You are on page 1of 22

Precision Time Protocol

IEEE1588v2

TICTOC BOF IETF Prague 2007

Ron Cohen
Resolute Networks
ronc@resolutenetworks.com
Agenda
• Status
• PTPv1 overview
• PTPv2 major additions
• Transparent clocks
• PTP and TICTOC

2
The Precision Time Protocol (PTP)
• PTPv1 published in 2002
• Industries involved:
 v1: Industrial Automation, T&M, Military, Power Generation and
Distribution
 v2 : Audio-Visio Bridges (802.1AS), Telecom and Mobile
• Symposia in 2003, 2004, 2005, and 2006. 2007 in Vienna
• Products: Microprocessors, GPS Linked Clocks, Boundary Clocks,
NIC Cards, Protocol Stacks, RF Instrumentation, Aircraft Flight
Monitoring Instruments, etc.
• Information: http://ieee1588.nist.gov
• Version 2 PAR approved March 2005. Technical work
completed

3
PTPv1 objectives
• Sub-microsecond synchronization
• Intended for relatively localized systems
• Applicable to networks supporting multicast
• Simple, administration free installation
• Support heterogeneous systems of clocks with
varying precision, resolution and stability
• Minimal resource requirements on networks and
host components

4
Protocol overview
• Timing Protocol
 Align slaves to master time
 Measure delay between master and slave
 Measure per-link delay (v2)

• Synchronization Hierarchy ‘routing’ Protocol


 Automatic Best Master Clock Algorithm
 Determines the master-slave synchronization clock tree
hierarchy
• Management Protocol
 Configuration and performance monitoring

5
PTP Master-Slave Hierarchy

*Clock symbols taken from ITU-T


SG15 ‘synchronization modeling
components – time’ contribution
#249 Geneva-2007 by Mike Gilson
of BT

6
Timing Protocol Operation

7
Precision using HW time-stamping

8
1-step and 2-step clocks
• 1-step clock updates accurate timestamp (t1) in
Sync message
• 2-step clock sends accurate timestamp (t1) in a
Follow_Up message
 Simplify design while avoiding queuing noise
 Ease integration of security extensions

9
PTPv2 major additions
• Synchronization accuracies better than 1 nanosecond
• Higher sampling/message rates
• Unicast communication
• Correction for asymmetry
• Transparent clocks
• Redundancy
• Configurable synchronization hierarchy
• Decouple sync messaging from hierarchy signaling
• Formal mechanisms for message extensions
• Mappings to UDP/IPv4&6, Ethernet w/o VLAN, (also
DeviceNet™, PROFINET, ControlNet™)
10
Sync and Delay-Req formats

11
End-to-End Transparent Clocks

E2E TCs cancel queuing and processing delays

12
Peer-to-Peer Transparent Clocks

P2P TCs cancel queuing, processing and propagation delays

13
Peer Delay Measurement (Optional)

14
E2E TC Enabled PSN

Packet queuing and processing is removed

15
P2P TC Enabled PSN

Topology change does not effect slave performance

16
Comparison between switches
Boundary Clock E2E TC P2P TC
Clock Synchronized Syntonized Syntonized

Topology √ None √ None Homogenous*


limitations with 1:1 connection
each link
State • Per port state • Temporal • Per link state
maintained • Per unicast message state for • Temporal
contract state 2-step TCs message state
for 2-step TCs
Slave √ Hierarchical Master sees all √ Hierarchical
scalability slaves (multicast Sync)
Linear Control wander √ √
scalability accumulation
Topology Measure new delay Measure new delay √ Pre-compute link
change delays
*restriction can be relieved using P-delay over MPLS

17
PTP protocol extensions
• Define a profile that selects optional feature set,
default and range of values
• Define TLV extension to messages
• Define flag-fields to be carried in event messages
• Define alternate management scheme (SNMP)
• Define alternate synchronization hierarchy
selection (routing) algorithm
• Define additional transport mapping (PTP over
MPLS)
• Define alternate clock quality levels and attributes

18
PTP and TICTOC
Requirements Description
Services Frequency, Phase, Time and meta-Time services
Precision Nano-seconds accuracy demonstrated
Sub nano-seconds granularity

Incremental Add Transparent clocks or Boundary clocks to improve


performance if required in critical junctions
Performance Telecom grade performance has been demonstrated over
non-PTP-aware networks

Scalable Use of boundary clocks and/or transparent clocks to scale


and maintain performance limits

Robust to master Smart slaves synchronizing to two domains or two masters in


failures a single domain.
Alternate master takes over when master fails
Robust to P2P mechanism allows to pre-compute link-delays to
topology changes minimize effect of topology change

19
PTP and TICTOC
Derived Description
Requirements

HW friendly Correction field is scaled nano-seconds. All computations by


transparent clocks are performed on correction field

Correction field is in a fixed position from beginning of PTP


header
Single Timestamp in fixed position immediately after PTP
header for master and slave HW setting

Heterogonous 2-step clocks simplify master designs


design options 1-step transparent clocks do not need to maintain per
master-slave message states

Slave friendly Timescale (Timestamps) is continuous. Timestamps do not


‘jump’ or ‘miss’ one second when leap event occurs

Time-stamps do not roll over

20
Questions?

Ron Cohen
Resolute Networks
ronc@resoluteNetworks.com
NTP message format

22

You might also like