Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Robert Pitt
University of Alabama
1
From: Water Resources Engineering, 1st Edition. Larry W. Mays, John Wiley From: Water Resources Engineering, 1st Edition. Larry W. Mays, John Wiley
& Sons, Inc. 2001. (Table 11.1.4 page 346) & Sons, Inc. 2001. (Table 11.1.4 page 346)
Units Average Use Peak Use Units Average Use Peak Use
Hotels L/day/m2 10.4 17.6 Laundromats L/day/m2 88.4 265
Motels L/day/m2 9.1 63.1 Retail space L/day/sales m2 4.3 11
Barber shops L/day/barber 207 1470 Elementary L/day/student 20.4 186
chair schools
Beauty shops L/day/station 1020 4050 High schools L/day/student 25.1 458
Restaurants L/day/seat 91.6 632 Bus-rail depot L/day/m2 136 1020
Night clubs L/day/person 5 5 Car washes L/day/inside m2 194.7 1280
served
Churches L/day/member 0.5 17.8
Hospitals L/day/bed 1310 3450
Golf-swim clubs L/day/member 117 84
Nursing homes L/day/bed 503 1600
Bowling alleys L/day/alley 503 503
Medical offices L/day/m2 25.2 202
Residential L/day/student 401 946
Laundry L/day/m2 10.3 63.9 colleges
From: Water Resources Engineering, 1st Edition. Larry W. Mays, John Wiley From: Water Resources Engineering, 1st Edition. Larry W. Mays, John Wiley & Sons,
& Sons, Inc. 2001. (Table 11.1.4 page 346) Inc. 2001. (Table 11.1.5 Page 347)
Units Average Use Peak Use Washing machine L/load 130 – 270
2
From: Water Resources Engineering, 1st Edition. Larry W. Mays, John Wiley & Sons, From: Water Resources Engineering, 1st Edition. Larry W. Mays, John Wiley & Sons,
Inc. 2001. (Table 11.1.5 Page 347) Inc. 2001. (Table 11.1.5 Page 347)
Low-flow shower head L/minute 6 – 11 Washing car with running water L/20 minutes 400 – 800
Filling bathtub L 100 – 300 Washing car with pistol-grip L/20 minutes 60
faucet
Watering 750-m2 lawn L/month 7600 – 16000
Uncovered pool L lost/month 3000 – 11000+
Standard sprinkler L/hour 110 – 910
Covered pool L lost/month 300 – 1200
One drip-irrigation emitter L/hour 1 – 10
½-Inch diameter hose L/hour 1100
5/8-Inch diameter hose L/hour 1900
¾-Inch diameter hose L/hour 2300
3
Typical daily cycles in water demand Peak Water Use Estimation: Estimation of
Average Daily Rate Based on a Maximum Time Period
Goodrich Formula:
• Estimates maximum demand (expressed as daily water demand based
on time period for which maximum water demand is desired) for
community when given annual average per capita daily water use rate:
p 180 t 0.10
where p = percentage of average annual rate (volume/day) used in period of
time of interest
t = length of period for which peak demand is required (days) (valid
time periods – 2 hours to 360 days)
• Consumption rate for max day = 180% of the annual average Typical demand factors
daily consumption
4
Fire Demand
In metric units (AWWA 1992):
NFFi Ci Oi X P i
Construction coefficient, F
C is the construction factor based on the size of the building and
its construction,
C i 220 F Ai
C (L/min),
A (m2) is the effective floor area, typically equal to the area of the
largest floor plus 50% of all other floors,
Occupancy factors, Oi
5
Required fire flow durations
Example 3.16 from Chin 2000 Design periods and capacities in water-supply systems
NFFi C iOi X P i
Ci 220F Ai
The construction factor is calculated as (F=0.8 for class 3
noncombustible construction and the floor area is 8,000 m2):
6
Methods of Water Distribution Water Distribution System Components
7
The Pipe System, Cont. The Pipe System, Cont.
8
Pressure in Municipal Distribution Systems Pressure in Municipal Distribution Systems
(American Water Works Association) (McGee)
AWWA recommends normal static pressure of 400-500kPa, 60- • Pressure in the range of 150 – 400kPa (20 to
75lb/in2
- supplies ordinary uses in building up to 10 stories 40 lb/in2) are adequate for normal use and may
- will supply sprinkler system in buildings be used for fire supply in small towns where
up to 5 stories building heights do not exceed 4 stories.
- will provide useful fire flow without pumper trucks
- will provide a relatively large margin of
safety to offset sudden high demand or
closure of part of the system.
9
Hardy Cross Method For Hardy-Cross Analysis:
• Used in design and analysis of water • Water is actually removed from the distribution system of a
city at a very large number of points.
distribution systems for many years.. • Its is not reasonable to attempt to analyze a system with this
degree of detail
• Based on the hydraulic formulas we reviewed • Rather, individual flows are concentrated at a smaller number
earlier in the term. of points, commonly at the intersection of streets.
• The distribution system can then be considered to consist of a
network of nodes (corresponding to points of concentrated
flow withdrawal) and links (pipes connecting the nodes).
• The estimated water consumption of the areas contained
within the links is distributed to the appropriate nodes
(Walski, et al. 2004 figure 3.4) (Walski, et al. 2004 figure 3.32)
10
Minimal skeletonization Moderate skeletonization
(Walski, et al. 2004 figure 3.33) (Walski, et al. 2004 figure 3.34)
(Walski, et al. 2004 figure 3.35) (Walski, et al. 2001 figure 7.17)
11
Profile of pressure zones
Important tank
elevations
(Walski, et al. 2001 figure 7.20) (Walski, et al. 2001 figure 3.10)
Hardy-Cross Method of Water Distribution Steps for Setting Up and Solving a Water Distribution
Design System using the Hardy-Cross Method
12
Steps for the Hardy-Cross Method Steps for the Hardy-Cross Method
2. Calculate water use on each street (including fire demand
on the street where it should be located). 3. Add up the flow used in the neighborhood without fire
Street Building Without Fire Demand With Fire Demand (worst demand and distribute it out the nodes where known
Number Description building)
outflow is required. Repeat for fire demand.
MGD ft3/sec MGD ft3/sec
1** 5 A, 1 S 0.059 0.092 2.00 3.10
2 3A 0.019 0.030 0.019 0.030
3 18 A 0.12 0.18 0.12 0.18 Total without Fire Demand = 0.75 cfs
4 3 A, 1 O, 1 C 0.056 0.086 0.056 0.086
Influent = 2.5 MGD = 3.87 cfs
5 2A 0.013 0.020 0.013 0.020
6 7A 0.045 0.070 0.045 0.070 Left Over to Other Neighborhoods = 3.12 cfs
7 10 A 0.065 0.100 0.065 0.100 Distribute 50/50 to two outflow nodes = 1.56 cfs
8 2A 0.013 0.020 0.013 0.020 (arbitrary for this problem – would be based on known
9 7A 0.045 0.070 0.045 0.070 “downstream” requirements).
10 8A 0.052 0.080 0.052 0.080
11 No buildings 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Steps for the Hardy-Cross Method Steps for the Hardy-Cross Method
Inflow = Outflows
13
Steps for the Hardy-Cross Method Steps for the Hardy-Cross Method
6. For each of the pipes 7. For the above node and the next pipes in the distribution
leaving the inflow system, subtract the water used on the street (and
aggregated at the node) from the water flowing down the
node, put the water
pipe. Pass the remaining water along to one or more of
demand for that the pipes connected to that node.
street at the node at
the end of the pipe.
8. Repeat Steps 6 and 7 for each pipe and node in the
distribution system. The calculation can be checked by
seeing if the total water outflow from the system equals
the total inflow to the system, as well as checking each
node to see if inflow equals outflow.
Steps for the Hardy-Cross Method Steps for the Hardy-Cross Method
9a. Check each node to see if inflow equals outflow. 9b. Check each node to see if inflow equals outflow.
14
Steps for the Hardy-Cross Method
10. Select initial pipe sizes (assume a velocity of 3 ft/sec for normal flow with no fire
Steps for the Hardy-Cross Method
demand). With a known/assumed flow and an assumed velocity, use the continuity
equation (Q = VA) to calculate the cross-sectional area of flow. (when conducting 11. Determine the convention for flow. Generally, clockwise
computer design, set diameters to minimum allowable diameters for each type of flows are positive and counter-clockwise flows are negative.
neighborhood according to local regulations)
Pipe Flow (ft3/sec) Velocity Area (ft2) Diameter Diameter Actual D
Number (ft/sec) (ft) (in) (in)
1 1.94 3.0 0.65 0.91 10.9 12
2 0.288 3.0 0.10 0.35 4.2 6
3 0.922 3.0 0.31 0.63 7.5 8
4 1.930 3.0 0.64 0.91 10.9 12
5 1.000 3.0 0.33 0.65 7.8 8
6 0.922 3.0 0.31 0.63 7.5 8
7 0.220 3.0 0.07 0.31 3.7 4
8 1.100 3.0 0.37 0.68 8.2 10
9 0.852 3.0 0.28 0.60 7.2 8
10 0.562 3.0 0.19 0.49 5.9 6
11 0.562 3.0 0.19 0.49 5.9 6
Q 1.85
hL L 14. Compute the quantity, head loss/flow (hL/Q), for
0.432CD 2.63 each element/pipe (note that the signs cancel out,
leaving a positive number).
Darcy Weisbach
15
Steps for the Hardy-Cross Method Steps for the Hardy-Cross Method
16. Compute the correction for each loop. 17. Apply the correction for each pipe in the loop that is
not shared with another loop.
hL Q1 = Q0 + Q
loop
Q
hL
n
loop Q 18. For those pipes that are shared, apply the following
correction equation (continuing to carry all the
appropriate signs on the flow):
where n = 1.85
Q1 = Q0 + Qloop in – Qshared loop
Steps for the Hardy-Cross Method Example for the Hardy-Cross Method
19. Reiterate until corrections are sufficiently small (10 – 15% or (From McGhee, Water Supply and Sewerage, Sixth Edition)
less of smallest flow in system), or until oscillation occurs.
22. Apply fire flow and other conditions that may be critical and
reevaluate.
16
Example for the Hardy-Cross Method
Convert units to U.S. Customary units:
Example for the Hardy-Cross Method
BC 4921 18 6.23
CD 3281 16 -5.54
DA 3609 12 -2.6
AB 2625 10 3.29
Steps for the Hardy-Cross Method Example for the Hardy-Cross Method
17
Example for the Hardy-Cross Method Example for the Hardy-Cross Method
• Calculate hL/Q for each pipe (all of these ratios have
positive signs, as the negative values for hL and Q • Calculate head loss using Hazen-Williams and column totals:
cancel out).
Pipe Section hL (ft) hL/Q (sec/ft2)
Pipe Section Flow0 (ft3/sec) hL (ft) hL/Q (sec/ft2)
BC 19.03 3.05
BC 6.23 19.03 3.05
CD -18.11 3.27
CD -5.54 -18.11 3.27
DA -19.93 7.66
DA -2.6 -19.93 7.66 AB 54.39 16.53
AB 3.29 54.39 16.53 hL = 35.38 (hL/Q) = 30.51
Example for the Hardy-Cross Method Example for the Hardy-Cross Method
• Calculate the correction factor for each pipe in the loop. • Calculate the new flows for each pipe using the following
hL equation:
Q loop
Q1= Q +0 Q
n hL where n = 1.85
loop Q
Pipe Section Flow0 (ft3/sec) Q (ft3/sec) Flow1 (ft3/sec)
18
Example for the Hardy-Cross Method Final Flows for the Hardy-Cross Example
HARDY CROSS METHOD FOR WATER SUPPLY DISTRIBUTION
Trial I
Pipe Length Pipe Diameter Flow 0 HL/Q n(HL/Q) Flow 1
Pipe Section HL (f t) (HL) (f t) Q (f t3/sec)
(f t) (in) (ft3 /sec) (sec/ft 2 ) (sec/ft 2 ) (ft3 /sec)
BC 4921 18 6.2 19.03 3.05 -0.627 5.60
CD 3281 16 -5.5 -18.11 3.27 -0.627 -6.17
56.46 35.38
DA 3609 12 -2.6 -19.93 7.66 -0.627 -3.23
BA 2625 10 3.3 54.39 16.53 -0.627 2.66
Trial 2
Pipe Length Pipe Diameter Flow 1 HL/Q n(HL/Q) Flow 2
Pipe Section HL (f t) (HL) (f t) Q (f t3/sec)
(f t) (in) (ft3 /sec) (sec/ft 2 ) (sec/ft 2 ) (ft3 /sec)
BC 4921 18 5.60 15.64 2.79 -0.012 5.59
CD 3281 16 -6.17 -22.08 3.58 -0.012 -6.18
54.38 0.64
DA 3609 12 -3.23 -29.71 9.21 -0.012 -3.24
BA 2625 10 2.66 36.79 13.81 -0.012 2.65
Trial 3
Pipe Length Pipe Diameter Flow 2 HL/Q n(HL/Q) Flow 3
Pipe Section HL (f t) (HL) (f t) Q (f t3/sec)
(f t) (in) (ft3 /sec) (sec/ft 2 ) (sec/ft 2 ) (ft3 /sec)
BC 4921 18 5.59 15.58 2.79 0.000 5.59
CD 3281 16 -6.18 -22.16 3.59 0.000 -6.18
54.34 0.00
DA 3609 12 -3.24 -29.91 9.24 0.000 -3.24
BA 2625 10 2.65 36.49 13.76 0.000 2.65
In the first case: 100 ft. – 15.58 ft. – 36.49 ft. = 47.93 ft.
And in the second: 100 ft. – 22.16 ft. – 29.91 ft. = 47.93 ft.
(Walski, et al. 2001 figure 7.3)
19
Pressure comparison for 6-, 8-, 12-, and 16- inch pipes Head loss comparison for 6-, 8-, 12-, and 16- inch pipes
(Walski, et al. 2001 figure 7.4) (Walski, et al. 2001 figure 7.5)
20