital
expenditure
bad
Capital cost of
vs.
providing computer
diagnostic equipment
Service
bad
Cost of providing
service
good
good
Working
capital
Service
bad
bad
Level of parts
inventory kept in
stock
vs.
Ability to replace
part without any
delay
good
good
Working
capital
Cost
bad
bad
Level of parts
inventory kept in
stock
vs.
good
good
Capital
expenditure
Working
capital
bad
bad
Level of parts
inventory kept in
stock
vs.
Capital
expenditure on
storage space
Service
versus
versus
Cost
versus
Capital
expenditure
versus
versus
versus
Working
capital
Trade-off categories
Nigel Slack and Michael Lewis 2003
Performance objective B
Extended
performance
frontier
Area Q
Area P
Natural
performance
frontier
Performance objective A
Reconciliation as improvement by pushing back
the performance frontier of a trade-off
Nigel Slack and Michael Lewis 2003
Variety
Normal operation
trade-off frontier zone
B
Cost performance
Trade-off curves are (a) broad representations of a performance frontier
zone; (b) dependent on how the operations have been designed
Nigel Slack and Michael Lewis 2003
Operation
A
Market
segment
A
Operation
B
Market
segment
B
Operation
C
Market
segment
C
Operation
A
Operation
B
Operation
C
Market
segment
B
Market
segment
C
Market
segment
A
Army 1
Island
Army 2
Operations Resources
Strategic reconciliation
Market Requirements
Clarity of
objectives
Appropriate
resources
Learning and
improvement
Clearly
focused
resources
but
but
but
Structural
vulnerability
Limited
capabilities
Risk of
market
change
Clearly
targeted
market
Response
time
Utilisation
of staff
1st trade-off
Staff scheduling in
retail loans
Capital
investment in
retail system
3rd trade-off
Speed and
quality of
information
2nd trade-off
Operations cost
and speed of
service
Investment in
multi-function
system
Operational
cost of credit
information
Range of
services
possible
4th trade-off
Insurance IT system
investment
Specific
Ideal
performance
Quality of service
Superficial
Limited
Broad
Range of services
Quality of service
Specific
Superficial
Ideal
performance
High
Low
Cost of providing services
Specific
Quality of service
Ideal
Ideal
performance
performance
Superficial
Limited
Broad
Range of services
Quality of service
Specific
Superficial
Ideal
performance
High
Low
Cost of providing services
Specific
Quality of service
Ideal
performance
D
C
Superficial
Limited
Broad
Range of services
Quality of service
Specific
Superficial
Ideal
performance
D
C
High
Low
Cost of providing services