You are on page 1of 28

Chapter 14

Consumer Decision Making I:


The Process

Consumer Behaviour
Canadian Edition
Schiffman/Kanuk/Das
Copyright 2006
Pearson Education Canada Inc.

Levels of Consumer Decision


Making
Extensive Problem
Solving
Limited Problem
Solving

Routine Response
Behaviour
Copyright 2006 Pearson

14-2

Factors That Affect the Type of


Decision Making Process Used
Importance

of the decision
Extent of previous experience
Existence of well-established decision
criteria
Amount of information at hand about each
alternative
The number of alternatives available
Model of consumption being followed
Copyright 2006 Pearson

14-3

Copyright 2006 Pearson

14-4

Consumer Decision Making The


Process
Need

Recognition
Pre-purchase Search
Evaluation of Alternatives

Copyright 2006 Pearson

14-5

Need or Problem Recognition


The

realization that there is a difference


between actual and desired states
The higher the gap, the stronger the need (or
bigger the problem)

Copyright 2006 Pearson

14-6

Types of Problems
Active

Versus Inactive problems

Active: those you are aware of


Inactive: those that you are not yet aware of
(but exist)
Those

that require immediate solutions and


those that do not require immediate
solutions
Copyright 2006 Pearson

14-7

Problem Recognition and


Marketing Strategy

Identify existing consumer problems and find


solutions for these
Lower the actual state
Increase the desired state
Increase the importance of the gap between actual
and desired states
Convert inactive problems to active problems
Convert problems into ones requiring an
immediate solution
Copyright 2006 Pearson

14-8

Pre-Purchase Search
Types

of Information Sources
Types of Information Sought
Factors Affecting Extent of Information
Search

Copyright 2006 Pearson

14-9

Figure 14-3: Types of


Information Sources
PERSONAL

IMPERSONAL

Friends
Neighbors
Relatives
Co-workers
Computer salespeople
Calling the electronics
store

Newspaper articles
Magazine articles
Consumer Reports
Direct-mail brochures
Information from product
advertisements
Internal web site

Copyright 2006 Pearson

14-10

Types of Information Sought


Brands

or alternatives available
Evaluative criteria to be used
Generally, product features
Ratings

of brands on evaluative criteria

Copyright 2006 Pearson

14-11

Copyright 2006 Pearson

14-12

Factors that Increase the Level of


Pre-purchase Search
Product

Factors: Higher search when

It is a long-lasting or infrequently used


product
There are frequent changes in product styling
Large volume is purchased
The price is high
There are many alternative brands
There is much variation in features
continued

Copyright 2006 Pearson

14-13

Factors that Increase the Level of


Pre-purchase Search
Situational

Factors: Higher search when:

Experience is lower
Previous experience was unsatisfactory
Social Acceptability:

Higher search when:

Purchase is a gift
Product is socially visible in use
continued

Copyright 2006 Pearson

14-14

Factors that Increase the Level of


Pre-purchase Search
Value-Related

Factors: Higher search

when:
Purchase is discretionary
All alternatives have both positive and
negative qualities
No agreement among users exists
Conflicting information is available
Other considerations exist
continued

Copyright 2006 Pearson

14-15

Factors that Increase the Level of


Pre-purchase Search
Consumer Factors:

Higher search when:

Consumers are well-educated, have higher


income levels and are younger
Consumers are low in dogmatism and risk
perception
Level of involvement is high
Shopping is seen as an enjoyable activity
continued

Copyright 2006 Pearson

14-16

Evaluation of Alternatives Types


of Consumer Choice Processes
Affective

choices

More holistic; an overall evaluation


based on how one feels about a purchase
Attribute-based

choices

Have pre-determined evaluative criteria


May require both external and internal search
Complicated decision rules may be used
Copyright 2006 Pearson

14-17

Nature of Evaluative Criteria


Can

be tangible or intangible
Include surrogate indicators
Attributes that are used as indicators of another
attribute
Are

often ranked in order of importance

Copyright 2006 Pearson

14-18

Consumer Decision Rules


Procedures

used by consumers to facilitate


brand or other consumption-related choices

Copyright 2006 Pearson

14-19

Consumer Decision Rules


Compensatory

Brands evaluated in terms of each relevant


criteria and the best brand (or one with the
highest score) is chosen
Non-compensatory

Positive evaluations do not compensate for


negative evaluations

Copyright 2006 Pearson

14-20

Non-Compensatory Consumer
Decision Rules
Conjunctive Decision Rule

Product attributes are identified


a minimally acceptable cutoff point is
established for each attribute
brands that fall below the cutoff point on
any one attribute are eliminated from
further consideration.
continued
Copyright 2006 Pearson

14-21

Non-Compensatory Consumer
Decision Rules
Disjunctive Decision Rule

consumers identify product attributes


establish a minimally acceptable cutoff
point for each attribute
accept the brand that meets or exceeds
the cutoff for any one attribute
continued
Copyright 2006 Pearson

14-22

Non-Compensatory Consumer
Decision Rules
Lexicographic

Decision Rule

Product attributes are identified


Product attributes are ranked in terms of
importance
brands are compared in terms of the attribute
considered most important
Brand that scores highest on the first attribute is
chosen
If there is a tie, the scores on the next attribute
are considered
Copyright 2006 Pearson

14-23

Copyright 2006 Pearson

14-24

Issues in Alternative Evaluation


Lifestyles

as a Consumer Decision Strategy


Incomplete Information
Non-comparable Alternatives
Series of Decisions
Consumption Vision
Mental picture of the consequences of using a
particular product

Copyright 2006 Pearson

14-25

Coping with Missing Information


Delay

decision until missing information is


obtained
Ignore missing information and use
available information
Change the decision strategy to one that
better accommodates for the missing
information
Infer the missing information
Copyright 2006 Pearson

14-26

Information Search and


Marketing Strategy
Get

products into consumers evoked set


Limit information search if your brand is
the preferred brand
Increase information search if your
alternative is not the preferred brand
Use point-of-purchase advertising
effectively
Copyright 2006 Pearson

14-27

Alternative Evaluation and


Marketing Strategy

Identify decision rule used by target market and


use suitable promotional messages
Influence the choice of evaluative criteria
Influence the rating of your product on evaluative
criteria used
Use surrogate indicators effectively
Use consumption vision
Copyright 2006 Pearson

14-28

You might also like