You are on page 1of 55

T A N J U N G P U R A U N IV E R S IT Y

Civil Department Engineering Faculty

Lesson3: Lateral Earth Pressure

Dr.Ing. Eka Priadi

Jalan Ahmad Yani Pontianak - 78124 01


T A N J U N G P U R A U N IV E R S IT Y
Civil Department Engineering Faculty

3.1 Introduction

A retaining wall is a wall that provides lateral support for a vertical or near-
vertical slope of soil. The most common types of retaining wall may be
classified as follows:

1. Gravity retaining walls


2. Semigravity retaining walls
3. Cantilever retaining walls
4. Counterfort retaining walls

Jalan Ahmad Yani Pontianak - 78124 02


T A N J U N G P U R A U N IV E R S IT Y
Civil Department Engineering Faculty

Figure 1 Types of retaining wall

Jalan Ahmad Yani Pontianak - 78124 03


T A N J U N G P U R A U N IV E R S IT Y
Civil Department Engineering Faculty

Gravity retaining walls (Figure 1a) are constructed with plain concrete or
stone masonry. These walls depend on their own weight and any soil resting
on the masonry for their stability. This type of construction is not very
economical for high walls.

In many cases, a small amount of steel may be used for the construction of
gravity walls, thereby minimizing the size of the wall sections. Such walls
are generally referred to as Semigravity walls (Figure 1b).

Cantilever retaining walls (Figure 1c) are made of reinforced concrete that
consists of a thin stem and a base slab. This type of wall is economical up
to a height of about 8 m.

Jalan Ahmad Yani Pontianak - 78124 04


T A N J U N G P U R A U N IV E R S IT Y
Civil Department Engineering Faculty

Counterfort retaining walls (Figure 1d) are similar to cantilever walls


except for the fact that, at regular intervals, they have thin vertical concrete
slabs known as counterforts that tie the wall and the base slab together. The
purpose of the counterforts is to reduce the shear and the bending
moments.

There are two phases in the design of a retaining wall. First, with the lateral
earth pressure known, the structure as a whole is checked for stability. This
includes checking for possible overturning, sliding, and bearing capacity
failures. Second, each component of the structure is checked for adequate
strength, and the steel reinforcement of each component is determined.

Jalan Ahmad Yani Pontianak - 78124 05


T A N J U N G P U R A U N IV E R S IT Y
Civil Department Engineering Faculty

3.2 Lateral Earth Pressure At Rest

Consider a vertical wall of height H, as shown in Figure 2, retaining a soil


having a unit weight of g. A uniformly distributed load, q/unit area, is also
applied at the ground surface. The shear strength, s, of the soil may be
given by the equation

s = c + s tan f

where c = cohesion
f = angle of friction
s = effective normal stress

Jalan Ahmad Yani Pontianak - 78124 06


T A N J U N G P U R A U N IV E R S IT Y
Civil Department Engineering Faculty

Figure 2 At-rest earth pressure

Jalan Ahmad Yani Pontianak - 78124 07


T A N J U N G P U R A U N IV E R S IT Y
Civil Department Engineering Faculty

At any depth z below the ground surface, the vertical stress below the
ground surface can be given as

sv = q + gz (1)

If the wall is not allowed to move at all either way from the soil mass or into
the soil mass (for example, zero horizontal strain), the lateral pressure at a
depth z can be given as

sh = K0 sv + u (2)

where u = pore water pressure


K0 = coefficient of at-rest earth pressure

Jalan Ahmad Yani Pontianak - 78124 08


T A N J U N G P U R A U N IV E R S IT Y
Civil Department Engineering Faculty

For normally consolidated granular soil, the relation for K0 is

K0 1 sin f (3)

Note that the preceding equation is an empirical approximation.

For normally consolidated clays, the coefficient of earth pressure at rest can
be approximated as follows (Brooker and Ireland, 1965):

K0 0.95 sin f (4)

where f = drained friction angle

Jalan Ahmad Yani Pontianak - 78124 09


T A N J U N G P U R A U N IV E R S IT Y
Civil Department Engineering Faculty

Based on the experimental results of Brooker and Ireland (1965), the value
of K0 for normally consolidated clays can be approximately correlated with
plasticity index (PI) as

K0 = 0.4 + 0.007(PI) (for PI between 0 and 40) (5)

K0 = 0.64 + 0.001(PI) (for PI between 40 and 80) (6)

For overconsolidated clays

K0(overconsolidated) K0(normally consolidated)OCR (7)

where OCR = overconsolidation ratio

Jalan Ahmad Yani Pontianak - 78124 10


T A N J U N G P U R A U N IV E R S IT Y
Civil Department Engineering Faculty

With a properly selected value of the at-rest earth pressure coefficient, Eq.
(5.2) can be used to determine the variation of lateral earth pressure with
depth, z. Figure 2(b) shows the variation of sh with depth for the wall shown
in Figure 2(a).

P0 = P1 + P2 = qK0 H + gH2 K0 (8)

where P1 = area of rectangle 1


P2 = area of triangle 2

The location of the line of action of the resultant force, P0, can be obtained
by taking the moment about the bottom of the wall. Thus

Jalan Ahmad Yani Pontianak - 78124 11


T A N J U N G P U R A U N IV E R S IT Y
Civil Department Engineering Faculty

H H
P1 P2
z 3
2
P0 (9)

If the water table is located at a certain depth, z H, the at-rest pressure


diagram shown in Figure 2(b) will have to be somewhat modified. This is
shown in Figure 3. Let the effective unit weight of soil below the water be
equal to g (that is, gsat gw). For this condition

At z = 0, sh = K0 sv = K0 q

At z = H1, sh = K0 sv = K0(q + gH1)

At z = H2, sh = K0 sv = K0(q + gH1 + gH2)

Jalan Ahmad Yani Pontianak - 78124 12


T A N J U N G P U R A U N IV E R S IT Y
Civil Department Engineering Faculty

Figure 3

Jalan Ahmad Yani Pontianak - 78124 13


T A N J U N G P U R A U N IV E R S IT Y
Civil Department Engineering Faculty

Note that in the preceding equations, sv and sh are effective vertical and
horizontal pressures.

The hydrostatic pressure, u, is

At z = 0, u=0

At z = H1, u=0

At z = H2, u = H2 gw

The variation of sh and u with depth is shown in Figure 3(b). Hence the total
force per unit length of the wall can be determined from the area of the
pressure diagram. Thus

Jalan Ahmad Yani Pontianak - 78124 14


T A N J U N G P U R A U N IV E R S IT Y
Civil Department Engineering Faculty

P0 = A1 + A2 + A3 + A4 + A5

where A = area of the pressure diagram

So

P0 = K0 qH1 + K0 gH21 + K0 (q + gH1)H2


+ K0 gH22 + gwH22 (10)

Sherif, Fang, and Sherif (1984) have shown by several laboratory model
tests that Eq. (3) gives good results for estimating the lateral earth pressure
at rest for loose sands. However, for compacted dense sand, it grossly
underestimates the value of K0. For that reason, they proposed the following
modified relationship for K0 :

Jalan Ahmad Yani Pontianak - 78124 15


T A N J U N G P U R A U N IV E R S IT Y
Civil Department Engineering Faculty

gd
K 0 1 sin f
1 5.5 (11)
g d(min)

where gd = in situ unit weight of sand


gd(min) = minimum possible dry unit weight of sand

Jalan Ahmad Yani Pontianak - 78124 16


T A N J U N G P U R A U N IV E R S IT Y
Civil Department Engineering Faculty

Example 1

A retaining wall is 10 ft high. The backfill is dense sand. Given: f = 40, gd =


108 lb/ft3, and gd(min) = 97 lb/ft3. Determine the lateral earth force at rest per
unit length of the wall. [Use Eq. (11).]

Figure 4

Jalan Ahmad Yani Pontianak - 78124 17


T A N J U N G P U R A U N IV E R S IT Y
Civil Department Engineering Faculty

Solution

Refer to Figure 4. From Eq. (11)

gd
K 0 1 sin f
1 5.5
g d(min)

108
1 sin 40 1 5.5
97

0.357 0.634 0.991

Jalan Ahmad Yani Pontianak - 78124 18


T A N J U N G P U R A U N IV E R S IT Y
Civil Department Engineering Faculty

At z = 0, sv = 0, sh = 0

At z = 10 ft, sv = (10)(108) = 1080 lb/ft2


sh = K0 sv = (0.991)(1080) = 1070.3 lb/ft2

The at-rest force per unit length of the wall is the area of the triangle shown
in Figure 4(b). So

P0 = (1070.3)(10) = 5351.5 lb/ft.

Jalan Ahmad Yani Pontianak - 78124 19


T A N J U N G P U R A U N IV E R S IT Y
Civil Department Engineering Faculty

Example 2

For the retaining wall shown in Figure 5(a), determine the lateral earth force
at rest per unit length of the wall. Also determine the location of the resultant
earth pressure.

Figure 5

Jalan Ahmad Yani Pontianak - 78124 20


T A N J U N G P U R A U N IV E R S IT Y
Civil Department Engineering Faculty

Solution

K0 = 1 sin f = 1 sin 30 = 0.5

At z = 0, sv = 0 ; sh = 0

At z = 2.5 m, sv = (16.5)(2.5) = 41.25 kN/m2 ;


sh = K0 sv = (0.5)(41.25) = 20.63 kN/m2

At z = 5 m, sv = (16.5)(2.5) + (19.3 9.81) 2.5


= 64.98 kN/m2,
sh = K0 sv = (0.5)(64.98) = 32.49 kN/m2

Jalan Ahmad Yani Pontianak - 78124 21


T A N J U N G P U R A U N IV E R S IT Y
Civil Department Engineering Faculty

The hydrostatic pressure distribution is as follows:

From z = 0 to z = 2.5 m, u=0

At z = 5 m, u = gw (2.5) = (9.81)(2.5)
= 24.53 kN/m2

The pressure distribution for the wall is shown in Figure 5(b).

The total force per unit length of the wall can be determined from the area of
the pressure diagram, or

P0 = Area 1 + Area 2 + Area 3 + Area 4


= (2.5)(20.63) + (2.5)(20.63) + (2.5)(32.49 20.63)
+ (2.5)(24.53) = 122.85 kN/m

Jalan Ahmad Yani Pontianak - 78124 22


T A N J U N G P U R A U N IV E R S IT Y
Civil Department Engineering Faculty

The location of the center of pressure measured from the bottom of the wall
(ponit O) =

Area 1 2.5 2.5 Area 2 2.5 Area 3 Area 4 2.5


z 3 2 3
P0


25.788 3.33 51.575 1.25 14.825 30.663 0.833
122 .85

85.87 64.47 37.89


1.53 m
122 .85

Jalan Ahmad Yani Pontianak - 78124 23


T A N J U N G P U R A U N IV E R S IT Y
Civil Department Engineering Faculty

3.3 Rankine Active Earth Pressure

The lateral earth pressure condition described in Section 3.2 involves walls
that do not yield at all. However, if a wall tends to move away from the soil a
distance Dx, as shown in Figure 6(a), the soil pressure on the wall at any
given depth will decrease.

For a wall that is frictionless, the horizontal stress, sh, at a depth z will be
equal to K0 sv (= K0 gz) when Dx is equal to zero. However, with Dx 0, sh
will be less than K0 sv.

Jalan Ahmad Yani Pontianak - 78124 24


T A N J U N G P U R A U N IV E R S IT Y
Civil Department Engineering Faculty

Eq. (16)

Figure 6 Rankine active pressure

Jalan Ahmad Yani Pontianak - 78124 25


T A N J U N G P U R A U N IV E R S IT Y
Civil Department Engineering Faculty

The Mohrs circle corresponding to wall displacements of Dx = 0 and Dx 0


are shown as circles a and b, respectively, in Figure 6(b). If the
displacement of the wall, Dx, continues to increase, there will be a time
when the corresponding Mohrs circle will just touch the Mohr-Coulomb
failure envelope defined by the equation

s = c + s tan f

The circle is marked c in Figure 6(b). It represents the failure condition in


the soil mass ; the horizontal stress at this time is equal to sa. This
horizontal stress, sa, is referred to as the Rankine active pressure. The slip
lines (failure planes) in the soil mass at this time will make angles of (45 +
f/2) with the horizontal. This is shown in Figure 6(a).

Jalan Ahmad Yani Pontianak - 78124 26


T A N J U N G P U R A U N IV E R S IT Y
Civil Department Engineering Faculty

The equation relating the principal stresses for a Mohrs circle that touches
the Mohr-Coulomb failure envelope can be given by

s1 = s3 tan2 (45 + f/2) + 2c tan (45 + f/2)

For the Mohrs circle c in Figure 6(b),

Major principal stress, s1 = sv

and

Minor principal stress, s3 = sa

Jalan Ahmad Yani Pontianak - 78124 27


T A N J U N G P U R A U N IV E R S IT Y
Civil Department Engineering Faculty

Thus

sv = sa tan2 (45 + f/2) + 2c tan (45 + f/2)

sv c
sa
f f
tan2 45 tan 45
2 2

Jalan Ahmad Yani Pontianak - 78124 28


T A N J U N G P U R A U N IV E R S IT Y
Civil Department Engineering Faculty

or

sa = sv tan2 (45 f/2) 2c tan (45 f/2)

s v Ka 2c Ka (12)

where Ka = tan2 (45 f/2) = Rankine active pressure coefficient (Table 1)

Jalan Ahmad Yani Pontianak - 78124 29


T A N J U N G P U R A U N IV E R S IT Y
Civil Department Engineering Faculty

Table 1 Variation of Rankine Ka

Jalan Ahmad Yani Pontianak - 78124 30


T A N J U N G P U R A U N IV E R S IT Y
Civil Department Engineering Faculty

The variation of the active pressure with depth for the wall shown in Figure
6(a) is given in Figure 6(c).

Note that sv = 0 at z = 0,
sv = gH at z = H

The pressure distribution shows that at z = 0, the active pressure is equal to


2cKa, indicating tensile stress.

This tensile stress decrease with depth and becomes zero at a depth z = zc,
or

g zc Ka 2c Ka 0

2c
zc (13)
g Ka

Jalan Ahmad Yani Pontianak - 78124 31


T A N J U N G P U R A U N IV E R S IT Y
Civil Department Engineering Faculty

The depth zc is usually referred to as the depth of tensile crack, because the
tensile stress in the soil will eventually cause a crack along the soil-wall
interface.

Thus the total Rankine active force per unit length of the wall before the
tensile crack occurs is equal to

H H H
Pa s a dz g z Ka dz 2c Ka dz
0 0 0

1 2 g H 2 K a 2cH K a (14)

Jalan Ahmad Yani Pontianak - 78124 32


T A N J U N G P U R A U N IV E R S IT Y
Civil Department Engineering Faculty

After the occurrence of the tensile crack, the force on the wall will be caused
only by the pressure distribution between depths z = zc to z = H, as shown
by the hatched area in Figure 6(c), it can be expressed as

Pa
1
2

H zc g HKa 2c Ka (15)

1 2c
Pa H
2

g HK a 2c K a
g K a
(16)

Jalan Ahmad Yani Pontianak - 78124 33


T A N J U N G P U R A U N IV E R S IT Y
Civil Department Engineering Faculty

For calculation purposes in some retaining wall design problems, a


cohesive soil backfill is replaced by an assumed granular soil with a
triangular Rankine active pressure diagram with

sa = 0 at z = 0
sa = svKa 2cKa at z = H (see Figure 7)

In such a case, the assumed active force per unit length of the wall is

Pa 1 2 H g HK a 2c K a 1 2 g H 2K a cH K a (17)

Jalan Ahmad Yani Pontianak - 78124 34


T A N J U N G P U R A U N IV E R S IT Y
Civil Department Engineering Faculty

Figure 7 Assumed active pressure diagram for clay backfill behind a retaining wall

However, the active earth pressure condition will be reached only if the wall
is allowed to yield sufficiently. The amount of outward displacement of the
wall necessary is about 0.001H to 0.004H for granular soil backfills and
about 0.01H to 0.04H for cohesive soil backfills.

Jalan Ahmad Yani Pontianak - 78124 35


T A N J U N G P U R A U N IV E R S IT Y
Civil Department Engineering Faculty

Example 3

A 6-m retaining wall is to support a soil with unit weight g = 17.4 kN/m3, soil
friction angle f = 26, and cohesion c = 14.36 kN/m2. Determine the
Rankine active force per unit length of the wall both before and after the
tensile crack occurs, and determine the line of action of the resultant in both
cases.

Jalan Ahmad Yani Pontianak - 78124 36


T A N J U N G P U R A U N IV E R S IT Y
Civil Department Engineering Faculty

Solution

Given: f = 26. So
Ka = tan2 (45 f/2) = tan2 (45 13) = 0.39
Ka = 0.625
sa = g HKa 2cKa

Referring to Figure 6(c),


At z = 0, sa = 2cKa = 2(14.36)(0.625) = 17.95 kN/m2
At z = 6 m, sa = (17.4)(6)(0.39) 2(14.36)(0.625) = 22.77 kN/m2

Active force before the occurrence of tensile crack: Eq. (14)

Pa = g H2Ka 2cHKa
= (6)(40.72) (6)(17.95) = 122.16 107.7 = 14.46 kN/m

Jalan Ahmad Yani Pontianak - 78124 37


T A N J U N G P U R A U N IV E R S IT Y
Civil Department Engineering Faculty

The line of action of the resultant can be determined by taking the moment
of the area of the pressure diagrams about the bottom of the wall, or

6 6
Pa z 122 .16 107 .7
3 2

244 .32 323 .1


z 5.448 m
14.46

Active force after the occurrence of tensile crack: Eq. (13)

2c 214.36
zc 2.64 m
g Ka 17.40.625

Jalan Ahmad Yani Pontianak - 78124 38


T A N J U N G P U R A U N IV E R S IT Y
Civil Department Engineering Faculty

Using Eq. (15)

Pa 1 H zc g HK a 2c Ka 1 6 2.64 22.77 38.25 kN/m


2 2

The line of action of the resultant will be located at a height of

z H zc 3 6 2.64 3 1.12 m

Jalan Ahmad Yani Pontianak - 78124 39


T A N J U N G P U R A U N IV E R S IT Y
Civil Department Engineering Faculty

Example 4

Refer to Figure 8(a). Assume that the wall can yield sufficiently and
determine the Rankine active force per unit length of the wall. Also
determine the location of the resultant line of action.

Figure 8

Jalan Ahmad Yani Pontianak - 78124 40


T A N J U N G P U R A U N IV E R S IT Y
Civil Department Engineering Faculty

Solution

If the cohesion, c, is equal to zero

sa = svKa

For the top soil layer, f1 = 30,so

Ka(1) = tan2 (45 f1/2) = tan2 (45 15) = 1/3

Similarly, for the bottom soil layer, f2 = 36, and

Ka(2) = tan2 (45 36/2) = 0.26

Jalan Ahmad Yani Pontianak - 78124 41


T A N J U N G P U R A U N IV E R S IT Y
Civil Department Engineering Faculty

Because of the presence of the water table, the effective lateral pressure
and the hydrostatic pressure have to be calculated separately.

At z = 0, sv = 0, sa = 0
At z =3 m, sv = gz = (16)(3) = 48 kN/m2

At this depth, for the top soil layer

sa = Ka(1)sv = (1/3)(48) = 16 kN/m2

Similarly, for the bottom soil layer

sa = Ka(2)sv = (0.26)(48) = 12.48 kN/m2

Jalan Ahmad Yani Pontianak - 78124 42


T A N J U N G P U R A U N IV E R S IT Y
Civil Department Engineering Faculty

At z = 6 m, sv = (g)(3) + (gsat gw)(3) = (16)(3) + (19 9.81)(3)


= 48 + 27.57 = 75.57 kN/m2

sa = Ka(2)sv = (0.26)(75.57) = 19.65 kN/m2

The hydrostatic pressure, u, is zero from z = 0 to z = 3 m. At z = 6 m, u =


3gw = 3(9.81) = 29.43 kN/m2.

The pressure distribution diagram is plotted in Figure 8(b). The force per
unit length

Pa = Area 1 + Area 2 + Area 3 + Area 4


= (3)(16) + (3)(12.48) + (3)(19.65 12.48) +
(3)(29.43)
= 24 + 37.44 + 10.76 + 44.15 = 116.35 kN/m

Jalan Ahmad Yani Pontianak - 78124 43


T A N J U N G P U R A U N IV E R S IT Y
Civil Department Engineering Faculty

The distance of the line of action of the resultant from the bottom of the wall
( z ) can be determined by taking the moments about the bottom of the wall
(point O in Figure 8(a)), or

24 3 3 37.44 3 10.76 3 44.15 3


z 3 2 3 3
116 .35

96 56.15 10.76 44.15


1.779 m
116 .35

Jalan Ahmad Yani Pontianak - 78124 44


T A N J U N G P U R A U N IV E R S IT Y
Civil Department Engineering Faculty

Example 5

Refer to Example 4. Other quantities remaining the same, assume that, in


the top layer, c1 = 24 kN/m2 (not zero as in Example 4). Determine Pa after
the occurrence of the tensile crack.

Solution

2c1 224
zc 5 .2 m
g K a1 16 1 3

Pa = Area 2 + Area 3 + Area 4


= 37.44 + 10.76 + 44.15 = 92.35 kN/m

Jalan Ahmad Yani Pontianak - 78124 45


T A N J U N G P U R A U N IV E R S IT Y
Civil Department Engineering Faculty

3.4 Coulombs Active Earth Pressure

The Rankine active earth pressure calculations discussed in the preceding


section were based on the assumption that the wall is frictionless. In 1776,
Coulomb proposed a theory to calculate the lateral earth pressure on a
retaining wall with granular soil backfill. This theory takes wall friction into
consideration.

To apply Coulombs active earth pressure theory, let us consider a retaining


wall with its back face inclined at an angle b with the horizontal as shown in
Figure 9(a). The backfill is a granular soil that slopes at an angle a with the
horizontal. Also, let d be the angle of friction between the soil and the wall
(that is, angle of wall friction).

Jalan Ahmad Yani Pontianak - 78124 46


T A N J U N G P U R A U N IV E R S IT Y
Civil Department Engineering Faculty

Figure 9 Coulombs active pressure

Jalan Ahmad Yani Pontianak - 78124 47


T A N J U N G P U R A U N IV E R S IT Y
Civil Department Engineering Faculty

In an active pressure condition, the wall will move away from the soil mass
(that is, to the left in Figure 9(a)). Coulomb assumed that, in such a case,
the failure surface in the soil mass would be a plane (such as BC1, BC2,
.). So, to find the active force in our example, consider a possible soil
failure wedge ABC1. The forces acting on this wedge, ABC1 (per unit length
at right angles to the cross section shown), are as follows:
1. Weight of the wedge, W.
2. The resultant, R, of the normal and resisting shear forces along the
surface, BC1. The force R will be inclined at an angle f to the normal
drawn to the surface BC1.
3. The active force per unit length of the wall, Pa. The force Pa will be
inclined at an angle d to the normal drown to the back face of the
wall.

Jalan Ahmad Yani Pontianak - 78124 48


T A N J U N G P U R A U N IV E R S IT Y
Civil Department Engineering Faculty

For equilibrium purposes, a force triangle can be drawn. This is shown in


Figure 9(b). Note that q1 is the angle that BC1 makes with the horizontal.
Because the magnitude of W as well as the directions of all three forces are
known, the value of Pa can now be determined. In a similar manner, one can
determine the active forces of other trial wedges, such as ABC2, ABC3,

The maximum value of Pa thus determined is Coulombs active force (see


top part of Figure 9(a). This can be expressed as

Pa 1 2 Ka g H 2 (18)

Jalan Ahmad Yani Pontianak - 78124 49


T A N J U N G P U R A U N IV E R S IT Y
Civil Department Engineering Faculty

Ka = Coulombs active earth pressure coefficient

sin2 f
(19)
sin f d . sin f a
2

sin2 b . sin b d 1
sin b d . sin a b

H = height of the wall

The value of the active earth pressure coefficient, Ka, for a vertical retaining
wall (b = 90) with horizontal backfill (a = 0) are given in Table 2. Note that
the line of action of the resultant (Pa) will act at a distance of H/3 above the
base of the wall and will be inclined at an angle d to the normal drawn to the
back of the wall.

Jalan Ahmad Yani Pontianak - 78124 50


T A N J U N G P U R A U N IV E R S IT Y
Civil Department Engineering Faculty

Table 2 Values of Ka [Eq. (19)] for b = 90, a = 0

Jalan Ahmad Yani Pontianak - 78124 51


T A N J U N G P U R A U N IV E R S IT Y
Civil Department Engineering Faculty

In the actual design of retaining walls, the value of the wall friction angle, d,
is assumed to be between f/2 and 2/3f. The active earth pressure
coefficients for various values of f, a, and b with d = 2/3f are given in Table
3. This is a very useful table for design considerations.

If a uniform surcharge of intensity q is located above the backfill as shown in


Figure 10, the active force, Pa, can be calculated as

Pa 1 2 Ka g eq H 2 (20)


Eq. (19)

sin b 2q
g eq g H
(21)
sin b a

Jalan Ahmad Yani Pontianak - 78124 52


T A N J U N G P U R A U N IV E R S IT Y
Civil Department Engineering Faculty

Table 3 Values of Ka [Eq. (19)] (note: d = 2/3f in all cases)

Jalan Ahmad Yani Pontianak - 78124 53


T A N J U N G P U R A U N IV E R S IT Y
Civil Department Engineering Faculty

Figure 10 Coulombs active pressure with a surcharge on the backfill

Jalan Ahmad Yani Pontianak - 78124 54


T A N J U N G P U R A U N IV E R S IT Y
Civil Department Engineering Faculty

Example 6

Consider the retaining wall shown in Figure 9(a). Given: H = 4.6 m ; unit
weight of soil = 16.5 kN/m3 ; angle of friction of soil = 30 ; wall friction
angle, d = 2/3f ; soil cohesion, c = 0 ; a = 0, and b = 90. Calculate the
Coulombs active force per unit length of the wall.

Solution

Pa = g H2Ka

From Table 2, for a = 0, b = 90, f = 30, and d = 2/3f = 20, Ka = 0.297.


Hence,

Pa = (16.5)(4.6)2(0.297) = 51.85 kN/m

Jalan Ahmad Yani Pontianak - 78124 55

You might also like