Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Civilization and
Modern
Consciousness
from the West
Lecture 8 Western
Enlightenment II: Democracy
and Politics
Instructor: Dr. Terence Leung
“Origins” of Western Modern
Thought
The concept of individual freedom—has been
the critical driving force of Western civilization.
It is arguably what differentiates the West from
the civilizations of the East, some of which
were for an extended period technologically
and economically superior to the West.
The history of individual freedom is one that
begins in the West with the Greek city-states
(polis) [城邦].
“Origins” of Western Modern
Thought
“Origins” of Western Modern
Thought
Myth of Continuity – The Origins of Greek Thought:
According to Jean-Pierre Vernant, the advent of city-
state (polis) has changed the social life and human
relations in Greece and generates democratic
system民主制度 and self-governing body:
1. the system of polis implies the significance of
speech over all other instruments of power
- speech becomes the political tool, the key to all
authority and the means of commanding and
dominating others
- city creates a public to which the politicians can
address and speech becomes open debate
- the art of politics is the art of oratory, the technique
of persuasion, and it lays down the logic of verifiable
truth
“Origins” of Western Modern
Thought
2. the polis helps create a public domain, an area of
common interest and open practices; and it leads to
democratization and disclosure
- knowledge and values are brought to the public
view and submitted to public criticism
- speech is the instrument of the city’s political life,
while writing becomes the medium of a common
culture
- the writing down of the laws ensures their
permanence and stability and turns them into public
property
- individuals make their knowledge public by means
of writing
- Knowledge then becomes the common property of
the city, a standard that would be applicable to all
“Origins” of Western Modern
Thought
3. polis creates a unity among the people
from different origins, ranks and functions
- citizens are united in the same community,
replacing the hierarchical relations of
submission and dominance
- the concept isonomia 自由-平等: equal
participation of all citizens in the exercise of
power
- the power of individual must yield to the law
of the group – the egalitarian spirit 平均主義
and the supremacy of law and order
The “Ruptures” of Western
Enlightenment
The story of ‘origin’ is always a story of
myth, it is always from the present that we
look back at our origin.
In other words, the origin is constructed by
our present perspective.
The first important affirmation of the
historical present within the trajectory of
Western civilization is best exemplified in
the Enlightenment project.
The “Ruptures” of Western
Enlightenment
What Is Enlightenment 啟蒙運動?
- name given to the flowering of Western
philosophical thought after 1700 (i.e. En-
lightenment)
- translated Renaissance notions of ‘self’ into
coherent social and political philosophy
- credited with creating dramatic political
transformations
- Major Enlightenment thinkers: Rousseau 盧 梭 ,
Voltaire伏爾泰, Goethe歌德, Kant康德, Schiller席勒,
Montesquieu孟德斯鳩, Diderot狄德羅
The “Ruptures” of Western
Enlightenment
The Enlightenment Ideals
1. Human autonomy
2. The importance of reason
3. Progress
4. Secularism
5. The centrality of economy to politics
6. The ideal of popular government
The “Ruptures” of Western
Enlightenment
啟 蒙 運 動 , 又 稱 啟 蒙 時代 與 理 性 時 代 ( Age of
Reason),是指在17世紀及18世紀歐洲地區發生
的一場哲學及文化運動,該運動相信理性發展知識
可以解決人類實存的基本問題。
人類歷史從此展開在思潮、知識及媒體上的「啟
蒙」,開啟現代化和現代性的發展歴程。
德意志哲學家康德(Kant)以「敢於求知」(dare
to know)的啟蒙精神來闡述人類的理性擔當。
康德認為啟蒙運動是人類的最終解放時代,將人類
意識從不成熟的無知和錯誤狀態中解放。
The “Ruptures” of Western
Enlightenment
在一般歷史時代分期上,接續文藝復興的是啟蒙運
動時期。
啟蒙時代不同於過往以神學權威為主作為知識權威
與傳統教條,而是相信理性並敢於求知,認為科學
和藝術的知識的理性發展可以改進人類生活。
承接17世紀的科學宇宙觀及以理性尋找知識的方法,
啟蒙運動相信普世原則及普世價值可以在理性的基
礎上建立,對傳統存有的社會習俗和政治體制以理
性方法檢驗並改進,產生出啟蒙時代包含了自由與
平等概念的世界觀。
The “Ruptures” of Western
Enlightenment
14世紀之「文藝復興時期」
歐洲邁向現代化的里程碑,即以中世紀(14-16 世
紀)所發生的文藝復興運動作為轉捩點。
「 復 興 」 (Renaissance) 之 意 為 「 再 生 」
(Rebirth),其主要的內涵是希望能重生古希臘理
性主義氛圍之下的自由與求知精神,也就是對教
會無邊壟罩的解放與知識的創造。
The “Ruptures” of Western
Enlightenment
18 世紀之「啟蒙運動」
18 世紀的法國,在經過了路易十四時期多年的戰爭
後,經濟大受打擊,因此人 們開始對君權神授說産生
質疑,並開始出現理性思考的思想家,也被稱為「理
性 時代」。
當時的哲學家多以理性思考視為主要重點,並開始摒
棄宗教的迷信觀點。
啟蒙運動的歷史地位及其對現代國際社會的影響:
啟蒙時代的思想家多提出創立民主、共和政體的思
想,例如孟德斯鳩主張的三權 分立、盧梭的「社會
契約論」、洛克的「政府論」。啟蒙時代的思想基
礎被之後的 美國獨立宣言與法國人權宣言所採用。
影響所及,造就當今民主國家的盛行。
The “Ruptures” of Western
Enlightenment
啟蒙運動的代表人物 孟德斯鳩(Montesquieu)提出三權
分立的理論影響了美國憲法、法國憲法、普魯士法典及
後來的現代各國憲法。
伏爾泰(Voltaire)以理性主義和懷疑主義為基礎,強調寬
容和個人自由,並抨擊教 會限制人的思想言論自由。
盧梭(Rousseau)質疑啟蒙運動的理性原則與進步觀念,
開啟了後來的浪漫運動,他排斥各種政治結構,認為人
民的普遍意志才是最優先的考慮。
狄德羅(Diderot)將百科全書(Encyclopedia)作為啟蒙
運動的代言者,他要讓這套書作為當代知識的總集成,
象徵著高級知識分子對於啟蒙愚昧無知人們的工具,並
展現出人類在知識上的進步。
The “Ruptures” of Western
Enlightenment
約翰·洛克(John Locke)是英國的哲學家。在知識論上,
洛克與喬治·貝克萊、大衛·休謨三人被列為英國經驗主義的
代表人物,但他也在社會契約理論上做出重要貢獻。
他發展出了一套與湯瑪斯·霍布斯的自然狀態不同的理論,
主張政府只有在取得被統治者的同意,並且保障人民擁有
生命、自由、和財產的自然權利時,其統治才有正當性。
洛克相信只有在取得被統治者的同意時,社會契約才會成
立,如果缺乏了這種同意,那麼人民便有推翻政府的權利。
約翰·洛克將國家權力分為立法權、行政權和對外權,並主
張立法權與行政權的分立,行政權與對外權的統一;立法
權是國家最高權力。
洛克的思想對於後代政治哲學的發展產生巨大影響,並且
被廣泛視為是啟蒙時代最具影響力的思想家和自由主義者。
他的著作也大為影響了伏爾泰和盧梭,以及許多蘇格蘭啟
蒙運動的思想家和美國開國元勳。他的理論被反映在美國
的獨立宣言上。
The “Ruptures” of Western
Enlightenment
The “Ruptures” of Western
Enlightenment
沙龍與公共領域的形成
啟蒙運動與法國中產階級的興起息息相關。起初,願意在
沙龍(salon,原意為大廳)招待哲士的主要是法國的貴族,
特別是貴族的遺孀。她們擁有龐大的遺產,喜好知識,因
此願意花大筆的金錢,聘請哲士們成為她們的入幕之賓。
包括伏爾泰、盧梭等,都曾接受她們的資助。隨著中產階
級的崛起,這些想要附庸風雅的中產階級也開始舉辦沙龍,
以便提高他們的社會地位以及名聲。
在中產階級的贊助下,啟蒙哲士們逐漸形成了類似於今日
的學術團體,有學者將其命名為「文人共和國」,而這也
是二十世紀法蘭克福學派社會學家哈伯瑪斯所謂的「公共
領域」的雛形。
這些哲士們在沙龍中發表自己對於政治、經濟,以及社會
的各種批判與論述,建立起歐洲最早的社會輿論。
The “Ruptures” of Western
Enlightenment
公共領域(public sphere)的形成,獲得中產階級的認同,中產
階級找到發聲的管道,讓他們的意見與言論有發表的空間。隨
著時間的發展,除了「偉大的」啟蒙哲士之外,又再形成了一
群被稱為「清寒文人」的團體。
根據法國文化史學家侯杰.夏提葉(Roger Chartier)的研究,
清寒文人對於法國大革命的貢獻,可能高於啟蒙哲士,因為他
們所提供的不是難以理解的哲學理論,而是將這些哲學理論加
以消化,轉變成更貼近中產階級的知識架構,使他們能快速的
了解啟蒙哲士的政治哲學,並與之產生共鳴。
The “Ruptures” of Western
Enlightenment
Reason is the supreme principle至上的原則
The universality of science (positivism)
against any kind of irrationalism; new
freedom – liberation from the old beliefs,
superstitions 迷 信 , fear (i.e. dis-
enchantment 去魅)
New type of subject (autonomous, self-
determining 自 我 決 定 ) Man becomes
the new ruler of the world
The “Ruptures” of Western
Enlightenment
The Enlightenment subject:
Persons as unique unified agents
Cartesian subject
Descartes 笛卡爾 ‘I think, therefore I am’(
我思故我在)
Rational, conscious individual subject
The “Ruptures” of Western
Enlightenment
Kant’s essay “What Is Enlightenment?” (1784)
“Dare to know!” – Have the courage to use your own
reason against any kind of imposed or external
authority
A distinction between public and private, between
the realm of reason and that of obedience
The use of reason belongs to the public realm, while
obedience is a private matter
The “Ruptures” of Western
Enlightenment
A man of reason is a universal human
being and addresses a universal
audience, i.e. mankind
The division (between public and private
uses of reason) is inherent in every
individual e.g. army officer obeys and
man of reason questions the military
The “Ruptures” of Western
Enlightenment
Public use of reason: paying taxes while being
able to argue about how much to pay
Private use of reason: not blind obedience 不
盲從, but following orders and making use of
your reason within established rules
Political model is a contract of rational
despotism 理 性 的 專 制 主 義 : rulers can
guarantee our obedience by offering us
‘public and free use of autonomous reason’
Rethinking the Enlightenment
Twenty-century French philosopher Michel
Foucault ( 福 柯 ) analyzes ‘What Is
Enlightenment?’ by the German philosopher
Immanuel Kant with the following conclusions
about Enlightenment as: