Professional Documents
Culture Documents
By Supriya Kumari
Damodaram Sanjivayya National Law University, Visakhapatnam
Introduction
Protection of intellectual property rights
allows
research work and knowledge
generation and is a mechanism to protect
IPR rights.
The provision of Compulsory License
enables the government to balance the
rights of the Patent holder with its
obligations to ensure
a) Working of Patents,
b) Availability of the products at a reasonable
price,
c)
Promotion
and
dissemination
of
technological invention and
Patent
A patent is a grant from the Government
on patentee.
For a limited period of time.
The exclusive privilege of making, selling
and using the invention for which a patent
has been granted.
Purpose of Patent
To enjoy the exclusive rights over the
invention.
To ensure commercial returns to the
inventor and money spend in generating a
new product.
It promote public interest in sectors of
Socio-Economic
and
Technological
development of India.
Safeguards
Provision is to ensure availability of drugs
at reasonable prices .
Provision is to deal with public health
emergency.
Revocation of Patent in public interest and
on security considerations.
Compulsory Licensing
Statutory Provisions
The provisions of CL comes Under Chapter XVI
of the Patent Act comprising sections 84 to 92.
The Patent Act allows for grant of Compulsory
License on two grounds
a) Abuse of Patent Right (sec 84(1))
b) Public Interest (sec 92 (A))
Background
The concept of Compulsory Licensing
originated in the UK in 1623.
For making the local application possible for a
patented invention.
In 19th century in France, a law was passed to
forfeit a patent, if not used for a stipulated
time frame.
UK Provision to grant a Compulsory License
under Patent Act
1. If the patent was not being utilized in the UK.
2. If the basic necessities of the public were
hindered.
3. If any person is prevented from using or
Continued
TRIPS requires that the compulsory Licensing
to be used primarily.
To benefit the local markets.
It is a requirement that puts restriction on
Governments
for
importing
drugs
manufactured overseas.
Legal Perspective
License Under the Paris Convention (1883)
State to take legislative measures for
granting compulsory licenses. According to
Article 5A (2) of the Paris Convention
Each country have the right to take
legislative measures for the grant of
Compulsory License.
It is to prevent the abuses due to the
exercise of the exclusive rights conferred by
the patent.
Continued.
Under TRIPS (1995)
Article 30, it limits the exceptions to the rights
conferred under patents.
Provided they do not unreasonably prejudice
the legitimate interests of the patent owner,
Taking into account the legitimate interests of
third parties.
Article 31, it refers to Compulsory Licensing as
other use without Authorization of the rights
holder, but allows countries to do so only
under certain conditions.
Procedure
Licensing
For
Compulsory
Patients
a. Compulsory Licensing extensively helpful
for the Financially challenged patients of
developing countries.
b. It is easy to access the medicines at
lower prices for maintaining good health.
Global Perspective
a. Developing
countries
are
giving
importance to Compulsory License due to
unavailability and unaffordability of
medicines.
b. Developed countries like U.S and Europe
are opposing it due to decline in
innovation.
National Emergency
Extreme urgency
Continued.
The Compulsory License was granted in
accordance with the grounds described under
sec 84 of the Indian Patent Act.
The License is valid till expiry of the Patent in
2021.
The Compulsory License enables Natco to
sell the drug at a price not exceeding Rs
8,880 for a pack of 120 tablets (one months
therapy) as against Rs 2,84,428 being the
cost of Nexavar sold by Bayer.
The order also makes it obligatory for Natco
to supply the drug free of cost to at least 600
needy patients per year.
Loopholes
Sharp decrease in price
Conflict between the Developed and
Developing countries over the use of
Compulsory Licensing.
Controversy in the Article 31 due to its
ambiguity on the issue of determining the
proper Economic value of the Compulsory
License.
Conclusion
It can be concluded that compulsory Licensing
now became the new hope for the Financially
challenged patients.
It is challenge for the Innovators and can turns
into the most concerned Intellectual Property
matter around the globe at this present scenario.
It is strongly recommended that Compulsory
Licenses be issued whenever pressing
circumstances demand.
This will work as a deterrent against misuse of
Patent Rights by the patent holders.
THANK YOU