Example Model Tuning Report - 2100Mhz

CW Drive Test and Model Tuning
for 2100MHz.
Circle Name: RAJASTHAN

City Name: BIkaner
Date: 09-04-2017
Partner Name: ZTE
Restricted 1
19-Jun-17 Corp-NWS/Planning/4G
CW Drive Test Report
Idea Bikaner
Date: 09-04-2017
19-Jun-17 Corp-NWS/Planning/4G Restricted 2

Contents
1. Objective
2. Methodology
3. CW Test Setup and Parameter settings
4. Acceptance Criteria for per band of testing
5. CW Drive test and Model Tuning
6. Tuned Models.
7. Link-budget comparison Tuned Vs Bidding.

Objective
DoT has allocated 5 MHz spectrum to Idea in 2100 band to launch UMTS services.
Objective of CW Drive Test and Model Tuning activity is to ensure the accurate
tuning of the propagation model of the acquired spectrum by Idea for Radio
Network Design of FDD-UMTS Network in this circle.
Results of CW Drive test and Model Tuning conducted for BIkaner (RAJASTHAN)
including test setup, procedure, equipment specifications are captured in this
document.

Methodology
1. CW Transmitter is used to Transmit the Carrier wave from selected sites.
2. CW Transmitter setup on site is shown with diagrams.
3. Link-budget of the CW transmitter setup is provided in further slides.
4. CW receiver is used scan the Transmitted CW signal in the entire allocated
bandwidth with 5 MHz.
5. Drive test is performed around the selected and agreed drive route between
IDEA and Vendor.
6. CW measurements are collected and provide as input to the Model tuning
activity.
7. Model tuning is done for each drive test location.
8. Average of the tuned models per morphology clutter is considered for
acceptance process with IDEA.
9. CW Receiver has an excellent dynamic range and can scan up-to -125dBm
receive signals from transmitter.
10. Penetration loss test.
CW Test Setup
CW Transmitter
Make : Vedang Radio Tech. Pvt. Ltd.
Omni Antenna(10dBi) Model : VCT-DG-43
Omni Antenna Make: Twin Engineers
Power Supply Omni Antenna Model: TW/2100/10dB
Omni Antenna Gain: 10dBi
CW Receiver
Make : Agilent
Model : W1314-E08
Omni Antenna make: Accessory of Agilent
receiver
Feeder Cable(5M) Omni Antenna Model: Accessory of Agilent
CW receiver
Transmitter GPS with cable: Holux (Yes)
(VCT-DG-43 Feeder Cables, Jumper cables ,
& Vedang) Jumper Cable Connectors and accessories for
transmitter and receiver installation.
Connectors
Power supply accessories
Laptop
GPS Antenna Vehicle
Omni Antenna
Connector Cables
CW Receiver
Laptop
(Agilent)
Power Supply
CW Transmitter and Receiver Specifications
Model Name and Number
Specification CW Transmitter CW Receiver Attach snaps of CW

Frequency Range 2110-2170 MHz 2100-2180 MHz transmitter
Resolution Bandwidth - 1KHz to 10MHz
Video Filters - -
RF Power +23 to +43 -125dBm
Marker Resolution - -
Sweep Time - -
Display Range - -
Logarithmic Level Axis - -
Accuracy 0.5dB 1.5dB typical (0 to 55 C) Attach snaps of CW
Connector N Type Female N Type Female Receiver
GPS Connector No SMA Female
Operating Temperature
Range 0 to 50C 0 to 55 C
Weight 9Kg (Approx.) 2.4Kg(Approx.)
AC Power 230V AC 50Hz 100-240V AC 50Hz

Acceptance Criteria for per band of testing
As per Idea Guidelines
CW Test :-
1. CW test should be carried out for the Sites identified per city
2. Survey forms should be filled properly
3. Number of samples per site after averaging should be at least 5000 to 8000.
4. The target clutter category, for which the site has been selected, should have
been covered properly in the test and the drive test file should contain at least 8000
samples for that category.
5. Submission of indoor penetration loss measurements for at-least 2 samples for
each clutter category.
Model Tuning :-
1. Each model should be based on CW test of mutually agreed sites

2. Global mean error on calibration sites: < +/-1 dB
3. Global standard deviation on calibration sites: < 7.5 dB
4. Mean error on each calibration/verification site: < +/- 0.5 dB
5. Standard deviation on each calibration/verification site: < 8 dB
6. Prediction Match rate at site level should be >=85% between the CW drive bins
and Predicted model.
Frequency Spots and Settings
Rajasthan Bikaner
CW transmitter
Downlink Frequency
Start : 2129 MHz
End : 2134 MHz
Center : 2131.4 MHz
Transmitted Freq. : 2131.4 MHz
Allocated Bandwidth: 5 MHz
CW receiver

CW Sites Distribution

CW Site Category & EiRP at CW Transmitter.
Sites Selected for Drive Test
Cable
Cell Transmitter
Loss(dB) + Antenna EIRP(dB
Sr. No Cell Name Longitude Latitude Antenna Azimuth Clutter Output
Connector Gain(dBi) m)
Height Power(dBm)
Loss(dB)
1 BWDI30 76.8331 28.2043 31 Omni Urban 43 1.55 10 51.45
2 BWDI31 76.86343 28.201825 32 Omni Urban 43 1.55 10 51.45
3 BWDI8 76.8819 28.1458 40 Omni Industrial 43 1.55 10 51.45
4 TPKR02 76.7953 28.1145 45 Omni Industrial 43 1.55 10 51.45

5 BWDI16 76.8128 28.1575 40 Omni Highrise 43 1.55 10 51.45
6 BWDI49 76.8203 28.1912 40 Omni Highrise 43 1.55 10 51.45
EIRP=Transmitter Output Power Cable Loss + Antenna

Gain
Urban
Site- BWDI30 Site- BWDI31
Measurement Prediction Prediction Measurement
Predicted Points
Total Points Num.
Site Id Difference(dB) Num. post Model Percentage
in CW drive
tuning.
BWDI30 -8<Difference(dB)<=8 13067 11309 86.54%

Industrial
Site- BWDI08 Site- TPKR02
Measurement Prediction Measurement Prediction
Predicted Points
Total Points Num.
Site Id Difference(dB) Num. post Model Percentage
in CW drive
tuning.
TPKR02 -8<Difference(dB)<=8 10844 9392 86.61%

Highrise
Measurement Prediction Measurement Prediction
Total Points Predicted Points

Site Id Difference(dB) Num. in CW Num. post Percentage
drive Model tuning.


Model Tuning Summary and Result
Global Statistics
CW
Standard Root mean correlation
Morphology Collected Mean error
Deviation square coefficient
Bins
Urban 23,450 -0.4 5.63 5.64 0.87

Industrial 19,576 0.26 5.29 5.29 0.87
HR 13,600 0.39 5.45 5.46 0.9

Tuned Model K-Values
Atoll(SPM) Format
Correspondin
g Cm of Cost
Atoll SPM K1 K2 K3 K4 K5 K6 K7
Hata231 wrt
Tuned Model
Near 6.6742
20.5 43.8 5.83 0.24 -6.55 0 0
Urban
Far 20.46 44.9 5.83 0.241 -6.55 0 0 -2.6742
Near -12.3842
20 40 5.83 0.39 -6.55 0 0
Indus
Far 20.02 41.4 5.83 0.39 -6.55 0 0 -5.3842
Near -15.7342
13.9 43.1 5.83 1 -6.55 0 0
HR
Far -8.7342
13.9 44.1 5.83 1 -6.55 0 0

Tuned Model K-Values
Asset(SSM) Format
Correspondi
ng Cm of
Cost
Asset SPM K1 K2 K3 K4 K5 K6 K7
Hata231 wrt
Tuned
Model
Near 151.9 43.8 0 0 -13.8 -6.55 0.241

Urban
Far 155.2 44.9 0 0 -13.8 -6.55 0.241
Near 140 40 0 0 -13.8 -6.55 0.39

Indus
Far 144.2 42.4 0 0 -13.8 -6.55 0.39
Near 143.2 43.1 0 0 -13.8 -6.55 1

HR
Far 146.2 44.1 0 0 -13.8 -6.55 1

Indoor Penetration Loss
Based on Field Testing.
Average Average Penetration

Clutter Type
Outdoor(dBm) Indoor(dBm) Loss(dB)
Dense Urban
Urban
Indus

Building Structure Type-MU
Site- BWDI30
Site- BWDI30
INDOOR_2 OUTDOOR_2
INDOOR_1 OUTDOOR_1
Site- BWDI31
INDOOR_1 OUTDOOR_1

Building Structure Type-INDUSTRIAL
INDOOR_1 OUTDOOR_1 INDOOR_2 OUTDOOR_2
Site- TPKR02
Site- TPKR02

Building Structure Type-HR

Comparison With Idea Inputs
Dense
Items Urban Indus
Urban
Idea Inputs
Measured
Value
Difference

LTE Link-budget
Tuned Model-SPM/SSM LB
Link Budget for HSPA
Morphology Dense Urban Urban Indus
UL/DL UL DL UL DL UL DL
Link Parameters
User Environment Indoor Indoor Indoor
Cell Edge Continuous Coverage Service HSUPA HSDPA HSUPA HSDPA HSUPA HSDPA
Cell Edge Service Rate (kbps) 128 1024 128 1024 128 1024
TX
Max. TCH TX Power (dBm) 24.00 43.80 24.00 43.80 24.00 43.80
Power Ratio [%] 60% 60% 60%
Cable Loss (dB) 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00
Body Loss (dB) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Antenna Gain (dBi) 0.00 17.50 0.00 17.50 0.00 17.50
EIRP (dBm) 24.00 60.30 24.00 60.30 24.00 60.30
RX
Thermal Noise Power Density -174 -174 -174 -174 -174 -174
NodeB/UE Noise Figure (dB) 1.80 7.00 1.80 7.00 1.80 7.00
Required Ec/No(dB) -11.00 -3.49 -11.00 -3.49 -11.00 -3.49
Process Gain(dB) 14.77 5.74 14.77 5.74 14.77 5.74
Receiver Sensitivity (dBm) -117.36 -104.64 -117.36 -104.64 -117.36 -104.64
Antenna Gain (dBi) 17.50 0.00 17.50 0.00 17.50 0.00
Cable Loss (dB) 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00
Body Loss (dB) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Target Load 50.00% 75.00% 50.00% 75.00% 50.00% 75.00%
Interference Margin (dB) 3.01 6.31 3.01 6.31 3.01 6.31
Penetration Loss (dB) 22.10 21.35 21.85

Indoor Area Coverage Probability 95.00% 95.00% 95.00%
Indoor Edge Coverage Probability 87.70% 86.10% 86.10%
Slow Fading Standard Deviation (dB) 10.00 8.00 8.00
Fast Fading Margin (dB) 1.80 0.00 1.80 0.00 1.80 0.00
Shadow Fading Margin 11.60 11.60 8.68 8.68 8.68 8.68
HO gain 5.02 0.00 3.95 0.00 3.95 0.00
Indoor Path Loss (dB) 124.36 124.93 126.96 128.60 126.46 128.10
Cell Radius
UE Antenna Height (m) 1.50 1.50 1.50
NodeB Antenna Height (m) 27.33 31.00 32.50
Indoor Cell Radius (km) 0.468 0.485 0.680 0.757 0.830 0.926

LTE Link-budget
Tuned converted to Cost231 LB
Link Parameters
TX
Power Ratio [%] 60% 60% 60%
Cable Loss (dB) 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00
Body Loss (dB) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Antenna Gain (dBi) 0.00 17.50 0.00 17.50 0.00 17.50
EIRP (dBm) 24.00 60.30 24.00 60.30 24.00 60.30
RX
Required Ec/No(dB) -11.00 -3.49 -11.00 -3.49 -11.00 -3.49
Process Gain(dB) 14.77 5.74 14.77 5.74 14.77 5.74
Antenna Gain (dBi) 17.50 0.00 17.50 0.00 17.50 0.00
Cable Loss (dB) 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00
Body Loss (dB) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Target Load 50.00% 75.00% 50.00% 75.00% 50.00% 75.00%

HO gain 5.02 0.00 3.95 0.00 3.95 0.00
Cell Radius

LTE Link-budget
Bidding LB( Costhata231, 2,2,0,-1)
Link Parameters
TX
Power Ratio [%] 60% 60% 60%
Cable Loss (dB) 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00
Body Loss (dB) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Antenna Gain (dBi) 0.00 17.50 0.00 17.50 0.00 17.50
EIRP (dBm) 24.00 60.30 24.00 60.30 24.00 60.30
RX
Required Ec/No(dB) -11.00 -3.49 -11.00 -3.49 -11.00 -3.49
Process Gain(dB) 14.77 5.74 14.77 5.74 14.77 5.74
Antenna Gain (dBi) 17.50 0.00 17.50 0.00 17.50 0.00
Cable Loss (dB) 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00
Body Loss (dB) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Target Load 50.00% 75.00% 50.00% 75.00% 50.00% 75.00%

HO gain 5.02 0.00 3.95 0.00 3.95 0.00
Cell Radius

LTE Link-budget Comparison
1.000
0.900
0.800
0.700
0.600
0.500
Cost Hata231[220-1]
0.400
Tuned SPM
0.300 Tuned Cost Hata
0.200
0.100
0.000
DL-RSCP
DL-RSCP
DL-RSCP
DL-HSPA
DL-HSPA
DL-HSPA
UL-HSPA
UL-HSPA
UL-HSPA
DU MU Indus
DU MU Indus
2100MHZ
UL-HSPA DL-HSPA DL-RSCP UL-HSPA DL-HSPA DL-RSCP UL-HSPA DL-HSPA DL-RSCP
Cost Hata231[220-1] 0.339 0.352 0.223 0.404 0.452 0.369 0.411 0.458 0.375
Tuned SPM 0.468 0.485 0.302 0.680 0.757 0.599 0.830 0.926 0.759
Tuned Cost Hata 0.468 0.485 0.302 0.680 0.757 0.599 0.830 0.926 0.759

THANK YOU!!!
Restricted 27
19-Jun-17 Corp-NWS/Planning/4G
LTE Link-budget
How to select the near transmitter maximum distance-U
Parameter:

LTE Link-budget
How to select the near transmitter maximum distance-Indus
Parameter:

LTE Link-budget
How to select the near transmitter maximum distance-HR
Parameter:

Example Model Tuning Report - 2100Mhz

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Example Model Tuning Report - 2100Mhz

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

CW Drive Test and Model Tuning

Circle Name: RAJASTHAN

19-Jun-17 Corp-NWS/Planning/4G Restricted 2

19-Jun-17 Corp-NWS/Planning/4G Restricted 3

19-Jun-17 Corp-NWS/Planning/4G Restricted 4

Specification CW Transmitter CW Receiver Attach snaps of CW

19-Jun-17 Corp-NWS/Planning/4G Restricted 7

1. Each model should be based on CW test of mutually agreed sites

End : 2134 MHz

Center : 2131.4 MHz

Transmitted Freq. : 2131.4 MHz

Allocated Bandwidth: 5 MHz

19-Jun-17 Corp-NWS/Planning/4G Restricted 9

19-Jun-17 Corp-NWS/Planning/4G Restricted 10

Sites Selected for Drive Test

1 BWDI30 76.8331 28.2043 31 Omni Urban 43 1.55 10 51.45

2 BWDI31 76.86343 28.201825 32 Omni Urban 43 1.55 10 51.45

3 BWDI8 76.8819 28.1458 40 Omni Industrial 43 1.55 10 51.45

4 TPKR02 76.7953 28.1145 45 Omni Industrial 43 1.55 10 51.45

EIRP=Transmitter Output Power Cable Loss + Antenna

Measurement Prediction Prediction Measurement

BWDI30 -8<Difference(dB)<=8 13067 11309 86.54%

BWDI31 -8<Difference(dB)<=8 10383 8875 85.47%

19-Jun-17 Corp-NWS/Planning/4G Restricted 12

Measurement Prediction Measurement Prediction

BWDI08 -8<Difference(dB)<=8 8732 7681 87.96%

TPKR02 -8<Difference(dB)<=8 10844 9392 86.61%

19-Jun-17 Corp-NWS/Planning/4G Restricted 13

Measurement Prediction Measurement Prediction

Total Points Predicted Points

BWDI16 -8<Difference(dB)<=8 5837 4971 85.16%

19-Jun-17 Corp-NWS/Planning/4G Restricted 14

Urban 23,450 -0.4 5.63 5.64 0.87

19-Jun-17 Corp-NWS/Planning/4G Restricted 15

19-Jun-17 Corp-NWS/Planning/4G Restricted 16

Near 151.9 43.8 0 0 -13.8 -6.55 0.241

Near 140 40 0 0 -13.8 -6.55 0.39

Near 143.2 43.1 0 0 -13.8 -6.55 1

19-Jun-17 Corp-NWS/Planning/4G Restricted 17

Average Average Penetration

19-Jun-17 Corp-NWS/Planning/4G Restricted 18

19-Jun-17 Corp-NWS/Planning/4G Restricted 19

INDOOR_1 OUTDOOR_1 INDOOR_2 OUTDOOR_2

INDOOR_1 OUTDOOR_1 INDOOR_2 OUTDOOR_2

19-Jun-17 Corp-NWS/Planning/4G Restricted 20

INDOOR_1 OUTDOOR_1 INDOOR_2 OUTDOOR_2

19-Jun-17 Corp-NWS/Planning/4G Restricted 21

19-Jun-17 Corp-NWS/Planning/4G Restricted 22

Penetration Loss (dB) 22.10 21.35 21.85

19-Jun-17 Corp-NWS/Planning/4G Restricted 23

Penetration Loss (dB) 22.10 21.35 21.85

19-Jun-17 Corp-NWS/Planning/4G Restricted 24

Penetration Loss (dB) 22.10 21.35 21.85

19-Jun-17 Corp-NWS/Planning/4G Restricted 25

19-Jun-17 Corp-NWS/Planning/4G Restricted 26

19-Jun-17 Corp-NWS/Planning/4G Restricted 28

19-Jun-17 Corp-NWS/Planning/4G Restricted 29

19-Jun-17 Corp-NWS/Planning/4G Restricted 30

You might also like