Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Prashant Motwani
Prashant.motwani@yahoo.com
9981135555
WATER TANKS
In recent years there has been much emphasis
on water supply projects all over the world,
which are very essential for the social and
industrial development of the country.
Classification based on heads:
1. Tanks resting on ground
2. Elevated tanks supported on staging
3. Underground tanks
1) Circular tanks
2) Rectangular tanks
3) Spherical tanks
Intze tank
For large storage
capacity overhead
tanks, circular tanks
are found economical.
However, In the flat
bottom, the thickness
and reinforcement is
found to be heavy.
In the domed bottom,
though the thickness
and reinforcement in
dome is normal, the
reinforcement in the
ring beam is
excessive .
of
shear
Direct(ct)
N/mm2
Bending(cbt)
(tv)
M15
1.1
1.5
1.5
M20
1.2
1.7
1.7
M25
1.3
1.8
1.9
M30
1.5
2.0
2.2
M35
M35
1.6
1.6
2.2
2.2
2.5
2.5
M40
M40
1.7
1.7
2.4
2.4
2.7
2.7
HYSD Bars
115
150
115
150
115
150
125
190
115
150
125
175
125
175
from
liquid,if it is >=225 mm
3.Tensile stress in shear reinforcement
(1) For Member less than
225 thick
(1) For members >= 225 mm
thick
4. Compressive Stress in
columns subjected to direct
load
In the membrane analysis the member are assumed to act independent of the
others. Hence individually all components of the structure are designed.
The member are therefore subjected to Hoop(also called circumferential stress)
stress and meridonal stress.
Just like a balloon
Fig shows the deflected shape of water tank. The firmed lines show the
undeflected shape of tank.
To spherical dome
Top ring beamB1
Side wall (circular)
Bottom ring beam B2
Conical dome
Bottom dome
Bottom ring beam B3
provided
for
h1
r1
Merid Stress
Here
At = 0,
At = 90,
Wr
)
Here Comes the Magic Again
At = 0,
At = 90
) = (Max Compression)
=
) = - (Max Tension)
Where
F= Hoop Stress
r= radius of top dome
OMETIMES
As ring beam is a
beam and beam
always have shear
Should ring beam
be designed for
shear too?
Numerical Example:
Design an Intze tank for 1000KL (1 Million Litres)
Tank Dia=13m
Rise of top dome= 1.5m
Rise of bottom dome= 1.7m
Rise of conical dome= 1.75m
Free board= 0.15m
Steel=
(in kN)
kN
kN/m2
CONICAL DOME
The conical dome is subjected to both meridional thrust as well as
hoop tension.
Meridional thrust: The meridional thrust in the conical dome is due
to vertical forces (weights) transferred to it at its base. The total load
consists of
Weight of top dome, cylindrical wall etc.
Weight of water
Self-weight
Hoop tension:- Due to water pressure and selfweight, the conical dome will be subjected to
hoop tension.
Meridional Thrust
M
Merid Stress
Why r3?
Because meridonal thrust varies
from 0 tat top to max at bottom
TIRED?
Take a break
42
If you are not living on the edge, you are taking too much space
NOT PHYSICALLY BUT METAPHORICALLY
7/11/16
43
Confidence is momentarily thing, sometimes you are confident sometimes you are not
Even I was scared before coming to the class
7/11/16
44
STOP ARGUING!
Because people will drag you down to their and level
and will beat you there with experience
DELAYED GRATIFICATION
Marshmallow Experiment ( Stanford)
5year kids, if eaten in 15mins just 1 marshmallow
if delayed , will be given more marshmallow
Those who showed delayed gratification
HIGH SAT SCORES
Higher Living Standards
Better BMI
7/11/16
45
BE Decisive
Decide your dream today
Either pursue your dream or help others to other complete their dream
Dont Be Heuristic
7/11/16
46
BOTTOM DOME
Bottom dome develops compressive stresses both meridional
as well as along hoops, due to weight of water supported by it
and also due to its own weight.
Spherical radius of bottom Dome:
W16 = W14+W15
Sin(b)
Meridional thrust
Merid Force (N)
Hoop Force
)
< 5 N/mm2 ( here we dont reduce 40% as there will
not be wind effect on botoom dome)
Again here both meridonal thrust and hoop force are compressive stress and
No tension, thus the steel has to be just distribution steel
In the membrane analysis the member are assumed to act independent of the others. Hence individually all
components of the structure are designed.
. The member are therefore subjected to only direct stresses and as the joints are not considered rigid i.e. as
all members are acting individual bending moment is not introduced.
COMPARISON
Force and Bending moment for 9lakh
Component
Membrane design
Continuity Analysis
19900
41931
Top Beam
189710
60380 -8.257426169
Wall @
104827
-2035.06
2043.32
Wall @ base
343000
299301 -4743.546328
Middle Beam
604452
718323 -414.1410042
Conical dome(Top)
555070.6
478882 4457.687332
Conical dome(bottom)
535070.6
98463 53634.45591
61539 -35559.58233
Bottom Dome
Circular girder
57668068659.7894 49178.49426
Membrane Design
Hoop steel
Continuity Analysis
Moment steel
Top Dome
300
280
194
Top Beam
1265
703
negligible
1372
699
Wall @ base
2512
1995
7895
Middle Beam
4030
4789
negligible
Conical dome(Top)
3700
3193
7895
Conical dome(bottom)
3700
656
1077
Bottom Dome
515
Circular girder
3825.03
1179
0
4280
Membrane design
Hoop force(N/m)
Continuity Analysis
B.M.(N-m/m)
Top Dome
9780
32670
-1390.64
Top Beam
106660
29403
0.490932371
73507
1390.15
-1479.4282
Wall @
Wall @ base
300000
228234
Middle Beam
492200
608623 -627.8556201
Conical dome(Top)
484260
405749
1407.28382
Conical dome(bottom)
435976
5570
58805.02094
3481 -22363.89169
Bottom Dome
Circular girder
352490 179699.265
37944.95813
Membrane Design
Hoop steel
Continuity Analysis
Top Dome
240
218
133
Top Beam
711
433
negligible
1200
490
Wall @ base
2055
1522
2493
Middle Beam
3281
4057
negligible
Conical dome(Top)
3228
2705
2493
Conical dome(bottom)
3228
37
1180
Bottom Dome
515
Circular girder
2343.37
742
0
3530
Membrane design
Continuity Analysis
Top Dome
16340
33160
-1540.94
Top Beam
170340
53056
17.01389229
107771
1523.93
Wall @
Wall @ base
490000
451763 -6675.515139
Middle Beam
883400
834025
24.21766469
Conical dome(Top)
762958
556016
5951.297474
Conical dome(bottom)
686390
115128
70710.7457
Bottom Dome
Circular girder
0
0
71955 -45505.65092
760700 105724.418
62590.82336
Membrane Design
Hoop steel
Continuity Analysis
Moment steel
Top Dome
300
221
147
Top Beam
1136
823
negligible
1960
718
Wall @ base
3305
3012
10541
Middle Beam
5889
5560
negligible
Conical dome(Top)
5086
3707
10541
Conical dome(bottom)
5086
768
1419
Bottom Dome
515
Circular girder
5057.17
1509
0
5747
Conclusion
The above summary shows that, the effect of
continuity leads to 9% increase of reinforcement
compare to membrane design. However, widely used
method is membrane design as this continuity
analysis can be considered more important for more
capacity of tanks. For less capacity, it leads to minor
difference. For this capacity as for 9 lakhs litres,
continuity analysis leads to more reinforcement and
hence design done by continuity should be adopted
and if membrane design is adopted, chances for error
by comparing with membrane increase by 9%.
Hoop Tension:
Beam Action:
It will be clear that the total water pressure Wh acting at each point is partially resisted by
Hoop force Ph and partly by the wall acting as a vertical beam Ph
This action is similar to a 2-way slab, where the load is shared in 2 directions
For a Rigid Base an free at top. These following boundary condistions will
be required to solve the differential equation
Capacity= 5000kL
Free Board= 200mm
Depth = 4m
At Last:
Its very important to know that
Whatever you understand depends how you
perceive it