Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Disregard to compatibility torsion in the design will often lead to extensive cracking, but
generally will not cause collapse. An internal readjustment of forces will take place and an
alternative equilibrium of forces will be found.
The amount of torsion in a member depends on its torsional stiffness in relation to the
torsional stiffness of the interconnecting members.
Fig. 8.1 Structural elements subjected to torsion (a) Beams
supporting cantilevered canopy slabs (b) Cantilever beam
supporting eccentric load (c) Box-girder bridges (d) Edge
beams in framed structures (e) Circular ring beams
Structures Subjected to Torsion
Fig. 8.2 Structures subjected to torsion (a) Curved continuous beams or box girders in
Bandra–Worli sea link bridge (b) Helicoidal girders
Torsion in Curved Beams
Curved beams (e.g., ring beams under circular water tanks supported by columns) are
subjected to bending and torsion. The magnitude and distribution of the bending and
torsional moments along the circumference are influenced by the number of supports
and the radius of the curved beam.
A typical curved beam circular in plan and supported by eight columns is shown in Fig.
8.3(a) (in the following slide). By considering Fig. 8.3(b), the maximum positive and
negative bending moments and the torsional moments can also be determined.
Torsion in Curved Beams
The critical sections for design are the support sections subjected to
maximum negative and positive bending moments and the sections
subjected to maximum torsion associated with some shear force; at this
section, the bending moment will be zero. Hence, it has to be designed
for combined torsion and shear.
Fig. 8.3 Beams curved in plan (a) Ring beam supported on eight columns (b) Position of
maximum moments
Torsional Analysis
Elastic Analysis
Fig. 8.4 Elastic torsional behaviour of rectangular beams (a) Beam subjected to torsion
(b) Warping of the cross section (c) Torsional stress (d) Crack pattern
Elastic Analysis
In the case of compatibility torsion, if the spandrel beam as shown in
Fig. 8.1(d) is uncracked, the torsional moment carried by it may be very
large. As the beam cracks, the torsional stiffness reduces considerably
and the beam will rotate, reducing the torsional moment carried by it.
As per Collins and Lampert (1973) the analysis can also be based on
zero torsional stiffness; such an analysis and the subsequent design
based on flexure and shear, neglecting torsion is satisfactory. However
torsional reinforcement increase ductility & distribute cracks.
Torsion in a Thin-walled Rectangular Tube
Fig. 8.5 Torsion in a thin-walled rectangular tube (a) Thin-walled tube (b) Area enclosed
by shear flow path
Torsional Analysis
Plastic Analysis
The value of stress to be used in the limit states design should be based on plastic
analysis, even though the assumption of fully plasticized section is not justifiable for
materials like concrete.
In plastic analysis, a uniform shear stress over the cross section is assumed, whereas
the elastic analysis shows a non-linear stress distribution, as shown in Fig. 8.4(c).
Plastic Analysis
The ultimate torque can now be easily obtained by using the sand
heap analogy, which is based on the
following principles:
1. Ultimate torque = Twice the volume of sand heap
2. Slope of sand heap = 2 × constant plastic shear stress
The principal tensile and compressive stress trajectories form in orthogonal directions
at 45° to the axis of the beam. When the principal tensile stress reaches the value of
tensile strength of concrete, cracks form at the maximum stressed location centre of the
beam (at the middle of wider face).
Behaviour of Plain Concrete Members
These inclined cracks tend to extend around the member in a spiral
fashion, as shown in Figs 8.7(b) and 8.4(d).
Once the crack is formed, the crack will penetrate inwards from the
outer surface of the beam, due to the brittle nature of the concrete and
will lead to a sudden failure of the beam unless torsional reinforcements
are provided.
Stresses Caused by Torsion
Fig. 8.7 Stresses caused by torsion (a) Shear and principal stresses (b) Crack pattern
Behaviour of Beams with Torsional
Reinforcement
The torsional reinforcements come into play only after the cracks form
due to diagonal tensile stresses. As the cracks spiral around the beam,
the best way to provide reinforcement is to have them in the form of
spirals to resist the tensile stresses.
The width of the slab that should be included is shown shaded in Fig.
8.10 and should not exceed the projection of beam above or below the
slab or four times the thickness of slab whichever is smaller.
Consideration of Flanged Beams
Fig. 8.11 Stirrups for torsion (a) Closed stirrup in rectangular beam (b) Closed stirrup in T-beam section
Transverse Torsional Reinforcement
Fig. 8.12 Area enclosed by centre line of the outermost closed transverse torsional
reinforcement for rectangular, I, L, and box section beams
Area of Longitudinal Reinforcement for
Torsion
The longitudinal reinforcement must be proportioned to resist the
longitudinal tensile forces that occur due to torsion. It is required to
distribute the longitudinal torsional steel around the perimeter of the
cross section.
This concept is extended in the case of torsion too and an upper limit
of 0.6 fck plus the stress causing shear cracking is specified; this limit is
intended to control the crack width due to shear and torsion.
Fig. 8.14 Addition of torsional and shear stresses (a) Hollow sections (b) Solid sections
Skew Bending Theory
The skew bending theory assumes that some shear and torsion is
resisted by the concrete and the rest by the shear or torsion
reinforcement. In this theory, the behaviour is studied on the basis of
the mechanism of failure, rather than on the basis of stresses.
Under the action of bending, the failure is vertical, with the primary
yielding of tension steel in under-reinforced beams and secondary
compression crushing of concrete.
Skew Bending Theory
The effect of adding even a little torque skews the failure surface. The
skewing is in the direction of the resultant moment–torque vector. The
compression face is at an angle θ to the vertical face of the beam cross
section.
This compression failure can occur at the top, sides, or bottom of the
beam as shown in Fig. 8.15. Such a failure surface intersects some of the
stirrups, which essentially provide torsional resistance.
The tension steel may yield first followed by the stirrups. If both yield
before the crushing of concrete, the beam is under-reinforced. If the
concrete crushes before both types of steel yield, it is over-reinforced.
Skew Bending Theory
Beams with large bending moment and small torsion fail with the
compression fibres crushing at the top; this type of failure is termed as
Mode 1 or modified bending failure (Fig. 8.15a). Mode 1 is the most
common type of failure and likely to occur in wide beams, even if the
torsion is relatively high.
If the beam is narrow (D >> b) and deep with equal amounts of top
and bottom steel, the failure may be by crushing at the sides. This
failure is termed as Mode 2 or lateral bending failure (Fig. 8.15b).
If the top longitudinal steel is much less than the bottom steel, the
failure may occur by crushing at the bottom fibre. This type of failure is
termed as Mode 3 or negative bending failure (Fig. 8.15c).
Skew Bending Theory
Large torsion and low flexure may result in Mode 2 and Mode 3
failures. Large moment may force the Mode 1 failure. High shear and
low torsion sometimes result in Mode 4 failure. It is necessary to
investigate these several modes systematically and choose the lowest
capacity for a given beam.
Fig. 8.15 Failure modes as per skew bending theory (a) Mode 1 (bending
and torsion) (b) Mode 2 (low shear–high torsion) (c) Mode 3 (low bending–
high torsion; weaker top steel) (d) Mode 4 (high shear–low torsion)
Interaction Curves for Combined Flexure
and Torsion
Torsion is normally accompanied by bending and shear. In general,
flexural and torsional shears are of significance in those regions where
the bending moment is low.
Fig. 8.17 Torsion–Shear interaction (a) Experimental results (b) Curves in the literature
Indian Code Provisions for Design of
Longitudinal and Transverse Reinforcements
The Indian code provisions are based on the simplified skew bending
theory.
In this approach, the longitudinal and torsional reinforcements are not
calculated separately. Instead, the total longitudinal reinforcement is
calculated based on a fictitious, equivalent bending moment, which is a
function of the actual bending moment and torsion.
In T-beams, the flanges are neglected and the beam is designed by
considering the rectangular web alone.
Clause 41.2 of the code also states that the sections located at a
distance less than the effective depth, d, from the face of the support
may be designed for the same torsion as computed at a distance d from
the support.
Equivalent Shear and Moment
For the case of pure torsion equal longitudinal reinforcement is
required at the top and bottom of the rectangular beam.
The equivalent B.M. and equivalent Shear are given by IS
456:2000 as (Clause 41.4.2):
Minimum Reinforcement for Torsion
Fig. 8.19 Ineffective closed stirrups for members under high torsion
Design and Detailing for Torsion as
per IS 456 Code
The following design steps are required for the design of flexural and
shear reinforcement as per IS 456:
The two balanced yield curves divide the graph into four regions. The
relative position of a point of coordinates (reinforcing indices) with
respect to these curves or regions indicates the expected mode of
failure of an element with these reinforcement ratios.
Graphical Methods
2. High-strength concrete
3. Lightweight concrete
4. Size effect