Professional Documents
Culture Documents
UNDERGROUND CABLE
MANAGEMENT
February 15
Well-Head to WallSocket
February 15
Company Profile
Well-Head to WallSocket
February 15
Well-Head to WallSocket
Vital Statistics
Supply Area
: 384 Sq Kms
No of Consumers
: 22.3 Lakhs
Population Covered
:Above 1 Crore
Connected Load
: 5537 MW
System Maximum Demand
: 1226 MVA
Power Transformers (20/10/15 MVA)
: 1682 MVA
No of Receiving Stations 33(22)/ 11 kV
: 49 Nos.
No of Distribution Substations
: 4083 Nos.
Distribution Transformer
: 2432 MVA
33 kV Capacitors
: 90.75 MVAR
11 kV Capacitors
: 390.968 MVAR
HV Mains (33/22/11 kV)
: 2829 Kms
LT Mains
: 2965 Kms
Street Light lamps
: 74810 Nos.
System loss
: 13.36 %
Reliability Index
: 99.98 %
Annual Growth in demand
: 3.59%
Power Transformer (Installed capacity to MD) : 1.37
Distribution Transformer(Installed capacity to MD) : 1.98
February 15
T & D Network
DTPS
Generation
16.5/ 220 kV
220 kV OH
Lines
220 kV OH Lines
Ghodbunder
220/ 33 kV R/S
Well-Head to WallSocket
33 kV UG
Cables
Versova
1
33 (22)/ 11 kV
Receiving Station
22 kV UG Cables
Transmission
TPC
Tie Line
Aarey
4
TPC Supply
Points
SubTransmission
11 kV UG Cables
11/ 0.433 kV
Substation
11 kV UG Cables
LT UG Cables
February 15
Consumer
Distributio
n
Major
Sizes
(sq mm)
Circuit
kms
AAAC
Zebra
487.5 sq
mm
400 kms
33 kV, UG
XLPE
400, 300
281.23 kms
22 kV, UG
PILC
300
253.98 kms
11 kV, UG
PILC
LT Cables, UG
XLPE
Transmission
220 kV O/H Line
Well-Head to WallSocket
Sub-Transmission
February 15
Distribution
Sub-Transmission Network
About 95 % of the Sub-Transmission and Distribution Network consists
of Underground Cables.
Typical single line diagram of a Receiving Station
February 15
22 / 33 kV Incomer
from BSES / Tata
22/33 kV Breaker
22/33 kV Breaker
10 / 20 MVA pow er
transformer
10 / 20 MVA power
transformer
11 kV Breaker
11 kV Breaker
C a p a c i to r N o . 2
Feed er
F eed er
F eed er
C a p a c i to r N o .1
F eeder
Feed er
Bus Coupler
S ta tio n T ra n s fo rm e r
Well-Head to WallSocket
22 / 33 kV Incomer
from BSES / Tata
Well-Head to WallSocket
February 15
Sr. Core
Size
Type
No
1
3 1/2 C
300 AL
2
3 1/2 C
240 AL
3
3 1/2 C
225 AL
4
3 1/2 C
185 AL
5
3 1/2 C
150 AL
6
3 1/2 C
120 AL
7
3 1/2 C
95 AL
8
3 1/2 C
70 AL
9
3 1/2 C
50 AL
10
4/C
25 AL
11
3 1/2 C
0.2 CU
12
3 1/2 C
0.15 CU
13
3 1/2 C
0.1 CU
14
3 1/2 C
0.075 CU
15
3 1/2 C
0.06 CU
16
3 1/2 C
0.04 CU
17
4/C
0.0225 CU
18
4/C
0.0145 CU
19
2/C
0.0145 CU
20
4/C
16 AL
TOTAL
Length
(in km)
18.380
732.650
171.750
55.930
11.160
1315.600
32.220
4.010
315.390
32.140
12.870
27.570
59.960
58.580
3.390
88.410
48.620
21.390
2.910
3.490
3016.420
LT Cables of
more than 20
different
sizes
are present in
the system
For
Distribution
Network: 31/2 Core
300 and 150 sq mm
size XLPE Cables
have
been
Standardized
February 15
i)
Depth of trench
1.00 meters
ii)
Ground temperature
25 C
Iii)
Thermal resistivity of
soil
150C
cm/W
iv)
Ambient temperature
35 C
Well-Head to WallSocket
Cross-Section of HT Cable
RMB/MISC/CABLE SEC.
PVC FILLER
STRANDED ALUMINIUM CONDUCTOR
INNER SEMICON
Well-Head to WallSocket
XLPE INSULATION
February 15
COPPER TAPE
SEMICONDUCTING WATER SWELLABLE TAPE
OUTER SEMICON
PVC ST2 OUTER SHEATH
PRESSURE EXTRUDED
PVC ST2 INNER SHEATH
HT Cables
Well-Head to WallSocket
February 15
HT Cables
Well-Head to WallSocket
February 15
HT Cables
Well-Head to WallSocket
February 15
HT Cables
Well-Head to WallSocket
February 15
Size
mm2
Min. Number
of Strands /
Wires
per conductor
400
59
3.04
1/1000
89
3.93
300
36
3.4
150
36
2.4
HT Cables
Conductor Screening: Either non-metallic semi-conducting tape
or a layer of extruded semi-conducting compound or a
combination of two.
Insulation: XLPE extruded insulation
Well-Head to WallSocket
February 15
Cross-Section of LT Cable
D:\\ OLDHDD\MISC\cross sectional view of 3.5 c x 240 sqmm cable
Well-Head to WallSocket
XLPE INSULATION
February 15
SECTOR SHAPED
ALLUMINUM CONDUCTOR
EXTRUDED PVC
OUTER SHEATH
FLAT G.S.STRIP
EXTRUDED PVC
INNER SHEATH
LT Cable
Well-Head to WallSocket
February 15
LT Cable
Well-Head to WallSocket
Operating Conditions:
February 15
LT Cable
ComponentsConductor: H4 grade Aluminum conductor of electrolytic grade stranded of
various cross section is as per following table.
Sr
1
2
Well-Head to WallSocket
February 15
4
5
6
7
8
Size
( mm2 )
3C/300
3C/240
3C/150
3C/120
4C/50
4C/25
2C/25
1/500
Conductor
Phase
Min. No.
of
Strands
36
Min. Diameter of
each wire (mm)
3.40
Shape of
Conductor
Sector
Neutral
36
2.40
Sector
Phase
36
3.12
Sector
Neutral
36
2.20
Sector
Phase
36
2.40
Sector
Neutral
19
2.30
Sector
Phase
36
2.20
Sector
Neutral
19
2.30
Sector
Phase
3.20
Sector
Neutral
3.20
Sector
Phase
2.17
Sector
Neutral
2.17
Sector
Phase
2.17
Circular
Neutral
2.17
Circular
Phase
59
3.5
Circular
LT Cable
Well-Head to WallSocket
February 15
Main Considerations
Well-Head to WallSocket
February 15
Well-Head to WallSocket
The cables are laid directly in ground or pulled in ducts. The pulling
tension is quite important and depends on the method of pulling.
Precaution is usually taken not to bend the cable to a sharp radius. Jerks
and pulls to the cables are avoided during installation. Suitable bedding
is provided below the cable.
The I.S. Standard 1255-1983 ,Mode of practice for installation and
maintenance of power cables up to and including 33 kV rating is a very
well brought out document which may offer guidelines with this respect.
Horizontal drilling is employed where excavation of roads for cable laying
is not possible. In this method the road is drilled horizontally and cables
are laid through Hume pipes which are inserted into the drilled holes.
Before cable laying, excavation permit from local municipal authorities is
taken with prior intimation and subsequently necessary road
reinstatement charges are paid on completion of work.
2
February 15
Well-Head to WallSocket
a)
February 15
b)
c)
d)
e)
f)
g)
Well-Head to WallSocket
Although the system might have been designed correctly at the time of
installation, over the period of years several changes may occur in the
system such as, Environmental changes, derating of existing cables
caused by installation of new cables in the vicinity, changes in the
thermal resistivity of soil,defects in the earthing and bonding caused
by breaks in the conductor and earthing material used,increase of
sheath potential beyond the permissible safe limits, excavations by
other utilities etc.
February 15
Due to any of the above reasons, faults may occur even in a well
designed system if not properly monitored and maintained.
Cable Safeguarding is done to prevent any damage to the
underground cables during excavation by other agencies.
The maintenance of cable installation includes route inspection,
periodic checking of current loadings, maintenance and care of all
cables and end terminations.
Well-Head to WallSocket
February 15
Protection of cables
a) Normally the high voltage cables are protected against overcurrent
and earthfault, whereas low voltage cables, are protected by fuses.
Well-Head to WallSocket
February 15
Well-Head to WallSocket
February 15
Cable Testing
Well-Head to WallSocket
February 15
Well-Head to WallSocket
Economic Considerations
February 15
Well-Head to WallSocket
February 15
Advantages:
a) Less fault rate on account of good protection against line and
ground faults.
b) High insulation resistance to earth in all seasons and
polluted atmospheres.
c) High capacitance and low inductance leading to low
impedance of lines.
General Points :
Well-Head to WallSocket
February 15
Well-Head to WallSocket
Technical Considerations :
February 15
a)
b)
c)
d)
Well-Head to WallSocket
February 15
Quantified Benefits
Failures of Transformers have been reduced due to achievement of
better cable safeguarding and hence reduction in number of faults on
the LV network thereby reducing surge current due to faults passing
through transformer have been avoided.
2.00
Failure Rate
Well-Head to WallSocket
2.50
1.50
1.00
0.50
0.00
1994-95
February 15
1995-96
1996-97
1997-98
1998-99
Year
1999-00
2000-01
2001-02
2002-03
Quantified Benefits
The Sound Underground Cable Maintenance and its Effective
Management has made BSES to maintain System Reliability Index to
almost 100%.
R
elia
b
ilityIn
d
ex%
Well-Head to WallSocket
100
99
98
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Year 2003
February 15
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
CONCLUSION
Well-Head to WallSocket
February
Well-Head to WallSocket
Thank You
February 15, 2016