Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Leak Types
Gross > 1 atms cc / sec
Medium > 0.01 atms cc / sec or 1x10-2
BUBBLE TESTING
DYE PENETRATION
HELIUM MASS SPECTROMETER
PRESSURE TESTING
ADVANTAGES
Short test time
Fairly easy to perform in small test systems.
DISADVANTAGES
METHOD
ADVANTAGES
DISADVANTAGES
METHOD
This technique involves the use of air as the tracer gas. One of the many
techniques available under this method involves pressurizing one side of
the system to be tested with air (tracer gas) and submerging in water. A
stream of bubbles will form at the point of leak.
BUBBLE TESTING 1x10-5 cc/sec
ADVANTAGES
Bubbles locate leak position
Little skill and cost involved.
Procedure is safe in combustible atmospheres.
Appropriate equipment readily available.
DISADVANTAGES
Bubbles can come from sources other than leaks and give false signals.
Low reliability as water surface tension or impurities may plug the leaks.
Operator and time dependent.
Tested product can't be returned to the line without cleaning.
DYE PENETRATION 1x10-6 cc/sec
METHOD
This test involves applying a penetrating dye to one side of the surface.
After a minimum of 15 minutes the other side is visually examined for the
presence of dye by using either a developer solution or ultraviolet light.
ADVANTAGES
Materials are relatively low cost.
The dye produces a visual indication of the leak.
DISADVANTAGES
Method is more sensitive than bubble, pressure and light testing, but the
results can be affected by the geometry of the leakage path.
Test is destructive.
Procedure is very slow
The dye can plug micro leaks.
Principle of Helium leak testing
ADVANTAGES DISADVANTAGES
Fast and efficient detection of faulty Production-line units involve high initial cost.
product This is offset by:
Not dependant on operator judgment Returning the tested product to the
Helium is readily available production line
Mass spectrometer system has No operator involvement in the testing
sensitivity up to 1 x 10-12 cc/sec
Reduction in costly returns
Auto-calibration with reference leaks
traceable to international standards
Equipment requires regular maintenance
Method is reliable and consistent by qualified person.
Non destructive
Leak Detection with
Thermography
&
Ultrasonic Acoustics
Background
Detecting leaking fluids, whether it be steam, water or
different types of gases, is of major concern at AEP
power plants.
These leaking fluids can affect safety, operation,
maintenance, heat rate, and work performance.
Detecting leaks can be difficult in a power plant
environment.
AEP has discovered that the combined application of
Infrared Thermography and Ultrasonic Acoustics as
part of a plant Predictive Maintenance Program can
efficiently identify leaks in many areas.
Infrared Thermography
Infrared Thermography (IR) can be used to detect
leaks on the following equipment/systems :
1. Leaking Process Valves
2. Steam Traps
3. Condensers
4. Heaters
5. Safety Valves
6. Boiler Casing
Valve leakage
396.0°F
This leaking valve is over 177oC (350oF).
Most leaking valves are less evident.
AR01: >364.3°F
66.5°F
400
300
valve, valve chest, etc.,
200
drain lines need to be
checked for leak
SP01: 393.3°F
100
93.7°F
400
totally closed before
300
inspecting.
200
176.6°F
300
SP01
200
monitor).
118.6°F
100
90
80.2°F
115
• Check all bolts,
AR01: 100.8°F
140
160
12oC (20oF) difference
SP01: 153.4°F
140 across the flange.
120
SP02: 173.9°F
100
67oC 79oC 80
75.8°F
Condenser Air In-leakage
• Using IR for air in-leakage requires a small
temperature span since the leakage cools the
downstream piping only by a few degrees.
• Changes in surface conditions (paint, rust,
etc.) must be accounted for or false
positives can result.
• Using ultrasonics or other methods to
confirm any leak is highly recommended.
Heaters
180
160
SP01: *156.6°F
140
pumps, and other types
120
should be checked.
100
93.1°F
SP01
• Test Point A = 50 db
• Test Point B = 40 db
• Test Point C = 17 db
• Test Point D = 8 db
Ultrasonic Acoustics
• Ultrasonic valve and steam trap inspection is considered
a "positive" test in that an operator can instantly identify
sound quality and intensity differentials and thereby
determine operating condition accurately. A steam trap
troubleshooting guide is usually available from the
factory upon request.
• Ultrasonic Acoustic is best when used with Infrared
Thermography to find leakage.
• Newer equipment can record Ultrasonic Acoustic wave
patterns and sound levels.
Steam leak Steam Trap
Air leak
Summary
Infrared Thermography and Ultrasonic Acoustics
both provide accurate detection of fluid leaks
that commonly occur at a power plant.
When combined, the effectiveness of these leak
detection methods increases dramatically.
Confirming a suspected leak detected with one
technology by repeating the detection with a
separate technology is always a best practice.
Proper reporting of findings is key to the
successful application of these technologies.