mobilization of small savings from clients who do not have access to formal financial markets. The term was coined to describe the replication of the Grameen Bank credit program in the developing world. It combines savings mobilization as a part of a credit delivery system that supply of small amount of loans (micro-credit) to low-income households for generation of self-employment. A socioeconomic study of credit operation in a village near Chittagong University ( Zobra) by Professor M. Yunus laid the foundation of micro-credit model in 1976 The study observed that many low-income households operate tiny economic activities by taking loans from moneylenders with very high rate of interest, often 10 percent per month. After paying the interest and the principal, the borrower has very little surplus left to accumulate savings to expand business. The operators are thus perpetually dependent on moneylenders for high-interest loans that sustains the vicious circle of poverty. If credit could be extended to these households on easy terms, they could save small amounts at the end of each loan cycle, increase equity in the business, and move on a ladder for poverty reduction. But banks do not consider them credit-worthy since the size of loan they demand is tiny, and they cannot offer any collateral that could be invoked in case of default. Dr. Yunus went to a nearby branch of a Krishi Bank and pleaded to give them loans under his own personal guarantee. Since the borrowers are engaged in activities that generate regular incomes (cottage industries, petty trade etc), he developed a weekly loan repayment system that suits the circumstances of low-income households. The loans were all repaid in time to the surprise of the bank officials. But, they thought that the borrowers behaved well because of the personal influence of the professor. The senior management of the Krishi Bank gave him a challenge to replicate the experience in an area outside Chittangong. A low-cost loan fund (obtained from a grant from IFAD) was offered to Professor Yunus to operate his credit program in Tangail district where he is unknown to local people. With repeated experiments a loan delivery and repayment system was developed appropriate to the needs of poor people. The success of Chittagong was repeated in Tangail. In 1984, the Ministry of Finance was convinced of the micro-credit model, and the Grammen Bank was formally launched Formation of a five member group with like- minded people to act as peer pressure to ensure proper utilization of the loan and repayment in time. A number of groups in the village was federated to form a Village Organization called Centre which meet once a week on fixed date and time. The Centre is used as a platform to conduct bank business, and bring credit services to the doorsteps of the people The credit was offered to households through women members, as they are found more responsible with money. Giving control over money could help empowering women The weekly meetings was a venue to use credit as an entry point for all round social development. Sixteen decisions to prevent social ills and good healthcare, hygiene and nutrition become the code of conduct for members of the credit program. The weekly meeting used to begin with chanting the sixteen decisions Members themselves propose economic activities to be financed with the loan. The proposals are scrutinized by the members in the weekly meeting which are attended by a bank worker. The loans are disbursed in the meeting, weekly repayments are collected, and social issues affecting the lives of the members are discussed Loans are offered for a year with a schedule of repayment with 50 equal weekly installments, and the repayment of interest in the remaining two weeks. Two members of the Group are offered loans in small amounts. Other members receive loans when the first two members maintain the repayment schedule. The Group becomes ineligible for a new loan if one member defaults. Five percent of the loan amount is deducted at the time disbursement of each loan. The amount is deposited in a savings fund along with the personal weekly savings. The Group Fund thus accumulated was maintained with the Grameen Bank as savings for the Group. The accumulated savings could only be withdrawn when the member leaves the Group. An Emergency Fund was also instituted as an insurance against loss of capital due to unforeseen circumstances. The Grameen Bank model was accepted by many NGOs in Bangladesh engaged in empowering the poor through community development. Some NGOs were established with sole purpose of providing credit to the poor and making micro-credit as a self- sustaining business, a model developed by ASA. The Palli Karma Sahayak Foundation (PKSF) was established by the government (with support from the World Bank) to encourage local NGOs support generation of self- employment with micro-credit. Professor Yunus set up Grameen Trust to replicate the Grameen Bank model internationally. The World Bank set up a consortium Consultative Group for Alleviation of Poverty (CGAP) to support this effort internationally. Since mobilization of savings was a part of the objectives of micro-credit organizations, micro-credit was renamed as microfinance by academic institutions. Unemployment and under-employment of the labor force are root causes of poverty At low levels of income the size of the formal sectors – manufacturing and services – is small. Even a double digit growth rate cannot absorb all additions to the labor force. Those who cannot find employment in the formal sectors are absorbed in agriculture and informal sectors, creating massive under-employment and disguised employment Credit is a capital support. The unemployed worker can combine capital with her/ his labor to produce goods and services which can be sold in the market. Access to credit can lead to gradual reduction in poverty if the rate of return on capital in the self-employed enterprise is higher than the rate of interest charged on the loan The speed of the process to poverty reduction depends on a) the demand for goods and services produced with the loan, b) the size of the loan, and c) the propensity to save the additional income. The payment of weekly installments made it easy for the borrower household to save the income from the loan. At the end of the loan cycle, the loan becomes equity. With a repeat loan the size of the capital grows. The larger the difference between the rate of return on capital and the rate of interest charged on the loan, the faster the income grows, and the household moves on the path of virtuous circle of poverty reduction Microfinance is suitable for activities that generates regular incomes, because installments have to be paid on a weekly basis. Activities include rickshaw and van driving, small scale petty trading, peddling, shop-keeping, poultry and dairy cow raising, cottage industries such as rice husking and handlooms operations, etc. Activities that generates income on a seasonal and annual basis such as crop farming or beef fattening were not suitable for organization with micro-credit, unless the household had a side business that generates regular income from which the installment can be paid. Many households became engaged in multiple enterprises to suit micro-finance delivery system. If the credit is properly utilized in an activity that gives high return on investment, recovery of loans is not a problem. Low opportunity cost of labor encouraged borrowers to accept self-exploitation of labor as long as total income from the enterprise is higher than the alternative wage earnings in the market. Human capital intensive delivery system and the small size of loan make microfinance a high-cost operation. The rate of interest charged on the loan must be high in order to make the micro-finance organization self-sustaining. Coercion is used by bank workers to get repayment from unsuccessful borrowers which led them further into poverty. Microfinance is no longer an entry point for social development. With the ASA model to make Microfinance an income earning business. The experience was a gradual de-emphasize on social development activities that accompanied microfinance movement in the early years. Microfinance has become a business with many financial institutions interested in lending money to microfinance organization Microfinance business has expanded vastly reaching market saturation. Over the last few years microfinance business has been expanding at a rate of over 20 percent per year Grameen Bank, ASA and BRAC alone extends credit to nearly 18 million households. PKSF funds nearly 250 local NGOs that may cover anther six t million households. Bangladesh has only 30 million households, 25 million in rural areas where most of the microfinance business is conducted. Studies from household side however shows that not more than 50 percent households have been reached with credit services. Overlapping has become a big problem. One household or different members of the same household are served by a number of microfinance organizations with adverse impact on credit discipline and loan recovery. Over supply of credit and too much competition among microfinance borrowers have led reduction in the rate of return on credit, leading to difficulty in maintaining repayment schedule. Frequent natural disasters leading to loss of capital and disruption of economic activity exacerbate the problem of maintaining repayment schedule. Coercion on getting the repayment in time has created a negative image for microfinance among the civil society in Bangladesh. Older microfinance organization have established better competitive edge in the market due to accumulation of savings which is now used as a low cost loan fund. For Grameen Bank the accumulation in savings fund now exceeds the outstanding loan with the borrowers Many older microfinance organizations with high accumulated savings now allow savings to be used to pay regular repayment of installments to show excellent recovery on paper. We must recognize that traditional microfinance products (annual loans with weekly repayments) has reached market saturation. Further expansion will lead borrowers to poverty deepening than to poverty reduction. The microfinance organizations must seek vertical expansion with larger loan size with different loan products, and different delivery and recovery mechanism It is not necessary to cover all landless households with micro- credit. The expansion of micro-credit for generation of self- employment in non-farm activities has led to tightness in the rural labor market and rapid increase in rural wages. The micro-credit movement thus has indirectly helped increase income for labor selling households not reached by micro-credit There is unmet demand for credit for many other economic activities in rural areas. These include crop farming, beef fattening, acquisition of agricultural machinery, financing land leasing, and financing cost of international migration etc. Traditional micro-credit model of delivery and recovery of loan within a year is not suitable for servicing these loan demands. Thinking “out of box” is necessary to extend supply of credit to these directions.