EVALUATION & REWARD SCHEME FOR SUGGESTIONS

ESCORTS

• All implemented suggestions will be evaluated for award points by score rating system. Evaluation score will
be given against following criteria in respect of the suggestion :
– Benefits (Tangible or Intangible)
– Applicability
– Individual/Group Sugg.
– Efforts by Suggestor In Implementation of Idea
• This scheme is applicable for all suggestions being evaluated henceforth, effective 1 March, 2009
under the Samriddhi program.

EVALUATION SCORE RATING CHART :

TANGIBLE BENEFITS SUGGESTIONS INTANGIBLE BENEFITS SUGGESTIONS

ASSIGNMENT OF SCOPE SCORE ASSIGNMENT OF SCOPE SCORE ALLOCATED

ALLOCATED

TANGIBLE BENEFITS (COST SAVING) INTANGIBLE BENEFITS

80 30
APPLICABILITY/IMPLIMENTATION APPLICABILITY
5 5
INDIVIDUAL/GROUP SUGG. INDIVIDUAL/GROUP SUGG.
5 5
EFFORTS EFFORTS
10 10

TOTAL 100 TOTAL 50

1 March, 2009
 EVALUATION CHART- TANGIBLE/ INTANGIBLE SUGG.
ESCORTS
For TANGIBLE UP TO RS. 1 Lac.- RS.1 to 2 Lac./- RS. 2 to 5 Lac./- RS.5 to 50 Lac. Rs.50 Lac. & Above
BENEFIT RECURRING (1-15 SCORE) (16-25SCORE) (26-40SCORE) (41-60SCORE) (60-80score)
Suggestions BENEFIT
Only

UP TO 3 Lac./- RS. 3 to 4.5 RS.4.5 to 10 RS.10 to 60 Lac. Rs.60 Lac. & Above
ONE TIME BENEFIT (1-15 SCORE) Lac. Lac. (41-60SCORE) (60-80 SCORE
(16-25 SCORE) (26-40SCORE)

For Quality Related/ House-keeping Process Improvement - likely Process improvement-

INTANGIBLE •Part/Product Benefits working to improve product quality
BENEFIT Has lead to in-line rejections. (Over one
quality environment/conditi resulting in customer delight
Suggestions month)
•Working condition on (7-15 Score)
Only (10-15 Score)
•Systems quality
(1-6 Score)

Productivity Regular work interruption removed resulted in Output increased resulting in capacity utilization
Related smooth workflow and achieved defined/ agreed and improvement in productivity.
productivity level. (7-15score)
(1-6 Score)
For All Applicability - On own machine/ On many machines/ other work Many machine/ other/work areas in
(TANGIBLE & Implementation work place areas in PU/Deptt. plant/across AMG
INTANGIBLE on (1 score) (2-3 score) (4-5 score)
Suggestions)
Individual/ Group Individual Sugg. Group suggestion
Suggestion ( Nil) (5 score)

Total effort for No efforts Some Considerable efforts 100% implementation by individual/ team.
implementation efforts made and no. of No external help taken.
of idea (1-3 difficulties (7-10score)
1 March, 2009 (nil) score) overcome.
(4-6 score)
 REWARD POINTS FOR TANGIBLE
SUGGESTIONS ESCORTS

TANGIBLE SUGGESTION : SCORE VS REWARD POINTS

REWARD REWARD REWARD REWARD
SCORE SCORE SCORE SCORE
POINTS POINTS POINTS POINTS
1 50 26 1760 51 5925 76 11100
2 75 27 1920 52 6100 77 11325
3 100 28 2080 53 6275 78 11550
4 125 29 2240 54 6450 79 11775
5 150 30 2400 55 6625 80 12000
6 175 31 2560 56 6800 81 12400
7 200 32 2720 57 6975 82 12800
8 225 33 2880 58 7150 83 13200
9 250 34 3040 59 7325 84 13600
10 300 35 3200 60 7500 85 14000
11 350 36 3360 61 7725 86 14400
12 400 37 3520 62 7950 87 14800
13 450 38 3680 63 8175 88 15200
14 500 39 3840 64 8400 89 15600
15 550 40 4000 65 8625 90 16000
16 600 41 4175 66 8850 91 16400
17 650 42 4350 67 9075 92 16800
18 700 43 4525 68 9300 93 17200
19 750 44 4700 69 9525 94 17600
20 800 45 4875 70 9750 95 18000
21 960 46 5050 71 9975 96 18400
22 1120 47 5225 72 10200 97 18800
23 1280 48 5400 73 10425 98 19200
24 1440 49 5575 74 10650 99 19600
25 1600 50 5750 75 10875 100 20000

1 March, 2009
REWARD EARNED IN RUPEES = 0.5 X REWARD POINTS
REWARD POINTS FOR INTANGIBLE SUGGESTIONS
ESCORTS
INTANGIBLE SUGGESTION "SCORE VS POINTS"
SCORE
REWARD POINTS REWARD IN RUPEES
(FOR SUGGESTION)
1 TO 10 0 0
11 76 38
12 80 40
13 86 43
14 96 48
15 100 50
16 120 60
17 140 70
18 160 80
19 180 90
20 200 100
21 220 110
22 240 120
23 260 130
24 280 140
25 300 150
26 320 160
27 340 170
28 360 180
29 380 190
30 400 200
31 420 210
32 440 220
33 460 230
34 480 240
35 500 250
36 520 260
37 540 270
38 560 280
39 580 290
40 600 300
1 March, 2009
50 1000 500