This type of evaluations, for his part, require a lot of
primary data (base) of various aspects, that it is obtained most of all of nets of environmental monitoring, and that it results in simpler and synthetic way in environmental indicators, in order to be able to communicate it to the population in general and to the politicians.
METHODOLOGY.
In order to carry the study out it was considered the
combination of the documentary investigation and the field work. In specific, in the first instance he turned to various sources of information'deep bibliographic revision, like books, scientific goods, technical reports and official statistics with the aim of constructing a state of the art in the matter of the eia and of environmental indicators.
EVALUATION of the ENVIRONMENTAL
IMPACT.
The term impact (presentee in this first-time-ever
formulation in 1824), takes shape of impactus that in Latin he signifies literally to collide. But, in 1960 he was granted the figurative touch of strong and harmful action. That way, in conjunction with the environmental word, he was given a significance of effect produced in the environment and the natural processes by the human activity in a space and one fixed terms.
In Mexico, the long process of the implementation of the
instrument of the eia can relate with the evolution of the predominant focuses in the environmental stewardship that ruled the legal and institutional change under the strong international influence in the space of the environmental protection (Arriaga, 2012).
ENVIRONMENTAL INDICATORS FOR THE EIA.
The environmental, social, economic great quantity of
data of the spaces, etcetera that are used in the eia for the decision makers, is turned into synthetic way in indicators and indexes.