JOSHUA

TAVRA
FINAL
PERSUASIVE ESSAY
I DO NOT OWN NONE OF THESE PICTURES,
THEY ARE ONLY USE FOR EDUCATIONAL PURPOSES.

FUN FACTS ABOUT ME

NAME: JOSHUA A. TAVRA
PEOPLE LIKE TO CALL ME JOSH FOR SHORT OR TARVER
BECAUSE PEOPLE CANT PRONOUNCE MY LAST NAME
BIOLOGY MAJOR
I PLAY A LOT OF INSTRUMENTS AS YOU GUYS KNOW
ALREADY
I HAVE A MEDICAL BACKGROUND- AS A MEDICAL
ASSISTANT NOT HEALTH RELATED

Nucle
Power
ar

THESIS
I WILL BE EXPLAINING WHY NUCLEAR
POWER IS BAD AND DANGEROUS IN
TODAY SOCIETY.

PREVIEWS

WE WILL TALK ABOUT 2 SOLUTIONS TO

SOLVE THIS CASE OF NUCLEAR/ POWER
AND WARHEAD

WHY IS NUCLEAR POWER BAD?

SECTION 1A

NUCLEAR POWER IS BAD BECAUSE IT ONLY

CAUSES HORRIBLE DESTRUCTION AND LEAVES
NOTHING IN ITS PATH WHEN ITS BETWEEN ITS
MILEAGE AND RADIUS.

WHY IS NUCLEAR POWER BAD?

SECTION 1B

NUCLEAR POWER RELEASES TO MUCH

RADIATION WHICH CAN CONTAMINATE MANY
THINGS SUCH AS PLANTATION, WATER,
OVERPOPULATED AREAS WITH LIVE SPECIES.

WHY IS NUCLEAR POWER BAD?

SECTION 1C

IF THIS KIND OF POWER FALLS IN THE WRONG

HAND FORGET ABOUT AMERICA BECAUSE THE
WHOLE WORLD IS GOING TO BE SCREWED.

WHY IS NUCLEAR POWER BAD?

SECTION 1C

A LOT OF OUR TAX MONEY GO TO THE BOMB

AND ESPECIALLY THE CRAFT THAT HOLDS THESE
BOMBS.

UCSCUA
HTTP://WWW.UCS
USA.ORG/
2013
B61 BOMB CAN COST UP TO 20
MILLION EACH
A W-76 NUKE CAN COST UP TO 2
MILLION EACH.
AND WE HAVE 700 OF THEM

DO WE ACTUALLY NEED ALL OF THESE AND

PAY SO MUCH FOR THEM.

THIS MONEY CAN BE USED FOR

RESEARCH

POVERTY

INSTEAD OF WASTING OUR MONEY

ON NUCLEAR WEAPONS. WE SHOULD
USE IT ON RESEARCH WHICH CAN
HELP US BECOME MORE STRONGER
AS A NATION IN THE FUTURE.

INSTEAD OF USING OUR MONEY ON

NUCLEAR WEAPONS, WE SHOULD USE
IT TO AN ADVANTAGE TO HELP
PEOPLE FROM THE STREETS FIND A
BETTER PLACE AND MAKE AMERICA
GREAT LIKE IT WAS BACK THEN IN THE
PAST PAST PAST YEARS.

WHAT CAN BE THE

CAUSE OF THIS?

WHY DO WE HAVE NUCLEAR BOMB?

WE HAVE NUCLEAR BOMBS BECAUSE, IT SCARES OTHER COUNTERED FROM
ENTERING IN AND DESTROING IT.
IT ALSO MAKES A COUNTRY LOOK MORE POWERFUL.N AND STRONG.
U.S. WAS THE FIRST COUNTRY TO USE THE ATOMIC BOMB ON HIROSHIMAWHICH IS SIMILAR TO THE NUCLEAR BOMB BECAUSE THEY REACT THE SAME
WHEN URANIUM IS HEATED AND PLUTONIUM.

MORE CAUSES
ANOTHER CAUSE IS THAT BIG COUNTRIES THAT HAVE A LAGE POPULATION
NEEDS THERE PROTECTION FROM OTHER COUNTRIES THAT TRY TO INVADE
FOR POWER OR ECONOMIC WEALTH.
THE ONLY COUNTRIES THAT HAVE THESE NUCLEAR BOMBS ARE:
RUSSIA, USA, U.K., FRANCE, CHINA, INDIA, PAKISTAN, NORTH KOREA AND
ISRAEL.

SOURCES
HTTP://WWW.BUSINESSINSIDER
.COM
HOW THE US'S NUCLEAR WEAPONS
COMPARE TO RUSSIA'S
COUNTRY LIKE TO COMPETE BY
SHOWING WHO HAS MORE
POWER AND SHOW THAT THEY
CAN WIN YOU IN A FIGHT WITH
JUST ONE BLAST

IF A SMALL PORTION OF THAT

NUCLEAR WASTE TOUCH OUR
OCEAN- THE CATASTROPHES WILL
BEGIN OF CONTAMINATION AND
COUNTRUES THAT EAT A LOT OF
SEA FOOD WILL DIE FROM THE
CONTAMINATED FISH AND THE
CYLCE OF DEATH WILL START OT
BEGIN AND HAPPEN.

HTTP://WWW.WSJ.COM/VIDEO/OPINION-JOURN
AL-WHY-WE-STILL-NEED-NUCLEAR-WEAPONS/C
29CEC6F-1260-435C-BBC4-8ED76B4F3D0E.HT
ML

SOLUTIONS

STOP MAKING ATOMIC WEAPONS IF

WERE NOT GOING TO USE THEM.

SOLUTIONS

IF THEY ARE GOING TO MAKE MORE

NUCLEAR BOMBS, USE THE SAME
STRUCTURE OF THE OLD ONES AN STOP
WASTING OUR TAX PAYING MONEY TO
SHOW OFF THAT WE ARE STRONG.

SOLUTIONS
INSTEAD OF THE PRESIDENT VOTING FOR
THE USAGE NUCLEAR POWER, IT SHOULD
BE A VOTE BETWEEN THE PRESIDENT,
ATTORNEY GENERAL, AND THE WHITE
HOUSE GENERAL.

HOW MY SOLUTION CAN FIX THIS?

IF THE UNITED STATES STOPS WASTING MONEY ON NUCLEAR POWER, WE
WILL HAVE MORE MONEY THAT CAN BE USED FOR EDUCATION, POVERTY,
RESEARCH, PAY THE AT LEAST SOME OF THE TRILLION DOLLARS WE OWE.
RECYCLE THE NUCLEAR PARTS WHICH EVERY YEAR THEY THROW AWAY AND
USE THEM FOR THE NEW NUCLEAR BOMBS THEY TRY TO ATTEMPT
WHY THE VOTE SHOULD BE BETWEEN A 3 VOTE- BECAUSE IT AN ODD
NUMBER WHICH THEY CANT TIE- AND KNOW ID WE SHOULD BOMB THE
LOCATION OR NOT.
A PERMANENT SOLUTION IS TO STOP MAKING THE WEAPONRY. WE REALLY
DONT NEED SO MUCH TO DESTROY A SINGLE CONTINENT. IN ORDER TO
DESTROY THE WORLD FROM THE CALCULATION ON FPIF- WE NEED 15,000 OF
THE BOMBS TO DESTROY THE WORLD. SO, 7,000 CAN DESTROY THE U.S
ALONE AND PARTS OF CANADA AND ALASKA.

MY CONCLUSION
WHY NUCLEAR POWER IS BAD
WHY ITS A WASTE OF MONEY
WHAT COULD HAPPEN IF IT FELL IN SOME ONE HAD WITH BAD INTENTIONS TO DO
SOMETHING.
WHAT CAN THE MONEY ACTUALLY CAN BE USED FOR
OUR SOLUTION TO MAKE THIS OUR COUNTRY A BETTER PLACE

STOP USING OUR MONEY ON THINGS WE

HAVE