Professional Documents
Culture Documents
BRIDGES
Presented By:
M Shahid Mehmood
2k15-PhD/UET-CE-73
BRIDGES
INTRODUTION
Span
Abutments
On the other hand they often are very irregular, with
Variable
column heights
chamfered
rectangular
sections
the
longitudinal
degree of certainty
Strength and stiffness can be made equal in orthogonal
directions since the pier will respond as a vertical cantilever
in all directions.
Soil-Structure Interaction
Bridges are often require to cross rivers and valleys where
foundation conditions are less than ideal. As a consequence
soil structure interaction effects require special considerations.
In fig 10.13 (a), the pier is supported on spread footing.
Partial uplift of the footing on foundation material cause
increase in base rotation. Thus increasing foundation flexibility
and yield displacement increases. Thus reducing displacement
ductility demand and reduces damping.
Superstructure
movement
joints
are
provided
to
continual maintenance.
Location of movement joints should be considered from the
seismic as well as serviceability view point.
There will be additional damping associated with relative
joint displacements.
max
y
,hollow 4
,solid 16.4
y C1 y H Lsp
(10.1)
C1 1
3
Lsp 0.022 f ye d bl
Superstructure Rigid
1
1
Superstructure Flexible
C1
6 1 C
2
4 EI ( Ls1.Ls 2 )
C2
(10.2)
6 I ss ( H Lsp )( Ls1 Ls 2 )
base
and
pile/superstructure
foundation
flexibility.
The
additional
foundation
flexibility is
F ( M B VB hF )( H hF ) kv I
(10.3)
(10.4a)
(10.4b)
(10.4c)
(10.4d)
C1 1.187 0.223ln(H/D)
C1 1.137 0.230ln(H/D)
C1 1.137 0.230ln(H/D)
C1 1.840 0.363ln(H/D)
C1 1.767 0.360ln(H/D)
C1 0.447 0.055ln(H/D)
(10.5a)
(10.5b)
(10.5c)
(10.5d)
(10.5e)
(10.5f)
2.25 y ( H Lsp ) 2
3D
(10.6)
D y ls y L p H
10.12
ls ,c
c ,ls
ls , s
s ,ls
d c
10.7a
10.7b
0.2 0.65 P
'
ce
f Ag
10.8
4 Ab
'
10.9
D
S
Step 2: Determine the confined compression strength of core
concrete ( f cc' ).
Step 3: Determine the damage-control compression strain
dc ,c
v f yh su
0.004 1.4
f cc'
10.10
10.11
D y ls y L p H
10.12
connected
to
the
superstructure,
under
f c' 30 MPa
f y f yh 420 MPa
fu
f ye
1.35
u ,ls 0.10
su 0.12
d bh 20 mm @100mm
d bl 40 mm
Concrete cover 50 mm
Solution
Case (a) Fixed End Connection.
Step 1: Determine the volumetric ratio (From Equ.10.9)
v 4 Ab
Ab d 2
4
2
(20) 314
4
D'S
f yh
f
'
ce
420
39
10.8
f ce
'
1.23
Thus,
dc ,c
v f yh su
0.004 1.4
f cc'
'
ce
10.8 and
v 0.00654
dc ,c
0.00654 x420x0.12
0.004 1.4
48
= 0.0136
Step 4: Determine axial force ratio
P '
10
0.0816
39 x3.14
f ce Ag
Step 5: Estimate neutral axis
depth
longitudinal
reinforcement ratio = 1.8 %
From fig. 10.9 (a),
c / D 0.240
c 0.240 x 2 0.480
ls ,c
ls , s
dc ,c
0.0136
0.48
s ,ls
0.0283 / m
d c
0.06
0.0414 / m
1.93 0.48
governs
s ,ls 0.6 u
0.6 x0.1
0.06
fu
k 0.2
1 0.08
f
From Equ.4.30
Lsp 0.022 f ye d bl
D y ls y L p H
From Equ.10.1
y C1 y H Lsp
f ye
462
2
E
200,000
.00231
From Equ.4.57a
2.25 y
C1 1
Lsp 2 Lsp
y C1 y H Lsp
D y ls y L p H
ls ,c 0.0283 / m
y 0.0026 / m
k 0.2
1 0.08
f
Lsp 0.022 f ye d bl
Lc 12 m
D y ls y L p H
From Equ.10.1
y C1 y H Lsp
C1 1
Lsp Lsp
y C1 y H Lsp
D y ls y L p H
L p D 1 0.1 H H cp D 1.6
Average value of HCP/HIG are,
0.52
0.57
Sand
Clay
(10.13)
A:
Determine
Height
from
in
ground
hinge
superstructure.
Step B: Follow steps 1 to 6 for a footing supported pier.
Step C: Determine the plastic hinge length.
Step D: Determine the design displacement.
Pinned Connection : D y , IG ls y L p , IG H IG
(10.14)
Fixed connection : D y , F C3 ls y L p ,T H IG
(10.15)
C3 1.68
Sand
1.54
Clay
to
Column Height = H = 12 m
f c' 30 MPa
f y f yh 420 MPa
fu
f ye
1.35
u ,ls 0.10
su 0.12
d bh 20 mm @100mm
d bl 40 mm
Concrete cover 50 mm
Soil is dense sand,
37 o
Solution
Case (a) Pinned End Connection.
Step A: Determine Height from in-ground hinge to superstructure
for
H IG D 3.40 0.84 x H D
H IG D 3.40 0.8412 2
H IG 8.44 x 2 16.88 mm
ls 0.0283 / m
y 0.0026 / m
H CP 0
L p , IG D 1 0.112 0 2 1.6
L p , IG
3.2 mm
y , IG C1 y H 2
C1 1.137 0.230 ln H D
(10.5b)
y , IG 0.725x 0.0026x12 2
0.537 mm
D y , IG ls y L p , IG H IG
0.537 (0.0283 - 0.0026)x3.2x16.88
1.925 m
H IG
D 3.40 0.84 x H D
H IG 8.44 x 2 16.88 mm
ls 0.0283 / m
y 0.0026 / m
L p kH CP Lsp 2 Lsp
For sand
H CP / H IG 0.5
This implies,
So,
H cp 0.5x16.88 8.78 m
k 0.07
Lsp 407 mm
For sand,
C3 1.68
y , F C1 y
IG
Lsp
C1 0.310 0.030 ln H D
(10.1)
(10.5c)
So,
Thus,
y , F 0.256x0.0026x(16.88 0.407) 2
0.199 m
D 0.199 1.68(0.0283 - 0.0026)x1.022x16.88
0.624 m
= 10,000 kN
f c' 30 MPa
f y f yh 420 MPa
fu
f ye
1.35
u ,ls 0.10
su 0.12
= 10 MPa
Concrete cover 50 mm
Soil is dense sand,
37 o
1st we check that the column axial loads are compatible with the
assumption of column can support 10,000 kN.
Central pier C: using a tributary length of superstructure 50m
and self weight = d2/4 x 23.5 = 3.14x22/4 x23.5 = 73.8 kN/m,
the axial loads at top and bottom of column C are,
column top: P = 50 x 190 = 9500 kN
column base: P = 9500 + 12 x 73.8 = 10400 kN
Pier B & D: using a tributary length of superstructure 45m, axial
loads are
column top: P = 45 x 190 = 8550 kN
column base: P = 8550 + 16 x 73.8 = 9700 kN
D = 0.326 m
Y = 0.0712 m
Pier B & D:
Y = (H+2Lsp)2/6
= .0026(16+2x0.407)2/6 = 0.123 m
Displacement ductilities:
Pier C:
Pier B & D:
c 0.05 0.444
Pier C:
c 0.05 0.444
4.58 1
0.160
4.58
2.65 1
Pier B & D: B , D 0.05 0.444
0.138
4.58
System Damping:
As all piers have same flexure reinforcement ratio, as a
consequence the flexural strength of all piers will be
essentially the same,
i i
VB B VD D VC C
H
m
VC B
VB
sys
H
C
VB VD VC
Vi
m
sys
1 1 1.33
0.147
16
V 1.33VB
12 B
MB MD
VB H D
HB
16
VD
V 1.0VD
Effective Period:
16 D
The effective period of response is found entering with a
displacement of 0.326m, and intersecting the spectrum
for sys = 0.147 as shown by dashed line in figure (10.15
b). The effective time period is
Te = 1.761 sec
Effective mass:
1/3 of the column mass be added to the mass lumped at the
superstructure level. Hence, the effective mass is
me.g = 190 x 180 + 0.333(12+2x16)x73.8 = 35300kN
Effective Stiffness:
From eq. 3.1
4 2 me
Ke
Te2
4 2 x 35.3
45.9 MN / m
2
9.805x1.761
Base Shear:
From eq. 3.2
Vbase = keD = 45.9 x 0.326 = 14.95 MN
VB VC VD VBase
VB 1.33VB VB VBase
3.33VB VBase VB
P- Effect:
From eq. 3.45, the stability index is given by
P max
MD
VBase
3.33
10 x 0.326
0.091
35.9
Thank You