Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Overview
Laboratory for Underwater Systems and Technologies Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Computing UNIVERSITY OF ZAGREB
Outline
1. Introduction
System description
2. Mission
Scenario Execution
3. Results
Simulation Field test
4. Conclusion
IPSIT2012 27. 03. 2012. Zagreb, Croatia
1. Introduction
State of the Art
Execution of preplanned missions Selection of contact to be investigated, reacquired, and neutralized is done by an operator through a post-mission analysis
Assumption
a survey has been done by an AUV equipped with SAS sensor and the target has been identified
Motivation
Use collaborative autonomous vehicles in MCM scenarios autonomous mine neutralization and disposal.
Objective
Guide a simple unmanned underwater vehicle (UUV) from a more capable, sonar equipped, platform, preferably an autonomous underwater or surface vessel (AxV)
3
1. Introduction
Possible solutions
Using LBL/USBL for navigation of UUV PROS: more precise guidance CONS: expensive Using a forward looking multibeam sonar for UUV guidance PROS: cheap, UUV is dispensible CONS: less accurate, UUV has to be in sonars field of view
2. Mission - Scenario
2. Mission - Scenario
10
2. Mission - Scenario
11
2. Mission - Scenario
12
2. Mission - Scenario
13
2. Mission - Scenario
14
2. Mission - Scenario
15
3. Mission - Execution
16
3. Mission - Execution
Tethered link or Acoustic link transport delay!! limited bandwith cca 40bit/sec frequent dropouts
17
2. Mission - Execution
18
2. Mission
Advantages of the proposed system One way communication between the UUV and the AxV KF enables UUV navigation when measurements are not available Only UUV has to be in the field of view (not the target) If the AxV drifts due to currents, the UUV will not drift with it but it will stay and the line which has
19
4. Results - Simulation
Coupled model of the UUV Sonar measurement update every 1 s. control is performed at 10 Hz. ASV forward speed u = 0.1m/s ASV lateral speed due to currents v = 0.015m/s. The simulation results show that the vehicle is behaving as expected even when the multibeam sonar carrier (the reference point) is mobile, as long as the UUV is in the field of view.
IPSIT2012 27. 03. 2012. Zagreb, Croatia 23
acoustic communication September 2010 @NURC and guidance implemented Sea tests Tests in field conditions
IPSIT2012 27. 03. 2012. Zagreb, Croatia 24
25
4. Results
26
4. Results
movie
27
4. Results
movie2
28
5. Conclusion
Simulation results show that the vehicle is behaving as expected even when the multibeam sonar carrier (the reference point) is mobile, as long as the UUV is in the field of view. Field experiments have shown that lower resolution (and lower cost) sonar feedback can be used for guiding a simplified mine neutralization UUV to the moored or bottom mine
Future plans:
Cooperative MCM scenario using two UUVs
IPSIT2012 27. 03. 2012. Zagreb, Croatia 29
30